Highlight the correct response. Frostburg State University 121800 Spring 2017

Praxis I or its accepted equivalent passing score Undergraduatefor entrance into unit

Praxis I or its accepted equivalent passing scoreUndergraduatefor entrance into internship

Praxis I or its accepted equivalent passing score UndergraduateAs exit requirement for program completion

Praxis I or its accepted equivalent passing score Undergraduateas graduation requirement

X

Praxis I or its accepted equivalent passing scoreGraduatefor entrance into unit

Praxis I or its accepted equivalent passing score Graduatefor entrance into internship

Praxis I or its accepted equivalent passing score GraduateAs exit requirement for program completion

Praxis I or its accepted equivalent passing score Graduateas graduation requirement

X

Praxis II or ACTFL or its accepted equivalent passing scoreUndergraduatefor entrance into unit

Praxis II or ACTFL or its accepted equivalent passing score Undergraduatefor entrance into internship

Praxis II or ACTFL or its accepted equivalent passing score UndergraduateAs exit requirement for program completion

Praxis II or ACTFL or its accepted equivalent passing score Undergraduateas graduation requirement

Praxis II or ACTFL or its accepted equivalent passing scoreGraduatefor entrance into unit

Praxis II or ACTFL or its accepted equivalent passing score Graduatefor entrance into internship

Praxis II or ACTFL or its accepted equivalent passing score GraduateAs exit requirement for program completion

Praxis II or ACTFL or its accepted equivalent passing score Graduateas graduation requirement

Praxis II Pedagogy passing scoreUndergraduatefor entrance into unit

Praxis II Pedagogy passing scoreUndergraduate for entrance into internship

Praxis II Pedagory passing scoreUndergraduateAs exit requirement for program completion

Praxis II Pedagogy passing scoreUndergraduateas graduation requirement

Praxis II Pedagogy passing scoreGraduatefor entrance into unit

Praxis II Pedagogy passing scoreGraduate for entrance into internship

Praxis II Pedagory passing scoreGraduateAs exit requirement for program completion

Praxis II Pedagogy passing scoreGraduateas graduation requirement

Institutional and Unit Demographic Information 2016/2017Race/Ethnicity Institution (Full time) Unit (Full time) Unit (Adjunct) Male Total Female TotalEthnicityHispanic/Latino of any race 5 1 1RaceAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeAsian 10Black or African American 20 1 2 1 2Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific IslanderWhite 214 25 30 13 42Two or More racesUnknown 10

2016/2017 Teacher Candidates participating in 100 day internship (Current)Race/Ethnicity Undergraduate Year-long interns Graduate either,in PDS or not in PD Male Total Female TotalEthnicity Hispanic/Latino of any race 6 1 5RaceAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeAsian 1 1Black or African American 17 2 15Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific IslanderWhite 68 20 13 75Two or More races 2 1 3Declined to Report 2 1 3Total 96 22 16 102

2017-2018 Teacher Candidates participating in 100 day internship (Projected)

Race/Ethnicity Undergraduate Year - long Interns

Graduate either,in PDS or not in PDS Male Total Female Total

EthnicityHispanic/Latino of any race 7 1 6RaceAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeAsian 2 2Black or African American 18 2 16Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific IslanderWhite 70 22 15 77Two or More races 4 3 7Declined to Report 2 2 4Total 103 27 18 112

Certification Eligible (Praxis II Qualifying Scores) # of Actual Completers Hispanic or Latino of Any Race Hispanic or Latino of Any Race Asian Asian Black or African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska Native merican Indian or Alaska Nati tive Hawaiian or Pacific Isla waiian or Pac White White wo or More Rac Two or More Races Unknown Unknown Projected Completers 2016/2017 Projected Completers 2017/2018Note: this number may not match Title II reporting 2015/2016 Female Male Fem Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Early Childhood Education (PreK-3) 45 1 1 39 4 45 47Elementary Education (1-6) 36 2 1 23 7 2 1 36 38Middle School (4-9) See line 170-173 for detailed response box 6 5 1 6 10Agriculture (7-12)Biology (7-12) 1 1Business Education (7-12)Chemistry (7-12) 1 1Earth/Space Science (7-12)English 2 1 1 2 2Family and Consumer Sciences (7-12)Geography (7-12)History (7-12)Marketing (7-12)Mathematics (7-12) 4 2 2 4 6Physical Science (7-12)Physics (7-12)Professional and Technical Education (7-12)Social Studies (7-12) 10 1 5 4 8 8Speech Communication (7-12)Theater (7-12)Art (PreK-12) 1 1Dance (PreK-12)Environmental Education (PreK-12)Health (PreK - 12)Music (PreK -12) 2 1 1 2 2Physical Education (PreK - 12) 6 1 4 1 6 6World Languages PreK - 12: (French) World Languages PreK - 12: (German) World Languages PreK - 12: (Latin) World Languages PreK - 12: (Spanish) World Languages PreK - 12: (Chinese Mandarin) World Languages PreK - 12: (Arabic) World Languages PreK - 12: (Russian) World Languages PreK - 12: (Italian) World Languages PreK - 12: (Japanese) English for Speakers of other languages (ESOL) PreK-12Special Education (Birth - Grade 3)Special Education Elementary/Middle (1-8)Special Education Secondary/Adult (6-12)

Total 114 109 119

Dual Certifications # of Dual Completers Hispanic or Latino of Any Race Hispanic or Latino of Any Race Asian Asian Black or African American Black or African American American Indian or Alaska NativeAmerican Indian or Alaska Nati tive Hawaiian or Pacific Isla waiian or Pac White White wo or More Rac Two or More Races Unknown Unknown Projected Count 2016-2017 Projected Count 2017-2018One certification from 70 through 108 and one from 113 through 151 2015/2016 Female Male Fem Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Early Childhood Education (PreK-3)Elementary Education (1-6)Middle School (4-9)Agriculture (7-12)Biology (7-12)Business Education (7-12)Chemistry (7-12)Earth/Space Science (7-12)English (7-12)Family and Consumer Sciences (7-12)Geography (7-12)History (7-12)Marketing (7-12)Mathematics (7-12)Physical Science (7-12)Physics (7-12)Professional and Technical Education (7-12)Social Studies (7-12)Speech Communication (7-12)Theater (7-12)Art (PreK-12)Dance (PreK-12)Environmental Education (PreK-12)Health (PreK - 12) 6Music (PreK -12)Physical Education (PreK - 12)World Languages PreK - 12: (French) World Languages PreK - 12: (German) World Languages PreK - 12: (Latin) World Languages PreK - 12: (Spanish) World Languages PreK - 12: (Chinese Mandarin) World Languages PreK - 12: (Arabic) World Languages PreK - 12: (Russian) World Languages PreK - 12: (Italian) World Languages PreK - 12: (Japanese) English for Speakers of other languages (ESOL) PreK-12Special Education (Birth - Grade 3)Special Education Elementary/Middle (1-8)Special Education Secondary/Adult (6-12)

Total

Non-Classroom Professionals 2015/2016 2016-2017 Projected 2017-2018 Projected Guidance Counselor 6 7 8 Library/Media SpecialistPrincipal 11 12 13 Reading Specialist 10 11 12 School PsychologistSpeech/language pathologist

2015/2016Total # of required candidates placed in PDSTotal # of all candidates placed in PDS 150Total # of schools in which candidates are placed 57

Middle Schools Content Areas 2015-2016 Projected 2016-2017 Projected 2017-2018EnglishMathScience 5 2 4

PRAXIS II Pedagogy Graduate

PRAXIS I Undergraduate

PRAXIS I Graduate

PRAXIS II or ACTFL Undergraduate

PRAXIS II or ACTFL Graduate

PRAXIS II Pedagogy Undergraduate

IHE IHE PDS Coordinator PDS Coodinator Emai Telephone County LSS Liaison LSS Liaison Email School telephone IHE Liaison IHE Liaison Email Principal Principal Email Site Coordinator Site Coordinator Email School Type: E, M, H Inception Strategic Planning Held PDS Developmental Leve # interns 2016-2017 Title I or H Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Beall Elementary School 301-689-3636 Karen Goetchius kgoetschius@frostburg edu Robert Stevenson robert.stevenson@acpsmd.org Janice Lewis janice.lewis@acpsmd.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-6,S12 Title 1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Bel Air Elementary School 301-729-2992 Bob McKenzie rcmckenzie@frostburg.edu Autumn Eirich autumn.eirich@acpsmd.org Tami Deneen tami.deneen@acpsmd.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-6,S-13Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Cash Valley Elementary School 301-724-6632 Sue Raines ssraines@frostburg.edu Jackie Enright jacqueline.enright@acpsmd.org Becky Murphy rebecca.murphy@acpsmd.org Elementary School 2005 Yes At Standard F-6,S-8 Title 1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Cresaptown Elementary School 301-729-0212 Barbara Moffatt bmoffatt@frostburg.edu Scott Llewellyn scott.llewellyn@acpsmd.org Karen Sue Irons karen.irons@acpsmd.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-5,S-3Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org George's Creek Elementary School 301-463-6202 Barbara Moffatt bmoffatt@frostburg.edu Tara Fazenbaker tara.fazenbaker@acpsmd.org Dana Reinhardt dana.reinhardt@acpsmd.org Elementary School 2011 Yes Developing F-7,S-10 Title 1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org John Humbird Elementary School 301-724-8842 Ann Burkey eaburkey@frostburg.edu Heather Morganheather heather.morgan@acpsmd.org Susan Howard susan.howard@acps.md.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-5,S-4 Title 1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Mount Savage Elementary/Middle 301-263-3220 Sue Raines ssraines@frostburg.edu Marty Crump Martin.Crump@acps.k12.md.us Helen Keller helen.keller@acpsmd.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-8,S-13Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Northeast Elementary School 301-724-3285 Paticia Mace-Leonard gmleonard@frostburg.edu Dan Clark daniel.clark@acps.k12.md.us Rachael McGann rachael.mcgann@acpsmd.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-4,S-3 Title 1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org South Penn Elementary School 301-777-1755 Bob McKenzie rcmckenzie@frostburg.edu Scott Sisler scott.sisler@acps.k12.md.us Peggy Garver peggy.garver@acpsmd.org Elementary School 2003 Yes At Standard F-4,S-7 Title 1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Braddock Middle School 301-689-1255 Jodi Nichols jlnichols@frostburg.edu Danny Carter danny.carter@acps.k12.md.us Patrick Kidwell patrick.kidwell@acpsmd.org Middle School 2011 Yes Developing F-3,S-7Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Washington Middle School 301-777-5360 Jodi Nichols jlnichols@frostburg.edu Kendra Kenney kendra.kenney@acps.k12.md.us Trina McGregor trina mcgregor@acpsmd.org Middle School 2008 Yes Developing F-5,S-6Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Allegany High School 301-759-2534 Robert Whetzel alcodan@hotmail Michael Calhoun michael.calhoun@acps.k12.md.us Kay Sheehe, Lori Brown kay.sheehe@acpsmd.org High School 2009 Yes At Standard F-3,S-3Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Fort Hill High School 301-777-2570 Mary Jane O'Rourke mjorourke@frostburg.edu Joseph Carter joseph.carter@acpsmd.us Brian McKinley brian.mckinley@acpsmd.org High School 2008 Yes Developing F-2,S-2Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Allegany George Brown george.brown@acpsmd.org Mountain Ridge High School 301-689-3377 Robert Whetzel alcodan@hotmail Gene Morgan raymond.morgan@frostburg Ryan Patterson ryan.patterson@acpsmd.org High School 2008 Yes Developing F-1,S-4Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Frederick Linda Civetti;Larkin Hohnke;Sherry Collette linda.civetti@fcps.org Middletown Primary School 240-566-0200 Suzanne O'Toole sotoole@frostburg.edu Karen Hopson karen.hopson@fcps.org Colleen Dunn colleen.dunn@fcps.org Early Childhood Center 2006 Yes At Standard F-4,S-4Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Frederick Linda Civetti;Larkin Hohnke;Sherry Collette linda.civetti@fcps.org Middletown Elementary School 240-236-1100 Suzanne O'Toole sotoole@frostburg.edu Randy Perrell randy.perrell@fcps.org Coralynn.Streett coralyn.streett@fcps.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-0,S-0Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Frederick Linda Civetti;Larkin Hohnke;Sherry Collette linda.civetti@fcps.org Myersville Elementary School 240-236-1900 Suzanne O'Toole sotoole@frostburg.edu Kathy Swire kathy.swire@fcps.org Karla Parrell karla.perrell@fcps.org Elementary School 2010 Yes At Standard F-3,S-0Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Frederick Linda Civetti;Larkin Hohnke;Sherry Collette linda.civetti@fcps.org Wolfsville Elementary School 240-236-2250 Suzanne O'Toole sotoole@frostburg.edu Susan Kreiger susan.kreiger@fcps.org Janet Dill janet.dill@fcps.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-0,S-1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Frederick Linda Civetti;Larkin Hohnke;Sherry Collette linda.civetti@fcps.org Middletown Middle School 240-236-4200 Suzanne O'Toole sotoole@frostburg.edu Everrett Warren everrett.warren@fcps.org Joshua Work joshua.work@fcps.org Middle School 2003 Yes Beginning F-2,S-0Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Frederick Linda Civetti;Larkin Hohnke;Sherry Collette linda.civetti@fcps.org Middletown High School 240-236-7400 Suzanne O'Toole sotoole@frostburg.edu Lee Jeffrey lee.jeffrey@fcps.org Alisa.Gibson alisa.gibson@fcps.org High School 2003 Yes Beginning F-0,S-1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Garrett Jane Wildeson jane.wildeson@garrettcountyschools Grantsville Elementary School 301-895-5173 Jennifer Rankin jerankin@frostburg.edu Nicole Miller nicole.miller@garrettcountyschools.org Kim Collins kim.collins@garrettcountyschools.org Elementary School 2000 Yes At Standard F-2,S-2Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Garrett Jane Wildeson jane.wildeson@garrettcountyschools Route 40 Elementary 301-689-6132 Jennifer Rankin jerankin@frostburg.edu Candy Maust candy maust@garrettcountyschools org Debrah Nicklin debrah nicklin@garrettcountyschools o Elementary School 2012 Yes Developing F-1,S-2Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Mineral Cou Kelli Wilson; Susie Ray kwilson@access.k12.wv.us; sray@access.k12.wv.us Ft. Ashby Primary School 304-298-3632 Emily Milleson ekmilleson@frostburg edu Dawn Burke dbutkr@access.k12.wv.us Liz Finan liz.finan@access.k12wv.us Elementary School 2009 Yes At Standard F-0,S-0Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Mineral Cou Kelli Wilson; Susie Ray kwilson@access.k12.wv.us; sray@access.k12.wv. Frankfort Middle School 304-726-4339 Emily Milleson ekmilleson@frostburg.edu Patricia Twigg ptwigg@access.k12.wv.us Susan Stone susan.stone@access.k12.wv.us Middle School 2000 Yes Developing F-3,S-12Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Myersdale A Tim Kretchman tkretchman@masd.net Meyersdale Elementary/Middle Scho 814-634-8313 Jodi Nichols jlnichols@frostburg.edu Jackie Baer jbaer@masd.net Kathleen Emert kathy.emert@masd.net Elementary School 2000 Yes Developing F-2,S-2Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jamie Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Paramount Elementary 301-766-8289 Lynnea Richards lrichards@frostburg.edu Erin Wolford wolfoeri@wcps.k12.md.us Joan Barr barrjoa@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2006 Yes At Standard F-2,S-2Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jamie Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Lincolnshire Elementary 301-766-8206 Kris McGee KMcGee@frostburg.edu Jaime Hade hadejam@wcps.k12.md.us Grantham-Medley grantrac@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2012 Yes Beginning F-2,S-2 Title 1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jamie Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Pangborn Elementary School 301-766-8282 Kris McGee KMcGee@frostburg.edu Eric Meredith merederi@wcps.k12.md.us Jill Waters waterjill@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2011 Yes Developing F-0,S-0 Title 1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jamie Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Rockland Woods Elementary School 301-766-8206 Yvonne Belt v.belt@frostburg.edu Hope Fuss fusshop@wcps.k12.md.us Casey Dawson doggecas@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2008 Yes Developing F-2,S-2Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jamie Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us E. Russell Hicks Middle School 301-766-8110 Yvonne Belt v.belt@frostburg.edu Deron Crawford crawfder@wcboe.k12.md.us Kristen Dolan dolankri@wcps.k12.md.us Middle School 2006 Yes Developing F-0.S-0Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jamie Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us South Hagerstown High School 301-766-8485 Evelyn Williams ecwilliams@frostburg.edu Jeremy Jakoby jakobjer@wcps.k12.md.us Mika Fox foxmik@wcps.k12.md.us High School 2006 Yes Developing F-0,S-1Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jamie Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Fountaindale Elementary 301-766-8156 Kris McGee KMcGee@frostburg.edu Megan Dodd doddmeg@wcps.k12.md.us Courtney Leard leardcou@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2012 Yes Beginning F-1,S-1

Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jaime Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Eastern Elementary 301-766-8122 Yvonne Belt v.belt@frostburg.edu Kristen English englikri@wcps.k12.md.us Danae Doudledee doubldan@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2016 Yes Beginning F-4,S-0 Title 1Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jaime Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Ruth Ann Monroe Elementary 301-766-8668 Kris McGee KMcGee@frostburg.edu Kathleen Forrest forrekat.wcps.k12.md.us Katie Carbaugh carbakat@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2008 Yes Developing F-0,S-0 Title 1Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jaime Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Williamsport Elementary 301-766-8415 Yvonne Belt v.belt@frostburg.edu Jana Palmer palmejan@wcps.k12.md.us Lori Ridgely ridgelor@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2016 Yes Beginning F-1,S-1Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jaime Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Maugansville Elementary 301-766-8230 Yvonne Belt v.belt@frostburg.edu Donna Newcomber newcodon@wcps.k12.md.us Jeanette Wagner wagnejea@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2016 Yes Beginning F-2,S-0Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jaime Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Smithsburg Elementary 301-766-8329 Kris McGee KMcGee@frostburg.edu Krista Burgan burgkri@wcps.k12.md.us Amie Hersh hershami@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2016 Yes Beginning F-0,S-0Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jaime Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Springfield Middle School 301-766-8389 Kris McGee KMcGee@frostburg.edu Christina Ruppentha ruppejen@wcps.k12.md.us Lindsey Reynolds reynolin@wcps.k12.md.us Middle School 2016 Yes Beginning F-1,S-0

Frostburg Toby Eirich tceirich@frostburg.ed 301-687-4451 Washington Jamie Hade HadeJam@wcps.k12.md.us Potomac Heights Elementary 301-766-8305 Kris McGee KMcGee@frostburg.edu Carl Starks starkcar@wcps.k12.md.us Jesse Orth orthjes@wcps.k12.md.us Elementary School 2012 Yes Beginning F-0,S-2

Name of IHE: Frostburg State University TPIP 2017 Performance Assessment Data

Intern Performance Data

Please report intern performance data for 2016-2017, the recently graduated program completers, if possible. Since IHEs had no previous notice that this data collection could be for the current cohort, data managers may use data for intern cohort 2015-2016, instead. MSDE is attempting to collect data in a more coherent, aligned manner, but did not provide enough advanced notice to require the alignment for the current collection.

Intern Performance Data are no longer collected by PDS, but rather by program or secondary/PreK-12 content areas. Scores should be aggregated across that program. For example, if edTPA, PPAT, or a similar programmatic assessment is being used, please aggregate the scores in a logical manner (by criteria or domain, etc.), explaining how the institution uses the resulting data for program improvement, and submit. If the institution uses a final portfolio assessment or other culminating performance-based assessment, aggregate the scores across the program as indicated above and submit. If the assessment has several domains, add lines by hitting the Tab button to present the aggregate scores by domain or criteria. Again, do not link intern performance data to specific PDS or other internship placements. Please keep explanations as concise as possible using this electronic document.

The deadline for the return of this document, Intern Performance Data, is June 2, 2017. Do not neglect to include the name of the IHE in the space indicated. Return by email to Michelle Dunkle at michelle.dunkle@maryland.gov. No paper copies will be accepted.

Describe the assignment. (EdTPA, Portfolio, or other culminating experience.)

Frostburg State University piloted edTPA with our first group (5) of candidates in the Fall 2016 semester. These 5 candidates completed 5 different content area edTPAs. Data is provided in this report. We had 10 candidates participate in the spring semester, adding 3 new content areas. National scores are not back for these submissions, therefore, this data is not provided in this report.

FSU’s COE teacher preparation programs implemented common assessments across all programs during the Spring 2016 semester. This report contains the common Unit Rubic and Performance Rating assessing all Intern (Practicum) II’s. Data is included from the Spring 2016 and Fall 2016 semesters.

Please supply the scoring rubric below for the assignment in #1.

edTPA National standard rubrics

Unit Rubric

Standard

Match

UILG

INTASC

SPA

Evidence Location

within Unit

Ineffective (1) Developing (2) Effective (3) Highly effective (4)

Knowledge of the students

3

2

Contextual Statement Interview

The candidate does not demonstrate knowledge of the major concepts, theories, and/or research related to development of students.

The candidate demonstrates limited knowledge of the major concepts, theories, and research related to development of students.

The candidate demonstrates adequate knowledge of the major concepts, theories, and research related to development of students.

The candidate demonstrates depth of knowledge of the major concepts, theories, and research related to development of students.

Knowledge of the subject content

3

4

Unit Overview: Written and oral Lesson Plans

The candidate does not demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structure of unit content.

The candidate demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structure of unit content.

The candidate demonstrates adequate knowledge and understanding of the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structure of unit content.

The candidate demonstrates depth of knowledge and understanding of the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structure of unit content.

Knowledge of curriculum standards

3

7

Unit Overview: written and oral

The candidate does not demonstrate knowledge of MD College & Career Ready Standards and/ or content standards applicable to the unit.

The candidate demonstrates limited knowledge of MD College & Career Ready Standards and/or content standards applicable to the unit.

The candidate demonstrates adequate knowledge of MD College & Career Ready Standards and/or content standards applicable to the unit.

The candidate demonstrates depth of knowledge of MD College & Career Ready Standards and/ or content standards applicable to the unit content.

Instructional Resources

3

7

Unit Overview: written

The candidate does not select materials/resources which are suitable for the students, supportive of the learning objectives, and engaging to students. Materials are not prepared for instruction. Teacher resources are missing or incomplete.

The candidate selects few appropriate materials/resources which are suitable for the students, supportive of the learning objectives, and are designed to engage students in meaningful learning; Materials are prepared for instruction. Teacher resources are identified.

The candidate selects appropriate materials/resources which are suitable for the students, supportive of the learning objectives, and are designed to engage students in meaningful learning; Materials are prepared for instruction in advanced. Teacher resources are relevant, appropriate and clearly identified with URL or resource cited.

The candidate selects high-quality, appropriate materials/resources which are suitable for the students, supportive of the learning objectives, and are designed to engage students in meaningful learning; Materials are prepared for use by students in advance for instruction. A variety of teacher resources are relevant, appropriate and clearly identified with URL or resource cited.

Pre-assessment data and analysis

3

8

Pre-assess document

The candidate does not select or develop a pre-

The candidate selects or develops an inappropriate

The candidate is able to select or develop an appropriate pre-

The candidate is able to select or develop an

assessment tool. The candidate does not analyze data and does not apply the results to the design of instruction.

pre-assessment tool. The candidate provides partial analysis of the data and partially applies the results to the design of instruction.

assessment tool. The candidate adequately analyzes the data and applies the results to the design of instruction.

effective, appropriate pre-assessment tool. The candidate analyzes the data and applies the interpreted results to the design of instruction.

Developing learning opportunities: Using knowledge of children and learning theory

3

2

Lesson Plans

The candidate develops learning opportunities that do not demonstrate knowledge about the students, learning theory and best teaching practices.

The candidate develops learning opportunities that demonstrate limited knowledge about the students, learning theory and best teaching practices.

The candidate develops learning opportunities that demonstrate adequate knowledge about the students, learning theory and best teaching practices.

The candidate develops learning opportunities that are innovative, and consistently demonstrates a depth of knowledge about the students, learning theory and best teaching practices.

Developing learning opportunities: Using knowledge of curriculum and content

3

1

Lesson Plans

The candidate develops learning opportunities that do not demonstrate knowledge about the curriculum and/or content to be taught; the learning opportunities generally are inappropriate for meeting the stated objective(s).

The candidate develops learning opportunities that demonstrate limited knowledge about the curriculum to be taught, content to be taught, and appropriateness for meeting the stated objective(s).

The candidate develops learning opportunities that demonstrate adequate knowledge about the curriculum to be taught, content to be taught, and appropriateness for meeting the stated objective(s).

The candidate develops learning opportunities that consistently demonstrate a depth of knowledge about the curriculum to be taught, content to be taught, and appropriateness for meeting the stated objective(s).

Developing learning opportunities: Providing support for student learning

3

5

Lesson Plans

The candidate does not develop learning opportunities that are achievable. The learning opportunities do not support student learning.

The candidate develops learning opportunities that are achievable but unsustainable to support student learning.

The candidate develops learning opportunities that are achievable for all students and provide support for student learning.

The candidate develops learning opportunities that are achievable but challenging for all students and provides strong support for student learning.

Using multiple teaching strategies

3

4

Lesson Plans

The candidate uses few teaching strategies or strategies that are not appropriate to age, ability level, and

The candidate uses multiple teaching strategies that are partially appropriate to age, ability level,

The candidate uses multiple teaching strategies that are adequately appropriate to age, ability level, and

The candidate uses multiple teaching strategies that are consistently appropriate to age, ability level, and

learning style, to the unit content, and to the learning goals.

and learning style, to the unit content, and to the learning goals.

learning style, to the unit content, and to the learning goals.

learning style, to the unit content, and to the learning goals.

Encouraging critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity

3

4

Lesson Plans

The candidate fails to engage students in critical thinking, problem-solving and creativity.

The candidate minimally engages students in critical thinking, problem-solving and promotes creativity.

The candidate adequately engages students in critical thinking, problem-solving, and promotes creativity.

The candidate consistently engages students in critical thinking, problem-solving and promotes creativity.

Adapting for diverse students

3

3

Lesson Plans

The candidate does not develop learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted/talented and culturally diverse learners based on classroom demographics.

The candidate minimally develops learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted/talented and culturally diverse learners based on classroom demographics.

The candidate adequately develops learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted/talented and culturally diverse learners based on classroom demographics.

The candidate consistently develops learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs learning styles, ELL, gifted/talented, and culturally diverse learners based on classroom demographics.

Using multiple assessments

3

8

Lesson Plans

The candidate does not use a variety of assessments to guide and strengthen instruction. No evidence exists of alignment between standards, objectives, developmental level and assessment.

The candidate rarely uses a variety of assessments to guide and strengthen instruction and evaluate student learning. There is some evidence of alignment between standards, objectives, developmental levels and assessment.

The candidate adequately uses a variety of assessments to guide and strengthen instruction and evaluate student learning. There is evidence of alignment between standards, objectives, developmental levels and assessment.

The candidate consistently uses a variety of assessments to guide and strengthen instruction and to evaluate student learning. There is evidence of complete alignment between standards, objectives, developmental levels and assessment.

Post assessment data

3

8

Post assess document

The candidate does not analyze the post assessment data and is unable to determine the impact

The candidate partially analyzes post assessment data and determines the

The candidate adequately analyzes post assessment data and determines the impact on student

The candidate completely analyzes post assessment data and determines the

on student learning to make future instructional decisions.

impact on student learning to make future instructional decisions.

learning to make future instructional decisions.

impact on student learning to make future instructional decisions.

Reflection

3

9

Reflection document : Written and oral

The candidate uses the questions suggested to guide reflection but the reflection is superficial and demonstrates lack of understanding.

The candidate uses the questions suggested to guide a limited reflection.

The candidate uses the questions suggested to guide an adequate, thoughtful and logical reflection.

The candidate uses the questions suggested to guide an introspective, comprehensive and logical reflection.

Performance Rating

Domain 1: Designing Coherent Instruction The teacher candidate designs and organizes instruction and assessment procedures for all students based upon a thorough knowledge of subject matter, pedagogy, and students.

Competency

Standard

Ineffective 1

Developing 2

Effective 3

Highly Effective

4

INTASC Institutio

nal Learning Goal SPA

Knowledge of Students

1 Intern demonstrates a lack of knowledge regarding major concepts, theories and research related to the development of students.

Intern demonstrates partial knowledge of the major concepts, theories and research related to the development of students.

Intern demonstrates adequate knowledge of the major concepts, theories and research related to the development of students.

Intern demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of the major concepts, theories and research related to the development of students.

3

Content knowledge

4 Intern demonstrates lack of knowledge and understanding of central concepts, tools of inquiry and the ability to implement content.

Intern demonstrates partial knowledge and understanding of central concepts, tools of inquiry and the ability to implement content.

Intern demonstrates adequate knowledge and understanding of central concepts, tools of inquiry and the ability to implement content.

Intern demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and understanding of central concepts, tools of inquiry and the ability to implement content.

3

Knowledge of Curriculum and Objectives

7

Intern demonstrates lack of knowledge of Maryland College and Career Ready Standards and/or content standards; Standards are not aligned to objectives/learning outcomes.

Intern demonstrates partial knowledge of Maryland College and Career Ready Standards and/or content standards; Standards are partially aligned to objectives/learning outcomes.

Intern demonstrates adequate knowledge of Maryland College and Career Ready Standards and/or content standards; Standards are adequately aligned to objectives/learning outcomes.

Intern demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of Maryland College and Career Ready Standards and/or content standards; Standards are fully aligned to objectives/learning outcomes.

3

Prerequisite skills and concepts

5

Intern demonstrates a lack of knowledge of prerequisite skills and concepts relevant to instructional planning.

Intern demonstrates partial knowledge of prerequisite skills and concepts relevant to instructional planning.

Intern demonstrates adequate knowledge of prerequisite skills and concepts relevant to instructional planning.

Intern demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of prerequisite skills and concepts relevant to instructional planning.

3

Competency

Standard

Ineffective 1

Developing 2

Effective 3

Highly Effective

4

INTASC Institutio

nal Learning Goal SPA

Assessment

6 Intern lacks the ability to align assessments to standards, objectives/learning outcomes, developmental levels and instruction; measures fail to monitor student learning during instruction.

Intern partially demonstrates the ability to align varied assessments to standards, objectives/learning outcomes, developmental levels and instruction; these measures partially monitor student learning during instruction.

Intern adequately demonstrates the ability to align varied assessments to standards, objectives/learning outcomes, developmental levels and instruction; these measures monitor student learning at multiple points throughout instruction.

Intern demonstrates the ability to align multiple and varied assessments to standards, objectives/learning outcomes, developmental levels and instruction; these measures monitor student learning at multiple points throughout instruction and utilize pre- and post- assessment analysis.

3

Instructional strategies

8

Intern demonstrates the inability to develop multiple teaching strategies that reflect a wide range of pedagogical approaches to the discipline(s). Intern lacks the ability to align teaching strategies to standards, objectives, developmental levels and assessment. Intern lacks the ability to engage students in promoting critical thinking and problem-solving, and creativity.

Intern partially demonstrates the ability to develop multiple teaching strategies that reflect a wide range of pedagogical approaches to the discipline(s). Intern partially aligns multiple teaching strategies to standards, objectives, developmental levels and assessment. Intern partially engages students in critical thinking and problem-solving, and creativity.

Intern adequately demonstrates the ability to develop multiple teaching strategies that reflect a wide range of pedagogical approaches to the discipline(s). Intern aligns multiple teaching strategies to standards, objectives, developmental levels and assessment. Intern engages students in promoting critical thinking and problem-solving, and creativity.

Intern demonstrates the ability to develop varied and multiple teaching strategies that reflect a wide range of pedagogical approaches to the discipline(s). Intern fully aligns varied and multiple teaching strategies to standards, objectives, developmental levels and assessment. Intern fully engages students in promoting critical thinking and problem-solving, and creativity.

3

Competency

Standard

Ineffective 1

Developing 2

Effective 3

Highly Effective

4

INTASC

Institutional

Learning Goal SPA

Differentiated instruction

2 Intern does not develop learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted and talented, and culturally diverse learners.

Intern partially develops learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted and talented, and culturally diverse learners.

Intern adequately develops learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted and talented, and culturally diverse learners.

Intern develops multiple learning opportunities that effectively differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted and talented, and culturally diverse learners.

5

Selection of

curriculum materials and resources

7 Intern selects inappropriate materials/resources suitable for the students, supporting the learning objectives, and designed to engage students in meaningful learning; Materials are

Intern selects materials/resources partially suitable for the students, supporting the learning objectives, and designed to engage students in meaningful learning; Materials are prepared for

Intern selects appropriate materials/resources suitable for the students, supporting the learning objectives, and designed to engage students in meaningful learning; Materials are prepared for instruction in advance.

Intern selects highly effective materials/ resources suitable for the students, supporting the learning objectives, and designed to engage students in meaningful learning; Materials are prepared and well-organized for instruction in advance.

3

Comments/Recommendations:

Domain 2: Creating a Powerful Learning Environment The teacher candidate uses appropriate, effective classroom practices, procedures, and pedagogies to create and manage a productive learning environment.

Competency

Standard

Ineffective 1

Developing 2

Effective 3

Highly Effective

4

INTASC

Institutional

Learning Goals

SPA

Communication of

student expectation

s

3 Intern does not communicate high expectations for student achievement and does not provide equitable opportunities for all students to learn and be successful.

Intern inconsistently communicates high expectations for student achievement and inconsistently provides equitable opportunities for all students to learn and be successful.

Intern communicates high expectations for student achievement and adequately provides equitable opportunities for all students to learn and be successful.

Intern constantly and consistently communicates high expectations for student achievement and adequately provides equitable opportunities for all students to learn and be successful.

3

Classroom climate

3 Intern does not promote positive social interactions with students and among peers.

Intern inconsistently promotes positive social interactions with students and among peers.

Intern promotes positive social interactions with students and among peers.

Intern promotes and models positive social interactions with students and among peers.

3

Enthusiasm for teaching and learning

3 Intern does not convey enthusiasm for the subject matter and does not promote active engageme

Intern inconsistently conveys enthusiasm for the subject matter and inconsistently promotes active

Intern conveys enthusiasm for the subject matter and promotes active engagement to

Intern consistently and constantly conveys enthusiasm for the subject matter and promotes

3

not prepared for instruction in advance.

instruction in advance.

Long- and short- range planning

7 Planning lacks organization and is poorly sequenced to impact student learning; planning lacks relationships among concepts within and across disciplines.

Planning is partially organized and sequenced to impact student learning; planning partially shows relationships among concepts within and across disciplines.

Planning is adequately organized and sequenced to impact student learning; planning shows relationships among concepts within and across disciplines.

Planning is well- organized and sequenced to maximize student learning; planning shows a comprehensive understanding of the relationships among concepts within and across disciplines.

3

nt to influence student participation.

engagement to influence student participation.

influence student participation.

active engagement to highly motivate students to participate.

Managing behavior

3 Intern does not respond to student behavior in a consistent, appropriate and/or respectful manner.

Intern inconsistently responds to student behavior in an appropriate and respectful manner.

Intern responds to student behavior in an appropriate and respectful manner.

Intern proactively and consistently responds to student behavior in an appropriate and respectful manner and shows sensitivity to student needs.

3

Competency

Standard

Ineffective 1

Developing 2

Effective 3

Highly Effective

4

INTASC Institutional

Learning Goal SPA

Maintaining classroom procedures

3 Intern does not maintain established routines and/or use problem-solving strategies to promote efficient, productive, safe, and equally accessible learning environment.

Intern inconsistently maintains established routines and inconsistently uses problem-solving strategies to promote efficient, productive, safe, and accessible learning environment.

Intern maintains established routines and uses problem-solving strategies to promote efficient, productive, safe, and an equally accessible learning environment.

Intern constantly and consistently maintains established routines and proactively uses problem-solving strategies to promote efficient, productive, safe, and an equally accessible learning environment.

3

Comments/Recommendations:

Domain 3: Implementing Effective Teaching for High Quality Learning The teacher candidate demonstrates strong communication skills, employs effective teaching strategies and methodologies, integrates technology into instruction, and uses a variety of assessment measures to impact student learning.

Competency

Standard

Ineffective 1

Developing 2

Effective 3

Highly Effective

4

INTASC

Institutional

Learning Goals

SPA

Communication

8 Intern uses inappropriate oral and written communication; direction/procedures are not clearly presented

Intern inconsistently uses appropriate oral and written communication; direction/procedures are

Intern uses appropriate oral and written communication; direction/procedures are clearly presented

Intern consistently models and promotes appropriate oral and written communication; direction/proc

2

and appropriate for the students.

inconsistently presented in a clear and appropriate way for the students.

and appropriate for the students.

edures are well developed, clearly presented, and appropriate for all students.

Active learning

8 Activities and assignments are inappropriate for students; students are not engaged in exploration of the content or skills.

Activities and assignments are inconsistently appropriate for students; few students are engaged in exploration of the content or skills.

Activities and assignments are appropriate for students; most students are engaged in exploration of the content or skills.

Activities and assignments are appropriate for all students; all students are fully engaged in exploration of the content or skills.

3

Instructional decisions based on assessment results

6 Intern does not demonstrate flexibility and responsiveness in order to make adjustments to instruction based on informal, formal, formative and summative assessment results.

Intern inconsistently demonstrates flexibility and responsiveness in order to make adjustments to instruction based on informal, formal, formative and summative assessment results.

Intern demonstrates flexibility and responsiveness in order to make adjustments to instruction based on informal, formal, formative and summative assessment results.

Intern constantly demonstrates flexibility and responsiveness in order to make adjustments to instruction based on informal, formal, formative and summative assessment results and demonstrates the use of assessment results to adjust instruction.

3

Competency

Standard

Ineffective 1

Developing 2

Effective 3

Highly Effective

4

INTASC

Institutional

Learning Goal SPA

Instructional strategies

8 Intern does not use teaching strategies that are appropriate to age, ability level and learning styles. Questions reflect the lower levels of Bloom’s taxonomy and do not stimulate critical thinking, problem-solving and active inquiry for all learners.

Intern uses teaching strategies that are inconsistently appropriate to age, ability level and learning styles. Questions reflect the different levels of Bloom’s taxonomy and inconsistently stimulate critical thinking, problem-solving and active inquiry for all learners.

Intern uses multiple teaching strategies that are adequately appropriate to age, ability levels and learning styles. Questions reflect the different levels of Bloom’s taxonomy and stimulate critical thinking, problem-solving and active inquiry for all learners.

Intern consistently uses varied and multiple teaching strategies that are appropriate to age, ability levels and learning styles. Questions reflect the use of mostly the highest levels of Bloom’s taxonomy and stimulate critical thinking, problem-solving and active inquiry for all learners.

3

Differentiated instruction 2 Intern fails to

demonstrate learning

Intern inconsistently demonstrates

Intern adequately demonstrates

Intern consistently and

5 opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted and talented, and culturally diverse learners.

learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted and talented, and culturally diverse learners.

learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted and talented, and culturally diverse learners.

constantly demonstrates learning opportunities that differentiate for special needs, learning styles, ELL, gifted and talented, and culturally diverse learners.

Technology in instruction

8 Intern does not use technology skills to promote learning and monitor student progress. Intern does not use technology to collect, analyze, and report data.

Intern inconsistently utilizes technology skills to promote learning and monitor student progress. Intern partially uses technology to collect, analyze, and report data.

Intern utilizes technology skills to promote learning and monitor student progress. Intern uses technology to collect, analyze, and report data. .

Intern consistently utilizes technology skills to model learning and monitor student progress. Intern uses a variety of technology to collect, analyze, and report data and implements changes based on the results.

3

Comments/Recommendations:

Domain 4: Assuming Professional Responsibilities The teacher candidate engages in professional development, demonstrates ethical conduct in working with all constituencies (students, colleagues, parents/guardians, and community members), and reflects upon instruction and student learning to assess teaching effectiveness.

Competency

Standard

Ineffective 1

Developing 2

Effective 3

Highly Effective

4

INTASC Institutional Lrng. Goal

SPA

Reflection on one’s own practice

9 Intern does not self- evaluate and act upon reasonable critical evaluation to improve instruction.

Intern inconsistently uses self-evaluation and irregularly acts upon reasonable critical evaluation to improve instruction.

Intern continuously uses self-evaluation and acts upon reasonable critical evaluation to improve instruction.

Intern continuously uses self-evaluation and seeks out reasonable critical evaluation to improve instruction; searches for additional resources to

3

improve instruction.

Accepting responsibility

9 Intern does not accept responsibility for own actions relative to students and learning community and does not seek solutions to problems.

Intern inconsistently accepts responsibility for own actions relative to students and learning community and to some extent seeks solutions to problems.

Intern accepts responsibility for own actions relative to students and learning community and seeks solutions to problems.

Intern consistently and constantly accepts responsibility for own actions relative to students and learning community and demonstrates application of problem-solving skills.

4

Partnerships

10 Intern does not establish a partnership with school, home, or community.

Intern inconsistently establishes a partnership with school, home, or community.

Intern establishes a productive partnership with school, home, or community.

Intern continuously establishes and promotes a productive partnership with school, home, or community.

4

Professional development

9 Intern does not pursue opportunities to grow professionally.

Intern participates in professional activities when provided but doesn’t actively seek out opportunities to grow.

Intern actively seeks out and pursues opportunities to grow professionally.

Intern actively seeks out and pursues opportunities to grow professionally and demonstrates application of knowledge and skills obtained.

3

Comments/Recommendations:

Intern Performance Data 2016-2017

edTPA data – Fall 2016

Examinee Name / SSN Test P/F Sta Test Date Total Te Avg Rub Rubric / S 01

NB Elementary Literacy (03/12-Present) T 2016-12-15 45 3.0 3.0

AD MC Mathematics (03/12-Present) T 2016-12-15 55 3.7 4.0

JT Elementary Math (03/12-Present) T 2017-01-12 45 3.0 3.0

BM MC History/Social Studies (03/12-Present) T 2017-02-23 34 2.3 2.0

AC Early Childhood (03/12-Present) T 2017-01-12 40 2.7 3.0

Common Unit data – Spring 2016

Unit Rubric Scores: 1 = Ineffective 2 = Developing

3 = Effective 4 = Highly Effective

Knowledge of the students

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.52/4

(88.08%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 41 47.67% 45 52.33%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.47/4

(86.72%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 17 53.13% 15 46.88%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 50% 3 50%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.53/4

(88.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 46.67% 8 53.33%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 60% 4 40%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.73/4

(93.18%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 27.27% 8 72.73%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 3 75%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 50% 2 50%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Knowledge of the subject

content

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.64/4

(90.99%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 31 36.05% 55 63.95%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.66/4

(91.41%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 11 34.38% 21 65.63%

Elementary 6 Score 1 2 3 4

Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.53/4

(88.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 46.67% 8 53.33%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 60% 4 40%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.82/4

(95.45%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 18.18% 9 81.82%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 3 75%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Knowledge of curriculum

standards

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.56/4

(88.95%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 1.16% 36 41.86% 49 56.98%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.66/4

(91.41%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 11 34.38% 21 65.63%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 6.67% 8 53.33% 6 40%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.20/4

(80.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 8 80% 2 20%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.73/4

(93.18%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 27.27% 8 72.73%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=3.25/4

(81.25%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 75% 1 25%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Instructional Resources

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.59/4

(89.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 1 1.16% 1 1.16% 30 34.88% 54 62.79%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.66/4

(91.41%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.13% 9 28.13% 22 68.75%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.60/4

(90.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 40% 9 60%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.20/4

(80.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 8 80% 2 20%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.73/4

(93.18%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 27.27% 8 72.73%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=2.75/4

(68.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 1 25% 0 0% 2 50% 1 25%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Pre-assessment data and

analysis

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.44/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(86.05%) Count/% 0 0% 6 6.98% 36 41.86% 44 51.16%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.59/4

(89.84%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 13 40.63% 19 59.38%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.53/4

(88.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 46.67% 8 53.33%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 7 70% 2 20%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.82/4

(95.45%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 18.18% 9 81.82%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=2.00/4

(50.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 4 100% 0 0% 0 0%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 50% 2 50%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%

Developing learning

opportunities: Using

knowledge of children and

learning theory

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.52/4

(88.08%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 2.33% 37 43.02% 47 54.65%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.69/4

(92.19%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 10 31.25% 22 68.75%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 9 60% 6 40%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.20/4

(80.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 20% 4 40% 4 40%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.82/4

(95.45%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 18.18% 9 81.82%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100% 0 0%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100% 0 0%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Developing learning

opportunities: Using

knowledge of curriculum and

content

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.63/4

(90.70%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 32 37.21% 54 62.79%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.63/4

(90.63%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 12 37.5% 20 62.5%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 9 60% 6 40%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.20/4

(80.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 8 80% 2 20%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.91/4

(97.73%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 9.09% 10 90.91%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 3 75%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Developing learning

opportunities: Providing

support for student learning

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.65/4

(91.28%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 30 34.88% 56 65.12%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.66/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(91.41%) Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 11 34.38% 21 65.63%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.60/4

(90.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 40% 9 60%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.70/4

(92.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 30% 7 70%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.73/4

(93.18%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 27.27% 8 72.73%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100% 0 0%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 3 75%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Using multiple teaching

strategies

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.69/4

(92.15%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 27 31.4% 59 68.6%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.81/4

(95.31%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 18.75% 26 81.25%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.60/4

(90.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 40% 9 60%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.20/4

(80.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 8 80% 2 20%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.91/4

(97.73%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 9.09% 10 90.91%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100% 0 0%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 3 75%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(100.00%) Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Encouraging critical thinking,

problem solving, and

creativity

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.43/4

(85.76%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 5 5.81% 39 45.35% 42 48.84%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 16 50% 16 50%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 10 66.67% 5 33.33%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 20% 6 60% 2 20%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.82/4

(95.45%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 18.18% 9 81.82%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=2.75/4

(68.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 3 75%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Adapting for diverse students

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.29/4

(82.27%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 9 10.47% 43 50% 34 39.53%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.47/4

(86.72%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 17 53.13% 15 46.88%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.40/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(85.00%) Count/% 0 0% 1 6.67%

7 46.67%

7 46.67%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=2.80/4

(70.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 3 30%

6 60% 1 10%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.55/4

(88.64%)

Score 1 2

3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0%

5 45.45% 6 54.55%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=2.00/4

(50.00%)

Score 1 2

3 4

Count/% 0 0% 4 100%

0 0% 0 0%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2

3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0%

4 100% 0 0%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2

3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Using multiple assessments

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.44/4

(86.05%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 5 5.81% 38 44.19% 43 50%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.53/4

(88.28%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 15 46.88% 17 53.13%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.27/4

(81.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 6.67% 9 60% 5 33.33%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 7 70% 2 20%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.82/4

(95.45%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 18.18% 9 81.82%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=2.75/4

(68.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 3 75%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Post assessment data

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit DRF Template: Initial

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.48/4

(86.92%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 5 5.81% 35 40.7% 46 53.49%

Early Childhood 32 Score 1 2 3 4

Avg.=3.66/4

(91.41%)

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 11 34.38% 21 65.63%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.53/4

(88.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 46.67% 8 53.33%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 20% 5 50% 3 30%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.82/4

(95.45%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 18.18% 9 81.82%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=2.50/4

(62.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 50% 2 50% 0 0%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 100% 0 0%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%

Reflection

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Unit

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 86 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.86%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 3 3.49% 22 25.58% 61 70.93%

Early Childhood 32 Avg.=3.72/4

(92.97%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.13% 7 21.88% 24 75%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 15 Avg.=3.53/4

(88.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 6.67% 5 33.33% 9 60%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 60% 4 40%

Middle 11 Avg.=3.91/4

(97.73%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 9.09% 10 90.91%

P-12: HPED 4 Avg.=3.25/4 Score 1 2 3 4

SUMMARY

Average of Criterion Averages

for All Candidates

3.54/4

(88.50%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Early Childhood

3.62/4

(90.51%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Elementary

3.79/4

(94.64%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for MAT Elementary

3.47/4

(86.79%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for MAT Secondary

3.21/4

(80.36%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Middle

3.79/4

(94.81%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for P-12: HPED

2.96/4

(74.11%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for P-12: Music

3.63/4

(90.63%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Secondary

3.61/4

(90.18%)

Common Unit data – Fall 2016 – Summary provided, full data report available if requested

Average of Criterion Averages

for All Candidates

3.62/4

(90.57%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Early Childhood

3.81/4

(95.31%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Elementary

4.00/4

(100.00%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for MAT Elementary

3.14/4

(78.57%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for MAT Secondary

3.71/4

(92.86%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Middle

3.32/4

(83.04%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for P­12: HPED

3.39/4

(84.82%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for P­12: Music

3.79/4

(94.64%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Secondary

3.60/4

(89.88%)

Common Performance Rating – Spring 2016

.25%) Count/% 0 0% 1 25% 1 25% 2 50%

P-12: Music 4 Avg.=3.75/4 (93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 3 75%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4 (100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Performance Rating Scores:

1 = Ineffective 2 = Developing 3 = Effective 4 = Highly Effective

DESIGNING COHERENT

INSTRUCTION Knowledge of

Students

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.48/4

(87.08%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 1.12% 44 49.44% 44 49.44%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.42/4

(85.61%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 19 57.58% 14 42.42%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 50% 7 50%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 7 70% 2 20%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.80/4

(95.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 8 80%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 25% 6 75%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 66.67% 1 33.33%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%

Content knowledge

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.49/4

(87.36%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 2.25% 41 46.07% 46 51.69%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.36/4

(84.09%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 19 57.58% 13 39.39%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.43/4

(85.71%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 6 42.86% 7 50%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.60/4

(90.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 40% 6 60%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 60% 4 40%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 25% 6 75%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Knowledge of Curriculum and

Objectives

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.44/4

(85.96%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 1.12% 48 53.93% 40 44.94%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.39/4

(84.85%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 20 60.61% 13 39.39%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.29/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(82.14%) Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 10 71.43% 4 28.57%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.30/4

(82.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 5 50% 4 40%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 50% 5 50%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.63/4

(90.63%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 37.5% 5 62.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Prerequisite skills and

concepts

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.51/4

(87.64%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 4 4.49% 36 40.45% 49 55.06%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.52/4

(87.88%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 14 42.42% 18 54.55%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 5 35.71% 8 57.14%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 20% 6 60% 2 20%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 50% 5 50%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 25% 6 75%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 100%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Assessment

Folio Area:

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.35/4

(83.71%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 3 3.37% 52 58.43% 34 38.2%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 20 60.61% 12 36.36%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.29/4

(82.14%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 10 71.43% 4 28.57%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 8 80% 1 10%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.60/4

(90.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 40% 6 60%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.25/4

(81.25%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 12.5% 4 50% 3 37.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 66.67% 1 33.33%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Instructional strategies

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.46/4

(86.52%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 4 4.49% 40 44.94% 45 50.56%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.48/4

(87.12%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 15 45.45% 17 51.52%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.29/4

(82.14%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 14.29% 6 42.86% 6 42.86%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.30/4

(82.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 5 50% 4 40%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 50% 5 50%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 50% 4 50%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 66.67% 1 33.33%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Differentiated Instruction

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.28/4

(82.02%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 5 5.62% 54 60.67% 30 33.71%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 6.06% 18 54.55% 13 39.39%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.21/4

(80.36%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 9 64.29% 4 28.57%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=2.90/4

(72.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 20% 7 70% 1 10%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.30/4

(82.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 70% 3 30%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.38/4

(84.38%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 62.5% 3 37.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 66.67% 1 33.33%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Selection of curriculum

materials and resources

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

Assessments

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.66/4

(91.57%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 30 33.71% 59 66.29%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.70/4

(92.42%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 10 30.3% 23 69.7%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.64/4

(91.07%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 35.71% 9 64.29%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.30/4

(82.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 70% 3 30%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.80/4

(95.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 8 80%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.63/4

(90.63%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 37.5% 5 62.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Long and short range

planning

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.54/4

(88.48%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 4 4.49% 33 37.08% 52 58.43%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.61/4

(90.15%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 11 33.33% 21 63.64%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 5 35.71% 8 57.14%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=2.90/4

(72.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 20% 7 70% 1 10%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.60/4

(90.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 40% 6 60%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.50/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(87.50%) Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 50% 4 50%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

CREATING A POWERFUL

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Communication of student

expectations

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.85%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 2.25% 25 28.09% 62 69.66%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.76/4

(93.94%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 6 18.18% 26 78.79%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.57/4

(89.29%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 42.86% 8 57.14%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 7 70% 2 20%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.90/4

(97.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 10% 9 90%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.88/4

(96.88%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 12.5% 7 87.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 66.67% 1 33.33%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Classroom Climate

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.76/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(94.10%) Count/% 0 0% 2 2.25% 17 19.1% 70 78.65%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.91/4

(97.73%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 9.09% 30 90.91%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 14 Score 1 2 3 4

Avg.=3.71/4

(92.86%)

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 2 14.29% 11 78.57%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.20/4

(80.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 6 60% 3 30%

Middle 10 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 10 100%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.63/4

(90.63%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 37.5% 5 62.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Enthusiasm for teaching and

learning

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.73/4

(93.26%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 2.25% 20 22.47% 67 75.28%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 9 27.27% 23 69.7%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.79/4

(94.64%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 21.43% 11 78.57%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.60/4

(90.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 2 20% 7 70%

Middle 10 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 10 100%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.63/4

(90.63%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 37.5% 5 62.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Managing Behavior

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.48/4

(87.08%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 5 5.62% 36 40.45% 48 53.93%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 11 33.33% 22 66.67%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.43/4

(85.71%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 6 42.86% 7 50%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=2.80/4

(70.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 3 30% 6 60% 1 10%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 50% 5 50%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.63/4

(90.63%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 37.5% 5 62.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 66.67% 1 33.33%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Maintaining Classroom

Procedures

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.66/4

(91.57%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 2.25% 26 29.21% 61 68.54%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.73/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(93.18%) Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 7 21.21% 25 75.76%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.57/4

(89.29%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 4 28.57% 9 64.29%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.30/4

(82.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 70% 3 30%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.70/4

(92.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 30% 7 70%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.88/4

(96.88%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 12.5% 7 87.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.33/4

(83.33%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 66.67% 1 33.33%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

IMPLEMENTING EFFECTIVE

TEACHING FOR HIGH

QUALITY LEARNING

Communication

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.55/4

(88.76%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 2.25% 36 40.45% 51 57.3%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.55/4

(88.64%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 13 39.39% 19 57.58%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.43/4

(85.71%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 8 57.14% 6 42.86%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 7 70% 2 20%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.70/4

(92.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 30% 7 70%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 25% 6 75%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.33/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(83.33%) Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 66.67% 1 33.33%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Active learning

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.51/4

(87.64%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 1.12% 42 47.19% 46 51.69%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.48/4

(87.12%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 17 51.52% 16 48.48%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.36/4

(83.93%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 9 64.29% 5 35.71%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 7 70% 2 20%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.80/4

(95.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 8 80%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.63/4

(90.63%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 37.5% 5 62.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Instructional Decisions based

on Assessment results

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.47/4

(86.80%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 4 4.49% 39 43.82% 46 51.69%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.42/4

(85.61%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 6.06% 15 45.45% 16 48.48%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 5 35.71% 8 57.14%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 7 70% 2 20%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.80/4

(95.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 8 80%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 50% 4 50%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 0 0%

Instructional Strategies

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.37/4

(84.27%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 5 5.62% 46 51.69% 38 42.7%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.30/4

(82.58%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 3 9.09% 17 51.52% 13 39.39%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 50% 3 50%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.29/4

(82.14%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 8 57.14% 5 35.71%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.20/4

(80.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 6 60% 3 30%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.70/4

(92.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 30% 7 70%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 50% 4 50%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 100% 0 0%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Differentiated instruction

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.29/4

(82.30%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 4 4.49% 55 61.8% 30 33.71%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.30/4

(82.58%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 6.06% 19 57.58% 12 36.36%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 33.33% 4 66.67%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.29/4

(82.14%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 7.14% 8 57.14% 5 35.71%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 8 80% 1 10%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 60% 4 40%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.38/4

(84.38%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 62.5% 3 37.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 100% 0 0%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

Technology in instruction

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.48/4

(87.08%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 7 7.87% 32 35.96% 50 56.18%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.48/4

(87.12%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 17 51.52% 16 48.48%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.43/4

(85.71%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 14.29% 4 28.57% 8 57.14%

MAT Secondary 10 Score 1 2 3 4

Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 4 40% 5 50%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.80/4

(95.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 8 80%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 3 37.5% 2 25% 3 37.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

ASSUMING PROFESSIONAL

RESPONSIBILITY Reflection

on one’s own practice

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.85%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 3 3.37% 23 25.84% 63 70.79%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.76/4

(93.94%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 8 24.24% 25 75.76%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 14.29% 3 21.43% 9 64.29%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.30/4

(82.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 5 50% 4 40%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.80/4

(95.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 8 80%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.88/4

(96.88%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 12.5% 7 87.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Accepting responsibility

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.74/4

(93.54%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 2.25% 19 21.35% 68 76.4%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.82/4

(95.45%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 6 18.18% 27 81.82%

Elementary 6 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.64/4

(91.07%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 35.71% 9 64.29%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.40/4

(85.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 4 40% 5 50%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.90/4

(97.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 10% 9 90%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.88/4

(96.88%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 12.5% 7 87.5%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Partnerships

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.58/4

(89.61%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 2 2.25% 33 37.08% 54 60.67%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.64/4

(90.91%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 10 30.3% 22 66.67%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.64/4

(91.07%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 5 35.71% 9 64.29%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.20/4

(80.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 6 60% 3 30%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.80/4 Score 1 2 3 4

(95.00%) Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 8 80%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 4 50% 4 50%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.00/4

(75.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 3 100% 0 0%

Secondary 2 Avg.=4.00/4

(100.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100%

Professional Development

Folio Area:

Internship/Practicum II

Assessments: Performance

Rating

DRF Template: Initial

Certification Common

Internship II / Practicum II

Assessments

Authors

evaluated

Results for

Group

Distribution of scores

All Candidates 89 Avg.=3.53/4

(88.20%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 3 3.37% 36 40.45% 50 56.18%

Early Childhood 33 Avg.=3.52/4

(87.88%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 3.03% 14 42.42% 18 54.55%

Elementary 6 Avg.=3.83/4

(95.83%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 16.67% 5 83.33%

MAT Elementary 14 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 7 50% 7 50%

MAT Secondary 10 Avg.=3.10/4

(77.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 1 10% 7 70% 2 20%

Middle 10 Avg.=3.80/4

(95.00%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 8 80%

P-12: HPED 8 Avg.=3.75/4

(93.75%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 2 25% 6 75%

P-12: Music 3 Avg.=3.67/4

(91.67%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33.33% 2 66.67%

Secondary 2 Avg.=3.50/4

(87.50%)

Score 1 2 3 4

Count/% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 1 50%

SUMMARY

Average of Criterion Averages

for All Candidates

3.53/4

(88.26%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Early Childhood

3.55/4

(88.70%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Elementary

3.83/4

(95.83%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for MAT Elementary

3.47/4

(86.76%)

May 2017 Intern Performance Data 2015-2016 Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE)

37 | P a g e

Average of Criterion Averages 3.18/4

for MAT Secondary (79.48%)

Average of Criterion Averages 3.69/4

for Middle (92.29%)

Average of Criterion Averages 3.60/4

for P-12: HPED (90.10%)

Average of Criterion Averages 3.49/4

for P-12: Music (87.15%)

Average of Criterion Averages 3.79/4

for Secondary (94.79%)

Common Performance Rating – Fall 2016 - Summary provided, full data report available if requested

Average of Criterion Averages

for All Candidates

3.70/4

(92.54%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Early Childhood

3.78/4

(94.40%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Elementary

3.92/4

(97.92%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for MAT Elementary

3.75/4

(93.75%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for MAT Secondary

3.92/4

(97.92%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for Middle

3.28/4

(82.03%)

Average of Criterion Averages

for P­12: HPED

3.81/4

(95.31%)

May 2017 Intern Performance Data 2015-2016 Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE)

38 | P a g e

Average of Criterion Averages

for P­12: Music

3.65/4

(91.15%)

Average of Criterion Averages

3.72/4

Please describe how your institution uses the data from #3 to facilitate ongoing program improvement We have established a time line for reviewing Program Data and Common Unit Data. The common unit data shared in this report is first reviewed by a Leadership Committee comprised of program coordinators of each of the initial certification programs. The committee looks at how we are meeting our common learning outcomes, InTASC standards. All rubrics are tagged to InTASC standards and reports are run by standards. A smaller group (EPP Committee) comprised of 3 oversight coordinators (P-9, Sec/P-12, Advanced) put together the data to see what it looks like across all programs. Strengths, weaknesses, and action items are identified. This information is shared with our P-20 Council and then with our COE Assessment Committee which includes our Institutional folks. (We have data sharing documentation we can provide if needed.) We are currently focusing on a systematic (and simpler) way to make data sharing and closing the loop most effective. Name of person completing this report: Date: Jennifer Delaney 5/25/2017

May 2017 Intern Performance Data 2015-2016 Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE)

39 | P a g e

____________________________________________ ________________________