gulf of mexico alliance nutrients priority issue team national water quality monitoring council...
TRANSCRIPT
Gulf of Mexico Alliance Nutrients Priority Issue Team
National Water Quality Monitoring CouncilPensacola, FLFebruary 1, 2011
Kim CavinessMS Dept of Environmental QualityWater Quality Standards Section ChiefGulf Alliance Nutrients PIT Lead
The Gulf of Mexico Alliance
Gulf States’ Governors announced Alliance in March 2006
State Led– AL, FL, LA, MS, and TX
Federally Supported– Support from numerous federal
agencies– Federal workgroup chaired by EPA,
NOAA, and DOI– NOAA, EPA, NASA, and others now
providing funding to support Alliance activities
Receiving national recognition
Action Plan 1
Released March 2006 Identified regional priority issues and State
leads Organized into 5 Priority Issue Teams (PITs)
1. Ecosystem Integration and Assessment2. Environmental Education3. Habitat Conservation and Restoration4. Nutrients5. Water Quality
36-month outcomes Approved/Signed by all 5 Gulf State Governors Shoestring budget support Wrapped up March 2009
Action Plan 2
Released in June 2009 5 Year Plan 6 Priority Issue Teams (PITs)
1. Coastal Community Resilience2. Ecosystem Integration and Assessment3. Environmental Education4. Habitat Conservation and Restoration5. Nutrients6. Water Quality
Action Plan 2
Nutrients PIT Goals 2009-2014
Action 1: Nutrient CharacterizationAction 2: Support Development of
Nutrient CriteriaAction 3: HypoxiaAction 4: Nutrient Reduction
Activities
4 Actions, 22 Action Steps
Tier 2 document and Action Implementation Plans provide more detail for implementation
Numeric Nutrient Criteria
Every State has been given the task of developing numeric nutrient criteria for their waters.
Characterizing nutrients and supporting nutrient criteria development are priorities of the GOMA Nutrient PIT.
To set appropriate nutrient criteria, we must first understand and characterize the nutrients in our systems.
Action 1: Nutrient Characterization
Implement regional nutrient characterization studies to evaluate ecosystem responses and to develop the tools for better characterization of nutrients in coastal waters.
– Nutrient Sources, Fate, Transport, and Effects Studies– Ecosystem Impacts– Socioeconomic Impacts– Strategies for Improved Monitoring and Data Collection– Environmental and Biological Indicators of Nutrient Impacts– Increase Understanding of the Role of Coastal Wetlands
and the Contribution from Adjacent, Freshwater Systems
Understanding Nutrients
Conduct a series of nutrient characterization projects under a common research framework
– Apply the Nutrient Criteria Research Framework developed in a collaborative effort by the Nutrients and WQ PITs
– Across varying water body systems and seasonal conditions
– Collect data and information regarding the sources, fate, transport, and effects of nutrients through the different systems
– Assemble and analyze the information to support efforts to establish appropriate nutrient criteria for coastal waters and estuaries across the Gulf
Applying the Framework
Nutrients PIT has worked to identify funding opportunities to conduct Nutrient Sources, Fate, Transport, and Effects studies across the Gulf
– St. Louis Bay, Mississippi Funded through EPA GMPO
– Weeks Bay, Alabama Funded through NOAA FFO in Support of Nutrients PIT
– Mission-Aransas Bay, Texas Funded through EPA GMPO
– Galveston Bay, Texas Funded through EPA GMPO
Leverage on-going efforts in Tampa Bay
Additional On-Going and Future Nutrient Team Objectives
Developing a Benthic Index of Integrity for the Gulf of Mexico
Exploring the Role of Wetlands in Nutrient Dynamics
Determining the Effects of Freshwater Inflows
Action 2: Supporting State Development of Nutrient Criteria
Identify common state needs and priorities for the development of nutrient criteria and provide support and technical assistance to facilitate a regional approach to nutrient criteria development and management.
– Aligned, Gulf States Approach – Annual Gulf Alliance Nutrient Criteria Conference– Technical Workgroup to Evaluate Appropriate Biological
Assessment Tools, Endpoints, and Nutrient Related Thresholds
– Gulf-wide Classification System– Pilot the Process for Developing and Evaluating Nutrient
Criteria
Supporting Criteria Development
Coastal waters and estuaries are challenging water body types.
Estuaries are receiving water from upstream freshwater sources as well as influence from gulf boundary waters
Develop plan and science that all Gulf States can use Move as a “united front” – as much as possible Develop sound science upon which to develop nutrient
criteria Ensures consistency across the Gulf
Supporting Criteria Development
Kicking off effort to develop a “Regional Nutrient Criteria Development Plan”
– A detailed plan laying out exactly how the Nutrients Team is going to support criteria efforts across the Gulf States
– Identify what the Gulf States consider the critical needs or issues that must be addressed before we can establish criteria
– Implement activities to assist State criteria development efforts
Annual conference Technical workshops Sharing “lessons learned”
Action 3: Increasing Regional Coordination to Reduce Hypoxia
Coordinate strategies and provide guidance to better characterize hypoxia and the resulting socioeconomic impacts.
– Includes Both Localized Hypoxic Events and the Gulf Hypoxic Zone
– Coordinate and Leverage with the Efforts of the Hypoxia Task Force (AP2 and GHAP 2008 Coordination Matrix)
– Monitoring and Modeling Components Included– Coordination of Resources and Research– Promote Information and Technology Exchange between
the Upper and Lower MS River Basin States
Action 4: Reducing Nutrient Inputs
Develop management tools and implement nutrient reduction activities in cooperation with local communities to reduce excess nutrient inputs to estuaries and coastal waters.
– Outreach and Education– Decision Support Toolbox– Increasing Partnerships
Implement BMPs Identify Sources Identify Opportunities for Load Reductions
– Pilot New Innovative Technologies– Nutrient Reduction Strategy Template (available now)– Implementing and Evaluating Nutrient Reduction Strategies
Developing & Implementing Nutrient Reduction Strategies
Mississippi Delta Nutrient Reduction Strategies (2009)
Coastal Nutrient Reduction Strategy Template (2010)
Strategies being developed/implemented through the Alliance and the Hypoxia Task Force
Why Nutrient Reduction Strategies?
Based upon Collaboration among Stakeholders, State/Federal Agencies, NGOs, Academia
Road Map for All State/Federal Agencies, NGO’s, Academia, Stakeholders
Consistent, Repeatable Approaches Applicable to All Scales
Facilitate Needed Research and Planning Guide Implementation Quantify Load Reductions, Costs, and Benefits to
Stakeholders Develop Approaches and Tools to Achieve Nutrient
Criteria
Implementation
Implementation at the State Level Focus on Integration, Collaboration, and Leveraging
– Program Integration – Technical Assistance– Funding
Focus on Comparability– Consistency of Approach– Data Comparability
Nutrient Criteria Are Coming – Strategies Provide a Starting Place for States to Begin to Address How to Reduce Nutrients to our Waters
Team Contacts
Regional Coordinator– Ann Porter (MDEQ)
State Leads – Alabama – Lynn Sisk (ADEM)– Florida – Charles Kovach (FDEP) and Steve Wolfe (FDEP)– Louisiana – Kris Pintado (LDEQ) and Dugan Sabins (LDEQ)– Mississippi – Kim Caviness (MDEQ) – Texas – Clyde Bohmfalk (TCEQ), Laurie Eng (TCEQ), and
George Guillen (UH-CL)
Federal Co-Facilitators– Lael Butler (EPA GMPO)– Laurie Rounds (NOAA)
Questions?