hanover economic development 2015 annual report
TRANSCRIPT
Ec
on
om
ic D
ev
elo
pm
en
t A
nn
ua
l R
ep
ort
FY
20
15
Innovate. Prosper. Grow.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 2
Objectiv
eKe
y Indicator
Data So
urce/D
ata
Owne
rCu
rren
t Mea
suremen
tHan
over Targe
tGreen
Yello
wRe
d
1.0
Encourage private land
owne
rs
to re
ady commercial sites for
sale and
lease
Acres a
t stage 3 of readine
ss
for com
mercial investmen
tEcon
omic Develop
men
t De
partmen
t38
1.1 Acres
Maintain 45
0 acres o
f stage 3 ready commercial
prop
erty inventory
450 acres o
r more
of stage 3 ready
commercial
prop
erty inventory
Betw
een 40
0 and
450 acres o
f stage 3
ready commercial
prop
erty inventory
400 acres o
r less o
f tie
r 3 re
ady
commercial
prop
erty inventory
2.0
Real prope
rty tax base
deriv
ed from
com
mercial
sources
Assessor's Office
2014
new
com
mercial
assessed
value
$4
9,14
2,35
7 ( add
ed in
annu
al year)‐ total
assessmen
ts of
$8,921
,185
,600
of
resid
entia
l prope
rty and
$2,520
,214
,900
of
commercial prope
rty
$50M
of n
ew com
mercial
investmen
ts based
on
assessed
value
Commercial
prop
erty
investmen
ts in
excess of $
50M
based on
assessed
value
Commercial
prop
erty
investmen
ts of
$40M
‐ $5
0M
dollars based
on
assessed
value
Commercial
prop
erty
investmen
ts of
$39.99
9M dollars
or less based
on
assessed
value
2.1
Ratio
of com
mercial to
resid
entia
l prope
rty
assessmen
tsAssessor's Office
71% re
siden
tial
20% com
mercial
2015
data
(apartmen
ts are includ
ed
in re
siden
tial totals)
Increm
ental goal of
attaining a minim
um
prop
erty base ratio
of
25% com
mercial to
75%
resid
entia
l by 20
17 w
ith a
long
term
goal of 3
0%
25% of the
total
coun
ty prope
rty
assessmen
ts are
deriv
ed from
commercial
prop
erty and
75%
is
resid
entia
l
Betw
een 20
% and
25
% of the
total
coun
ty prope
rty
assessmen
ts are
deriv
ed from
commercial
prop
erty and
be
tween 75
% and
77
.5 % is re
siden
tial
20% or less o
f the
total cou
nty
prop
erty
assessmen
ts are
deriv
ed from
commercial
prop
erty
3.0
Expand
stakeh
olde
r involvem
ent w
ith re
gards to
econ
omic develop
men
t throu
gh
engagemen
t
Implem
ent a
business
survey to
engage curren
t bu
sinesses in future
econ
omic develop
men
t
Econ
omic Develop
men
t De
partmen
tCu
rren
tly Im
plem
entin
gTo
be completed
by June
30
, 201
5Survey com
pleted
n/a
Survey not
completed
4.0
Num
ber o
f job
s sup
ported
by
Hanover Cou
nty
workforce
Virginia Employmen
t Co
mmission
48,149
Jobs
3% growth
3% or m
ore
Betw
een 1%
and
3%
1% or less
4.1
Ratio
of job
s to labo
r force
Virginia Employmen
t Co
mmission
0.8:1
(201
4 data)
0.9:1
(long
term
1:1)
0.9:1 or m
ore
Betw
een 0.8:1 and
0.9:1
Less th
an 0.8:1
4.2
Une
mploymen
t rate
Virginia Employmen
t Co
mmission
4.20
%4%
or less
4% or less
Betw
een 4%
and
5%
5% or m
ore
Goa
l: Create strategic bu
sine
ss in
vestmen
t tha
t enh
ances the
qua
lity of life in
the coun
tyEcon
omic Dev
elop
men
t Metric
s
Expand
the nu
mbe
r of job
s to
available workforce
Increase cou
nty tax base
deriv
ed from
com
mercial
sources
Page 1 of 2
10/13/20
15
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 1
Executive Summary
For Fiscal Year 2015, unemployment
decreased slightly and job growth was
mixed. Capital investment increased and
leasing and sales activity grew. Vacancy
rates decreased for industrial, flex and
retail.
Business attraction efforts with the Greater
Richmond Partnership were successful
with the addition of Mavalério, a Brazil-
based manufacturer of confections for
the baking industry. The company will
invest $5 million to add a new production
facility and U.S. headquarters in Hanover
County. The company plans to move
into a 38,000-square-foot space at the
Northlake Business Park. The investment
is expected to create 55 new jobs.
Hanover’s competitiveness for new
business prospects is severely curtailed
by a lack of available pad-ready sites and
buildings. This lack of commercial product
limits our ability to attract new investment.
Any effective economic development
strategy must include the aggressive
development of available pad-ready sites
and buildings.
Economic development in Hanover County
can be successful by recruiting higher-
wage industries, increasing densities in
the suburban service area, and proactively
converting raw land into pad-ready
commercial product.
The Hanover County Board of Supervisors
reduced the fees associated with
commercial zoning applications and site
plan review applications and to eliminate
the cost per acre calculation. There is now
a flat cost of $1,100 to rezone property for
business, office and service and industrial
use. The cost for reviewing site plans is
also now a flat cost of $1,100.
In June, the tourism microsite
VisitHanoverVA.com was launched. The
site is branded specifically to promote
tourism in Hanover County while benefiting
from the 75,000 per month visitors to its
parent site, VisitRichmondVA.com.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow.
Goal: Create strategic business investment that enhances the quality of life in Hanover.
ObjectivesEncourage private land owners to ready commercial sites for sale and lease ..................................Page 3
Increase county tax base derived from commercial sources .............Page 9
Expand economic development stakeholder involvement through engagement ............................Page 11
Expand the number of jobs to available workforce ..............Page 14
Increase the number of jobs that have above average wages ............Page 18
1
2
3
4
5
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 3
Objective 1: Encourage private land owners to ready commercial sites for sale and lease
Hanover competes regionally for new business investment, both from those recruited
here from out-of-town as well as from the expansion of existing businesses. In either
case, that investment must be housed somewhere so the stock and quality of available
commercial property is critical for new business investment.
Over the past number of years, Hanover’s competitiveness has been challenged by
a lack of available sites and buildings. Among the four Greater Richmond Partnership
localities, Hanover has only nine percent of the available commercial space. This
disadvantage curtails Hanover’s ability to be competitive for new investment dollars from
not only new businesses, but our existing corporate community as well. While attracting
new businesses is a viable economic development strategy, retaining and expanding
existing businesses will always be a priority. Without commercial location options that
accommodate their growth, Hanover could and does lose expanding existing local
businesses.
In 2015, Hanover County saw leasing absorption in high-bay industrial and larger blocks
of commercial / industrial space. This means that Hanover’s industrial tax base grew
and local businesses found location solutions. However, our industrial vacancy rate for
high-bay space is at an all-time low so our ability to accommodate business investment
is limited. The nation and region have not seen much activity in speculative industrial
development since the recession in 2008. It is critical that Hanover position itself as a
viable option for speculative development to stay competitive and provide locations for
both existing and new businesses.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 4
2,077,192
1,725,714
11,766,765
5,708,842
21,278,513
2,113,472
1,754,722
12,022,114
5,878,227
21,768,535
0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000
Office
Flex
Industrial
Retail
Total
Change in Rentable Commercial Building Area (sf)
2015 2014
Source: CoStar, Data as of September 1, 2015
14.2%
3.9%
14.1%
3.8%0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%
10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%
2010 4Q 2011 4Q 2012 4Q 2013 4Q 2014 4Q 2015 2Q
Hanover Vacancy Rates by Property Class
Retail Office Flex Industrial
Source: CoStar, Data as of September 1, 2015
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 5
21,768,5359%
79,713,55835%75,110,730
33%
53,529,19223%
Total Rentable Building Area in GRP by Locality
Hanover Henrico Richmond Chesterfield
Source: CoStar, Data as of September 1, 2015
56,975,55125%
10,626,6975%
95,486,91541%
67,032,85229%
Total Rentable Building Area in GRP by Class
Office Flex Industrial Retail
Source: CoStar, Data as of September 1, 2015
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 6
Commercial Property – Rentable Building Area by Locality and Class
Hanover Henrico Richmond Chesterfield Total
Office 2,113,472 21,488,901 24,391,191 8,981,987 56,975,551
Flex 1,754,722 4,866,599 1,683,180 2,322,196 10,626,697
Industrial 12,022,114 27,805,656 32,728,740 22,930,405 95,486,915
Retail 5,878,227 25,552,402 16,307,619 19,294,604 67,032,852
Total 21,768,535 79,713,558 75,110,730 53,529,192 230,122,015
Source: CoStar, Data as of September 1, 2015
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 7
Candidate Tier Three SitesThe Board adopted an initiative in 2014 to develop strategies for increasing inventory
of Tier Three pad-ready commercial product sites by at least 100 acres. Two new
important zoning cases passed that recently added more than 200 acres of M2 product.
The Land Use program expansion initiative can be credited in bringing these two cases,
the Baldwin/Gilman Site and the Holland Cedar Lane, through the rezoning process.
Adopted in 2013, the new land use policy allows for land owners in the Suburban
Services Area to rezone out of land use and into certain commercial land use without
paying higher taxes normally associated with upzoning a site. The sites must meet
certain criteria as outlined in the Land Use Policy and the Economic Development
Strategic Plan.
In 2015, all fees associated with qualifying commercial rezonings and site plan were
amended to be more owner and business-friendly. These initiatives will be very
important in Hanover’s efforts to increase its inventory of development-ready sites and
buildings.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 8
Site Name Acr
es A
vai
lab
le
Zo
nin
g
Ex
isti
ng
Acc
ess?
Lis
ted
fo
r S
ale/
Lea
se?
Ma
ster
Pla
n?
Mar
ket
ing
Mat
eria
ls?
Su
rvey
?
En
vir
on
men
tal?
Wat
er A
t S
ite?
Sew
er A
t S
ite?
Notes
Atlee Station 32 M1 Two sites of 24 and 8 acres.
Northlake 42 M2 Largest parcel is 13 ac. Potential second 13 ac parcel with I-95 frontage. Other parcels are 2-3 ac. DGIF of 10 acres now available.
Bell Creek 60 M1 Property lends itself to medical uses. Ashland Business Park 14.5 B2 Two parcels of 5.96 and 8.52 ac.
Cedar Run 25 M1 Airport / height restrictions. Access to be addressed. Parcel is pie-shaped.
Atlee Commerce Center 28.6 OS Site consists of four, 1+ ac parcels is Flex b.Quarles Road 14 M1 Rectangular site. Some wetlands
Crescent Business Center 4 M1 Site isn’t available for sale but developer can provide build to suit options.
VA Trans Park 16 M1 One parcel remaining. No marketing materials developed.
Enterchange D Pad 16 M2 Approved site plan for 315,000 sf; owner will sell site and/or build to suit.
Atlee Commons 11 M2 Two sites of 7 and 4 ac.
Holland Cedar Lane 118 M2 Route 1 frontage and infrastructure.
Subtotal 381.1
Candidate Tier Three
SuperValu 65 M2 Back parcels accessed by Erle Road. Upgraded rail crossing needed. Some wetlands in front but subdivide options are available.
Baldwin/Gilman 97 M2 Prime location on I-95 adjacent to north boundary of Northlake.
Air Park Associates 217 M2 Some wetlands, can build out more than 1M SF, some utility extensions required.
Subtotal 379
TOTAL ACREAGE: 760.1
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 9
Objective 2: Increase tax base derived from commercial sources
Significant capital investments in land development, machinery and tools, and
buildings not only bolster the tax base, but also create permanence to retaining
business operations within Hanover County. The frequency and volume of these
capital investments often reflect the psychological outlook of business owners, who are
understandably reluctant to invest should their economic prospects appear dim. FY
2015 saw increased capital investment by business owners, largely maintaining the ratio
of residential investment in recent years.
$2,349,433,400 $2,359,718,500 $2,365,408,300
$2,396,613,600
$2,442,066,000
$2,520,214,900
$2,250,000,000
$2,300,000,000
$2,350,000,000
$2,400,000,000
$2,450,000,000
$2,500,000,000
$2,550,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Commercial Construction Assessed Values
Source: Hanover County Building Assessor's Office. Data based on calendar year.
73% 72% 71% 71% 71% 71%
18% 19%20% 20% 20% 20%
9% 9%9% 9% 9% 9%
$‐
$2,000,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$8,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000
$12,000,000,000
$14,000,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Assessed
Lan
d Va
lue
Assessed Land Value
Other (agricultural) Commercial Residential
Source: Hanover County Building Assessor's Office. Data based on calendar year.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 10
$22,889,542
$32,335,596
$42,029,156 $38,069,149
$49,142,357
$0
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
New Construction Commercial Permit Value
Source: Hanover County Building Inspector's Office. Data based on calendar year.
‐2.0
‐7.9
1.8 0.8
15.6
‐10.0
‐5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
$210,000,000
$220,000,000
$230,000,000
$240,000,000
$250,000,000
$260,000,000
$270,000,000
$280,000,000
$290,000,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Percent C
hange vs Year A
go
Tax Assessment
Business Personal Property Tax Assessment
Percent Change vs. Prior Year Assessment
Source: Hanover County Commissioner of Revenue ‐ Personal Property Statistics. Data based on calendar year.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 11
Objective 3: Expand stakeholder involvement with regards to economic development through engagement
Existing Business Assistance
Retaining and — where timely — expanding existing businesses is key to Hanover’s
economic development. Also vital is nurturing an entrepreneurial environment where
existing businesses have growth opportunities and startups can thrive. Much of the FY
2015 program year focused on raising existing business awareness of the programs
and services available through this department.
Hanover manages outreach efforts to local businesses
principally through the BusinessFirst program. This outreach
aims to provide resources and technical support to existing
businesses through the use of trained business volunteers.
This year, 103 businesses interviews were performed, 25
of which by trained business volunteers. This was a 19%
increase in the total number of interviews from the previous
year. In addition to the 103 business officials interviewed
186 total businesses were assisted. Much of this additional
reach of assistance provided was gained through the
implementation of “Business Walks.” Through these business
walks alone, an additional 72 businesses were contacted
and provided assistance, this is above and beyond the 103
businesses that were interviewed. The Business First program focus has be altered
to place a high emphasis on volunteer participation in business walks where there is
a condensed participation window for volunteers with maximum business community
impact.
103 Interviews
186 Businesses Assisted
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 12
The overall feedback from interviews was positive with most businesses beginning
to see sales increase and approach pre-recession levels. Most immediate concerns
are focused on federal taxation and other government regulations (federal, state and
local). Of the 103 companies interviewed, 33 of them indicated currently undergoing or
planning for some form of expansion within the year. Plans for expansion include new
investment of equipment, software, and/or building expansion along with the addition of
new jobs
Lead Generation
Business attraction is another vital component to a healthy economy. Lead generation is
paramount in achieving economic development success with new business recruitment.
The volume and quality of leads translate directly into landed investments. For this
report, a qualified lead is any company receiving personal or a direct contact from
Hanover staff. The contact could be in the form of a real estate recommendation,
information on business operating costs, or a response to a proposal.
35%
27%
38%
Lead Source By Organization
Hanover County Economic Development & Other
Greater Richmond Partnership (GRP)
Virginia Economic Development Partnership (VEDP)
Source: Hanover County Economic Development
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 13
Tourism in Hanover
Tourism has a huge impact on a wide range of businesses within our community.
Millions of tourists visit each year, and a very small percentage drop by the visitor
centers in Ashland and Bass Pro Shops. Recorded visits fell by approximately 3,000 in
November 2014 most likely due to overcast and rainy weather on Train Day in Ashland.
23,385 22,390 24,580
27,37125,252
‐
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Annual Visits to Visitor Centers
Source: Hanover County Economic Development. Data is based on fiscal year.
$679,000 $709,000$786,000 $810,000
$900,000
$0$100,000$200,000$300,000$400,000$500,000$600,000$700,000$800,000$900,000
$1,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Lodging Tax Revenue
Source: Richmond Region Tourism. Data is based on fiscal year.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 14
Objective 4: Expand the number of jobs to available workforce
Hanover can be very competitive for professional services, creative and knowledge-
based services and finance operations because Hanover does not assess a Business
Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) tax. This is unique among the GRP four
communities, with whom Hanover competes for Target Cluster investments within the
region. However, Hanover lacks the “Class A” real estate product that these businesses
traditionally prefer, so those investments often go elsewhere — along with their higher-
wage jobs. While Hanover’s economic base is growing steadily, Hanover is still falling
behind the region on wage growth — mainly due to the lack of real estate needed to
attract knowledge-based jobs from these Target Clusters.
Consider the current business and technology trend that enhanced power capabilities
and redundant fiber are a critical need of many of the sectors with higher-wage jobs.
Data centers, advanced manufacturing and food processing (in addition to Supply
Chain Management) represent the majority of the types of companies that are looking
to expand or locate in the GRP region. High-speed Internet is needed to recruit and
develop knowledge-based/higher-wage jobs. Without the right public infrastructure in
place, these projects often bypass Hanover for better infrastructure situations.
Workforce automation is a growing trend that can threaten communities that have larger
growth among low-skilled and low-wage jobs. Currently Hanover has an increased
concentration of lower-wage jobs as compared to our regional partners which puts
Hanover more at risk from automation. Lower-wage jobs typically equate lower-
skilled jobs, and these jobs are more prone to elimination by workplace automation
deployments. We need to be in the business of creating high-wage/high-skilled jobs that
move our community forward.
1.7% Drop in
Unemployment
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 15
Hanover has an educated and skilled workforce; however, many out-commute to jobs in
neighboring localities. Our goal is to grow high-wage jobs here creating an in-commute
of skilled workers.
Our efforts specifically target key industries poised for growth including: Professional
Services, Advanced Manufacturing, Healthcare, Supply Chain and Logistics, and
Destination Retail. Within these growth industries, we specifically work to recruit those
with higher wage jobs.
6.5
5.85.5 5.4
4.9
4.2
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 (Jun)
Percent U
nemploymen
t
Num
ber o
f Une
mployed
Annual Unemployment in Hanover [Not Seasonally Adjusted]
Unemployment Unemployment Rate (%)
Data based on calendar year.Source: LAUS Unit and Bureau of Labor Statistics
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 16
‐511
389
768
1,366
1,296
3,308
‐1,000 ‐500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Total Net 5 Year
Net New Jobs in All Industries
Source: VEC Labor Market Statistics, Covered Employment and Wages Program. Data based on calendar year.
Ratio of Jobs-to-Labor Force
Hanover’s workforce to labor ratio, ideally at a 1:1 ratio, is
showing an upward trend.
77%
78%
79%
80%
81%
82%
83%
84%
85%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Jobs to Labor Ratio
Source: VEC. Data based on calendar year.
1 : 0.8jobs to workforce
1,296 New Jobs
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 17
Growth and Decline Industries
Within Hanover County’s targeted industries, Professional/Technical experienced
the largest increase, adding 591 new jobs over the previous year. Management of
Companies has bounced back in employment.
Three target industries — Information, Logistics, Real Estate and Manufacturing —
experienced the most losses among our target industries.
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
Finance/Insurance
Healthcare
Management of Companies
Manufacturing
Information
Professional/Technical
Real Estate
Logistics
Number of Jobs by Target Industry
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010
Source: VEC. Data based on calendar year.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 18
Objective 5: Increase the number of jobs that have above average wages
Hanover seeks job growth; however, the long-term goal is to increase higher-wage job
growth. This is done by the recruitment of targeted industries offering higher wages.
The attainment of higher-wage jobs will increase the overall average wage. When
these gains are realized, Hanover will provide more in-county job opportunities for its
educated and skilled workforce, enjoy a more diverse and stable job base, and offer a
wide-range of employment opportunities for all qualified job-seekers.
28.3%
44.3%
18.1%
4.6% 3.1% 1.6%
21.2%
42.5%
18.7%
8.3%5.1% 4.3%
16.5%
49.2%
21.7%
6.2%3.9% 2.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Less than$25,000
$25,000 ‐$50,000
$50,000 ‐$75,000
$75,000 ‐$100,000
$100,000 ‐$125,000
Greater than$125,000
Distribution of Wages
Hanover Virginia United States
Source: JobsEQ. Data based on calendar year.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 19
709
5,829
958
3,594
582
2,164
435
1,342
‐
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
$‐
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
Avg An
nual # Jo
bs in
Hanover ‐2014
Average Weekly Wage ‐2
014
Average Weekly Wage in Target Industries
Hanover Henrico
Richmond Chesterfield
Virginia Avg Annual # of Jobs in Hanover
Source: VEC/QCEW. Data based on calendar year.
Job creation is paramount to a bright future as a community. Hanover’s wages are 15%
to 43% less than the other localities within the Greater Richmond Partnership (GRP),
and Hanover’s average wage growth has noticeably lagged compared to the region,
state, and the country. As businesses are recruited, knowledge-based jobs should be
the top priority, as they have higher wages.
Annual ReportFY 2015
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow. 20
$36,972$37,311
$37,890 $37,865
$39,185
$35,500
$36,000
$36,500
$37,000
$37,500
$38,000
$38,500
$39,000
$39,500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Average Annual Wages for Hanover
Source: JobsEQ. Data based on calendar year. Data points reflect last quarter of each calendar year.
$40,337
$44,432
$51,310$50,111
$53,709
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
$50,000
$55,000
$60,000
Average Annual Wage — Regional Comparison
Richmond Virginia Hanover Chesterfield Henrico
Source: JobsEQ. Data based on calendar year.
HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Wayne T. Hazzard, Chairman, South Anna District Aubrey M. Stanley, Vice-Chairman, Beaverdam District
G. Ed Via, III, Ashland District | Angela Kelly-Wiecek, Chickahominy District Elton J. Wade, Sr., Cold Harbor District | Sean Davis, Henry District
W. Canova Peterson IV, Mechanicsville District
Hanover County Economic Development Innovate. Prosper. Grow.
8200 Center Path Lane Suite E Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | 804.365.6464 | HanoverVirginia.com