h. lundbeck a/s schizophrenia treatment landscape study final country report – canada q1 2013...
TRANSCRIPT
H. LUNDBECK A/S
Schizophrenia Treatment Landscape Study
Final country report – Canada
Q1 2013(Fieldwork August – October 2012)
Prepared by:InforMed InsightTel: +44 1625 [email protected]
2
Overview of Schizophrenia Treatment Landscape Study
Methodology: retrospective real-world study where physicians retrieved existing patient medical records for 6 patients meeting the screening criteria and entered information into an online survey
Target physicians: Psychiatrists (and Nervenärzte in Germany)
Scope: 13 markets (5EU, Poland, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Nordics)
Sample: 964 physicians and 5469 patient records
Included an over-sample on patients receiving LAI medication
Business objective: To gain a real-world snapshot into the management of patients with schizophrenia through the collection and
analysis of customised patient report formsSpecific focus on patient receiving LAI medication
Country Physicians (n) PRFs (n) Representative sample PRFs (n)
LAI oversample PRFs (n)
Canada 62 346 231 115
3
Sample size: patients receiving oral vs. LAI
*The oversample was specifically on patients receiving LAI medication, however some patients were receiving concomitant oral therapy, as shown above
The ratio of oral:LAI anti-psychotic prescriptions in the representative sample is 7:1 for all countries and
8:1 for Canada
Country Representative sampleOral (n) – Atypicals
Oral (n) - Typicals
LAI (n) – Atypicals
LAI (n) - Typicals
Canada 200 (90%) 16 (7%) 15 (7%) 11 (5%)
Country LAI oversample*
Oral (n) – Atypicals
Oral (n) - Typicals
LAI (n) – Atypicals
LAI (n) - Typicals
Canada25 (22%) 1 (1%) 76 (66%) 39 (34%)
Note that patients can receive more than one drug, hence percentages add up to more than 100%
Representative sample:This excludes the additional LAI
patients (oversample) and will give a reflective view of the market
LAI oversample:We collected additional patient
record forms for patient receiving LAI medications to boost the
sample size for patients receiving LAIs and permit sub-group
analysis
4
Physician and patient screening criteria
• Patients selected at random from existing records based on first initial of last name
• Adult patient (at least 18 years old) currently diagnosed with schizophrenia
• Seen by physician within the last 24 months (from date of interview)
• Over-sample on patients receiving LAI anti-psychotics:
•Physicians who initiate LAIs profiled 4 patients of any type & 2 specifically receiving a LAI medication
•Physicians who do not initiate LAIs profiled 6 patients of any type
• Psychiatrists
• Actively managing and treating patients with schizophrenia
• Treating 10 or more schizophrenia patients per month
• Majority of physicians LAI initiators
• Qualified for 3-30 years
• Representative mix of practice settings and regions within each market
Schizophrenia patientsPhysicians
5
Prescription count data from this Treatment Landscape study has a reasonable correlation with IMS treatment days data
Base: current prescriptions (representative patients) (n=4645)
IMS data summary• Time period: YTD 2012• Data level: volume shares (treatment days), %
R² (R-squared) is a measure of how well the data from the survey fits with IMS prescribing data, where 0 = no fit
and 1 = a perfect fit
olanzapine risperidone clozapine quetiapine aripiprazole paliperidone amisulpride ziprasidone asenapine paliperidone palmitate haloperidol levomepromazine chlorpormazine zuclopenthixol fluphenazine flupentixol
6
Structure of questionnaire
Part A: Physician profiling • Screening questions & physician profiling
• Caseload• Setting
• Perception based questions• Physicians overall prescribing of antipsychotics• Unmet needs• Adherence• Insight (anosognosia)
B: Patient record form (Completed PRFs)• Patient demographics• Disease profiling• Hospitalisations• Treatment profiling• Adherence• Insight• Quality of life• If on LAI: LAI specific questions
These sections are sign-posted within the presentation with these labels:
Physician profiling / perception PRF
7
Key thoughts
SETTING Physicians in Canada predominantly work in hospital acute care and out-patient clinics, working
mainly with out-patients or a mix of in-patients and out-patients Almost two thirds of patients are perceived to be stable with residual symptoms, 16% of patients
are current acute
MARKET SHARE Risperidone (24%) and olanzapine (21%) are the most commonly prescribed oral anti-
psychotics, Risperdal Consta is the most commonly prescribed LAI treatment along with typical LAIs (4% and 5% respectively)
Prescribing of typicals was higher previously
SWITCHING 50% of treatment switches / discontinuations are due to poor efficacy / symptom control, and
45% due to poor tolerability (significantly higher for orals than LAIs) Main reason for prescribing LAI treatment is poor adherence with oral therapy, with 22% of
patients also being prescribed it as a more convenient dosing form
INSIGHT 48% of patients are fully aware of their condition, 38% moderately aware and 14% fully unaware.
Patients receiving LAI treatment are significantly less likely to be fully aware than those on orals Actual awareness levels are higher than physician’s initial estimates
8
Interactive Dashboard of all data will be provided
This report has selected key points of interest for presentation purposes, but please note that more results can be accessed via the Interactive Dashboard:
This will be provided in Excel format early in 2013
If you have any questions regarding the use of the dashboard, please contact Gitte Esmann (GIES) or the InforMed team ([email protected])
9
Report contents
• Physician profiling• Based on physician’s perception: insight and adherence
Physician insights
• Patient and disease profiling• Patient journey• Patient analysis by level of adherence and insight
Patient insights (based on PRFs)
• Overall prescribing, reasons for prescribing and switching• Exploration around LAI anti-psychotics
Treatment landscape
10
Section summary
All physicians initiate (prescribe) LAI anti-psychotics Physicians predominantly work in hospital acute care and out-patient clinics, working
mainly with out-patients or a mix of in-patients and out-patients Presence of side effects and no insight into the disease are perceived to be the main
reason for non/partial adherence, over 50% of doctors also note drug/alcohol as a significant reason
Switching to LAI injection is the most common and successful step to improve partial/non-adherence
69% of physicians are familiar with the term anosognosia, the majority believe it means a lack of awareness/insight into the condition
In patients that are only moderately aware of their schizophrenia, most physicians feel there is room for improvement in their insight
When asked directly, a patient’s level of insight is said to impact on prescribing decisions, most physicians are more likely to prescribe an LAI to a patient with a low level of insight rather than one with high insight
Low level of insight is felt to be the main reason for low patient adherence to treatment; to address this most physicians say that they switch to LAI treatment
11
Psychiatrists have an average of 17 years experience. Schizophrenia patients represent 32% of their (monthly) caseload. 100% of physicians initiate LAI treatment
S2: How many years have you been practicing in your clinical specialty, after qualifying? S3: Thinking about an average month, approximately how many patients do you see in total? Of these, how many patients with schizophrenia do you personally treat or manage in a month? S5: Do you initiate LAI treatment for patients with schizophrenia?
Physician profiling
Monthly caseload (S3) n=62)
SZ patients represent 32% of a physician’s total caseload
Years qualified (S2) (n=62)
17 years in practice
LA
I in
itia
tor
No
n-L
AI i
nit
i...0%
100%
100%
0%
LAI initiation (S5) n=62)
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62)
12
Physicians predominantly work in hospital acute care and out-patient clinics, working mainly with out-patients or a mix of in-patients and out-patients
S7 Approximately what percentage of your time spent in direct patient care is in each of the following health care locations? A1 What percentage of your time is spent working with in-patients versus out-patients?
Physician profiling
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62)
%
24%
48%
27%
Mix
Mostly-out-pa-tients
Mostly in-pa-tients
HospitalAcute care 33%Chronic care 8%
Out-patient clinic 28%
Day HospitalIntermediary
2%
Supply: retail Pharmacy
Supply: Hospital Pharmacy
Supply: Hospital Pharmacy
GP clinic 1%
Psych clinic 22%
Supply: retail Pharmacy
13
Physician’s estimate that the most commonly prescribed orals treatment are quetiapine, olanzapine and risperidone. The most commonly prescribed LAI treatment is Risperdal Consta
A2 Thinking about the patients with schizophrenia that you see in a typical month, approximately what proportion would be prescribed each of the following treatments?
RISPERIDONE CONSTA
PALIPERIDONE PALMITATE
OTHER
10%
5%
3%
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62)
Oral treatments LAI anti-psychotics
Physician profiling
OLANZAPINE
RISPERIDONE
CLOZAPINE
QUETIAPINE (Seroquel)
ARIPIPRAZOLE (Abilify)
PALIPERIDONE (Invega)
ZIPRASIDONE (Zeldox)
ASENAPINE (Saphris)
Other
23
22
9
24
11
6
2
4
Note: this question can be compared to actual prescribing collected in the patient record forms (question B22, slide 54)
Note that patients can receive more than one drug, hence percentages add up to more than 100%
14
Main unmet treatment needs are control of negative symptoms and metabolic side effects. Patient adherence is also mentioned by just under half of physicians
A3; Thinking in general about current treatments for schizophrenia, which of these areas do you feel require most improvement? Please select up to 7 options
Physician profiling
Control of negative symptoms
Control of metabolic side effects (including weight gain)
Relapse prevention/maintaining treatment response
Cost/reimbursementLevel of functioning (e.g. in social situations, being able to live inde-
pendently)Control of extrapyramidal side effects (including tardive dyskinesia, but
excluding akathisia)Patient adherence
Early treatment response
Availability of atypical depots
Overall quality of life
Patient satisfaction with treatment
Control of sedation
Control of aggressive symptoms (e.g. hostility and agitation)
Control of akathisia
Control of positive symptoms
Control of prolactin-related side effects (including sexual dysfunction)
Transition from oral to depot medication
Requirement for blood monitoring and/or liver function/liver status
Frequency of dosing
Mode of administration
84%
76%
53%
52%
48%
44%
41%
39%
32%
31%
27%
25%
20%
20%
19%
13%
12%
9%
9%
3%
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62)
15
Presence of side effects and no insight into the disease are perceived to be the main reason for non/partial adherence, over 50% of doctors also note drug/alcohol as a significant reason
A6 What do you think are the main reasons for patient’s not adhering or only partially adhering to their treatment regimen?
Presence of side effects
Not aware of illness (no insight into disease)
Drug/alcohol abuse
Forgetting to take their medicationAware of illness/symptoms, but does not recognise the need for
treatmentBelief that they are cured (lack of
insight)Aware of illness/symptoms, but
unwilling to accept that they have schizophrenia
Concerns about potential side ef-fects
Other disease symptom(s) affecting ability to take medication (e.g.
delusions, hallucinations)Complicated medication regimens
Lack of family supportCognitive impairment (not related to their schizophrenia e.g. dementia,
learning disability)Cost of medication
Other, please specify
85%
76%
52%
48%
45%
39%
26%
26%
24%
21%
19%
11%
13%
0%
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62)
% of physicians
Physician profiling
16
Switching to LAI injection is the most common and successful step to improve partial/non-adherence
A7 Please indicate which of the following steps you commonly use to improve non-adherence / partial adherence in your practice, and how much impact these have on adherence
Switch to depot injection
Simplify medication routine
Re-engage caregiver/support network
Discuss reasons for non-adherence with patient
Switch to other oral antipsychotic with perceived improved effect
Switch to other oral antipsychotic with fewer side effects
Adjust the dose
Initiate/add cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)
Other (n=14)
79%
65%
63%
58%
52%
52%
47%
26%
35%
15%
34%
34%
42%
44%
48%
50%
34%
24%
6%
3%
5%
3%
40%
41%
Use, with good impact Use, with limited/ no impact Do not personally use
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62)
% of physicians
Physician profiling
Patient education / family involvement (n=4)More out-patient visits / increase
monitoring / refer on (n=4)Psychoeducation / family therapy (n=3)
17
69% of physicians are familiar with the term anosognosia, of those, majority believe it means a lack of awareness/insight into the condition
A8 Are you familiar with the term ‘anosognosia’?
69% 26% 5%
Yes, to me this means…Yes, I have heard of it but not sure what it meansNo, not at all
% of physicians
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62); physicians who gave a definition of anosognosia (n=43)
Physician profiling
3%3%3%
92%
Yes, to me this means… (coded responses)
18
Anosognosia is percieved to be mean a patient’s inability to realise they are ill, and a lack of understanding of what their disease is
Source: Physician profiling. Base: physicians who gave a definition of anosognosia (n=43)
“Inability to realise they are ill”
(Psychiatrist, Canada)
“No awareness of their disease symptoms”
(Psychiatrist, Canada )
“Patient not aware of their condition” (Psychiatrist,
Canada)
“Lack of self-assessment of their
disease” (Psychiatrist, Canada)
“No insight into the disease”
(Psychiatrist, Canada)
Yes, to me this means… (verbatim responses)
A8: Are you familiar with the term ‘anosognosia’?
Physician profiling
19
Physicians perceive that three-quarters of patients are moderately/fully unaware of their schizophrenia, however physicians feel that insight can improve in most of these patients
Moderately aware Fully unaware
56%
29%37%
48%
5% 16%2%
6%
Yes, insight can improve
Yes, insight can improve, but only to some extent
No, insight cannot improve
Don’t know
A10 Approximately what proportion of your patients at the current moment fit into each of the following categories in relation to their awareness of their schizophrenia?A11 If a patient is moderately aware / fully unaware of their schizophrenia for a year or more, do you believe the patients’ insight into their disease can improve?
% o
f ph
ysic
ian
s
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62)
36% 39% 25%
Fully aware Moderately aware Fully unaware
Physician profiling
20
Majority of physicians’ treatment decisions are said to be affected by the patient’s insight level, LAI treatment being more likely to be prescribed in patients with a low level of insight than high insight
61%
37%
2%
No impact at all
Some impact
Major impact
2%
82%
16%
... either high or low insight –it does not have a big influ-ence on my decision to pre-scribe a depot medication
... a low level of insight
... a high level of insight
A13a How much impact does the patient’s level of insight into their schizophrenia have on your treatment decision, if any?
% of physicians
Source: Physician profiling. Base: left chart - all (n=62); right chart – physicians whose treatment decision is influenced by level of insight (n=61)
Physician profiling
A13b Are you more likely to prescribe a LAI medication to a patient with…
Note: this question can be compared to actual prescribing of LAIs in patients depending on level of insight collected in the
patient record forms (question B22, slide 51)
21
Non-adherence to treatment is perceived to be the main consequence of poor insight, lower level of functioning is a consequence for 50% of patients
A12 What do you think are the main consequences of a patient’s poor/low level of insight into their schizophrenia?
% of physicians
Source: Physician profiling. Base: all (n=62) Source: Physician profiling. Base: all whose treatment decision is influenced by level of insight (n=61)
Non-adherence to treatment
Lower level of functioning
Lower quality of life (QoL)
Worsening of symptoms
Creates mistrust between doctor-patient
Increased need for caregiver support
Increased workload for treatment team
Lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
Other
79%
50%
45%
39%
37%
23%
18%
6%
2%
Physician profiling
Engage in other medically risky behaviour (cannabis use)
22
Report contents
• Physician profiling• Based on physician’s perception: insight and adherence
Physician insights
• Patient and disease profiling• Patient journey• Patient analysis by level of adherence and insight
Patient insights (based on PRFs)
• Overall prescribing, reasons for prescribing and switching• Exploration around LAI anti-psychotics
Treatment landscape
23
Understanding the data charts for Section B – patient record form data
All patients - rep sample (n=231)
All orals (n=237) All LAIs (n=142) aripiprazole (n=32)
16% 15% 15% 16%
63%68% 67% 69%
19% 16% 17% 16%
2% 1% 1% 0%
Acute Stable with residual symptoms Stable without residual symptoms Other
These data are based on all patients (PRFs) in the
representative sample (i.e. the depot over-sample has been removed). This gives you the
best indication of the total patient population
These sub-groups are based on all prescriptions of orals / LAIs / aripiprazole. These take all prescriptions from both the
representative sample and the oversample. Therefore a patient may be included in all sub-groups (if they are receiving both an
oral and LAI, for example)
NB – This is not actual data
24
Section summary
60% of the last consultations were scheduled or routine follow-ups with 56% of patients getting repeat prescriptions
Almost two thirds of patients are perceived to be stable with residual symptoms, 16% of patients are current acute
57% of patients had no relapses in the last year, 30% have 1 relapse and 13% have more than 2 relapses
Relationship with the physician is the best rated overall and socio-economic factors are the most negatively impacted by the condition
The condition is said to have a negative impact on all QoL aspects, most notably ADLs Less than 15% of currently stable patients are anticipated to become non-adherent in
the near future Patients experience more negative symptoms in general 48% of patients are fully aware of their condition, 38% moderately aware and 14% fully
unaware. Patients receiving LAI treatment are significantly less likely to be fully aware than those on orals
25
Patient profile: 65% of patients are male, around 20% are employed, around 50% have no recorded drug or alcohol use
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total PRFs (n=346)
B1to B5: demographics
PRF
Employment status (paid vs. unpaid)
BMI
Family status (top 2)
35% female and 65% maleAverage age: 40
Age at diagnosis: 27
Mean BMI = 25.6 (overweight)
64% livingindependently/with family
17% receiving some form of care11% without fixed address
Drug/alcohol use
51% do not use at all29% mild use
11% moderate use6% severe
Demographics
38% female and 62% maleAverage age: 41
Age at diagnosis: 28
Mean BMI = 26.1 (overweight)
37% female and 63% maleAverage age: 41
Age at diagnosis: 27
Mean BMI = 25.1 (overweight)
Patients receiving orals Patients receiving LAIs
54% do not use at all29% mild use
11% moderate use5% severe
50% do not use at all27% mild use
13% moderate use7% severe
63% livingindependently/with family18% receiving some form
of care10% other
64% livingindependently/with family
15% receiving some form of care13% without fixed address
Total
12% in paid employment7% in unpaid employment
14% in paid employment7% in unpaid employment
7% in paid employment6% in unpaid employment
26
Scheduled or routine follow up is the main reason for most recent consultation, treatment repeat is the most common action taken by physicians
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Base: Total rep sample (n=231)
B6a: What was the main reason(s) for the patient’s most recent consultation?
Reason Action
ConsultationsOn average 8 consultations per year(orals 8 : LAIs 9)
Scheduled or routine follow up (60%)
Orals 60%: LAIs 63%Treatment repeat (56%)
Orals 57%: LAIs 57%
Treatment stop (1%)Orals 0%: LAIs 0%
Treatment initiation (8%)Orals 7%: LAIs 4%
Treatment restart (7%)Orals 8%: LAIs 11%
Treatment change (24%)Orals 25%: LAIs 27%
Side effects(4%)
Orals 4%: LAIs 4%
Referral (6%)
Orals 5%: LAIs 7%
Diagnosis(10%)
Orals 9%: LAIs 6%
Acute episode /relapse (24%)
Orals 25%: LAIs 23%
Most frequent
Least frequent
PRF
B6b: What action was taken regarding the patient’s schizophrenia treatment?
27
All patients - rep sample (n=231)
All orals (n=237) All LAIs (n=142) aripiprazole (n=32)
16% 15% 15% 16%
63%68% 67% 69%
19%16% 17% 16%
2% 1% 1% 0%
Acute Stable with residual symptoms Stable without residual symptoms Other
Almost two thirds of patients are perceived to be stable with residual symptoms, 16% of patients are currently acute
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231). aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32)
% o
f pa
tient
s
Status X
B12a/b: Current statusPlease indicate the current status of the patient’s schizophrenia using the following options:
PRF
28
Patients’ schizophrenia severity drops by 1.2 (on a 7-point rating scale) between first consultation and current level
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231) aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32)
PRF
At first consultation Current severity
4.6
3.4
4.6
3.4
4.7
3.6
4.7
3.4
All patients - rep sample (n=231) All orals (n=237) All LAIs (n=142) aripiprazole (n=32)
B11: How would you rate the severity of the patient’s schizophrenia? Please answer on a scale of 1-7.
Mea
n s
co
re
Extremely mentally ill (7)
Normal, not at all mentally
ill (1)
29
57% of patients had no relapses in the last year, 30% have 1 relapse and 13% have more than 2 relapses
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231) aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32)
All patients - rep sample (n=231)
All orals (n=237) All LAIs (n=142) aripiprazole (n=32)
57% 56%50%
66%
30% 30% 39%
28%
13% 14% 11% 7%
2 - 5 relapses
1 relapse
0 relapses
B8b: How many psychotic relapses has the patient experienced in the past 12 months?
% o
f pa
tient
s
Mean relapses
PRF
0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4
30
Relationship with the physician is the best rated overall and socio-economic factors are the most negatively impacted by the condition
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231) aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32)
PRF
4.03.7
3.5
2.8
3.6
3.1
4.03.8
3.5
2.9
3.7
3.1
3.83.7
3.3
2.7
3.5
2.9
4.2
3.8 3.7
2.8
3.6
2.8
All patients - rep sample (n=231) All orals (n=237) All LAIs (n=142) aripiprazole (n=32)
B16a Patient circumstances: Please rate the patient’s situation in relation to the following attributes:
Mea
n s
co
re
Very high/ very good (5)
Very low/ very bad (1)
31
The condition is said to have a negative impact on all QoL aspects, most notably ADLs
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231) aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32)
B14 Quality of life: How much impact does the patient’s schizophrenia have on the patient’s…?
PRF
Overall quality of life Activities of daily living (e.g. household chores,
shopping)
Social relationships Ability to work
3.9
3.4
3.84.03.9
3.4
3.84.03.9
3.53.7
4.23.9
3.43.6
3.9
All patients - rep sample (n=231) All orals (n=237)All LAIs (n=142) aripiprazole (n=32)
Mea
n s
co
re
Profound Impact (5)
No impact (1)
32
Less than 15% of currently stable patients are anticipated to become non-adherent in the near future
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=189)
B34 : You described the patient as currently “stable with/without residual symptoms”. Despite the patient being stable, do you anticipate him/her to become non-adherent within the near future?
Total rep sample (n=
189)
Atypical orals (n=190)
Typical orals (n=12)
Aripiprazole (n=26)
Atypical LAIs (n=72)
Typical LAIs (n=47)
79% 77%83%
77% 79% 74%
6% 6% 4% 4%4%
8% 10% 15% 11%13%
7% 6%17%
4% 6% 9%
Don’t know
Yes, I anticipate the patient to become non-adherent within the next 6 months
Yes, I anticipate the patient to become non-adherent within the next 3 months
No, I don’t have any reason to anticipate non-adherence in the near future
PRF
% o
f pa
tient
s
33
Total rep sample (n=231)
Atypical orals (n=227)
Typical orals (n=17)
aripiprazole (n=32)
Atypical LAIs (n=91)
Typical LAIs (n=51)
67% 68%
76%
63%
75% 73%76% 78%
59%
78%74%
76%
53%56%
35%
47%
60%
53%
Positive symptoms (hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, changes in behaviour, disorganised speech)Negative symptoms (lack of interest, social withdrawal, emotional flatness, inability to concentrate)Other symptoms (suicidal thoughts, aggression, irritability, sexual dysfunction, cognitive deficits, anosognosia)
Patients experience more negative symptoms in general
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231), oral prescriptions (n=237), aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32), LAI prescriptions (n=142)
B29: Current symptomsPlease indicate which symptoms the patient currently experiences as part of their schizophrenia
1.5 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.4 1.6
PRF
Mean no. of symptoms
% o
f pa
tient
s
34
48% of patients are fully aware of their condition, 38% moderately aware and 14% fully unaware. Patients receiving LAI treatment are significantly less likely to be fully aware than those on orals
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231) aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32)
B15: Is your patient aware that he/she has schizophrenia?
Total (rep sample) (n=231)
All orals (n=237) All LAIs (n=142) aripiprazole (n=32)
48% 50%
36%
53%
38% 38%
41%
38%
14% 13%23%
9%
Fully unaware
Moderately aware
Fully aware
Mean score 2.3 2.4 2.1 2.4
% o
f pa
tient
s
PRF
Note: this question can be compared to A10 in
the physician perception section
35
Report contents
• Physician profiling• Based on physician’s perception: insight and adherence
Physician insights
• Patient and disease profiling• Patient journey• Patient analysis by level of adherence and insight
Patient insights (based on PRFs)
• Overall prescribing, reasons for prescribing and switching• Exploration around LAI anti-psychotics
Treatment landscape
36
Interactive Dashboard of all data will be provided
This report has selected key points of interest for presentation purposes, but please note that more results can be accessed via the Interactive Dashboard:
This will be provided in Excel format early in 2013
If you have any questions regarding the use of the dashboard, please contact Gitte Esmann (GIES) or the InforMed team ([email protected])
37
Section summary
Hospital psychiatrists are responsible for 50% of atypical treatment, current physicians are responsible for over 50% of typical oral treatment, GPs have some (minimal) involvement, especially for LAI patients
50% of patients are managed in out-patient clinics, this is significantly higher for patients on atypical LAIs compared to atypical orals
Over 80% of patients are currently managed by the respondent physician. GPs and psychiatric nurses also have some involvement in current patient management (19% and 11% respectively)
The average period between symptoms and consultations is 101 weeks, consultation and diagnosis 68 weeks, diagnosis and treatment 53 weeks
36% of patients have been hospitalised within the last year, 18% have never been hospitalised. Patients on aripiprazole are significantly less likely to have hospitalised than those on all atypical orals
Majority of patients were switched from one antipsychotic treatment to another when hospitalised. 24% of patients were discharged on LAI formulations
38
First saw
Diagnosed
Initiated tx
First saw
Diagnosed
Initiated tx
18%
24%
23%
12%
18%
22%
7%
10%
6%
6%
55%
57%
59%
61%
61%
57%
8%
7%
10%
8%
6%
Yourself GP Other Psychiatrist, Hospital Other Psychiatrist, Office
First saw
Diagnosed
Initiated tx
First saw
Diagnosed
Initiated tx
25%
33%
33%
59%
53%
53%
10% 46%
50%
48%
29%
35%
35%
11%
9%
9%
Hospital psychiatrists are responsible for 50% of atypical treatment, current physicians are responsible for over 50% of typical oral treatment, GPs have some (minimal) involvement, especially for LAI patients
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Patients receiving orals (n=237); Patients receiving LAI (n=142)
Patients receiving orals Patients receiving LAIs
B10b: And which of the following healthcare professional(s) are/were responsible for each of the following?
First saw / Diagnosed / Initiated treatment
Atypical
Typical
Atypical
Typical
PRF
“Yourself” indicates that management is by the person completing the survey. Refer to slide 12 for physician's setting
39
B10a: Please indicate which of the following settings the patient is currently managed in?
Total rep sample (n=231)
Atypical orals (n=227)
Typical orals (n=17)
Aripiprazole (n=32)
Atypical LAIs (n=91)
Typical LAIs (n=51)
50% 41%55%
41%59% 67%
29%32%
35%
31%
29%
14% 23%8%
13%
29%
5%
6% 5%14%
9%
18%
21%
8% 8%
10%
6%
6%
9%9%
8%
Outpatient clinic Psychiatric clinic Hospital, acute care Hospital (chronic/long-term care)GP clinic/ PCP clinic Other, please specify
% o
f pa
tient
s
50% of patients are managed in out-patient clinics, this is significantly higher for patients on atypical LAIs compared to atypical orals
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231) aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32)
PRF
Note: this question can be compared to physician
practice setting (slide 12)
40
B10b: Please indicate which of the following Healthcare professionals are responsible for current management of the patients
% o
f pa
tient
s
Total (rep sample) (n=231)
Atypical orals (n=227)
Typical orals (n=17)
aripiprazole (n=32)
Atypical LAIs (n=91)
Typical LAIs (n=51)
84% 85% 88% 81% 86% 88%
19% 20%6%
6%
19% 14%
7% 7%18%
13%
13%5% 6%
6%8%
11% 12%18%
9%
16%16%
5%6% 12%
6%
8% Don’t know / not applicable
Other
Paediatrician / adolescent specialist
Psychiatric nurse
Geriatrician
Clinical psychologist
Neurologist
Other psychiatrist, office
Other psychiatrist, hospital
GP_Primary Care Physician
Yourself
Over 80% of patients are currently managed by the respondent physician. GPs and psychiatric nurses also have some involvement in current patient management (19% and 11% respectively)
PRF
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Total rep sample (n=231) aripiprazole prescriptions (n=32)
“Yourself” indicates that management is by the person completing the survey. Refer to slide 13 for physician's setting
41
The average period between symptoms and consultations is 101 weeks, consultation and diagnosis 68 weeks, diagnosis and treatment 53 weeks
Total (rep sample) (n=170)
oral treatments (n=173) aripiprazole (n=26) LAI treatments (n=97)
101 99
72
97
68 66
20
5253 51
10
53
Symptoms --> consultation First consultation --> diagnosis Diagnosis --> treatment
Source: Patient record forms. Base: rep sample (n=170) Patients receiving orals (n=173); Patients receiving LAIs LAIs (n=97); aripiprazole prescriptions (n=26)
Tim
e (
we
eks
)
B9: Thinking about the patient’s schizophrenia, what was the time period between…
… first experiencing symptoms and first consultation (with yourself or another physician)?
… first consultation and receiving diagnosis?
… diagnosis and initiation of treatment?
B7b: How long has the patient been in your care?
3.5 years in current psychiatrists’ care(3.7 oral: 3.6 LAI)
PRF
Base: all patients with stated timeframes, note actual sample size varies slightly for each part of the question, sample shown is maximum
42
36% of patients have been hospitalised within the last year, 18% have never been hospitalised. Patients on aripiprazole are significantly less likely to have hospitalised than those on all atypical orals
Source: Patient record forms. Base: all (n=346); Orals (n=237) versus aripiprazole (n=32) versus LAIs (n=142)
Yellow box - patient record forms for those who have been hospitalised in the last 12 months/duration (n=128/72)
B17: Has the patient ever been hospitalised for their schizophrenia?
% o
f pa
tient
s
14% 14%24%
16% 15% 18%
22% 20%
24%
16%
36%18%
44% 48%
41%
41%
42%
45%
18% 17%12%
28%
5%
14%
6%
Don't know
No
Yes, more than 12 months ago
Yes, within the last 12 months
Yes, currently hospi-talised
B18: How many times has the patient been hospitalised for their schizophrenia in the last 12 months?2 times hospitalised in the last 12 months
Mean number of hospitalisations in last year
1.2 2.3 1.3 4.5 5.3 1.2
PRF
B19: What was the duration of the most recent schizophrenia-related hospital stay?Duration: 3.7 weeks
When hospitalised:
43
Majority of patients were switched from one antipsychotic treatment to another when hospitalised. 24% of patients were discharged on LAI formulations
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Representative sample. Patients who received an antipsychotic treatment change at discharge from hospital (n=25)
B21a: How was the patient’s antipsychotic treatment changed during his/her stay in hospital?
PRF
B21b: Was the patient discharged on a LAI formulation?
Antipsychotic treatment prescribed for the first time ever
Switch from one antipsychotic to another
Switch to an antipsychotic from another therapeutic category
Switch from an antipsychotic from another therapeutic category
Add-on of an antipsychotic to regimen
Antipsychotic treatment stopped, with no other therapies initiated
Change in dosing of existing antipsychotic
Change in formulation of existing antipsychotic
Other
Don’t know
4%
60%
4%
16%
4%
12%
% of patients
Series1
24%
76%Don't know
No
Yes
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Representative sample. Patients who have previously been hospitalised (n=50)
44
Report contents
• Physician profiling• Based on physician’s perception: insight and adherence
Physician insights
• Patient and disease profiling• Patient journey• Patient analysis by level of adherence and insight
Patient insights (based on PRFs)
• Overall prescribing, reasons for prescribing and switching• Exploration around LAI anti-psychotics
Treatment landscape
45
Less adherent patients are less likely to be employed or living alone, and are more likely to be drug/alcohol users than fully adherent patients
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Fully adherent (n=260), partially (n=78), not at all adherent (n=19)
B1to B5: demographics
PRF
Employment status (paid vs. unpaid)
BMI
Family status (top 2)
39% female and 61% maleAverage age: 41
Age at diagnosis: 27
Mean BMI = 25.7 (overweight)
25% living alone / independently
4% living with partner and children
28% Living with parents
Drug/alcohol use
57% none30% mild use
7% moderate use4% severe
Demographics
35% female and 65% maleAverage age: 41
Age at diagnosis: 28
Mean BMI = 25.7 (overweight)
26% living alone / independently
1% living with partner and children
26% living with parents
16% female and 84% maleAverage age: 38
Age at diagnosis: 32
Mean BMI = 23.6 (overweight)
15% living alone / Independently
5% living with partner and children
32% living with parents
21% none5% mild use
42% moderate use32% severe
38% none32% mild use
22% moderate use4% severe
Partially adherent – 22% Not at all adherent – 5%Fully adherent - 73%
13% in paid employment8% in unpaid employment
8% in paid employment4% in unpaid employment
0% in paid employment0% in unpaid employment
46
Less adherent patients have more relapses, higher severity and rate of hospitalisation, and a low level of insight than fully adherent patients
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Fully adherent (n=260), partially (n=78), not at all adherent (n=19)
B1to B5: disease profile
PRF
Age at diagnosis: 27Years in current psychiatrists
care: 3.8
Normal / borderline ill: 31%Moderate: 62%Severely ill: 7%
Fully aware 52% Moderately aware 35%
Fully unaware 13%
Normal / borderline ill: 13%Moderate: 76%
Severely ill: 12%
Normal / borderline ill: 11%Moderate: 74%
Severely ill: 16%
Number of relapses: 0.5
Fully aware 26% Moderately aware: 55%
Fully unaware 19%
Fully aware 32% Moderately aware: 26%
Fully unaware 42%
Age at diagnosis: 28Years in current psychiatrists
care: 2.9
Age at diagnosis: 32Years in current psychiatrists
care: 2.3
Number of relapses: 0.9 Number of relapses: 1.3
Ever hospitalised: 79%Never hospitalised: 18%
Ever hospitalised: 89%Never hospitalised: 11%
Ever hospitalised: 95%Never hospitalised: 4%
Current severity
Relapses in the last year
Insight
Timeframes
Hospitalisations
Partially adherent – 22% Not at all adherent – 5%Fully adherent - 73%
47
42%
21%
58%
5%
26%
14%
81%
9%
6%
Atypical LAIs (n=71)
Typical LAIs (n=10)
Atypical orals (n=169)
aripiprazole (n=)
Typical orals (n=6)
27%
17%
65%
10%
5%
Patients with lower levels of adherence are more likely to be prescribed LAIs and less likely to receive atypical orals
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Fully adherent (n=260), partially (n=78), not at all adherent (n=19)
B22 Current treatments Which antipsychotic treatment(s) are being prescribed as the patient’s current regimen for schizophrenia?
Mean # treatments = 1.2% on more than 1 treatment = 18%
Mean # = 1.4% on more than 1 = 33%
Mean # = 1.2% on more than 1 = 22%
PRF
Partially adherent – 22% Not at all adherent – 5%Fully adherent – 73%
Note: data taken from total sample (not representative sample). Therefore figures are not indicative of market share
48
Fully unaware patients are less likely to be employed and more likely to be drug/alcohol users than fully aware patients
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Fully aware (n=156), moderately (n=133), fully unaware (n=59)
B1to B5: demographics
PRF
Employment status (paid vs. unpaid)
BMI
Family status(top 2)
36% female and 64% maleAverage age: 41
Age at diagnosis: 27
Mean BMI = 25.9 (overweight)
30% living alone / independently
5% living with partner and children
26% living with parents
Drug/alcohol use
49% none35% mild use
8% moderate use5% severe
Demographics
32% female and 68% maleAverage age: 39
Age at diagnosis: 27
Mean BMI = 25.2 (overweight)
20% living alone / independently
2% living with partner and children
32% living with parents
39% female and 61% maleAverage age: 43
Age at diagnosis: 28
Mean BMI = 25.9 (overweight)
22% living alone / independently
2% living with partner and children
22% living with parents
53% none15% mild use
12% moderate use17% severe
53% none26% mild use
15% moderate use3% severe
Moderately aware – 38% Fully unaware – 17% (low insight)
Fully aware – 45%(high insight)
16% in paid employment8% in unpaid employment
11% in paid employment7% in unpaid employment
3% in paid employment7% in unpaid employment
49
Fully unaware patients have spent less time in the current psychiatrist’s care, had more relapses in the last year, are more severe and have lower adherence than fully aware patients
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Fully aware (n=156), moderately (n=133), fully unaware (n=59)
B1to B5: disease profile
PRF
Age at diagnosis: 27Years in current psychiatrists
care: 4.7
Normal / borderline ill: 44%Moderate: 56%Severely ill: 1%
Full adherent: 84% Partially adherent: 12%
Non-adherent: 4%
Normal / borderline ill: 16%Moderate: 80%Severely ill: 5%
Normal / borderline ill: 5%Moderate: 56%
Severely ill: 39%
Number of relapses: 0.3
Full adherent: 65% Partially adherent: 31
Non-adherent: 5%
Full adherent: 60% Partially adherent: 26%
Non-adherent: 14%
Age at diagnosis: 27Years in current psychiatrists
care: 3.0
Age at diagnosis: 28Years in current psychiatrists
care: 2.0
Number of relapses: 0.8 Number of relapses: 1.0
Ever hospitalised: 80%Never hospitalised: 17%
Ever hospitalised: 92%Never hospitalised: 7%
Ever hospitalised: 81%Never hospitalised: 17%
Current severity
Adherence
Timeframes
Hospitalisations
Relapses in the last year
Moderately aware – 38% Fully unaware – 17% (low insight)
Fully aware – 45%(high insight)
50
45%
17%
55%
5%
2%
28%
16%
63%
9%
8%
Patients with lower level of insight are more likely to receive atypical LAIs and less likely to receive atypical orals
Source: Patient record forms. Base: Fully aware (n=156), moderately (n=133), fully unaware (n=59)
Atypical LAIs (n=)
Typical LAIs (n=)
Atypical orals (n=)
Aripiprazole (n=)
Typical orals (n=)
19%
13%
74%
11%
4%
B22: Current treatments Which antipsychotic treatment(s) are being prescribed as the patient’s current regimen for schizophrenia?
Mean # treatments = 1.2% on more than 1 treatment = 16%
Mean # = 1.2 % on more than 1 = 19%
Mean # = 1.1% on more than 1 = 20%
PRF
Moderately aware – 38% Fully unaware – 17% (low insight)
Fully aware – 45% (high insight)
Note: data taken from total sample (not representative sample). Therefore figures are not indicative of market share
51
Report contents
• Physician profiling• Based on physician’s perception: insight and adherence
Physician insights
• Patient and disease profiling• Patient journey• Patient analysis by level of adherence and insight
Patient insights (based on PRFs)
• Overall prescribing, reasons for prescribing and switching• Exploration around LAI anti-psychotics
Treatment landscape
52
Interactive Dashboard of all data will be provided
This report has selected key points of interest for presentation purposes, but please note that more results can be accessed via the Interactive Dashboard:
This will be provided in Excel format early in 2013
If you have any questions regarding the use of the dashboard, please contact Gitte Esmann (GIES) or the InforMed team ([email protected])
53
Section summary Most commonly prescribed orals are risperidone and olanzapine, Risperdal Consta is the
most commonly prescribed LAI treatment. Risperidone is the most common previously oral treatment, typical LAIs are the most common previously used LAI anti-psychotics
Average patient age is 40 years. Patients receiving aripiprazole are significantly younger than patients receiving other oral treatments
Overall, positive symptoms are the most common reasons for prescribing anti-psychotic treatment, also general attributes are significantly more important reasons for the LAI anti-psychotics. Specifically, treating delusions is the most common reason for prescribing a drug, with positive impact on QoL rated second (although this comes is primary reason for prescribing aripiprazole)• LAIs more likely to be prescribed for anticipated patient adherence than orals• Aripiprazole is more likely to be prescribed for anticipated positive impact on QoL and overall
functioning than other orals Main reason for prescribing LAI treatment is poor adherence with oral therapy, with 22% of
patients also being prescribed it as a more convenient dosing form. Satisfactory adherence with or response to oral therapy are the most common reasons for not prescribing an LAI treatment
50% of treatment switches / discontinuations are due to poor efficacy / symptom control, and 45% due to poor tolerability (significantly higher for orals than LAIs)
Weight gain and sedation are the most common side effects (both significantly more likely with oral treatments), 31% of patients overall experienced no side effects (higher for aripiprazole patients)
54
Current prescribing: Risperidone and olanzapine are the most commonly prescribed oral anti-psychotics, Risperdal Consta is the most commonly prescribed LAI anti-psychotic along with typical LAIs
Source: Patient record form. Base: All patients – rep sample (n=231)
B22: Current treatments Which antipsychotic treatment(s) are being prescribed as the patient’s current regimen for schizophrenia?
OLANZAPINE
RISPERIDONE
CLOZAPINE
QUETIAPINE
ARIPIPRAZOLE
PALIPERIDONE
AMISULPRIDE
ZIPRASIDONE
ASENAPINE
OTHER ATYPICAL
TYPICALS
21%
24%
12%
17%
13%
5%
7%
RISPERIDONE CONSTA
PALIPERIDONE PALMITATE
OTHER ATYPICAL
TYPICALS
4%
2%
5%
Oral treatments LAI anti-psychotics
PRF
Note: this question can be compared to physician’s estimated prescribing
(question A2, slide 13)
Note that patients can receive more than one drug, hence percentages add up to more than 100%
55
RISPERIDONE CONSTA
PALIPERIDONE PALMITATE
OTHER ATYPICAL
TYPICALS
3%
0%
10%
OLANZAPINE
RISPERIDONE
CLOZAPINE
QUETIAPINE
ARIPIPRAZOLE
PALIPERIDONE
AMISULPRIDE
ZIPRASIDONE
ASENAPINE
OTHER ATYPICAL
TYPICALS
23%
26%
3%
11%
4%
3%
19%
Previous prescribing: Was higher for the typicals (especially orals). Risperidone oral is also a common previous treatment
Source: Patient record form. Base: All patients – rep sample (n=231)
B35 Previous treatments Which antipsychotic treatment(s) were prescribed as part of the patient’s previous treatment regimen?
PRF
Oral treatments LAI anti-psychotics
30% have not received any
previous treatment
Note that patients can receive more than one drug, hence percentages add up to more than 100%
56
Average patient age is 40 years. Patients receiving aripiprazole are significantly younger than patients receiving other oral treatments
Source: Patient record form. Base: total rep sample (n=231)
Total (rep sample) - (n=231)
All orals (n=237) All LAIs (n=142) aripiprazole (n=32)
40 41 41
34
B1: Please provide the patient’s year of birth (note, the patient must be 18 years of age or over):
B22: Which antipsychotic treatment(s) are being prescribed as the patient’s current regimen for schizophrenia?
PRF
Me
an
ag
e (
yea
rs)
57
The majority of prescriptions are repeats
Source: Patient record form, prescription level.
Base: oral prescriptions (n=237), LAI prescriptions (n=142).
risperidone consta (n=9)
paliperidone palmitate
(n=5)
olanzapine (n=49)
risperidone (n=55)
clozapine (n=27)
quetiapine (n=40)
aripiprazole (n=29)
paliperidone (n=8)
11%
80%
22%35%
15%
45% 41%
13%
33%20%
7%
7%
10%7%
44%
20%
51% 51%
59%
30% 41%
63%
11% 5%
7%10%
7%25%
7%
Don't know
Other
Switch
Repeat
Restart (have used the drug within the past 6 months)
Start (i.e. newly prescribed, not used the drug previously)
% o
f al
l pre
scrip
tions
B24 Current treatment details. Treatment status - start, repeat, switch, re-start?
PRF
CAUTION: Low bases (n<30)
58
Detailed analysis of treatments: LAIs
LAIs Mean dose (mg)Current & previous
Mean duration of prescribing
Previous/ current
FormulationCurrent & previous
Mean satisfaction(1=very poor, 5 =
very good)Current & previous
Mean adherence(1=fully adherent, 3=non-adherent)
Current & previous
Risperdal Consta 47.5 mg 44.3 / 106 weeks 100% IM depot injection
3.8 / 3.1 1.4 / 1.5
paliperidone palmitate
130 mg 45 / 34 weeks 100% IM depot injection
4.0 / 1.0 1.1 / 1.0
B24 & B36 Drug grids (full text in notes)
PRF
Source: Patient record form, prescription level.
Base: oral prescriptions (n=237), LAI prescriptions (n=142).
59
87%
51%
52%
48%
60%
66%
To treat - positive symptoms
To treat - negative symptoms
To treat - other symptoms
Side-effect profile
General attributes
Patient level attributes
87%
54%
52%
51%
59%
67%
Positive symptoms are the most common reasons for prescribing anti-psychotic treatment, also general attributes are significantly more important reasons for the LAI anti-psychotics
82%
41%
48%
32%
70%
61%
Source: Patient record form, prescription level. Base: all rep sample (n=261) oral prescriptions (n=303), LAI prescriptions (n=185)
B33 Why did you prescribe (drug X) to the patient? Category totals
Oral treatments LAI anti-psychotics
PRF
All treatments - rep sample
Anticipated positive impact on overall quality of lifeAnticipated positive impact on overall functioning (cognitive and social)
• Orals rated higher for treatment of negative symptoms and side-effect profile than LAI anti-psychotics
60
Treating delusions is the most common reason for prescribing a drug, with positive impact on QoL rated second (although this comes is primary reason for prescribing aripiprazole)
Source: Patient record form, prescription level. Base: all rep sample (n=261) oral prescriptions (n=303), LAI prescriptions (n=185)
Total (rep sample) - (n=261) All orals (n=303) All LAIs (n=185) aripiprazole (n=42)
74% 75%
67%
74%
61% 60%
55%
81%
58% 58% 57%55%
51% 52%
48%
74%
47% 46%
39% 40%40%38%
29%
52%
37% 38%
31%
38%36% 36%
48%50%
32% 33% 35%31%30%
28%
20%
29%
Delusions Anticipated positive impact on overall quality of life HallucinationsAnticipated positive impact on overall functioning (cognitive and social) Thought disorder Social withdrawalChanges in behaviour Anticipated (improved) patient adherence IrritabilityInability to concentrate
B33 Why did you prescribe (drug X) to the patient?
PRF
• Orals rated higher for social withdrawal and ability to concentrate than LAI anti-psychotics • LAIs rated higher for anticipated patient adherence• Aripiprazole rated higher for anticipated positive impact on QoL and overall functioning than other
orals
61
B26 Why was the patient prescribed a LAI formulation treatment?
All LAI (n=142) Atypical LAIs (n=91) risperidone consta (n=61)
paliperidone palmitate (n=26)
Typical LAIs (n=51)
78% 77% 82%62%
80%
24% 27% 23%42%
18%
10% 12% 8% 19%14%
18% 15%
27%
8%
11%14%
5%
35%
6%
4%7%
5%
8%
0%
22%
25%
26%
27%
16%
Poor adherence with oral therapy Poor treatment response / residual symptoms Patient request
Family request Side effects/tolerability of previous treatment Anticipated side effects/tolerability of prescribed treatment
More convenient dosing form Other, please specify Don’t know
% o
f pa
tient
s
PRF
Main reasons for prescribing LAI treatment is due to poor adherence with oral therapy, with 22% of patients also being prescribed it as a more convenient dosing form
Source: Patient record forms, prescription level. Base: LAI prescriptions (n=142)
62
Delusions and anticipated positive impact on patient quality of life are consistently the most common reasons for prescribing
Orals Top 3 reasons for prescribing
All orals (n=304)
Delusions– 75%, Anticipated positive impact on QoL – 60%, Hallucinations–
58%
All Atypical orals (n=290)
Delusions– 76%, Anticipated positive impact on QoL – 61%, Hallucinations–
59%
risperidone (n=77)Delusions – 88%, Hallucinations – 76%,
Anticipated positive impact on QoL– 66%
paliperidone (n=10)Delusions– 80%, Social withdrawal –
50%, Emotional flatness – 50%
olanzapine (n=81)Delusions– 2%, Hallucinations – 54%,
Anticipated positve impact on QoL– 51%
aripiprazole (n=42)
Anticipated positive impact on QoL – 81%, Anticipated positive impact on functioning– 74%, Delusions – 74%
All typicals (n=28)
Delusions – 57%, Anticipated positive impact on QoL – 50%, Hallucinations –
46%
LAIs Top 3 reasons for prescribing
All LAI (n=185)
Delusions– 67%, Hallucinations – 57%, Anticipated positive impact on QoL –
55%
Atypical LAIs (n=118)
Delusions– 66%, Hallucinations– 60%, Anticipated positive impact on QoL –
58%
Risperdal Consta (n=76)
Delusions – 61%, Hallucinations– 55%, Anticipated (improved) patient adherence
– 53%
paliperidone palmitate (n=37)
Delusions – 76%, Hallucinations– 70%, Anticipated positive impact on QoL /
Anticipated positive impact on functioning– 67%
olanzapine pamoate (n=0)
Typical LAIs (n=28)Delusions– 69%, hallucinations – 52%,
Anticipated positive impact on QoL– 51%
Source: Patient record forms, prescription level. Base: previous treatments that were switched due to poor efficacy / symptom control
B33 Why did you prescribe (drug X) to the patient?
CAUTION: Low bases (<n=30)
63
B37 Why was (drug X) switched or discontinued from the patient’s previous regimen?
Total (rep sample) - (n=195) All orals (n=197) All LAIs (n=163) aripiprazole (n=36)
48% 51% 46% 47%
45% 47%35%
58%
25% 22%
15%
47%11% 13%
14%
33%
8%8%
17%
3%
9%
11%
21%
Poor efficacy/symptom control Poor tolerability/complaints about side effect(s) Cost/reimbursementPatient request Family request Availability of a new treatment optionFormulary restrictions Inconvenience / not easy to use Mode of administration (i.e. change to different formulation)Other, please specify
% o
f tr
eat
men
ts
PRF
50% of treatment switches / discontinuations are due to poor efficacy / symptom control, and 45% due to poor tolerability (significantly higher for orals than LAIs)
Source: Patient record forms, prescription level. Base: total rep sample (n=195)
• Poor tolerability is less of a reason for switch from LAIs than orals• Switching due to patient request and availability of a new treatment option is more
significant for aripiprazole than other orals
64
Poor efficacy and poor tolerability are consistently the most common reasons for treatment switch, patient request is a common reason for oral switch, mode of administration is a common reason for LAI switch
LAIs Top 3 reasons for switching
All LAI (n=163)
Poor efficacy / symptom control– 46%, Poor tolerability / side effects – 35%,
Mode of administration – 21%
Atypical LAIs (n=108)
Poor efficacy / symptom control– 45%, Rpoor tolerability / side effects – 32%,
Mode of administration– 20%
Risperdal Consta (n=67)
Poor efficacy / symptom control – 36%, Poor tolerability / side effects– 28%,
Mode of administration – 27%
paliperidone palmitate (n=39)
Poor efficacy / symptom control– 64%, Poor tolerability / side effects– 38%,
Availability of new treatment option– 26%
olanzapine pamoate (n=0)
Typical LAIs (n=55)
Poor efficacy / symptom control– 47%, poor tolerability / side effects – 40%,
Mode of administration– 22%
B37 Why was (drug X) switched or discontinued from the patient’s previous regimen?
Source: Patient record forms, prescription level. Base: total rep sample (n=195)
Orals Top 3 reasons for switching
All orals (n=197)
Poor efficacy / symptom control– 51%, Poor tolerability / side effects – 47%,
Patinet request– 22%
All Atypical orals (n=184)
Poor efficacy / symptom control– 49%, Poor tolerability / side effects– 48%,
Patient request– 22%
risperidone (n=25)
Poor tolerability / side effects –56%, Poor efficacy / symptom control– 36%,
Patient request– 16%
*paliperidone (n=9)
Poor tolerabilty / side effects– 44%, Poor efficacy / symptom control– 22%, Patient
request– 22%
olanzapine (n=42)
Poor efficacy / symptom control – 48%, Poor tolerability / side effects – 45%,
patient request– 19%
aripiprazole (n=36)
Poor tolerability / side effects– 58%, poor efficacy / symptom control– 47%,
patient request– 47%
All typicals (n=15)
Poor efficacy / symptom control– 67%, poor tolerability / side effects – 33%,
Patient request – 27%
65
Delusions and hallucinations are consistently perceived as uncontrolled symptoms, social withdrawal and thought disorder are also highlighted as common uncontrolled symptoms
LAIs Top 3 uncontrolled symptoms
All LAI (n=75)Delusions– 81%, Hallucinations – 69%,
Thought disorder – 59%
Atypical LAIs (n=49)Delusions– 82%, hallucinations – 73%,
Thought disorder– 63%
Risperdal Consta (n=24)Delusions– 75%, Hallucinations – 71%,
Thought disorder– 71%
paliperidone palmitate (n=25)Delusions– 88%, hallucinations – 76%,
Social withdrawal– 60%
olanzapine pamoate (n=0)
Typical LAIs (n=26)Delusions– 81%, Hallucinations – 62%,
Irritability– 50%
B37b Which symptom(s) was [drug X] poor in controlling? – symptoms
Source: Patient record forms, prescription level. Base: previous treatments that were switched due to poor efficacy / symptom control
Orals Top 3 uncontrolled symptoms
All orals (n=100)Delusions– 79%, Hallucinations – 66%,
Social withdrawal– 51%
All Atypical orals (n=90)Delusions– 78%, Hallucinations – 63%,
Social withdrawal– 52%
risperidone (n=9)Delusions – 100%, Hallucinations– 67%,
Social withdrawal– 67%
*paliperidone (n=2)Social withdrawal– 100%, Hallucinations
– 100%,
olanzapine (n= 20)
Delusions – 75%, hallucinations– 55%, Social withdrawal / Emotional flatness –
50%
aripiprazole (n=17)Hallucinations – 82%, Delusions – 65%,
Social withdrawal – 53%
All typicals (n=10)Hallucinations – 90%, Delusions– 90%,
Thought disorder– 90%
66
Weight gain and sedation are the most common side effects (both significantly more likely with oral treatments), 31% of patients overall experienced no side effects (higher for aripiprazole patients)
Source: Patient record form, prescription level. Base: total rep sample (n= 261) oral prescriptions (n=305), LAI prescriptions (n=185)
B23: Please indicate which side effects the patient has experienced as a result of taking [drug X], if any?
Total (rep sample) - (n=261) All orals (n=305) All LAIs (n=185) aripiprazole (n=44)
31% 30%
40%
45%
16% 14%
5%7%
38%36%
22%20%
11%12%
20%
5%6%
8%
12%
18%
7% 7%
10%
2%
33%31%
22%
18%
3% 3% 2%5%
No side effects Metabolic side effects (excluding weight gain)
Weight gain Extrapyramidal side effects (including tardive dyskinesia) (not including akathisia)
Akathisia Prolactin-related side effects (including sexual dysfunction)
Sedation Injection site reactions
Other, please specify Don’t know
% o
f pr
escr
iptio
ns
PRF
• Metabolic side effects, weight gain and sedation are higher for orals than LAIs
• EPS are higher for LAIs than orals• Injection site reactions are higher for aripiprazole
than other orals• Weight gain higher for orals versus aripiprazole
67
Weight gain and sedition are consistently rated as the most common side effects,18% of patients receiving aripiprazole highlight akathisia as a side effect
LAIs Top 3 side effects % No side effects
All LAI (n=185)
Weight gain– 22%, Sedation– 22%,
Extrapyramidial side effects – 20%
40%
Atypical LAIs (n=118)
Weight gain– 26%, Sedation– 25%,
Extrapyramidal side effects / Prolactin related
side effects– 12%
41%
Risperdal Consta (n=76)
Weight gain– 32%, Sedation– 28%,
Extrapyramidal side effects– 18%
32%
paliperidone palmitate (n=37)
Sedation – 22%, Weight gain – 14%,
56%
olanzapine pamoate (n=0)
Typical LAIs (n=67)
Extrapyramidal side effects– 34%, Akathisia –
24%, Sedation – 16%
39%
B23: Please indicate which side effects the patient has experienced as a result of taking [drug X], if any?
Orals Top 3 side effects
% No side effects
All orals (n=305)
Weight gain– 36%, Sedation– 31%, Metabolic
side effects – 14%
31%
All Atypical orals (n=292)
Weight gain – 38%, Sedation – 33%,
Metabolic side effects – 15%
30%
risperidone (n=77)
Weight gain– 35%, Sedation– 30%,
extrapyramidal side effects – 18%
30%
*paliperidone (n=10)
Weight gain – 30%, Extrapyramidal side
effects– 20%, Prolactin related side effects – 20%
50%
olanzapine (n=81)
Weight gain– 49%, Weight gain– 25%,
Metabolic side effects – 19%
28%
aripiprazole (n=44)
Weight gain– 20%, Akathisia– 18%, Sedation
– 18%
45%
All typicals (n=28)
Extrapyramidal side effects– 32%, Sedation – 29%, Weight gain– 18%
36%
Source: Patient record form, prescription level. Base: oral prescriptions (n=305), LAI prescriptions (n=185)
68
Report contents
• Physician profiling• Based on physician’s perception: insight and adherence
Physician insights
• Patient and disease profiling• Patient journey• Patient analysis by level of adherence and insight
Patient insights (based on PRFs)
• Overall prescribing, reasons for prescribing and switching• Exploration around LAI anti-psychotics
Treatment landscape
69
All LAIs (n=142) Atypical LAIs (n=91) Risperidone Consta (n=61)
Paliperidone palmitate (n=26)
Typical LAIs (n=51)
35%
48%
69%
12%
30%
20%
15%
35%
47%
20%22%
7%
58% 16%
5%5% 5%11%4% 5% 4%
22%
Don’t know No previous treatment Another LAIs treatment Oral formulation of a different drug
Oral formulation of the same drug
% o
f pa
tient
s
B25 What treatment was the patient (currently on LAI), receiving before their LAI medication?
PRF
In patients on LAIs, 35% of patients were previously receiving an oral formulation of the same drug, 30% an oral formulation of a different drug, 20% another LAI treatment
Source: Patient record forms. Base: patients currently receiving LAI (n=142)
Risperidone (n=6)Olanzapine (n=3)
70
Satisfactory adherence with oral therapy
Satisfactory treatment response to oral therapy
Patient unwillingness
I never offered a depot formulation to the patient
The right drug is not available as a depot formulation
Patient's current condition/symptoms (e.g. delusions, lack of insight into disease or need for treatment)
Family unwillingness
Other, please specify
Practical reason e.g. not being able to attend hospital for injection
Cost/reimbursement
Formulary restrictions
Low experience / familiarity with depot treatment
I am unsure how to approach injections with the patient (e.g. because I don’t want to damage the doctor-patient relationship)
Don’t know
52%
43%
25%
25%
9%
6%
5%
4%
3%
3%
2%
1%
0%
0%
% o
f pa
tient
s
B28 Why is the patient not currently on a LAI formulation treatment?
PRF
Satisfactory adherence with or response to oral therapy are the most common reasons for not prescribing an LAI treatment
Source: Patient record forms. Base: patients not currently receiving LAI (n=197)