homeslice berkeley 2016

48
First.. A quick video

Upload: steve-blank

Post on 06-Jan-2017

38.280 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

First.. A quick video

Page 2: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

HomeSlice

• Primary homes• Peer-to-peer financing• Mortgage brokering service

We talked to 101 people!

Making real estate more accessible through fractional ownership

• Investment properties• Lender financing• End-to-end home-buying solution

Making real estate more accessible through fractional ownership

A $518B market

Page 3: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

The Team

Anna Roumiantseva

Product

Anne ReadyMarketing

PJ O’NeilFinance

Raj AgrawalTech

The Mentors

Rick Lazansky

Mike Olson

Lev Mass

Page 4: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

You saw how we pivoted to focusing on investment properties…

…but there was a lot more to our journey than that.

Page 5: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Week 1: To be in real estate, you need to know something about real estate?• What the home-buying process looked

like• How mortgage underwriting worked• Who the key players were• Where the money was made in the real

estate industry• What do we even really mean by a

fractional mortgage

Page 6: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

This market is highly regulated and has more than 2 sides.. And they’re each motivated in different ways!

Mortgage Title of House

Loan Servicer

Lender

Institutional Investor

Real Estate Agents Sellers

+ Mortgage brokers+ Title companies+ Lawyers+ Appraisers+…

Page 7: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Starting Business Model Canvas

Page 8: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Starting Business Model Canvas

Page 9: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Customers are interested…

Not interested: 8%

Definitely Interested: 22%

Potentially interested:70%

We asked over 100 customers.. how interested are you in using HomeSlice?

Page 10: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

…So why don’t they do this today?Our first MVP was a card sort to get potential buyers to show us what their biggest barriers are today to shared home ownership

4.2 3.9 3.8 3.2 2.8

Where we focused much of our energy

Upcoming MVP: Co-owner

Matchmaking

Upcoming MVP: Secondary

Marketplace

Q. Rank the following concerns about co-ownership in order of importance to you, 6 being most important

Page 11: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Additionally, concerns about co-owner agreements dominated customer feedback

“I've always talked about co-owning a property with friends from high school and college. This is a great idea! … The only downside, from my perspective, is that people have different personalities and preferences and sometimes they have struggled when deciding what to do in terms of remodeling or improving certain things on the house.”-C. Toscana-Rodriguez, Haas MBA 2017

Page 12: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

So we made a second MVP….We Learned: Helping users understand and decide on all of the necessary details of co-ownership provides significant value when pursuing real estate investments via LLC.

“It was incredibly difficult for us to draft our co-ownership agreement until we brought in expert advice. We also didn’t initially have the right connections to lenders – a platform like this would have been a big help.”-Victoria Volkar, Haas EWMBA 2018

Page 13: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Customer ArchetypeMillennials:

People aged 25-34 who haven’t owned real estate

before...

Investment Properties:

…seeking hands-on real estate

investments…

$

Coastal / Expensive Cities:

…in popular cities with high rent to income

ratios

Page 14: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Moving on to the second side of our market, we considered several possible types of lenders

Peer-to-Peer Institutional Investors Traditional Lenders

Page 15: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Working with traditional lenders made it difficult to maintain our customer value proposition

1. No lender will deal with a fractional default

1. Separate mortgages for each co-owner2. Individuals are each guarantors for themselves 3. New mortgage product

3. Banks like things they recognize

2. They want guarantors on the mortgage

1. One mortgage for the home, under an LLC2. HomeSlice as guarantor, backed by Private Equity firm or Institutional Investor3. Mortgage under LLCs have existed for a long time

Our initial MVP: what we thought.

What we learned.

How we pivoted: our new MVP.

Page 16: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

With our new MVP, institutional investors want in!Investors are excited about the opportunity to invest in real estate in new ways and see multiple ways to partner

• Acting as the guarantor to HomeSlice mortgages so that individual buyers don’t have to

• Buying out slices when owners choose to sell them off (or default)

Page 17: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Value proposition iterations flow through the BMC

Page 18: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

What the final product looks like TODAY

Page 19: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

HomeSlice removes barriers for borrowers…Effortless process to align with co-owners on purchase and management terms

1. Legal structure to

allow sales of home slices

2. Roadmap to manage

potential default of co-owners

3.

Page 20: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

  One home

 One single mortgage for the entire property

…while keeping things the same for lenders (while opening up a new market!)

Lender underwrites loan

Institutional investor holds the paper

Page 21: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

HomeSlice makes money during origination and upon monthly mortgage repayment

Buyers

Lender

2.5% fee to borrowers over 6 years$3.5K total

Downpayment & Monthly Repayments

Loan

0.5% origination fee to both lender & borrowers = $4K total

$7,500 LTV for borrowers over 6 years (>50% realized immediately)

Potential for many other value-added services to generate extra revenue

$1000 CAC

Page 22: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

The potential is huge…

* Based on median home price by city and 80% loan-to-value ratio

Top 10 US metro areas

25-34 yrs old

53-77% below income threshold to afford to

own

50% would want to own if

they could

3M People$518B

Lending Opportunity

People Who Want To Buy But Can’t*

Page 23: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

…but we need to act fast

$8M Series A investment by a16z in Sept 2016!

New player coming in (Seattle):

Page 24: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Immediate Next Steps• Continue to build out a front-end website• Model out return profile for institutional investors /

initial financing partners• Complete our first beta transactions for a batch

of customers

Page 25: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

HomeSlice is democratizing home ownership.

We invite you to join us!

Thanks to: Mentors, Classmates, Teaching Team

Page 26: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Appendix

Page 27: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Our third MVP was centered around the details of default mitigation, a sticking point for VCs, PEs, and lenders

Page 28: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Big Idea #2 – Co-Owners Need BabysittingOur second MVP was centered around the user interface with our platform to understand how we can best deliver value to them

We Learned: Aligning with co-buyers on purchase and maintenance terms is a HUGE pain point currently standing in the way of shared ownership.If borrowers can’t figure this piece out, they won’t want to co-purchase homes (even with no cross-party liability)

We Did:Made this a key value-add of our platform and brought it to the forefront of the interface

Page 29: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Big Idea #4 – It Needs To Be Personal

We learned that lenders always require a personal guarantor on a residential mortgage who can demonstrate that he/she is capable of paying it back (even for LLCs)

BUT…talked to PE lenders and figured out a way to make HomeSlice the guarantor

PE firms are looking for new investment opportunities in real estate and may be interested in providing bridge financing for HS backed mortgages or contributing capital for HomeSlice buy-outs of defaulting slices

Page 30: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Big Idea #5Investment property use case is easier for people to swallow – even Millennials (69% of people surveyed were interested vs. 34% for primary residence)

Page 31: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Customer Segments• Millennials aged 25-34 who

haven’t owned a home before and are looking to build their assets

• Family members of first-time home buyers

• Couples who aren’t married but want to live together and build their assets

• CMO investors looking for new opportunities

• Low-income individuals who qualify for an FHA loan

• House-rich, cash-poor baby boomers

KEY LEARNINGS

• Many Millennials have family members who could help with the purchase, but the lack of system to make it a “real investment” stops them from asking

• Low-income segments bring a flurry of additional challenges and are a hard place to focus initially

• There are already lots of solutions available for people who want to cash out home equity

Page 32: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Value Proposition• Catalyzing first-time home purchases

• Increasing access to income-generating investment properties

• Taking the counter-party risk out of shared ownership

• Facilitating the drafting of legal documents for shared ownership (co-owner agreement, LLC docs)

• Understanding the financial benefits of renting vs. buying

• Increasing liquidity of RE investments• Cashing out of real estate

investments without refinancing• Enabling the shared purchase of

vacation homes• Using peer to peer lending to

facilitate home ownership

KEY LEARNINGS

• HomeSlice can make home ownership seem cool again to Millennials (“won’t have to move to Orinda to buy”)

• Investment property use case is easier for people to swallow – even Millennials (69% of people surveyed were interested vs. 34% for primary residence)

• HomeSlice can deliver maximum value if it reduces counter-party risk for borrowers while keeping things status quo for lenders (single property = single mortgage)

• Agreeing on terms of property ownership and management is a HUGE pain point for co-owners

Page 33: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Status Quo Process for the Lenders

  

One home 

Lender underwrites loan

Institutional investor holds the paper

One single mortgage for

the entire property

BENEFITS:• Access to a new market of buyers• No additional complexity of tracking and managing payments

Page 34: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Less Complexity and Risk for the Borrowers

BENEFITS:• Reduced financial hurdle of a first home purchase to start building assets • Reduced counter-party default risk• Reduced legal and tax complexity of shared ownership (e.g. co-owner agreement)

Legal structure to allow sales of home slices:

Measures to manage counter-party default risk:• Mortgage insurance provides a 6-

month window to avoid foreclosure1. Other slice owners have first

rights to buying the default slice2. New owner buys default slice3. Entire property is sold

Page 35: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Channels • Direct to Customer

• Real Estate Agents

• Banks (mortgage lenders)

• Large companies via financial wellness programs

• Mortgage Brokers

KEY LEARNINGS

• Real estate agents really function as gate keepers to the industry (via their relationships with sellers), it will be important to work with them from the beginning

• Banks can’t be incentivized to use HomeSlice, and they’re very traditional – selling through them isn’t really feasible, but they may provide a way to target individuals who didn’t qualify for a full mortgage

• Similarly mortgage brokers can’t be incentivized, and we’re in a slightly competitive position to them

Page 36: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Customer Relationships• Educator – when & how to buy

• Simple, easy to understand, one stop shop for fractional mortgages

• Social impact – enabling home ownership

• Real estate broker replacement

• Underwriter

• Legal advisor

• Fully vertically integrated bank

KEY LEARNINGS

• There’s a lot of discrepancy in what individuals know about the financial trade-offs of buying homes and a lot of opportunity to help them through the process

• Whether we focus on investment properties or primary homes, our basic motivation is to enable home ownership (& this resonates with investors too!)

• Underwriting and legal advising imply significant costs & difficulties, with ambiguous benefits – we need to explore these more

Page 37: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Key Partners• Lenders (mortgage providers)

• Private Equity / Institutional Investors

• Real estate brokers

• Loan servicers

• Property developers

• Insurance companies

• Mortgage brokers

KEY LEARNINGS

• Need debt financing to do this at any sort of scale, which means playing within the existing ecosystem

• TICs have been top-performing loans for lenders (~0% default rates, even during housing crisis)

• PE firms are looking for new investment opportunities in real estate and may be interested in providing bridge financing for HS backed mortgages or contributing capital for HomeSlice buy-outs of defaulting slices

Page 38: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Petal DiagramWe Are Not Alone But We Have a New Angle

In addition to the diagram, HomeSlice also competes with other investment alternatives, ranging from REITs to Wealth Management companies

Page 39: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Key Activities & Resources• Customer service

• Legal & tax support

• Mortgage brokerage

• Payment collection & processing

• Software dev

• Marketing & growth

• Biz dev

• Realtor

KEY LEARNINGS

• We projected that launching the ‘whole enchilada’ would cost us about $1M a year in expenses in our first year of full operation..

• However, we think that hacking the process really requires very little besides up-front capital to qualify HomeSlice for guarantor-ship and strategic partnerships with a willing law firm & a bank

Page 40: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

MonthlyMortgage payment+ 2.5% processing+1.0% insurance premium

   

Previous Owner

 

Real Estate Agents (buyer & seller side)

Or other institutional investors, accessed

through a loan servicer

Or other lender

Cash Flow Diagram:

Up-Front: 20% of down payment+ 6% Realtor Fees+1.5% Closing Fee for bank+ .5% Closing Fee for HS

Up-Front: .5% origination fee for HS

Up-Front100% of home+6% Closing Fee

MonthlyMortgage payment

Up-Front1.5% Closing Fee

Page 41: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Revenue Structure• Upfront borrower fees

• Upfront origination fee (paid by banks)

• Ongoing mortgage payment fees

• Refinancing origination fee

• Mortgage insurance premiums

• Value added service sales

• Real estate brokerage commission

KEY LEARNINGS

• Large fees are assessed upon closing of a property – there is opportunity to add fees at this point in the transaction

• HomeSlice can function as a mortgage broker and collect fees in the same fashion

• There are many regulations surrounding loan servicers. It is still TBD if HomeSlice would serve this role or partner with an established loan servicing provider.

• While it may be necessary for HomeSlice to play the role of real estate agent, we will limit our ability to scale if we play that role indefinitely. Playing this role will also limit our ability to partner with agents locally.

Page 42: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Cost Structure• Customer Service

• Mortgage Brokerage

• Software Development

• Marketing & Growth / Biz Dez

• Payment Collection & Processing

• Legal and Tax Support

• Real Estate Brokerage

KEY LEARNINGS

• Once we have developed a LLC and co-owner template, we likely do not need to have many legal resources on staff, as any disagreements on the legal documents are resolved between co-owners, not owners and HomeSlice

• We likely do not need to build real estate brokerage resources, as much of that will be outsourced to realtor partners

• Many of these costs can be “hacked” in Years 0 and 1 as we manually close real estate deals

Page 43: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Buyer Economics

Buying with HomeSlice is 15% CHEAPER than Renting

• Shorter duration

• Higher mortgage rate

• Higher closing costs

Page 44: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

TAM - Latent DemandPeople Who Want To Buy But Can’tTop 10 US metro areas

25-34 yrs old53-77% below

income threshold to

afford to own

50% would want to own if they

could

3M people

$518B lending

opportunity

* Based on median home price by city and 80% loan-to-value ratio

Page 45: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

We Iterated A Lot On Our Business Model

Page 46: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Final CanvasMillennials aged 25-34 who haven’t owned a home before and are looking to build their assets

Catalyzing first-time home purchases

Increasing access to income-generating investment properties

Removing counter-party risk from shared ownership

Facilitating the drafting of legal documents for shared ownership (co-owner agreement, LLC docs)

Educator – when & how to buy

Simple, easy to understand, one stop shop for fractional mortgages

Direct to Customer

Real Estate Agents

Customer serviceLegal & tax supportMortgage brokeragePayment collection & processingSoftware dev Marketing & growthBusiness development

Lenders (mortgage providers)

Private Equity / Institutional Investors

Real estate brokers

Loan servicers Platform

PE funding to allow HomeSlice to “back” the mortgages

Marketing (direct & PR) & growthCustomer serviceSoftware development SG&A

Closing cost fee (buyer)Origination fee (lender)

Page 47: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Immediate Next Steps• Model out return profile for institutional investors /

initial financing partners• Understand legal implications of HomeSlice being

on mortgage and LLC being on title• Continue to pitch to lenders, need a lender

partner• Build a functioning front-end website

Page 48: HomeSlice Berkeley 2016

Expansion Roadmap

Highest population density +

Highest real estate prices =

Biggest concentration of users who can’t currently afford to buy