historical foundation of management

42
Historical Foundations of Management Prepared By : ZAREEN SHAIKH, SZABIST Larkana Session-2 Class-BBA.2

Upload: sabih-kamran

Post on 11-Apr-2017

37 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Historical Foundation Of Management

Historical Foundations of Management

Prepared By : ZAREEN SHAIKH, SZABIST LarkanaSession-2

Class-BBA.2

Page 2: Historical Foundation Of Management

It gives executives a way of thinking, a way of searching for patterns and understanding trends. It provides a context or environment in which to interpret current problems.

Forces: Social, political, economic

Why is history Important?

Page 3: Historical Foundation Of Management

Management and Organization Social Forces:

– The aspect of culture that guide and influence relationship among people – their values, needs and standard of behaviors ( Sindhi Values, American Culture, African Culture)

Political Forces:– The influence of political and legal institution on

organization and people ( Courts, Company Reg.Act 1973, Labor Law)

Economic Forces:– Allocation of Resources, Employment, Inflation etc

Page 4: Historical Foundation Of Management

Historical Background Of Management

Organizations Have Existed for Thousands of Years– testifies to the existence of early management practice

• ability to create the Pyramids, Great Wall of China

Significant Pre-Twentieth-Century Events– Wealth of Nations - Adam Smith

• division of labor - breakdown of jobs into narrow and repetitive tasks increased productivity

– Industrial Revolution • substitution of machine power for human power• large organizations required formal management

Page 5: Historical Foundation Of Management

Development Of Major Management Theories

HistoricalBackground Scientific

ManagementGeneralAdministrativeTheorists

QuantitativeApproach

Management Theories

IndustrialRevolution

Adam Smith

Early Advocates

Hawthorne Studies

OrganizationalBehavior

Early Examplesof Management

Page 6: Historical Foundation Of Management

Management Approaches

Classical Humanistic Management Science Recent Trends

– Systems Theory– Contingency View– Total Quality Management

Page 7: Historical Foundation Of Management

First Perspective:

CLASSICAL

Page 8: Historical Foundation Of Management

Classical Perspective

Emerged during the 19th and 20th centuries Factory systems appearing in 1800’s Problems:

– Tooling the plants– Organizing managerial structure– Training employees (many immigrants)– Scheduling complex manufacturing operations– Increased labor dissatisfaction; strikes

Page 9: Historical Foundation Of Management

Classical Approaches

Scientific Management– Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915) – Henry Gantt– Frank B. and Lillian M. Gilbreth

Bureaucratic Organizations– Max Weber (1864-1920)

Administrative Principles– Henri Fayol (1841-1925)– Mary Parker Follett (1868 – 1933)– Chester I. Barnard (1886-1961)

Page 10: Historical Foundation Of Management

Scientific Management

Classical Perspective

Page 11: Historical Foundation Of Management

Frederick Taylor, Engineer Father of Scientific Management

Problem in labor productivity lies with poor

management practices, not labor.

Manner of change can be determined only by

scientific study.

Replace rules of thumb and tradition with precise

procedures developed after careful study.

Work with Bethlehem Steel plant in 1898

Page 12: Historical Foundation Of Management

Henry Gantt

Gantt Chart – a bar graph that measures planned

and completed work along each stage of

production by time elapsed.

Page 13: Historical Foundation Of Management

Frank B. Gilbreth(1868 – 1924) Pioneered time and motion study

Stressed efficiency; “one best way” to do work.

Early work with bricklayers

Greatest impact on medical surgery by drastically

reducing the time patients spent on the operating

table.

Page 14: Historical Foundation Of Management

Lillian M. Gilbreth1878-1972 Widowed in 1924 with 12 children, ages 2 – 19.

“First Lady of Management”

Pioneered in the field of industrial psychology and

made substantial contributions to human resource

management.

Page 15: Historical Foundation Of Management

Bureaucratic Organizations

Classical Perspective

Page 16: Historical Foundation Of Management

Max Weber, German Theorist Envisioned organizations managed on an impersonal,

rational basis.

An organization based on rational authority would be more

efficient and adaptable to change.

Employee selection and advancement based on

competence.

Rely on rules and written records for continuity.

Manager relies on legal power of his/her position instead

of personality.

Page 17: Historical Foundation Of Management

EXHIBIT 2.4: WEBER’S IDEAL BUREAUCRACY

2-17

Page 18: Historical Foundation Of Management

Administrative Principles

Classical Perspective

Page 19: Historical Foundation Of Management

Henri Fayol, French Engineer

General and Industrial Management

Proposed 14 general principles of management– Unity of command (one supervisor)

– Division of work (specialization)

– Unity of direction (group similar activities)

– Scalar chain (chain of authority)

Page 20: Historical Foundation Of Management

Mary Parker Follett

Trained in philosophy and political science

Stressed the importance of people rather than engineering

techniques

“Don’t Hug Your Blueprints”

Analyzed dynamics of management-organization

interactions

Addressed ethics, power and leadership

Proposed concept of empowerment

Page 21: Historical Foundation Of Management

Chester I. Barnard

Studied Economics at Harvard; no degree

President of New Jersey Bell in 1927

Proposed the concept of the informal organization

Includes cliques and naturally occurring social groupings

Acceptance theory of authority – people have free will and

can choose whether to follow management orders.

Page 22: Historical Foundation Of Management

Second Perspective:

Humanistic

Page 23: Historical Foundation Of Management

Humanistic Perspective

Human Relations Movement– Hawthorne Studies (1927-1932), Western Electric

Hawthorne Works in Chicago– CIL, Thomas Edison, Honorary Chair, 1924-1927– Elton Mayo, Harvard Business School examined

productivity and work conditions Human Resources Perspective

– Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)– Douglas McGregor (1906-1964)

Behavioral Sciences Approach

Page 24: Historical Foundation Of Management

The Hawthorne Effect

The rewards you reap when you pay attention to

people. The mere act of showing people that

you’re concerned about them usually spurs them

to better job performance.

When people spend a large portion of their time at

work, they must have a sense of belonging, of

being part of a team.

Page 25: Historical Foundation Of Management

Hawthorne Studies

1895 – struggle develops between manufacturers of gas

and electric lighting fixtures for control of the residential

and industrial market.

More light results in more productivity, they say

6 year Study Result: Money was not the cause of the

increased output. Employees’ output increased sharply

when managers treated them in a positive manner.

Page 26: Historical Foundation Of Management

The Human Relations Movement

Humanistic PerspectiveThe human relations school of thought

considers that truly effective control comes from within the individual workers rather

than from strict, authoritarian control.

Page 27: Historical Foundation Of Management

The Human Resources Perspective

Humanistic Perspective

Page 28: Historical Foundation Of Management

Abraham Maslow, Psychologist

Observed that patients’ problems stemmed from inability

to satisfy their needs.

Proposed a hierarchy of needs– Physiological needs

– Safety

– Belongingness

– Esteem

– Self-actualization

Basis for motivational techniques

Page 29: Historical Foundation Of Management

Douglas McGregor, College President

Challenged assumptions about human behavior

based on his experiences as a manager, consultant,

his training as a psychologist, and Maslow’s work.

Theory X and Theory Y

Workers are best described by Theory Y

Take advantage of the imagination and intellect of

all employees.

Page 30: Historical Foundation Of Management

Behavioral Sciences Approach

Humanistic Perspective

Page 31: Historical Foundation Of Management

Behavioral Sciences Approach

It is based on scientific methods and study.

Draws from sociology, psychology, anthropology,

economics and other disciplines to understand

employee behavior and interaction in an

organizational setting.

Impacts motivation, communication, leadership

and human resource management.

Page 32: Historical Foundation Of Management

Third Perspective:

Management Science

Page 33: Historical Foundation Of Management

Management Science Perspective

World War II created sophisticated tools for modern global

warfare.

Applies mathematics, statistics and other quantitative

techniques to management decision-making and problem-

solving.

Operations Research

Operations Management

Management Information Systems

Page 34: Historical Foundation Of Management

Fourth Perspective: Emerging Trends

Systems TheoryContingency View

Total Quality Management (Deming)

Page 35: Historical Foundation Of Management

Systems Theory

A set of interrelated parts that function as a whole to achieve a common purpose.– Inputs– Transformation process– Outputs– Feedback– Environment

Page 36: Historical Foundation Of Management

System Theory : Current Theories

System: A set of related parts that work together in order to achieve a common objective

Open System: A system that interact with external environment

Close System: A system that does not interact with environment.

Entropy: A tendency of system to run down or die

Synergy: In organization every department depends upon each other

Subsystems: Parts of system that depend upon each other.

Page 37: Historical Foundation Of Management

Contingency View

Universalist View (classical perspective) – management

concepts are universal

Case View – Each situation is unique.

Contingency View – A manager’s response depends on

identifying key variables in an organizational situation.

What works in one setting may not work in another.

Contingencies include the environment, industry,

technology and international cultures.

Page 38: Historical Foundation Of Management

Total Quality Management

Shift from inspection approach to quality control

emphasizing employee involvement in the prevention of

quality problems.

Managing the total organization to deliver quality to

customers.

Significant Elements of TQM– Employee involvement

– Focus on the customer

– Benchmarking

– Continuous improvement

Page 39: Historical Foundation Of Management

Dr. W. Edwards Deming (1900-1993)

“Father of Quality Movement”

Developed theory and methods to improve the

quality an dependability of manufactured

products.

Application of his work in Japan sparked the

Japanese Industrial Miracle-the transformation of

Japanese business

Page 40: Historical Foundation Of Management

EXHIBIT 2.9: LEARNING ORGANIZATION VERSUS TRADITIONAL ORGANIZATION

2-40

Page 41: Historical Foundation Of Management

Current Trends And Issues Learning Organizations and Knowledge Management

– Learning Organization - one that has developed the capacity to continuously learn, adapt, and change

– create learning capabilities throughout the organization• understanding that knowledge is an important resource

– Knowledge Management - involves cultivating a learning culture where organizational members systematically gather knowledge and share it with others in the organization so as to achieve better performance

– managers must transform themselves from bosses to team leaders• learn to listen, motivate, coach, and nurture

2-41

Page 42: Historical Foundation Of Management

Any Question