high-temperature selective emitter for thermophotovoltaic ... · 2 o 3 spacer – al 2 o 3 and pt:...
TRANSCRIPT
Physical
Sciences Inc.
Physical Sciences Inc. 20 New England Business Center Andover, MA 01810
High-temperature Selective Emitter for
Thermophotovoltaic Energy Conversion
David Woolf and Joel Hensley
Physical Sciences Inc., Andover, MA
Jeff Cederberg and Eric A. Shaner
Sandia National Laboratories
OSA Incubator on the Fundamental Limits of
Optical Energy Conversion
12-14 November 2014
VG14-148
0
Acknowledgement of Support and Disclaimer
This material is based upon work supported by the Office of Naval Research under Contract Number_N00017-13-P-1190. Any opinions, findings and conclusions
or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Naval Research.
Physical Sciences Inc.
Physical Sciences Inc. ‒ Who we are
A growing 41 year-old company of 180
talented scientists, engineers and
administrative personnel
PSI is headquartered in Andover, MA, with
operations in Bedford, MA; Dayton, OH;
Lanham, MD; Princeton, NJ and Pleasanton,
CA
PSI companies FY2014 revenues of >$40M
Q-Peak manufactures lasers and optical
devices
Research Support Instruments supports
space ops
Faraday Technology develops industrial
processes
Multiple commercial spin-outs
PSI is a 100% employee owned company
VG14-148 -1
Significant efforts in
developing photonics-
based technologies and
devices
Sensors: RMLD, TLDAS,
QCL systems
AIRIS, LIDAR
Thermophotovoltaics
Physical Sciences Inc.
Thermophotovoltaics Overview
1980s
– Very high
temperature
emitters
• Rare earth
oxides,
SiC, etc
Emitter PV Cell Heat in Electrical
Power OUT Radiation
Concentrated
solar energy,
combustion
source
Blackbody,
greybody, modified
emissive surface
Silicon
Germanium,
III-Vs
1990s
– Low bandgap
materials
• Ge
• InGaAs,
Sb-based
materials
2000s
– Breakthrough in
spectrally selective
materials
• Plasmonics
• Metamaterials
Now
Can we make a selective emitter that:
Survives T > 1300 K
Survives repeated thermal cycling
Operates in ambient atmosphere
Has non-directional (Lambertian)
emission
Matches well with PV EQE
VG14-148 -2
Filt
er
Dielectric filters,
Plasma (TCO
filters)
Physical Sciences Inc.
TPV Energy Conversion: Model
VG14-148 -3
Assume InGaAs 0.6 eV TPV cell, 1300K blackbody
Most power, photons are below band-gap
– useless if transmitted, increases TPV heating if
absorbed
Predicts hTPV = 8.25%, Pout = 1.28 W/cm2
Can see hTPV as PPV/Prad
Black Body Power Spectrum
𝑃 =2ℎ𝑐2
𝜆5
1
𝑒ℎ𝑐
𝜆𝑘𝐵𝑇 − 1
Black Body Photon Density
Spectrum
𝑛𝐵𝑏 =2𝑐
𝜆4
1
𝑒ℎ𝑐
𝜆𝑘𝐵𝑇 − 1
𝐼𝑆𝐶
𝐼𝑚
𝑉𝑂𝐶 𝑉𝑚
𝐹𝐹 =𝐼𝑚𝑉𝑚
𝐼𝑆𝐶𝑉𝑂𝐶
PV Cell Fill Factor
Physical Sciences Inc.
Model with Ideal Selective Emitter
Prad = emitter spectrum x
blackbody power
spectrum
Pout = emitter spectrum x
blackbody photon
density (norm) x EQE
hTPV = magenta area / cyan
area
VG14-148 -4
Only emits where EQE of TPV cell is near unity
Model predicts hTPV = 39.2% at 1300 K
– 475% increase in efficiency compared to black-body radiation
– Want actual emitter to approximate this ideal emitter
Physical Sciences Inc.
Metamaterial emitter consists of
a thin-film Pt cross above a Pt
backplane
– Sapphire substrate, Al2O3 spacer
– Al2O3 and Pt:
• Stable in atmosphere
• Matched CTE up to ~ 1500 K
Used Lumerical FDTD to
determine geometric parameters:
– Spacer (h ≈ 90 nm)
– Pt cross (t ≈ 45 nm)
– p ≈ 550 nm, w ≈ 275 nm, l ≈ 200 nm
Fabricated via e-beam
lithography + e-beam
evaporation
Selective Emitter Design
Pt
Al203 h
t
p
h
w
l
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -5
Physical Sciences Inc.
Fabricated Structures
Fabrication procedure Optical image of
Fabricated Structure
– Higher order absorption
resonances give each array
distinct color
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -6
400 nm p 600 nm
25
0 n
m
w 3
00
nm
150 nm l 250 nm
500 𝜇𝑚
Sapphire Wafer
E-beam evaporate
Pt and Al2O3
Spin lift-off resist
and e-beam resist
Develop
e-beam resist
Undercut
lift-off resist
Deposit Pt
Write pattern
Remove resists
Physical Sciences Inc.
Fabricated Structures
Fabrication procedure SEM image of
Fabricated Structure
– SEM has resolution of ~ 20 nm
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -7
Sapphire Wafer
E-beam evaporate
Pt and Al2O3
Spin lift-off resist
and e-beam resist
Develop
e-beam resist
Undercut
lift-off resist
Deposit Pt
Write pattern
Remove resists
Physical Sciences Inc.
Thermal Testing at 1300 K
SEM Images
Heat sample in RTA in 1 atm of Argon, hold for 2 min
Pt/AlO thin films survive (no delamination)
Metal pattern on surface deforms
– Due to interfacial stress
Before Heating After Heating
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -8
Physical Sciences Inc.
Thermal Testing at 1300 K
Optical Images
Heat sample in RTA in 1 atm of Argon, hold for 2 min
Before Heating After Heating
Visible frequency color change indicates morphological pattern
change
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -9
Physical Sciences Inc.
Spectral Emission
after Heating at 1300K
Spectral shift happens in first 2 minutes then remains static
through additional heating cycles
Could redesign emitter to optimize post-anneal geometry
– Lose some tuning parameters (cross to square shape)
– Absorption feature narrows (not good for matching TPV EQE)
Heat cycle at 1300 K 2 min cycle
10 min cycle
Pre-heat cycle
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -10
Physical Sciences Inc.
Emitter Stabilization
Use encapsulation to stabilize
cross pattern
Deposit ~150 nm of Al2O3 using
Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD)
on top of structure
– ALD chosen because it is more
conformal than sputtering
– Encapsulating material same as
dielectric spacer
• more thermally stable
configuration for micro-structures
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -11
500 nm
Pre-thermal cycling
Post-thermal cycling
Physical Sciences Inc.
Emitter Encapsulation
Optical Images
Before
heating
After 2 min
at 1000°C
After 2 + 5 min
heating cycles
After 2+5+5 min
heating cycles
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -12
Physical Sciences Inc.
Encapsulated Emitter
Thermal testing at 1300 K
Minimal spectral
effect due to heating
– Slight shift in
spectrum in first
heating cycle
• Densification of
Al2O3
– Remains constant
through 2, 5, 5 minute
thermal cycles
VG14-148 -13
Encapsulation layer broadens resonance
What is the expected TPV power and efficiency using this emitter?
Heat cycle at 1300 K
2 + 5 + 5 min cycles
2 min cycle
Pre-heat cycle
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
Physical Sciences Inc.
Selective Emitter Predicted Performance
Selective emitter boosts
TPV conversion efficiency
to 22% at 1300 K
from 8.5% with no
selective emitter
1.2 W/cm2 out
27% at 1500 K
3 W/cm2 out
With cold side filter,
efficiency can be
improved to ~40%
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -14
Physical Sciences Inc.
Selective Emitter Predicted Performance
Selective emitter boosts
TPV conversion efficiency
to 22% at 1300 K
from 8.5% with no
selective emitter
1.2 W/cm2 out
27% at 1500 K
3 W/cm2 out
With cold side filter,
efficiency can be
improved to ~40%
Woolf et al., APL105, 081110
VG14-148 -15
Minimal benefit from using more
exotic TPV materials due to
worsening dark current, EQE
Physical Sciences Inc.
E-beam lithography is not scalable
– Nano-imprint, interference lithography
• Not mature
– Stepper projection lithography
• Commercially viable
Fabrication steps using deep UV stepper photolithography
Large-area Emitter Fabrication
Prepared Substrate
Spin on Antireflection + Photoresist
UV expose
DevelopDeposit MetalLift Off
Mask
– Resolution limit ~ 200nm
– compared to ~20nm resolution
for e-beam used in P1 base
Need to verify that performance
still okay with 10x resolution
VG14-148 -16
Physical Sciences Inc.
Large-area Fabrication via Stepper Lithography
330nm
Pt
Al203
600 nm
VG14-148 -17
Preliminary demonstration of
large-area fabrication using
conventional lithography
methods
Puck geometry can produce
spectra equivalent to cross
geometry spectra
Physical Sciences Inc.
Conclusions and Outlook
Fabricated a heterogeneous metasurface capable of surviving
repeated temperature cycling to 1300 K
Measured metasurface reflectivity, used to estimate thermal-to-
electrical energy conversion efficiency
Demonstrated large scale fabrication using conventional
lithography
Suitable for TPV or Solar TPV applications
TPV is rapidly maturing due to innovations in high-temperature
emitters
– Applications in remote energy generation and combined heat and power
VG14-148 -18
Physical
Sciences Inc.
Physical Sciences Inc. 20 New England Business Center Andover, MA 01810
Thank you.
Questions?
VG14-148
-
19
Physical
Sciences Inc.
Physical Sciences Inc. 20 New England Business Center Andover, MA 01810
Backup Slides
VG14-148
-
20
Physical Sciences Inc.
What We Do
Applied research and development for all major
agencies of the U.S. government
– ~ 60% FY 10 revenue
Technology transition and product development for
government and industrial customers
– ~ 15% FY 10 revenue
Pre-production manufacturing process development
– ~ 5% FY 10 revenue
Components, systems, and instrumentation for
industry and government sales
– ~20% FY 10 revenue
Technology and product licensing to strategic
partners and spin-outs for high-volume commercial
markets
– ~ 2% FY 10 revenue from royalties
VG14-148 -21
Physical Sciences Inc.
TPV Converter Cell Model Concept
𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑑
Heat Source
Radiated power from combustion
Selective Emitter
Reradiated power
Reflected power
Below bandgap absorption
Reradiated power
TPV cell Generated
power
𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡
>BG
<BG
Electrical Losses
Not included in model:
– Temperature rise of TPV
(assume perfect heatsinking)
– Above bandgap thermalization
– Below bandgap absorption
– Electrical losses
Goal of TPV model is to calculate:
– Electrical output power: 𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡
– TPV efficiency: 𝜂𝑇𝑃𝑉 =𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡
𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑑
– TPV spectral efficiency: 𝜂𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐 =𝑁𝑎𝑏𝑠
𝑁𝑟𝑎𝑑
VG14-148 -22
Physical Sciences Inc.
Experimental Results - Fabrication
Fabrication process SEM Image
Sapphire Wafer
E-beam evaporate
Pt and Al2O3
Spin lift-off resist
and e-beam
photoresist
Develop
e-beam photoresist
Undercut
lift-off resist
Deposit Pt
Write pattern
Remove resists
using acetone
Physical Sciences Inc.
Motivation
Need a higher energy-density source for remote energy
generation
Combined heat and power (CHP) potential.
10% total efficiency TPV beats battery by factor
0.1
1
10
100
1000
0.288 0.875
26.4 44.4 48 53.6 142
Energy Density (MJ/kg)
VG14-148 -24
Physical Sciences Inc.
1 2 3 4 5
VG14-148 -25
Physical Sciences Inc.
6 7 8 9 10
VG14-148 -26
Physical Sciences Inc.
11 12 13 14 15
VG14-148 -27
Physical Sciences Inc.
16 17 18 19 20
VG14-148 -28
Physical Sciences Inc.
23 21 22 24 25
VG14-148 -29
Physical Sciences Inc.
Experiments vs Theory
Measurements taken using FTIR
– Unity absorption
on resonance
– FWHM ~ 1um
– Tunable
– Matches
simulations
Physical Sciences Inc.
Acknowledgements
Team
PSI
Dr. David Woolf
Dr. Joel Hensley
Sandia
Dr. Eric Shaner
Dr. Jeff Cederberg
Albert Grine
Don Bethke
Funding
ONR N00014-13-P-1190
VG14-148 -31