high flow vv ecmo vs ecco2r in severe ards toronto 2019.pdfhigh flow vv ecmo vs ecco 2 r in severe...
TRANSCRIPT
High flow VV ECMO vs
ECCO2R in severe ARDS
2019, Toronto
Luciano Gattinoni, MD, FRCP
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Germany
Emeritus, Università di Milano
OXYGENATIONFiO2 =1.0 250 mL min-1
CO2 REMOVALVA 9500 mL min-1
VO2
250mL min-1
VCO2
200mL min-1
Sata 98%
PaO2 110 mmHg
CO2 cont 34 mL
PaCO2 15 mmHg
Hb 15 gSatv 82%PvO2 47 mmHgCO2 cont 52 mLPvCO2 43 mmHg
7000 mL min-1
PBF
1100 mL min-1
PBF
Gattinoni et al., European Advances in Intensive Care, 1983; 21: 97-117
CaO2 = CcO2 x (1- Qs/Qtlung x Qs/QtECMO)+CvO2 x (Qs/Qtlung x Qs/QtECMO)
Body Tissues
Natural Lung
O2 natural lung
VO2
Artificial Lung
O2 ECMO
Qs/Qt lungQs/Qt ECMO
CaO2CvO2
ECMO trials
Trial nMortality(control)
Mortality(intervention)
p
Zapol (1979) 90 90% 92% 0.8
Morris (1994) 40 58% 67% 0.8
Peek (2009) 180 46% 37% 0.07
Combes (2018) 249 46% 35% 0.09
Mortality in ECMO trials
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
intervention
control
years
mortality
ECMO does not kill !!!
OXYGENATION
NIH ADULT ECMO TRIAL:ZAPOL et al.1979, JAMA • PaO2 < 50 mmHg (2 hours) FiO2
1and PEEP 5 (fast entry)
• PaO2 < 50 (12 hour) FiO2 0.6 and PEEP 5 or a Qs/Qt>30 FiO2 1 and 5 PEEP
PCIRV vs ECCO2R :MORRIS et al. 1994, Am J Respir Crit Care Med
CESAR trialPeek et al. 2009,Lancet
Murray score > 2.5
EOLIA trial
Combes et al. 2018, NEJM
• P/F<50 for at least 3 hours
• P/F<80 for at least 6 hours
• Arterial pH<7.25 with aPCO2> 60 mmHg for at least 6 hours
Shunt
HighVA/Q
LowVA/Q
Gas exchange = VA/Q ratio
Vasoconstriction Endothelial Swelling
or Obstruction
+Vasoconstriction
SwellingVasoconstriction
Endothelial Swellingor Obstruction
+
Collapse
Vasoconstriction Endothelial Swelling
or Obstruction Collapse
+
+Obstruction
Anatomical shunt compartment
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
100
200
300
400
PaO
2/F
IO2
(mm
Hg
)
Cressoni M. et al. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):669-75.
Hypoxic vasoconstriction
30
50
70
90
110
130
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
10.5
2
10.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
30
50
70
90
110
130
Shunt
VE
(L/m
in)
PaO2 (mmHg) PaCO2 (mmHg)
0 1 2 3 ECBF (L/min)
VO2 200 ml/min
VCO2 tot 200 ml/min
FiO2 NL 0,6
FiO2 ML 1
CO 6 L/min
Vd/Vt 0,6
Qs/QT 0,4
0 150 180 190
VCO2 ML
ECMO helper Hypoxic vasoconstriction and shunt
0 1 2 3
VE (L/min)
Rescue VILI
prevention
=
Maintain life
(lowest price
until…)
Clinical indications
Oxygenation
(ARDS)
Hyperinflation
(Asthma, COPD)
Pre-ECMO
baselineUsual ECMO
ELSO
recommendation
Physiology-based
limits
Vt/IBW
(mL/kg) 6 4 3.5apneic oxygenation
+ 3.6 (sighs)
PEEP
(cmH2O) 13.5 12.0 15.0 22.0Driving pressure
(cmH2O) 17.0 13.5 10.0 10.0Plateau pressure
(cmH2O) 30.5 25.5 25.0 32.0RR
(bpm) 22 16 5 2Mechanical power
(J/min)* 22.7 8.4 2.4 1.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50 100 150 200 250
VE
(L/m
in)
ECCO2R tot (mL/min)
100
200
300
400
n = 8 pigs
Blood flow(mL/min)
R2 = 0,5
Minimally invasiveECCO2R
Duscio et al. CCM, 2018
Minimally invasiveECCO2R
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
ECC
O2R
(%
)
100200300400
n = 8 pigs
Duscio et al. CCM, 2018
Blood flow(mL/min)
R2 = 0,6
VCO2 tot (mL/min)
Real question
The best for healing:
• Complete rest with total lung collapse?
• Whatever in between
• Complete rest with total lung inflation?
Near-apneic ventilation decreases lung injury and fibroproliferation in an ARDS model with ECMO
Near-apneicVentilation
PEEP 10Vt 6 mL/KgRR 5DP 10Power 0.4-0.5 J/min
Distant organ failure(Kidney, Liver)
J Araos et al AJRCCM 2019
PEEP 5Vt 10 mL/KgRR 20DP 21-24Power 11-13 J/min
Non-ProtectiveVentilation
ConventionalProtective
PEEP 10Vt 6 mL/KgRR 20DP 14-15Power 7-8 J/min
Courtesy of Dr. Camporota
Histology Score Myofibroblasts Collagen
Near-apnoeic ventilation decreases lung injury and fibroproliferation in an ARDS model with ECMO
J Araos et al AJRCCM 2019Courtesy of Dr. Camporota
lung Rest Or reduced Mechanical ventilation in ECMO
- ROMEO Trial -
ECMO patients
MovementLung rest
OUTCOME time on bypass [∆ 20%]
POPULATION
TREATMENT