how not to suck at research productivity
DESCRIPTION
Student guideTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: How Not to Suck at Research Productivity](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022020417/563db7ff550346aa9a8f9762/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
How not to suck at research productivityIf you want to be a writer you must do two things above all others: read a lot and
write a lot -- Stephen King
Graduate school is about mastering a topic and then being able to make a
contribution to this topic by adding original thought, and then put it into clear
writing. So you must become an expert. Yes, I am talking to you, a future expert.
Being an expert means that you must have read every relevant journal article
and book chapter on the topic. Knowing other related topics also helps. The
conservative estimate is that for every paper you write, you must have read 75
papers or book chapters. Read, read, and read some more. And do not forget to
take organized notes, so you do not forget what you read.
In classes, you get a survey of information. Rarely does any class, even the most
advanced, get truly deep into any topic. If you treat graduate school as a
collection of classes, then you will never be a master of the material. And you
will not be worthy of receiving a masters degree and certainly not a doctorate
degree. In this lab and in graduate school in general you must drill deeply. You
need to have a survey knolwedge of all areas and truly deep knowledge and
mastery in a few areas. Both breadth and depth of knowledge are required to be
a good school psychologist. You receive breadth of knowledge from classes and
clinical work. You receive depth of knowledge through writing and your work in
this lab.
The more mastery you have of a topic, then more likely you are to make a
creative contribution. Remember that iconoclastic painters such as Picasso,
Pollock, Matisse, Monet, and Van Gogh did not develop their distinctive styles on
their own. They were all classically trained artists who developed mastery of
multiple techniques, color patterns, and brushing/knife styles. Once they
developed mastery of a host of techniques and styles, only then were able to
develop their own unique creative style.
The biggest trap in all of academics is that you know all of the information, have
excellent writing skills, have wonderful methodology, sparkling conclusions, but
the article you have produced is little more than professionally prepared bullshit.
The vast majority of published papers fall into this category. Just because a
paper is published, does not mean it is valuable. You can slice bologna with a
scalpel and BS with laser, but it is still bologna and BS. You can only say
something valuable if you are an expert. Most bologna and BS papers are written
![Page 2: How Not to Suck at Research Productivity](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022020417/563db7ff550346aa9a8f9762/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
by very smart people who engaged in laziness, poor scholarship, and pedestrian
thinking. "Rise above by digging deep" -- Shaun T.
How do you become a prolific scholar, knowledgeable school psychologist, and
excellent lab member? Follow these steps:
1. Budget your time so that 1-3 hours per day are carved out of your schedule
to develop your expertise.
2. Talk it out. Argue, debate, and discuss ideas with other experts (e.g., fellow
labbies).
3. Read a lot every day (yes, that is every day). You need to read 100 pages per
day. Probably 50-75 of those pages will be assigned readings in class. The
remainder of the pages are papers designed to build expertise.
4. You need to write 500 original words per day. Most of us write a total of
2,500 words per day if you include assignments, e-mails, reports, logs,
business, and other activities. But make sure that you write 500 words per
day of original scholarly thought. Usually these 500 words are for a
manuscript, presentation proposal, grant proposal, thesis, REB proposals, or
something like this. “Write a lot every day. Quantity produces quality. If you
only write a few things you’re doomed.” -- Ray Bradbury
Common problems
1. I do not have time. This is one of the few things that you will say that is
guaranteed to upset me. You always have time for the most important thing.
Your time frees up when you do not eat, sleep, or go to the bathroom. When you
say that you do not have time, you are telling me that other things are more
important. And often, other things are more important. But you need to prioritize
carefully. If you do not have time to become an expert, then you do not have time
to be a member of this lab or in graduate school.
2. I don’t know how to start.
a. Start with an outline. Write out each heading
b. Remember the 5/5/5 default. That is, write five sections (an intro, three
supporting sections, and a conclusion), each section is made up of five
paragraphs (an intro, three supporting paragraphs, and a conclusion), and each
![Page 3: How Not to Suck at Research Productivity](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022020417/563db7ff550346aa9a8f9762/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
paragraph is made up of five sentences (a topic sentence, three supporting
sentences, and a closing sentence).
c. Write all of the topic sentences.
d. Write all of the closing sentences.
e. Fill in the supporting sentences
f. Writer’s block is simply another word for laziness – Elmore Leonard
3. I write too slowly. Never ever ever(!) edit while you write. There are
many different and good styles and approaches, but this never works! “Write
drunk. Edit sober.” -- Ernest Hemmingway.
a. Spend 33% of your time getting it all out on paper and 67% of the time
editing. But get the first draft out. Write with abandon and get it all out on paper
—then edit. Don’t worry about running out of ideas. The well will refill for the
next day—if you have mastered the topic, I promise this will happen.
b. How I do it: I dictate for two hours per day using speech recognition
software (Dragon Naturally Speaking 11.5). That is about 1,600 to 2,000 words.
Then I spend about three hours editing what I just wrote. Remember that I can
only write that many words because I have read so much that the ideas come
quickly.
4. Writing and the judgment of my writing scares me. Join the club. And
then get over it. Your writing will only get better with editing and supervised
revision. Remember it is your writing, it is not you. It is rarely personal. Steve’s
rule: if your paper has tons of corrections on it from me, then that is a good
thing. That means that your paper is so good, that it is worth my time and effort
to make it better. The worst is when you have a lot of corrections on the first 2-3
pages and then no more corrections. Your writing did not get better—either I got
bored with your writing or your paper is not worth my time of doing a revision.
Writing is never easy and often painful. But we will get through the process
together. “It looks like you can write a minimalist piece without much bleeding.
And you can. But not a good one.” – David Foster Wallace.
Become a master, then create something every day. Do this and you will not suck
at writing and research productivity.
![Page 4: How Not to Suck at Research Productivity](https://reader031.vdocuments.mx/reader031/viewer/2022020417/563db7ff550346aa9a8f9762/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)