horizontal logging for mechanical anisotropy effects

Upload: twirx

Post on 04-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    1/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 1

    Horizontal Logging for

    Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    2/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 2

    Horizontal Evaluation - Options

    Open Hole ShaleLOGOpen Hole drill pipe conveyed Triple Combo-GEM-CSNG-Wavesonic X-Y Dipole.Generally perceived risk of differential sticking

    Alternate LWD Triple Combo & BAT Dipole as wipe pass unless needed foractive steering. If high mudweight, LWD Pe lithology interp is useless.

    LaserStrat sample analysis for relative brittleness & mechanical proxy.

    Cased Hole ShaleLOGLog an RMT-E pulsed neutron log (flasked if over 265F) on E-Coil, pump down,or wireline tractor. Compute a CHI Modeled Triple Combo with lithology from gainstabilized capture spectra for Silica and Calcite yields.

    If quality cement, hostile Wavesonic can be run for DTC, DTSX, & DTSY. UseCHI Triple and lithology data in ShaleLOG. Pick optimum spots for fractureplacement and initiation.

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    3/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 3

    RMT

    TM

    CHI Model

    TM

    Shalelog

    TM

    Calibrated to Vertical Open Hole X-Y Dipole Wavesonic & GEM

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    4/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 4

    Horizontal Cased Hole ShalelogHaynesville Core Area - Pulsed Neutron RMT

    No frac issues encountered & hybrid gel design

    Brittleness index varying between 37-552010

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    5/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 5

    Brittleness Index vs Gas Production

    Post Frac Production Log day 45, well flowing 9MM

    2010

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    6/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 6

    LaserStratTM- LIBS Chemostratigraphy

    Sample Cuttings Mechanical Properties

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    7/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 7

    Laserstrat - SE Haynesville & Bossier Zonation

    ChemoGRSM

    Haynesville

    Bossier

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    8/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 8

    Projected LaserStratChemosteeringResultsHaynesville Bossier

    ShaleLogBrittleness Analysis

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    9/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 9

    Triaxial Stress TestingHaynesville Full Core

    Layered horizontal anisotropy tied to clay volume!

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    10/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 10

    Complete Horizontal Evaluation Program

    20 Sample Cuttings for LIBS Chemostratigraphy &

    Relative Brittleness

    Open Hole LWD Quad Combo (includes rotated

    Dipole Sonic)

    Cased Hole Pulsed Neutron Spectroscopy

    Neural Net calibration of PNS to LWD data and

    compute Shale Evaluation with modelled mechanical

    properties

    SPE 132990

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    11/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 11

    LWD Horizontal Dipole SonicDual Shear Detection, DTSslow & DTSfast

    TIVratio = DTSslow / DTSfast

    Low TIV ratio = more brittle,higher fracture complexity

    High TIV ratio = more ductile,less fracture complexity

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    12/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 12

    Clay Volume, BRIT Index, & TIVratio Link

    Propose: FracIndex = BRITIndex/ TIVratio

    Essentially raises or lowers effective BRIT Index bylayering effects that TIV Ratio is sensitive to

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    13/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 13

    Horizontal Project Vertical Control Wells

    vs. Actual Lateral Placement

    2010 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved

    T.W George A8H

    HaynesvilleA

    Haynesville

    B

    HaynesvilleC

    CGU 13-17HT.W George A8H

    HaynesvilleA

    Haynesville

    B

    HaynesvilleC

    CGU 13-17H

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    14/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 14

    BP George A9H 9 of 10 Water Fracs Placed PL rate 8.2 MMCF/D

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    15/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 15

    BP CGU 13-17H 6 of 10 Fracs Placed > 50% PL rate 4.5 MMCF/D

    Prop 62.2% Prop 85.3% Prop 79% Prop 29.5% Prop 2.6% Prop 89.5% Prop 100% Prop 3% Prop 55.4% Prop 35%

    XX XX

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    16/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 16

    Frac Results Simplified

    Near Wellbore Region (1 -2 ft)

    High injection pressure

    Pad and proppant entry High pressure drawdown during

    flowback

    Higher Clay Interval

    Smaller fracture width

    Increased likelihood ofscreenout

    Lower gas production

    Lower Clay Interval

    Wider fracture width

    Better chance of placingproppant

    Better gas production

    Near Wellbore Region (1 -2 ft)

    Higher injection pressure

    Pad and proppant entry High pressure drawdown during

    flowback

    Higher Clay Interval

    Smaller effective fracture width & less h

    Increased likelihood ofscreenout

    Lower gas productionHigher embedment

    Lower Clay Interval

    Wider effective fracture width & h

    Better chance of placingproppant & achieving complexity

    Better gas production

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    17/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 17

    Horizontal Evaluation Conclusions

    Because of layered horizontal anisotropy effects, optimal evaluationshould include horizontal open hole LWD dipole or cased hole crossdipole sonic for slow & fast shear detection.

    Triple Combo & lithology inputs from either LWD suite or PNS NeuralNet can be used for total clay volume and a horizontal anisotropyestimate by proxy.

    LIBS sample analysis is a viable mechanical proxy unless shale is toohomogenous over horizontal, (assumes good hole cleaning).

    Use formation evaluation for frac optimization. Plan frac stages bysimilar mechanical properties. Fewer entry points per stage appearreasonable in softer shales.

    Lateral placement rules dictate well performance. Fracs placed inclay rich, or other layered, highly horizontal anisotropic rock, willunderperform because of near well chokes and limited heightgrowth.

  • 8/13/2019 Horizontal Logging for Mechanical Anisotropy Effects

    18/18

    2009 Halliburton. All Rights Reserved. 18

    Thank You!