hidden order and dynamics of susy vbs models...hidden order and dynamics of susy vbs models keisuke...
TRANSCRIPT
Hidden Order and Dynamics of SUSY VBS models
Keisuke Totsuka Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University
Kazuki Hasebe Takuma National College of Technology
29/10/2010 “New development of numerical simulations in low-dimensional quantum systems” @ YITP
Refs: D. Arovas, KH, X-L.Qi and S-C. Zhang, Phys.Rev.B 79, 224404 (2009) KH and KT, preprint (2010) and in preparation
Outline
IntroductionValence-Bond Solid (VBS) model(s)
definition, matrix product & analogiesHidden (string) order
Supersymmetric VBS stateHoles in VBS statesAnalogies (FQHE, BCS) & hidden orderLow-lying excitation (SMA)Some generalizations
Summary
Introduction
VBS model ... a paradigmatic model for spin-gap ststems in 1D
generalization to other groups: SU(n), SO(n), ...
What about adding “holes” to VBS model ?✓a single spin-0 hole ... an exact eigenstate
for a t-J-like model (S=1 VBS background)
✓a single spin-1/2 hole ... a model for Y2BaNiO5
Model with many holes??Hidden order (robust against hole) ? Excitation?Possible future generalizations??
Zhang-Arovas ’89
Penc-Shiba ’95
Tu-Zhang-Xiang ’08, etc.
Valence-bond solid (VBS) states
Valence-bond solid modelsClass of models for which short-range valence-bondcrystals are (rigorous) ground states
Majumdar-Ghosh model (S=1/2 J1-J2 chain with J2/J1=1/2)
2D Shastry-Sutherland model, and many more...
Soluble models which realize Haldane’s scenario:HS=1 =
�
i
�Si·Si+1 +
13
(Si·Si+1)2 +
23
�
HS=2 =�
i
�Si·Si+1 +
29
(Si·Si+1)2 +
163
(Si·Si+1)3 +
107
�
HS=3 =�
i
�Si·Si+1 +
59358
(Si·Si+1)2 +
191611
(Si·Si+1)3 +
13222
(Si·Si+1)4 +
396179
�
Affleck et al ’88, Arovas et al. ’88
Majumdar-Ghosh state: a “Kekule” structure
Valence-bond solid models(Many) important features:✓short-range spin correlation:
✓ “Haldane gap” to triplon excitation
✓edge states & (exact) degeneracy in a finite open system
✓Hidden order
Arovas et al. ’88, Freitag-Müller-Hartmann ’91
�Szi Sz
j � =
(S+1)2
3
�− S
S+2
�|j−i|for i �= j
S(S+1)3 for i = j
Spin Gap (SMA) Approximation
1 2027 → 7.41× 10−1
2 15 → 2.00× 10−1
3 2646265 → 4.21× 10−2
4 71590318 → 7.92× 10−3
5 884634711 → 1.39× 10−3
6 2826251203274644 → 2.35× 10−4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
10 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
spin
gap
KT-Suzuki ’95
Supersymmetric VBS states
A quick look at supersymmetry... Schwinger boson construction of SU(2)
Generators (“spin”):commutation relations:
Schwinger-boson representation:
Label for irreps. = “boson number” = spin “S”
{Sx , Sy , Sz}
[Sa , Sb] = i �abc Sc
a†a + b†b = 2S
S+ = a†b , S− = b†a , Sz = (a†a− b†b)/2 (a†a + b†b = 2S)
|S;m� =1�
(S + m)!(S −m)!(a†)S+m(b†)S−m|0�
A quick look at supersymmetry ...Schwinger operator construction of UOSp(1|2)
5 Generators & 3 Schwinger op.✓ Generators-(i) (“bosonic” = spin):✓ Generators-(ii) (“fermionic”):
commutation relations:
Label of irreps.
two SU(2) irreps:
{Sx , Sy , Sz}
K1=12(x−1fa† + xf†b) , K2=
12(x−1fb† − xf†a)
[Sa , Sb]=i �abcSc , [Sa , Kµ] =12(σa)νµKν
{Kµ , Kν} =12(iσyσa)µνSa
S = L (nf = 0) , S = L−1/2 (nf = 1)
na + nb + nf = 2L (∈ Z) spin-1 state
1-hole (S=1/2) state
L=1
(a† , b† , f†)
SUSY VBS state... construction
prepare two (super)spin-1/2s on each site:
“Physical” state @site = superspin-1Schwinger-op rep. :“spin-1” or “1-hole(S=1/2)”
Form “entangled pairs”:
SUSY-VBS state:
a†jaj + b†jbj + f†j fj = 2L = 2
(a†jb†j+1−b†ja
†j+1−r f†
j f†j+1)
Def |sVBS� =�
j
(a†jb†j+1 − b†ja
†j+1 − r f†
j f†j+1)|0� (r ≡ x2 ∈ R)
spin-↑ spin-↓ hole
☞ super-qubit... L=1/2(spin-↑, spin-↓, hole) ⇔ (a† , b† , f†)
SUSY VBS state... Physical picture
Schwinger-op. rep. :
expansion w.r.t. “r”:lowest-order in “r”... S=1 VBS state
highest-order in “r”... S=1/2 Majumdar-Ghosh
r→0: VBS, r→∞: MG
a†jaj + b†jbj + f†j fj = 2L = 2
Def |sVBS� =�
j
(a†jb†j+1 − b†ja
†j+1 − r f†
j f†j+1)|0� (r ≡ x2 ∈ R)
spin-↑ spin-↓ hole
SUSY VBS state ... Parent Hamiltonian
usual VBS (S=1):valence-bond = “SU(2) singlet”:addition of angular-momenta:
Projection operator:
SUSY VBS:valence-bond = “UOSp(1|2) singlet”:addition of angular momenta:
Projection operator:
(a†jb†j+1−b†ja
†j+1)
1⊗ 1 � 0⊕ 1⊕ 2
(a†jb†j+1−b†ja
†j+1−rf†
j f†j+1)
(L = 1)⊗ (L = 1) � (0)⊕ (1/2)⊕ (1)⊕ (3/2)⊕ (2)
V3/2(P†3/2P3/2) + V2(P †
2 P2) (V3/2, V2 > 0)
hlocal = V2 P2 =V2
2
�Si·Si+1 +
13
(Si·Si+1)2 +
23
�
cf) Klein model ’82
Analogy to FQHE
✓coherent state w.f.
✓projection to J≧S+1 state
VBS models
HVBS =2S�
J=S+1
VJPJ(Sj ·Sj+1)
✓spin-hole coherent state w.f.✓projection to Ltot ≧ L+1/2
state
SUSY VBS models
✓Laughlin w.f. on sphere
✓two-particle int:
FQHE (Laughlin w.f.)
�
i<j
(uivj − viuj)m
H =�
i<j
�
J>2L−m
VJ PJ(i, j)
✓SUSY Laughlin w.f.
✓projection to J>2L-m state ... exact G.S.
SUSY FQHE (Laughlin w.f.)
�
j
(ujvj+1 − vjuj+1)S
Arovas et al ’88
Haldane ’83
Matrix-product representation... SUSY VBS states
Schwinger-op. rep. :Matrix-product representation:
size = number of (L/R) edge states (up, down & 1-hole...3)KEY: “valence-bond insertion” = “matrix multiplication”
gj =
−a†jb
†j −(a†j)
2 −√
ra†jf†j
(b†j)2 a†jb
†j
√rb†jf
†j
−√
rf†j b†j −
√rf†
j a†j 0
g†j =
−ajbj (bj)2 −
√rbjfj
−(aj)2 ajbj −√
rajfj
−√
rfjaj√
rfjbj 0
|sVBS� =�
j
(a†jb†j+1−b†ja
†j+1−r f†
j f†j+1)|0�
g1 ⊗ g2 ⊗ · · ·⊗ gL⊗gL+1
|sVBS� =
�g1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ gj ⊗ · · · gL . . . for open chain
STr [g1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ gj ⊗ · · · gL] . . . for periodic chain
Fannes et al. ’92,93
hole↓ ↑
hole
↑↓
⇧Left
⇦Right
Correlation functions (i) ...spin-spin correlation functions
“transfer-matrix” formalism:
spin-spin correlation function:
Correlation length:9 edge states((2L+1)2, in general)
Klümper et al ’92, KT-Suzuki ’94-95, etc..
Arovas et al. ’09
�Sαi Sα
j � =
2(r2+√
8r2+9+3)√8r2+9(
√8r2+9+3) for i = j
13r2+24+(r2+8)√
8r2+9
2√
8r2+9(√
8r2+9+3)
�− 2√
8r2+9+3
�|j−i|for i �= j
“edge states”
0 5 10 15 20
!0.5
0.0
0.5
site-j
hole
�sVBS|sVBS� = GL ,
�sVBS|OAx O
By |sVBS� = Gx−1G(OA)Gy−x−1G(OB)GL−y
Ga,a;b,b ≡ g∗(a, b)g(a, b) , G(OA)a,a;b,b ≡ g∗(a, b)OA g(a, b)
Correlation functions (ii) ...”superconducting” correlation
Possible “hole pairing”...
Need to modify “transfer-matrix” formalism:
Order parameter for “hole pairing”: Arovas et al. ’09
S=1 VBS
S=1/2 MG�∆j� =
�(ajbj+1 − bjaj+1)f†
j f†j+1
�
=144r
�r2 + 3 +
√8r2 + 9
�
√8r2 + 9
�3 +
√8r2 + 9
�2 �5 +
√8r2 + 9
�
(ajbj+1 − bjaj+1)f†j f†
j+1
�sVBS|sVBS� = GL ,
�sVBS|OAx O
By |sVBS� = Gx−1G(OA) �Gy−x−1G(OB)GL−y
�Ga,a;b,b ≡ g∗(a, b)(−1)F g(a, b) , G(OA)a,a;b,b ≡ g∗(a, b)OA g(a, b)
1 2 3 j
Analogy ... BCS wavefunction
BCS wavefunction:
gk=0: (trivial) vacuum0< gk <∞: superconducting gk=∞: filled Fermi sphere (normal state)
SUSY VBS state:
“vacuum” = spin-1 VBS stater=0: pure VBS state0<r<∞: “hole-pair condensate”r=∞: Majumdar-Ghosh state
electron pair
hole pair|sVBS� =
�
j
(a†jb†j+1 − b†ja
†j+1 − r f†
j f†j+1)|0� (r ≡ x2 ∈ R)
|ΨBCS� =�
k
(1 + gkc†k,↑c†−k,↓)|0�
Hidden Order... (usual) VBS state
Order in VBS state:No ordinary (local) magnetic LRO, no dimerization...But there is “hidden” order (“string order”)
How to detect ?Néel order:VBS:
den Nijs-Rommelse ’89, Tasaki ’91Pérez-García et al ’08
Oshikawa ’92, KT-Suzuki ’95
S=2
Szj (−1)nSz
j+n ⇒ ferro
Girvin-Arovas ’90
cf) Gu-Wen ’09
Ozstring = lim
n�∞�sVBS|Sj exp
iπj+n−1�
k=j
Szk
Szj+n|sVBS�
Hidden Order... SUSY VBS state
“string order” in SUSY VBS ?matrix-product rep. ⇒ ”almost” flat surface
string order parameter captures hidden order...
gj =
−a†jb
†j −(a†j)
2 −√
ra†jf†j
(b†j)2 a†jb
†j
√rb†jf
†j
−√
rf†j b†j −
√rf†
j a†j 0
k�
j=1
gj =
|Sz
tot=0� |Sztot= + 1� |Sz
tot= + 1/2�|Sz
tot=− 1� |Sztot=0� |Sz
tot=− 1/2�|Sz
tot=− 1/2� |Sztot= + 1/2� |Sz
tot=0�
Sztot ≡
k�
j=1
Szj
-1 0
Ozstring = �sVBS|Sj exp
iπj+n−1�
k=j
Szk
Szj+n|sVBS�
S=1 VBS
“S”=1 sVBS
Low-lying excitations ...“spin”
Failure of “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis” like excitation = want for alternative way to physical excitations
triplon = “crackion”
single-mode approximation:
Fáth-Sólyom ’93, KT-Suzuki ’94-95, Rommer-Östlund ‘95,’97
Szj |sVBS� =
12
�−|ψ(0)
j−1�+ |ψ(0)j �
�
ωzSMA(k) = −
12�sVBS| [[H, Sz(k)], Sz(−k)] |sVBS�
�sVBS|Sz(k)Sz(−k)|sVBS�
=�ψ(0)(k)|H|ψ(0)(k)��ψ(0)(k)|ψ(0)(k)�
=12
(1 − cos k)Szz(k)
�ψ(0)x |hx,x+1|ψ
(0)x �
SUSY valence bond
triplet bond
Low-lying excitations ...“hole”
In SUSY, we have two more (fermionic) generators
“charege-crackion” = “spinon-hole pair”
can be treated by MPS, toolack of unitary operationconnecting “spin” and “charge” ➡ different spectra ...
SUSY valence bond
spinon-hole pair
0.0
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
1
2
3
K1(j) =12
�1√ra†jfj +
√rf†
j bj
�, K2(j) =
12
�1√rb†jfj −
√rf†
j aj
�
K1,j |sVBS� =12√
r�
|ψ(1/2)j−1 � − |ψ(1/2)
j ��
Generalizations
On Square Lattice...
model-I: 1-species of fermion
model-II: 3-species of fermion
=
|Ψ2D-(I)sVBS � =
�
�i,j�
(a†i b†j−b†ia
†j−r f†
i f†j )|0�
|Ψ2D-(II)sVBS � =
�
�i,j�
(a†i b†j−b†ia
†j−r1 f†
i f†j−r3 g†i g
†j−r3 h†
ih†j)|0�
r1,r2,r3→∞−−−−−−−−→�
all possible dimer coverings
Rokhsar-Kivelson RVB liquid Rokhsar-Kivelson ’88
+ ... +
More fermions...
Case with two species of holes (1D)...
Matrix-product rep.:
Matrix-product formalism:finite string ordersymmetric behavior w.r.t. “r”
|sVBS� =�
j
�a†jb
†j+1−b†ja
†j+1−r(f†
j f†j+1 + h†
jh†j+1)
�|0�
gj =
−a†jb†j −(a†j)
2 −√
ra†jf†j −
√ra†jh
†j
(b†j)2 a†jb
†j
√rb†jf
†j
√rb†jh
†j
−√
rh†jb
†j −
√rh†
ja†j −rh†
jf†j 0
−√
rf†j b†j −
√rf†
j a†j 0 −rf†j h†
j
|0�j
Summary
SU(2) -> UOSp(1|2) generalization of VBS model(s)✓ “spin-L” or “spin-(L-1/2)+one (spin-1/2) hole”
Matrix-product representation in terms of (2L+1)×(2L+1) matrix:
✓ short-range spin-spin cor., finite hole-pairing correlation✓ hidden string order (symmetry-protected phase ?)✓ single-mode approx. ⇒ gapped magnetic excitations
Generalizations:
✓ 2D case ⇒ relation to Rokhsar-Kivelson point...
✓ physics of QDM, topological order ??
(a†jb†j+1−b†ja
†j+1) ⇒ (a†jb
†j+1−b†ja
†j+1−rf†
j f†j+1)