how to conduct a supply chain business impact analysis · 2010-07-09 · 1 april 12-14, 2010...
TRANSCRIPT
1
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
How to Conduct a Supply ChainBusiness Impact Analysis
Gary S. Lynch, CISSPManaging Director & Global LeaderSupply Chain Risk [email protected]
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Today
• What is our objective?
• What is the desired output?
• Where do we begin?
• What’s the system we need to achieve the desired output?
2
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
What is our objective?
• Create a system to balance business value against potential exposure
• Build a business case for risk investment
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Example
4.5 4.5
3.6
4.5
5.2
4.6
5.3 5.4
6
6.6
8.2
7.9
6.9
6.5
7.2
6.3
7
6
5.2
6.4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9Inherent Risk
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9Mgmt. Effectiveness
Mngt. Effect. 4.5 4.5 3.6 4.5 5.2 4.6 5.3 5.4 6 6.6
Inherent Risk 8.2 7.9 6.9 6.5 7.2 6.3 7 6 5.2 6.4
Pt A Pt B Pt C Pt D Pt E Pt F Pt G Pt H Pt I Pt J
Revenue Stream: The Ultimate WidgetRevenue Stream: The Ultimate Widget
3
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
What is our desired output?(macroview)
Revenue Stream: The Ultimate WidgetRevenue Stream: The Ultimate WidgetImpact
Effort
Sun/OracleEnvironment(MRP)
Testers, EM Assembly, Engineers, Sr. Bus Dev
FacilityHigh
High
Low
Low
Quad Pick & Place
Export licenses for first time shipments
Illustra
tive
Test equipment
Helium
Voice & Data Communications
Contracts
Employee files
ATI RouterInsta-pack
Crimping hand tools, cutters, irons
Cleared Personnel
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
What is our desired output?(microview)
Revenue Stream: The Ultimate WidgetRevenue Stream: The Ultimate Widget
4
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Where do we begin?
• Assumptions
• Scope
• System
• Something of value
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
The Reality of RiskDefinition
• Uncertainty
• Exposure to Uncertainty
5
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
There is an infinite universe of potential failures – all with the potential for
significant impact
Consumer
Wholesaler
DistributionCenter
Filling & Packaging
Supplier Failures (financial, production,
design, etc.)
Natural Disasters
Work StoppagesLabor Disputes
Infrastructure Outages (fire in plant, power
grid down, etc.)
Unanticipated Demand Surge
or Drop-offPolitical Upheava
l
Price, Currency, and Interest
Rate FluctuationsUnanticipated
Supply Constraints,
Allocation, or Price Increases
Spoilage
Counterfeiting
Improper Handlingor Cargo Placement
Delivery Delays
Theft
Diversion/ Gray Market
Poor Packaging
Manufacturing
Raw Materials
PandemicPandemic
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Exposure to Uncertainty
STEP 6 - MEASUREMENT OF RISK
25%
50%
Mitigated BI Risk
U.S. Plant
6
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Assumptions
• Business impact assessment versus functional impact assessment
• Collective versus individual perspective
• Goal is to determine impact regardless of exposure exists; within or outside the organization boundaries
ResourcesFunctions
Processes
Flows
Products&
Services
Clients&
Markets
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Scope
• Know no borders
• However, reality is we need to do it manageable “chunks”
7
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Supply chains are complex, geographically distributed & collectively managed
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Manageable “Chunks”Cropping
Scope
Lo
gistics
Corporate and Shared Services Support
Active Ing. & MaterialSuppliers
ActiveMaterial
SuppliersCustomers
Logistics
Sourcing Distribution (US based)
OperationsDistribution Centers &
WholesalersPrimary Care Doctors
Specialty Doctors
Hospitals
Pharmacnies
3Ps L
og
istics
Lo
gistics
R&D Clinical Development
Manufacturing
BulkProduction
Packing &Materials
Clinical Trials
8
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Need a system & process to manage supply chain risk
Value Alignment
Prioritization &
Allocation
GapRecognition
Options&
Alternatives
Pricing&
Measurement
ExecutionOf
Risk StrategyOptimization
RISCProgram
Diagnostic
• Value segmentation (by product, product line, SKUs, or other value creating segmentation)
• Flow analysis• Risk paradigm
set, listening posts & market sensing, client & market alignment
• Line of sight (business process & resource mapping) & scoping
• Impact failure analysis & modeling
• Relevance & threat analysis & modeling
• Current state evaluation
• Risk tolerance index (current state & benchmark)
• Risk effect analysis (current state & benchmark
• Risk option analysis & modeling (finance, alternate finance, mitigation, acceptance)
• Integration impact analysis & modeling (cost, service, social, quality)
• Solution pricing and modeling
• Business case creation with roadmap
• Decision modeling
• Risk transfer optimization analysis & modeling
• Risk mitigation optimization analysis & modeling
• Risk portfolio optimization analysis & modeling
Overall program assessment, validation, continuous improvement
• Governance & alignment
• Policy, standards & organization
• Architecture & processes
• Awareness, education & training
• Technology, tools & procedures
• NOTE: PLAN, DO, CHECK, ACT
Risk Identification(impact assessment)
Risk Measurement& Investment
Risk Execution(Mitigation, Financing,
Monitoring & Optimization)
Source: “Single Point of Failure”, Lynch, Wiley, 2009, pg 233
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Objective: match greatest value with highest impact
Value Consideration• Quantitative
Contribution• Revenue• Margin• Cash• Asset
• Qualitative Contribution
• Brand• Compliance• Strategic
• Weight at point in time
Illustrative Only - Random Org Selected - Does not reflect actual priority
Hallmark Rationalization – Business AlignmentContribution to overall value of the organization
ValueFilter
Based on the value assessment, Management establishes priorities basedupon which to allocate timemanagement attention, resources, and capital
Value Target
Greeting cards
9
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Map product/service flows &analyze failure points
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Incorporate resource categories into scope of analysis
PeoplePeople Technology and Processing
Technology and Processing
Physical Environment
Physical Environment RelationshipsRelationships
Leaders and ManagersLeaders and Managers
Critical TalentCritical Talent
Other EmployeesOther Employees
Contingent workforceContingent workforce
FunctionsFunctions
Electronic dataElectronic data
ElectronicapplicationsElectronic
applications
Nonphysical infrastructure:Nonphysical
infrastructure:
EquipmentEquipment
FacilityFacility
Raw materialsRaw materials
InventoryInventory
Work in progressWork in progress
Vital recordsVital records
Peripherals and supplies
Peripherals and supplies
Other tangible assetsOther tangible assets
Cash and currencyCash and currency
CustomersCustomers
General publicGeneral public
External suppliersExternal suppliers
Internal suppliersInternal suppliers
InvestorsInvestors
InsurersInsurers
Public and external infrastructure
Public and external infrastructure
RegulatorsRegulators
Industry consortiumsIndustry consortiums
Auditors Auditors
Service ProvidersService Providers
10
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Analyze impacts and prioritize both internal and external suppliers
Logistics Portion of Supply Chain (Illustrative)
PRIORITIZED FAILURE POINTS
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Quantify and Qualify Impacts
• Quantitative Impact - ~$3,305,000**• Qualitative Impact – Strategic – Shipfitter shop journeyman have over 15 years experience in the second busiest fabrication department
Journeyman – Shipfitter Shop
• Quantitative Impact - ~$4,870,000**• Qualitative Impact – Strategic – Mechanical journeyman generally have approximately 20 years of experience and are not readily available for hire
Journeyman – Mechanical
• Consider expanding recruiting base to similarly skilled professions outside of marine
• Accelerate knowledge transfer through new methods of knowledge management (e.g., IT-based education, external mentoring programs)
• Establish contract or partnership with sub-contractor or competitor to provide replacement help immediately following an incident.
• Analyze the feasibility of establishing further agreements with Norfolk for skilled labor.
• Quantitative Impact - ~$5,044,000**• Qualitative Impact – Strategic – Loftsman hold critical skill sets that are very difficult to replace in a marketplace with an aging workforce
Loftsman
Recommendations*Annual ImpactCritical Skill Sets*
People (Skills)
ProductionSupport
ProductionSupportFabrication
FabricationMaterial Management
Material ManagementExecution
Planning
Execution PlanningProgram
Management
Program Management
Business Development & Contracts
Business Development & Contracts
Technology
Physical
Relationships
People (Skills)
ProductionSupport
ProductionSupportFabrication
FabricationMaterial Management
Material ManagementExecution
Planning
Execution PlanningProgram
Management
Program Management
Business Development & Contracts
Business Development & Contracts
Technology
Physical
Relationships
Example
11
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Couple of footnotes
• Not perfection on the numbers, rather a stratification
• Trajectory counts
• Behavioral issues trump all else, will have to factor in (slide)
• Impact based (versus threat)
• Don’t lose focus on overall goal
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans
Wrap Up
• Objective
• Output
• Starting point
• System
• Law of the Laws– Behavioral
12
April 12-14, 2010Sheraton New Orleans