how tata motors turnaround

2
September-October 2004 '\ Alignment at Tata Motors' Commercial Vehicle Business Unit By Lauren Keller Johnson, Contributing Writer How did India's largest commercial vehicle maker turn a $108.62 million loss into a $107 million profit in just two years -as well as win entry into the B alanced Scorecard Hall of Fame? By aligning every manager and employee securely behind a radical new corporate strategy. '" Tata Motors' C ommercial Vehicle Business Unit (CVBU) is India's largest manufacturer of trucks, tractor-trailers, buses, off-road vehicles, and defense vehicles. One of the 10 most successful commercial vehicle manufacturers worldwide, CVBU sells to more than 70 nations. In fiscal year 2002-2003, the division accounted for a whopping 600/0 f Tata Motors' inventory turnover. But in 2000, things didn't look so rosy. That year, CVBU logged the first loss in its 50-plus years - to the tune of $108.62 million. Ravi Kant, CVBU's executive director (the equivalent of CEO), laid out an aggressive new plan to reverse the slide. The plan called for serious cost cutting across unit operations and more effective strategic planning and execution. The division decided to adopt the Balanced Scorecard as a key tool in these efforts. As K.C. Girotra, general manager of CVBU's Lucknow plant and an early leader of the scorecard initiative, explains, "The BSC built naturally on our company's use of SQDCM [safety, quality, delivery, cost, and morale], a methodology that [Daimler] Chrysler uses and that we adopted in 1997. With its emphasis on cause-and-effect linkages among the various per- spectives, the scorecard promised to help us achieve even better results than what we had obtained so far with SQDCM." To attain those results, the divi- sion's executives knew they had .; level scorecard through strategic mittee and scorecard team didn't mandate objectives to SBU lead- ers. Rather, they challenged each reporting organization to define strategies that would best enable it to support CVBU's targets. This technique yielded several important benefits. It encouraged second-tier managers to clearly visualize the larger organization's desired future direction and align their own strategies and supporting initiatives behind it. It also fostered a sense of ownership and account- ability among these leaders. Lower- level managers understood that they had latitude in determining how to achieve results, rather than receiving mandates from top executives. And it result ed in cascaded scorecards that supported CVBU's high-level strategy in unique ways. To illustrate, consider CVBU's internal process objective "Enhance product and service quality levels." (See Figure 1, next page.) This corporate-level objective shows up in the company's ]amshedpur manufacturing plant's strategy map in two process objectives: "Quality and consistency" and "Ensure new products adhere to cost, time, and quality targets." In the Sales and Marketing map, the supporting objective is "Install sales process to all dealerships." In addition, CVBU executives realized that although cascaded maps should be based on higher- level maps and contain the same perspectives, "local tailoring" was essential. While the Sales and Marketing map contains the same four perspectives as the CVBU map, it is geared t oward supporting the growth aspect of CVBU's strategy rather than the cost-containment aspect. Such customizing helps to ensure that the business units make the best use of their strengths to support high-level strategic objectives. to achieve enterprisewide align- ment. To that end, they assembled a high-level steering committee comprising cross-functional heads and other key officers, such as the regional sales managers, who reported to Kant. This committee then appointed a core scorecard team of five individuals to work with the steering committee to build and deploy the corporate strategy map and scorecard. Both teams committed to monthly meetings, where they reviewed progress, prioritized objectives for strategic business units, and allocated resources to the most vital objectives and initiatives. As another step in securing hori- zontal alignment, senior leaders also defined new cross-functional responsibilities for themselves. For instance, while one plant manager was given ownership of the objective of driving cost reduction across CVBU, another became accountable for imple- menting quality improvement strategies acr oss t he organization. The division's approach to cascading the scorecard to secure vertical alignment has proved just as thorough as its horizontal- alignment efforts. Once the corporate BSC was finalized, the scorecard team shared it with the heads of CVBU's strategic business units, helping them develop their own strategy maps and scorecards, and populate them with appropriate objectives and initiatives. Each cascaded scorecard is linked to the high-

Upload: maneeshabhatnagar

Post on 07-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

8/6/2019 How Tata Motors Turnaround

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-tata-motors-turnaround 1/2

September-October 2004

Alignment at Tata Motors'

Commercial Vehicle

Business UnitBy Lauren Keller Johnson, Contributing Writer

How did India's largest commercial vehicle maker turn a$108.62 million loss into a $107 million profit in just twoyears -as well as win entry into the Balanced Scorecard Hallof Fame? By aligning every manager and employee securelybehind a radical new corporate strategy.

'"Tata Motors' Commercial VehicleBusiness Unit (CVBU) is India'slargest manufacturer of trucks,tractor-trailers, buses, off-roadvehicles, and defense vehicles.One of the 10 most successfulcommercial vehicle manufacturers

worldwide, CVBU sells to morethan 70 nations. In fiscal year2002-2003, the division accountedfor a whopping 600/0 f TataMotors' inventory turnover.

But in 2000, things didn't look so

rosy. That year, CVBU logged thefirst loss in its 50-plus years -

to the tune of $108.62 million.Ravi Kant, CVBU's executivedirector (the equivalent of CEO),laid out an aggressive new plan

to reverse the slide. The plancalled for serious cost cuttingacross unit operations and moreeffective strategic planning and

execution. The division decidedto adopt the Balanced Scorecardas a key tool in these efforts. As

K.C. Girotra, general managerof CVBU's Lucknow plant and

an early leader of the scorecardinitiative, explains, "The BSC builtnaturally on our company's use of

SQDCM [safety, quality, delivery,cost, and morale], a methodologythat [Daimler] Chrysler uses andthat we adopted in 1997. With its

emphasis on cause-and-effectlinkages among the various per-

spectives, the scorecard promisedto help us achieve even betterresults than what we hadobtained so far with SQDCM."

To attain those results, the divi-sion's executives knew they had

level scorecard through strategicobjec;tives. But the steering com-mittee and scorecard team didn'tmandate objectives to SBU lead-ers. Rather, they challenged each

reporting organization to definestrategies that would best enableit to support CVBU's targets.

This technique yielded severalimportant benefits. It encouragedsecond-tier managers to clearlyvisualize the larger organization'sdesired future direction and align

their own strategiesand supportinginitiatives behind it. It also fostereda sense of ownership and account-ability among these leaders. Lower-level managers understood thatthey had latitude in determininghow to achieve results, rather

than receiving mandates fromtop executives. And it resulted incascaded scorecards that supportedCVBU's high-level strategy in

unique ways.

To illustrate, consider CVBU's

internal process objective"Enhance product and servicequality levels." (See Figure 1, next

page.) This corporate-level objectiveshows up in the company's

]amshedpur manufacturing plant's

strategy map in two processobjectives: "Quality and consistency"and "Ensure new products adhere

to cost, time, and quality targets."

In the Sales and Marketing map,the supporting objective is "Install

sales process to all dealerships."

In addition, CVBU executivesrealized that although cascadedmaps should be based on higher-level maps and contain the same

perspectives, "local tailoring"

was essential. While the Salesand Marketing map contains thesame four perspectives as theCVBU map, it is geared towardsupporting the growth aspect ofCVBU's strategy rather than thecost-containment aspect. Suchcustomizing helps to ensure thatthe business units make the bestuse of their strengths to support

high-level strategic objectives.

to achieve enterprisewide align-ment. To that end, they assembleda high-level steering committeecomprising cross-functional headsand other key officers, such asthe regional sales managers, who

reported to Kant. This committee

then appointed a core scorecardteam of five individuals to workwith the steering committee tobuild and deploy the corporatestrategy map and scorecard. Both

teams committed to monthlymeetings, where they reviewed

progress, prioritized objectivesfor strategic business units, andallocated resources to the mostvital objectives and initiatives.

As another step in securing hori-

zontal alignment, senior leadersalso defined new cross-functionalresponsibilities for themselves.For instance, while one plantmanager was given ownershipof the objective of driving costreduction across CVBU, anotherbecame accountable for imple-

menting quality improvementstrategies across the organization.

The division's approach tocascading the scorecard to secure

vertical alignment has provedjust as thorough as its horizontal-alignment efforts. Once the

corporate BSC was finalized,the scorecard team shared it with

the heads of CVBU's strategicbusiness units, helping them

develop their own strategy mapsand scorecards, and populatethem with appropriate objectivesand initiatives. Each cascadedscorecard is linked to the high-

8/6/2019 How Tata Motors Turnaround

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/how-tata-motors-turnaround 2/2

Balanced Scorecard Report

Figure 1. Linking CascadedScorecardso the Corporate Strategy

16' '" tii, I (i';;O.,",...~'"'1~-",...",.~....

Manufacturingbalancedscorecard

industry at times. For example,when National Thermal Power, amajor utilities company in India,heard about CVBU's scorecardexperience and expressed curiosityabout it, the division invited NTPrepresentatives to come learnmore. CVBU's scorecard teammembers have also visited other

companies to explain the benefitsof using the BSC. According toGirotra, "We've made a commitmentto sharing our scorecardexperience,even with a competitor."

Though CVBU has just a fewyears of scorecard work underits belt, its efforts seem to begenerating positive resultsalready. For example, in just twoyears, its $108.62 million lossturned into a $107 million profit-due in large part to executionof the cost-cutting component ofthe division's new strategy. And

revenues have grown 40% in thelast two years -at least doublewhat CVBU's nearest competitorhas achieved. 8

Reprint #BO409E

CVBU uses several approachesto secure vertical alignment downto the employee level. At annual"town hall" meetings at eachplant, Kant communicates thedivision's mission, vision, values,and strategy. He then invites

employees to ask questions. "Atthese meetings," Girotra says, "we

might see workmen standing upand asking things like, 'Why arewe making more fully built vehi-cles now and fewer chassis thatcan be custom-built into buses orother vehicle types?'" Answers tosuch questions (in this case,because the customized-chassisapproach had caused serious.delays for companies that selectedthis option) deepen employees'understanding of the corporatestrategy and their role in executing

it. CVBU also uses surveys toassessemployees' strategic under-standing and has defined major

performing areas (MPAs) foreach manager and employee thattie directly to the person's depart-ment scorecard. For example, asales and marketing manager'sMPAs might include conductingproduct demonstrations n northernIndia for particular product models,increasing market share for the

pickup truck segment in India,and creating model dealershipsin a specific region of India. .

\,..,

Compensation is tied to perform-ance on MPAs.

In cascading and integrating itsBSC initiative, CVBU demonstratedthe power of both vertical and

horizontal alignment for organiza-tions seeking to execute corporatestrategy. In Girotra's words, "Weare a large organization. With

26,000 employees, more than 100independently owned dealerships,three large manufacturing plants,and 200 different products, wehad to ensure strong alignmentboth up and down as well asacross the division."

The division has recently extendedits alignment efforts by sharingits scorecard experiences andresults with partners outside CVBU'sboundaries -such as its inde-

pendent dealers, vendors, vehicleservice stations, and joint-venturecollaborators. As Girotra explains,"We want them to know thebenefits we've gained from thescorecard, including increasedcustomer focus, improvedprocesses, and understanding ofcause-and-effect relationships.Our hope is that these partnerswill also start using the scorecard,which would enable the whole

system to improve.".This expanding of alignment

reaches even beyond CVBU's

To subscribe o Balanced Scorecard Report, call 800.668.6705.Outside the U.S.,call 617.783.7474.bsr.harvardbusinessonline.org