highway engineering design_pavement design

Upload: chiranjaya-hulangamuwa

Post on 05-Jul-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    1/78

    Dr. Wasala Bandara

    1

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    2/78

    2

    Pavement is defined as a road or highway with hard, smooth,and leveled surface made using a suitable material such as

    Portland cement concrete or asphalt concrete

    Asphalt concrete pavement Portland cement concrete pavement

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    3/78

    3

    In the west; Romans were the pioneer road makers, who use elaborate techniquesas far back as 312 B.C. They construcred the three kinds of roads as follows:

      Levelled earth roads

      Compacted gravel road

      Stone block-paved roads

    The Romens practiced the removal of all soft material under a pavementand building up the road from the hard stratum. Therefore these road hadpavement thickness varying from 0.75m to 2.5m.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    4/78

    4

    The next stage in the development of road making came in the 18th

    century whenthe French engineer Tresaguset (1716-1796) introduced the concept of crosschamber for surface water drainage.

    This method of construction consisted of preparing a convex road bed or subgrade and laying two layers of hand-packed foundation stones.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    5/78

    5

    Telford (1757-1834), the founder and first president of the Institution of CivilEngineers proposed a new method of construction in the early 19th century.

    He believed in the principle of effecting surface drainage by a cross slope aopte byTresaguest, but obtained it by laying foundation stone of varying sizes on a flatsubgrade.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    6/78

    6

    In 1827 Jhon Mc Adam, the forerunner of the modern highwayintroduced a completely different method of road constructionbased on scientific observations

    1.   The earth based or subgrade that the road is built on, ultimately carried the totalload

    2.   Any well rained compacted good soil could carry such a load. Hence subgradedrainage under a pavement is important

    3.   Structure stability of the pavement structure

    4.   Stones on the surface layer should be smaller than the width of the wheel or else loosening of the surface could occur 

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    7/78

    7

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    8/78

    8

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    9/78

    9

     Defined by users (drivers) Develop methods to relate physical attributes to driver ratings

     Result is usually a numerical scale

    From the AASHO Road

    Test (1956  – 1961)

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    10/78

    12

    Pavement

    Flexible   Rigid Composite

    Pavements are classified as “ flexible”  or “ rigid ” or “ composite” depending on how they distribute surface loads

    Constructed using

    granular material

    and bitumen

    Constructed of 

    Portland cement

    concrete (PCC)

    Base layer of PCC

    and a surface layer

    of hot-mix asphalt

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    11/78

    13

    Flexible pavements   are those which are   surfaced (i.e.,paved) with bituminous materials such as asphalt concrete

     Asphalt concrete possess a lower stiffness (EI) thanPortland cement concrete due to lower modulus of 

    elasticity of asphalt concrete as compared to Portlandcement concrete

    Due to lower stiffness of asphalt concrete the totalstructure of a flexible pavement "bends" or "deflects"under traffic loads. This is the logic behind calling such apavement as "flexible pavement”

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    12/78

    14

    Flexible pavements distribute the wheel load over a cone-shaped area under the wheel, reducing the imposed unitstresses as depth increases

    Load distribution under a

    flexible pavement

    Stress at lower depth is

    higher than the stress

    at higher depth

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    13/78

    15

    Rigid pavements are those which are surfaced (i.e., paved)with Portland cement concrete

    Portland cement concrete possess a substantially higher 

    stiffness (EI) than asphalt concrete due to higher modulus of elasticity of Portland cement concrete as

    compared to asphalt concrete

    Due to high stiffness of Portland cement concrete the

    total structure of a rigid pavement "bends" or "deflects"very little  under traffic loads. This is the logic behind

    calling such a pavement as  “rigid pavement”

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    14/78

    16

    Rigid pavements act as flexural members and distribute the

    wheel load fairly uniformly over the area under the pavement

    slab

    Load distribution under 

    a rigid pavement

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    15/78

    17

    Structure   Surface course

      Base course

      Subbase course

      Subgrade

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    16/78

    18

    Subgrade: Prepared roadbed consisting of natural or 

    imported soil Subbase course: This is the layer (or layers) under the

    base layer. A subbase is not always needed andtherefore may often be omitted .

    Base course: This is the layer directly below the

    Portland cement concrete layer and generally consistsof aggregate or stabilized subgrade.

    Surface course: This is the top layer and the layer thatcomes in contact with traffic. It consists of the

    Portland cement concrete slab

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    17/78

    19

    Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP)

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    18/78

    20

    Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP)

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    19/78

    21

    Slip form

    Fixed form

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    20/78

    22

    Structure   Surface (Wearing) course

      Base course

      Road-base course

      Sub-base course

      Subgrade

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    21/78

    23

    Subgrade: Prepared roadbed consisting of natural or importedsoil

    Sub-base course: A layer between the subgrade and the road-base course, made from materials superior to that of subgrade.

    In case of a good quality of subgrade, the subbase course isomitted.

    Road-base course: A layer between the sub-base and the basecourse

    Base course:   This is the layer directly below the asphaltconcrete layer and generally consists of aggregate (either stabilized or unstabilized).

    Surface course: This is the top layer and the layer that comesin contact with traffic. It may be composed of one or severaldifferent asphalt concrete sub layers

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    22/78

    24

    Dense-graded

    Open-graded Gap-graded

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    23/78

    25

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    24/78

    26

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    25/78

    27

    The functions of the different layers of flexible pavement are as follows

    1. Wearing coursea) Withstands direct traffic loading.

    b) Provides smooth riding

    c) Provides skid resistant surface

    d) Waterproofs the pavement

    2. Base-course(a) Supports wearing course

    (b) Assists protecting layers below

    3. Road-base(a) Main load spreading layer of the pavement structure

    4. Sub-basea) Assists load spreading

    b) Assists subsoil drainagec) Acts as temporary road for construction traffic

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    26/78

    28

    Granular sub-base, called Type 1 Graded Granular sub-base, called Type 2

    (Crushed rock; slag; or other hard material such as smaller size materialother than what specified in Type 1. Therefore, natural sands and gravels.)

    Type 1 is stronger 

    It has good part ic le distr ibut ion and hence good

    interlock ing qual ity 

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    27/78

    29

    Sieve sizePercentage passing

    Type 1 Type 2

    75 mm 100 100

    37.5 mm 85-100 85-100

    10 mm 40-70 45-1005 mm 25-45 25-85

    600 μm 8-22 8-45

    78 μm 0-10 0-10

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    28/78

    30

    Upper Sub-baseLower Sub-base( Capping layer or

    Selected Subgrade)

    Flex ib le Rig id Flex ib le  

    Soil Type   Type I & II Type I & II

    Liquid Limit (LL)  Not to exceed

    40%

    Not to exceed

    25%

      Not to exceed 40%

    Plasticity Index (PI)  Not to exceed

    15%

    Not to exceed

    6%  Not to exceed 15%

    Maximum Dry Density   Not less than 1,750 kg/m3 Not less than 1,650 kg/m3

    4-days soaking CBR at

    98% MDD  Not less than 30% Not less than 15%

    Layers thickness Not exceed 225 mmCompaction using 8-10 tonne smooth wheel roller

    Optimum moisture content 2 %

    Degree of Compaction 98% 95%

    Standard Specification for Construction and Maintenance of Roads and Bridges (ICTAD- SCA/5)

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    29/78

    31

    Wet mix macadamCrushed rock graded and mixed with 2-6% water. Laid in 200 mm layers andcompacted or rolled

    Dry bound macadam

    37.5 mm to 50.0 mm single size crushed rock laid in 75-100 mm thicklayers and rolled

     A 25mm thick 4.7mm down crushed rock layer is laid on top and vibratedinto the course layer 

    Repeat until no more smaller material can be worked in. Excess finesremoved and additional course layers are laid to build the requiredthickness of road-base

    Dense bituminous macadam

    Crushed rock (fines

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    30/78

    32

    Rolled asphaltWell graded crushed rock (35% fine aggregate and 65% coarseaggregate) plant mixed with 50  – 70 % pen grade bitumen

    Lean concrete

    Cement bound road-base

    Soil cement and cement bound granular road base.Mixtures of soil or granular material and cement, laidfull depth in one layer and rolled.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    31/78

    33

    Single sized aggregate

    base

    Water bound &

    Dry bound

    macadam

    bases

    Dense graded

    aggregate basesPenetration Macadam bases Bitumen bound bases

    Material Broken or crushed stonenominal single size 50mm

    or 37.5mm and 20mm or

    14mm respectively

    Broken or crushed

    stone nominal

    single size 50mm

    or 63mm and

    crusher fines

    Shall be graded

    crushed rock nominal

    single size 37.5mm or

    28mm or 20mm

     Coarse aggregate shall be

    50mm or 37.5 mm and key

    aggregate shall be 20mm or

    14mm

     Bituminous binder shall be

    80-100 penetration grade

    bitumen or 10-20 % cutback

    bitumen or MC 800 or

    MC3000 cutback bitumen or

    bitumen emulsion CRS-2

     Coarse aggregate shall

    be 37.5 mm or 20mm

    and fine aggregate shall

    conform to general

    requirements

     Binder shall be 60-70

    penetration grade

    bitumen

    Thickness of

    base course

    (compacted)

     75mm-50mm aggregate

    & 20mm choker stone

     55mm- 37.5 mm

    aggregate & 14mmchoker stone

     150mm- 100mm

    aggregate, 50mm

    aggregate & 20mm

    choker stone

     130mm- 100mm

    aggregate, 37.5mm

    aggregate & 14mm

    choker stone

    Not less than

    75mm and shall

    not normally

    exceed 200mm

    Not less than 75mm

    and shall not normally

    exceed 200mm

     75 mm- 50mm aggregate

     55mm- 37.5mm aggregate

    Max 100mm

    Min 60mm

    Compactionusing

    8-10 tonne steel wheelroller or approved vibratory

    rollers

    8-10 tonne steelwheel roller or

    approved vibratory

    rollers

    8-10 tonne steel wheelroller or approved

    vibratory rollers

    8-10 tonne smooth wheel roller 

    Optimum

    moisture content2% 2% 2%

    Degree of

    CompactionNot less than 98% Not less than 98% Not less than 98% 92%

    Standard Specification for Construction and Maintenance of Roads and Bridges (ICTAD- SCA/5)

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    32/78

    34

    Base-course Open textured macadam

    Coarse graded, no fines

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    33/78

    35

    Wearing course Bituminous surface dressing and a layer of  

    chippings

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    34/78

    36

    Wearing course Hot rolled asphalt

    The Strongest and durable.

    Made of high fines

    Laid 40 mm thick with 20 mm coated chippings rolled into the surface

    for better skid resistance.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    35/78

    37

      The strength of the sub-grade - California Bearing Ratio(CBR) is one measure of sub-grade strength

      The number of wheel load applications on the

    pavement during the design life

      An empirical relationship, layer thicknesses havewith CBR value of sub-grade and number of wheel

    load applications

      Locally available materials for construction

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    36/78

    38

      CBR is a measure of  resistance of material topenetration of a plunger under controlled density and

    moisture conditions

      Most universally acceptedpavement design methods

      A standard penetration-type load-deformation test iscarried out, and using the values obtained from thetest from an empirical design chart, the pavementthickness are calculated

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    37/78

    39

    Apparatus

    Cylindrical mould

    ventilated oven - Thermostatically

    controlled to maintain a temperatureof 105 ± 5 °C.

    A balance

    Test sieves

    Loading machine

    5000kg (rate

    1.25mm/min)Filter paper 

    Spacer Disc

    Surcharge weight

    Rammers

    Detachable base plate

    Slotted weight

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    38/78

    40

    Procedure   The specimen is mixed with enough water to dampen it

    to achieve the required laboratory moisture ratio. It is

    then left to cure for as long as it takes for the water to be

    thoroughly mixed into and uniformly distributed

      Compact into mould using modified compaction

      Load is applied on the sample by a standard plunger 

    at the rate of 1 ± 0.2 mm/min

    Dynamic compaction

    L igh t Comp. Heavy Comp.

    No. of layers 3 5

    Rammer weight 2.6 kg 4.89 kg

    Fall 31 cm 45 cm

    Blows/layer 56 56

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    39/78

    41

    Results

      Plot the load penetration curve

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    40/78

    42

     

      

     

     y

     xCBR   100

    Results

    x = material resistance or the unit load on

    the piston (pressure) for 2.5 mm or 5

    mm of penetration

    y = standard unit load (pressure) for well

    graded crushed stone.For 2.5 mm of penetration = 13.2 kN

    For 5.0 mm of penetration = 19.5 kN

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    41/78

    43

    Results

      Read the force value in N at penetrations of 2.5mm and

    5.0mm and calculate the bearing ratio for each by

    dividing by 13.2kN and 19.5kN respectively, then

    multiplying by 100

      The greatest value calculated for penetrations at 2.5mm

    and 5.0mm will be recorded as the CBR

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    42/78

    44

    2.5

    5.0

    New origin

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    43/78

    45

    California Bearing

    Ratio Equipment

    California Bearing Ratio Vs

    Moisture content

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    44/78

    46

    General Soil Type USC Soil Type CBR Range

    Clean gravelsGW 40  – 80

    GP 30  – 60

    Gravels with finesGM 20  – 60

    GC 20  – 40

    Clean sandsSW 20  – 40

    SP 10  – 40

    Sands with finesSM 10  – 40

    SC 5  – 20

    Silts and clays

    ML 15 or lessCL 15 or less

    OL 5 or less

    MH 10 or less

    CH (LL>50%) 15 or less

    OH 5 or less

    USC-Unified Soil Classification

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    45/78

    47

    The flow chart leading to the design

    of flexible pavement using steps

    discussed in road note 31

    Overseas Road Note 31

    “A   guide to the structural design of 

    bitumen-surfaced roads in tropical and

    sub tropical   countries”   published by

    Transport Research Laboratory (TRL),

    United Kingdom   gives a simple but

    adequate design procedure for most

    Sri Lankan roads

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    46/78

    48

    Several typical methods

      CBR Method

      Asphalt Institute method

      California Method

      AASHTO Method

      Mechanistic design Method

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    47/78

    KEY TO STRUCTUREAL CATALOGUE 

    Traffic Classes Sub-grade strength classes

    Traffic class 106 esa Range Sub-grade strength class Range of CBR %

    T1 < 0.3 S1 2

    T2 0.3 - 0.7 S2 3  – 4

    T3 0.7 - 1.5 S3 5 -7

    T4 1.5 - 3.0 S4 8  – 14

    T5 3.0  – 6.0 S5 15  – 29

    T6 6.0  – 10 S6 30 +

    T7 10  – 17

    T8 17 - 30 49

    In this method, the CBR values are used to determine the

    total thickness of the flexible pavement and its various layers

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    48/78

    50

    Wheel load applicationsThe required data for pavement design

      CBR value

      The number of times wheel loads are applied to the pavement

    This is based on the design life, the anticipated number of differenttypes of vehicles using the pavement during the design life and theequ ivalen t fac to rs (EF)  for each vehicle type which converts anaxle loading to a standard axle loading

    .

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    49/78

    0.0007  0.10 

    1.35  1.85 

    5.11 

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Car Delivery Truck Loaded 18-Wheeler 

    Loaded 40' Bus Loaded 60'Articulated Bus

       E   F

      p  e  r   V  e   h   i  c   l  e

    51

    =  

    .

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    50/78

    52

    Equivalent standard axles (esa)   Base year traffic flow is the   Annual Average Daily Traffic

    (AADT) of the base year 

      The number of vehicles is converted into equivalent standardaxles (esa)

      = × ×

    Use growth factor (r) for each vehicle class and the assigned designlife (n years) to calculate cumulative esa

     =  × +   −

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    51/78

    53

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    52/78

    54

    Directional factor (f D)

    Directional Distribution Directional factor f D

    50/50 1.00

    60/40 0.94

    70/30 0.89

    80/20 0.83

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    53/78

    55

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    54/78

    KEY TO STRUCTUREAL CATALOGUE 

    Traffic Classes Sub-grade strength classes

    Traffic class 106 esa Range Sub-grade strength class Range of CBR %

    T1 < 0.3 S1 2

    T2 0.3 - 0.7 S2 3  – 4

    T3 0.7 - 1.5 S3 5 -7

    T4 1.5 - 3.0 S4 8  – 14

    T5 3.0  – 6.0 S5 15  – 29

    T6 6.0  – 10 S6 30 +T7 10  – 17

    T8 17 - 30

    56

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    55/78

    57

    According to road note 31Shows the flow chart leading to the design of flexible using stepsdiscussed in road note 31

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    56/78

    58

    T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7

    S1

    S2

    S3

    S4

    S5

    S6

    150

    SD

    175

    300

    150

    SD

    225*

    300

    200

    SD

    200

    300

    200

    SD

    250*

    300

    200

    SD

    300

    300*

    225

    SD

    300

    325*

    150

    SD

    150

    200

    150

    SD

    200

    200

    200

    SD

    175

    200

    200

    SD

    225*

    200

    200

    SD

    275*

    200

    225

    SD

    300*

    200

    SD

    150

    200

    SD

    150

    250

    SD

    200

    225

    SD

    200

    275*

    SD

    200

    325*

    SD

    225

    350*

    SD

    150

    125

    SD

    225

    275

    SD

    150

    175

    SD

    200

    150

    SD

    200

    200

    SD

    200

    250

    SD

    250

    175

    SD

    150

    100

    SD

    150

    100

    SD

    175

    100

    SD

    200

    125

    SD

    225

    150

    SD

    250SD

    150

    SD

    150

    SD

    175

    SD

    200

    SD

    225

    GRANULAR ROADBASE /

    SURFACE DRESSING

    Notes 

    1. Up to 100mm of sub-base

    may be substituted with

    selected fill provided the sub-

    base is not reduced to les

    than the road-base thickness

    or 200mm whichever is the

    greater. The substitution ratio

    of sub-base to selected fill is25mm-32mm.

    2. A cement or lime stabilized

    sub-base may also be used.

    shows the legend of description of pavement materials necessary to refer 

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    57/78

    59

    COMPOSITE ROADBASE

    (UNBOUND AND CEMENTED)

     / SURFACE DRESSING

    Notes 

    1. Sub-base to fill substitution

    not permitted.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    58/78

    60

    GRANULAR ROADBASE /

    SEMI-STRUCTURAL

    SURFACE

    Notes 

    1. * Up to 100mm of sub-base

    may be substituted with

    selected fill provided the sub-

    base is not reduced to les

    than the road-base thickness

    or 200mm whichever is the

    greater. The substitution ratio

    of sub-base to selected fill is25mm-32mm.

    2. A cement or lime stabilized

    sub-base may also be used.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    59/78

    61

    COMPOSITE ROADBASE /SEMI-STRUCTURAL

    SURFACE

    Notes

    1. Sub-base to fill substitution

    not permitted

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    60/78

    62

    GRANULAR ROADBASE /STRUCTURAL SURFACE

    Notes

    1. * Up to 100mm of sub-base

    may be substituted with

    selected fill provided the sub-

    base is not reduced to les

    than the road-base thickness

    or 200mm whichever is the

    greater. The substitution ratio

    of sub-base to selected fill is25mm-32mm.

    2. A cement or lime stabilized

    sub-base may also be used.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    61/78

    63

    COMPOSITE ROADBASE /STRUCTURAL SURFACE

    Notes

    1. Sub-base to fill substitution

    not permitted.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    62/78

    64

    BITUMINOUS ROADBASE /SEMI-STRUCTURAL

    SURFACE

    Notes

    1. * Up to 100mm of sub-base

    may be substituted with

    selected fill provided the sub-

    base is not reduced to less

    than the road-base thickness

    or 200mm whichever is the

    greater. The substitution ratio

    of sub-base to selected fill is25mm-32mm.

    2. A cement or lime stabilized

    sub-base may also be used.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    63/78

    65

    BITUMINOUS ROADBASE /SEMI-STRUCTURAL

    SURFACE

    Notes

    1. A granular sub-base may

    also be used.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    64/78

    66

    Road note 31

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    65/78

    67

    Road note 31

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    66/78

    68

    Road note 31

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    67/78

    69

    Road note 31

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    68/78

    70

    Road note 31

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    69/78

    71

    Example: Design a flexible for the AADT values given in the table and a soil with CBR 6.5.

    Step1:Base Year Equivalent Standard Axles (   )

    Axle load of

    vehicle class (KN)

    AADT of vehicle

    class

    Equivalent Factor

    (EF)

    3.0 450 0.01 16434.0 380 0.04 5548

    5.0 250 0.11 10038

    6.0 100 0.25 9125

    7.0 85 0.50 15513

    8.0 75 0.91 24911

    9.0 40 1.55 2263010.0 35 2.50 31938

    11.0 25 3.83 34949

    12.0 15 5.67 31043

      = × ×

    .

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    70/78

    72

    Step2: Calculation of cumulative esa

    Axle load of

    vehicle classBase year esa

    Growth

    Factor 

    (%)

    Design

    life (n

    years)

    Cumulative esa

    ()

    3.0 1643 4 10 197264.0 5548 3 10 63602

    5.0 10038 3 10 115074

    6.0 9125 4 10 109556

    7.0 15513 5 10 195121

    8.0 24911 5 10 3133289.0 22630 3 10 259428

    10.0 31938 4 10 383451

    11.0 34949 4 10 419601

    12.0 31043 5 10 390456

    Total 2269343

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    71/78

    73

    Step 3: Find the traffic & sub grade strength class1. The traffic class is T4

    2. Sub grade strength class is S3

    Step 4: Refer the charts:

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    72/78

    74

    GRANULAR ROADBASE /SEMI-STRUCTURAL

    SURFACE

    Notes 

    1. * Up to 100mm of sub-base

    may be substituted with

    selected fill provided the sub-

    base is not reduced to les

    than the road-base thickness

    or 200mm whichever is the

    greater. The substitution ratio

    of sub-base to selected fill is

    25mm-32mm.

    2. A cement or lime stabilized

    sub-base may also be used.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    73/78

    75

    COMPOSITE ROADBASE /SEMI-STRUCTURAL

    SURFACE

    Notes

    1. Sub-base to fill substitution

    not permitted

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    74/78

    76

    BITUMINOUS ROADBASE /SEMI-STRUCTURAL

    SURFACE

    Notes

    1. * Up to 100mm of sub-base

    may be substituted with

    selected fill provided the sub-

    base is not reduced to less

    than the road-base thickness

    or 200mm whichever is the

    greater. The substitution ratio

    of sub-base to selected fill is

    25mm-32mm.

    2. A cement or lime stabilized

    sub-base may also be used.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    75/78

    77

    Notes

    1. * Up to 100mm of sub-base may be substituted with selected fill provided the sub-base is not reduced to less

    than the road-base thickness or 200mm whichever is the greater. The substitution ratio of sub-base to selected

    fill is 25mm-32mm.

    2. A cement or lime stabilized sub-base may also be used.

    Type Structure

    Granular road-base /

    semi-structural surfaceNotes 

    Composite road-base/ semi-structural

    surface

    Bituminous road-base

    / semi-structural

    surfaceNotes 

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    76/78

    78

    Road base thickness = 175 mmMinimum Sub base thickness = 175 mm or 200mm whichever is the grater = 200 mm

    Substituted layer thickness ( capping layer)

    = 325mm  – 200 mm

    = 125 mm (but maximum capping layer thickness is 100mm)

    = 100 mm

    New sub base thickness =325 mm  – 100 mm = 225 mm

     Actual thickness of capping layer 

    = 100/25 X 32 (The substitution ratio of sub-base to selected

    fill is 25mm-32mm)

    = 128 mm

    How to do the economical design

    Notes

    1. * Up to 100mm of sub-base may be substituted with selected fill provided the

    sub-base is not reduced to less than the road-base thickness or 200mm

    whichever is the greater. The substitution ratio of sub-base to selected fill is

    25mm-32mm.

    2. A cement or lime stabilized sub-base may also be used.

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    77/78

    79

    The section of economical design

    225

    128

    Normal design Economical design

  • 8/16/2019 Highway Engineering Design_Pavement Design

    78/78

    Upper Sub-baseLower Sub-base

    ( Capping layer or Selected

    Subgrade)

    Liquid Limit (LL)   Not to exceed 40% Not to exceed 40%

    Plasticity Index (PI)   Not to exceed 15% Not to exceed 15%

    Maximum Dry Density

      Not less than 1,750

    kg/m3   Not less than 1,650 kg/m3

    4-days soaking CBR at 98%

    MDD  Not less than 30% Not less than 15%

    Layers thickness Not exceed 225 mm

    Compaction using 8-10 tonne smooth wheel roller

    Optimum moisture content 2 %

    Degree of Compaction 98% 95%

    Standard Specification for Construction and Maintenance of Roads and Bridges (ICTAD- SCA/5)