hkdse candidates’ performance 2014 in paper i (q6 14) · 2014-11-20 · 6 (a) fair • about half...
TRANSCRIPT
HKDSE 2014
17, 21 November 2014
Candidates’ Performance in Paper I (Q6‐14)
6 (a) Fair
• about half of the candidates failed to mention the relationship between the boiling point and the molecular size/chain length of the alkene molecules.
• wrongly stated that the separation was based on the melting point of the alkanes.
6 (a) Fair
• definition of standard enthalpy change of combustion ‐‐ failed to give a complete answer including ‘enthalpy change involved’, ‘one mole of substance’, ‘complete combustion’ and ‘under standard conditions’.
• chemical equation – missing state symbols
6 (b) Fair
• misspelt ‘catalytic converter’.
• calculation of the standard enthalpy change – incorrect ‘+ / –’ signs for the enthalpy terms
7 (a) Poor
• unable to calculate the concentration of the acid by using the data of density and % by mass of HCl in the acid.
• converting the density 1.18 g cm–3 into g dm–3
‐ divided 1.18 by 1000 instead of multiply it by 1000
7 (b) Poor
• Commonly observed mistakes include ‐ treating the whole process as a dilution of a
concentrated acid, ‐ failing to use distilled water / deionized
water for dissolving Na2CO3, ‐ wrongly dissolving the sodium carbonate
powder directly inside the volumetric flask, ‐ using inappropriate apparatus
7 (c) Poor
• Only a few candidates realised that HCl(g) would escape from concentrated hydrochloric acid.
8 Satisfactory
• Part (a) ‐ failed to realise that H+ are easier to be reduced than Mg2+
• Part (b) ‐ confused about the anodic and cathodic changes which occurred in beaker B
• Part (c) – Very good
• Part (d) ‐ Fair
9 Satisfactory
• Part (a) – some candidates gave wrong colour for the copper(II) hydroxide
• Part (b) – common mistakes for the chemical equations given for KMnO4 and Na2SO3: ‐ failed to give balanced equations ‐ only gave the half equation for the reduction
‐of MnO4
10 Fair Common mistakes • use of more concentrated HCl (e.g. 2 M or 4 M) • omitted the description of diluting the given1 M HCl to obtain solutions of different concentrations. • failed to mention how to perform a faircomparison. (e.g. kept constant for theexperimental conditions)
11 • Part (a) – Satisfactory
• Part (b) – Poor • failed to give the correct colour • only stated the colour of the solution without giving a reason
• failed to point out that VO2+ received 2
electrons from SO2
12 (a) Fair • did not give a specific example for the reagent Y
• Very few candidates were able to give an explanation for the higher solubility of sodium benzoate when compared with benzoic acid. • confused about obtaining an insoluble substance from a mixture with that of obtaining a soluble compound from a solution.
12 (a) Satisfactory • wrongly suggested the use of Br2 to carry out the final step
• wrongly suggested treating the intermediate C6H5CH2OH with concentrated H2SO4 to give a non‐existing alkene before adding HBr.
13 (a) Satisfactory Common mistakes • Failed to correctly calculate the amounts of thevarious species at equilibrium (molecalculation) • Used incorrect container volume (50 cm3 vs. 50 dm3) • Incorrect numerical calculations / units /significant figures
14 Fair • Part (a) ‐Many candidates had no idea about the structure of a triglyceride
• Part (c) – Some omitted H+ when using K2Cr2O7
or KMnO4 for the chemical test • Part (d) – Wrong answers include like addition, hydrolysis, saponification and esterification, etc.
General Comments Candidates are general weak in • Calculations (calculations involved in reactions, equilibrium and volumetric analysis) • Describe correct procedures, even for simple practical tasks (preparation of standard solutions, isolating a substance from a mixture, etc.)
General Comments Candidates are general weak in • Explain physical properties of substances using chemical concepts – bonding and structure (boiling/melting points, solubilities, etc.) • Did not read the questions carefully