homeland security and the future of criminal justice
DESCRIPTION
Homeland Security and the Future of Criminal Justice. An Introduction to Terrorism. Defining Homeland Security: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Homeland Security and the Future of Criminal Justice
An Introduction to TerrorismDefining Homeland Security: A concerted national effort to prevent terrorist
attacks within the United States, reduce America’s vulnerability to terrorism, and minimize the damage and recover from attacks that do occur.
An Introduction to TerrorismDefining Terrorism: The unlawful use of force against persons or
property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
An Introduction to Terrorism
Terrorists have evolved into non-state actors.
Today the dominant strain of terrorism mixes strong political goals with very strong religious affiliations. (But it really is all about hatred.)
An Introduction to TerrorismUnderstanding terrorism: Osama bin Laden Al Qaeda (The “Base”) Global Jihad =
The struggle against evil in oneself (traditional) The struggle against evil outside of oneself
(fundamental) The struggle against non-believers (Extremist)
An Introduction to TerrorismTrends in International Terrorism: Terrorism has become progressively bloodier. Terrorists have developed more efficient means of
managing their finances (including criminal enterprises).
Terrorists have developed more efficient models of organization. (Umbrella / Cells of same believers)
Terrorists are able to mount global campaigns with the help of countries who support terrorism against the West.
Terrorists have exploited new communication technology. (Sat. Comm.)
The Terrorist Threat
Types of WMD’s: Biological weapons Chemical weapons Nuclear weapons Radiological weapons Explosives (IED)
The Terrorist ThreatConventional Explosives: IEDs
Often constructed by amateurs Used in more than 70% of terror attacks
CBRNE First Responders to CBRNE
Different categories of weaponry can be mixed and matched
RDDs “dirty-bombs”
The Homeland Security Response
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death
Penalty Act (AEDPA): Passed in 1995 in response to the Oklahoma
City bombings Prohibits persons from providing material
support to foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs)
The Homeland Security ResponseThe Patriot Act: Designed to “level the playing field.” Makes it easier for law enforcement to collect
information about suspected terrorists and detain them.
Enhances the ability of the government to keep non citizens suspected of terrorist activities out of the United States.
Targets the fundraising activities of terrorist organizations.
The Homeland Security ResponseThe Patriot Act: Relaxes restrictions on information sharing between
government agencies. Creates a crime of “knowingly harboring a terrorist.” Allows greater freedom in seizing email. Funds allow the tripling of border patrol agents, customs
inspectors, and immigration agents. Non-citizens can be detained up to seven days without being
informed of the charges against them. Eliminates the statute of limitations for terror-related
offenses.
The Homeland Security ResponseFederal agencies outside the DHS: The FBI is considered the “lead” agency in the fight
against terrorism Strategic Information Operations Centers (Fusion)
Intelligence Agencies Electronic surveillance Human-source collection Open-source collection Counterintelligence CIA and NSA
State and Local Counterterrorism Efforts
The Homeland Security Response
Issues with the response to terrorism: Terror related investigations have strained
local law enforcement resources and led to crime increases in some areas.
Communication difficulties have led to dissatisfaction for many local agencies.
Counterterrorism Challenges and Strategies
Preventive Policing 7 Signs of Terrorism
The Criminal Justice model Terrorism is treated like any other crime AEDPA and the Patriot Act
Counterterrorism Challenges and Strategies
The Intelligence Model Regards terrorism as a threat to the state rather
than a traditional crime Reforming the FBI (Intelligence / Counter
Terrorism) The Military model: Hooah
The military, rather, than the criminal justice system, is the appropriate responder to terror issues.
“Enemy Combatants”
Border Security
Regulated Ports of entry 88 million foreign visitors arrive through
America’s more than 100 international airports, with millions more crossing the borders with Mexico and Canada.
Unregulated Ports of Entry 3 million people illegally cross into the United
States through the borders with Mexico and Canada each year.
The Double-Edged Sword: Security vs. Civil-Liberties
Rights during wartime. Inevitable conflict.
Searches, surveillance, and security.
The Double-Edged Sword: Security vs. Civil-Liberties
Due Process and Indefinite Detention: The 5th amendment “person” versus “citizen” Unlawful Combatants Rasul v. Bush (2004)
The Double-Edged Sword: Security Versus Civil-Liberties
Military Tribunals “Enemy Combatants” tried by military
tribunals rather than civilian courts. No right to trial by jury. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006)
Criminal Justice: Looking to the Future
What does the future hold? Immigration law to combat drug trafficking
and terrorism