herodicus-24grammata
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Herodicus-24grammata](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100523/553098164a7959f7328b47da/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Abstract Herodicus (fifth century BC) is the first
person in the history of medicine who actually com-
bined sports with medicine. He used to be a sports
teacher, who later studied medicine and managed to
succeed Euryphon in the medical school of Cnidos, one
of the most prominent in ancient Greece together with
its neighbor medical school of Cos (Hippocrates’
home). In Cnidos Herodicus formed his own theoreti-
cal perspective of medicine. He considered, namely,
bad health to be the result of imbalance between diet
and physical activity and for this reason he recom-
mended strict diet, constant physical activity and reg-
ular training. He believed that this combination was
the ideal way to maintain good standards of health and
he applied this type of treatment method to his pa-
tients. Unfortunately, Herodicus’ works are lost today.
However, excerpts of his medical system, which can be
traced in ancient texts, support the fact that Herodicus
can be considered as the father of sports medicine.
Keywords Sports medicine Æ History of medicine ÆPhysical activity Æ Herodicus Æ Training Æ Diet
Introduction
Herodicus, a Greek physician lived and practiced
medicine in the fifth century BC. However, it seems that
there are two men, both doctors who have been living
in the same period in the extended region of ancient
Greece, that bear the name ‘‘Herodicus’’. The exis-
tence of the second one became known only in 1893
when the codex Anonymus Londiensis, which included
the first history of medicine, was found and published
[7]. In this text, a ‘‘Herodicus of Selymbria’’ (Anony-
mus Londiensis: 9.20) and a ‘‘Herodicus of Cnidos’’
(Anonymus Londiensis: 4.40) are mentioned one after
the other. This is the reason that some scholars be-
lieved that actually there were two different men.
Nevertheless, a more careful examination of the
information that codex Anonymus Londiensis and
other ancient sources, can lead us to the conclusion
that they refer to one and the same person. Firstly,
these two Herodicus were not only contemporaries,
but also shared the same medical theories. More spe-
cifically, they both recognized that the primary cause of
diseases is the lack of balance between movement and
nutrition. Moreover, according to the medieval lexicon
of Suda, ‘‘Herodicus of Selymbria’’ was the teacher of
Hippocrates (Hippocrates, doctor from Cos... his first
teacher was his father and after him Herodicus of
A. D. Georgoulis Æ I.-S. Kiapidou Æ L. VelogianniOrthopaedic Sports Medicine Center of Ioannina,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,University of Ioannina, P.O.BOX 1330,Ioannina 45110, Greece
N. StergiouHPER Biomechanics Laboratory,University of Nebraska at Omaha,Omaha, NE 68182, USA
A. BolandMassachusetts General Hospital,Sports Medicine/Shoulder Service,Yawkey Center 3G, Suite 3200, 55 Fruit Street,Boston, MA 02114, USA
A. D. Georgoulis (&)P.O. BOX 1330, Ioannina 45110, Greecee-mail: [email protected]
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2007) 15:315–318
DOI 10.1007/s00167-006-0149-z
123
SPORTS MEDICINE
Herodicus, the father of sports medicine
Anastasios D. Georgoulis Æ Irini-Sofia Kiapidou ÆLamprini Velogianni Æ Nicholas Stergiou ÆArthur Boland
Received: 17 March 2006 / Accepted: 23 March 2006 / Published online: 2 September 2006� Springer-Verlag 2006
![Page 2: Herodicus-24grammata](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100523/553098164a7959f7328b47da/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Selymbria...) [1]. Despite the fact that modern scholars
disagree on the truth of this statement (most of them
accept it as it is given [8, 10, 12, 14, 18, 21], but there
are those who react with skepticism [5]), there is
obviously a connection between Hippocrates and He-
rodicus, since central hippocratic doctrines can be
found in Herodicus’ claims. At the same time, it is
known that Hippocrates spent a few years in Cnidos
before he started his career in Cos. This can be an
additional argument for recognizing that the two He-
rodicus are actually one.
Among the medical schools which existed in ancient
Greece during the time of Hippocrates, those of Cni-
dos and Cos were the most prominent [11, 13, 24].
Cnidos was a colony of the Spartans (the residents of
the ancient Greek city of Sparta from southern
Greece) and an important port situated in the penin-
sula of Caria in the south-east part of Asia Minor,
opposite to the island of Cos. On this passage between
the Middle East and ancient Greece, Euryphon foun-
ded the first important medical school and began a
tradition of medicine separating it from magic and
mythology.
The cities of Cnidos and Cos were politically con-
nected to the city-band of Exapolis and together with
other cities in the area had as political and cultural
center the Temple of Apollo near to Cnidos [16]. The
myth says that after the fall of Troy Asclepius’ son
Podaleirios moved to the peninsula of Caria, where he
married a local princess and set a new city named
Syrnos. Eventually his descendants, the Asclepiads, left
this city and went either to Cnidos or to the island of
Cos, where they passed the medical education from
father to son. Among the Asclepiads of both cities was
an obvious connection and this is an additional argu-
ment for the existence of close communication be-
tween Cnidos and Cos [15].
Collaboration and exchange of ideas, in parallel of
course with scientific competition, can be traced in the
relationship between the two nearby medical institu-
tions. Despite the fact that doctrines of these two
schools show more similarities than differences, there
are some significant odds. The physicians of Cnidos
gave great importance in taking the medical history of
the patient and they also developed the process of
differential diagnosis. In their descriptions of diseases,
they were the first to differentiate the areas of symp-
tomatology, aetiology, therapy, and prognosis. Unfor-
tunately, only fragments are known today of these
medical theories.
There is no doubt, however, that the great person-
ality of Hippocrates shadowed both schools. This
is why remarkable doctors such as Euryphon and
Herodicus are rarely noticed by current scholars, al-
though according to Sigerist [23], both these two heads
of the school of Cnidos were outstanding physicians
beyond any doubt.
Short biography
Herodicus appears to have been born in the fifth cen-
tury BC in Selymbria of Thrace. The fact that this city
was an old colony of Megara, situated on the north
shore of the see of Marmara, is responsible for his
name ‘‘Megareus’’ (of Megara) in Greek documents
(Platon, Protagoras [3], 316.d.9–316.e.1: Herodicus of
Selymbria, primarily of Megara, who is still alive [It
means contemporary with Protagoras and Socrates,
whose discussion recreates Platon] and a great sophist).
Later, he studied and worked as a doctor-physician and
dietician in Selymbria, in Megara, and other cities of
ancient Greece, such as Athens. In addition, he was
educated as a physical educator, which allowed him to
better understand the role of exercise and balanced
diet in medicine. Considering the fact that during his
time physical educators did not allow physicians to visit
the gymnasiums and as a result physicians did not
understand the world of sports, Herodicus had the
unique chance to combine both areas: sports and
medicine. He was effective in this endeavor and he
formulated his own theoretical perspective of medicine
which he applied to his patients. Given the fact that
they, as warriors who often participated to battles,
were interested in keeping a good physical shape,
welcomed Herodicus’ strict principles and discipline
approach to health. Herodicus emphasized the rela-
tionship between sports and health and he even lived
by example as we will see below.
His theoretical perspective
The founder of the school of Cnidos, Euryphon was the
first to believe that diet has an important role in health
[7]. According to him, the excrements which arise in
abdomen after bad digestion are spread through the
body, they reach the brain and eventually result in
illness. On the contrary, when the abdomen is empty,
the digestive system works properly and people enjoy
good health (Anonymus Londinensis: 4.31–40) [9].
Influenced by this hypothesis, Herodicus formulated
his own theoretical perspective (Fig. 1). He believed
that food products are not correctly digested when
people consume food without corresponding motion.
Incorrect digestion can result to byproducts which
316 Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2007) 15:315–318
123
![Page 3: Herodicus-24grammata](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100523/553098164a7959f7328b47da/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
generate two types of ‘‘bodily liquids’’: a sharp and a
bitter. The type of disease that results depends first on
the dominance of one bodily liquid over another (i.e.,
homeostatic imbalance) and secondly on location and
organ, where bodily liquids congregate. Namely, there
is a difference if the redundant bodily liquid is located
at the brain, the liver, or the spleen (Anonymus Lon-
dinensis 4.40–5.34) [9]. The sharp and bitter bodly
liquids are identical with the phlegm and bile, which
constantly in later medical theories are considered to
be pathogenic factors. Herodicus’ theory of ‘‘two
bodily liquids’’ belongs to the fundamental medical
doctrine from which the dominative ‘‘doctrine of four
bodily liquids’’ came. [19].
It is obvious that Herodicus attached great impor-
tance to physical activity. He declared that sufficient
physical activity and proper diet are vital to maintain
good standards of health (Anonymus Londinensis:
9.20–36.) [9]. The restoration of a natural life was
thought to be the basis for the healing of disease, which
appears only as a result of a wrong way of life. It is very
interesting to notice here that lack of physical activity
and improper diet, have been implicated with numer-
ous health problems in our present societies. Eventu-
ally Herodicus invented his own medical system, which
first of all included a strict diet, consisted of grains and
other foods generally regarded as unappetizing. His
medical theory embodied also exhaustive training as a
treatment method. Socrates in Platon’s Phaedros [2]
(227.d.2–5) admits that he was so pleased by the words
of his interlocutor, that even ‘‘if Phaedros took the
road to Megara, reached the city walls and turned
back, as Herodicus did, he would follow him’’.
According to the commentary of Hermias in this ab-
stract of Platon’s [6] (24.25–30) ‘‘Herodicus the doctor
used to train himself outside the city walls, starting
from a certain distance, not very far away, but sym-
metrical. He was walking till the walls and then
returning, and he did that many times’’.
However, Herodicus sometimes followed this line of
thinking to extremes and his instructions for a healthy
life were quite complex. Thus, some ancient authors
criticised him for being obsessive with his treatments.
For example, the writer of Epidemics [17] (: 6.3.18)
notes that ‘‘Herodicus have killed fever patients by
running exercises, many bouts of wrestling and vapour
baths.’’ Platon in Res Publica [4] (: 406.a.4–b.8) criti-
cizes also his method to mix gymnastic training with
medicine. It seems that the same opinion was shared by
Aristotle in Rhetorica [20] (: 1361b 4–6): ‘‘many men
are in good health, for example Herodicus, but no one
would congratulate them on their health, because they
abstain from all or most human pleasures.’’ However,
Herodicus persistency may be what separated him
from others.
Despite the negative criticism, Herodicus had
achieved significant results with his methodology. His
theoretical perspective was greatly influenced from the
philosophy of Pythagoras, but no one can verify today
if Herodicus was actually a student of Pythagoras; text
tradition of ancient sources is disorderly and full of
gaps [22].
It is also obvious that his theory of the homeostasis
of the two liquids influenced later Hippocrates, who
developed the theory of the homeostasis of the four
liquids. Under this perspective one can says that He-
rodicus was a pioneer in setting the basis of the
explanative westernized medicine.
Conclusion
Herodicus was a sports medicine doctor, one of the
oldest of Cnidos’ medical school, who is known to us by
name. He combined his knowledge of physical educa-
tion and medicine to develop new treatments that
could benefit his patients. He formulated his own
medical theory and he applied his ideas to his patients.
His methodology is clearly relevant for our times since
we have finally realized the importance of physical
activity and proper diet to healthy living. He may be
the first doctor that suggested patients to get off their
Theory of Herodicus
Nutrition Imbalance Physical activity
Byproducts of bad Digestion
acute chronic
Sharp bodily liquid Bitter bodily liquid
Homeostatic imbalance
Congregation in Organs(Brain, liver, spleen etc)
Disease
Theory of Herodicus
Nutrition Imbalance Physical activity
Byproducts of bad Digestion
acute chronic
Sharp bodily liquid Bitter bodily liquid
Homeostatic imbalance
Congregation in Organs(Brain, liver, spleen etc)Congregation in Organs(Brain, liver, spleen etc)
DiseaseDisease
Fig. 1 Herodicus’ theoretical perspective
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2007) 15:315–318 317
123
![Page 4: Herodicus-24grammata](https://reader038.vdocuments.mx/reader038/viewer/2022100523/553098164a7959f7328b47da/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
beds and start moving after an injury. This is common
practice today since we try to minimize bed rest.
Everyone had to recognize the value of the treatises of
Herodicus. They were taken under consideration from
doctors of that time and the years after [19]. His theory
for the explanation of the diseases through the
homeostasis of the two liquids makes him a pioneer.
Unfortunately, his works are lost and only excerpts of
his theories and concepts can be traced today in an-
cient sources. There is no doubt, however, that Hero-
dicus influenced directly the medical history by
proposing the use of diet, training and physical activity.
He has set the basis not only of sports medicine, but of
all medicine in every field.
References
1. Adler A Suidae lexicon, v. I-IV, Leipzig 1928–1935 (repr.1967–1971)
2. Burnet J Platonis opera, v. II. Oxford 1901 (repr. 1967)3. Burnet J Platonis opera, v. III. Oxford 1903 (repr. 1968)4. Burnet J Platonis opera, v. IV, Oxford 1902 (repr. 1968)5. Cohen MR–Drabkin IE A source book in greek science,
Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1966, p 5036. Couvreur P., Hermeias von Alexandrien. In Platonis Phae-
drum scholia. Paris 1901 (repr. Hildesheim 1971)7. Dambasis IN (1966) Historikai Iatrikai Meletai Seira Proti,
Athens pp 259–2658. Deichgraber K (1932) Die arztliche Standesethik des hip-
pokratischen Eides, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte derNaturwissenschaften und der Medizin 3:162
9. Diels H, Anonymi Londinensis ex Aristotelis iatricisMenoniis et aliis medicis eclogue. Commentaria in Aristo-telem Graeca suppl. 3.1, Berlin 1893
10. Edelstein L (1987) Ancient Medicine. Selected papers ofLudwig Edelstein, Baltimore-London, p 138
11. Grensemann H (1975) Knidische Medizin. Teil I: Die Tes-timonien zur altesten knidischen Lehre und analyse knidi-scher Schriften im Corpus Hippocraticum, Berlin, New York
12. Hartofilakidis-Garofalidis G, Papathanassiou B T (1972)Orthopaedics in ancient Greece. Clin Orthop Relat Res88:309
13. Jouanna J (1974) Hippocrate. Pour une archeologie del’Ecole de Cnide, Paris
14. Kiel F, Herodikos, Der Kleine Pauly 1967, 2:109815. Kollesch J (1989) Knidos als Zentrum der fruhen wissens-
chaftlichen Medizin im antiken Griechenland (46) 12–1316. Legrand Ph-E, Herodote. Histoires, v. I-IX, Paris 1932–1954
(repr. 1968–1970)17. Littre E, Oeuvres completes d’Hippocrate, v. II, III, IV, Paris
1840–1846 (repr. Amsterdam 1961–1962)18. Pauly-Wissowa, Realencyclopaedie, v. VIII1, pp 978–97919. Pollak K (1969) Die Heilkunde der Antike. Griechenland-
Rom-Byzanz. Die Medizin in Bibel und Talmud, Dusseldorf-Wien
20. Ross WD Aristotelis ars rhetorica Oxford 1959 (repr. 1964)21. Sarton G (1960) A history of science. Ancient science
through the golden age of Greece, Cambridge pp 334–33722. Schumacher J (1963) Antike Medizin. Die naturphilosoph-
ischen Grundlagen der Medizin in der griechischen Antike,Berlin pp 81–85
23. Sigerist HE, A history of medicine, v. I-II, New York, 1951–1961
24. Thivel A (1981) Cnide et Cos? Essai sur les doctrines med-icales dans la collection hippocratique, Paris
318 Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2007) 15:315–318
123