gv280 politics in action

1

GV280Politics in Action

Revision lecture

2

1. & 2. Definitions and models

3

The exercise of power by parties, individuals and groups, at the time when they are collectively in control of the state, over matters which are directly connected with the governing of the state.

Public policy – working definition

4

Democratic model of public policy

Party A policies

ELECTION Party A WinsParty A policy

=public policy

Party B policies

PARTY POLICY ELECTION PUBLIC POLICY

5

Pluralist model of public policy

Pre-electionparty policy

Think tanks

Public opinion

Interest groups

Lobbyists

Post electiongovernment policy Public policy

Civil servants

6

• 1. The electorate

• 2. Politicians

• 3. Unelected officials

• 4. Elites

• 5. Interest groups

• 6. Big corporations

• 7. Think tanks

POSSIBLE ACTORS IN THE POLICY PROCESS

7

Pluralism& Rational choice

• Pluralist model: multiple actors are involved in bargaining over and setting public policy

• Rational choice model: actors seek to maximize the benefits they receive

• Not mutually exclusive

8

3. Essence of decision

9

Explaining policy makingIn searching for an explanation, one typically puts himself in the place of the nation, or national government, confronting a problem of foreign affairs, and tries to figure out why he might have chosen the action in question. … [We assume] government behaviour can be most satisfactorily understood by analogy with the purposive acts of individuals. In many cases this is a fruitful assumption. Treating national governments as if they were centrally coordinated, purposive individuals provides a useful shorthand for understanding problems of policy. But this simplification – like all simplifications – obscures as well as reveals. In particular, it obscures the persistently neglected fact of bureaucracy: the ‘maker’ of government policy is not one calculating decisionmaker but is rather a conglomerate of large organizations and political actors. (Allison, p. 3)

10

Model 1: The Rational Actor

• Possible rational explanations for Khrushchev’s actions

• i. Bargaining chip in negotiations over US missiles

• ii. Diversion/trap• iii. Defence of Cuba• iv. Cold War Politics• v. Missile power - a shortcut in the arms race

11

Model 2: Organizational Process

A government consists of a conglomerate of semi-feudal, loosely allied organizations, each with a substantial life of its own. … Governments perceive problems through organizational sensors. Governments define alternatives and estimate consequences as their component organizations process information; governments act as these organizations enact routines. Governmental behaviour can therefore be understood … less as deliberate choices and more as outputs of large organizations functioning according to standard patterns of behaviour. (Allison, p. 67)

12

• 1.THE CUBAN PROBLEM

• 2. THE STRATEGIC PROBLEM

• 3. THE BERLIN PROBLEM

• 4. THE ECONOMIC PROBLEM

Model 3: Bureaucratic Politics

13

4. The players: politicians, civil servants and interest groups

14


Pre-electionparty policy

Think tanks

Public opinion

Interest groups

Lobbyists


Civil servants

15


Interest groups


Civil servants

17

Traditional model of executive power

Prime minister (directs overall policy)

Cabinet (directs individual departmental policy)

Civil service (implements policy)

18

The Core Executive(Taken from Peter Dorey, Policy Making in Britain, Figure 3.1, p. 50)

19

Interest groups and policy networks

Based on resource exchange Dependencies between actors Degree of dependence of each actor can

vary with circumstances

20

Policy communities & issue networksD. Marsh and R A W Rhodes, ‘Policy networks in British politics’, in Marsh and Rhodes (eds), Policy Networks in

British Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992

21

5. Policy and ideology

22

6. Policy and public opinion

23

Edmund Burke, Speech to the Electors of Bristol

3 November 1774

“Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.”

24

Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship IV:Government policy on issue X overlaid on public opinion at t1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

25

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship V:Government policy on issue X overlaid on public opinion at t2

26

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship VI:Government policy on issue X overlaid on public opinion at t3

27

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship VII:Optimal government policy with normal distribution of public

opinion

28

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship VIII:Government policy on issue X overlaid on public opinion at t4

29

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship IX:Government policy realigned to reflect new distribution of public

opinion

30

7. The media and the agenda

31

John Kingdon,Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies

PROBLEMS

POLICIES

POLITICS

32

Example: 1945 implementation of the Welfare State

PROBLEM: the poverty of the 30s depression

POLICY: Beveridge’s welfare state proposals

POLITICS: Labour’s landslide victory in the 1945 general election

Policy window

33

8. Policy and finance

34

Treasury objectives Provide funds for all government activities Limit expenditure to acceptable limits

Maintain control over departmental budgets Input into departments’ policy decisions

Keep expenditure within the bounds of the possible

Avoid excessive taxation (but also maintain necessary levels of taxation)

Maintain funding balance between departments

35

Departmental objectives Fulfil service commitments Achieve targets set by minister/cabinet/PM Show it is vigorously pursuing policies

More spending = more effectiveness Maintain (or increase) funding levels as far as

possible Compete with other departments

36

Common interests Maintain government’s reputation for

competence Deliver effective services

Maintain government’s reputation for financial responsibility Keep costs within reasonable bounds Keep taxes as low as possible

37

Causes of tension Departments believe Treasury sees everything

in terms of money Treasury believes departments don’t

understand financial constraints Departments believe other departments are

over-funded Overspending and underspending

38

9. Policy and ethics

39

John Stuart Mill’s harm principle“The object of this essay is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of compulsion and control. … The principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.” - J. S. Mill, On Liberty and Other Essays ed. John Gray (Oxford: OUP, 1991), pp. 13-14

41

10. The international dimension

42

11. Policy and party competition

43

Duverger’s law

The simple-majority single-ballot system favours the two-party system

Maurice Duverger, Political Parties (London: Methuen, 1954), p. 217

44

Series1

Left-right policy spectrum

LEFTe.g.RedistributionState intervention

RIGHTe.g.

Private property rightsLimited government

45

Series1

Normal distributionof public policy preferences

LEFT RIGHT

46

Series1

Position of the median voter

LEFT median voter RIGHT

47

Series1

Positions of main political parties(notional)


Lab LibDem Con

48

Series1

Positions of main political parties(1980s)


Lab LibDem Con

49

Series1

Positions of main political parties(1997-2000s)


LibDem Lab Con

50

Series1

Positions of main political parties(now?)


Lab LibDem Con

51

11. Inside the think tank

52

• Long history – Fabians blazed the trail• ‘Traditional’ vs ‘advocacy’• Fill gap left by ideology …• … but were themselves influential in establishing ideologies• Helped Thatcherism to get established …• … and helped create New Labour• Evidence of direct impact on policy is thin …• … but they often set the tone for party policy …• … and ex-think tank personnel roam the corridors of power

53

12 Westminster and Whitehall: the legislature and the executive

54

• Executive – initiates legislation• Legislature – scrutinizes legislation (and the actions of

ministers)– Legislative debate– Parliamentary questions– Select Committees

• Civil service-ministerial relations: who is top?– Haldane report (1918) established relationship of interdependency

and cooperation between civil servants and ministers– But this has eroded recently (more ideological/on message

ministers, more special advisers)

55

13. Implementing public policy

56

The policy process (I)

Agenda setting/problem identification

Policy formulation/approval (e.g.

legislation)Implementation

57

The policy process (II)

Agenda setting/problem identification

Policy formulation/approval (e.g.

legislation)

Implementation

gv280 politics in action

Documents