hsr2001

111
HID STATISTICS REPORT HSR 2001 002 Date of Issue: January 2002 Health & Safety Executive OFFSHORE HYDROCARBON RELEASES STATISTICS, 2001

Upload: marino-valisi

Post on 24-Oct-2014

36 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HSR2001

HID STATISTICS REPORT

HSR 2001 002

Date of Issue: January 2002 Health & Safety Executive

OFFSHORE HYDROCARBON RELEASES STATISTICS, 2001

Page 2: HSR2001

2

Preface This is the sixth report on statistics obtained from the HCR database, and is the fourth since the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995 (RIDDOR 95) came into force offshore on 1st April 1996. The report presents data on hydrocarbon releases that have been reported for the period 1st October 1992 to 31st March 2001 inclusive. It should also be noted that the report is now part of a new (HID Statistics Report – HSR) series to replace the OTO series, which is to be discontinued. Copies of this report can be obtained free of charge from:

Health and Safety Executive Hazardous Installations Directorate

Central Division CD4C Data Management Room 201b Merton House

Stanley Road Bootle

Merseyside L20 3DL

Tel: 0151 951 3099 Fax: 0151 951 4980

e-mail : [email protected] Copies of this report can also be downloaded free of charge from HSE’s website at http://www.hse.gov.uk/hid/osd/hsr2001/contents.htm

Page 3: HSR2001

3

OFFSHORE HYDROCARBON RELEASES

STATISTICS, 2001 (FOR THE PERIOD 1-10-92 TO 31-3-01 INCLUSIVE)

CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 2.0 DATA CATEGORIES 9 3.0 STATISTICS 10 3.1 Hydrocarbon type 10 3.2 Reporting frequency 11 3.3 Severity analysis 11 3.4 Systems 13 3.5 Equipment 15 3.6 Drilling/Well Operations 16 3.7 Installation type and location 16 3.8 Ignitions 18 3.9 Means of Detection 19 3.10 Emergency actions 20 3.11 Causation & Operating Mode 21 4.0 TABLES (See separate section index) 23 5.0 FIGURES (See separate section index) 95 Appendix 1 - ‘OSD PROCESS INTEGRITY INITIATIVE’ 105 Appendix 2 - ‘SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION’ 107 FEEDBACK QUESTIONNAIRE 111

Page 4: HSR2001

4

Page 5: HSR2001

5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

An agreed target under the Government’s “Revitalising Health and Safety” initiative

is to reduce the number of major and significant releases by 50% over the next three

years to March 2004, with 1999/2000 figures as baseline data. The total number of

major releases in 2000/2001 shows a substantial decrease, down from 12 to 8 (33%)

on last year’s figure, and the total number of significant releases has also decreased

from 126 to 117 (7%) over the same period. The combined total for major and

significant releases has therefore shown a reduction of 10% on the baseline target.

During the past year OSD undertook to investigate all hydrocarbon releases reported

to OSD as part of a three-part Process Integrity initiative (see Appendix 1). This

project was commissioned in the context of the sustained plateau in the number of

hydrocarbon releases evidenced in the data up to 1999/2000, with a view to

achieving a significant decrease. The results of these investigations are presented

in OTO 2001 0551, including an assessment of immediate and underlying causation

factors, which supplements the information given in this statistics report.

Reported minor releases have increased by 50% over the past year, from 96 to 145,

but there is good evidence that this increase is as a result of publicity related to the

Process Integrity Initiative, and does not represent an increase in the number of

minor releases occurring.

There were 13 reported ignitions in 2000/2001 none of which were major releases.

Although there have been no ignited major releases since the launch of the HCR

database, of the total 131 reported ignitions over the period 1 October 1992 to 31

March 2001, 40 of these (30.5%) have been significant releases (16 gas and 24

liquids).

Failure rates for individual systems and for individual items of equipment are

published in alternate years, and the failure rate data in this report updates that

provided in the 1999 Hydrocarbon Statistics Report, OTO 1999 079.

1 Offshore Technology Report OTO 2001 055, OSD Hydrocarbon Release Reduction Campaign – Report on the hydrocarbon release incident investigation project 1/4/2000 to 31/3/2001.

Page 6: HSR2001

6

Page 7: HSR2001

7

1. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this report is to provide the offshore industry with data from the

Hydrocarbon Releases (HCR) Database for their use in connection with the

preparation and revision of offshore safety cases, particularly in quantified risk

assessment (QRA), as recommended by Lord Cullen in his report on the Piper Alpha

disaster (Cullen Recommendation 39).

The HCR Database contains data on offshore hydrocarbon release incidents,

supplementary details of which are reported voluntarily to the Health and Safety

Executive, Hazardous Industries Directorate, Offshore Division (OSD) on form

OIR/12. These data have been technically checked against the “parent” RIDDOR

(OIR/9B) details, and then entered into the database by OSD since database start-

up on 1 October 1992.

This report, HSR 2001 002, covers the period 1 October 1992 to 31 March 2001. It is

the sixth report on statistics obtained from the HCR Database, and is the fourth since

the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995

(RIDDOR 95) came into force offshore on 1 April 1996.

Criteria for severity classification (i.e. major, significant, minor), first introduced in

1997, were refined in 1999 to include release rates (see Appendix 2). The limited

accuracy of the systems and equipment population data estimates, and the voluntary

nature of the information supplied on form OIR/12, should all be taken into

consideration when drawing conclusions from the statistics contained in this report.

The main thrust of this report is to advise industry of the bare statistics.

Nevertheless, some discussion has been added where appropriate. This report also

contains statistics on detection modes, emergency actions, and causation, but offers

no root cause analysis at this stage. However, in view of the reporting plateau

evidenced in data up to 1999/2000, and the absence of any downward trend to that

time, OSD began a 3-part Process Integrity initiative (see Appendix 1) aimed at

raising industry awareness to the problem and identifying their root causes, with a

view to achieving a significant break through in the existing plateau.

Page 8: HSR2001

8

An agreed target under the Government’s “Revitalising Health and Safety” initiative

is to reduce the number of major and significant releases by 50% by March 2004.

Detailed failure rate tables are published in alternate years, and the latest versions of

(a) System Failure Rates & Severity / Hole Size Distribution; and (b) Equipment

Failure Rates & Severity / Hole Size Distribution are included in this report.

The failure rate data in this report therefore updates that provided in the 1999

Hydrocarbon Statistics Report, OTO 1999 079.

Feedback on the contents of this statistics report for 2001 would be appreciated.

This can be provided by completing the single page questionnaire form at the back

of the report and returning it to HSE Hazardous Installations Directorate, at the

address indicated on the form.

Page 9: HSR2001

9

2. DATA CATEGORIES This section describes the categories of data available from the HCR Database,

statistics from which are contained in section 3.0.

Section 4.0 contains the data tables referred to in the report, all of which are listed in

a separate section 4.0 index.

Section 5.0 contains the figures referred to in the report, all of which are listed in a

separate section 5.0 index.

The statistics, tables, and figures show the breakdown of data using the following

sort categories:

v Type of hydrocarbon, viz. liquids (oil/condensate/non-process2), gas, or 2-phase

v Severity of release, i.e. major, significant, or minor (Appendix 2)

v Type of installation, viz. fixed (including Floating Production Systems [FPS]),

mobile or subsea

v Location of installation on the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) viz. Northern (above

590 Latitude), Central (560 to 590 Latitude) or Southern area (below 560 Latitude,

including Irish Sea and English Channel)

v Year of occurrence (12 month periods from 1 April to 31 March unless noted

otherwise)

Each release has a single system type allocated to it and an individual equipment

type within that system (well type and/or well operation for drilling activities). Most

tables show the number of releases occurring, sorted by one or more of the above

categories.

Statistics for other reported features such as ignitions, mode of detection, emergency

actions taken, causation factors etc., are also given in Section 3.0.

2Non-process hydrocarbon liquids include diesel, helifuel, lubricants, methanol, etc.

Page 10: HSR2001

10

3. STATISTICS

A total of 2071 hydrocarbon release incident reports have been received, checked

and input during the 8½ year period since the start-up of the Hydrocarbon Releases

(HCR) Database on 1 October 1992, up to 31 March 2001 inclusive.

The following subsections comprise detailed discussion of the statistics shown in the

tables and figures in sections 4.0 and 5.0 respectively.

Caution should be exercised when interpreting these statistics, in view of the limited

accuracy of population data, the voluntary nature of the information supplied on form

OIR/12, and the small number of releases involved in some cases.

3.1 Hydrocarbon type

Figure 1, in section 5.0, shows the breakdown of reported releases by hydrocarbon

type. It can be seen from this pie-chart that gas releases constituted, by far, the

largest proportion of releases reported, i.e. 1150 out of 2071 (55.5%). The other

types, ranked in decreasing order, were oil 347 (16.8%), non-process 239 (11.5%),

2-phase 184 (8.9%) and condensate 151 (7.3%).

The higher proportion of gas releases may have arisen from the fact that almost all

offshore installations handle gas, but only 37% of installations handle hydrocarbon

production liquids (see also section 3.7 - “Installations”). Other contributing factors to

the higher incidence of gas releases could be that gas is usually subjected to higher

pressures and temperatures than other forms of hydrocarbon, hence there are

greater challenges associated with gas containment.

Page 11: HSR2001

11

3.2 Reporting frequency

Figure 2, in section 5.0, shows the monthly reporting frequencies since October 1992

up to the end of March 2001. Major milestones which occurred during the reporting

period are also listed.

Reporting reached a peak of 325 in 1994/1995, probably attributable to more

detailed reporting following the issue of the OIR/12 form in August, 1992, and to

comprehensive guidance3 in August, 1993. There then fo llowed a substantial drop

down to 212 in 1995/96, ostensibly due to the safety case regime and improved

safety management systems taking effect. Thereafter, the number of incidents

seemed to have reached a plateau with the annual totals for the following years

being 226 (1996/1997), 218 (1997/1998), 234 (1998/1999) and 234 (1999/2000),

and the monthly reporting rate fluctuated between 18 to 20 in the same period.

Although the number of major and significant releases has decreased to 125 (from

138 in 1999/2000) the total number of reported releases has increased to 270 for

2000/2001, reflecting a marked increase in the number of minor releases, with the

monthly average increasing to 22.5. The increase in the number of minor releases

reported has been attributed to the effects of raised awareness during the

investigation phase of the Process Integrity initiative, which was carried out during

2000/2001.

3.3 Severity analysis

3.3.1 All releases

All releases have been classified according to agreed severity criteria.

(See Appendix 2). Table 4 in Section 4.0 shows that, of the 2071 reported releases

to 31 March 2001, 143 were classified major (6.9% of all leaks), 1173 were

significant releases (56.6%) and the remaining 755 were minor (36.5%).

3Revised in Nov 96 to encompass RIDDOR 95 “Revised Guidance on Reporting Offshore

Hydrocarbon Releases” OTO 96 956, is available free on request from HSE on tel :0151-951-3099 or

fax: 0151-951-3098 or e-mail: [email protected] or downloaded free from the HSE web-

site: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/frameset/oto/1996/index.htm

Page 12: HSR2001

12

Figure 3 in section 5.0 shows the reporting patterns by year for major, significant and

minor releases in both tabular and line graph form. The overall number of major

releases in 2000/2001 decreased from last year’s figures (down from 12 to 8), and

the number of significant releases also decreased (from 126 to 117) over the same

period. In contrast, the overall number of minor4 releases reported in 2000/2001

increased in comparison with last year's figure (up from 96 to 145).

3.3.2 Gas releases

Figure 4 in section 5.0 shows the reporting patterns by year for major, significant and

minor gas releases in both tabular and line graph form. The upward trend in the

annual number of reported gas releases continued in 2000/2001, with a further

increase of 3.6% over the previous year (up from 136 to 141). However, the number

of major gas releases went down for the first time since the low of 6 in 1997/98

having decreased to 7 in 2000/2001 from 11 in 1999/2000. Similarly, significant gas

releases also dropped from 79 to 74 in the same period. The combined number of

major and significant gas releases has decreased from 90 in 1999/2000 to 81 in

2000/2001. This is the lowest full-year figure for combined major and significant

releases since the start-up of the HCR database. However, the number of minor gas

releases has shown a year in year increase since 1995/1996, again going up from

46 to 60 in the past year.

3.3.3 Liquid releases

Figure 5 in section 5.0 shows the reporting patterns by year for major, significant and minor liquid releases in both tabular and line graph form. It can be seen from these that the annual numbers of reported liquid releases (i.e. oil, condensate and non-process combined) have fluctuated over the years since database start-up, with no discernible trend. The number of minor releases has however increased from 47 in 1999/2000 to 79 in 2000/2001, reflecting the overall increase in minor releases over this period. 4It is important to note that reports of minor releases only cover those reportable under RIDDOR

definitions which are based on the potential for fire/explosion. It should also be noted that all ignitions

offshore are reportable, however minor.

Page 13: HSR2001

13

3.3.4 2-phase releases

Figure 6 in section 5.0 shows the reporting patterns by year for major, significant and

minor 2-phase releases in both tabular and line graph form. From these, it can be

seen that the numbers of reported 2-phase releases have also fluctuated over the

years since database start-up. As with liquid releases, there is no discernible trend.

3.4 Systems

3.4.1 Failure rates and severity / hole size distribution

Table 1 in section 4.0 gives details of failure rates and severity / hole size

distributions for all system types (in alphabetical order) contained in the database,

whether any releases were reported for the system type or not. It should also be

noted that “Drilling” in this case only involves those releases from permanent drilling

equipment, and does not include those releases related to drilling activities and well

operations such as workover. Information on severity and hole size distribution for

drilling and well operations is given in section 3.6 of this report, and in Table 3 below.

(a) Failure Rates:

The population in system years is given in the table (SYSYEARS=summation of the

total years of that type of system that has been on each installation), together with

the number of releases reported against that system type (LEAK) for each year since

the start-up of the database in October 1992. The failure rate for any system is

given by the total leaks divided by the total system years, and is expressed as a rate

per system year. If no releases were reported, then a rate has not been calculated

(see notes on table). It is recognized that there are methods of estimating failure

rates, even given a zero occurrence, but it is left to the practitioner to select the

method appropriate to the scenario under analysis.

(b) Severity Distribution:

The total number of releases for each system has been broken down into the three

classes of severity i.e. major, significant or minor (see Appendix 2 for details), and a

fractional distribution has been calculated for each.

Page 14: HSR2001

14

(c) Hole Size Distribution

The total number of leaks for each system has been broken down into seven hole

size categories, together with the fractional distribution for each band or range of

hole size. It should be noted that hole size is not considered applicable to some

scenarios involving open topped vessels (e.g. shale shakers, wemco units, tilted

plate separators, etc.), and certain other scenarios involving liquid carry-over, so

these have been assigned to a separate category (N/A), in addition to the six ranges

shown.

IMPORTANT: The severity distribution may be used to find the proportion of major,

significant or minor releases within any system failure rate. Similarly, the hole size

distribution may be used to determine the proportion of releases within each hole

size band. It is very important to note, however, that only one of these

distributions should be used at any one time, and that it is incorrect to apply

both distributions together on failure rates. For example, the proportion of hole

size <10mm for major releases can NOT be found by multiplying the two relevant

factors together.

3.4.2 Systems : highest 15 failure rates

The barchart in figure 7, section 5.0, shows the failure rates in leaks per system year

for the highest ranked 15 release rates out of a total of 52 system types.

The system with the highest failure rate is gas compression with a failure rate of

3.00 x 10-1 leaks per system year. High operating temperatures and pressures,

vibration, and the consequent effects of these on vulnerable equipment items such

as seals, instruments, and small bore pipework items etc. are considered to be major

contributors to the frequency of hydrocarbon releases from this system type, and

these factors have been taken into account in the current Process Integrity initiative

(Appendix 1).

The next highest system failure rate was for subsea gas injection wells (1.67 x 10-1

leaks per system year). Caution should however be exercised when interpreting this

rate, as the calculation is based on a very small equipment population.

Page 15: HSR2001

15

The next highest ranking systems were oil export (1.44 x 10-1 leaks per system

year), and fuel gas (1.39 x 10-1 leaks per system year).

3.5 Equipment

3.5.1 Failure rates and severity / hole size distribution

Table 2 in section 4.0 portrays equipment failure rates, severity and hole size

distributions in similar fashion to those described for systems, and so it is important

to read sections 3.4.1 (a), (b), (c) above in relation to equipment items also.

Again, it is very important to note that only one of the distributions should be

used at any one time, and that it is incorrect to apply both distributions

together on any failure rates.

The relationship between systems and individual items of equipment in them has

been omitted due to the relatively small number of releases reported compared to

the large number of system / equipment type combinations involved.

3.5.2 Equipment : highest 15 failure rates

The barchart in figure 8, section 5.0, shows the failure rates in leaks per equipment

year for the highest ranked 15 release rates out of a total of 119 equipment types.

The major equipment items with the highest failure rates are dual fuel turbines at

7.24 x 10-2 leaks per equipment year, and reciprocating compressors at 6.50 x 10-2

leaks per equipment year. These indicate strong links with the high gas

compression system leak rates shown above.

It should be noted that the equipment items having the highest numbers of reported

leaks were instruments (316 total), and pipework items such as valves, flanges and

piping. Their respective population numbers are also very large and thus their

respective failure rates in the rankings are reduced. However, the problems (with

Page 16: HSR2001

16

small bore tubing in particular) have been recognised and guidelines5 have been

produced for addressing loss of containment, etc.

3.6 Drilling/Well Operations activities versus release type and severity

3.6.1 Severity / hole size distribution

Table 3 in section 4.0 portrays Drilling and Well Operations activities due to the

different population data requirements i.e. per activity per rig year, rather than per

system year or equipment year. Drilling activities are sorted by well type i.e.

exploration, appraisal, development, completion, etc. Well operations are sorted by

operation type i.e. wireline, coiled tubing, etc. as shown. It should be noted that, due

to the lack of suitable population data, failure rates cannot be provided for drilling /

well operations activities. Therefore, only severity and hole size distributions are

shown in the table. Again, it is very important to note that only one of the

distributions should be used at anyone time, and that it is incorrect to apply

both distributions together.

3.7 Installation type/location versus release type and severity

Table 5 in section 4.0 summarises the breakdown of all reported releases by

hydrocarbon type versus installation type, i.e. fixed which includes floating

production systems (FPS), mobile including both drilling and accommodation units,

and subsea.

Each installation also has an associated location in either the Northern (above 590

Latitude North), Central (560 to 590 Latitude North), or Southern (below 560 Latitude

North, including Irish Sea and English Channel) areas of UKCS. The total current

population and the estimated number of installation years (as at 31 March 2001) is

also given for each installation type on the UKCS by area.

5Guidelines for the Management, Design, Installation and Maintenance of Small Bore Tubing Systems. ISBN 0 85293 275 8. Published in 2000 by the Institute of Petroleum.

Page 17: HSR2001

17

3.7.1 Installation type

The breakdown by installation type showed that fixed installations were responsible

for 1994 (96.3%) of releases reported. In contrast, only 77 releases (3.7%) were

reported by mobile drilling and accommodation installations. These proportions are

not considered unusual, because there is constant exposure to hydrocarbons on

fixed installations whereas the exposure on mobile installations is intermittent.

3.7.2 Fixed installation failure rates

Failure rates have been calculated in terms of leaks per installation year, for each

type of installation, by dividing the total number of leaks for that type by the total

number of installation years.

Floating Production Systems (including FPSO and FSU) had the highest overall leak

rate of 2.8 leaks per installation year, with 5.9% major releases. Fixed attended

installations in the Northern North Sea had the next highest leak rate of 2.5 leaks per

installation year, with 5.2% of these being major releases. Central fixed attended

installations were next, with 2.3 leaks per installation year, with 5.2% major releases.

Southern fixed attended insta llations had a leak rate of 0.4 leaks per installation

year, with 8.7% major, and Southern normally unattended installations (NUI) leak

rate was 0.2 leaks per installation year, with 20.5% major releases.

The production equipment on the larger attended oil production platforms in the

Northern and Central areas is more complex and subject to much greater fluctuation

of operating parameters than on the simpler and smaller gas production platforms in

the Southern area. It is reasonably foreseeable, therefore, that there may be a

greater propensity for hydrocarbon releases of all types on the larger installations.

In view of the smaller numbers of the larger installations, it is also expected that

failure rates would be much greater than those in the Southern Sector.

3.7.3 Mobile installation failure rates

Using the population data held in the HCR database, leak rates have been

calculated in terms of leaks per installation year, for each type of mobile installation.

However, in the absence of accurate rig years data, it was necessary to assume that

each unit was present on the UKCS for the entire period since their arrival, and so

Page 18: HSR2001

18

these leak rates must be considered very approximate (and tending toward best

case) as a result.

Combining Southern and Central release figures gave an overall leak rate for jack-up

mobile drilling and accommodation units of 0.4 leaks per installation year, with 7.3%

major releases. Northern and Central release figures combined gave an overall leak

rate for semi-submersible mobile drilling and accommodation units of 0.3 leaks per

installation year, with 19.4% major releases.

3.8 Ignitions

3.8.1 Ignition summary

Table 6, section 4.0, summarises the numbers of ignitions for each year versus the

number of releases for each type of hydrocarbon. It is important to note that the

percentages shown are ignition rates (i.e. percentage of releases ignited) and NOT

ignition probabilities (i.e. the likelihood of a particular release igniting).

There was a grand total of 131 reported ignitions (i.e. 6.3% of all releases) over the

8½ year period, none of which were major.

There were 40 gas ignitions (30.5% of all ignitions), of which 16 were classed as

significant releases (ignition rate 2.2%), and 24 as minor (ignition rate 7.7%). There

were no major ignited gas releases.

There were 91 liquid ignitions (69.5% of all ignitions) of which 24 were classed as

significant releases (ignition rate 8.0%), and 67 as minor (ignition rate 15.9%). There

were no major ignited liquids releases.

There have been no reported 2-phase ignitions to date.

The higher ignition rates in the case of minor releases, and liquids releases in

particular, is considered to be due to the fact that reports of unignited minor releases

cover only those reportable under RIDDOR definitions based on the potential for

fire/explosion, but that ALL ignitions are reportable no matter how minor.

Page 19: HSR2001

19

3.8.2 Ignition details

Table 7, section 4.0, comprises three parts, which contain full details of every ignition

reported in the 8½ years to 31 March 2001.

The three parts cover the following details :

(a) Release parameters

(b) Mode of operation/ignition sources/ignition sequences, and

(c) Detection mode/emergency actions taken.

Each individual record has a unique number and so it is possible to read all three

parts for one ignition incident to obtain the full picture. The purpose of this report is to

provide statistics only, so any analysis of ignitions has been excluded here.

3.9 Means of detection

3.9.1 Summary

Table 8 in section 4.0, summarises the modes of detection employed during an

incident versus the type of hydrocarbon and severity of release. The modes

comprise heat, smoke, flame, gas and ‘other’. It should be noted that more than one

means of detection may be reported for any one release, and so the totals for each

column may be more than the total number of releases reported.

There were 2212 detection modes connected with the total 2071 reported releases,

more than one mode being effective on some releases. Gas detectors detected

41.8% of all releases (58.7% of gas releases), and the remaining releases were

mainly detected by means other than equipment designed for the purpose (see 3.9.2

below).

3.9.2 Other detection modes

A breakdown of the ‘other’ category which includes detection by visual means, by

sound, by smell etc., is shown in table 9, section 4.0. It is considered important to

have a separate table for these, since they have made a substantial contribution to

the overall detection of offshore releases.

Page 20: HSR2001

20

Of the total 2212 modes, 1267 (57.3% of modes) involved means of detection other

than by dedicated detection systems. Of these 1267 ‘other’ means of detection 975

(77%) were visually detected, of which 49 (5% of visual detection) involved major

releases, 521 (53% of visual detection) involved significant releases, and 405 (42%)

minor releases.

Specific detection details for all reported ignitions are included in table 7 (c).

3.10 Emergency actions versus release type & severity

Table 10, section 4.0, shows a breakdown of the various types of emergency actions

taken against the types and severity of releases involved. These actions include

either automatic or manual initiation of shutdown, blowdown, deluge, and/or

CO2/Halon systems, plus whether any musters and/or any other emergency actions

were carried out.

Nearly two-thirds of releases (1355) required shutdown action (404 automatic, 951

manual), of which 103 (7.6% of shutdowns) were for major releases. Blowdown

operated on 629 (255 auto, 374 manual = 30.4% of all releases) of which 64 (10.2%

of blowdowns) were for major releases.

There were 560 musters (520 at stations, 40 at lifeboats = 27.0% of all releases), 58

of which (10.4% of musters) were for major releases.

In contrast, deluge only operated on 41 releases (2.0% of all releases), of which 11

(26.8% of deluge) were for major releases, and only 52 (2.5% of all releases)

involved the use of CO2/Halon systems, of which only 1 was for a major release.

There were a total of 62 releases (5 major, 35 significant, 22 minor) where no

reported emergency actions were taken. This represents 3.0% of all major releases,

3.0% of significant releases, and 2.9% of minor releases. This indicates that,

regardless of severity, 97.0% of all reported releases involved some sort of

Page 21: HSR2001

21

emergency action. Specific emergency actions taken for all ignitions reported to 31

March 2001 are included in table 7(c).

3.11 Causation & operating mode versus release type & severity

Table 11, section 4.0, summarises the breakdown of all types of release into the four

main causation categories (i.e. design, equipment, operational and/or procedural

faults) plus details of the mode of operation in the area at the time of the incident. It

should be noted that more than one category may be involved in any one incident,

and so caution should be exercised when interpreting the figures shown.

The most frequently reported factor was equipment fault at 1362 (65.8% of

incidents). Operational faults were next with 1116 (53.9% of incidents), procedural

faults 588 (28.4% of incidents), and design faults 321 (15.5% of incidents).

The proportion of releases occurring during normal production was 48.8% compared

to that during intervention type activities such as start-up / reinstatement (18.1%),

drilling / workover (9.5%), and maintenance / construction (9.7%). These proportions

have generally been maintained throughout each year since database start-up in

October 1992.

The causation factor involved in most incidents was ‘mechanical failure’ which

occurred on 920 occasions (44.4% of all incidents), followed by ‘improper operation’

that occurred on 495 occasions (23.9% of all incidents).

A detailed analysis of the causation factors involved in the investigation phase of the

Process integrity Initiative (see Appendix 1) is contained in OTO 2001 055.

Page 22: HSR2001

22

Page 23: HSR2001

23

4.0 TABLES

CONTENTS (All single page tables unless noted otherwise)

Table 1. System failure rates and severity / hole size distribution (9 pages)

2. Equipment failure rates and severity / hole size distribution

(24 pages)

3. Drilling and Well operations, severity / hole size distribution

(7 Pages)

4. Severity analysis

5. Installation type/location versus release type & severity (2 pages incl. notes)

6. Ignitions : summary

7. Ignitions : details (3 tables of 5, 6 and 5 pages, plus 1 page of notes)

8. Means of detection : summary

9. Means of detection : other

10. Emergency actions versus release type & severity

11. Causation & operating mode versus release type & severity

Page 24: HSR2001

24

Page 25: HSR2001

25

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 1137 0 6 0 6 3 1 0 1 0 1 0

1999/00 193 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 196 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1526 1 7 0 8 5.24E-03 4 2 0 1 0 1 0

BLOWDOWN

0.13 0.88 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.25 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00

Previous 1317 2 20 5 27 8 3 3 1 0 8 4

1999/00 222 0 2 4 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 1

2000/01 225 0 3 5 8 7 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1764 2 25 14 41 2.32E-02 19 5 3 1 0 8 5

DRAINS, CLOSED,

0.05 0.61 0.34 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.46 0.12 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.20 0.12

Previous 1436 0 21 15 36 19 7 3 3 1 3 0

1999/00 248 0 3 4 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0

2000/01 252 0 5 8 13 7 4 1 0 0 1 0

Total: 1936 0 29 27 56 2.89E-02 31 12 5 3 1 4 0

DRAINS, OPEN,

0.00 0.52 0.48 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.55 0.21 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.07 0.00

Previous 863 1 9 2 12 0 0 3 5 0 2 2

1999/00 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1139 1 9 2 12 1.05E-02 0 0 3 5 0 2 2

DRILLING

0.08 0.75 0.17 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.42 0.00 0.17 0.17

Previous 113 0 6 4 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 17 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 18 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 148 0 7 7 14 9.46E-02 12 2 0 0 0 0 0

EXPORT, CONDENSATE,

0.00 0.50 0.50 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.86 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1225 7 26 10 43 31 7 1 2 1 1 0

1999/00 203 0 3 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 206 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1634 7 33 11 51 3.12E-02 39 7 1 2 1 1 0

EXPORT, GAS,

0.14 0.65 0.22 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.76 0.14 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.00

Page 26: HSR2001

26

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 687 4 47 52 103 74 14 3 0 2 7 3

1999/00 119 0 4 5 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 119 0 6 15 21 18 2 0 0 0 0 1

Total: 925 4 57 72 133 1.44E-01 100 17 3 0 2 7 4

EXPORT, OIL,

0.03 0.43 0.54 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.75 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.03

Previous 676 2 11 10 23 9 2 4 1 1 1 5

1999/00 120 1 2 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 0

2000/01 121 0 4 2 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 917 3 17 12 32 3.49E-02 15 4 4 1 2 1 5

FLARE, HP,

0.09 0.53 0.38 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.47 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.16

Previous 753 2 7 2 11 2 0 2 2 0 2 3

1999/00 135 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 2

2000/01 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1025 3 11 2 16 1.56E-02 2 0 2 4 0 3 5

FLARE, LP,

0.19 0.69 0.13 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.25 0.00 0.19 0.31

Previous 6011 14 43 6 63 54 6 2 0 0 1 0

1999/00 979 4 8 2 14 10 4 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 989 0 5 2 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 7979 18 56 10 84 1.05E-02 69 12 2 0 0 1 0

FLOWLINES, GAS

0.21 0.67 0.12 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.82 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00

Previous 5643 6 38 25 69 63 0 2 0 0 4 0

1999/00 992 1 3 5 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 992 1 8 7 16 15 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 7627 8 49 37 94 1.23E-02 86 2 2 0 0 4 0

FLOWLINES, OIL

0.09 0.52 0.39 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.91 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00

Previous 4885 1 1 1 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0

1999/00 763 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 763 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 6411 1 1 1 3 4.68E-04 2 0 0 1 0 0 0

FLOWLINES, OTHER, (CONDENSATE, METHANOL ETC)

0.33 0.33 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 27: HSR2001

27

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 835 16 172 51 239 181 36 9 0 3 5 5

1999/00 141 2 37 10 49 44 4 1 0 0 0 0

2000/01 145 1 26 21 48 44 2 1 1 0 0 0

Total: 1121 19 235 82 336 3.00E-01 269 42 11 1 3 5 5

GAS COMPRESSION.

0.06 0.70 0.24 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.80 0.13 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01

Previous 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 78 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

IMPORT, CONDENSATE

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 1231 2 12 4 18 14 2 1 0 0 1 0

1999/00 185 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 188 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1604 2 13 7 22 1.37E-02 18 2 1 0 0 1 0

IMPORT, GAS,

0.09 0.59 0.32 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.82 0.09 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00

Previous 802 1 13 8 22 16 1 2 0 0 2 1

1999/00 139 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 139 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1080 1 15 9 25 2.31E-02 19 1 2 0 0 2 1

IMPORT, OIL,

0.04 0.60 0.36 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.76 0.04 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.04

Previous 1728 3 13 2 18 16 2 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 281 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 283 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2292 5 14 3 22 9.60E-03 19 3 0 0 0 0 0

MANIFOLD, GAS

0.23 0.64 0.14 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.86 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1417 3 17 3 23 17 2 2 0 0 2 0

1999/00 253 0 5 4 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 253 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1923 3 23 9 35 1.82E-02 28 3 2 0 0 2 0

MANIFOLD, OIL

0.09 0.66 0.26 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.80 0.09 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00

Page 28: HSR2001

28

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 1781 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

1999/00 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 281 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2343 0 2 0 2 8.54E-04 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

MANIFOLD, OTHER, (CONDENSATE, METHANOL ETC)

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 309 0 5 8 13 11 2 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 50 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 52 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 411 0 6 10 16 3.89E-02 14 2 0 0 0 0 0

METERING, CONDENSATE,

0.00 0.38 0.63 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.88 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1087 1 20 8 29 23 5 0 0 0 0 1

1999/00 186 0 5 2 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 188 0 5 2 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1461 1 30 12 43 2.94E-02 36 6 0 0 0 0 1

METERING, GAS,

0.02 0.70 0.28 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.84 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02

Previous 640 2 10 11 23 15 5 0 1 1 1 0

1999/00 117 0 4 2 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000 117 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 874 2 14 15 31 3.55E-02 22 6 0 1 1 1 0

METERING, OIL,

0.06 0.45 0.48 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.71 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00

Previous 707 0 1 3 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 958 0 1 3 4 4.18E-03 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

PROCESSING, GAS, CHEMICAL INJECTION

0.00 0.25 0.75 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 571 2 29 15 46 33 4 3 3 1 0 2

1999/00 98 1 3 5 9 6 2 1 0 0 0 0

2000/01 99 0 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 768 3 34 22 59 7.68E-02 43 6 4 3 1 0 2

PROCESSING, GAS, DEHYDRATION

0.05 0.58 0.37 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.73 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.03

Page 29: HSR2001

29

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 542 0 19 19 38 31 5 1 0 1 0 0

1999/00 90 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 92 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 724 0 20 23 43 5.94E-02 36 5 1 0 1 0 0

PROCESSING, GAS, LPG/ CONDENSATE

0.00 0.47 0.53 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.84 0.12 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00

Previous 739 0 5 5 10 8 1 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 132 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 134 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1005 0 6 9 15 1.49E-02 13 1 1 0 0 0 0

PROCESSING, GAS, METHANOL (INJECTION)

0.00 0.40 0.60 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.87 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 409 0 5 1 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 69 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 547 0 5 2 7 1.28E-02 6 1 0 0 0 0 0

PROCESSING, GAS, PROD. WATER TREATMENT.

0.00 0.71 0.29 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.86 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 59 0 2 2 4 2 0 1 0 0 1 0

1999/00 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 78 0 2 2 4 5.13E-02 2 0 1 0 0 1 0

PROCESSING, GAS, SOUR (H2S/CO2) TREATMENT.

0.00 0.50 0.50 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00

Previous 1123 0 2 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1506 0 2 1 3 1.99E-03 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

PROCESSING, OIL, CHEMICAL INJECTION

0.00 0.67 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.67 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 240 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 52 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 343 0 1 2 3 8.75E-03 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

PROCESSING, OIL, METHANOL (INJECTION)

0.00 0.33 0.67 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.67 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 30: HSR2001

30

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 250 1 16 9 26 21 3 0 1 0 1 0

1999/00 48 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 48 0 0 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

346 1 17 12 30 8.67E-02 24 4 0 1 0 1 0

PROCESSING, OIL, OIL TREATMENT,

0.03 0.57 0.40 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.80 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00

Previous 471 2 18 22 42 14 8 4 2 0 3 11

1999/00 84 0 1 5 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 2

2000/01 85 0 2 3 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 1

Total: 640 2 21 30 53 8.28E-02 21 9 4 2 0 3 14

PROCESSING, OIL, PROD. WATER TREATMENT,

0.04 0.40 0.57 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.40 0.17 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.06 0.26

Previous 865 5 8 6 19 15 2 1 0 1 0 0

1999/00 131 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 134 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 1

Total: 1130 6 11 7 24 2.12E-02 17 3 2 0 1 0 1

SEPARATION, GAS PRODUCTION

0.25 0.46 0.29 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.71 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04

Previous 425 2 2 3 7 6 0 0 1 0 0 0

1999/00 65 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 66 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 556 2 5 3 10 1.80E-02 9 0 0 1 0 0 0

SEPARATION, GAS TEST

0.20 0.50 0.30 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 662 3 38 20 61 46 6 2 0 0 3 4

1999/00 116 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 116 0 5 3 8 7 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 894 3 45 23 71 7.94E-02 53 9 2 0 0 3 4

SEPARATION, OIL PRODUCTION

0.04 0.63 0.32 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.75 0.13 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.06

Previous 435 5 16 7 28 19 4 2 0 1 0 2

1999/00 80 0 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 80 0 4 1 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 595 5 22 9 36 6.05E-02 26 5 2 0 1 0 2

SEPARATION, OIL TEST

0.14 0.61 0.25 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.72 0.14 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.06

Page 31: HSR2001

31

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 767 7 59 44 110 75 17 10 2 1 3 2

1999/00 127 1 5 4 10 6 1 0 1 0 0 2

2000/01 129 0 9 13 22 21 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1023 8 73 61 142 1.39E-01 102 19 10 3 1 3 4

UTILITIES, GAS, FUEL GAS,

0.06 0.51 0.43 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.72 0.13 0.07 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.03

Previous 1580 1 21 18 40 33 3 0 0 0 0 4

1999/00 269 0 2 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

2000/01 272 0 1 3 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2121 1 24 23 48 2.26E-02 37 4 0 0 0 1 6

UTILITIES, GAS, POWER GEN. TURBINES.

0.02 0.50 0.48 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.77 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.13

Previous 2287 1 27 36 64 44 9 4 3 0 3 1

1999/00 386 0 7 13 20 18 2 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 390 0 3 12 15 14 0 1 0 0 0 0

Total: 3063 1 37 61 99 3.23E-02 76 11 5 3 0 3 1

UTILITIES, OIL, DIESEL.

0.01 0.37 0.62 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.77 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.01

Previous 316 0 3 8 11 7 2 2 0 0 0 0

1999/00 63 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 64 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 443 0 4 9 13 2.93E-02 9 2 2 0 0 0 0

UTILITIES, OIL, HEAT TRANSFER OIL

0.00 0.31 0.69 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.69 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 996 0 2 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 164 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 165 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1325 0 2 4 6 4.53E-03 3 2 1 0 0 0 0

UTILITIES, OIL, HELI -FUEL / JET FUEL

0.00 0.33 0.67 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.33 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 3092 0 4 5 9 6 2 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 540 0 1 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1

2000/01 540 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

Total: 4172 1 5 8 14 3.36E-03 9 2 2 0 0 0 1

UTILITIES, OIL, POWER GEN. TURBINES.

0.07 0.36 0.57 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.64 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07

Page 32: HSR2001

32

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 1052 3 14 9 26 11 2 1 4 0 4 4

1999/00 177 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1408 3 14 9 26 1.85E-02 11 2 1 4 0 4 4

VENT, HP,

0.12 0.54 0.35 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.42 0.08 0.04 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.15

Previous 1441 2 4 5 11 3 2 2 1 1 1 1

1999/00 247 0 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

2000/01 249 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1937 2 4 10 16 8.26E-03 6 3 2 1 1 1 2

VENT, LP,

0.13 0.25 0.63 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.38 0.19 0.13 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.13

Previous 837 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1105 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL CONTROL

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 6 0 1 0 1 1.67E-01 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL, GAS INJECTION, SUBSEA

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 344 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 54 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 452 0 2 1 3 6.64E-03 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL, GAS INJECTION, SURFACE

0.00 0.67 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 190 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 252 1 1 0 2 7.94E-03 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

WELL, GAS PRODUCTION, SUBSEA

0.50 0.50 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00

Page 33: HSR2001

33

TABLE 1 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) SYSYEARS

(Note 1)

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2) Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total System Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER .

Previous 3940 2 19 3 24 19 5 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 648 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 658 0 2 2 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 5246 2 23 5 30 5.72E-03 24 6 0 0 0 0 0

WELL, GAS PRODUCTION, SURFACE

0.07 0.77 0.17 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.80 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1003 1 12 0 13 11 2 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 220 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 220 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1443 1 14 1 16 1.11E-02 14 2 0 0 0 0 0

WELL, OIL PRODUCTION, SUBSEA,

0.06 0.88 0.06 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.88 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 4724 5 24 5 34 26 5 1 1 0 1 0

1999/00 782 0 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 782 0 5 5 10 9 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 6288 5 31 12 48 7.63E-03 39 6 1 1 0 1 0

WELL, OIL PRODUCTION, SURFACE

0.10 0.65 0.25 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.81 0.13 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00

Previous 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 144 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL, OTHER, SUBSEA

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 1009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1319 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL, OTHER, SURFACE

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 34: HSR2001

34

Page 35: HSR2001

35

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 266 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 344 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BOP STACKS, SUBSEA

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 839 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1101 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BOP STACKS, SURFACE

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 1752 1 7 6 14 8 3 1 0 0 0 2

1999/00 318 0 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 325 0 2 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2395 1 11 10 22 9.19E-03 16 3 1 0 0 0 2

COMPRESSORS, CENTRIFUGAL

0.05 0.50 0.45 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.73 0.14 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09

Previous 235 0 11 5 16 13 3 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 45 0 5 0 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 323 0 16 5 21 6.50E-02 17 4 0 0 0 0 0

COMPRESSORS, RECIPROCATING

0.00 0.76 0.24 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.81 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 4739 0 8 5 13 6 0 3 2 0 1 1

1999/00 743 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 743 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 6225 0 10 6 16 2.57E-03 8 1 3 2 0 1 1

CRUDE OIL STORAGE TANKS

0.00 0.63 0.38 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.06 0.19 0.13 0.00 0.06 0.06

Page 36: HSR2001

36

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 1442 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1897 0 1 0 1 5.27E-04 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

DEGASSERS

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 866 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1134 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DIVERTERS

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 0 2 24 10 36 13 6 3 1 1 7 5

1999/00 0 0 1 4 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 2

2000/01 0 0 2 6 8 5 3 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 2 27 20 49 Note 2 21 9 3 1 1 7 7

DRAIN OPENING

0.04 0.55 0.41 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.43 0.18 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.14 0.14

Previous 0 0 2 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 0 2 2 4 Note 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0

DRAIN PLUG

0.00 0.50 0.50 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 70 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 94 0 1 1 2 2.13E-02 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

EXPANDERS

0.00 0.50 0.50 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 37: HSR2001

37

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 6953 0 15 10 25 19 2 1 1 1 0 1

1999/00 1191 0 2 3 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1206 0 3 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 9350 0 20 14 34 3.64E-03 27 3 1 1 1 0 1

FILTERS

0.00 0.59 0.41 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.79 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03

Previous 642 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 866 0 2 0 2 2.31E-03 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

FIN FAN COOLERS

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1293810 2 52 15 69 59 2 2 1 0 5 0

1999/00 234203 0 7 6 13 10 1 1 0 0 1 0

2000/01 235945 0 6 10 16 13 2 1 0 0 0 0

Total: 1763958 2 65 31 98 5.56E-05 82 5 4 1 0 6 0

FLANGES, 3" < D < = 11"

0.02 0.66 0.32 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.84 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00

Previous 2051652 7 51 29 87 67 7 9 2 1 1 0

1999/00 361918 1 7 3 11 8 3 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 369312 0 5 7 12 11 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2782882 8 63 39 110 3.95E-05 86 11 9 2 1 1 0

FLANGES, D < = 3"

0.07 0.57 0.35 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.78 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00

Previous 199618 4 11 6 21 18 1 0 0 0 2 0

1999/00 36302 1 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 38090 1 2 0 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0

Total: 274010 6 15 6 27 9.85E-05 23 1 0 1 0 2 0

FLANGES, D > 11"

0.22 0.56 0.22 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.85 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.00

Page 38: HSR2001

38

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 1790 2 6 1 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 315 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

2000/01 325 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2430 2 7 3 12 4.94E-03 9 1 1 0 0 0 1

HEAT EXCHANGERS, HC IN SHELL

0.17 0.58 0.25 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.75 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08

Previous 3309 1 6 2 9 7 1 0 0 0 0 1

1999/00 566 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 572 0 1 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 4447 1 7 5 13 2.92E-03 11 1 0 0 0 0 1

HEAT EXCHANGERS, HC IN TUBE

0.08 0.54 0.38 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.85 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08

Previous 1398 0 13 4 17 14 2 0 1 0 0 0

1999/00 263 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 285 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1946 0 15 5 20 1.03E-02 17 2 0 1 0 0 0

HEAT EXCHANGERS, PLATE

0.00 0.75 0.25 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.85 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 399686 26 139 74 239 187 41 5 1 1 1 3

1999/00 69889 4 24 12 40 32 8 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 70784 0 19 18 37 32 4 0 0 0 0 1

Total: 540359 30 182 104 316 5.85E-04 251 53 5 1 1 1 4

INSTRUMENTS

0.09 0.58 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.79 0.17 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01

Previous 5561 0 4 1 5 0 0 0 4 0 1 0

1999/00 879 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 879 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 7319 0 4 1 5 6.83E-04 0 0 0 4 0 1 0

MUD / SHALE PUMPS

0.00 0.80 0.20 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.20 0.00

Page 39: HSR2001

39

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 2712 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 2

1999/00 431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 431 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 3574 0 3 1 4 1.12E-03 0 0 0 1 0 1 2

MUD / SHALE SHAKERS

0.00 0.75 0.25 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50

Previous 7413 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 1187 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1187 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 9787 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MUD / SHALE TANKS

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 223 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIG LAUNCHERS, 12" < D < = 16"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 32 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 264 0 0 1 1 3.79E-03 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIG LAUNCHERS, 8" < D < = 12"

0.00 0.00 1.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 123 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIG LAUNCHERS, D < = 8"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 40: HSR2001

40

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 783 2 4 1 7 2 2 0 2 0 1 0

1999/00 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 140 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Total: 1062 2 4 3 9 8.47E-03 3 2 0 2 0 1 1

PIG LAUNCHERS, D > 16

0.22 0.44 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.33 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.11 0.11

Previous 185 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 239 0 1 1 2 8.37E-03 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

PIG RECEIVERS, 12" < D < = 16"

0.00 0.50 0.50 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00

Previous 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 21 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 182 0 1 0 1 5.49E-03 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIG RECEIVERS, 8" < D < = 12"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 193 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIG RECEIVERS, D < = 8"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 446 0 3 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1

1999/00 79 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 79 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 604 0 3 3 6 9.93E-03 4 1 0 0 0 0 1

PIG RECEIVERS, D > 16"

0.00 0.50 0.50 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.67 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17

Page 41: HSR2001

41

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 3250 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

1999/00 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 4250 1 1 0 2 4.71E-04 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

PIPELINES, FLEXIBLE, 12" < D < = 16"

0.50 0.50 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00

Previous 142853 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 23863 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 23863 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 190579 0 0 1 1 5.25E-06 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

PIPELINES, FLEXIBLE, 4" < D < = 8"

0.00 0.00 1.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

Previous 16266 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 3667 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 3667 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 23600 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIPELINES, FLEXIBLE, 8" < D < = 12"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 107675 2 1 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 17178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 17178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 142031 2 1 0 3 2.11E-05 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

PIPELINES, FLEXIBLE, D < = 4"

0.67 0.33 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.67 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 10375 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 1733 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1733 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 13841 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIPELINES, FLEXIBLE, D > 16"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 42: HSR2001

42

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 225417 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 40316 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 40316 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 306049 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIPELINES, STEEL, 12" < D < = 16"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 1067372 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 194679 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 194679 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1456730 0 4 0 4 2.75E-06 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIPELINES, STEEL, 4" < D < = 8"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 578805 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 107136 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 110036 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 795977 1 1 0 2 2.51E-06 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

PIPELINES, STEEL, 8" < D < = 12"

0.50 0.50 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00

Previous 444976 2 1 2 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0

1999/00 67148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 67148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 579272 2 1 2 5 8.63E-06 4 0 0 1 0 0 0

PIPELINES, STEEL, D < = 4"

0.40 0.20 0.40 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 639601 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 109572 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 110772 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 859945 0 0 1 1 1.16E-06 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

PIPELINES, STEEL, D > 16"

0.00 0.00 1.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 43: HSR2001

43

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 72407 2 6 2 10 6 2 1 0 0 1 0

1999/00 11945 2 3 0 5 1 3 0 1 0 0 0

2000/01 11945 1 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 96297 5 11 2 18 1.87E-04 10 5 1 1 0 1 0

PIPING, FLEXIBLE, 3" < D < = 11"

0.28 0.61 0.11 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.56 0.28 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.00

Previous 34141 4 16 11 31 14 9 4 3 0 1 0

1999/00 5442 0 1 5 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 5442 0 1 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 45025 4 18 19 41 9.11E-04 24 9 4 3 0 1 0

PIPING, FLEXIBLE, D < = 3"

0.10 0.44 0.46 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.59 0.22 0.10 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.00

Previous 6725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 924 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 924 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 8573 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PIPING, FLEXIBLE, D > 11"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 1672609 9 54 35 98 71 5 2 2 0 13 5

1999/00 285736 1 8 3 12 7 1 0 1 0 0 3

2000/01 290232 0 10 12 22 21 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2248577 10 72 50 132 5.87E-05 99 7 2 3 0 13 8

PIPING, STEEL, 3" < D < = 11"

0.08 0.55 0.38 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.75 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.10 0.06

Previous 1015444 5 100 82 187 141 26 14 2 3 0 1

1999/00 171906 2 16 18 36 30 3 1 0 1 0 1

2000/01 175117 1 18 30 49 44 5 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1362467 8 134 130 272 2.00E-04 215 34 15 2 4 0 2

PIPING, STEEL, D < = 3"

0.03 0.49 0.48 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.79 0.13 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01

Page 44: HSR2001

44

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 485568 4 16 6 26 14 3 0 0 0 6 3

1999/00 83220 0 1 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1

2000/01 86731 0 2 5 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 655519 4 19 13 36 5.49E-05 23 3 0 0 0 6 4

PIPING, STEEL, D > 11"

0.11 0.53 0.36 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.64 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.11

Previous 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 31 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, HORIZONTAL, ADSORBER

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 206 0 2 2 4 1 1 0 1 1 0 0

1999/00 30 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

2000/01 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 266 0 3 2 5 1.88E-02 1 1 0 2 1 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, HORIZONTAL, K.O.DRUM

0.00 0.60 0.40 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00

Previous 702 1 7 15 23 6 5 1 0 0 2 9

1999/00 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 151 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1004 1 8 15 24 2.39E-02 6 6 1 0 0 2 9

PRESSURE VESSEL, HORIZONTAL, OTHER

0.04 0.33 0.63 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.38

Previous 140 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 183 0 2 0 2 1.09E-02 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, HORIZONTAL, REBOILER

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 45: HSR2001

45

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 221 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 285 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, HORIZONTAL, SCRUBBER

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 2992 1 5 2 8 2 0 0 1 1 0 4

1999/00 541 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 545 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Total: 4078 1 5 3 9 2.21E-03 2 0 0 1 1 0 5

PRESSURE VESSEL, HORIZONTAL, SEPARATOR

0.11 0.56 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.56

Previous 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 104 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, HORIZONTAL, STABILISER

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 263 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 364 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, VERTICAL, ADSORBER

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 1265 0 1 3 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2

1999/00 216 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1697 0 2 3 5 2.95E-03 0 1 0 2 0 0 2

PRESSURE VESSEL, VERTICAL, K.O.DRUM

0.00 0.40 0.60 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.40

Page 46: HSR2001

46

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 988 0 2 3 5 2 2 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 233 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 237 0 3 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 0

Total: 1458 0 5 3 8 5.49E-03 2 2 2 0 0 2 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, VERTICAL, OTHER

0.00 0.63 0.38 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00

Previous 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 45 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, VERTICAL, REBOILER

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 2166 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 388 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 402 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2956 0 3 0 3 1.01E-03 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, VERTICAL , SCRUBBER

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1984 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 323 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 327 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2634 0 1 3 4 1.52E-03 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, VERTICAL, SEPARATOR

0.00 0.25 0.75 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 114 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PRESSURE VESSEL, VERTICAL, STABILISER

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 47: HSR2001

47

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 4890 0 16 16 32 26 4 0 0 0 0 2

1999/00 867 0 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 867 0 4 1 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 6624 0 22 18 40 6.04E-03 33 5 0 0 0 0 2

PUMPS, CENTRIFUGAL, DOUBLE SEAL

0.00 0.55 0.45 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.83 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05

Previous 3265 0 6 11 17 14 2 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 593 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 599 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 4457 0 7 16 23 5.16E-03 20 2 1 0 0 0 0

PUMPS, CENTRIFUGAL, SINGLE SEAL

0.00 0.30 0.70 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.87 0.09 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 930 0 4 4 8 6 1 0 0 1 0 0

1999/00 149 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1230 0 5 5 10 8.13E-03 8 1 0 0 1 0 0

PUMPS, RECIPROCATING, DOUBLE SEAL

0.00 0.50 0.50 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.80 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00

Previous 562 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

1999/00 99 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 760 0 2 1 3 3.95E-03 2 0 0 0 1 0 0

PUMPS, RECIPROCATING, SINGLE SEAL

0.00 0.67 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00

Previous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RECOMMPRESSORS

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 48: HSR2001

48

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 435 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 725 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RISERS, FLEXIBLE, 12" < D < =16"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 58298 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 10780 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 10780 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 79858 0 1 0 1 1.25E-05 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

RISERS, FLEXIBLE, 4" < D < = 8"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

Previous 16001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 6915 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 6915 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 29831 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RISERS, FLEXIBLE, 8" < D < = 12"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 18958 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 3211 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 3211 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 25380 0 1 0 1 3.94E-05 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

RISERS, FLEXIBLE, D < = 4"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 5754 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 885 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 885 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 7524 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RISERS, FLEXIBLE, D > 16"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 49: HSR2001

49

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 50614 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 8797 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 8797 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 68208 0 1 0 1 1.47E-05 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

RISERS, STEEL, 12" < D < = 16"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 282354 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 45119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 45119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 372592 0 1 0 1 2.68E-06 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

RISERS, STEEL, 4" < D < = 8"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 53723 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 9377 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 9852 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 72952 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RISERS, STEEL, 8" < D < = 12"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 61801 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 9140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 9140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 80081 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RISERS, STEEL, D < = 4"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 120542 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0

1999/00 21165 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 21385 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 163092 1 1 1 3 1.84E-05 0 0 0 0 0 3 0

RISERS, STEEL, D > 16"

0.33 0.33 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

Page 50: HSR2001

50

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 332 1 8 15 24 20 0 0 0 0 0 4

1999/00 55 0 2 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 3

2000/01 55 1 1 2 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0

Total: 442 2 11 19 32 7.24E-02 23 1 1 0 0 0 7

TURBINES, DUAL FUEL

0.06 0.34 0.59 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.72 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22

Previous 611 0 11 7 18 10 3 0 1 0 1 3

1999/00 103 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

2000/01 110 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 824 0 12 10 22 2.67E-02 13 3 0 1 0 2 3

TURBINES, GAS

0.00 0.55 0.45 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.59 0.14 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.09 0.14

Previous 21320 1 5 5 11 9 1 0 0 1 0 0

1999/00 3768 0 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 3831 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 28919 1 8 6 15 5.19E-04 13 1 0 0 1 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, BLOCK, 3" < D < = 11"

0.07 0.53 0.40 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.87 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00

Previous 12783 1 12 8 21 14 2 3 0 0 0 2

1999/00 2105 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 2135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 17023 1 13 8 22 1.29E-03 15 2 3 0 0 0 2

VALVE, ACTUATED, BLOCK, D <= 3"

0.05 0.59 0.36 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.68 0.09 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09

Previous 5465 0 4 1 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 980 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 7460 0 5 1 6 8.04E-04 5 1 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, BLOCK, D > 11"

0.00 0.83 0.17 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.83 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 51: HSR2001

51

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 2502 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 459 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 474 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 3435 0 1 0 1 2.91E-04 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, BLOWDOWN, 3" < D < = 11"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 5262 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 903 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 932 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 7097 0 0 2 2 2.82E-04 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, BLOWDOWN, D < = 3"

0.00 0.00 1.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 274 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, BLOWDOWN, D > 11"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 8497 3 3 3 9 7 0 2 0 0 0 0

1999/00 1377 0 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 11264 3 5 4 12 1.07E-03 10 0 2 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, CHOKE, 3" < D < = 11"

0.25 0.42 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.83 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 10522 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 2923 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 2923 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 16368 0 1 0 1 6.11E-05 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, CHOKE, D < = 3"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 52: HSR2001

52

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 91 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, CHOKE, D > 11"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 17508 1 14 3 18 13 0 3 0 0 2 0

1999/00 3103 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 3138 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 23749 1 15 3 19 8.00E-04 14 0 3 0 0 2 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, CONTROL, 3" < D < = 11"

0.05 0.79 0.16 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.74 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00

Previous 19568 1 13 10 24 17 1 3 1 0 0 2

1999/00 3332 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 3364 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 26264 1 14 13 28 1.07E-03 21 1 3 1 0 0 2

VALVE, ACTUATED, CONTROL, D < =3"

0.04 0.50 0.46 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.75 0.04 0.11 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.07

Previous 2613 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 456 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 484 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 3553 0 3 0 3 8.44E-04 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, CONTROL, D > 11"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 20665 1 4 4 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 3609 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 3690 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 27964 2 5 6 13 4.65E-04 12 1 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, ESDV, 3" < D < = 11"

0.15 0.38 0.46 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.92 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 53: HSR2001

53

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 14969 1 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 0

1999/00 2545 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 2654 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 20168 1 3 0 4 1.98E-04 3 0 0 0 1 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, ESDV, < = 3"

0.25 0.75 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00

Previous 5197 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 879 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 930 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 7006 0 2 0 2 2.85E-04 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, ESDV, D > 11"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 528 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 694 1 0 0 1 1.44E-03 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, 12" < D < = 16"

1.00 0.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1058 0 2 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1392 0 2 1 3 2.16E-03 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, 4" < D < = 8"

0.00 0.67 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.67 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 851 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1182 0 1 0 1 8.46E-04 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, 8" < D < = 12"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 54: HSR2001

54

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 1136 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

1999/00 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1478 0 2 0 2 1.35E-03 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, D < = 4"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00

Previous 1279 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 229 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1735 0 2 0 2 1.15E-03 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L ESDV, D > 16"

0.00 1.00 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 608 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 642 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, 4" < D < = 8"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 116 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 342 0 0 1 1 2.92E-03 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, 12" < D < = 16"

0.00 0.00 1.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 248 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 326 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, 8" < D < = 12"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 55: HSR2001

55

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 285 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 371 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, D < = 4"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 235 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, P/L SSIV ASSY, D > 16"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 10344 0 11 2 13 9 2 1 0 0 1 0

1999/00 1823 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1873 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 14040 0 12 2 14 9.97E-04 10 2 1 0 0 1 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, RELIEF, 3" < D < = 11"

0.00 0.86 0.14 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.71 0.14 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00

Previous 26474 1 9 8 18 13 5 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 4527 0 6 2 8 5 3 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 4575 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 35576 1 15 11 27 7.59E-04 19 8 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, RELIEF, D < = 3"

0.04 0.56 0.41 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.70 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 239 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 323 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, ACTUATED, RELIEF, D > 11"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 56: HSR2001

56

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 171461 0 12 5 17 5 8 2 0 0 1 1

1999/00 29378 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 29571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 230410 0 14 5 19 8.25E-05 7 8 2 0 0 1 1

VALVE, MANUAL, BLEED.

0.00 0.74 0.26 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.37 0.42 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05

Previous 211601 1 23 2 26 19 3 2 0 0 1 1

1999/00 37031 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 37196 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 285828 1 26 4 31 1.08E-04 24 3 2 0 0 1 1

VALVE, MANUAL, BLOCK, 3" < D < = 11"

0.03 0.84 0.13 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.77 0.10 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03

Previous 506244 4 17 11 32 18 9 1 4 0 0 0

1999/01 89516 0 2 5 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 90635 2 4 3 9 7 1 1 0 0 0 0

Total: 686395 6 23 19 48 6.99E-05 31 11 2 4 0 0 0

VALVE, MANUAL, BLOCK, D < = 3

0.13 0.48 0.40 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.65 0.23 0.04 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 20645 0 6 2 8 6 0 2 0 0 0 0

1999/00 3551 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 3664 0 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 27860 0 8 3 11 3.95E-04 9 0 2 0 0 0 0

VALVE, MANUAL, BLOCK, D > 11"

0.00 0.73 0.27 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.82 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 27088 1 3 1 5 1 0 1 1 0 2 0

1999/00 4722 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 4773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 36583 1 3 2 6 1.64E-04 2 0 1 1 0 2 0

VALVE, MANUAL, CHECK, 3" < D < = 11"

0.17 0.50 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.33 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.33 0.00

Page 57: HSR2001

57

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 28727 1 1 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 4803 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 4853 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 38383 1 1 3 5 1.30E-04 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, MANUAL, CHECK, D < = 3"

0.20 0.20 0.60 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 4165 1 5 0 6 5 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 725 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 764 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 5654 1 5 0 6 1.06E-03 5 0 1 0 0 0 0

VALVE, MANUAL, CHECK, D > 11"

0.17 0.83 0.00 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.83 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 4776 1 3 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 827 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 827 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 6430 1 3 1 5 7.78E-04 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, MANUAL, CHOKE, 3" < D < = 11"

0.20 0.60 0.20 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Prev ious 6201 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 975 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 975 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 8151 0 1 2 3 3.68E-04 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, MANUAL, CHOKE, D < = 3"

0.00 0.33 0.67 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 110 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VALVE, MANUAL, CHOKE, D > 11"

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 58: HSR2001

58

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 2274 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 375 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 375 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 3024 1 1 1 3 9.92E-04 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

WELLHEADS, 5000 psi < P < = 10000 psi (690 bar)

0.33 0.33 0.33 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.67 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 1572 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1572 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 3346 0 0 0 0 Note 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELLHEADS, P > 10000 psi (690 bar)

0 0 0 < DISTRIBUTION > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Previous 8997 3 12 5 20 14 5 0 1 0 0 0

1999/00 32 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 45 0 4 3 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 9074 3 16 9 28 3.09E-03 20 7 0 1 0 0 0

WELLHEADS, P < = 5000 psi (345 bar)

0.11 0.57 0.32 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.71 0.25 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1581 1 8 0 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 267 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 267 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 2115 1 9 1 11 5.20E-03 10 1 0 0 0 0 0

XMAS TREES, 5000 psi < P < = 10000 psi (690 bar)

0.09 0.82 0.09 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.91 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 9541 4 38 2 44 35 6 1 0 0 2 0

1999/00 1655 0 3 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1655 0 3 3 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 12851 4 44 6 54 4.20E-03 45 6 1 0 0 2 0

XMAS TREES, P < = 5000 psi (345 bar)

0.07 0.81 0.11 < DISTRIBUTION > 0.83 0.11 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00

Page 59: HSR2001

59

TABLE 2 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES & SEVERITY / HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

EQUIPMENT (ALL TYPES)

MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR TOTAL <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A (note 3) EQTYEARS

Overall rate may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain rate for leaks of different severities.

RATE (PER YEAR)

(Note 2)

Leak rate may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain rate for various hole sizes. NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October 1992 to 31 March 1999 2. Rate = Total Leaks divided by Total Eqt.Years. If no leaks reported, then Rate is not calculated. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

YEAR (Note 1)

CAUTION : DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER.

Previous 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 32 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 45 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 279 0 2 2 4 1.43E-02 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

XMAS TREES, P > 10000 psi (690 bar)

0.00 0.50 0.50 < DISTRIBUTION > 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 60: HSR2001

60

Page 61: HSR2001

61

TABLE 3 : DRILLING/WELL OPERATIONS : SEVERITY & HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ACTIVITY

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) YEAR (Note 1)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.

TOTAL (Note 2)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October

1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where

open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.

CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER

Previous 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

DRILLING EXPLORATION, OIL WELL, 100 - 700 METRES

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00

Previous 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

DRILLING, APPRAISAL, OIL WELL, <100 METRES

0.50 0.50 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

DRILLING, COMPLETION, GAS WELL, 100 - 700 METRES

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

DRILLING, COMPLETION, GAS WELL, <100 METRES

0.50 0.00 0.50 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

Previous 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 2

1999/00 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Total: 0 7 0 7 2 0 1 0 0 1 3

DRILLING, COMPLETION, OIL WELL, 100 - 700 METRES

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.29 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.43

Page 62: HSR2001

62

TABLE 3 : DRILLING/WELL OPERATIONS : SEVERITY & HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ACTIVITY

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) YEAR (Note 1)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.

TOTAL (Note 2)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October

1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where

open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.

CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER

Previous 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

DRILLING, COMPLETION, OIL WELL, <100 METRES

0.50 0.50 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00

Previous 0 6 3 9 7 1 0 0 1 0 0

1999/00 0 1 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 0

2000/01 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 7 7 14 11 1 0 0 1 1 0

DRILLING, DEVELOPMENT, GAS WELL, <100 METRES

0.00 0.50 0.50 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.79 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00

Previous 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

DRILLING, DEVELOPMENT, GAS WELL, 100 - 700 METRES

0.00 0.00 1.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 2 8 1 11 3 0 1 0 1 3 3

1999/00 0 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 2

2000/01 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

Total: 2 10 5 17 4 1 1 0 1 3 7

DRILLING, DEVELOPMENT, OIL WELL, 100 - 700 METRES

0.12 0.59 0.29 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.24 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.18 0.41

Previous 1 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

DRILLING, DEVELOPMENT, OIL WELL, <100 METRES

0.33 0.67 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 63: HSR2001

63

TABLE 3 : DRILLING/WELL OPERATIONS : SEVERITY & HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ACTIVITY

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) YEAR (Note 1)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.

TOTAL (Note 2)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October

1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where

open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.

CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER

Previous 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

DRILLING, EXPLORATION, GAS WELL, <100 METRES

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

Previous 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

DRILLING, EXPLORATION, GAS WELL, 100-700 METRES

1.00 0.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

WELL OPS, ABANDONMENT, GAS WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.00 0.50 0.50 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 0 1 3 4 1 0 0 2 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 4 5 2 0 0 2 0 1 0

WELL OPS, ABANDONMENT, OIL WELL, WITH TREE

0.00 0.20 0.80 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.20 0.00

Previous 0 3 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 2

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 3 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 2

WELL OPS, ABANDONMENT, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.00 0.75 0.25 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50

Page 64: HSR2001

64

TABLE 3 : DRILLING/WELL OPERATIONS : SEVERITY & HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ACTIVITY

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) YEAR (Note 1)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.

TOTAL (Note 2)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October

1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where

open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.

CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER

Previous 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

WELL OPS, COILED TUBING, GAS WELL, WITH TREE

0.50 0.00 0.50 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL OPS, COILED TUBING, GAS WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.00 0.00 1.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1 7 5 13 9 1 2 0 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 8 6 15 11 1 2 0 0 1 0

WELL OPS, COILED TUBING, OIL WELL, WITH TREE

0.07 0.53 0.40 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.73 0.07 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00

Previous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL OPS, COILED TUBING, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.00 0.00 1.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 0

WELL OPS, OTHER, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00

Page 65: HSR2001

65

TABLE 3 : DRILLING/WELL OPERATIONS : SEVERITY & HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ACTIVITY

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) YEAR (Note 1)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.

TOTAL (Note 2)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October

1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where

open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.

CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER

Previous 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

WELL OPS, RE-COMPLETION, GAS WELL, WITHOUT TREE

1.00 0.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

Previous 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

WELL OPS, RE-COMPLETION, OIL WELL, WITH TREE

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00

Previous 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0

WELL OPS, RE-COMPLETION, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.00 0.33 0.67 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00

Previous 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL OPS, SNUBBING, GAS WELL WITHOUT TREE

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL OPS, SNUBBING, OIL WELL WITH TREE

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 66: HSR2001

66

TABLE 3 : DRILLING/WELL OPERATIONS : SEVERITY & HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ACTIVITY

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) YEAR (Note 1)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.

TOTAL (Note 2)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October

1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where

open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.

CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER

Previous 0 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 1 8 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL OPS, WELL TEST, GAS WELL WITHOUT TREE

0.00 0.11 0.89 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 0 2 2 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

2000/01 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 4 2 6 4 0 1 0 1 0 0

WELL OPS, WELL TEST, GAS WELL, WITH TREE

0.00 0.67 0.33 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.67 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00

Previous 1 3 2 6 0 0 1 1 1 0 3

1999/00 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2000/01 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 4 3 8 0 1 1 1 1 0 4

WELL OPS, WELL TEST, OIL WELL, WITH TREE

0.13 0.50 0.38 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.50

Previous 0 3 3 6 2 0 0 1 1 1 1

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1 0 2 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 3 5 9 3 2 0 1 1 1 1

WELL OPS, WELL TEST, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.11 0.33 0.56 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.33 0.22 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11

Previous 1 7 1 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 1 7 1 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL OPS, WIRELINE, GAS WELL, WITH TREE

0.11 0.78 0.11 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 67: HSR2001

67

TABLE 3 : DRILLING/WELL OPERATIONS : SEVERITY & HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS SEVERITY DISTRIBUTION HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION ACTIVITY

(ALL TYPES) MAJOR SIGNIFICANT MINOR <10 mm 10<25 mm 25<50 mm 50<75 mm 75<100 mm >=100 mm N/A

(note 3) YEAR (Note 1)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by the severity distribution factor shown to obtain proportion of leaks of different severities.

TOTAL (Note 2)

Overall leaks may be multiplied by hole size distribution factor to obtain proportion of various hole sizes.

NOTES: 1. Previous = Total for all previous years from 1 October

1992 to 31 March 1999 2. List excludes those items with zero releases. 3. Hole size is not applicable for some scenarios e.g. where

open vessels such as shale shakers are involved or for liquid carry -over incidents, etc.

4. Suitable population data is not available to calculate failure rates for drilling and well operation activities.

CAUTION: DO NOT USE SEVERITY AND HOLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FACTORS TOGETHER

Previous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1999/00 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

WELL OPS, WIRELINE, GAS WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.00 1.00 0.00 <DISTRIBUTION> 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Previous 1 16 7 24 12 6 3 0 2 1 0

1999/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 1 1 1 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0

Total: 2 17 8 27 14 6 3 1 2 1 0

WELL OPS, WIRELINE, OIL WELL, WITH TREE

0.07 0.63 0.30 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.52 0.22 0.11 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.00

Previous 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0

1999/00 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

2000/01 0 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total: 0 3 3 6 5 0 0 0 0 1 0

WELL OPS, WIRELINE, OIL WELL, WITHOUT TREE

0.00 0.50 0.50 <DISTRIBUTION> 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00

Page 68: HSR2001

68

Table 4 : HYDROCARBON TYPE versus SEVERITY OF RELEASE

SEVERITY HYD TYPE

92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 TOTAL

LIQUID 1 4 1 2 3 1 2 0 0 14 GAS 9 16 16 12 14 6 8 11 7 99

2-PHASE 2 4 3 6 2 6 5 1 1 30 MAJOR

TOTAL 12 24 20 20 19 13 15 12 8 143 LIQUID 12 32 53 30 40 40 31 35 28 301

GAS 34 96 132 86 74 79 85 79 74 739 2-PHASE 4 22 9 18 15 20 18 12 15 133

SIGNIFICANT

TOTAL 50 150 194 134 129 139 134 126 117 1173 LIQUID 9 53 56 34 54 37 53 47 79 422

GAS 10 41 51 24 20 29 31 46 60 312 2-PHASE 0 3 4 0 4 0 1 3 6 21

MINOR

TOTAL 19 97 111 58 78 66 85 96 145 755 LIQUID 22 89 110 66 97 78 86 82 107 737

GAS 53 153 199 122 108 114 124 136 141 1150 2-PHASE 6 29 16 24 21 26 24 16 22 184

ALL

TOTAL 81 271 325 212 226 218 234 234 270 2071

Page 69: HSR2001

69

Table 5 : INSTALLATION TYPE/LOCATION versus RELEASE TYPE & SEVERITY

NOTES : 1. Data covers the period from 1st October, 1992 to 31st March, 2001. 2. Northern Area (N) = 590 N Latitude and above. Central Area (C) = between 560 N Latitude and 590 N Latitude. Southern Area (S) = 560 N Latitude and below. (incl. Irish Sea and English Channel) 3. COUNT of fixed installation types comprises all installations of that type operating in that area of the UKCS as at 31st March 2001. 4. COUNT of mobile installations comprises known fleet operating in UK waters during 2000/2001. 5. COUNT of subsea installations comprises all known installations that have operated in the UKCS as at 31 March 2001, excluding

single well satellite/tie-backs. Because of the small number of subsea releases, no calculation of subsea installation years has been undertaken.

6. YEARS = estimated number of installation years (as at 31st March 2001) including those for installations abandoned since 1st October 1992. 7. FPS includes FPSO and FSU. 8. Maj = Major release Sig = Significant release Min = Minor release (Please refer to APPENDIX 2 for definitions of severity) 9. Failure rates may be calculated by dividing Release Type TOTALS by Installation YEARS.

Page 70: HSR2001

70

Table 5 : INSTALLATION TYPE/LOCATION versus RELEASE TYPE AND SEVERITY

INSTALLATION RELEASE TYPE 00/01 POPULATION LIQUIDS GAS 2-PHASE TYPE COUNT YEARS Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min

TOTALS

(1) FIXED = 1994 or 96.3 % of TOTAL RELEASES MANNED 31 250.6 3 73 121 21 238 105 9 56 12 638 NORTHERN

FIXED NUI 3 25.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MANNED 43 296.8 1 97 166 27 234 97 7 45 5 679 CENTRAL

FIXED NUI 11 66.8 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 6 MANNED 76 585.2 2 29 45 18 95 37 0 3 0 229 SOUTHERN

FIXED NUI 95 652.0 2 21 8 19 47 11 2 2 0 112 FPS 25 113.9 2 64 68 10 104 42 7 22 4 323

SUBSEA 40 - 0 0 0 1 3 1 2 0 0 7 TOTAL 324 - 10 284 411 96 721 295 27 129 21 1994

(2) MOBILES = 77 or 3.7 % of TOTAL RELEASES N 3 7 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 16 C 0 5 3 1 5 1 2 3 0 20

SEMI-SUB

S 21 138.3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 1 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 8

JACK-UP

S 16 111.3

0 5 4 0 9 15 0 0 0 33 TOTAL 37 - 4 17 11 3 18 17 3 4 0 77

GRAND TOTAL 361 - 14 301 422 99 739 312 30 133 21 2071

Page 71: HSR2001

71

Table 6 : IGNITIONS SUMMARY (1)

HYDROCARBON TYPE & SEVERITY LIQUIDS GAS 2-PHASE YEAR DETAILS

Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min TOTAL

0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 12 9 9 34 10 2 4 0 81

1992/93

(2)

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 8.3 22.2 0 2.9 0 0 0 0 4.9 0 7 10 0 4 5 0 0 0 26 4 32 53 16 96 41 4 22 3 271 1993/94

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 21.9 18.9 0 4.2 12.2 0 0 0 9.6 0 5 15 0 1 3 0 0 0 24 1 53 56 16 132 51 3 9 4 325 1994/95

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 9.4 26.8 0 0.8 5.9 0 0 0 7.4 0 1 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 9 2 30 34 12 86 24 6 18 0 212 1995/96

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 3.3 17.6 0 1.2 4.2 0 0 0 4.2 0 4 10 0 2 2 0 0 0 18 3 40 54 14 74 20 2 15 4 226 1996/97

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 10 18.5 0 2.7 10 0 0 0 8 0 0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 9 1 40 37 6 79 29 6 20 0 218 1997/98

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 0 8.1 0 3.8 10.3 0 0 0 4.1 0 3 9 0 3 3 0 0 0 18 2 31 53 8 85 31 5 18 1 234 1998/99

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 9.7 17 0 3.5 9.7 0 0 0 7.7 0 2 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 10 0 35 47 11 79 46 1 12 3 234 1999/00

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 5.7 8.5 0 0 8.7 0 0 0 4.3 0 1 8 0 1 3 0 0 0 13 0 28 79 7 74 60 1 15 6 270

2000/01

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 3.6 10.1 0 1.4 5.0 0 0 0 4.8 0 24 67 0 16 24 0 0 0 131

14 301 422 99 739 312 30 133 21 2071 ALL YEARS

IGNITIONS RELEASES

% (3) 0 8.0 15.9 0 2.2 7.7 0 0 0 6.3 Notes: (1) Total numbers in Hydrocarbon releases database for the period 01-10-92 TO 31-03-01 (2) 6 months period from 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 (3) No. of Ignitions ÷ No. of Releases = % Ignited NB: This is NOT an Ignition probability (4) Full details of all Ignitions are given in Tables 7 a, b, and c.

Page 72: HSR2001

72

Page 73: HSR2001

73

Table 7 : IGNITION DETAILS NOTES : 1. The following table contains detailed information on all of the ignitions which have been reported and recorded in the Hydrocarbon Releases Database between 1 October, 1992 and 31 March, 2001. 2. The table is in three parts : (a) Release parameters (b) Mode of Operation/ignition sources and sequences (c) Detection modes and emergency actions 3. Each ignition has a reference number, and so it is possible to read all the details supplied for any one incident by referring to its unique reference number in each of the three parts.

Page 74: HSR2001

*where C=Central, S=Southern, N=Northern areas, F=Fixed, MS=Semisub, MJ=Jackup 74 **N/A signifies holesize not applicable to mode of release

Table 7(a) : IGNITIONS - RELEASE PARAMETERS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type Severity System Type* of

Installation Gravity/ Density (kgs/m3)

Amount Released

(kgs) @Actual Pressure

(barg) Release Duration (mins)

Equivalent

Hole** (mm)

1992/93 1 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Oil, Heat Transfer Oil CF 799.12 6.00 3.72 1.00 3.00 2 Oil Minor Export, Oil CF 799.12 47.90 0.00 5.00 508.00 3 Oil Significant Separation, Oil Test CF 839.08 266.78 4.14 15.00 N/A 4 Gas Significant Utilities, Gas, Fuel Gas SF 9.00 54.00 10.00 30.00 5.00 Total = 4 1993/94 5 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Gas Compression CF 876.04 876.04 3.45 20.00 25.00

6 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Gas Compression CF 799.12 3.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 7 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Gas Compression CF 799.12 0.16 5.00 5.00 1.00 8 Non Process Methanol Significant Manifold, Other, (Condensate,

Methanol, Etc) SMJ 799.12 525.00 0.00 5.00 50.80

9 Non Process Methanol Minor Processing, Gas, Chemical Injection NF 799.12 0.80 0.00 5.00 25.40 10 Non Process Glycol Significant Processing, Gas, Dehydration SF 1123.76 766.20 0.07 300.00 10.00 11 Non Process Glycol Significant Processing, Gas, Dehydration SF 799.12 588.00 1.03 10.00 12.70 12 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NF 799.12 7.26 0.00 10.00 N/A 13 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NF 799.12 3.63 0.00 0.50 N/A 14 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NF 799.12 18.16 0.00 10.00 6.70 15 Non Process Diesel Significant Utilities, Oil, diesel CF 799.12 132.00 0.00 5.00 25.40 16 Non Process Heat Trans Oil Significant Utilities, Oil, Heat Transfer Oil CF 799.12 1044.00 10.34 10.00 9.53 17 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Oil, Power Gen Turbines CF 877.03 1.00 3.93 2.00 1.00 18 Oil Significant Separation, Oil Production CF 839.08 666.94 4.14 20.00 N/A 19 Oil Minor Separation, Oil Test CF 799.12 3.63 0.00 1.00 12.70 20 Condensate Minor Flare, HP CF 599.34 10.00 10.00 5.00 76.20 21 Condensate Minor Processing, Gas, LPG/Condensate SF 599.34 27.00 0.00 5.00 12.70 22 Gas Minor Flowlines, Oil CF 74.60 0.60 75.86 1.00 1.00 23 Gas Minor Utilities, Gas, Fuel Gas NF 12.70 0.03 12.41 0.25 1.00 24 Gas Significant Utilities, Gas, Fuel Gas CF 1.60 153.00 1.00 17.00 25.40 25 Gas Significant Utilities, Gas, Fuel Gas SF 1.60 210.00 1.00 10.00 38.10 26 Gas Significant Vent, HP SF 0.78 41.10 0.00 0.25 152.40 27 Gas Minor Vent, HP SF 0.80 0.04 0.00 6.00 1.00 28 Gas Minor Vent, HP SF 0.80 0.06 0.00 8.00 1.00 29 Gas Minor Vent, HP SF 0.80 0.06 0.00 8.00 1.00 30 Gas Significant Vent, LP SF 0.80 210.00 0.00 5.00 76.20 Total = 26 1994/95 31 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Export, Oil NF 799.12 36.00 100.00 10.00 1.00

Page 75: HSR2001

*where C=Central, S=Southern, N=Northern areas, F=Fixed, MS=Semisub, MJ=Jackup 75 **N/A signifies holesize not applicable to mode of release

Table 7(a) : IGNITIONS - RELEASE PARAMETERS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type Severity System Type* of

Installation Gravity/ Density (kgs/m3)

Amount Released

(kgs) @Actual Pressure

(barg) Release Duration (mins)

Equivalent

Hole** (mm)

32 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Export, Oil CF 799.12 3.63 0.00 5.00 N/A 33 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Gas Compression CF 799.12 964.80 70.00 2.00 12.70 34 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Gas Compression SF 799.12 3.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 35 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Gas Compression NF 799.12 3.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 35 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Gas Compression NF 799.12 3.00 5.00 5.00 1.00 36 Non Process Diesel Minor Gas Compression CF 799.12 7.26 5.00 30.00 N/A 37 Non Process Glycol Minor Processing, Gas, Chemical Injection SF 799.12 6.00 5.00 2.00 2.00 38 Non Process Glycol Minor Processing, Gas, Dehydration SF 1048.85 4.30 0.07 36.00 1.00 39 Non Process Glycol Minor Processing, Gas, Dehydration SF 799.12 22.00 1.03 60.00 1.00 40 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines SMJ 799.12 18.00 30.00 10.00 1.00 41 Non Process Fuel Oil Significant Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NMS 799.12 141.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 42 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel NF 799.12 3.63 0.00 30.00 N/A 43 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Oil, Heat Transfer Oil CF 799.12 0.30 4.80 1.00 1.00 44 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Oil, Heat Transfer Oil CF 799.12 10.90 4.83 3.00 1.80 45 Non Process Heli-Fuel Minor Utilities, Oil, Heli-Fuel / Jet-Fuel CMJ 799.12 0.60 0.00 15.00 1.00 46 Non Process Diesel Significant Utilities, Oil, Power Gen Turbines CF 835.00 835.00 30.00 3.00 11.80 47 Non Process Diesel Significant Utilities, Oil, Power Gen Turbines CF 835.00 835.00 30.00 3.00 11.80 48 Oil Significant Utilities, Oil, Power Gen Turbines NMS 799.12 7291.20 250.00 2.00 25.40 49 Condensate Minor Flare, HP CF 799.12 10.00 0.00 5.00 N/A 50 Condensate Minor Processing, Gas, Sour (H2S/CO2)

Treatment CF 599.34 5.99 5.00 0.50 25.40

51 Gas Significant Flare, HP NF 1.50 40.50 0.79 165.00 N/A 52 Gas Minor Gas Compression NF 4.90 0.20 5.00 5.00 1.00 53 Gas Minor Utilities, Oil, Heat Transfer Oil NF 9.00 0.10 10.00 1.00 1.00 54 Gas Minor Vent, LP NF 1.00 0.10 0.01 1.00 3.90 Total = 24 1995/96 55 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Gas Compression CF 859.05 0.20 0.00 15.00 1.00

56 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Gas Compression NF 869.04 60.83 10.00 7.00 2.70 57 Non Process Glycol Minor Processing, Gas, Dehydration CF 799.12 29.30 0.00 720.00 1.00 58 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines CF 835.00 0.84 30.00 5.00 1.00 59 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, diesel CF 835.00 0.84 30.00 0.08 2.30 60 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Oil, Heat Transfer Oil NF 799.12 0.08 5.00 1.00 1.00 61 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Oil, Heat Transfer Oil CF 884.03 7.00 0.00 16.00 38.10 62 Gas Significant Processing, Gas, LPG/Condensate SF 1.20 14.40 0.69 8.00 12.70

Page 76: HSR2001

*where C=Central, S=Southern, N=Northern areas, F=Fixed, MS=Semisub, MJ=Jackup 76 **N/A signifies holesize not applicable to mode of release

Table 7(a) : IGNITIONS - RELEASE PARAMETERS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type Severity System Type* of

Installation Gravity/ Density (kgs/m3)

Amount Released

(kgs) @Actual Pressure

(barg) Release Duration (mins)

Equivalent

Hole** (mm)

63 Gas Minor Vent, LP CF 1.00 0.50 0.00 2.00 6.00 Total = 9 1996/97 64 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Export, Oil CF 799.12 0.40 17.24 7.00 1.00

65 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines CF 799.12 79.91 2.40 5.00 5.40 66 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines CF 799.12 1.60 9.00 1.30 1.00 67 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel SMJ 849.07 0.85 2.00 3.00 1.00 68 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel NF 849.07 0.85 2.07 2.00 1.00 69 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel NF 799.12 0.80 0.00 2.00 12.70 70 Non Process Diesel Significant Utilities, Oil, Diesel NF 799.12 150.00 103.45 8.00 12.70 71 Non Process Diesel Significant Utilities, Oil, Diesel NF 799.12 70.00 103.45 32.00 12.70 72 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 0.40 23.00 1.00 1.00 72 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 0.40 23.00 1.00 1.00 73 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 0.80 0.00 20.00 1.00 74 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Gas Compression NF 799.12 15.98 1.75 1.00 N/A 75 Oil Significant Flare, HP CF 799.12 127.04 0.17 3.00 N/A 76 Condensate Minor Gas Compression SF 599.34 2.72 0.00 0.50 N/A 77 Condensate Minor Import, Gas SF 699.23 0.70 0.00 1.00 1.00 78 Gas Minor Drains, Closed CF 0.70 0.07 0.00 2.00 N/A 79 Gas Minor Drilling, Development, Gas Well,

<100 Metres SF 0.80 0.80 0.00 1.00 9.10

80 Gas Significant Processing, Gas, Sour (H2S/CO2) Treatment

CF 0.80 2.00 0.00 1.00 203.20

81 Gas Significant Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NF 9.00 5.00 10.00 2.00 N/A Total = 18 1997/98 82 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilites, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 0.80 50.00 2.00 1.00

83 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilites, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 10.00 16.70 3.00 84 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilites, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 5.00 68.97 5.00 1.00 85 Gas Minor Drilling, Development, Gas Well,

<100 Metres SF 68.25 0.15 82.89 0.25 1.00

86 Gas Minor Export, Oil CF 0.80 0.90 0.00 0.50 25.40 87 Gas Minor Import, Oil NF 0.85 0.10 0.00 0.10 25.00 88 Gas Significant Metering, Oil NF 0.70 6.00 0.00 5.00 12.70 89 Gas Significant Processing, Gas, LPG/Condensate NF 52.20 121.90 49.00 300.00 1.00 90 Gas Significant Utilities, Gas, Fuel Gas NF 9.00 25.50 10.00 0.50 25.40 Total = 9

Page 77: HSR2001

*where C=Central, S=Southern, N=Northern areas, F=Fixed, MS=Semisub, MJ=Jackup 77 **N/A signifies holesize not applicable to mode of release

Table 7(a) : IGNITIONS - RELEASE PARAMETERS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type Severity System Type* of

Installation Gravity/ Density (kgs/m3)

Amount Released

(kgs) @Actual Pressure

(barg) Release Duration (mins)

Equivalent

Hole** (mm)

1998/99 91 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Gas Compression NF 869.04 465.00 100.00 5.00 5.00 92 Non Process Glycol Minor Processing, Gas, Dehydration SF 799.12 1.20 10.34 1.00 1.00 93 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NF 799.12 7.10 1.75 15.00 1.00 94 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NF 799.12 2.40 1.75 5.00 1.00 95 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines CF 799.12 180.00 1.75 15.00 5.00 96 Non Process Hydraulic Oil Significant Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines CF 799.12 163.82 81.00 5.00 3.20 97 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines CF 799.12 9.00 3.00 15.00 1.00 98 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 0.05 5.00 0.08 1.00 99 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 0.80 82.80 3.00 1.00 100 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 0.00 9.00 5.00 1.00 101 Oil Minor Processing, Gas, Dehydration NF 799.12 5.00 0.00 1.00 N/A 102 Condensate Minor Processing, Gas, Dehydration CF 599.34 0.20 0.00 5.00 N/A 103 Gas Minor Drains, Closed NF 0.80 0.90 0.00 0.50 457.20 104 Gas Significant Export, Oil CF 0.68 1.00 0.00 0.50 N/A 105 Gas Minor Separation, Oil Test CF 0.80 0.10 0.00 0.50 N/A 106 Gas Significant Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines CF 9.00 5.00 10.00 2.00 N/A 107 Gas Significant Vent, HP NF 0.75 0.03 0.00 5.00 1.00 108 Gas Minor Vent, LP NF 0.80 0.10 0.00 13.80 1.00 Total = 18 1999/00 109 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NF 799.12 1.00 5.00 4.00 N/A

110 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 11.99 124.00 4.50 1.40 111 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel NF 799.12 1.60 3.45 10.00 1.00 112 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 31.96 124.00 4.00 1.40 113 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Utilities, Oil, Power Gen Turbines NF 849.07 85.00 10.00 20.00 1.90 114 Condensate Significant Flare, LP CF 471.00 100.00 8.50 2.00 N/A 115 Gas Minor Export, Oil CF 0.80 0.80 0.00 1.00 9.10 116 Gas Minor Manifold, Oil CF 1.20 0.09 0.14 10.00 1.00 117 Gas Minor Utilities, Gas, Fuel Gas NF 3.20 0.01 2.62 0.06 N/A 118 Gas Minor Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines SF 2.90 0.00 2.76 0.50 3.50 Total = 10 2000/01 119 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 0.40 5.00 2.50 1.00 120 Non Process Diesel Minor Gas Compression CF 799.12 15.98 5.00 0.50 6.30 121 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 4.00 123.99 0.42 1.60 122 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 2.00 40.00 2.00 1.00 123 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 799.12 3.40 110.00 5.00 1.00

Page 78: HSR2001

*where C=Central, S=Southern, N=Northern areas, F=Fixed, MS=Semisub, MJ=Jackup 78 **N/A signifies holesize not applicable to mode of release

Table 7(a) : IGNITIONS - RELEASE PARAMETERS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type Severity System Type* of

Installation Gravity/ Density (kgs/m3)

Amount Released

(kgs) @Actual Pressure

(barg) Release Duration (mins)

Equivalent

Hole** (mm)

124 Non Process Diesel Minor Utilities, Oil, Diesel CF 849.07 0.42 0.07 1.30 1.00 125 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Gas Compression CF 886.02 44.30 80.99 5.00 1.60 126 Non Process Diesel Significant Utilities, Gas, Power Gen Turbines NF 799.12 79.91 0.55 1.00 17.20 127 Oil Minor Export, Oil NF 799.12 0.20 0.00 1.00 2.20 128 Gas Minor Utilities, Gas, Fuel Gas CF 19.90 0.70 17.00 6.00 1.00

129 Gas Significant Export, Gas SF 85.00 1.80 103.45 3.00 1.00 130 Gas Minor Gas Compression NF 0.80 0.03 0.00 0.25 4.10 131 Gas Minor Utilities, Gas, Fuel Gas CF 20.00 0.02 20.69 0.16 1.00

Total = 13

Page 79: HSR2001

79 *numbers signify order of ignition, i.e. 1=first, 2=second

Table 7(b) : IGNITIONS - MODE OF OPERATION & IGNITION SOURCES/SEQUENCES

Ignition Sequence* Year Ref. Hydrocarbon

Type Non Process

Type Severity Mode of Operation Ignition Source Delay Time(s) Flash Explosion Jet Pool

1992/93 1 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Testing Impinging on Hot Exhaust Manifold. 30 1 2 Oil Minor Construction Hot Work Sparks from welding operation ignited hydrocarbons. 1 3 Oil Significant Start-up The HP flare, which was lit at the time of oil carryover. 1 4 Gas Significant Shutting down Following shutdown to platform gas turbine driven

generator, caused by loss of fuel gas pressure, fire started inside turbines inlet air plenum.

1

Total = 4 1993/94 5 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Testing Hot surface on the turbine exhaust pipework. 1

6 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Normal Production Hot surface of power turbine exhaust cowling. 60 1 7 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Start-up On restart, after shutdown, natural temperature rise

flashed off pool of oil. 30 1

8 Non Process Methanol Significant Drilling Fluid ran down to a beam where a welder was working, welders sparks ignited release. 1

9 Non Process Methanol Minor Maintenance Hot Work Hot welding spelter falling from above. Hot work had been suspended, as was reinstated after drain down. At this point spillage occurred and was ignited.

1

10 Non Process Glycol Significant Normal Production Reboiler flame itself. The reboiler tube fails allowing glycol into contact with the heat source, ie the flame. 1 2

11 Non Process Glycol Significant Normal Production Glocol entered fire tube. 1 12 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Diesel in turbine exhaust space ignited by hot gases

of combustion. 1

13 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Ignited by burning gas / exhaust gases. 1 14 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Hot exhaust gases and hot surface caused ignition of

diesel fuel in duct. 1

15 Non Process Diesel Significant Maintenance Cold Work Hot surface of diesel engine exhaust diffuser. 4800 1 16 Non Process Heat Trans Oil Significant Testing Oil reached ignition temperature upon contact with a

hot, unlagged flange. 1

17 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Maintenance Cold Work Vaporised oil ignited from hot turbine exhaust. 180 1 18 Oil Significant Start-up Ignition source was flare system, which was lit at the

time of the carryover 1

19 Oil Minor Maintenance Cold Work Possibly static electricity from container and/or from operators clothing. 1

20 Condensate Minor Start-up Gas condensate spilled onto flare tip platform and ignited.

1

21 Condensate Minor Construction Hot Work Welder cutting into redundant pipework. 1 22 Gas Minor Maintenance Hot Work Welders spark from hot work site adjacent to (and

above) the leak. This produced a “gas ring” type of flame, - steady blue circular flame, two or three inches high.

1

23 Gas Minor Inspection Spark from a 24 volt lead going to earth. 1

Page 80: HSR2001

80 *numbers signify order of ignition, i.e. 1=first, 2=second

Table 7(b) : IGNITIONS - MODE OF OPERATION & IGNITION SOURCES/SEQUENCES

Ignition Sequence* Year Ref. Hydrocarbon

Type Non Process

Type Severity Mode of Operation Ignition Source Delay Time(s) Flash Explosion Jet Pool

24 Gas Significant Start-up Hot gases ignited in exhaust stack. 1 25 Gas Significant Shut Down Hot exhaust stack. 1 26 Gas Significant Construction Hot Work Local welding activity. 1 27 Gas Minor Normal Production Snow squall - lightning. 1 28 Gas Minor Normal Production Snow/sleet squall - lighntning. 1 29 Gas Minor Normal Production Sleet squall - lightning. 1 30 Gas Significant Normal Production Lightning strike. 1 Total = 26 1994/95 31 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Reinstatement Damaged seal ring blocked circulation of seal oil,

causing localised heating. 1

32 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Construction Hot Work Stray welding spark from work ongoing. 1 33 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Normal Production Hot surfaces of running machinery within turbine

enclosure. (Particularly exhaust system) 1

34 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Normal Production Hot exhaust duct. 1 35 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Start-up Lub oil mist ignited on hot surface. (Turbine output

shaft) 1

36 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Exhaust gases. 2 1 37 Non Process Glycol Minor Construction Hot Work Welding work in progress. 1 38 Non Process Glycol Minor Start-up Mechanical tube failure led to glycol ignition inside fire

tube. Ignited glycol burnt the flame arrestor which allowed burning glycol to exit the reboiler and drop to the deck with a resultant pool fire.

1

39 Non Process Glycol Minor Normal Production Flame was present in addition to normal burner flame in central fire tube of regenerator. 1

40 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production Hot surface. 1 41 Non Process Fuel Oil Significant Normal Production Burst line on no.1 engine spraying fuel onto no.4

engine exhaust manifold 1 2

42 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Excess diesel ignited in the transition duct (wet start on a hot engine) causing explosion and flame migration into engine compartment due to diesel drain in duct being partially blocked.

2 1

43 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Testing Turbocharger hot surface.

1

44 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Normal Production Hot surface of pump body had apparently ignited contaminants within the perfecto fluid.

60 1

45 Non Process Heli-Fuel Minor Maintenance Cold Work Heli-fuel made contact with engine exhausts. 1 46 Non Process Diesel Significant Normal Production Hot surface of gas turbine. 1 47 Non Process Diesel Significant Normal Production Hot surface of machine. 1

Page 81: HSR2001

81 *numbers signify order of ignition, i.e. 1=first, 2=second

Table 7(b) : IGNITIONS - MODE OF OPERATION & IGNITION SOURCES/SEQUENCES

Ignition Sequence* Year Ref. Hydrocarbon

Type Non Process

Type Severity Mode of Operation Ignition Source Delay Time(s) Flash Explosion Jet Pool

48 Oil Significant Drilling Fuel pipe fractured on no.1 diesel, spraying fuel onto no.4 engine. No.4 engine exhaust manifold caused fuel to ignite.

1

49 Condensate Minor Construction Cold Work Flare tip ignited condensate/vapour causing internal explosions within the flare system. A series of explosions resulted. (Approx. 12 in number)

1

50 Condensate Minor Sampling Condensate ignited due to electrostatic source. (Unsatisfactory earthing bond) 1

51 Gas Significant Normal Production A series of explosions caused by ignition of low volume, low pressure, gas combined with air and inert gases from adjacent system. Flare itself was source of ignition.

1 2

52 Gas Minor Start-up Internal combustion of extraneous material/gas in exhaust ducting. 1

53 Gas Minor Construction Hot Work Sparks from welding of pipe supports above. 1 54 Gas Minor Maintenance Hot Work Wind blown sparks from ‘burning’ hot work approx.

10ft from ignition. 1

Total = 24 1995/96 55 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Normal Production The heat from exhaust was sufficient to cause a

small flash fire when the lagging was disturbed during damping down /removal.

1

56 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Normal Production Hot surface of exhaust ducting or power turbine. 30 1 2 57 Non Process Glycol Minor Normal Production Not known - surface temp of still column, 180 oC. 715 1 58 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Hot surface of machine. 1 59 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Hot surface of machine. 1 60 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Reinstatement Turbine exhaust collector. 1 61 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Testing Suspect heat from engine turbocharger. 1 62 Gas Significant Construction Hot Work Flame from burning torch. (Oxyacetylene) 1 63 Gas Minor Construction Hot Work Sparks from welding operations. 1 Total = 9

1996/97 64 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Reinstatement Heat generated between the rotating stationery mechanical seal faces was the source of ignition.

1

65 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Shutting Down Hot metal surface of turbine casing. 300 1 66 Non Process Diesel Minor Testing Thought to be hot surface of burner inlet pipework. 1 67 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production Exhaust of number one main engine. 1 68 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production High temperature on top of caterpillar engine. 60 1

69 Non Process Diesel Minor Maintenance Cold Work Flash fire on hot turbine exhaust. 1

Page 82: HSR2001

82 *numbers signify order of ignition, i.e. 1=first, 2=second

Table 7(b) : IGNITIONS - MODE OF OPERATION & IGNITION SOURCES/SEQUENCES

Ignition Sequence* Year Ref. Hydrocarbon

Type Non Process

Type Severity Mode of Operation Ignition Source Delay Time(s) Flash Explosion Jet Pool

70 Non Process Diesel Significant Start-up Fire caused by ignition of some burners while diesel fuel from the unlit burner poured into transition cone and eventually ignited.

480 1

71 Non Process Diesel Significant Reinstatement Excess liquid fuel ignited by gas burners. 1620 1 72 Non Process Diesel Minor Start-up Residual heat. 45 1 73 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Normal Production Leaking engine exhaust and oil from leaking lube oil

lines along with high temperatures. 1200 1

74 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Reinstatement Lub oil/water wash fluid contact with hot exhaust. 60 1 75 Oil Significant Start-up This was a flaring incident, therefore no actual ignition

occurred. A flame was already present. 60 1

76 Condensate Minor Start-up Condensate heavy ends in fuel. Detected by heat detector causing shutdown. 1

77 Condensate Minor Construction Cold Work While removing a check valve from 12” flowline using a 110 volt grinder to remove the bolts. 1

78 Gas Minor Maintenance Hot Work Oxyacetylene burning torch. 1 79 Gas Minor Maintenance Hot Work Gas ignition caused by welding torch at wellhead. 1 80 Gas Significant Maintenance Hot Work Welding operations. 1 81 Gas Significant Start-up Unspent gas entered the exhaust resulting in

combustion and overpressure within the exhaust ducting.

1

Total = 18 1997/98 82 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Hot turbine surface. 1

83 Non Process Diesel Minor Maintenance Hot Work Sparks from welding on the process deck above dripping through to the marine deck. 1

84 Non Process Diesel Minor Start-up Hot turbine casing. 240 1 85 Gas Minor Drilling Cutting torch. 1 86 Gas Minor Maintenance Hot Work Welding Equipment. 1 87 Gas Minor Sampling Static, caused by poor electrical continuity of earth

strap. 1

88 Gas Significant Maintenance Hot Work Arc welding of flange to pipe stub. 1 2 89 Gas Significant Normal Production Spark from damaged trace heating cable. 9999 1 90 Gas Significant Start-up Excess gas ignited by burners. 30 1 Total = 9 1998/99 91 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Start -up Heat from heat exhaust ignited oil saturated lagging. 3600 1

92 Non Process Glycol Minor Normal Production Glycol entered the boiler flame tube and ignited. 1

93 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Maintenance Cold Work Turbine exhaust (two UV flame detectors activated and CO2 manually discharged). Turbine had been

1

Page 83: HSR2001

83 *numbers signify order of ignition, i.e. 1=first, 2=second

Table 7(b) : IGNITIONS - MODE OF OPERATION & IGNITION SOURCES/SEQUENCES

Ignition Sequence* Year Ref. Hydrocarbon

Type Non Process

Type Severity Mode of Operation Ignition Source Delay Time(s) Flash Explosion Jet Pool

and CO2 manually discharged). Turbine had been shutdown for approx 15 minutes prior to alarm.

94 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Shut Down Turbine exhaust - single UV flame detection (alarm on central control room fire and gas panel). CO2 operated manually by production operator. It is believed that a small fire was caused by oil coming in contact with the hot exhaust.

15 1

95 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Normal Production Hot surface. 15 1 96 Non Process Hydraulic Oil Significant Normal Production Not Known. 60 1 97 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Shutting Down Lub oil ignited by the hot surface of the power turbine

casing. 1

98 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Hot surface of burner inlet pipework. 1 99 Non Process Diesel Minor Start-up Hot surface of turbine fuel pipework at gas generator,

within turbine enclosure. 1

100 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production Hot surface of burner. Quantity so small no automatic detection picked up. Area operator noticed small amount of smoke from turbine vent.

1

101 Oil Minor Cleaning Filter basket had been removed from pipeline hydrocarbon present. The basket was removed, and a blue flash was apparent when it was flushed w ith water. It is thought that the hose was not anti-static and was source of ignition.

1

102 Condensate Minor Maintenance Hot Work There was no hydrocarbon release. Affected system was completely isolated from hydrocarbon sources and had been isolated, purged, flushed, a small residue was contained in a section of pipe being cut up for removal. Ignited by sparks/heat from a grinder.

1

103 Gas Minor Maintenance Cold Work Presumed to be static. Not proven. Other ignition sources considered. Residual current in the pump motor and the cathodic protection.

1

104 Gas Significant Start-up Hot surfaces in turbine. 1 105 Gas Minor Construction Hot Work Air operated grinder. 1 106 Gas Significant Construction Cold Work Flames were seen at turbine exhaust - unburnt gas

reached exhaust due to delay in ignition sequence sof tware.

1

107 Gas Significant Normal Production Lightning 1 108 Gas Minor Normal Production Lightning during snow squalls. 1 Total = 18 1999/00 109 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Exhaust temperature. (ie hot exhaust) 480 1

110 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production Suspect hot turbine casing surface. No flame was seen during this incident. On the basis that 2xIR

1

Page 84: HSR2001

84 *numbers signify order of ignition, i.e. 1=first, 2=second

Table 7(b) : IGNITIONS - MODE OF OPERATION & IGNITION SOURCES/SEQUENCES

Ignition Sequence* Year Ref. Hydrocarbon

Type Non Process

Type Severity Mode of Operation Ignition Source Delay Time(s) Flash Explosion Jet Pool

seen during this incident. On the basis that 2xIR Detectors had activated it is believed that a flash fire had occurred, investigations are ongoing.

111 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement Smoke caused by diesel supply fitting to one of the combustion cans leaking onto hot surfaces. 1

112 Non Process Diesel Minor Reinstatement On removal of the heat shield an area of black carbon could be seen around the lower half of the turbine casing this indicated that ignition did occur. Suspect hot turbine casing surface as ignition source.

120 1

113 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Shut Down Hot surfaces within the enclosure. 1 114 Condensate Significant Normal Production Platform flare tip. 1 115 Gas Minor Construction Hot Work Welders arc. 1 116 Gas Minor Maintenance Hot Work Burning torch from adjacent red hot work. 1 117 Gas Minor Maintenance Hot Work Welding operation. (Being undertaken) 1 118 Gas Minor Normal Production Very small ignition on backfire, resulting in flame

path. 1

Total = 10 2000/01 119 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Routine Maintenance Hot exhaust 1

120 Non Process Diesel Minor Maintenance Replacement

Hot exhaust trunking 1

121 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production Conducted heat on combustion chamber 1 122 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production Hot surface of the turbine casing 1 123 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production Diesel onto hot surface 1 124 Non Process Diesel Minor Normal Production Hot surface 1 125 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Normal Production Assumed to be wet surfaces within enclosure 1 126 Non Process Diesel Significant Start Up Diesel fuel seeped into combustion system and

ignited producing excessive smoke 1

127 Oil Minor Construction Hotwork Source of ignition w as spark from grinding of pipe with disc grinder

1

128 Gas Minor Normal Production Hot tubing casing 1 129 Gas Significant Construction Hotwork Assumed to be as a result of welding work ongoing

near the flange in a specially constructed habitat. No witness statements can confirm or deny this

60 1

130 Gas Minor Maintenance Hotwork Ignition occurred when shell was being pre-heated by means of naked flame, oxy-acetylene was the flame

1

131 Gas Minor Normal Production Hot surface 1 Total = 13

Page 85: HSR2001

85

Table 7(c) : IGNITIONS - DETECTION MODES & EMERGENCY ACTIONS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type

Severity Mode of Dete ction Emergency Actions Taken

1992/93 1 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon 2 Oil Minor Visual Other Action 3 Oil Significant Visual Manual Shutdown 4 Gas Significant Heat Auto Shutdown, Auto CO2/Halon Total = 4 1993/94 5 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Visual Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action

6 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action 7 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Flame Manual Shutdown, Manual Blowdown, Other Action 8 Non Process Methanol Significant Visual None 9 Non Process Methanol Minor Visual Other Action 10 Non Process Glycol Significant Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto Blowdown, Manual Deluge, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other

Action 11 Non Process Glycol Significant Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action 12 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual None 13 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual Auto Shutdown, Auto CO2/Halon 14 Non Process Diesel Minor Smoke, Flame Manual CO2/Halon 15 Non Process Diesel Significant Visual Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations 16 Non Process Heat Transfer

Oil Significant Visual Other Action

17 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action 18 Oil Significant Visual Auto Shutdown 19 Oil Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto Blowdown, Auto Deluge, Muster at Lif eboats, Other Action 20 Condensate Minor Visual None 21 Condensate Minor Visual Other Action 22 Gas Minor Visual Muster at Lifeboats, Other Action 23 Gas Minor Gas Other Action 24 Gas Significant Temperature

Change Auto Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action

25 Gas Significant Visual Auto Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Other Action 26 Gas Significant Visual Other Action 27 Gas Minor Visual Manual CO2/Halon 28 Gas Minor Visual Manual CO2/Halon 29 Gas Minor Visual Manual CO2/Halon 30 Gas Significant Visual Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon

Page 86: HSR2001

86

Table 7(c) : IGNITIONS - DETECTION MODES & EMERGENCY ACTIONS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type

Severity Mode of Dete ction Emergency Actions Taken

Total = 26 1994/95 31 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action

32 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Muster at Stations, Other Action 33 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Heat Auto Shutdown, Auto Blowdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other Action 34 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Other Action 35 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action 36 Non Process Diesel Minor Sound Manual Shutdown, Other Action 37 Non Process Glycol Minor Visual Other Action 38 Non Process Glycol Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Manual Blowdown, Manual Deluge, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other

Action 39 Non Process Glycol Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action 40 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual Muster at Stations, Other Action 41 Non Process Fuel Oil Significant Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action 42 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Auto CO2/Halon 43 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Flame Manual Shutdown, Auto Deluge, Other Action 44 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Other Action 45 Non Process Heli-Fuel Minor Visual Other Action 46 Non Process Diesel Significant Flame Manual Shutdown 47 Non Process Diesel Significant Flame Manual Shutdown 48 Oil Significant Smoke Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other Action 49 Condensate Minor Sound Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action 50 Condensate Minor Visual Auto Deluge 51 Gas Significant Sound Other Action 52 Gas Minor Sound Other Action 53 Gas Minor Visual Other Action 54 Gas Minor Visual Other Action Total = 24 1995/96 55 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action

56 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Heat Auto Shutdown, Manual Blowdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Other Action 57 Non Process Glycol Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations 58 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Manual Shutdown 59 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations 60 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Other Action

Page 87: HSR2001

87

Table 7(c) : IGNITIONS - DETECTION MODES & EMERGENCY ACTIONS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type

Severity Mode of Dete ction Emergency Actions Taken

61 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Heat Manual Shutdown, Auto Deluge, Muster at Stations, Other Action 62 Gas Significant Visual Other Action 63 Gas Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other Action Total = 9 1996/97 64 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto Deluge, Muster at Stations, Other Action

65 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Smoke, Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations 66 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations 67 Non Process Diesel Minor Smoke Manual Shutdown, Other Action 68 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action 69 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual Other Action 70 Non Process Diesel Significant Flame Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action 71 Non Process Diesel Significant Flame Manual CO2/Halon 72 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Manual Shutdown 73 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Smoke Manual Shutdown 74 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Auto Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations 75 Oil Significant Visual Manual Shutdown, Manual Blowdown, Muster at Stations 76 Condensate Minor Heat Auto Shutdown 77 Condensate Minor Visual Other Action 78 Gas Minor Visual Muster at Stations, Other Action 79 Gas Minor Other Action 80 Gas Significant Visual Other Action 81 Gas Significant Visual Other Action Total = 18 1997/98 82 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations

83 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual Other Action 84 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Auto CO2/Halon 85 Gas Minor Visual Other Action 86 Gas Minor Gas Other Action 87 Gas Minor Visual Other Action 88 Gas Significant Visual Other Action 89 Gas Significant Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto Blowdown, Auto Deluge, Muster at Stations 90 Gas Significant Sound None Total = 9

Page 88: HSR2001

88

Table 7(c) : IGNITIONS - DETECTION MODES & EMERGENCY ACTIONS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type

Severity Mode of Dete ction Emergency Actions Taken

1998/99 91 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Visual Muster at Stations, Other Action 92 Non Process Glycol Minor Visual, Flame Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations, Other Action 93 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Manual CO2/Halon 94 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon 95 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action 96 Non Process Hydraulic Oil Significant Flame Auto Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations 97 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Other Action 98 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon 99 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon 100 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual Manual Shutdown 101 Oil Minor Gas Other Action 102 Condensate Minor Other Action 103 Gas Minor Flame, Gas Auto Shutdown, Auto Blowdown, Auto Deluge, Muster at Stations 104 Gas Significant Sound Manual Shutdown, Other Action 105 Gas Minor Visual Other Action 106 Gas Significant Visual None 107 Gas Significant Flame Auto Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon 108 Gas Minor Heat Manual CO2/Halon Total = 18 1999/00 109 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Other Action

110 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Muster at Stations 111 Non Process Diesel Minor Heat, Gas Manual Shutdown 112 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual, Flame Auto Shutdown, Muster at Stations 113 Non Process Lub Oil Significant Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto CO2/Halon, Muster at Stations 114 Condensate Significant Visual Manual Shutdown 115 Gas Minor Visual Other Action 116 Gas Minor Visual Muster at Stations 117 Gas Minor Visual Other Action 118 Gas Minor Visual Manual Shutdown, Manual Blowdown, Other Action Total = 10 2000/01 119 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Visual Other Action, Muster at Lifeboats

120 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Auto CO2 / Halon, Other Action 121 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon, Other Action

Page 89: HSR2001

89

Table 7(c) : IGNITIONS - DETECTION MODES & EMERGENCY ACTIONS

Year Ref. Hydrocarbon Type

Non Process Type

Severity Mode of Dete ction Emergency Actions Taken

122 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Manual Shutdown 123 Non Process Diesel Minor Visual Manual Shutdown 124 Non Process Diesel Minor Flame Manual Shutdown, Manual CO2/Halon 125 Non Process Lub Oil Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto Blowdown, Auto CO2 / Halon, Muster at Stations 126 Non Process Diesel Significant Smoke Manual Shutdown, Muster at Stations 127 Oil Minor Flame, Visual Other Action 128 Gas Minor Gas Auto Shutdown, Auto Blowdown, Muster at Stations, Other Action 129 Gas Significant Flame, Visual Manual Shutdown, Other Action 130 Gas Minor Flame, Visual None 131 Gas Minor Flame Auto Shutdown, Auto CO2 / Halon

Total = 13

Page 90: HSR2001

90

Page 91: HSR2001

91

Table 8 : MEANS OF DETECTION : SUMMARY

DETECTION MODE TOTALS HYDRO- CARBON

TYPE

S E V

VE E R I

HEAT SMOKE FLAME GAS OTHER MODES LEAKS Maj 0 0 0 2 12 14 14 Sig 5 5 12 59 241 321 301 LIQUIDS Min 3 6 28 67 330 434 422 Maj 0 1 0 62 40 103 99 Sig 1 4 4 422 374 806 739 GAS Min 1 2 5 191 137 336 312 Maj 0 0 0 14 20 34 30 Sig 0 2 0 46 93 141 133 2-PHASE Min 0 0 1 2 20 23 21 Maj 0 1 0 78 72 151 143 Sig 6 11 16 527 708 1268 1173 TOTALS Min 4 8 34 260 487 793 755

GRAND TOTALS

10 20 50 865 1267 2212 2071

Notes: 1. Totals for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01 2. More than one type of detection may occur in relation to any one incident 3. Further breakdown of “OTHER” is shown in Table 9

Page 92: HSR2001

92

Table 9 : “OTHER” MEANS OF DETECTION

LIQUIDS GAS 2-PHASE Detection Mode Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min TOTAL

Visual 10 222 298 22 220 88 17 79 19 975 Sound 0 2 5 4 69 15 1 6 0 102

Change (pressure, level,

temperature) 2 8 3 6 4 1 0 2 0 26

Smell 0 8 24 5 70 28 0 2 1 138 Hand-held Detection 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 10

ROV 0 1 0 3 4 2 2 4 0 16 TOTALS 12 241 330 40 374 137 20 93 20 GRAND TOTALS

583 551 133 1267

Notes: 1. Data for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01 2. More than one type of detection may occur in relation to any one incident

Page 93: HSR2001

93

Table 10 : EMERGENCY ACTIONS versus RELEASE TYPE & SEVERITY

HYDROCARBON TYPE LIQUIDS GAS 2-PHASE TYPE OF ACTION

Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min TOTALS

AUTO 1 35 51 35 168 84 7 22 1 404 MANUAL 8 149 205 37 330 109 15 80 18 951 SHUTDOWN

NONE 5 117 166 27 241 119 8 31 2 716 AUTO 1 14 23 21 135 41 4 15 1 255

MANUAL 2 33 36 29 174 50 7 37 6 374 BLOWDOWN NONE 11 254 363 49 430 221 19 81 14 1442 AUTO 0 0 6 4 16 2 0 1 0 29

MANUAL 0 2 1 4 2 0 3 0 0 12 DELUGE NONE 14 299 415 91 721 310 27 132 21 2030 AUTO 0 5 9 0 7 1 0 1 0 23

MANUAL 0 7 12 1 4 5 0 0 0 29 CO2/HALON NONE 14 289 401 98 728 306 30 132 21 2019

AT STATIONS 2 49 57 38 217 106 15 36 0 520 AT LIFEBOATS 0 2 5 3 19 9 0 2 0 40 MUSTER

NONE 12 250 360 58 503 197 15 95 21 1511 YES 5 155 218 42 294 126 14 51 7 912 OTHER ACTION

TAKEN NO 9 146 204 57 445 186 16 82 14 1159 TOTALS 14 301 422 99 739 312 30 133 21 2071

Notes : 1. Data for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01 2. There may be more than one type of action taken in relation to any one incident

Page 94: HSR2001

94

Table 11 : CAUSATION & OPERATING MODE versus RELEASE TYPE & SEVERITY

HYDROCARBON TYPE & SEVERITY LIQUIDS GAS 2-PHASE

CAUSATION FACTORS

Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min Maj Sig Min

TOTALS

DESIGN FAULT 2 45 61 24 126 36 3 21 3 321 CORROSION/EROSION 0 47 80 5 61 38 9 34 3 277 MECHANICAL DEFECT 6 139 191 48 343 112 13 56 12 920

MATERIAL DEFECT 2 12 11 2 35 9 0 4 1 76 EQUIPMENT

FAULT OTHER EQUIPMENT 1 10 17 4 32 14 1 9 1 89

1362

INCORRECTLY FITTED 0 26 60 17 115 31 5 10 3 267 IMPROPER OPERATION 5 85 96 27 168 76 7 28 3 495

DROPPED OBJECT/OTHER IMPACT 1 7 9 2 6 6 3 2 0 36

LEFT OPEN/OPENED WITH HC 2 30 34 15 83 57 0 16 0 237

OPERATIONAL FAULT

OTHER OPERATIONAL 2 12 10 3 36 9 1 6 2 81

1116

NON-COMPLIANCE PROC / PTW 0 36 38 17 90 32 3 13 2 231 DEFICIENT PROCEDURE 3 51 53 17 123 49 1 25 1 323

PROCEDURAL FAULT

OTHER PROCEDURAL 1 4 4 2 16 5 1 1 0 34

588

OPERATING MODE IN AREA AT TIME OF INCIDENT

DRILLING/WELL OPERATION 5 25 18 7 70 44 5 21 2 197 NORMAL PRODUCTION 6 150 237 50 353 107 15 76 16 1010

SHUTDOWN/BLOWDOWN 1 25 16 10 58 15 3 7 0 135 PIGGING/ FLUSHING/CLEANING/INSPECTION 1 10 10 4 32 18 1 4 1 81

MAINTENANCE/CONSTRUCTION 0 30 43 11 65 44 1 6 1 201 TESTING/SAMPLING 0 14 21 2 14 13 2 6 1 73

REINSTATEMENT/START-UP 1 47 77 15 147 71 3 13 0 374

2071

TOTAL No. OF RELEASES 14 301 422 99 739 312 30 133 21 2071

Notes: 1. Data for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01 2. There may be several causation factors contributing to any one incident

Page 95: HSR2001

95

5.0 FIGURES

CONTENTS Figure 1. Pie-chart : Breakdown by hydrocarbon type, all incidents 2. Line graph : Monthly reporting frequency, Oct. 92 to Mar. 2001 3. Severity analysis : all releases 4. Line graph : Severity analysis, gas releases 5. Line graph : Severity analysis , liquid releases 6. Line graph : Severity analysis , 2 -phase releases 7. Bar graph : Highest 15 system failure rates 8. Bar graph : Highest 15 equipment failure rates

Page 96: HSR2001

96

Non Process11.5%

Oil16.8%

Condensate7.3%Gas

55.5%

2-Phase8.9%

184

151

347

239

1150

1. Total number of releases = 2071

2. Figures for the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-01

Figure 1 : BREAKDOWN BY HYDROCARBON TYPE

Page 97: HSR2001

97

Figure 2 : TRENDS IN REPORTING OCT 1992 TO MAR 2001

ON

DJ

FM

AM

JJ

AS

ON

DJ

FM

AM

JJ

AS

ON

DJ

FM

AM

JJ

AS

ON

DJ

FM

AM

JJ

AS

ON

DJ

FM

AM

JJ

AS

ON

DJ

FM

AM

JJ

AS

ON

DJ

FM

AM

JJ

AS

ON

DJ

FM

AM

JJ

AS

ON

DJ

FM

Month

0

10

20

30

40

50

No.

of R

elea

ses

Monthly Figures

1. Reported releases for the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-01 = 2071 2. Monthly average for 1992/93 = 14 (81 in total) October 1992 Database Start-up Monthly average for 1993/94 = 23 (271 in total) August 1993 Guidance Issued Monthly average for 1994/95 = 27 (325 in total) October 1994 First Outputs Report Issued Monthly average for 1995/96 = 18 (212 in total) October 1995 Second Outputs Report Issued Monthly average for 1996/97 = 19 (226 in total) April 1996 RIDDOR Offshore Monthly average for 1997/98 = 18 (218 in total) October 1996 Third Outputs Report Issued Monthly average for 1998/99 = 20 (234 in total) November 1996 Revised Guidance Issued Monthly average for 1999/00 = 20 (234 in total) December 1999 Fourth Outputs Report Issue Monthly average for 2000/01 = 23 (270 in total) December 2001 Fifth Outputs Report Issued

1992/93 1993/94 1995/96 1994/95 1999/00 1998/99 1996/97 1997/98 2000/01

Page 98: HSR2001

98

ALL SEVERITY 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01

MAJOR 12 24 20 20 19 13 15 12 8 SIGNIFICANT 50 150 194 134 129 139 134 126 117 MINOR 19 97 111 58 78 66 85 96 145 TOTAL 81 271 325 212 226 218 234 234 270

Severity Analysis

Figure 3 : All Offshore Hydrocarbon Releases

Start-up of Database on 01-10-1992 1. 1992/93 covers the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 only 2. Total number of releases reported to 31-03-01 = 2071

92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01

Year

0

50

100

150

200

250

No.

of

Rel

ease

s

MAJOR

SIGNIFICANT

MINOR

Page 99: HSR2001

99

GAS SEVERITY 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01

MAJOR 9 16 16 12 14 6 8 11 7 SIGNIFICANT 34 96 132 86 74 79 85 79 74 MINOR 10 41 51 24 20 29 31 46 60 TOTAL 53 153 199 122 108 114 124 136 141

Severity Analysis Figure 4 : Gas Releases

Start-up of Database on 01-10-1992 1. 1992/93 covers the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 only 2. Total number of gas releases reported to 31-03-01 = 1150

92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01

Year

0

50

100

150

No.

of

Rel

ease

s

MAJOR

SIGNIFICANT

MINOR

Page 100: HSR2001

100

LIQUIDS SEVERITY 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01

MAJOR 1 4 1 2 3 1 2 0 0 SIGNIFICANT 12 32 53 30 40 40 31 35 28 MINOR 9 53 56 34 54 37 53 47 79 TOTAL 22 89 110 66 97 78 86 82 107

Severity Analysis

Figure 5 : Liquid Releases (Oil, Condensate, etc.)

Start-up of Database on 01-10-1992 1. 1992/93 covers the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 only 2. Total number of liquid releases reported to 31-03-01 = 737

92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01

Year

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

No.

of

Rel

ease

s

MAJOR

SIGNIFICANT

MINOR

Page 101: HSR2001

101

2-PHASE SEVERITY 92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 MAJOR 2 4 3 6 2 6 5 1 1 SIGNIFICANT 4 22 9 18 15 20 18 12 15 MINOR 0 3 4 0 4 0 1 3 6 TOTAL 6 29 16 24 21 26 24 16 22

Severity Analysis

Figure 6 : 2-Phase Releases

Start-up of Database on 01-10-1992 1. 1992/93 covers the period 01-10-92 to 31-03-93 only 2. Total number of 2-Phase releases reported to 31-03-01 = 184

92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01

Year

0

5

10

15

20

25

No.

of

Rel

ease

s

MAJOR

SIGNIFICANT

MINOR

Page 102: HSR2001

102

Figure 7 : SYSTEM FAILURE RATES (leaks/system year)

1. Failure Rates shown for top 15 out of 52 system types. 2. Figures for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01.

3. Caution should be exercised when interpreting the failure rate for subsea gas injection well As this calculation is based on a very small equipment population.

Page 103: HSR2001

103

Figure 8 : EQUIPMENT FAILURE RATES (leaks/equipment year)

1. Failure Rates shown for top 15 out of 119 equipment types. 2. Figures for the period 1-10-92 to 31-03-01.

Page 104: HSR2001

104

Page 105: HSR2001

105

APPENDIX 1

OSD PROCESS INTEGRITY INITIATIVE

As indicated in the executive summary and elsewhere in this report, OSD has

undertaken an initiative to deal with Process Integrity concerns as a result of the

reporting plateau (see earlier comments) shown by recent offshore hydrocarbon

release statistics, and by trends identified from these statistics.

The initiative is aimed at increasing the awareness of the current unsatisfactory

situation, to identify root causes to bring greater emphasis on the necessity to reduce

offshore hydrocarbon releases, and to influence those people in the best position to

bring that about.

The Process Integrity initiative has three strands:

1) OSD has investigated all RIDDOR reportable hydrocarbon releases which

occurred during the planning year to 31 March 2001, which included offshore visits

by Inspectors for all major and some significant releases. The results of this work

are documented in offshore technology report OTO 2001/055 - OSD Hydrocarbon

Release Reduction Campaign - Report on the hydrocarbon release incident

investigation project 01/04/2000 to 31/03/2001.

2) Process integrity inspections of all manned production installations, will be

phased in over a three year period, i.e. 2000 to 2003.

3) Regular joint HSE/Industry Workshops on hydrocarbon releases will be held,

at least annually, and the first two of these were held on 9 November 2000 at Ardoe

House near Aberdeen, and on 7 November 2001 at Brittannia Hotel, Aberdeen.

Proceedings for these seminars are available from UKOOA.

Page 106: HSR2001

106

Page 107: HSR2001

107

APPENDIX 2

SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION

As indicated in the introduction to this report, there have been discussions with the

offshore industry on a classification system for hydrocarbon releases. The

consensus reached is that all reported releases can be classified as minor,

significant or major by applying agreed definitions and provisional classification

criteria.

DEFINITIONS : The definitions were agreed as follows :

MAJOR : "Potential to quickly impact outwith the local area, e.g. affect the

Temporary Refuge (TR), escape routes, escalate to other areas of the installation,

causing serious injury or fatalities."

A major leak, if ignited, would be likely to cause a "major accident", i.e. it would be of

a size capable of causing multiple casualties or rapid escalation affecting TR, escape

routes, etc.

SIGNIFICANT : "Potential to cause serious injury or fatality to personnel within

the local area and to escalate within that local area, e.g. by causing structural

damage, secondary leaks or damage to safety systems."

A significant leak, if ignited, might have the potential to cause an event severe

enough to be viewed as a "major accident" or be of a size leading to significant

escalation within the immediate area or module.

MINOR : "Potential to cause serious injury to personnel in the immediate vicinity,

but no potential to escalate or cause multiple fatalities."

A minor leak, even if ignited, would not be expected to result in a multiple fatality

event or significant escalation, but could cause serious injuries or a fatality local to

the leak site or within that module only.

Page 108: HSR2001

108

Any offshore hydrocarbon release reportable under RIDDOR 95 can be classified

under one of the above definitions, using criteria reported on the OIR/12 form. It was

also decided to group all releases of hydrocarbon liquid under one category of

"liquids", since oil, condensate, and non-process liquids (diesel, helifuel, glycol, etc.)

share the common characteristics of flammable fluids.

CRITERIA

The simplest criteria for classification is to use inventory released. This can be

further refined by taking into account hole size and duration, pressure, congestion

factors and a variety of other mitigation factors. At the time of preparation of this

report, the preferred criteria were based on quantity released, release rate and

duration. It should be noted, however, that discussions with industry on further

refinement of the criteria are still ongoing. (See ‘Implementation’ at the end of this

Appendix.)

MAJOR :

(i) Gas Releases :

EITHER [Quantity released > 300 kg]

OR [Mass release rate>1kg/s AND Duration >5 mins]

This could result in a jet fire of over 10 metres length (>1kg/s) capable of causing

significant escalation after 5 minutes duration, or a flash fire/explosion on reaching

LFL. Where 300 kg equates to approx. 3000 m3 explosive cloud at NTP, enough to

fill an entire module or deck area, and to cause serious escalation if ignited.

Page 109: HSR2001

109

(ii) Liquid Releases (Oil/Condensate/Non-process) :

EITHER [Quantity released > 9,000 kg]

OR [Mass release rate>10kg/s AND Duration >15 mins]

This could result in a pool fire over 10 metres in diameter (>10kg/s) filling a module

or cutting off a deck, hindering escape and affecting more than one person directly if

lasting for over 15 minutes duration.

(iii) 2-Phase Releases :

EITHER [Quantity of liquids released > 300 kg]

OR [Liquids mass release rate>1kg/s AND Duration >5 mins]

Combinations of the major gas and liquids scenarios described above are possible,

depending on the gas to oil ratio (GOR) involved.

MINOR :

(i) Gas Releases :

EITHER [Quantity released < 1 kg]

OR [Mass release rate <0.1 kg/s AND Duration < 2 mins]

This could result in a jet fire of less than 5 metres length (< 0.1 kg/s) which is

unstable (< 2 mins duration) and therefore unlikely to cause significant escalation , or

a flash fire/explosion on reaching LFL. Where <1 kg equates to <10 m3 explosive

cloud at NTP, probably insufficient to cause a significant hazard if ignited.

(ii) Liquid Releases (Oil/Condensate/Non-process) :

EITHER [Quantity released < 60 kgs]

OR [Mass release rate <0.2 kg/s AND Duration < 5 mins]

This could result in a pool fire smaller than 2 metres in diameter (< 0.2 kg/s) unlikely

to last long enough to hinder escape (< 5 mins), but could cause serious injury to

persons nearby.

Page 110: HSR2001

110

(iii) 2-Phase Releases :

EITHER [Quantity released < 1 kg]

OR [Liquids release rate <0.1 kg/s AND Duration < 2 mins]

Combinations of the gas and liquids scenarios described above are possible,

depending on GOR involved.

SIGNIFICANT : ( Those between major and minor.)

(i) Gas Releases :

Capable of jet fires of 5 to 10 metres lasting for between 2 -5 minutes, or release

rates between 0.1 to 1.0 kg/s lasting 2-5 minutes giving explosive clouds of between

10 and 3000 m3 in size.

(ii) Liquids Releases (Oil/Condensate/Non-process) :

Pool fires between 2 and 10 metres in diameter, lasting for between 5 and 15

minutes.

(iii) 2-Phase Releases :

Combinations of the gas and liquids scenarios described above are possible.

IMPLEMENTATION

All current and future releases will be classified according to the above agreed

criteria for the types of hydrocarbons involved, and the results used in HCR statistics

reports.

Any further refinement of the criteria will be retrospectively applied, and the

severities adjusted where necessary.

It is important to note, however, that those releases with a hole size labelled N/A are

special cases where the release rate is not applicable to the mode of release (e.g.

open topped vessels such as shale shakers, or where carry-over of hydrocarbons

from one system to another was involved). All such releases were classified by

inspection of the amount released only.

Page 111: HSR2001

111

HYDROCARBON RELEASE STATISTICS, 2001 QUESTIONNAIRE

To help improve the quality of offshore data dissemination, would you please answer the following questions on the hydrocarbon release statistics contained in this report: 1. What is your connection with the UK Offshore Oil and Gas Industry? (Tick one box)

Oil Company management c Oil Company employee c Academic c Service Company management c Service Company employee c Consultant c Industry Assoc. Representative c Trade Union c Journalist c Other (specify) _________________________________________

2. Does this report satisfy your requirements with regard to Offshore Hydrocarbon releases? Completely c More than 50% c Poorly c Not at all c 3. Please indicate areas in which you think a change would be beneficial: * delete as necessary * More / less discussion c * More / less tables c * More / less graphs c * More / less analysis c (see Q4) Any other details as required: ____________________________________________________________________ 4. It is planned to publish a separate analysis report on offshore hydrocarbon release. Would you like to receive such reports on an annual basis? Yes c No c 5. Would you be prepared to pay a nominal charge to cover production costs for future reports? Statistics Report Yes c No c Analysis Report Yes c No c 6. To what use do you put the hydrocarbon release statistics?

Safety Case Development c Project Development c Ind. Relations c Reliability/Availability c Risk Assessment c Design c Health & Safety Management c Other (specify) ___________________________________________

Please return completed form to: HSE, Hazardous Installations Directorate CD4C Data Management Room 201 Merton House Stanley Road Bootle L20 3DL

THANK YOU FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM