how tanakh evolved

19
HOW TANAKH EVOLVED โ€ข AUTHORSHIP โ€ข CANONIZATION โ€ข MASORETIC TEXT โ€ข INTERPRETATION (TRANSLATIONS & COMMENTARIES)

Upload: others

Post on 27-May-2022

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

โ€ข AUTHORSHIP

โ€ข CANONIZATION

โ€ข MASORETIC TEXT

โ€ข INTERPRETATION (TRANSLATIONS & COMMENTARIES)

Page 2: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

TORAH

GenesisExodus LeviticusNumbersDeuteronomy

PROPHETS(early)JoshuaJudgesSamuel (1-2)Kings (1-2)

(later)IsaiahJeremiahEzekielMinor Prophets

WRITINGS(major)PsalmsProverbsJob

(minor)Song of SongsRuthLamentationsEcclesiastesEsther

DanielEzra (Nehemiah)Chronicles (1-2)

Page 3: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

ื‘ ื“ื•ืžืข ื“ื™ ืฃื“ ืืจืชื‘ ืื‘ื‘ ืชื›ืกืž ื™ืœื‘ื‘ ื“ื•ืžืœืชBT BABA BATRA 14B

โ€ข Our Rabbis taught: The order of the Prophets is, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Isaiah, and the Twelve Minor Prophetsโ€ฆ

The order of the Hagiographa is Ruth, the Book of Psalms, Job, Prophets, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Lamentations, Daniel and the Scroll of Esther, Ezra and Chroniclesโ€ฆ

ืขืฉื•ื”ื™ :ืื™ืื™ื‘ื  ืœืฉืŸืจื“ืก ,ืจ"ืชโ€ข ื”ื™ืžืจื™ ,ืื™ื›ืœืžื• ืœืื•ืžืฉ ,ืื™ื˜ืคื•ืฉื•โ€ฆืจืฉืข ืื™ื ืฉื• ื”ื™ืขืฉื™ ,ืœืืงื–ื—ื™ื•

,ืื™ืœื”ืช ืจืคืกื• ืชื•ืจ :ืื™ื‘ื•ืชื› ืœืฉ ืŸืจื“ื™ืกโ€ข ืื™ืจื™ืฉื” ืจื™ืฉ ,ืชืœื”ืง ,ื™ืœืฉืžื• ื‘ื•ื™ืื• ืืจื–ืข ,ืจืชืกื ืชืœื™ื’ืžื• ืœืื™ื ื“ ,ืชื•ื ื™ืงื• ...ืื™ืžื™ื” ื™ืจื‘ื“ื•

Page 4: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

โ€ข Let us examine this. Hosea came first, as it is written, โ€œGod spoke first to Hosea.โ€ But did God speak first to Hosea? Were there not many prophets between Moses and Hosea? R. Johanan, however, has explained that [what It means is that] he was the first of the four prophets who prophesied at that period, namely, Hosea, Isaiah, Amos and Micah.

โ€ข Should not then Hosea come first? โ€” Since his prophecy is written along with those of Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi, and Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi came at the end of the prophets, he is reckoned with them. But why should he not be written separately and placed first? โ€”Since his book is so small, it might be lost [if copied separately].

โ€ข Let us see again. Isaiah was prior to Jeremiah and Ezekiel. Then why should not Isaiah be placed first? โ€” Because the Book of Kings ends with a record of destruction and Jeremiah speaks throughout of destruction and Ezekiel commences with destruction and ends with consolation and Isaiah is full of consolation; therefore we put destruction next to destruction and consolation next to consolation.

".ืขืฉื•ื”ื‘ 'ื” ืจื‘ื“ ืชืœื—ืช" :ื‘ื™ืชื›ื“ ,ืื™ื“ืง ืขืฉื•ื” ื™ื“ื›ืžโ€ข ืขืฉื•ื” ื“ืขื• ื”ืฉืžืž ืืœื”ื• ?ื”ืœื—ืช ืจื‘ื“ ืขืฉื•ื” ืืข ื™ื›ื• ื”ืขื‘ืจืืœ ื”ืœื—ืช ื”ื™ื”ืฉ :ืŸื ื—ื•ื™ ืจ"ืื• !ื•ื™ื” ืื™ืื™ื‘ื  ื”ืžื› ืขืฉื•ื” :ืŸื” ื•ืœืื• ,ืงืจืคื” ื•ืชื•ืื‘ ื•ืื‘ื ืชื ืฉ ืื™ืื™ื‘ื  .ื”ื›ื™ืžื• ืกื•ืžืข ,ื”ื™ืขืฉื™ื•

ื™ื‘ื’ ื”ื™ืชืื•ื‘ื  ื‘ื™ืชื›ื“ ืŸื•ื™ื› !ืืฉื™ืจื‘ ืขืฉื•ื”ืœื”ื™ืžื“ืงื™ืœื•โ€ข ืื™ืื™ื‘ื  ืฃื•ืก ื™ื›ืืœืžื• ื”ื™ืจื›ื– ื™ื’ื—ื• ,ื™ื›ืืœืžื• ื”ื™ืจื›ื– ื™ื’ื— ื”ื™ื“ื•ื—ืœ ื”ื™ื‘ืชื›ื™ืœื• .ื•ื”ื™ื™ื“ื”ื‘ ื”ื™ืœ ื‘ื™ืฉื— ,ื•ื•ื” .ืกื›ืจื™ืž ืจื˜ื•ื–ื“ ื™ื“ื™ื™ื !ื”ื™ืžื“ืงื™ืœื•

ื”ื™ืžื“ืงื™ืœ ,ืœืืงื–ื—ื™ื• ื”ื™ืžืจื™ืžืื™ื“ืง ื”ื™ืขืฉื™ ื™ื“ื›ืžโ€ข ื”ื™ืžืจื™ื• ืื ื‘ืจื•ื— ื”ื™ืคื•ืก ืื™ื›ืœืžื“ ืŸื•ื™ื› !ืืฉื™ืจื‘ ื”ื™ืขืฉื™ืœ ื”ื™ืคื™ืกื• ืื ื‘ืจื•ื— ื”ื™ืฉื™ืจ ืœืืงื–ื—ื™ื• ,ืื ื‘ืจื•ื— ื”ื™ืœื•ื› ืื ื‘ืจื•ื— ืŸื ื™ื›ืžืก ,ืืชืžื—ื  ื”ื™ืœื•ื› ื”ื™ืขืฉื™ื• ,ืืชืžื—ื .ืืชืžื—ื ืœ ืืชืžื—ื ื• ืื ื‘ืจื•ื—ืœ

Page 5: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

โ€ข Some of the books are categorized as โ€œNeviโ€™imโ€(โ€œProphetsโ€).

โ€ข Some of the books are categorized as โ€œKetuvimโ€(โ€œWritingsโ€).

โ€ข Each set of books is presumed to belong in aparticular order.

โ€ข This order is primarily chronological, insequential order of the authors and editors towhom the works are attributed.

โ€ข Sometimes the order is dictated by theme ratherthan chronology.

Page 6: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

HISTORICAL SOURCES FOR CANONIZATION

Page 7: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

BEN SIRAH (2nd century BCE) Chapter 44Praise of Israelโ€™s Great Ancestors1 I will now praise the godly,

our ancestors, in their own time,2 The abounding glory of the Most Highโ€™s portion,

his own part, since the days of old.3 Subduers of the land in kingly fashion,

renowned for their might,Counselors in their prudence,

seers of all things in prophecy,4 Resolute princes of the flock,

lawgivers and their rules,Sages skilled in composition,

authors of sharp proverbs,5 Composers of melodious psalms,

writers of lyric poems;6 Stalwart, solidly established,

at peace in their own estatesโ€”7 All these were glorious in their time,

illustrious in their day.8 Some of them left behind a name

so that people recount their praises.

Page 8: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

After the three patriarchs and Moses, he mentions:โ€ข Joshua,โ€ข the Judges,โ€ข Samuel,โ€ข Nathan,โ€ข David,โ€ข Solomon,โ€ข Jeroboam,โ€ข Elijah,โ€ข Hezekiah,โ€ข Isaiah,โ€ข Josiah,โ€ข Jeremiah,โ€ข Ezekiel,โ€ข Zerubbabel, andโ€ข Nehemiah.

Page 9: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

II MACCABEES 2:12โ€“13

So, Solomon kept those eight days. The same things also were reported in the writings and commentaries of Nehemiah; and how he, founding a library, gatheredtogether the acts of the kings, and the prophets, and of David, and the epistles of the kings concerning the holy gifts.

Page 10: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

JOSEPHUS: AGAINST APION BOOK I SECTION 8

For we have not an innumerable multitude of books among us, disagreeing from and contradicting one another, [as the Greeks have,] but only twenty-two books, which contain the records of all the past times; which are justly believed to be divine; and of them fivebelong to Moses, which contain his laws and the traditions of the origin of mankind till his death. This interval of time was little short of three thousand years; but as to the time from the death of Moses till the reign of Artaxerxes king of Persia, who reigned after Xerxes, the prophets, who were after Moses, wrote down what was done in their times in thirteen books. The remaining four books contain hymns to God, and precepts for the conduct of human life.

Page 11: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

It is true, our history hath been written since Artaxerxes very particularly, but hath not been esteemed of the like authority with the former by our forefathers, because there hath not been an exact succession of prophets since that time; and how firmly we have given credit to these books of our own nation is evident by what we do; for during so many ages as have already passed, no one has been so bold as either to add any thing to them, to take any thing from them, or to make any change in them; but it is become natural to all Jews immediately, and from their very birth, to esteem these books to contain Divine doctrines, and to persist in them, and, if occasion be willingly to die for them.

Page 12: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

โ€ข Of course, our Tanakh has a total of twenty-four books, rather than twenty-two, and the internal divisions are somewhat different as well, consisting of only eight books of Neviโ€™im and eleven books of Ketuvim. Since Josephusโ€™ assertion is recognizable as generally valid, it is conceivable that the discrepancies can be accounted for as follows:

โ€ข Three of the four books of โ€œhymnsโ€ and โ€œpreceptsโ€ are certainly Psalms, Proverbs, and Job. The fourth, based on Josephusโ€™s characterization of โ€œprecepts for the conduct of human life,โ€ probably is Ecclesiastes.

โ€ข Daniel, Esther, Ezra-Nehemiah, and Chronicles may be classified as prophetic-historical, based on Josephusโ€™s characterization of โ€œwhat was done in their times.โ€

โ€ข Ruth may have been appended to Judges and Lamentations to Jeremiah, consistent with the baraitaโ€™s assignment of their respective shared authorships and as witnessed in some editions of the Greek Septuagint.

Page 13: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

RABBINIC SOURCES FOR CANONIZATION

โ€ข Genizah: texts that were rejected from thecanon were concealed or sequestered;

โ€ข Tumโ€™at yadayim: scrolls containinggenuine biblical books defile oneโ€™s hands,i.e. impart a minor, rabbinically imposeddegree of ritual impurity.

Page 14: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

BT SHABBAT 115 A

Rabbi Yosei reported: Abba แธคalafta once visited Rabban Gamliโ€™el โ€ฆ in Tiberias and saw him seated at his table โ€ฆ reading a scroll of a targum of the Book of Job. He said to him: I well remember your grandfather, Rabban Gamliโ€™el [the Elder], who was standing on the slope of the Temple Mount when a scroll of a targum of the Book of Job was brought before him, and he instructed the mason to bury it beneath a course of stones. [Whereupon,] he [too] instructed that it be concealed.

ืื‘ืื‘ ื”ืฉืขืž :ื™ืกื•ื™ ื™ื‘ืจ ืจืžื ืœืื™ืœืžื’ ืŸื‘ืจ ืœืฆื ืšืœื”ืฉ ืืชืคืœื— ื‘ืฉื•ื™ ื”ื™ื”ืฉ ื•ืืฆืžื• ,ืื™ืจื‘ื˜ืœ ื™ื‘ื™ืจื‘ ื‘ื•ื™ื ืจืคืก ื•ื“ื™ื‘ื• โ€ฆื•ื ื—ืœื•ืฉ ืœืข :ื•ืœ ืจืžื .ื•ื‘ ืืจื•ืง ืื•ื”ื• ืื•ื’ืจืช ืšื™ื‘ื ื™ื‘ื ืœืื™ืœืžื’ ืŸื‘ืจื‘ ื™ื ื ืจื•ื›ื–

ืจื”ื‘ ื”ืœืขืž ื‘ื’ ืœืข ื“ืžื•ืข ื”ื™ื”ืฉ ื‘ื•ื™ื ืจืคืก ื•ื™ื ืคืœ ื•ืื™ื‘ื”ื• ,ืชื™ื‘ื” ืชื—ืช ื•ื”ืขืงืฉ :ื™ืื ื‘ืœ ืจืžืื• ,ืื•ื’ืจืช .ื•ื–ื ื’ื• ื•ื™ืœืข ื”ื•ื™ืฆ ืื•ื” ืฃื .ืšื‘ื“ื ื”

Page 15: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

SHABBAT 30 B

The Sages sought to conceal the Book of Ecclesiastes, because it is self-contradictory. Why, then, did they not conceal it? Because it [both] begins and ends with words of Torahโ€ฆ They also sought to conceal the Book of Proverbs because it was self-contradictory The Midrash (Kohelet Rabbah1:4) reports a different consideration, namely that some verses in Ecclesiastes appeared heretical (mattin le-แบ“ad minut).

ืจืคืกื–ื•ื ื’ืœ ืื™ืžื›ื— ื•ืฉืงื™ื‘ ื”ื– ืŸื™ืจืชื•ืก ื•ื™ืจื‘ื“ืฉ ื™ื ืคืžืชืœื”ืง

?ื•ื”ื•ื–ื ื’ ืืœ ื”ืž ื™ื ืคืžื• ,ื”ื– ืชื

ื”ืจื•ืช ื™ืจื‘ื“ ื•ืชืœื™ื—ืชืฉ ื™ื ืคืž ืจืคืก ืฃืื• โ€ฆื”ืจื•ืช ื™ืจื‘ื“ ื•ืคื•ืกื•

ื•ื™ืจื‘ื“ ื•ื™ื”ืฉ ,ื–ื•ื ื’ืœ ื•ืฉืงื™ื‘ ื™ืœืฉืž

.ื”ื– ืชื ื”ื– ืŸื™ืจืชื•ืก

Page 16: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

HAGIGAH 13 A

RavYehudah said: Indeed, that man, แธคananyah ben แธคizkiyah, should be remembered fondly. If not for him, the Book of Ezekiel would have been concealed, because it contradicted the Torah.

What did he do? They brought up 300 measures of oil, and he sat in his attic and analyzed it [and reconciled the contradictions].

ื•ืชื•ื ืจื•ื›ื– ,ืืจื‘ :ื”ื“ื•ื”ื™ ื‘ืจ ืจืžื .ื•ืžืฉ ื”ื™ืงื–ื— ืŸื‘ ื”ื™ื ื ื—ื• ,ื‘ื•ื˜ืœ ืฉื™ืื” ,ืœืืงื–ื—ื™ ืจืคืกื–ื ื’ื  ืื•ื” ืืœืžืœื .ื”ืจื•ืช ื™ืจื‘ื“ ืŸื™ืจืชื•ืก ื•ื™ืจื‘ื“ ื•ื™ื”ืฉ

ืชื•ืืž ืฉื•ืœืฉ ื•ืœ ื•ืœืขื” ?ื”ืฉืข ื”ืž.ื•ืฉืจื“ื• ื”ื™ื™ืœืขื‘ ื‘ืฉื™ื• ,ืŸืžืฉ ื™ื‘ืจื’

Page 17: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

MISHNAH YADAYIM 3:5โ€ข Holy Scriptures defile oneโ€™s hands.

โ€ข The Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes defile oneโ€™s hands.

โ€ข Rabbi Yehudah says: The Song of Songs defiles oneโ€™s hands, but there is a dispute regarding Ecclesiastes.

โ€ข Rabbi Yosei says: Ecclesiastes does not defile oneโ€™s hands, and the Song of Songs is in dispute.

โ€ข Rabbi Shimon says: [The status of] Ecclesiastes is one of the leniencies of the House of Shammai and stringencies of the House of Hillel.

.ืื™ื™ื“ื™ื” ืชื ืŸื™ืืžื˜ืž ืฉื“ื•ืงื” ื™ื‘ืชื›โ€ข

.ืื™ื“ื™ื” ืชื ืŸื™ืืžื˜ืž ืชืœื”ืงื• ืื™ืจื™ืฉื” ืจื™ืฉโ€ข

ืชื ืืžื˜ืž ืื™ืจื™ืฉื” ืจื™ืฉ :ืจืžื•ื ื”ื“ื•ื”ื™ ื™ื‘ืจโ€ข.ืชืงื•ืœื—ืž ืชืœื”ืงื• ืื™ื™ื“ื™ื”

ืชื ืืžื˜ืž ื•ื ื™ื ืชืœื”ืง :ืจืžื•ื ื™ืกื•ื™ ื™ื‘ืจโ€ข.ืชืงื•ืœื—ืž ืื™ืจื™ืฉื” ืจื™ืฉื• ืื™ื“ื™ื”

ื™ืืžืฉ ืชื™ื‘ ื™ืœื•ืงืž ืชืœื”ืง :ืจืžื•ื ืŸื•ืขืžืฉ ื™ื‘ืจโ€ข.ืœืœื” ืชื™ื‘ ื™ืจืžื•ื—ืžื•

Page 18: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

โ€ข Rabbi Shimon ben Azzai said: I have a tradition from the seventy-two elders, from the day that Rabbi Elazar ben Azaryahwas made dean of the yeshivah, that [both] the Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes defile oneโ€™s hands.

โ€ข Rabbi Akiva said: God forbid! No Jew ever questioned [the status of] the Song of Songs [and suggested] that it does not defile oneโ€™s hands, for all existence pales in comparison to the day that the Song of Songs was given to Israel. If all scriptures are holy, then the Song of Songs is of utmost holiness. If there was ever a dispute, it was only over Ecclesiastes

ื™ืคืž ื™ื ื ืœื‘ื•ืงืž :ื™ืื–ืข ืŸื‘ ืŸื•ืขืžืฉ ื™ื‘ืจ ืจืžืโ€ข ื•ื‘ื™ืฉื•ื”ืฉ ืื•ื™ื‘ ืŸืงื– ]ืื™ื™ื ืฉื• ืื™ืขื‘ืฉ[ ื‘"ืข ืจื™ืฉืฉ ื”ื‘ื™ืฉื™ื‘ ื”ื™ืจื–ืข ืŸื‘ ืจื–ืขืœื ื™ื‘ืจ ืชื.ืื™ื“ื™ื” ืชื ืื™ืืžื˜ืž ืชืœื”ืงื• ืื™ืจื™ืฉื”

ืงืœื—ื  ืืœ !ืื•ืœืฉื• ืกื— :ืื‘ื™ืงืข ื™ื‘ืจ ืจืžืโ€ข ืืžื˜ืช ืืœืฉ ืื™ืจื™ืฉื” ืจื™ืฉ ืœืข ืœืืจืฉื™ืž ืื“ื ืื•ื™ื› ื™ืื“ื› ื•ืœื› ืืœื•ืขื” ืœื› ืŸื™ืืฉ ,ืื™ื“ื™ื” ืชื ืœื›ืฉ ,ืœืืจืฉื™ืœ ืื™ืจื™ืฉื” ืจื™ืฉ ื•ื‘ ืŸืชื™ื ืฉ ,ืื™ืฉื“ืง ืฉื“ื•ืง ืื™ืจื™ืฉื” ืจื™ืฉื• ืฉื“ื•ืง ืื™ื‘ื•ืชื›.ืชืœื”ืง ืœืข ืืœื ื•ืงืœื—ื  ืืœ ,ื•ืงืœื—ื  ืืื•

Page 19: HOW TANAKH EVOLVED

Bโ€™MIDBAR RABBAH NASO 14โ€œMoreover, my son, bewareโ€ (Ecclesiastes 12:12). God said: I have written twenty-four books for you; beware lest you add to them.

Why? โ€œMaking many books endlesslyโ€: whoever reads [liturgically] a verse that is not from the twenty-four books is judged as if he were reading from an illegitimate book. Therefore โ€œbeware the making of many books,โ€ because one who does so has no share in the World to Come.

,ื‘ืดื™ ืชืœื”ืง( "ืจื”ื–ื™ื” ,ื™ื ื‘ ,ื”ืžื”ืž ืจืชื•ื™ื•" ืื™ืจืฉืข[ื“"ื› :ืื•ื” ืšื•ืจื‘ ืฉื•ื“ืงื” ืจืžื .)ื‘ืดื™

ืœืื• ืจื”ื–ื™ื” ;ืšืœ ื™ืชื‘ืชื›ืื™ืจืคืก ]ื”ืขื‘ืจืื• .ืื”ื™ืœืข ืฃืกื•ืช

ืœื›โ€“"ืฅืง ืŸื™ื ื”ื‘ืจื” ืื™ืจืคืก ืชื•ืฉืข" ?ื”ืžืœ

ื”ืขื‘ืจืื• ืื™ืจืฉืขืž ื•ื ื™ืืฉ ืงื•ืกืค ืืจื•ืงืฉ ื™ืž .ืื™ื ื•ืฆื™ื—ื” ืื™ืจืคืกื‘ ืืจื•ืง ื•ืœื™ืื› ,ืื™ืจืคืก

ืœื›ืฉ ,"ื”ื‘ืจื” ืื™ืจืคืก ืชื•ืฉืข ืจื”ื–ื™ื”" ื™ื•ื”.ืื‘ื” ืืœื•ืขืœ ืงืœื— ื•ืœ ืŸื™ื ,ืŸื› ื”ืฉื•ืขื”