health policy and the federal budget process

34
Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process Tim Westmoreland Visiting Professor of Law Research Professor of Public Policy Georgetown University February 2006

Upload: jakeem-goodman

Post on 30-Dec-2015

47 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process. Tim Westmoreland Visiting Professor of Law Research Professor of Public Policy Georgetown University February 2006. Figure 1. Introduction to the Federal Budget. It’s big. Really big. It drives federal policy in all areas--especially health. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Tim WestmorelandVisiting Professor of Law

Research Professor of Public Policy

Georgetown University

February 2006

Page 2: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Introduction to the Federal Budget

• It’s big. Really big.

• It drives federal policy in all areas--especially health.

• Very few people understand even the basics.

• By the time you finish this introduction, you will be one of the top 1% of Americans in terms of budget proficiency.

Figure 1

Page 3: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

To Begin: Four Necessary Terms

• Revenues--money coming into the federal government (also referred to as “receipts’)

• Spending--money going out of the federal government (“outlays”)

• Deficit--annual revenues minus annual spending

• Debt--sum total of all annual deficits (and surpluses)

Figure 2

Page 4: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Total Revenues = ~$1.9 Trillion (FY 2004)

• Personal Income Tax = ~$900 Billion

• Social Insurance Taxes = ~$750 Billion

• Corporate Taxes = ~$200 Billion

• All other sources = ~$200 Billion

Figure 3

Corporate Taxes

Other Sources

Social Insurance

Taxes

Personal Income Tax

SOURCE: OMB, Fiscal Year 2004 Budget, February 2003.

Page 5: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Federal Spending in the President’s FY 2006 Budget

SOURCE: OMB, Fiscal Year 2006 Budget, February 2005.

Total Outlays= $2.57 trillion

Figure 4

Social Security 21%

Medicare 13%

Medicaid and SCHIP

8%Other14%Net Interest

8%

Non-defense Discretionary

19%

Defense Discretionary

17%

Page 6: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Funding Proposed for HHS Health Programs in Bush Administration’s FY 2006 Budget

Notes: Totals do not include funding for the Administration on Children and Families, the Administration on Aging and Program Support Center. AHRQ funding is entirely through transfers from other HHS agencies. Totals do not add to 100% due to rounding. SOURCE: HHS, Budget in Brief FY 2006, February 2005.

Total = $592 Billion Total = $52.6 Billion

Health Discretionary

Programs9%

Medicare58%

Medicaid33%

SCHIP1%

Figure 5

HRSA11%

CDC 8%

IHS 6%

FDA 3%

SAMHSA 6%

CMS-PM 6%

OS-DM6%

NIH54%

Page 7: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Total Deficit = Depends on How You Count It

• Unified Budget (Count all revenues, including money coming in for trust funds for future use): $400 billion

• On-budget Totals (Technical legal definition, not counting Social Security or the Postal Service): $570 billion

• Federal Funds Budget (Count only revenues that can be spent this year): $600 billion

Figure 6

Page 8: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Total Debt = $8.2 Trillion and Counting…

Q: What is the debt?A: Money loaned to the federal government (such as

Savings Bonds or Treasury Bills) that has to be paid back with interest.

Q: Where is the debt?A: ~$4.7T held by the public (investors, banks, pension

funds, etc.)• Including ~$2.1T held by foreign investors and governments

Plus ~$3.5T held by the federal government to use in

the future (e.g., the Social Security Trust Fund, the Medicare Trust Fund, etc.)

Figure 7

Page 9: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Four Necessary Budget Concepts

• Three kinds of spending

• Baseline

• Limits

• Scorekeeping

Figure 8

Page 10: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Three Kinds of Spending

• Discretionary spending

• Mandatory spending

• Tax spending

Figure 9

Page 11: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Discretionary Spending

• Spending that is up to the Congress to decide each year.

• In any single year, it can be from zero to 100% of the level authorized in law for each program.

• The presumption is that the money will not be there unless the Congress acts to provide it.

• Budgeting by dollars.– E.g., Congress may provide $100 million for childhood

immunizations; how many children can be immunized for that?

Figure 10

Page 12: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Examples of Discretionary Spending

• National Institutes of Health

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

• Indian Health Service

• Title X Family Planning

• Funding for – Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)– Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)– Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Figure 11

Page 13: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Mandatory Spending• Spending that is promised in statute for an ongoing

period.

• In any single year, it will be enough to meet the promise of the statute

• The presumption is that the money will be there unless the Congress acts to change the promise in statute.

• Budgeting by goods and services.– E.g., Congress may promise free vaccine to all children; how

much will that cost?

• Medicare and Medicaid are examples of mandatory health spending

Figure 12

Page 14: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Tax Spending

• Tax spending is “revenue foregone,” i.e., money that would normally have come in as taxes but is, instead, kept by the taxpayer for a special use.

– The usual forms are a tax deduction, a tax credit, or a refundable tax credit.

– E.g., if you immunize your own child, you may be allowed to deduct the cost of the vaccine from your taxes.

• Most tax spending is an ongoing promise in statute (like mandatory spending), so the presumption is that the money will be there unless Congress changes the promise in statute.

Figure 13

Page 15: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Tax Spending (continued)

• Since the money never actually comes into the Treasury, tax spending is an indirect form of spending.

– But for bookkeeping and accounting purposes, money that doesn’t come in is the same as money that comes in and goes out.

• As opposed to the other spending types, this spending is rarely noted as part of the budget.

– E.g., the President’s proposal for 2005 was described as “$2.57 trillion”; if tax spending had been included it would have been $3.49 trillion”.

Figure 14

Page 16: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

The President’s Health Care-RelatedTax Proposals, FY 2006 – FY 2015

$74.0

$28.5

$22.7

$0.2

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

$160

$180 Billions of Dollars

Total = $125 Billion

SOURCE: Department of the Treasury, “2005 Blue Book” General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2006 Revenue Proposals, February 2005.

Other Health Tax Related Proposals

Health Insurance Tax Credit

High Deductible Insurance Premiums Tax Deduction

Small Employer Tax Credit for HSA Contributions

Figure 15

Page 17: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Discretionary

Mandatory

Types of Spending are Changing in Proportion

SOURCE: OMB, FY05 Budget, February 2005 (Historical Tables, Table 8.3).

Figure 16Figure 16

1969 2005

Page 18: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Tax Spending Will Soon Outpace Discretionary Spending for the First Time

0

500

1000

1500

2005 2007 2009

Discretionary

Tax

Mandatory

Figure 17

SOURCE: Congressional Research Service and Federal Reserve.

Page 19: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Baseline

• “The Baseline” is the projection of how much mandatory spending will be in the future.

• To keep the promise in the statute, more money will be needed in the future.

– E.g., the promise may cost more, may cover more people, or may include more goods and services.

Figure 18

Page 20: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

SOURCE: OMB, President’s FY2006 Budget, Historical Tables, February 2005.

$433$407

$381

$265$290

$340

$460

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Projections of Federal Medicare Spending, 2004-2010

Billions of Dollars

Figure 19

Page 21: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Changes to the Baseline

• For instance, the promise of Medicare will cost more next year than this year.

– There will be more people who qualify.

– The costs of current services will inflate.

– The mix of goods and services will expand (e.g., old technologies (like X-rays) will be supplemented with new ones (like CAT scans)

• Providing the same amount of money from year to year would erode the promise.

Figure 20

Page 22: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Limits--Discretionary

• Discretionary spending is limited by an overall cap, specified in the annual Congressional budget resolution.

– The total of all discretionary spending cannot exceed a specified total.

– This creates a zero-sum game for new spending.• Creating a new program requires cutting an existing

program.

Figure 21

Page 23: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Limits—Mandatory and Tax Spending

• Mandatory spending and tax spending already in law are not capped.

– A cap would force breaking statutory promises.

– Unless Congress changes the promise in statute, mandatory spending and tax spending grow automatically.

• Any legislation that increases mandatory or tax spending above the level specified in the annual Congressional budget resolution is subject to a “Pay As You Go” (or PAYGO) requirement.

• PAYGO requires that any legislation increasing mandatory spending promises must be accompanied by legislation reducing mandatory spending promises by an equal amount.

Figure 22

Page 24: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Scorekeeping

• To know whether new legislation meets PAYGO requires an estimate of the costs and savings. This estimate is called “the score.”

• The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a non-partisan branch of the Congress, is the official scorekeeper of legislation.

Figure 23

Page 25: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Scorekeeping (continued)

• CBO estimates the five-year costs of mandatory spending or tax spending legislation.

– E.g., a bill to provide free immunizations to all children will increase spending

– Or, put another way…

costs = (number of children) x (percentage of children who will seek immunization) x (cost of the immunizations per child) x (expected increases in children, percentages, and costs).

Figure 24

Page 26: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Scorekeeping (continued)

• In estimating the score, CBO may also take into account possible savings.

– E.g., the immunizations bill may save some money because children will no longer be hospitalized for preventable illness.

Figure 25

Page 27: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Federal Budget Process

SOURCES: Congressional Budget Act of 1974, as amended; Oleszek, Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 2001

Congressional Budget Resolution

Discretionary spending allocated to the Appropriations committees

Annual Appropriations

- House and Senate Appropriations committees sub-allocate spending to their subcommittees

- Bills considered by House/Senate and negotiated in conference

- Bills signed by the President

Budget Reconciliation

- Senate Finance, House Commerce, House Ways & Means, and other committees report changes to House/Senate budget committees

- Changes compiled into one bill

- Bill considered by House/Senate and negotiated in conference

- Bill signed by the President

OR

President’s Budget Submitted to CongressFirst Monday in February

Fiscal Year begins October 1

Figure 26

Page 28: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

The Federal Budget Calendar:February- March

Early February: President submits proposed budget for the next year to the Congress.

•This budget sets the Administration’s programmatic and funding priorities

•Proposal only advisory to the Congress-- not binding

February & March: House and Senate committees hold hearings on the proposed budget.

Figure 27

Page 29: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

The Federal Budget Calendar:April

April 15: The Congress passes a House/ Senate Budget Resolution.

• Resolution is a blueprint of Congress’ plan for the budget.

• It is NOT law and is NOT sent to the President for signature.

• This resolution contains both the Discretionary Spending Cap and any targets for planned cuts or increases in mandatory and tax spending.

Note: This deadline is frequently missed.

Figure 28

Page 30: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

The Federal Budget Calendar:May-September

May through September:

• Appropriations Committees draft and enact legislation to provide discretionary spending for the coming year, up to the level of the Discretionary Spending Cap.

• Authorizing Committees draft and enact legislation to make mandatory and tax spending changes to meet targets set in the Budget Resolution.

– The entire package of this legislation is called “Budget Reconciliation” (because it “reconciles” the promises in statute with the targets for the budget).

Figure 29

Page 31: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

The Federal Budget Calendar: October

October 1: New federal fiscal year begins

– If appropriations laws are not enacted by October 1, Congress typically enacts temporary “band-aid” measures (called Continuing Resolutions) to keep programs operating until the laws are enacted.

Figure 30

Page 32: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Four (of Many) Health Policy Problems Caused by the Budget Process

• Discretionary spending breaks promises.

– Health care costs grow faster than discretionary spending. Programs to provide comprehensive health care (like the Indian Health Service) will fall behind.

• Long-term health investments discouraged.

– New prevention and treatment efforts may reduce mandatory spending in the long run, BUT scorekeeping looks at only the next five years.

– E.g., early treatment of HIV costs money in the short run but may save money in the long run.

Figure 31

Page 33: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

Four Problems (continued)

• Tax spending is opaque and unevaluated.

– Increasingly, federal policy is funded through tax spending, BUT it is not generally shown as part of the budget and is rarely evaluated for effectiveness.

• Scorekeeping overprices and undervalues health benefits.

– Scores for prevention and treatment may appear high— BUT that’s because the services keep people alive longer.

Figure 32

Page 34: Health Policy and the Federal Budget Process

In Conclusion

• The budget and its process are always changing.

– E.g., surplus once in 2000, huge deficits since.

– E.g., Medicare will soon begin paying for services out of its trust fund.

– E.g., new rules for PAYGO are under consideration.

• But it will always be big and it will always drive policy.

• But now you understand it.

Figure 33