health atlas 2008. contents 2 5 acknowledgements 6 the use of colours in the bar charts and maps 7...

Health Atlas 2008

2Contents

Contents

5 Acknowledgements

6 The use of colours in the bar charts and maps

7 Life expectancy at birth - ranking

8 Life expectancy at birth - trends

9 Life expectancy at birth - male

10 Life expectancy at birth - female

11 Median age of the population

12 Fertility rate per 1,000 females aged 15-44

13 Low weight births - as a percentage of all births

14 Very low weight births - as a percentage of all births

15 % population < 5

16 % population 5 - 15

17 % population 65+

18 % population 75+

19 % population non white

20 Population in communal establishments per 1000 population

21 IMD 2007 ward overall score

22 IMD 2007 LSOA overall score

23 IMD 2007 ward Income Domain

24 IMD 2007 LSOA Income Domain

25 IMD 2007 ward Health Deprivation and Disability Domain

26 IMD 2007 LSOA Health Deprivation and Disability Domain

27 IMD 2007 ward Multiple Barriers to Housing and Services Domain

28 IMD 2007 LSOA Multiple Barriers to Housing and Services Domain

29 IMD 2007 LSOA Sub Domain: Geographical Barriers

30 IMD 2007 LSOA Sub Domain: Wider Barriers

31 IMD 2007 LSOA Employment Domain

32 IMD 2007 LSOA Living Environment Domain

33 IMD 2007 LSOA Sub-Domain: The ‘indoors’ living environment

34 IMD 2007 LSOA Sub-Domain: The ‘outdoors’ living environment

35 IMD 2007 LSOA Crime Domain

36 % working population unemployed

37 IMD 2007 LSOA Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain

38 % people aged 16 to 74 with socio-economic status "never worked or long term unemployed"

39 IMD 2007 LSOA Sub Domain: Skills

40 % people aged 16 to 74 with socio-economic status "higher managerial and professional occupations"

3Contents

Contents (2)

41 IMD 2007 LSOA Sub Domain: Children/young people

42 % residents aged 16-74 with no qualifications

43 % households with children under 5

44 IMD 2007 ward Sub Domain: Children/young people

45 % households with one or more dependent children

46 % households with dependent children in which no adult has employment

47 % households with lone parents and dependent children

48 % households with female lone parent who is unemployed

49 Full time students aged 16 to 17 per 1000 population aged 16-17

50 Conception rate per 1000 females aged 15-17

51 % single person households

52 % single person non pensioner households

53 % households with single pensioners

54 Residents providing unpaid care per 1000 population

55 % households with no car or van

56 % houses marked as council tax band A

57 % households rated as overcrowded

58 % population reporting limiting long term illness

59 % population feeling in poor health

60 % children overweight or obese in year 6

61 % children overweight or obese in reception

62 Synthetic estimates of lifestyle factors sum of ward rankings

63 Smoking synthetic estimate

64 Obesity synthetic estimate

65 Adult 5 a day fruit and vegetable consumption synthetic estimate

66 Child 3 a day fruit and vegetable consumption synthetic estimate

67 Binge drinking synthetic estimate

68 10 year predicted risk CVD > 20% directly standardised rate per 100000 aged 35-74

69 CHD or Stroke register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages

70 CHD register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages

71 Cancer register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages

72 Diabetes register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages

73 COPD or Asthma register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages

74 James Paget Hospital A&E attendances directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages

75 All cause mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 persons

76 Circulatory disease mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 persons

4Contents

Contents (3)

77 Cancer mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 persons

78 All cause mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 female

79 Circulatory disease mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 female

80 Cancer mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 female

81 All cause mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 male

82 Circulatory disease mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 male

83 Cancer mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 male

84 Travel times from postcodes to Northgate Hospital

85 Travel times from postcodes to Lowestoft Hospital

86 Travel times from postcodes to Beccles Hospital

87 Travel times from postcodes to All Hallows Hospital

88 Travel times from postcodes to Patrick Stead Hospital

89 Travel times from postcodes to Southwold Hospital

5Contents

Acknowledgements

Dr Alistair Lipp for promoting the transition from data to information to knowledge

Peter Ayre for constructing the ward maps

Public Health team for constructing the IMD 2007 maps

ERPHO for the travel time maps

Staff at Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT for reviewing the content

Contact Tim Winters with any errors, queries or suggestions

Public Health Department

Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT

1 Common Lane North

Beccles

NR34 9BN

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 01502 719528

Maps are built from Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) boundaries.

Source: ONS, Super Output Area Boundaries. Crown copyright 2004. Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO

6Contents

The use of colours in the bar charts and maps (Census 2001)

All bar charts show data from the 40 wards within Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT. Where available we have shown the average value for Great Yarmouth, Waveney, Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT and also data from other comparators: England, East of England, ONS cluster Coastal and Countryside, Norfolk and Suffolk. The darkest red is used to show where there might be an increased demand for services. The five shades of red are used to colour the same wards on the map and the bar chart.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nBe

ccle

s N

orth

Hal

esw

orth

Pake

field

Cai

ster

Sou

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

Gor

lest

onG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nKe

ssin

glan

dM

agda

len

Whi

tton

Bung

ayBl

ythi

ngYa

rmou

th N

orth

East

Fle

ggBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Cai

ster

Nor

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sO

rmes

byW

orlin

gham

Becc

les

Sout

hW

rent

ham

Wes

t Fle

ggC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teC

layd

onBr

adw

ell N

orth

Nor

man

ston

Kirk

ley

The

Sain

tsO

ulto

nH

arbo

urN

elso

nSt

And

rew

sFl

eggb

urgh

Wai

nfor

dC

arlto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eySo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and

Great Yarmouth and Waveney wards

%

Most likely to increase demand on services

Least likely to increase demand on services

Same shade of red used to colour the

wards in the bar chart and map

Comparators

Title (source and year)

7Contents

Life expectancy at birth - ranking (NCHOD / ERPHO 1991-2005)

Life Expectancy ranking out of 352 Local Authorities[Higher ranking indicates longer Life Expectancy]

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Year

Ran

kin

g o

ut

of

352

Lo

cal

Au

tho

riti

es

Gt. Yarmouth 116 111 105 98 117 103 103 79 100 110 119 126 96 157 182 160 216 198 166 135 120 111 120 153 162 176

Waveney 257 264 227 194 156 160 137 179 182 214 202 219 213 240 275 229 218 200 269 292 308 283 265 226 209 191

91-93 92-94 93-95 94-96 95-97 96-98 97-99 98-00 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 91-93 92-94 93-95 94-96 95-97 96-98 97-99 98-00 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05

Males Females

Life Expectancy (at birth) is a reasonable single measure which reflects the overall impact of life's adverse circumstances. Most of the other indicators in this atlas will have some impact - direct or otherwise - on life expectancy.

The long-term trend for Waveney males shows a fall in the national "league table" of 352 local authorities - indicating that life expectancy in other areas is increasing faster than in Waveney. However, there has been a promising recent upturn in life expectancy which may, if efforts continue, reverse the long term trend. In Great Yarmouth male life expectancy is less than in Waveney and the long term trend is mostly flat indicating that life expectancy is changing at about the same rate as it always has in relation to other areas.

Worryingly for females in Waveney life expectancy for females has fallen down the "league table" since 1999. This needs to be addressed. In Great Yarmouth the increasing rank of female life expectancy shows that life expectancy for females has been increasing faster than in other areas.

8Contents

Life expectancy at birth - trends (NCHOD / ERPHO 1991-2005)

For males in Great Yarmouth and Waveney the long term trends are slightly less steep than the England and East of England trends. This indicates that life expectancy is increasing slower in Great Yarmouth and Waveney. For females the situation is similar.

Great Yarmouth and Waveney - Life Expectancy - Males (1991 - 2005)

73.0

74.0

75.0

76.0

77.0

78.0

79.0

80.0

91-93 92-94 93-95 94-96 95-97 96-98 97-99 98-00 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10

Year

Life

Exp

ecta

ncy

England East of EnglandGt. Yarmouth WaveneyEngland Trend East of England TrendGt. Yarmouth Trend Waveney Trend

Great Yarmouth and Waveney - Life Expectancy - Females (1991 - 2005)

78.0

78.5

79.0

79.5

80.0

80.5

81.0

81.5

82.0

82.5

83.0

91-93 92-94 93-95 94-96 95-97 96-98 97-99 98-00 99-01 00-02 01-03 02-04 03-05 04-06 05-07 06-08 07-09 08-10

Year

Life

Exp

ecta

ncy

England East of EnglandGt. Yarmouth WaveneyEngland Trend East of England TrendGt. Yarmouth Trend Waveney Trend

9Contents

Life expectancy at birth - male (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

For males life expectancy in 2003-2005 within Great Yarmouth and Waveney wards ranged from 69 years to 87 years. The lower life expectancy is associated with the more deprived urban wards and the higher life expectancy is associated with the less deprived wards.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Nel

son

Kirk

ley

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Yarm

outh

Nor

thW

rent

ham

Cla

ydon

Har

bour

Gor

lest

onO

ulto

nLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sW

est F

legg

East

Fle

ggSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Nor

man

ston

Cai

ster

Nor

thBe

ccle

s N

orth

Kess

ingl

and

Bung

ayC

arlto

nO

ulto

n Br

oad

Whi

tton

Mag

dale

nPa

kefie

ldLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eySt

And

rew

sBr

adw

ell N

orth

Wor

lingh

amH

ales

wor

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Car

lton

Col

ville

Wai

nfor

dO

rmes

byFl

eggb

urgh

The

Sain

tsSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Becc

les

Sout

hC

aist

er S

outh

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Blyt

hing

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


life

ex

pe

cta

nc

y (

ye

ars

)



10Contents

Life expectancy at birth - female (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

For females life expectancy in 2003-2005 within Great Yarmouth and Waveney wards ranged from 76 years to 95 years. Interestingly for female life expectancy there does not appear to be as dramatically an association with deprivation as there is with men.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

St M

arga

ret's

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Har

bour

Kirk

ley

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyH

ales

wor

thO

ulto

nBu

ngay

Gor

lest

onYa

rmou

th N

orth

Cai

ster

Nor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleBr

adw

ell N

orth

Oul

ton

Broa

dKe

ssin

glan

dN

orm

anst

onO

rmes

byEa

st F

legg

St A

ndre

ws

Cla

ydon

Nel

son

Becc

les

Sout

hW

est F

legg

Becc

les

Nor

thC

aist

er S

outh

Mag

dale

nPa

kefie

ldLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thC

arlto

nTh

e Sa

ints

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Whi

tton

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nW

orlin

gham

Wre

ntha

mW

ainf

ord

Fleg

gbur

ghSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Blyt

hing

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


life

ex

pe

cta

nc

y (

ye

ars

)



11Contents

Median age of the population (Census 2001)

Great Yarmouth & Waveney's population is older than that of England and the region (East of England). This is accounted for by above average numbers of elderly people and below average numbers of children. Nevertheless, within the wards there is a considerable range of median ages. Southwold and Reydon and Caister South have the oldest populations. Harbour and Southtown and Cobholm have the youngest populations

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nBe

ccle

s N

orth

Oul

ton

Broa

dC

aist

er S

outh

Gor

lest

onH

ales

wor

thPa

kefie

ldEa

st F

legg

Blyt

hing

Kess

ingl

and

Orm

esby

Whi

tton

The

Sain

tsW

rent

ham

Bung

ayC

aist

er N

orth

Wai

nfor

dW

est F

legg

Yarm

outh

Nor

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nFl

eggb

urgh

Mag

dale

nSt

Mar

gare

t'sW

orlin

gham

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Oul

ton

Becc

les

Sout

hC

layd

onLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyC

arlto

nKi

rkle

yN

elso

nN

orm

anst

onSt

And

rew

sC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleH

arbo

urSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


ag

e (

ye

ars

)



12Contents

Fertility rate per 1,000 females aged 15-44 (ONS/NCHOD 2003-2005)

Higher fertility rates potentially indicate a greater need for post natal support services. Nelson ward has the highest fertility rate and Southwold and Reydon the lowest.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Nel

son

Har

bour

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmKi

rkle

yC

layd

onN

orm

anst

onC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teSt

And

rew

sC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleBe

ccle

s N

orth

Yarm

outh

Nor

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sC

arlto

nBu

ngay

Becc

les

Sout

hG

orle

ston

Mag

dale

nBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Wor

lingh

amW

hitto

nKe

ssin

glan

dO

ulto

nC

aist

er N

orth

Wes

t Fle

ggO

ulto

n Br

oad

Blyt

hing

Pake

field

The

Sain

tsLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nEa

st F

legg

Cai

ster

Sou

thFl

eggb

urgh

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Hal

esw

orth

Wai

nfor

dBr

adw

ell N

orth

Orm

esby

Wre

ntha

mSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


rate

pe

r 1

00

0 f

em

ale

s a

ge

d 1

5-4

4



13Contents

Low weight births - as a percentage of all births (ONS/NCHOD 2003-2005)

Low weight births (under 2.5 kg) are associated with premature birth, but are also commoner in mothers who smoke heavily. They may also be more common in older mothers. Older mothers may be more associated with less deprived areas who leave pregnancy till later in life. Generally low birth weights are commoner in the more deprived wards. The values are probably affected by the small numbers of births in some of the wards where one or two low birth weight babies have a disproportionate effect.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Wai

nfor

dM

agda

len

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmO

ulto

n Br

oad

Nel

son

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Har

bour

Cla

ydon

Orm

esby

Fleg

gbur

ghPa

kefie

ldG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nN

orm

anst

onKi

rkle

yBe

ccle

s N

orth

Car

lton

Col

ville

St M

arga

ret's

Bung

ayYa

rmou

th N

orth

Brad

wel

l Nor

thC

arlto

nKe

ssin

glan

dW

est F

legg

Wor

lingh

amSt

And

rew

sC

aist

er N

orth

Whi

tton

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Becc

les

Sout

hBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Blyt

hing

Cai

ster

Sou

thEa

st F

legg

Gor

lest

onH

ales

wor

thLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyO

ulto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

The

Sain

tsW

rent

ham

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



14Contents

Very low weight births - as a percentage of all births (ONS/NCHOD 2003-2005)

Very low weight births (under 1.5 kg) are associated with premature birth, but are also commoner in mothers who smoke heavily. Very low weight births are associated with the more deprived wards.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Kirk

ley

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Mag

dale

nSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Har

bour

Nor

man

ston

Nel

son

Becc

les

Nor

thBe

ccle

s So

uth

Blyt

hing

Brad

wel

l Nor

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Bung

ayC

aist

er N

orth

Cai

ster

Sou

thC

arlto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleC

layd

onEa

st F

legg

Fleg

gbur

ghG

orle

ston

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Hal

esw

orth

Kess

ingl

and

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Orm

esby

Oul

ton

Oul

ton

Broa

dPa

kefie

ldSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

St A

ndre

ws

St M

arga

ret's

The

Sain

tsW

ainf

ord

Wes

t Fle

ggW

hitto

nW

orlin

gham

Wre

ntha

mYa

rmou

th N

orth

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



15Contents

% population < 5 (Census 2001)

Children are more likely to be found in the deprived central wards in Great Yarmouth and Waveney. However, Worlingham and Carlton Colville also have higher proportions reflecting the growth in new housing. The geographic distribution of young children contrasts with that of the over 65 year olds who are more likely to live in the wards with fewer children.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmH

arbo

urN

orm

anst

onN

elso

nC

arlto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleSt

And

rew

sC

layd

onO

ulto

nKi

rkle

yW

orlin

gham

Bung

ayFl

eggb

urgh

Brad

wel

l Nor

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teBe

ccle

s So

uth

Cai

ster

Nor

thO

rmes

byBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Blyt

hing

The

Sain

tsLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thM

agda

len

Becc

les

Nor

thW

hitto

nKe

ssin

glan

dW

est F

legg

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Yarm

outh

Nor

thW

rent

ham

Hal

esw

orth

Pake

field

Wai

nfor

dEa

st F

legg

Cai

ster

Sou

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gor

lest

onSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



16Contents

% population 5 - 15 (Census 2001)

Although similar to the distribution of the under five population, the school age population is less concentrated in the central wards and Lowestoft.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Car

lton

Col

ville

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmKi

rkle

yW

ainf

ord

St M

arga

ret's

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

St A

ndre

ws

Becc

les

Sout

hYa

rmou

th N

orth

Nor

man

ston

Mag

dale

nC

arlto

nTh

e Sa

ints

Har

bour

Wes

t Fle

ggN

elso

nO

ulto

nW

hitto

nW

orlin

gham

Wre

ntha

mBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Kess

ingl

and

Bung

ayBr

adw

ell N

orth

Cla

ydon

Blyt

hing

Fleg

gbur

ghO

rmes

byPa

kefie

ldLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyG

orle

ston

East

Fle

ggC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teH

ales

wor

thG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nC

aist

er N

orth

Cai

ster

Sou

thSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Becc

les

Nor

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



17Contents

% population 65+ (Census 2001)

About 1 in 5 people in Great Yarmouth and Waveney are over the age of 65 years. More than 1 in 4 people in Caister South and Gorleston are over the age of 65 years and more than 1 in 3 people in Southwold. These values are higher than for England or the East on England or Suffolk, but similar to the rest of Norfolk. This age group is more likely to live in and around Caister and Gorleston in the Great Yarmouth region and Halesworth and Beccles in Waveney.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nBe

ccle

s N

orth

Hal

esw

orth

Pake

field

Cai

ster

Sou

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

Gor

lest

onG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nKe

ssin

glan

dM

agda

len

Whi

tton

Bung

ayBl

ythi

ngYa

rmou

th N

orth

East

Fle

ggBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Cai

ster

Nor

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sO

rmes

byW

orlin

gham

Becc

les

Sout

hW

rent

ham

Wes

t Fle

ggC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teC

layd

onBr

adw

ell N

orth

Nor

man

ston

Kirk

ley

The

Sain

tsO

ulto

nH

arbo

urN

elso

nSt

And

rew

sFl

eggb

urgh

Wai

nfor

dC

arlto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eySo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



18Contents

% population 75+ (Census 2001)

About 1 in 10 people in Waveney are over the age of 75 years. 1 in 5 people in Southwold are over the age of 75 years. About 1 in 10 people in Great Yarmouth are over the age of 75 years. 1 in 7 people in Gorleston are over the age of 75 years. These values are higher than that for Suffolk, England and the East of England, but similar to the rest of Norfolk. It presents a challenge for carers, voluntary and statutory services. The geographic distribution is very similar to that for the over 65 year olds.

0

5

10

15

20

25

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nBe

ccle

s N

orth

Hal

esw

orth

Pake

field

Gor

lest

onO

ulto

n Br

oad

Cai

ster

Sou

thG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nBu

ngay

Mag

dale

nKe

ssin

glan

dYa

rmou

th N

orth

Blyt

hing

Whi

tton

East

Fle

ggKi

rkle

yBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Har

bour

St M

arga

ret's

Cla

ydon

Becc

les

Sout

hC

aist

er N

orth

Orm

esby

Wor

lingh

amW

est F

legg

Nor

man

ston

Nel

son

Brad

wel

l Nor

thW

rent

ham

St A

ndre

ws

Oul

ton

Car

lton

The

Sain

tsFl

eggb

urgh

Car

lton

Col

ville

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Wai

nfor

dLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



19Contents

% population non white (Census 2001)

Great Yarmouth & Waveney with the exception of Lothingland has a less diverse population than the rest of the region and considerably less than the population of England. The white population now includes increasing numbers of people from elsewhere in Europe whose first language is not English. The rarity of the non-white population is likely to make it more difficult for statutory services to respond to specific cultural needs. These minority ethnic groups are more likely to live in the deprived central areas and this is likely to reflect a generally poorer economic status.

20Contents

Population in communal establishments per 1000 population (Census 2001)

This slide represents the proportion of people in communal establishments and currently includes those in prison, hospitals, care homes and sheltered housing. It is easy to see the impact of Blundeston prison in Lothingland ward in Waveney.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nKi

rkle

yG

orle

ston

Bung

ayN

elso

nEa

st F

legg

Becc

les

Nor

thM

agda

len

Hal

esw

orth

Yarm

outh

Nor

thH

arbo

urO

ulto

n Br

oad

Car

lton

Col

ville

Brad

wel

l Nor

thG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nO

rmes

byW

est F

legg

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nKe

ssin

glan

dSt

And

rew

sPa

kefie

ldC

aist

er S

outh

Becc

les

Sout

hC

arlto

nLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thC

aist

er N

orth

Cla

ydon

Nor

man

ston

St M

arga

ret's

Wre

ntha

mBl

ythi

ngFl

eggb

urgh

Oul

ton

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmTh

e Sa

ints

Wai

nfor

dW

hitto

nW

orlin

gham

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


rate

pe

r 1

00

0



21Contents

IMD 2007 ward overall score (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville

Bradwell South & Hopton

Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham

Lothingland Yarmouth

Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford

Halesworth Southwold & Reydon

Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 wardoverall

35.95 to 62.78 (8)20.74 to 35.95 (8)17.14 to 20.74 (7)15.88 to 17.14 (9)8.99 to 15.88 (8)

Looking at the larger ward level area masks some pockets of deprivation. These pockets can be seen in the more detailed Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) maps that follow. Within Great Yarmouth the most deprived wards are Nelson, Central and Northgate. Within Waveney deprivation appears concentrated in Lowestoft in Harbour and Kirkley wards with additional high levels of deprivation in some of the more rural wards. The pattern of ill health more closely mirrors that of overall deprivation. Great Yarmouth is more deprived than Waveney.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Nel

son

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmH

arbo

urKi

rkle

yC

layd

onN

orm

anst

onM

agda

len

Yarm

outh

Nor

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sSt

And

rew

sW

hitto

nW

rent

ham

Pake

field

Kess

ingl

and

East

Fle

ggBe

ccle

s So

uth

Cai

ster

Sou

thBe

ccle

s N

orth

Cai

ster

Nor

thFl

eggb

urgh

The

Sain

tsLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyC

arlto

nBu

ngay

Blyt

hing

Gor

lest

onW

ainf

ord

Oul

ton

Wes

t Fle

ggBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Hal

esw

orth

Oul

ton

Broa

dO

rmes

byG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Brad

wel

l Nor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

orlin

gham

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


IMD

20

07

ov

era

ll s

co

re



22Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA overall score (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAoverall

36.90 to 73.87 (26)25.26 to 36.90 (27)17.56 to 25.26 (27)13.00 to 17.56 (27)5.51 to 13.00 (27)

The IMD 2007 is a measure of multiple deprivation at the small area level and is comparable to IMD 2004. The model of multiple deprivation which underpins the IMD 2007 is based on the idea of distinct dimensions of deprivation which can be recognised and measured separately. These are experienced by individuals living in an area. People may be counted in one or more of the domains, depending on the number of types of deprivation that they experience. The overall IMD is conceptualised as a weighted area level aggregation of these specific dimensions of deprivation. The domains and their weights are Income Deprivation Domain (22.5 %), Employment Deprivation Domain (22.5%), Health Deprivation and Disability Domain (13.5%), Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain (13.5%), Barriers to Housing and Services Domain (9.3%), Crime Domain (9.3%) and Living Environment Deprivation Domain (9.3%).

23Contents

IMD 2007 ward Income Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 wardincome

0.26 to 0.45 (8)0.15 to 0.26 (8)0.12 to 0.15 (8)0.11 to 0.12 (8)0.08 to 0.11 (8)

The wards with most deprived in terms of income are Nelson and Claydon in Great Yarmouth and Harbour and Kirkley in Waveney

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

Nel

son

Har

bour

Cla

ydon

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmKi

rkle

yM

agda

len

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Yarm

outh

Nor

thN

orm

anst

onSt

And

rew

sSt

Mar

gare

t'sW

hitto

nKe

ssin

glan

dBe

ccle

s So

uth

Pake

field

East

Fle

ggBe

ccle

s N

orth

Cai

ster

Sou

thBu

ngay

Wre

ntha

mC

arlto

nO

ulto

nBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Hal

esw

orth

Gor

lest

onW

est F

legg

Fleg

gbur

ghO

ulto

n Br

oad

Blyt

hing

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Orm

esby

Cai

ster

Nor

thTh

e Sa

ints

Wai

nfor

dSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Car

lton

Col

ville

Brad

wel

l Nor

thG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nW

orlin

gham

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


IMD

20

07

inc

om

e s

co

re



24Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Income Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAincome

0.27 to 0.60 (26)0.19 to 0.27 (27)0.13 to 0.19 (27)0.09 to 0.13 (27)0.04 to 0.09 (27)

The purpose of this domain is to capture the proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation in an area. This is constructed from Adults and children in Income Support Households (Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) 2005), Adults and children in Income-Based JSA Households (Source: DWP 2005), Adults and children in Pension Credit (Guarantee) Households (Source: DWP 2005), Adults and children in those Working Tax Credit households where there are children in receipt of Child Tax Credit whose equivalised income (excluding housing benefits) is below 60 per cent of the median before housing costs (Source: HMRC 2005), Adults and children in Child Tax Credit Households (who are not eligible for IS, Income-Based JSA, Pension Credit or Working Tax Credit) whose equivalised income (excluding housing benefits) is below 60 per cent of the median before housing costs (Source: HMRC 2005) and National Asylum Support Service (NASS) supported asylum seekers in England in receipt of subsistence support, accommodation support, or both (Source: NASS 2006). In addition, an Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index and an Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index were created. These two indices represent the proportion of children aged 0-15 living in income deprived households and the proportion of older people aged 60 and over living in income

deprived households respectively.

25Contents

IMD 2007 ward Health Deprivation and Disability Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 wardhealth deprivation & disability

0.47 to 1.28 (8)0.07 to 0.47 (8)

-0.13 to 0.07 (8)-0.26 to -0.13 (8)-0.74 to -0.26 (8)

The wards with the poorest health status are Nelson and Central and Northgate in Great Yarmouth and Kirkley and Harbour in Waveney.

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Nel

son

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Kirk

ley

Cla

ydon

Har

bour

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmYa

rmou

th N

orth

Nor

man

ston

Mag

dale

nSt

Mar

gare

t'sSt

And

rew

sW

hitto

nEa

st F

legg

Cai

ster

Nor

thC

aist

er S

outh

Kess

ingl

and

Pake

field

Oul

ton

Becc

les

Nor

thG

orle

ston

Becc

les

Sout

hBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Hal

esw

orth

Bung

ayO

rmes

byO

ulto

n Br

oad

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Car

lton

Wes

t Fle

ggFl

eggb

urgh

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Brad

wel

l Nor

thW

rent

ham

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nBl

ythi

ngW

orlin

gham

Wai

nfor

dTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


IMD

20

07

he

alt

h s

co

re



26Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Health Deprivation and Disability Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAhealth deprivation & disability

0.48 to 1.93 (26)0.17 to 0.48 (27)

-0.05 to 0.17 (27)-0.29 to -0.05 (27)-0.76 to -0.29 (27)

This domain measures rates of poor health, early mortality and disability in an area and covers the entire age range. This domain is constructed from Years of Potential Life Lost (YPLL) (2001 to 2005, Source: ONS), Comparative Illness and Disability Ratio (CIDR) (2005, Source: DWP), Measures of acute morbidity, derived from Hospital Episode Statistics (2004 to 2005, Source: Department of Health) and The proportion of adults under 60 suffering from mood or anxiety disorders based on prescribing (2005, Source: Prescribing Pricing Authority), Hospital Episode Statistics (2004 to 2005, Source: Department of Health) and Incapacity Benefit data (2005, Source: DWP).

27Contents

IMD 2007 ward Multiple Barriers to Housing and Services Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 wardbarriers to housing & services

23.51 to 52.23 (8)17.96 to 23.51 (7)15.27 to 17.96 (9)11.53 to 15.27 (7)7.71 to 11.53 (9)

In general, it is the urban areas which have the lowest levels of car ownership. However, the areas with least car ownership are also those nearest to essential services and jobs - suggesting a reduced need for car ownership. Service planning needs to take account of people who rely on public transport to access services. Half of households in Harbour ward in Waveney have no car - twice as many as the average for Waveney. The majority of households in Nelson do not have a car. This is also the ward with the highest level of long-term unemployment. Of note is that in this analysis, the most deprived areas - with the greatest health need - are those with the best geographical access to local services.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

The

Sain

tsW

rent

ham

Wai

nfor

dLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyBl

ythi

ngFl

eggb

urgh

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Cai

ster

Nor

thW

est F

legg

Gor

lest

onO

ulto

nC

arlto

nC

layd

onW

orlin

gham

Brad

wel

l Nor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleSt

Mar

gare

t'sH

ales

wor

thEa

st F

legg

Orm

esby

Nor

man

ston

Oul

ton

Broa

dPa

kefie

ldBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Cai

ster

Sou

thBe

ccle

s So

uth

Nel

son

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teM

agda

len

Bung

ayH

arbo

urKe

ssin

glan

dSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Kirk

ley

Yarm

outh

Nor

thBe

ccle

s N

orth

St A

ndre

ws

Whi

tton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


IMD

20

07

ac

ce

ss

sc

ore



28Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Multiple Barriers to Housing and Services Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAbarriers to housing & services

22.89 to 52.23 (26)15.61 to 22.89 (27)12.38 to 15.61 (27)10.19 to 12.38 (27)1.95 to 10.19 (27)

The purpose of this domain is to measure barriers to housing and key local services. The indicators are structured into two sub-domains: ‘geographical barriers’, and ‘wider barriers’ which includes issues relating to access to housing, such as affordability.

29Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Sub Domain: Geographical Barriers (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAgeographical barriers

0.66 to 2.68 (26)0.24 to 0.66 (27)

-0.09 to 0.24 (27)-0.56 to -0.09 (27)-1.91 to -0.56 (27)

The geographical barriers sub domain is constructed from Road distance to a GP surgery (Source: National Administrative Codes Service,2005), Road distance to a general stores or supermarket (Source: MapInfo Ltd, 2005), Road distance to a primary school (Source: DCFS, 2004-05) and Road distance to a Post Office or sub post office (Source: Post Office Ltd, 2005).

30Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Sub Domain: Wider Barriers (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAwider barriers

-0.09 to 0.31 (26)-0.28 to -0.09 (27)-0.44 to -0.28 (27)-0.61 to -0.44 (27)-1.14 to -0.61 (27)

The wider barriers sub domain includes issues relating to access to housing such as affordability. Constructed from Household overcrowding (Source: 2001 Census), LA level percentage of households for whom a decision on their application for assistance under the homeless provisions of housing legislation has been made, assigned to the constituent SOAs (Source: Communities and Local Government, 2005) and Difficulty of Access to owner-occupation (Source: modelled estimates produced by Heriot-Watt University, 2005).

31Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Employment Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAemployment

0.18 to 0.42 (26)0.13 to 0.18 (27)0.10 to 0.13 (27)0.08 to 0.10 (27)0.05 to 0.08 (27)

This domain measures employment deprivation conceptualised as involuntary exclusion of the working age population from the labour market. This domain is constructed from Recipients of Jobseekers Allowance (both contribution-based and income based): men aged 18-64 and women aged 18-59 (Source: DWP 2005), Recipients of Incapacity Benefit: men aged 18-64 and women aged 18-59 (Source: DWP 2005), Recipients of Severe Disablement Allowance: men aged 18-64 and women aged 18-59 (Source: DWP 2005), Participants in the New Deal for the 18-24s who are not in receipt of JSA (Source: DWP 2005), Participants in the New Deal for 25+ who are not in receipt of JSA (Source: DWP 2005) and Participants in the New Deal for Lone Parents (after initial interview) (Source: DWP 2005).

32Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Living Environment Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAliving environment

41.65 to 67.18 (26)22.98 to 41.65 (27)13.91 to 22.98 (27)7.47 to 13.91 (27)2.29 to 7.47 (27)

This domain focuses on deprivation with respect to the characteristics of the living environment. It comprises two sub-domains: the ‘indoors’ living environment which measures the quality of housing, and the ‘outdoors’ living environment which contains two measures about air quality and road traffic accidents.

33Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Sub-Domain: The ‘indoors’ living environment (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAindoors

55.22 to 86.65 (26)27.82 to 55.22 (27)15.62 to 27.82 (27)6.47 to 15.62 (27)0.40 to 6.47 (27)

This domain is constructed from Social and private housing in poor condition (2003 – 2005 average, Source BRE and Communities and Local Government, modelled EHCS) and Houses without central heating (Source: 2001 Census).

34Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Sub-Domain: The ‘outdoors’ living environment (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAoutdoors

18.61 to 50.27 (26)12.30 to 18.61 (27)8.97 to 12.30 (27)6.21 to 8.97 (27)2.08 to 6.21 (27)

This domain is constructed from Air quality (2005, Source: Geography Department at Staffordshire University and NAEI modelled at LSOA level) and Road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists (2003-2005 average, Source: DfT, STATS19 (Road Accident Data) smoothed to LSOA level).

35Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Crime Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAcrime

0.48 to 2.29 (26)-0.02 to 0.48 (27)-0.49 to -0.02 (27)-0.93 to -0.49 (27)-2.27 to -0.93 (27)

This domain measures the rate of recorded crime for four major crime types, representing the risk of personal and material victimisation at a small area level. This domain is constructed from Burglary (4 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for April 2004-March 2005, constrained to Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership (CDRP) level), Theft (5 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for April 2004-March 2005, constrained to CDRP level), Criminal damage (10 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for April 2004-March 2005, constrained to CDRP level) and Violence (14 recorded crime offence types including Robbery, Police Force data for April 2004-March 2005, constrained to CDRP level).

36Contents

% working population unemployed (NOMIS 2007)

More than 1 in 20 people in Great Yarmouth are unemployed. 1 in 8 people in Nelson are unemployed - six times higher than that for the East of England. Unemployment in Waveney is concentrated in the urban areas of Lowestoft I in 12 people are unemployed in Harbour and Kirkley wards of Waveney, well over twice the average for Waveney, where Waveney itself has higher levels of unemployment than England and 50% higher than for the East of England. Fleggburgh, Wainford and The Saints have notably high levels of employment (although the jobs are likely to be elsewhere). Areas of high unemployment have low car ownership, low home ownership and high levels of overcrowding. It is also a strong predictor of ill health.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Nel

son

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Har

bour

Kirk

ley

St A

ndre

ws

Nor

man

ston

Cla

ydon

Mag

dale

nYa

rmou

th N

orth

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Kess

ingl

and

Whi

tton

Pake

field

Cai

ster

Sou

thEa

st F

legg

Gor

lest

onO

ulto

n Br

oad

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Cai

ster

Nor

thBe

ccle

s So

uth

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Becc

les

Nor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleO

ulto

nO

rmes

byC

arlto

nH

ales

wor

thBu

ngay

Brad

wel

l Nor

thLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Wes

t Fle

ggW

rent

ham

St M

arga

ret's

Fleg

gbur

ghW

ainf

ord

Blyt

hing

Wor

lingh

amTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



37Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAeducation, skills & training

48.66 to 79.24 (26)32.92 to 48.66 (27)24.46 to 32.92 (27)19.00 to 24.46 (27)5.71 to 19.00 (27)

This domain captures the extent of deprivation in terms of education, skills and training in a local area. The indicators are structured into two sub domains: one relating to education deprivation for children/young people in the area, and one relating to lack of skills and qualifications among a sub-set of the working age adult population.

38Contents

% people aged 16 to 74 with socio-economic status "never worked or long term unemployed" (Census 2001)

9 in 10 unemployed residents in Nelson ward have either "never worked" or have been "long-term unemployed". The figure is between 7 and 8 in 10 for Great Yarmouth as a whole.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Nel

son

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmH

arbo

urC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teKi

rkle

yN

orm

anst

onSt

And

rew

sC

layd

onSt

Mar

gare

t'sM

agda

len

Yarm

outh

Nor

thO

ulto

nW

hitto

nC

aist

er S

outh

Gor

lest

onKe

ssin

glan

dEa

st F

legg

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Pake

field

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Orm

esby

Becc

les

Sout

hC

aist

er N

orth

Bung

ayG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nBe

ccle

s N

orth

Oul

ton

Broa

dW

rent

ham

Car

lton

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nW

est F

legg

Brad

wel

l Nor

thW

ainf

ord

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nBl

ythi

ngC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleFl

eggb

urgh

Hal

esw

orth

Wor

lingh

amTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



39Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Sub Domain: Skills (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAskills

44.28 to 87.67 (26)35.44 to 44.28 (27)26.63 to 35.44 (27)20.08 to 26.63 (27)5.09 to 20.08 (27)

Proportions of working age adults (aged 25-54) in the area with no or low qualifications (Source: 2001 Census)

40Contents

% people aged 16 to 74 with socio-economic status "higher managerial and professional occupations" (Census 2001)

Great Yarmouth has about half as many Managers and Professionals as the East of England. Even Fleggburgh - which has the highest proportion in Great Yarmouth - still has a lower proportion than that of England and the East of England. The Managers and Professionals are more likely to live in the villages. However, Gorleston has a high proportion as well.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Nel

son

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmC

layd

onN

orm

anst

onH

arbo

urYa

rmou

th N

orth

Becc

les

Sout

hC

aist

er S

outh

St A

ndre

ws

St M

arga

ret's

Whi

tton

Kirk

ley

Kess

ingl

and

Hal

esw

orth

Pake

field

Cai

ster

Nor

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Brad

wel

l Nor

thM

agda

len

Wes

t Fle

ggO

ulto

n Br

oad

Car

lton

East

Fle

ggLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBu

ngay

Becc

les

Nor

thO

ulto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleO

rmes

bySo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Wre

ntha

mW

orlin

gham

Fleg

gbur

ghG

orle

ston

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

The

Sain

tsBl

ythi

ngG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nW

ainf

ord

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



41Contents

IMD 2007 LSOA Sub Domain: Children/young people (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 LSOAchildren & young people

51.81 to 77.57 (26)31.68 to 51.81 (27)22.97 to 31.68 (27)15.95 to 22.97 (27)6.33 to 15.95 (27)

Average test score of pupils at Key Stage 2 (2 year weighted average, 2004-2005, Source: Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF)), Average test score of pupils at Key Stage 3 (2 year weighted average, 2004-2005, Source: DCSF), Best of 8 average capped points score at Key Stage 4 (this includes results of GCSEs, GNVQs and other vocational equivalents) (2 year weighted average,

2004-2005, Source: DCSF), Proportion of young people not staying on in school or non-advanced education above the age of 16, Source: HMRC Child Benefit (CB) data, Secondary school absence rate (2 year average 2004-2005, Source: DCSF) and Proportion of those aged under 21 not entering higher education (5 year average, 2001-2005, Source: Universities and Colleges Admission Service (UCAS), Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)).

42Contents

% residents aged 16-74 with no qualifications (Census 2001)

Great Yarmouth has high proportion of adults with no qualifications. Waveney also has an above average proportion of adults with no qualifications. Every ward in Great Yarmouth has more unqualified 16- 74 year olds than the East of England or England. This will have a significant impact on employment prospects.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Nel

son

St M

arga

ret's

Whi

tton

Yarm

outh

Nor

thM

agda

len

Cla

ydon

Nor

man

ston

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Cai

ster

Sou

thPa

kefie

ldKe

ssin

glan

dSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Becc

les

Sout

hEa

st F

legg

Oul

ton

Broa

dC

aist

er N

orth

Kirk

ley

Har

bour

Hal

esw

orth

Wes

t Fle

ggSt

And

rew

sO

rmes

byBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Brad

wel

l Nor

thO

ulto

nLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBu

ngay

Wre

ntha

mBl

ythi

ngC

arlto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Becc

les

Nor

thFl

eggb

urgh

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

The

Sain

tsC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleG

orle

ston

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Wor

lingh

amW

ainf

ord

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



43Contents

% households with children under 5 (Census 2001)

When compared with all households with children, those households with children under 5 years are more common in the deprived wards around the port of great Yarmouth. This suggests a particular economic vulnerability for these younger children. Children are also more likely to be found in the deprived central wards in Waveney. However, Worlingham and Carlton Colville also have higher proportions. The geographic distribution of young children contrasts with that of the over 65 year olds who are more likely to live in the wards with fewer children.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmC

arlto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleH

arbo

urSt

And

rew

sN

orm

anst

onO

ulto

nW

orlin

gham

Kirk

ley

Cla

ydon

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Nel

son

Brad

wel

l Nor

thTh

e Sa

ints

Bung

ayFl

eggb

urgh

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

St M

arga

ret's

Becc

les

Sout

hO

rmes

byM

agda

len

Wes

t Fle

ggBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Cai

ster

Nor

thYa

rmou

th N

orth

Blyt

hing

Whi

tton

Wre

ntha

mKe

ssin

glan

dEa

st F

legg

Wai

nfor

dBe

ccle

s N

orth

Pake

field

Hal

esw

orth

Cai

ster

Sou

thG

orle

ston

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Oul

ton

Broa

dSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



44Contents

IMD 2007 ward Sub Domain: Children/young people (DCLG 2007)

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

IMD 2007 wardchildren & young people

41.73 to 73.80 (8)27.28 to 41.73 (7)21.07 to 27.28 (8)15.52 to 21.07 (9)10.73 to 15.52 (8)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Nel

son

Mag

dale

nSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Nor

man

ston

Kirk

ley

Har

bour

Yarm

outh

Nor

thW

hitto

nC

layd

onBe

ccle

s So

uth

St M

arga

ret's

St A

ndre

ws

Pake

field

Car

lton

Kess

ingl

and

Cai

ster

Sou

thBl

ythi

ngC

aist

er N

orth

Bung

ayC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleH

ales

wor

thW

rent

ham

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Brad

wel

l Nor

thO

ulto

nO

ulto

n Br

oad

Becc

les

Nor

thEa

st F

legg

Wor

lingh

amG

orle

ston

Wes

t Fle

ggFl

eggb

urgh

Wai

nfor

dO

rmes

byG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nTh

e Sa

ints

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


IMD

20

07

ch

ildre

n/y

ou

ng

pe

op

le s

co

re



45Contents

% households with one or more dependent children (Census 2001)

Great Yarmouth and Waveney both have a below average proportion of households with dependent children compared to East of England and England. Within Great Yarmouth Southtown and Cobholm has the highest proportion of households with dependent children and in Waveney it is Carlton Colville. Southtown and Cobholm is one of the more deprived wards and Carlton Colville is one of the least deprived.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Car

lton

Col

ville

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thC

arlto

nO

ulto

nW

ainf

ord

Fleg

gbur

ghW

orlin

gham

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Brad

wel

l Nor

thKi

rkle

ySt

And

rew

sN

orm

anst

onW

est F

legg

The

Sain

tsSt

Mar

gare

t'sM

agda

len

Har

bour

Becc

les

Sout

hC

layd

onYa

rmou

th N

orth

Nel

son

Wre

ntha

mBl

ythi

ngBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Orm

esby

Kess

ingl

and

Bung

ayW

hitto

nEa

st F

legg

Cai

ster

Nor

thG

orle

ston

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Pake

field

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Cai

ster

Sou

thH

ales

wor

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

Becc

les

Nor

thSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



46Contents

% households with dependent children in which no adult has employment (Census 2001)

Compared to East of England Great Yarmouth and Waveney both have a higher proportion of households with dependent children and no adult in employment. Within Great Yarmouth and Waveney Nelson, Southtown and Cobholm, Harbour and Normanston have the highest number of households with dependent children and no adult in employment.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Nel

son

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmH

arbo

urN

orm

anst

onKi

rkle

yC

layd

onSt

Mar

gare

t'sM

agda

len

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Yarm

outh

Nor

thSt

And

rew

sW

hitto

nKe

ssin

glan

dC

arlto

nBe

ccle

s So

uth

Wre

ntha

mC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleBu

ngay

Oul

ton

Fleg

gbur

ghBl

ythi

ngBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Pake

field

Cai

ster

Sou

thLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thW

est F

legg

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

East

Fle

ggC

aist

er N

orth

Oul

ton

Broa

dW

ainf

ord

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nW

orlin

gham

Becc

les

Nor

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

Orm

esby

Hal

esw

orth

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gor

lest

onTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



47Contents

% households with lone parents and dependent children (Census 2001)

In Great Yarmouth and Waveney for those households with dependent children, in about 1 in 5 the children are cared for by a lone-parent. This is a little less than the average for England, but worse than that for the East of England and the rest of Norfolk and Suffolk. In Nelson and Harbour wards about 1 in 3 households with dependent children are single parent households.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Nel

son

Har

bour

Cla

ydon

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmKi

rkle

yN

orm

anst

onSt

And

rew

sM

agda

len

St M

arga

ret's

Car

lton

Yarm

outh

Nor

thC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teBu

ngay

Kess

ingl

and

Car

lton

Col

ville

Whi

tton

Fleg

gbur

ghC

aist

er N

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Pake

field

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nO

ulto

nC

aist

er S

outh

Wre

ntha

mLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBe

ccle

s So

uth

Blyt

hing

Becc

les

Nor

thW

est F

legg

Oul

ton

Broa

dH

ales

wor

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

Wai

nfor

dG

orle

ston

Wor

lingh

amTh

e Sa

ints

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nEa

st F

legg

Orm

esby

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



48Contents

% households with female lone parent who is unemployed (Census 2001)

In Great Yarmouth and Waveney about 90% of lone parent households are female lone parent households. Unemployed female lone parent households indicate a particular economic vulnerability.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmN

elso

nYa

rmou

th N

orth

Nor

man

ston

Kirk

ley

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Oul

ton

Broa

dH

arbo

urBl

ythi

ngSt

Mar

gare

t'sM

agda

len

Kess

ingl

and

Car

lton

Becc

les

Sout

hC

layd

onW

hitto

nG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nW

est F

legg

St A

ndre

ws

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nW

rent

ham

Orm

esby

Pake

field

Bung

aySo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Cai

ster

Sou

thFl

eggb

urgh

Oul

ton

Wai

nfor

dLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thW

orlin

gham

Brad

wel

l Nor

thC

aist

er N

orth

East

Fle

ggLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyTh

e Sa

ints

Hal

esw

orth

Car

lton

Col

ville

Becc

les

Nor

thG

orle

ston

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



49Contents

Full time students aged 16 to 17 per 1000 population aged 16-17 (Census 2001)

This indicator reflects the number of students continuing their education beyond GSCEs. Great Yarmouth and Waveney both have a below average proportion of full time students aged 16-17 compared to the national average. However, the prosperous wards of Bradwell North, Ormesby, Caister North, Gorleston Worlingham, Ditchingham and Southwold have values above the national average.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmYa

rmou

th N

orth

Nor

man

ston

Nel

son

Mag

dale

nSt

Mar

gare

t'sW

hitto

nKi

rkle

yC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teC

layd

onH

arbo

urSt

And

rew

sC

aist

er S

outh

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nBe

ccle

s So

uth

Cai

ster

Nor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

llePa

kefie

ldH

ales

wor

thEa

st F

legg

Brad

wel

l Nor

thW

est F

legg

Kess

ingl

and

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Oul

ton

Gor

lest

onC

arlto

nFl

eggb

urgh

Bung

ayO

ulto

n Br

oad

Becc

les

Nor

thO

rmes

byW

orlin

gham

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nW

rent

ham

Blyt

hing

Wai

nfor

dTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


nu

mb

er

pe

r 1

00

0 p

op

ula

tio

n a

ge

d 1

6-1

7



50Contents

Conception rate per 1000 females aged 15-17 (DOH 2002-2004)

Teenage pregnancy is a significant public health issue in England. Teenage parents are prone to poor antenatal health, lower birth weight babies and higher infant mortality rates. Teenage mothers are less likely to finish their education, less likely to find a good job, and more likely to end up as single parents or bringing up their children in poverty. Children born to teenage mothers run a much greater risk of poor health and have a much higher chance of becoming teenage mothers themselves. However, it is worth remembering that many young people are successful in adapting to the role of parenthood and have happy, healthy children. Great Yarmouth and Waveney both have teenage conception rates higher than the ONS cluster, East of England and England averages. There are 8 wards which have no reported teenage pregnancies at all (either due to no teenage conceptions or due to disclosure issues). The rates are higher in all the more deprived wards.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Har

bour

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Nel

son

Cla

ydon

St A

ndre

ws

Nor

man

ston

Yarm

outh

Nor

thKi

rkle

yM

agda

len

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmC

aist

er S

outh

Whi

tton

Bung

ayC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleC

arlto

nG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nC

aist

er N

orth

St M

arga

ret's

Wre

ntha

mW

est F

legg

Becc

les

Nor

thBe

ccle

s So

uth

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nW

ainf

ord

Oul

ton

Broa

dEa

st F

legg

Brad

wel

l Nor

thLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thH

ales

wor

thPa

kefie

ldG

orle

ston

Kess

ingl

and

Blyt

hing

Fleg

gbur

ghLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyO

rmes

byO

ulto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

The

Sain

tsW

orlin

gham

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


rate

pe

r 1

00

0 f

em

ale

s a

ge

d 1

5-1

7



51Contents

% single person households (Census 2001)

Single-person households (of all ages) are heavily concentrated in some of the deprived central wards - with proportions up to three times higher than the wards with the lowest proportion. The wards with a high proportion of single-person households are also those with a high prevalence of overcrowding and a high proportion of Council Tax Band A properties (see later pages). This suggests a combination of small and cheap accommodation where people with low income can afford to live. In the more deprived central wards of Lowestoft and Great Yarmouth the proportion of single-person non pensioner households is greater than the proportion of single-person pensioner households.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Nel

son

Har

bour

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Becc

les

Nor

thSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Kirk

ley

Cla

ydon

Hal

esw

orth

Pake

field

Bung

aySo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

St A

ndre

ws

Gor

lest

onN

orm

anst

onYa

rmou

th N

orth

Mag

dale

nC

aist

er S

outh

Oul

ton

Broa

dBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

St M

arga

ret's

Cai

ster

Nor

thBe

ccle

s So

uth

Kess

ingl

and

East

Fle

ggW

hitto

nW

rent

ham

Wes

t Fle

ggO

rmes

byG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyFl

eggb

urgh

Blyt

hing

Wor

lingh

amO

ulto

nC

arlto

nBr

adw

ell N

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Car

lton

Col

ville

The

Sain

tsW

ainf

ord

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



52Contents

% single person non pensioner households (Census 2001)

Single-person non pensioner households are heavily concentrated in some of the deprived central wards Nelson, Harbour, Central and Northgate and Southtown and Cobholm. The wards with a high proportion of single-person non pensioner households are also those with a high prevalence of overcrowding and a high proportion of Council Tax Band A properties (see later pages). This suggests a combination of small and cheap accommodation where people with low income can afford to live. There appears to be no association between single-person non pensioner households and single-person pensioner households.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Nel

son

Har

bour

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmKi

rkle

yC

layd

onSt

And

rew

sN

orm

anst

onBu

ngay

Becc

les

Nor

thG

orle

ston

Pake

field

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Cai

ster

Nor

thC

arlto

nH

ales

wor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleO

ulto

n Br

oad

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBe

ccle

s So

uth

Fleg

gbur

ghEa

st F

legg

Wre

ntha

mBl

ythi

ngSt

Mar

gare

t'sO

rmes

byBr

adw

ell N

orth

Wes

t Fle

ggM

agda

len

Kess

ingl

and

Cai

ster

Sou

thTh

e Sa

ints

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nW

orlin

gham

Yarm

outh

Nor

thW

hitto

nW

ainf

ord

Oul

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



53Contents

% households with single pensioners (Census 2001)

Great Yarmouth and Waveney has a high proportion of single pensioner households - 1 in 6 households. This is higher than Norfolk, East of England and England. In Yarmouth North, over 1 in 5 are single pensioner households. In Southwold, nearly a third of households are single pensioner households.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nH

ales

wor

thBe

ccle

s N

orth

Pake

field

Yarm

outh

Nor

thM

agda

len

Gor

lest

onC

aist

er S

outh

Bung

ayC

layd

onKe

ssin

glan

dKi

rkle

yO

ulto

n Br

oad

Nel

son

Har

bour

St M

arga

ret's

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teW

hitto

nBe

ccle

s So

uth

East

Fle

ggSt

And

rew

sC

aist

er N

orth

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Wes

t Fle

ggO

rmes

byN

orm

anst

onW

rent

ham

Oul

ton

Wor

lingh

amFl

eggb

urgh

Blyt

hing

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmBr

adw

ell N

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

The

Sain

tsC

arlto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

ainf

ord

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



54Contents

Residents providing unpaid care per 1000 population (Census 2001)

The proportion of people providing unpaid care is highest in those areas where there is the highest proportion of people over the age of 65 years. This indicates that people are likely to be providing care for the elderly. Nearly 1 in 8 people in Gorleston, Oulton, Walberswick and Southwold are providing unpaid care. Wainford has a surprisingly high level of dependency.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Oul

ton

Broa

dKe

ssin

glan

dG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nG

orle

ston

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nPa

kefie

ldW

ainf

ord

Oul

ton

East

Fle

ggW

hitto

nC

aist

er S

outh

Mag

dale

nW

est F

legg

Wre

ntha

mBe

ccle

s N

orth

St M

arga

ret's

Brad

wel

l Nor

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Car

lton

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Cai

ster

Nor

thYa

rmou

th N

orth

Orm

esby

Fleg

gbur

ghW

orlin

gham

Hal

esw

orth

Cla

ydon

Blyt

hing

St A

ndre

ws

The

Sain

tsLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyN

orm

anst

onC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleBe

ccle

s So

uth

Kirk

ley

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Nel

son

Bung

aySo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Har

bour

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


nu

mb

er

pe

r 1

00

0 p

op

ula

tio

n



55Contents

% households with no car or van (Census 2001)

The majority of households in Nelson, Great Yarmouth do not have a car. Half of households in Harbour ward have no car - twice as many as the average for Waveney. These are also the wards with the highest level of long-term unemployment. However, the areas with least car ownership are also in the urban areas nearest to essential services and jobs - suggesting a reduced need for car ownership. Service planning needs to take account of people who rely on public transport to access services.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Nel

son

Har

bour

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Kirk

ley

Cla

ydon

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmN

orm

anst

onM

agda

len

St A

ndre

ws

Yarm

outh

Nor

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sBe

ccle

s N

orth

Pake

field

Whi

tton

Cai

ster

Sou

thKe

ssin

glan

dG

orle

ston

Hal

esw

orth

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nO

ulto

n Br

oad

Bung

ayBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Becc

les

Sout

hC

aist

er N

orth

Oul

ton

East

Fle

ggG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nBr

adw

ell N

orth

Car

lton

Wes

t Fle

ggFl

eggb

urgh

Orm

esby

Blyt

hing

Wre

ntha

mC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thW

orlin

gham

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Wai

nfor

dTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



56Contents

% houses marked as council tax band A (Census 2001)

Council tax "Band A" refers to properties which were valued at £40,000 or less based on an open market value as at 1st April 1991. This is the band for the least expensive properties. Nearly all properties in Harbour, Normanston and Kirkley are Band A. These areas also have high numbers of households with children.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

East

Fle

ggH

arbo

urN

elso

nSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Nor

man

ston

Kirk

ley

Cla

ydon

Orm

esby

St A

ndre

ws

Yarm

outh

Nor

thKe

ssin

glan

dM

agda

len

St M

arga

ret's

Whi

tton

Pake

field

Becc

les

Nor

thBu

ngay

Hal

esw

orth

Gor

lest

onW

rent

ham

Becc

les

Sout

hLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBl

ythi

ngO

ulto

n Br

oad

Cai

ster

Sou

thC

arlto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

est F

legg

Brad

wel

l Nor

thO

ulto

nBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Wai

nfor

dFl

eggb

urgh

Wor

lingh

amG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

The

Sain

tsC

aist

er N

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



57Contents

% households rated as overcrowded (Census 2001)

The proportion of households rated as overcrowded fairs well against figures from England and the East of England. However, Nelson, Central, Northgate, Harbour and Kirkley all have high levels of overcrowding. It should not be a surprise that these areas have the cheapest housing (Council tax Band A) and also have the highest levels of long-term unemployment, the highest levels of self-reported ill health, the highest proportion of the population with no qualifications. It is worrying to note that these areas also have some of the highest proportion of households with children.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Nel

son

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Har

bour

Kirk

ley

Mag

dale

nC

layd

onSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Nor

man

ston

Yarm

outh

Nor

thBu

ngay

St A

ndre

ws

Gor

lest

onBe

ccle

s So

uth

Pake

field

Blyt

hing

Becc

les

Nor

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nC

arlto

nW

hitto

nW

rent

ham

Kess

ingl

and

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Hal

esw

orth

The

Sain

tsO

ulto

n Br

oad

Cai

ster

Nor

thO

ulto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

est F

legg

Cai

ster

Sou

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

East

Fle

ggFl

eggb

urgh

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Wai

nfor

dG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nO

rmes

byW

orlin

gham

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



58Contents

% population reporting limiting long term illness (Census 2001)

One might expect that the areas with the highest proportion of elderly to report the highest levels of ill health. However, whilst these areas (for example, Caister South, Gorleston and Yarmouth North) do report high levels, the highest levels are reported from the areas with the highest long-term unemployment (Nelson, Claydon, Central and Northgate, Magdalen). Southwold and Reydon ward has the highest level of self-reported "limiting long-term illness" - nearly 1 in 4 people. The pattern of self-reported illness closely follows that of areas with high numbers of elderly people.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Nel

son

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nPa

kefie

ldC

layd

onKe

ssin

glan

dM

agda

len

Becc

les

Nor

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

Cai

ster

Sou

thYa

rmou

th N

orth

Kirk

ley

St M

arga

ret's

Har

bour

Hal

esw

orth

Whi

tton

Nor

man

ston

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

East

Fle

ggG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nG

orle

ston

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nW

est F

legg

Cai

ster

Nor

thBu

ngay

St A

ndre

ws

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmO

rmes

byBl

ythi

ngBe

ccle

s So

uth

Wre

ntha

mO

ulto

nLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyBr

adw

ell N

orth

Fleg

gbur

ghC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

orlin

gham

Car

lton

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

The

Sain

tsW

ainf

ord

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



59Contents

% population feeling in poor health (Census 2001)

One might expect that the areas with the highest proportion of elderly to report the highest levels of ill health. However, whilst these areas (for example, Caister South, Gorleston and Yarmouth North) do report high levels, the highest levels are reported from the areas with the highest long-term unemployment (Nelson, Claydon, Central and Northgate, Magdalen).

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Nel

son

Cla

ydon

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Mag

dale

nH

arbo

urPa

kefie

ldKe

ssin

glan

dKi

rkle

ySt

Mar

gare

t'sEa

st F

legg

Cai

ster

Sou

thN

orm

anst

onYa

rmou

th N

orth

Whi

tton

Gor

lest

onBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmC

aist

er N

orth

Hal

esw

orth

Wes

t Fle

ggSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Becc

les

Nor

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

St A

ndre

ws

Orm

esby

Fleg

gbur

ghLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyBe

ccle

s So

uth

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Bung

ayBl

ythi

ngBr

adw

ell N

orth

Oul

ton

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Wre

ntha

mC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

orlin

gham

Car

lton

The

Sain

tsW

ainf

ord

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



60Contents

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

% overweight or obese 2007year 6

40.0 to 50.0 (8)32.1 to 40.0 (8)28.9 to 32.1 (7)24.0 to 28.9 (9)14.3 to 24.0 (8)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Fleg

gbur

ghW

rent

ham

Orm

esby

Nel

son

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmEa

st F

legg

Becc

les

Nor

thW

orlin

gham

Cai

ster

Nor

thC

layd

onKe

ssin

glan

dW

hitto

nH

arbo

urBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

St M

arga

ret's

Car

lton

Col

ville

Mag

dale

nW

ainf

ord

Becc

les

Sout

hBu

ngay

The

Sain

tsYa

rmou

th N

orth

Oul

ton

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Gor

lest

onKi

rkle

yW

est F

legg

Car

lton

Hal

esw

orth

Cai

ster

Sou

thSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Blyt

hing

Nor

man

ston

St A

ndre

ws

Pake

field

Oul

ton

Broa

dBr

adw

ell N

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



% children overweight or obese in year 6 (NCOD 2007)

Childhood obesity is closely linked with early onset of preventable disease, including diabetes. In October 2007, the Government set a new long-term ambition to tackle obesity. The initial focus will be on children: by 2020, we aim to reduce the proportion of overweight and obese children to 2000 levels. Great Yarmouth has proportionately more overweight or obese Year 6 children than Waveney. Nelson is the only ward where the proportion of overweight or obese children in Year 6 is significantly higher than the Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT average. The map shows that there is little link between deprivation and obesity. This is also seen in an analysis of childhood obesity at the larger MSOA level that covers Waveney and Norfolk.

61Contents

St Margaret's

Harbour

Normanston

Gunton & Corton

Bungay

Beccles South

Oulton

Carlton

Oulton Broad

Lothingland Waveney

Beccles North

Kirkley

Whitton

Pakefield

Carlton Colville


Gorleston

Magdalen

St Andrews

Claydon

Nelson

Southtown & Cobholm

Central & Northgate

Yarmouth North

Bradwell North

Caister South

Worlingham


Fleggburgh

Caister North

Kessingland

Wainford


Wrentham

Blything

East Flegg

Ormesby

West Flegg

The Saints

% overweight or obese 2007year reception

28.4 to 38.3 (8)25.0 to 28.4 (8)23.3 to 25.0 (8)19.7 to 23.3 (8)5.8 to 19.7 (8)

% children overweight or obese in reception (NCOD 2007)

Childhood obesity is closely linked with early onset of preventable disease, including diabetes. In October 2007, the Government set a new long-term ambition to tackle obesity. The initial focus will be on children: by 2020, we aim to reduce the proportion of overweight and obese children to 2000 levels. Great Yarmouth has proportionately more overweight or obese Year Reception children than Waveney. There are no wards where the proportion of overweight or obese children in Year Reception is significantly higher than the Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT average. The map shows that there is little link between deprivation and obesity. This is also seen in an analysis of childhood obesity at the larger MSOA level that covers Waveney and Norfolk.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Yarm

outh

Nor

thM

agda

len

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmEa

st F

legg

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Fleg

gbur

ghH

arbo

urBu

ngay

Cai

ster

Nor

thW

est F

legg

The

Sain

tsBe

ccle

s So

uth

Car

lton

Col

ville

Kess

ingl

and

Wai

nfor

dKi

rkle

yPa

kefie

ldC

layd

onN

elso

nBl

ythi

ngBe

ccle

s N

orth

Wor

lingh

amO

ulto

nSt

Mar

gare

t'sW

rent

ham

Gor

lest

onO

rmes

byLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teO

ulto

n Br

oad

Nor

man

ston

Hal

esw

orth

Whi

tton

St A

ndre

ws

Brad

wel

l Nor

thG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nC

arlto

nC

aist

er S

outh

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



62Contents

Synthetic estimates of lifestyle factors sum of ward rankings (NatCen 2000-2002)

Lifestyle synthetic estimates are derived from models based on the characteristics of the ward. This gives a picture how healthy the characteristics of the wards are. Southtown and Cobholm is the least healthy and Gunton and Corton is the most healthy.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmN

elso

nC

layd

onC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teBe

ccle

s So

uth

Har

bour

St A

ndre

ws

St M

arga

ret's

Yarm

outh

Nor

thW

hitto

nN

orm

anst

onKe

ssin

glan

dM

agda

len

Car

lton

Col

ville

Car

lton

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Kirk

ley

Wes

t Fle

ggC

aist

er S

outh

East

Fle

ggBu

ngay

Cai

ster

Nor

thH

ales

wor

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nPa

kefie

ldFl

eggb

urgh

Orm

esby

Oul

ton

Oul

ton

Broa

dW

rent

ham

Becc

les

Nor

thTh

e Sa

ints

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Wai

nfor

dW

orlin

gham

Gor

lest

onBl

ythi

ngSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


Su

m o

f ra

nk

s



63Contents

Smoking synthetic estimate (NatCen 2000-2002)

Lifestyle synthetic estimates are derived from models based on the characteristics of the ward. The synthetic smoking estimate indicates that Nelson ward has the highest smoking prevalence and Gunton and Corton has the lowest smoking prevalence.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Nel

son

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmH

arbo

urC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teN

orm

anst

onC

layd

onKi

rkle

ySt

And

rew

sW

hitto

nM

agda

len

St M

arga

ret's

Becc

les

Sout

hYa

rmou

th N

orth

Kess

ingl

and

Cai

ster

Nor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleC

aist

er S

outh

Car

lton

Pake

field

Bung

ayO

rmes

byW

est F

legg

Becc

les

Nor

thH

ales

wor

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Fleg

gbur

ghEa

st F

legg

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Oul

ton

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nBl

ythi

ngW

rent

ham

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Brad

wel

l Nor

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

Wor

lingh

amTh

e Sa

ints

Gor

lest

onW

ainf

ord

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



64Contents

Obesity synthetic estimate (NatCen 2000-2002)

Lifestyle synthetic estimates are derived from models based on the characteristics of the ward. Obesity is a growing problem with impacts on the rates of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Most of the wards in Great Yarmouth and Waveney have obesity estimates greater than the England average. The synthetic obesity estimate indicates that St Margaret's ward has the highest obesity prevalence and Wainford has the lowest obesity prevalence.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

St M

arga

ret's

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmBe

ccle

s So

uth

Hal

esw

orth

Kess

ingl

and

Nel

son

East

Fle

ggW

est F

legg

Bung

ayC

layd

onC

arlto

nLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thO

ulto

n Br

oad

Yarm

outh

Nor

thW

hitto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleN

orm

anst

onO

rmes

byC

aist

er S

outh

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Mag

dale

nO

ulto

nC

aist

er N

orth

Becc

les

Nor

thSt

And

rew

sBr

adw

ell N

orth

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nFl

eggb

urgh

Har

bour

Pake

field

Kirk

ley

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nW

orlin

gham

Gor

lest

onBl

ythi

ngG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nW

rent

ham

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

The

Sain

tsW

ainf

ord

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



65Contents

Adult 5 a day fruit and vegetable consumption synthetic estimate (NatCen 2000-2002)

The synthetic estimate is a measure of a protective lifestyle factor. A diet rich in fruit and vegetables confers protective effects against the development of heart disease and certain cancers. It has been estimated that eating at least 5 portions of a variety of fruit and vegetables a day could reduce the risk of deaths from chronic diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and cancer by up to 20%. Harbour has the lowest prevalence of healthy eating and Southwold and Reydon has the highest.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Har

bour

Kirk

ley

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmN

elso

nW

hitto

nN

orm

anst

onC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teSt

Mar

gare

t'sBe

ccle

s So

uth

Car

lton

Col

ville

Car

lton

Cla

ydon

Kess

ingl

and

Mag

dale

nPa

kefie

ldBu

ngay

Yarm

outh

Nor

thH

ales

wor

thLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thSt

And

rew

sW

rent

ham

Oul

ton

Cai

ster

Nor

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Oul

ton

Broa

dW

est F

legg

East

Fle

ggBr

adw

ell N

orth

Becc

les

Nor

thC

aist

er S

outh

Fleg

gbur

ghW

orlin

gham

Wai

nfor

dBl

ythi

ngLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyTh

e Sa

ints

Gor

lest

onO

rmes

byG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



66Contents

Child 3 a day fruit and vegetable consumption synthetic estimate (NatCen 2000-2002)

The synthetic estimate is a measure of a protective lifestyle factor. A diet rich in fruit and vegetables confers protective effects against the development of heart disease and certain cancers. It has been estimated that eating at least 5 portions of a variety of fruit and vegetables a day could reduce the risk of deaths from chronic diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and cancer by up to 20%. All wards have child healthy eating prevalence less than the England average. This indicates that their may be future human and health service costs for Great Yarmouth and Waveney.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmYa

rmou

th N

orth

Cai

ster

Sou

thM

agda

len

Brad

wel

l Nor

thC

aist

er N

orth

Whi

tton

Nel

son

Becc

les

Sout

hKe

ssin

glan

dSt

And

rew

sC

layd

onBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Car

lton

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Wes

t Fle

ggH

ales

wor

thEa

st F

legg

Fleg

gbur

ghO

rmes

byH

arbo

urPa

kefie

ldSt

Mar

gare

t'sN

orm

anst

onC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleTh

e Sa

ints

Oul

ton

Broa

dBu

ngay

Wor

lingh

amBe

ccle

s N

orth

Gor

lest

onW

rent

ham

Wai

nfor

dKi

rkle

yBl

ythi

ngLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Oul

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



67Contents

Binge drinking synthetic estimate (NatCen 2000-2002)

Lifestyle synthetic estimates are derived from models based on the characteristics of the ward. Binge drinking leads to a range of public health issues such as violence and accidents, alcoholic poisoning. High alcohol consumption is implicated in stomach and throat cancer and liver failure. The majority of wards in Great Yarmouth and Waveney have binge drinking estimates less than the England average. The synthetic binge drinking estimate indicates that Southtown and Cobholm ward has the highest prevalence and Southwold and Reydon has the lowest prevalence.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmH

arbo

urSt

And

rew

sC

layd

onC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thKi

rkle

yTh

e Sa

ints

East

Fle

ggLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyN

elso

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

ainf

ord

Wes

t Fle

ggC

aist

er S

outh

Fleg

gbur

ghBe

ccle

s So

uth

Wre

ntha

mBr

adw

ell N

orth

Bung

ayN

orm

anst

onYa

rmou

th N

orth

Gor

lest

onO

ulto

nSt

Mar

gare

t'sC

arlto

nBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Cai

ster

Nor

thO

rmes

byW

orlin

gham

Mag

dale

nBl

ythi

ngH

ales

wor

thW

hitto

nPa

kefie

ldBe

ccle

s N

orth

Kess

ingl

and

Oul

ton

Broa

dG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


%



68Contents

10 year predicted risk CVD > 20% directly standardised rate per 100000 aged 35-74 (Practice databases 2005)

One of the core standards for the national service frameworks is to identify patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. The risk can be measured as the chance that a person will have a heart attack or stroke in the next 10 years. Joint British Society guidelines say that if this chance is greater than 1 in 5 then action should be taken. This should include lifestyle advice and drug therapy if appropriate. Compare this to the rates for CHD or Stroke registers.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

Nel

son

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thC

aist

er N

orth

Yarm

outh

Nor

thC

layd

onH

arbo

urEa

st F

legg

Cai

ster

Sou

thSt

And

rew

sN

orm

anst

onBr

adw

ell N

orth

Kirk

ley

Wes

t Fle

ggBe

ccle

s So

uth

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nM

agda

len

Orm

esby

St M

arga

ret's

Whi

tton

Bung

ayBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Pake

field

Kess

ingl

and

Becc

les

Nor

thG

orle

ston

Car

lton

Col

ville

Hal

esw

orth

Wor

lingh

amW

rent

ham

Blyt

hing

Oul

ton

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Car

lton

Wai

nfor

dO

ulto

n Br

oad

The

Sain

tsG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nFl

eggb

urgh

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

ag

ed

35

-74



69Contents

CHD or Stroke register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages (Practice databases 2005)

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) which includes CHD and stroke is the biggest killer in our society and the burden from this disease is massive: 2002 238,000 people died from CVD. CVD accounted for 39% of all deaths, half of them are caused by Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). The total costs for CHD were estimated at more than £7 billion in 1999. (Petersen S, Peto V and Rayner M (2004): Coronary heart disease statistics. BHF, London). Cardiovascular disease is closely related to all of the well-known risk factors such as smoking, obesity and alcohol and fairness in the delivery of services for heart patients is a public health issue which is under close scrutiny.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Nel

son

Kess

ingl

and

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Har

bour

East

Fle

ggO

rmes

byC

layd

onC

aist

er N

orth

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

Yarm

outh

Nor

thM

agda

len

Whi

tton

Car

lton

Col

ville

Pake

field

Wes

t Fle

ggBl

ythi

ngN

orm

anst

onO

ulto

nO

ulto

n Br

oad

Kirk

ley

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nSt

And

rew

sLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyBu

ngay

Cai

ster

Sou

thH

ales

wor

thC

arlto

nSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

St M

arga

ret's

Gor

lest

onBe

ccle

s So

uth

Wai

nfor

dBe

ccle

s N

orth

The

Sain

tsW

rent

ham

Wor

lingh

amG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nFl

eggb

urgh

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

all

ag

es



70Contents

CHD register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages (Practice databases 2005)

CVD accounted for 39% of all deaths, half of them are caused by Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). The total costs for CHD were estimated at more than £7 billion in 1999. (Petersen S, Peto V and Rayner M (2004): Coronary heart disease statistics. BHF, London). Cardiovascular disease is closely related to all of the well-known risk factors such as smoking, obesity and alcohol and fairness in the delivery of services for heart patients is a public health issue which is under close scrutiny.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Orm

esby

Nel

son

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Kess

ingl

and

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teC

aist

er N

orth

Har

bour

East

Fle

ggC

layd

onBr

adw

ell N

orth

Mag

dale

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

est F

legg

Yarm

outh

Nor

thN

orm

anst

onO

ulto

nPa

kefie

ldW

hitto

nO

ulto

n Br

oad

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nSt

And

rew

sKi

rkle

ySt

Mar

gare

t'sC

aist

er S

outh

Car

lton

Blyt

hing

Hal

esw

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Gor

lest

onBu

ngay

Wre

ntha

mW

ainf

ord

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nBe

ccle

s So

uth

The

Sain

tsBe

ccle

s N

orth

Wor

lingh

amFl

eggb

urgh

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

all

ag

es



71Contents

Cancer register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages (Practice databases 2005)

Cancer patients should be registered with their GP. Interestingly the wards with the highest rate of people on the cancer registers do no have the highest premature mortality rates.

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Cai

ster

Nor

thLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thW

rent

ham

St A

ndre

ws

Bung

ayPa

kefie

ldBr

adw

ell N

orth

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmBe

ccle

s N

orth

Gor

lest

onBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Whi

tton

Cla

ydon

Orm

esby

Wai

nfor

dM

agda

len

East

Fle

ggG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

orlin

gham

Wes

t Fle

ggC

arlto

nKi

rkle

yBe

ccle

s So

uth

Kess

ingl

and

Hal

esw

orth

Oul

ton

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nTh

e Sa

ints

Fleg

gbur

ghH

arbo

urBl

ythi

ngC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teC

aist

er S

outh

St M

arga

ret's

Oul

ton

Broa

dYa

rmou

th N

orth

Nel

son

Nor

man

ston

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

all

ag

es



72Contents

Diabetes register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages (Practice databases 2005)

Diabetes is a chronic and progressive disease. It can affect people of all ages in every population. It is becoming a more common condition, the emerging epidemic widely attributed to increasing obesity levels in the population. Socially disadvantaged groups in affluent societies and people from black and minority ethnic communities are particularly vulnerable. Type 2 diabetes is up to six times more common in people of South Asian descent and up to three times more common amongst those of African and African-Caribbean origin than White Europeans. Morbidity from diabetes complications is three-and-a-half times higher amongst the poorest people in our country than the richest. As well as ethnic origin and socio-economic deprivation risk factors associated with Type 2 diabetes include: increasing age, family history of diabetes, increasing levels of obesity and overweight, which in turn are associated with low levels of physical activity and high intake of calories from food and gestational diabetes (diabetes during pregnancy).

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Nel

son

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmC

layd

onEa

st F

legg

Yarm

outh

Nor

thC

aist

er N

orth

Becc

les

Sout

hO

rmes

byH

arbo

urC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teKe

ssin

glan

dLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thW

est F

legg

Brad

wel

l Nor

thKi

rkle

ySt

And

rew

sW

hitto

nBu

ngay

Nor

man

ston

Car

lton

Col

ville

St M

arga

ret's

Mag

dale

nTh

e Sa

ints

Blyt

hing

Gor

lest

onPa

kefie

ldC

arlto

nO

ulto

n Br

oad

Cai

ster

Sou

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Hal

esw

orth

Wor

lingh

amW

rent

ham

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nO

ulto

nBe

ccle

s N

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Wai

nfor

dFl

eggb

urgh

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

all

ag

es



73Contents

COPD or Asthma register directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages (Practice databases 2005)

High rates of respiratory illness as measured by COPD or Asthma could be associated with high smoking prevalence. The highest register rates are found in Nelson and central and Northgate wards both of which have high smoking prevalence and are also amongst the most deprived.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

Nel

son

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Bung

ayEa

st F

legg

Har

bour

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmBe

ccle

s So

uth

Cla

ydon

Nor

man

ston

Cai

ster

Nor

thO

rmes

byW

orlin

gham

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nW

est F

legg

Pake

field

Kess

ingl

and

Whi

tton

Kirk

ley

Car

lton

Col

ville

Cai

ster

Sou

thYa

rmou

th N

orth

Becc

les

Nor

thM

agda

len

St M

arga

ret's

Gor

lest

onO

ulto

nC

arlto

nG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nSt

And

rew

sLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Brad

wel

l Nor

thW

ainf

ord

Wre

ntha

mLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyTh

e Sa

ints

Hal

esw

orth

Fleg

gbur

ghBl

ythi

ngO

ulto

n Br

oad

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

all

ag

es



74Contents

James Paget Hospital A&E attendances directly standardised rate per 100000 all ages (SUS 2005/2006)

Generally wards with higher levels of deprivation and health need account for higher levels of A & E attendances. However, proximity to the James Paget Hospital may also play a role. In Nelson ward the attendance rate is greater than 1 for every 2 people.

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

Nel

son

Mag

dale

nC

layd

onG

orle

ston

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teSt

And

rew

sH

arbo

urBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Yarm

outh

Nor

thSt

Mar

gare

t'sLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

Kirk

ley

Nor

man

ston

East

Fle

ggW

hitto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleC

aist

er N

orth

Cai

ster

Sou

thG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nKe

ssin

glan

dO

ulto

nLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyC

arlto

nW

est F

legg

Oul

ton

Broa

dO

rmes

byPa

kefie

ldW

rent

ham

Becc

les

Sout

hBe

ccle

s N

orth

Fleg

gbur

ghW

orlin

gham

Wai

nfor

dBl

ythi

ngBu

ngay

Hal

esw

orth

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

all

ag

es



75Contents

All cause mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 persons (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

Deaths under the age of 75 are considered premature. The highest premature death rates are found in Nelson and Kirkley wards. These wards have rates which are 3 times higher than in Blything.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Nel

son

Kirk

ley

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Har

bour

Yarm

outh

Nor

thSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

St M

arga

ret's

Wre

ntha

mO

ulto

nG

orle

ston

Cla

ydon

Nor

man

ston

East

Fle

ggH

ales

wor

thW

est F

legg

Car

lton

Whi

tton

Cai

ster

Nor

thSt

And

rew

sBe

ccle

s N

orth

Oul

ton

Broa

dKe

ssin

glan

dM

agda

len

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Pake

field

Wor

lingh

amBr

adw

ell N

orth

Fleg

gbur

ghC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleBu

ngay

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nO

rmes

byC

aist

er S

outh

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nW

ainf

ord

Becc

les

Sout

hTh

e Sa

ints

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Blyt

hing

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

ag

ed

< 7

5



76Contents

Circulatory disease mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 persons (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

Deaths due to heart attacks and strokes are included in circulatory disease deaths. Circulatory or cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is the biggest killer in our society and the burden from this disease is massive. CVD accounted for 39% of all deaths, half of them are caused by Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). The total costs for CHD were estimated at more than 7 billion in 1999. (Petersen S, Peto V and Rayner M (2004): Coronary heart disease statistics. BHF, London). Lifestyle choices such as smoking, poor diet and lack of exercise can contribute to an increased risk of death due to circulatory diseases. The wards with the highest premature death rates due to circulatory disease are Yarmouth North and Claydon with rates more than 3 times the rate in The Saints.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Yarm

outh

Nor

thC

layd

onN

elso

nW

rent

ham

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Oul

ton

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmBe

ccle

s N

orth

Fleg

gbur

ghKi

rkle

ySt

Mar

gare

t'sEa

st F

legg

Gor

lest

onC

aist

er S

outh

St A

ndre

ws

Mag

dale

nH

ales

wor

thW

est F

legg

Nor

man

ston

Brad

wel

l Nor

thKe

ssin

glan

dLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thC

aist

er N

orth

Whi

tton

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Pake

field

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleO

ulto

n Br

oad

Har

bour

Wor

lingh

amBe

ccle

s So

uth

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nW

ainf

ord

Car

lton

Blyt

hing

Bung

ayO

rmes

byTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

ag

ed

< 7

5



77Contents

Cancer mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 persons (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

More than one in three people will be diagnosed with a cancer in their lifetime and one in four will die from cancer. In 2001 around 225,000 new cases of cancer were diagnosed of whom 141,000 were aged less than 75 years. Four types of cancer account for over 50% of new cases: Lung (around 30,000 new cases in 2001); Breast (around 34,000); Bowel (around 27,000) and Prostate (around 26,000). No other individual cancer type accounts for more than 9000 cases per annum.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Kirk

ley

Car

lton

Har

bour

Cla

ydon

St M

arga

ret's

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Nor

man

ston

Yarm

outh

Nor

thG

orle

ston

Wes

t Fle

ggN

elso

nH

ales

wor

thEa

st F

legg

Mag

dale

nSt

And

rew

sW

ainf

ord

Pake

field

Orm

esby

Oul

ton

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmW

orlin

gham

Bung

ayKe

ssin

glan

dW

rent

ham

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nBe

ccle

s N

orth

Whi

tton

Cai

ster

Nor

thLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

Oul

ton

Broa

dBe

ccle

s So

uth

Cai

ster

Sou

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Blyt

hing

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Fleg

gbur

ghTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

pe

rso

ns

ag

ed

< 7

5



78Contents

All cause mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 female (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

Female deaths under the age of 75 are considered premature. Southtown and Cobholm and Oulton wards have the highest female premature death rates. Blything ward has the lowest.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmO

ulto

nSt

Mar

gare

t'sG

orle

ston

Har

bour

Hal

esw

orth

Kirk

ley

Nor

man

ston

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Cai

ster

Nor

thN

elso

nW

rent

ham

Yarm

outh

Nor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

est F

legg

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Oul

ton

Broa

dW

orlin

gham

Mag

dale

nKe

ssin

glan

dEa

st F

legg

Pake

field

Orm

esby

Cai

ster

Sou

thC

layd

onBr

adw

ell N

orth

Whi

tton

St A

ndre

ws

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nBe

ccle

s So

uth

Fleg

gbur

ghBe

ccle

s N

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Bung

aySo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Car

lton

Wai

nfor

dTh

e Sa

ints

Blyt

hing

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

fe

ma

le a

ge

d <

75



79Contents

Circulatory disease mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 female (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

In Southtown and Cobholm and Wrentham wards deaths due to circulatory diseases account for just under and just over a 3rd of the total premature deaths in women respectively. The lowest premature death rates due to circulatory diseases in women are in Carlton and The Saints where no women under the age of 75 died due to circulatory diseases.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmW

rent

ham

Yarm

outh

Nor

thN

orm

anst

onBe

ccle

s N

orth

Nel

son

St M

arga

ret's

Cai

ster

Sou

thC

layd

onM

agda

len

East

Fle

ggW

est F

legg

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Kess

ingl

and

Oul

ton

Fleg

gbur

ghC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teC

aist

er N

orth

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Whi

tton

Gor

lest

onBr

adw

ell N

orth

Becc

les

Sout

hO

ulto

n Br

oad

St A

ndre

ws

Kirk

ley

Hal

esw

orth

Pake

field

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nH

arbo

urSo

uthw

old

and

Rey

don

Wor

lingh

amC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

ainf

ord

Blyt

hing

Bung

ayO

rmes

byG

unto

n an

d C

orto

nC

arlto

nTh

e Sa

ints

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

fe

ma

le a

ge

d <

75



80Contents

Cancer mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 female (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

Most of the wards in Great Yarmouth and Waveney have a premature death rate due to cancer that is lower than the England average. In Carlton ward and The Saints nearly all premature deaths in women were due to cancer. Kirkley and Halesworth wards have the highest premature death rates due to cancer. Blything ward has the lowest.

0

50

100

150

200

250

Kirk

ley

Hal

esw

orth

Gor

lest

onN

orm

anst

onPa

kefie

ldO

rmes

byC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleW

orlin

gham

Mag

dale

nW

est F

legg

Har

bour

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nW

ainf

ord

St M

arga

ret's

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

East

Fle

ggC

arlto

nSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Whi

tton

Cla

ydon

Cai

ster

Sou

thO

ulto

nBe

ccle

s So

uth

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

St A

ndre

ws

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teC

aist

er N

orth

Bung

ayFl

eggb

urgh

Oul

ton

Broa

dKe

ssin

glan

dTh

e Sa

ints

Nel

son

Brad

wel

l Nor

thYa

rmou

th N

orth

Wre

ntha

mBe

ccle

s N

orth

Blyt

hing

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

fe

ma

le a

ge

d <

75



81Contents

All cause mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 male (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

Male deaths under the age of 75 are considered premature. Nelson and Kirkley wards have the highest premature death rates for men. These are 3 to 4 times higher than the wards with the lowest premature death rates: Gunton and Corton and Beccles South.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Nel

son

Kirk

ley

Cen

tral a

nd N

orth

gate

Yarm

outh

Nor

thH

arbo

urW

rent

ham

Cla

ydon

Sout

htow

n an

d C

obho

lmSt

Mar

gare

t'sC

arlto

nG

orle

ston

Oul

ton

Becc

les

Nor

thSt

And

rew

sEa

st F

legg

Whi

tton

Nor

man

ston

Wes

t Fle

ggO

ulto

n Br

oad

Kess

ingl

and

Mag

dale

nLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thC

aist

er N

orth

Pake

field

Fleg

gbur

ghH

ales

wor

thBr

adw

ell N

orth

Bung

ayW

orlin

gham

Wai

nfor

dBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Blyt

hing

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nTh

e Sa

ints

Car

lton

Col

ville

Orm

esby

Cai

ster

Sou

thLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyBe

ccle

s So

uth

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

ma

le a

ge

d <

75



82Contents

Circulatory disease mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 male (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

In Claydon and Yarmouth North wards deaths due to circulatory diseases account for over a 3rd of the total premature deaths in men. The lowest premature death rates due to circulatory diseases in men are in Ormesby and Beccles South.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Cla

ydon

Yarm

outh

Nor

thC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teN

elso

nKi

rkle

yO

ulto

nW

rent

ham

Fleg

gbur

ghSt

And

rew

sG

orle

ston

Becc

les

Nor

thH

ales

wor

thSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

East

Fle

ggSt

Mar

gare

t'sC

aist

er S

outh

Brad

wel

l Nor

thC

arlto

n C

olvi

lleM

agda

len

Wes

t Fle

ggLo

thin

glan

d Ya

rmou

thBr

adw

ell S

outh

and

Hop

ton

Pake

field

Cai

ster

Nor

thW

hitto

nKe

ssin

glan

dH

arbo

urO

ulto

n Br

oad

Car

lton

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Nor

man

ston

Loth

ingl

and

Wav

eney

Wor

lingh

amW

ainf

ord

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nTh

e Sa

ints

Blyt

hing

Bung

ayBe

ccle

s So

uth

Orm

esby

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

ma

le a

ge

d <

75



83Contents

Cancer mortality directly standardised rate per 100000 aged < 75 male (NCHOD / ERPHO 2003-2005)

In Carlton ward more than half of the premature deaths in men were due to cancer. Compare this to Gunton and Corton where less than one third of premature deaths are due to cancer.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Car

lton

Yarm

outh

Nor

thN

elso

nC

entra

l and

Nor

thga

teH

arbo

urKi

rkle

yC

layd

onSt

Mar

gare

t'sSt

And

rew

sW

rent

ham

East

Fle

ggBe

ccle

s N

orth

Oul

ton

Kess

ingl

and

Bung

ayW

ainf

ord

Wes

t Fle

ggBl

ythi

ngSo

utht

own

and

Cob

holm

Mag

dale

nN

orm

anst

onBr

adw

ell N

orth

Cai

ster

Nor

thG

orle

ston

Hal

esw

orth

Orm

esby

Sout

hwol

d an

d R

eydo

nPa

kefie

ldW

hitto

nO

ulto

n Br

oad

Loth

ingl

and

Yarm

outh

Wor

lingh

amLo

thin

glan

d W

aven

eyBe

ccle

s So

uth

Brad

wel

l Sou

th a

nd H

opto

nC

aist

er S

outh

Fleg

gbur

ghTh

e Sa

ints

Car

lton

Col

ville

Gun

ton

and

Cor

ton

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

Wav

eney

Gre

at Y

arm

outh

and

Wav

eney

PC

TN

orfo

lkSu

ffolk

Coa

stal

& C

ount

rysi

deEa

st o

f Eng

land

Engl

and


DS

R p

er

10

00

00

ma

le a

ge

d <

75



84Contents

Travel times from postcodes to Northgate Hospital (ERPHO 2007)

The times shown are the shortest time it takes to get from the postcode to Northgate hospital. All times based on "normal" travel times in kilometres per hour (kph). Motorway in a rural area 101.4kph, in an urban area 56.3kph. A road in a rural area 72.4kph and in an urban area 40.2kph. B road in a rural area 38.6kph, in an urban area 19.3kph. Minor road in a rural area 22.5kph, in an urban area 17.7kph.

85Contents

Travel times from postcodes to Lowestoft Hospital (ERPHO 2007)

The times shown are the shortest time it takes to get from the postcode to Lowestoft hospital. All times based on "normal" travel times in kilometres per hour (kph). Motorway in a rural area 101.4kph, in an urban area 56.3kph. A road in a rural area 72.4kph and in an urban area 40.2kph. B road in a rural area 38.6kph, in an urban area 19.3kph. Minor road in a rural area 22.5kph, in an urban area 17.7kph.

86Contents

Travel times from postcodes to Beccles Hospital (ERPHO 2007)

The times shown are the shortest time it takes to get from the postcode to Beccles hospital. All times based on "normal" travel times in kilometres per hour (kph). Motorway in a rural area 101.4kph, in an urban area 56.3kph. A road in a rural area 72.4kph and in an urban area 40.2kph. B road in a rural area 38.6kph, in an urban area 19.3kph. Minor road in a rural area 22.5kph, in an urban area 17.7kph.

87Contents

Travel times from postcodes to All Hallows Hospital (ERPHO 2007)

The times shown are the shortest time it takes to get from the postcode to All Hallows hospital. All times based on "normal" travel times in kilometres per hour (kph). Motorway in a rural area 101.4kph, in an urban area 56.3kph. A road in a rural area 72.4kph and in an urban area 40.2kph. B road in a rural area 38.6kph, in an urban area 19.3kph. Minor road in a rural area 22.5kph, in an urban area 17.7kph.

88Contents

Travel times from postcodes to Patrick Stead Hospital (ERPHO 2007)

The times shown are the shortest time it takes to get from the postcode to Patrick Stead hospital. All times based on "normal" travel times in kilometres per hour (kph). Motorway in a rural area 101.4kph, in an urban area 56.3kph. A road in a rural area 72.4kph and in an urban area 40.2kph. B road in a rural area 38.6kph, in an urban area 19.3kph. Minor road in a rural area 22.5kph, in an urban area 17.7kph.

89Contents

Travel times from postcodes to Southwold Hospital (ERPHO 2007)

The times shown are the shortest time it takes to get from the postcode to Southwold hospital. All times based on "normal" travel times in kilometres per hour (kph). Motorway in a rural area 101.4kph, in an urban area 56.3kph. A road in a rural area 72.4kph and in an urban area 40.2kph. B road in a rural area 38.6kph, in an urban area 19.3kph. Minor road in a rural area 22.5kph, in an urban area 17.7kph.

90Contents

The last slide

health atlas 2008. contents 2 5 acknowledgements 6 the use of colours in the bar charts and maps 7...

Documents

lsoa sub domain

lsoa income domain

lsoa employment domain

lsoa subdomain

lsoa crime domain

environment domain

services domain

disability domain