health policy primer
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Health policy primer: What’s wrong with American healthcare?
JDG
![Page 2: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
“How can it be that ‘the best medical care in the world’ costs twice as much as the best medical care in the world?”
– Professor Uwe Reinhardt
The American taxpayer is financing these large differences in costs, but we have little evidence of what benefit we receive in exchange.
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/93xx/doc9317/05-29-nasi_speech.pdf
![Page 3: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Looking forward, Medicare spending is projected to grow by at least 5.5% per year for at least the next 10 years, while GDP is at best going to grow about 2.5% on average. Since goverment revenue roughly tracks GDP, this 3 percent gap between Medicare vs. GDP growth is what drives our chronic, structural deficit that's bankrupting the US.
Medicare/Medicaid spending as percent of GDP
Per
cent
GD
P
YearSource: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/7/1600.abstract
![Page 4: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Notice the two lines in the graph: “Effect of Aging Alone" and "Effect of Excess Cost Growth."
The latter, excess cost growth, is actually the major driver of excess, wasteful spending -- what we call "medical cost inflation." That cost inflation is fueled by taxpayer-funded OVER-spending by Medicare on exorbitantly priced medical technology that often does not improve health. Medicare is formally not allowed to consider cost when determining whether to pay for a new treatment, device, or technology (nor does Medicare negotiate on price). As a result, hospitals compete by adopting the most expensive new technology available - in spite of the lack of proven comparative health benefits.
Source: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/93xx/doc9317/05-29-nasi_speech.pdf
![Page 5: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is a healthcare system supposed to do?When looking at any model of insurance, public or private, you want to look at how the model promotes thrift on both price and utilization rates, since Total Spending = Price of all services (P) x Quantity of all services provided (Q).
A series of studies have shown that in general, higher spending shows little association with improved health outcomes:
![Page 6: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Why do we want to restrain utilization?
A series of studies have shown that in general, higher spending shows little association with improved health outcomes:
“For all of the quality indicators studied, the association with spending is either nil or negative. The absence of positive correlations suggests that some institutions achieve exemplary performance on quality measures in settings that feature lower intensity of care.”
http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/28/4/w566.abstract
![Page 7: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
More evidence….“Quality of care in higher-spending regions was no better on most measures and was worse for several preventive care measures…. Neither quality of care nor access to care appear to be better for Medicare enrollees in higher spending regions.”
http://www.annals.org/content/138/4/273.abstract
![Page 8: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
And a famous experiment on different health plans showed that there is an optimum level of utilization that can be achieved with the right level of cost sharing: not overly generous but not
dissuading needed care:
“In general, the reduction in services induced by cost sharing had no adverse effect on participants’ health.”
http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9174/index1.html
![Page 9: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
With that in mind, Americans do not differ much from other OECD countries in our utilization rates, yet we spend nearly twice the OECD median on healthcare:
Source: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/16/49084355.pdf
![Page 10: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Which has led to the conclusion that the US pays disproportionately high prices for a similar amount of healthcare being provided:
Source: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/22/3/89.full.pdf
![Page 11: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Here's a more direct illustration of the prices we pay:
Source: http://www.ifhp.com/documents/2011iFHPPriceReportGraphs_version3.pdf
![Page 12: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Source: http://www.ifhp.com/documents/2011iFHPPriceReportGraphs_version3.pdf
![Page 13: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
All of this points to the need to be more aggressive not only in negotiating prices, but in understanding the value of the services we're paying for. There is room for market-
based principles here:
Source: http://www.economist.com/node/21546059
![Page 17: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Consumer-driven (high-deductible) health plans have been shown to save 14 percent on cost, in comparison with traditional health plans:
Source: http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2011/2011-3-vol17-n3/AJMC_11mar_Buntin_222to230
![Page 18: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
At the same time, the delivery of healthcare is incredibly arcane to most consumers, and shopping around on prices is a nightmare – and prices can vary by magnitudes of 100!
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/23/the-confusion-of-hospital-pricing/
![Page 19: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
More transparency on pricing will go a long way towards empowering consumers to seek the most value for their healthcare dollars.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-adv-medical-prices-20120415,0,1276328,full.story
![Page 20: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
But in many other healthcare systems, the government is much more involved in setting reimbursement rates that reflect the value of the care being provided.
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/high-health-care-costs-its-all-in-the-pricing/2012/02/28/gIQAtbhimR_story.html
![Page 21: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
So, there is a major role for comparative-effectiveness research to
help shed light on what procedures and new medical innovations
truly deliver 'high-value, cost-conscious' care – and which ones are
simply overkill - i.e. more emphasis on primary & preventive care
would deliver better health than expensive, unnecessary
procedures, and often redundant, poorly coordinated care.
For more on this, see “Box 1,” pg 11-12: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/87xx/doc8758/11-13-lt-health.pdf
![Page 22: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
But – How does Medicare’s payment policy compare to other country healthcare systems?
Medicare adopts new treatments under a process called a 'National Coverage Determination,' wherein CMS is not formally allowed to consider cost.
Medicare recently adopted a therapeutic vaccine for late-stage prostate cancer that costs $93,000 per patient -- this, despite the fact it's proven to only extend life by about 4 months.
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/medicare-moves-to-pay-for-prostate-cancer-drug-provenge/2011/03/30/AFXzam4B_story.html
![Page 23: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
And private insurers typically follow Medicare’s lead in determining what to cover.
![Page 24: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
As a result, hospitals compete with each other by adopting the newest and most expensive technology available in efforts to win higher reimbursement rates and
attract better physicians.
“Hospital costs are soaring across the Washington area as the cost of buying the newest technologies jumps and more uninsured patients take their toll.”
![Page 25: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Driving the ballooning costs are ever-growing – and costly – medical technologies
Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/maryland-news/2012/05/hospital-rates-jump-across-washington-region/592766
![Page 26: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Singapore, one of the world’s top-rated healthcare systems, faced this same problem and was able to achieve cost control by limiting the rate at which new, unproven
technology could be introduced into public hospitals.
Source: http://www.healthbeatblog.com/2008/07/health-care-in.html
![Page 27: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
There is a confluence of movements within the U.S. medical community going on to “Choose Wisely” and lead in this direction of "high value, cost conscious care":
… but ultimately, more must be done at the policy level to promote reform in the way we pay for healthcare – and how much we pay.
http://www.abimfoundation.org/Initiatives/Choosing-Wisely.aspx
http://www.annals.org/content/156/2/147.full.pdf+html
![Page 28: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
To summarize…3 major steps will go a long way to reducing healthcare spending
in the US:• Moving consumers into a paradigm of high-deductible, consumer-driven health
plans with attached health savings accounts*• Requiring greater transparency and consistency in pricing among hospitals and
other providers (while enforcing consistent quality of care standards)*• Incorporating comparative-effectiveness research (CER) into Medicare payment
policy, thereby pushing producers of technology and pharmaceuticals to bring products into the market that demonstrate value in comparison to the current standard of care or generic alternative.
This isn’t a comprehensive list of how to reform Medicare, but it could be a strong start towards a more efficient healthcare system.
*Note: The Affordable Care Act contains provisions that seek to achieve both of these objectives. ACA also introduces comparative effectiveness research but it is questionable whether CER will play a central role in reforming Medicare reimbursement. (For more, see p. 8-9: http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8061.pdf)
![Page 29: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The over-arching goal is to FLATTEN the cost curve that drives medical cost inflation
The ability of the U.S. to maintain a sustainable level of spending and remain solvent as a nation depends almost exclusively on this problem being solved.
![Page 30: Health policy primer](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062523/58f3485f1a28abe41a8b461b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Pessimists vs. Optimists• Glass half empty: The U.S. healthcare system is grossly inefficient
and is ill-equipped to deliver the same standard of quality care to the increasing burden of retirees while spending twice the OECD median per capita on care. Healthcare spending is projected to continue driving up national debt indefinitely.
• Glass half full: The country can afford to spend drastically less on healthcare and still deliver excellent quality care to its citizens, while stabilizing the cost curve and finally setting the US on a path to shrink the national debt. Smart policymakers have an opportunity to seize and can work together to make this a reality.