guidelines for the classroom-based assessments and … · 2018-04-04 · science knowledge,...
TRANSCRIPT
1
JuniorCycleScienceGuidelinesfortheClassroom-BasedAssessmentsandAssessmentTaskSecondEdition:ForusewithCBA1April-May2018
3
4
ContentsIntroduction 5
Classroom-BasedAssessments:GeneralInformation 6
Classroom-BasedAssessmentsinScience 10
Classroom-BasedAssessment1:ExtendedExperimentalInvestigation 12
Gettingready 13
CompletingtheExtendedExperimentalInvestigation 15
Decidingonthelevelofachievement 18
Nextsteps 21
Classroom-BasedAssessment2:ScienceinSocietyInvestigation 23
Gettingready 24
CompletingtheScienceinSocietyInvestigation 26
Decidingonthelevelofachievement 30
Nextsteps 33
Appendix1 36
InvestigationPlanforCBA1 36
Appendix2 37
EvaluatingthesuitabilityofatopicforinvestigationforCBA2 37
5
Introduction
Thisdocument,JuniorCycleScience:GuidelinesfortheClassroom-BasedAssessmentsandAssessment
Taskprovides:
§ GeneralinformationonClassroom-BasedAssessments
§ Detail of the nature and scope of the two Classroom-Based Assessments described in the
curriculumspecificationforscience
§ The Features of Quality used to decide the level of achievement in each Classroom-Based
Assessment
§ Guidelinesforschools,teachersandstudentsoncompletingtheClassroom-BasedAssessmentsin
science
§ DetailsoftheAssessmentTaskinscienceandhowtheschoolsupportsitscompletion.
These guidelines should be used in conjunctionwith the curriculum specification for Junior Cycle
Science and theAssessment Toolkit for junior cycle,which includes further details of the Subject
LearningandAssessmentReviewprocessandotheraspectsofjuniorcycleassessmentsetoutinthese
guidelines.
All documentation can be accessed at http://www.curriculumonline.ie/Junior-cycle/Junior-Cycle-
Subjects/Science.AnoutlineofassessmentinjuniorcyclecanbefoundintheFrameworkforJunior
Cycle 2015 which can be accessed at http://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-
Reports/Framework-for-Junior-Cycle-2015.pdf.
6
Classroom-BasedAssessments:General
Information
Classroom-BasedAssessments(CBAs)arebestdescribedastheoccasionswhentheteacherassesses
thestudentsusingthespecifictaskssetoutinthecurriculumspecificationforeachsubject.Theyare
completedwithinthetimeallocatedforscience,whichisaminimumof200hours.TheCBAsandthe
FeaturesofQuality,whichsupportteacherjudgement,aresetoutintheseguidelines.Theassessment
issimilartotheongoingassessmentthatoccurseverydayineveryclass.InthecaseofClassroom-
Based Assessment the teacher’s judgement is recorded for the purpose of subject learning and
assessmentreview,andfortheschool’sreportingtoparentsandstudents.Studentsprepareforthe
Classroom-BasedAssessmentoverspecifiedperiodsoftimeinsecondandthirdyear.Theresultsof
otherprojects,homework,ortestsundertakenbythestudentsinthecourseoftheirnormalclasswork
donotadduptotheawardofadescriptorfortheClassroom-BasedAssessment.
DecidingthelevelofachievementfortheClassroom-Based
Assessments
TherearefourleveldescriptorsofachievementforeachClassroom-BasedAssessment:Exceptional,
Aboveexpectations,Inlinewithexpectations,andYettomeetexpectations
TeachersusetheFeaturesofQuality,setoutintheseguidelines(p19and31),todecidethelevelof
achievementineachClassroom-BasedAssessment.TheFeaturesofQualityarethecriteriausedto
assessthestudentworkasbestfittingoneofthefollowingDescriptors:
• ExceptionaldescribesapieceofworkthatreflectstheFeaturesofQualityfortheClassroom-
BasedAssessmenttoaveryhighstandard.Whilenotnecessarilyperfect,thestrengthsofthe
work far outstrip its flaws, which are minor. Suggestions for improvement are easily
addressablebythestudent.
• AboveexpectationsdescribesapieceofworkthatreflectsalloftheFeaturesofQualityfor
theClassroom-BasedAssessmentverywell.Thestudentshowsaclearunderstandingofhow
tocompleteeachareaofactivityoftheinvestigation,andtheworkispraisedforitsrigour.
Feedbackfromtheteachermightpointtothenecessitytoaddresssomeaspectofthework
inneedoffurtherattentionorpolishing,but,onthewholetheworkisofahighstandard.
7
• In linewith expectations describes a piece ofwork that reflectsmost of the Features of
QualityfortheClassroom-BasedAssessmentwell.Itshowsagoodunderstandingofthetask
in hand and is free from significant error. Feedbackmight point to areas needing further
attentionorcorrection,buttheworkisgenerallycompetentandaccurate.
• Yettomeetexpectationsdescribesapieceofworkthatfallssomewayshortofthedemands
of the Classroom-Based Assessment and its associated Features of Quality. Perhaps the
studenthasmadeagoodattempt,butthetaskhasnotbeengraspedclearlyorismarredby
significant lapses. Feedback will draw attention to fundamental errors that need to be
addressed.
WhenusingtheFeaturesofQualitytoassessthelevelofstudentachievementinaClassroom-Based
Assessment,teachersuse‘on-balance’judgement.TheteachershouldreadtheFeaturesofQuality
(startingwithYet tomeetexpectations)until they reachadescriptor thatbestdescribes thework
beingassessed.Whereitisnotclearlyevidentwhichdescriptorshouldapply,teachersmustcometo
ajudgementbasedontheevidencefromthestudent’sworktoselectthedescriptorthatbestmatches
thestudent’sworkoverall.This‘bestfit’approachallowsteacherstoselectthedescriptorthat‘on
balance’describestheworkbeingassessed.
Teachersshouldnotassumethat theresultsofagroupofstudentsbeingassessedwill followany
particulardistributionpattern,astheworkisbeingjudgedonlyagainsttheFeaturesofQualityrather
thanotherstudents’performances.
TheautonomyoftheschoolinpreparingstudentsfortheClassroom-
BasedAssessments
TheseguidelinesprovideschoolswiththeautonomytocompletetheClassroom-BasedAssessments
sothattheycansuittheparticularneeds,contexts,andcircumstancesofstudentsandtheschool.A
varietyofpossibilitiesarepresentedontheinvestigationtopicsthatcanbechosen.Similarly,variation
mightoccurintherangeofformatsusedbystudentstopresentevidenceoftheirlearning.
8
Howtheschoolsupportsthecompletionoftheassessments.
Theschoolsupportsthecompletionoftheassessmentsby:
§ EnsuringthattheNCCAGuidelinesfortheClassroom-BasedAssessmentsandAssessmentTaskare
providedtoteachers
§ SupportingteachersinrecordingthelevelDescriptorsawardedtoeachstudent
§ Retainingrecordsandpiecesofwork,asappropriate,forthepurposesofSubjectLearningand
AssessmentReview
§ ApplyingtheguidelinesforSubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewsetoutinthisdocument
§ SupportingteachersandstudentsinthecompletionoftheAssessmentTask
§ Following set arrangements for the transfer of the completed Assessment Tasks to the State
ExaminationsCommissionformarking
§ Applyinginclusiveassessmentpracticesassetoutintheseguidelines
§ ReportingtheoutcomesofClassroom-BasedAssessmentstostudentsandtheirparents/guardians
aspartoftheschool’sreportingproceduresandthroughtheJuniorCycleProfileofAchievement
(JCPA).
Furtherinformationcanbefoundhttps://www.ncca.ie/en/junior-cycle/assessment-and-reporting
Reasonablesupport
Tofacilitatedevelopmentalfeedbacktostudentsduringtheirengagementwiththetask,theprocess
ofcompletingtheClassroom-BasedAssessmentshouldbeviewedaspartofteachingandlearning,
and not solely for assessment purposes. It is envisaged that teachers will guide and supervise
throughouttheprocessthrough‘reasonablesupport’.Ifastudentrequiresmorethanwhatisdeemed
tobe‘reasonablesupport’,theteachercanmakeanoteofthelevelofassistanceprovided.Thelevel
ofinitiativedemonstratedbystudentsisanelementoftheFeaturesofQualityusedtodecidethelevel
ofachievementofthestudent’swork.
Reasonablesupportmayinclude:
§ Clarifyingtherequirementsofthetask
9
§ Using annotated examples of student work provided by NCCA to clarify the meaning and
interpretationoftheFeaturesofQualitytostudents
§ Providinginstructionsatstrategicintervalstofacilitatethetimelycompletionoftheinvestigation
andreport
§ Providingsupportsforstudentswithspecialeducationalneeds(SEN)asoutlinedbelow.
It isnotenvisaged that this levelof support involved requires teachers toeditdraft reports,or to
providemodeltextoranswerstobeusedinthestudent’sevidenceoflearning.
Inclusiveassessmentpractice
Specialprovisionsmaybeputinplaceforastudentwithaspecificphysicalorlearningdifficultyto
removeasfaraspossibletheimpactofthedisabilityonthestudent’sperformanceinbothClassroom-
BasedAssessmentsandtheAssessmentTasksothatheorshecandemonstratehisorher levelof
achievement.Theaccommodations–forexample,theuseofIrishSignLanguage,supportprovided
bya SpecialNeedsAssistant, or the supportof assistive technologies– shouldbe in linewith the
arrangementstheschoolhasputinplacetosupportthestudent’slearningthroughouttheschoolyear
andarenotdesignedtocompensateforapossiblelackofachievementarisingfromadisability.
10
Classroom-BasedAssessmentsinScience
TherearetwoClassroom-BasedAssessmentsinScience.TheyareassessedatCommonLevel.They
relatetospecifiedlearningoutcomesandlinktoimportantaspectsofthedevelopmentofstudents’
scienceknowledge,understanding,skills,andvalues.BothClassroom-BasedAssessmentsrelateto
prioritiesfor learningandteachingsuchas investigating,andcommunicating inscience,whileatthesametimedevelopingtheirknowledgeandunderstandingofscience,whicharevitaltoworkinglikeascientist.
(SpecificationforJuniorCycleScience,p22)
Theyarescheduledtobeundertakenbystudentsinadefinedtimeperiodwithinclasscontacttime
toanationaltimetable(asadvisedbytheNCCA)intheschoolcalendar.Followingthesecondofthese
assessments,students,inYearThree,willcompleteanAssessmentTaskwhichismarkedbytheState
ExaminationsCommissionaspartofthestate-certifiedexaminationinScience.TheClassroom-Based
AssessmentsforscienceareoutlinedinFig1below.
Table1:Classroom-BasedAssessments:Science
Classroom-Based
Assessments
Format Studentpreparation Completed
ExtendedExperimentalInvestigation(EEI)
Areportmaybepresentedinawiderangeofformats
Astudentwill,overathree-weekperiod1,formulateascientifichypothesis,planandconductanexperimentalinvestigationtotesttheirhypothesis,generateandanalyseprimarydata,andreflectontheprocess,withsupport/guidancefromtheteacher.
TowardstheendofYearTwo
ScienceinSocietyInvestigation(SSI)
Areportmaybepresentedinawiderangeofformats
Astudentwill,overathree-weekperiod2,researchasocio-scientificissue,analysetheinformation/secondarydatacollected,evaluatetheclaimsandopinionsstudied,anddrawevidence-basedconclusionsabouttheissuesinvolved,withsupport/guidancefromtheteacher.
YearThree
1Thedaterangeduringwhichitisadvisedthethree-weekperiodfortheEEIshouldbeallocated,isprovidedonpage142Thedaterangeduringwhichitisadvisedthethree-weekperiodfortheSSIshouldbeallocated,isprovidedonpage24
11
AssessmentTask
TheAssessmentTaskisawrittentaskcompletedbystudentsduringclasstime.Itisnotmarkedbythe
classteacher,butissenttotheStateExaminationsCommissionformarking.TheAssessmentTaskis
specifiedbytheNCCAandisrelatedtothelearningoutcomesonwhichthesecondClassroom-Based
Assessmentisbased.Inthecaseofscience,thisistheScienceinSocietyInvestigation.Detailsrelating
totheAssessmentTaskaresetoutinFig2below.
Table2:TheAssessmentTask:Science
Format Studentpreparation Completed
StudentscompleteaspecifiedwrittentaskwhichissenttotheSECformarking.
TheAssessmentTaskwilllinktotheScienceinSocietyInvestigation.
FollowingcompletionofthesecondClassroom-BasedAssessmentinYearThree.
12
Classroom-BasedAssessment1:Extended
ExperimentalInvestigation
TheExtendedExperimentalInvestigation(EEI)givesstudentsanopportunitytoresearchaquestion
theyhaveaboutsomescience-relatedphenomenatheyhavecomeacrossinthecourseofthethree
yearsoftheirstudies.Thedevelopmentof inquiry,collaborative,practical,recordingandreporting
skillswill be central here, such as posing questions andmaking predictions,workingwith others,
designingexperiments,conductingexperiments,generatingandrecordingprimarydata,processing
and analysing the data to make valid conclusions, and communicating the method used, data
recorded,findings,andreflectionsontheinvestigation.
The EEI comprises of four areas of activity: questioning and predicting, planning and conducting,
processing and analysing, and reflecting and reporting. It is encouraged, but not required, that
studentscollaboratewithclassmates,exceptwhereitisindicatedthatstudentsmustworkontheir
own.Teachersshouldensurethateachstudentisabletoindividuallyproduceevidencerelatedtothe
Features of Quality of this assessment. Under normal circumstances each student/group should
completeadifferentinvestigation.
Figure1:ProcessforconductingtheEEI
TheExtendedExperimentalInvestigationpromotesstudentengagementthrough:
§ Choiceaboutthetopiconwhichtofocus
§ Choiceaboutcommunicationformats
§ Thepossibilitiesforstudentcollaboration.
Gettingready
• Studentpreparation• TeacherPreparation
CompletingtheCBA
• Generatingevidenceoflearning
Decidingonthelevelofachievement
• FeaturesofQuality
Nextsteps
• SLARmeeting• Feedback• Recordingandreporting
13
ThemainlearningoutcomesassessedbytheExtendedExperimentalInvestigationare:
NatureofScience 1,2,3,4,5and7
Gettingready
Studentpreparation
Studentsshouldhavedevelopedsufficientknowledge,skillsandunderstandingoverthecourseoffirst
andsecondyeartoundertakeanEEI.Aspartofongoingteaching, learningandassessmentof the
learningoutcomesforJuniorCycleScience,studentsshouldhaveopportunitiestodevelopinquiryand
practical skills, including skills tomanipulate and use laboratory equipment safely as they realise
variouslearningoutcomes.Asstudentsprogressthroughjuniorcycle,theyshouldbeencouragedto
identify scientific concepts, ideas and applications that they want to know more about, or
investigationsencounteredthattheywouldliketoextendbyintroducingsomedegreeofcomplexity.
While theClassroom-BasedAssessment is summative, it isenvisaged that throughout juniorcycle,
formativeassessmentbyteachers,thestudentsthemselvesandtheirpeersisusedtoallowstudents,
teachersandparentstoaidtheirdevelopmentandtracktheirprogress.Fromanearlystage,students
shouldbe familiarwith andunderstand the FeaturesofQuality used to judge thequality of their
investigation. This is best achieved when students use success criteria for ongoing assessments
throughoutfirst,second,andthirdyear.
Teacherpreparation
It is importanttosetthetimesanddatesfor implementationasearlyaspossible.Thekeydateto
establishattheoutsetisthetimingoftheSubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewmeetingforthe
EEI.Insettingthisdatetheschoolwillbeguidedbyitsownlocalcircumstancesbearinginmindthat
theEEIassessmentmustbecompletedbytheendofYearTwo.Oncetheschoolhasdecidedonthis
datetheteachersandstudentscanplanforthecompletionoftheEEI.Thetimingoftheprocessmay
varyfromschooltoschoolasthetimelineinTable3offersadegreeofflexibilityforschoolstoschedule
theCBAtoatimewithinthespecifiedtimeperiod.
Gettingready
• Studentpreparation• TeacherPreparation
CompletingtheCBA Decidingonthelevelofachievement
Nextsteps
14
Table3:CompletionofClassroom-BasedAssessment1:ExtendedExperimentalInvestigation
Period3forworkonand
completionofEEI
Friday20thApril2018toFridayMay18th2018
Latestdateforprovisional
awardofDescriptorsbythe
teacher
Thursday24thMay2018
LatestdateforSubject
LearningandAssessment
Review
MondayMay28th2018
InordertobecomefamiliarwiththeassessmentoftheEEI,itwillbehelpfulto:
§ Reviewallthedocumentsoutlinedintheiintroductiontotheseguidelines
§ Download and view annotated examples of EEIs (which will be made available on
www.curriculumonline.ieinSpring2018).
§ DiscusstheassessmentoftheEEIwithyourcolleaguesandplananyteachingandrevisionthat
mayberequired.
3Tobecompletedoverathree-weekperiodwithinthisdaterange.
15
CompletingtheExtendedExperimentalInvestigation
Over the course of three weeks, students will engage in four activities which contribute to the
generationoftheirevidenceoflearningandachievementintheExtendedExperimentalInvestigation
A. Questioningandpredicting
B. Planningandconducting
C. Processingandanalysing
D. Reflectingandreporting
Itisnotintendedtopresenttheactivitiesasarigidandlinearprocess.Eachactivitymayberevisited
atdifferenttimesasstudentscompletetheinvestigation.
A. QuestioningandpredictingForthispartoftheinvestigationstudentsmayworkindividuallyorinsmallgroups.Eachstudentmust
contributetotheworkofthegroup.
§ Choosethetopic:
Thetopicoptionsare:
Water
TheEarth/Moon
/Sunsystem
Food
Plantgrowthand
behaviour
Chemicalreactions
Plastics Forces Energyconservation
§ Decidetheresearchquestion
Onceastudenthasdecidedthetopictheywould liketo investigate, theywillneedtoformulatea
researchquestion.Thequestiontobetestedshouldmeetthefollowingcriteria:
- Itisdrivenbythescientificunderstandingsofoneormoreoftheabovetopics.
GettingreadyCompletingtheCBA
• Generatingevidenceoflearning
Decidingonthelevelofachievement
Nextsteps
16
- Itisopen-ended
- Itlendsitselftoatestablehypothesis
Studentsshouldbegiventimetocollectinformationonthebackgroundtheoryrelatedtotheresearch
question in order to refine their question and to help with the justification of their
hypothesis/prediction.Thisinformationcanbesummarisedintheirresearchrecords.Itisimportant
forstudentstorecordthesourcesofinformationtoensurethattheycanbereferencedinthereport.
§ Writingthehypothesis/prediction
Once students have decided the research question they are advised to form a hypothesis, which
shouldmeetthefollowingcriteria:
- Itdefinesandlinksthevariables
- Itistestable
- Itstestingismanageable
If the investigation ismoreofa ‘trialanderror’nature, thenstudentsmaychooseamoregeneral
statement,aprediction,ratherthanahypothesis.
B. PlanningandconductingFor this part of the investigation studentsmaywork individually or in groups. Each studentmust
contributetothecollectionofdata.
§ Planningtheinvestigation
Studentsshouldbegiventimetohavehands-onexperienceinthelaboratorytoplanandrefinetheir
experimentaldesign,decidewhatequipmentandmaterialswillbenecessary,andassessanypossible
risks.Teachersshouldremindstudentsaboutsafeworkingwhilecarryingouttheinvestigation.
Note:AttheendofthisplanningsessionstudentsshouldworkontheirowntowritetheirInvestigation
Plan(Appendix2),whichtheysubmitindividuallyforinvestigationapproval.Thisshouldtakenomore
than a single class period to complete. Students should not proceed until their teacher has given
approval.Whereateacherhastoprovideassistanceinthedesignoftheinvestigation—because,for
example,theproposedmethodwasdangerous,incomplete,orunworkable—thisshouldberecorded
bytheteacherforconsiderationwhenjudgingthelevelofachievementofthework.However,where
amethodisgood,butunworkableorunmanageableforlogisticalreasons,theteachermaysuggest
changes,andthisshouldnotaffecttheultimatelevelofachievementawardedtothework.
17
§ Conductingtheinvestigation
Onceagain,teachersshouldremindstudentsaboutsafeworkingwhilecarryingouttheinvestigation.
Whereateacherhastoprovideassistancetoensurethesafeassemblyanduseofequipment,this
shouldberecordedbytheteacher.Thereisnospecifiedtimeperiodforthisstageoftheinvestigation.
As a rule of thumb, it should be possible to complete the practical work and data collection in
approximatelyhalfthetimeallocatedfortheEEI.
Studentsshouldnoteintheirresearchrecordsalldata,problemsandchangestomethodusedduring
any preliminary trials. Likewise, all data and problems encountered during the final experiments
shouldberecorded.
C. Processingandanalysing
Forthispartoftheinvestigationstudentsmustworkindividuallytoanalysetheirowndata,perform
anynecessarycalculations,considerhowtobestrepresentandanalysetheirdata,identifypatterns
andrelationships in thedata,explainanyanomalousdata,describetherelationshipsbetweenthe
variables, draw conclusions, and consider if their hypothesis or prediction has or has not been
supported.
D. Reflectingandreporting
Studentsmayworkindividuallyoringroupstoreflectontheirwork.Theyshouldbeencouragedto
critically discuss various aspects of their investigation, such as the design of the experiment and
possibleimprovements,thelimitationsoftheirdata,anypossibletheoreticalorpracticalimplications
oftheirfindings,andfurtherrelatedinvestigationsthattheymightconductandwhy.
Students must work individually to compile the report of their investigation, using the
information/datatheyhaverecordedintheirresearchthroughouttheinvestigation.
Evidenceoflearning
Thefollowingevidenceisrequired:
§ Areport
§ Studentresearchrecords.
18
Students will report their research and findings in a format of their choice. The report can be
completedat theendof the investigation. Ifa typedorhand-written report is the formatof their
choice,thetotallengthofthereportwouldtypicallybeinthe400-600wordsrange(excludingtables,
graphs,referencelistandresearchrecords),butthisshouldnotberegardedasarigidrequirement.
EEIsmaybeeffectivelypresentedinotherformatsbutcaremustbetakenthatalltheworkcanbe
judgedonthefinalproductalone.Forexample,aposterpresentationmayallowstudentstoshow
thattheycanselectandpresenthighlightsoftheirinvestigation,butitmaybeprudenttoincludea
shortwrittenreporttocommunicateanyworkrelatedtotheinvestigationthatisnotrepresentedon
theposter.Whenplanningthecontentoftheirreport,studentsshouldbefamiliarwiththeFeatures
ofQualityusedtojudgethelevelofachievementwhichwillbeawardedtotheirwork.
The teacher can review their own notes to checkwhether a student requiredmore thanwhat is
deemed ‘reasonable support’ (see page 8) in formulating hypotheses/predictions, planning and
conductingtheinvestigation.
Decidingonthelevelofachievement
FeaturesofQuality
KeyFeaturesofQualityinsupportofstudentandteacherjudgementfortheExtendedExperimental
Investigationaredescribedhere.TheFeaturesofQualityarethecriteriausedtoassessthestudent
workasbestfittingoneofthefourDescriptors.BeforeusingtheFeaturesofQualitybelowitmaybe
helpfultoreviewtheinformationon:
§ Making‘on-balance’judgements(page7)
§ Reasonablesupport(page15).
Gettingready CompletingtheCBADecidingonthelevelofachievement
• FeaturesofQuality
Nextsteps
19
FeaturesofQualityfortheExtendedExperimentalInvestigation
Exceptional
Investigating
§ Formsatestablehypothesisorpredictionwithjustification§ Describesconsiderationsrelatedtoreliabilityandfairness§ Outlinesappropriatesafetyconsiderations,anddescribesthemethodusedto
accuratelycollectandrecordgoodquality,reliabledatainamannerthatcouldbeeasilyrepeated
§ Usesaninnovativeapproachthattrulyenhancesthework§ Recordsasufficientamountofgoodqualitydata
Commun
icat
ing
§ Presentsdatainthemostappropriatewayusingrelevantscientificterminologyandinformativerepresentations;calculations, ifany,areperformedtoahighdegreeofaccuracy
§ Describestherelationshipsbetweenthevariables
Know
ledg
ean
dun
derstand
ing
§ Providesa justifiedconclusionsupportedby thedata; identifiesandexplainsanyanomalousdata
§ Usesrelevantscienceknowledgetoassessanddescribewhetherthehypothesishas/hasnotbeensupported
§ Describes indetail thestrengthsandweaknessesoftheirown investigations,includingappropriateimprovementsandorrefinements,orexplainsfullywhynofurtherimprovementscouldreasonablybeachieved
Aboveexpectations
§ Formsatestablehypothesisorpredictionwithjustification§ Identifiesthevariabletobemeasuredandthevariabletobechanged§ Outlines appropriate safety considerations, and describes the method and
equipmentusedtocollectandrecorddata§ Recordsasufficientamountofgoodqualitydata
§ Displaysdataneatlyandaccurately,usingrelevantscientificterminologyand
informative representations; calculations, if any, are performed to a highdegreeofaccuracy
§ Describestherelationshipsbetweenthevariables
§ Drawsaconclusionconsistentwith thedataandcommentsonwhether theconclusionsupportsthehypothesis
§ Identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the investigation and suggestsappropriateimprovements,orexplainswhytheprocedureswereofsufficientquality
20
Inlinewithexpectations
§ Withlimitedguidance,formsatestablehypothesis/prediction§ Describesasafemethodusedtocollectdata-someofthestepsare
understandablebutlacksomedetail§ Recordsraw/primarydata
§ Displaysdataonsimple tables, chartsorgraphs,allowing for someerrors inscalingorplotting
§ Statesarelationshipbetweenthevariables
§ Drawsa conclusionbasedondata collected, identifies some featuresof theinvestigationthatcouldbeimprovedandsuggestsimprovements
Yettomeetexpectations
§ Usesagiveninvestigationquestion§ Isdirectedinusingequipmenttocollectandrecorddata§ Datacollectionmethoddescribedisnotrepeatable
§ Displaysdataonincompletetables,chartsorgraphs,allowingforsignificant
errorsinscalingorplotting
§ Commentsontheinvestigationwithoutmakingaconclusion/refinementtotheinvestigation
21
Nextsteps
SubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewmeeting
Sharedunderstandingof standardswithin junior cyclewill arise throughprofessionaldiscussion in
SubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewmeetingswherestaffbringtheirownexamplesofstudent
workandcomparetheirjudgementswithothercolleagues,withannotatedexamplesofstudentwork
andwith specificationsprovidedby theNCCA.Over time, thisprocesswill helpdevelopa greater
understandingofstandardsandensureconsistencyofjudgementaboutstudentperformance.
Inpreparationforthismeeting,teachersselectexamplesofassessedworktopresentatthereviewmeeting;oneexamplefromeachofthethreelevelsofachievement.Theexamplesshouldnotcarrythestudent’sname.FurtherdetailsonmanagingtheSubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewprocesscanbeaccessedathttps://www.ncca.ie/en/junior-cycle/assessment-and-reporting
Afterthemeeting,eachindividualteacherre-considersthejudgementoftheirstudent’sworkbased
ontheoutcomesofthemeetingandwherenecessarymakestheappropriateadjustmentstothelevel
ofachievementawardedtothework.
UsingFeedback
ProvidingeffectivefeedbackisacrucialstepinusingtheEEItosupportlearninginscience.Students
willbeinformedoftheDescriptortheyhavebeenawardedoncetheSLARmeetinghastakenplace
anditsoutcomeshavebeenprocessed.However,effectivefeedbackgoesbeyondthenamingofthe
Descriptorawarded.Feedbackonthestrengthsofthestudent’swork,andonareasforimprovement
canbeusedtosupporttheirfuturelearning.InformationgatheredduringthecompletionoftheEEI,
andfromtheSubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewmeetingcanbeusedtoinformplanningfor
futureteachingandlearning.
Gettingready CompletingtheCBA Decidingonthelevelofachievement
Nextsteps
• SLARmeeting• Feedback• Recordingandreporting
22
Queryingaresult
QueriesinrelationtotheEEI,wheretheyarise,willbedealtwithbytheschool.
RecordingandreportingfortheJCPA
FollowingtheSubjectLearningandAssessmentReview(SLAR)meetinginaschool,subjectteachers
willmaintainarecordoftheirstudents’achievementsinCBA’sinlinewithschoolsexistingreporting
practices.
EachEEIsubmittedbystudentswillbeawardedoneofthefourleveldescriptorsofachievementfor:
Exceptional,Aboveexpectations,Inlinewithexpectations,andYettomeetexpectations.Ifastudent
doesnotsubmitanEEI,thereisnodescriptortoawardand‘Notreported’willappearontheJCPA.
Further details on how to complete the JCPA is provided in the JUNIOR CYCLE PROFILE OF
ACHIEVEMENT(JCPA)HandbookforSchools,whichcanbeassessedhere:www.education.ie
23
Classroom-BasedAssessment2:Sciencein
SocietyInvestigation
TheScienceinSocietyInvestigation(SSI)givesstudentsanopportunitytoexploreascientifictopicor
issue.Thedevelopmentofresearchandreportingskillsarecentralhere,forexamplesearchingfor
information,discriminatingbetween sources,documenting sourcesused,presentingevidence ina
report,applyingknowledgeofsciencetonewsituationsandanalysingdifferentpointsofviewonthe
issue,drawingconclusionsandcommunicatingpersonalopinion(s)basedontheevidence.
The SSI is an individual research project comprising of three activities: initiating research,
communicating, and evaluating. Students may collaborate with classmates in gathering relevant
informationanddata,buteachstudentmustindividuallyproduceevidencetomeettheFeaturesof
Qualityofthisassessment.
Figure2:ProcessforconductingtheSSI
ScienceinSocietyInvestigationspromotestudentengagementthrough:
§ Choiceaboutthescientifictopicorissueonwhichtofocus
§ Choiceaboutcommunicationformats
§ Thepossibilitiesforstudentcollaboration.
ThemainlearningoutcomesassessedbytheScienceinSocietyInvestigationare:
Nature of Science 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10
Gettingready
• Studentpreparation• TeacherPreparation
CompletingtheCBA
• Generatingevidenceoflearning
Decidingonthelevelofachievement
• FeaturesofQuality
Nextsteps
• AssessmentTask• SLARmeeting• Feedback• Recordingandreporting
24
Gettingready
Studentpreparation
Students shouldhavedevelopedsufficientknowledge, skillsandunderstandingover thecourseof
first,second,andthirdyeartoundertakeanSSIinthemiddleofthirdyear.Aspartofongoingteaching,
learning and assessment of the learning outcomes for Junior Cycle Science, students should have
opportunitiestodevelopresearchskills,includingskillstoreportonandevaluateinformationasthey
realise various learning outcomes. While the Classroom-Based Assessment is summative, it is
envisagedthat,throughoutjuniorcycle,formativeassessmentbyteachers,thestudentsthemselves
andtheirpeersisusedtoallowstudents,teachersandparentstoaidtheirdevelopmentandtrack
theirprogress.Fromanearlystage,studentsshouldbefamiliarwithandunderstandtheFeaturesof
Qualityusedtojudgethequalityoftheirinvestigation.Thisisbestachievedwhenstudentsusesuccess
criteriaforongoingassessmentsthroughoutfirstandsecondyear.
Teacherpreparation
It is importanttosetthetimesanddatesfor implementationasearlyaspossible.Thekeydateto
establishattheoutsetisthetimingoftheSubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewmeetingforthe
SSI.Insettingthisdatetheschoolwillbeguidedbyitsownlocalcircumstancesbearinginmindthat
theSSIassessmentmustbecompletedduringadefinedperiodinYearThree.Oncetheschoolhas
decidedonthisdatetheteachersandstudentscanplanforthecompletionoftheSSI.Thetimingof
theprocessmayvaryfromschooltoschoolasthetimelineinTable4offersadegreeofflexibilityfor
schoolstoscheduletheCBAtoatimewithinthespecifiedtimeperiod.
Gettingready
• Studentpreparation• TeacherPreparation
CompletingtheCBA Decidingonthelevelofachievement
Nextsteps
25
Table4:CompletionofClassroom-BasedAssessment2:ScienceinSocietyInvestigation
Period4forworkonand
completionoftheSSI
Friday7thDecember2018toFriday25thJanuary2019
Windowforcompletionof
theAssessmentTask
Monday28thJanuary-Friday1stFebruary2019
Latestdateforawardof
provisionaldescriptorsby
theteacher
Thursday7thFebruary2019
Latestdateforcompletion
ofSubjectLearningand
AssessmentReview
Monday11thFebruary
InordertobecomefamiliarwiththeassessmentoftheSSI,itwillbehelpfulto:
§ Reviewallthedocumentsoutlinedintheiintroductiontotheseguidelines
§ Download and view annotated examples of SSIs (which will be made available on
www.curriculumonline.ieinAutumn2018)
§ DiscusstheassessmentoftheSSIwithyourcolleagues,andplananyteachingandrevisionthat
mayberequired.
4Tobecompletedoverathree-weekperiodwithinthisdaterange.
26
CompletingtheScienceinSocietyInvestigation
Overthecourseofthreeweeks,studentswillbeengaged inthreeactivitiesthatcontributetothe
generationoftheirevidenceoflearningandachievementintheScienceinSocietyInvestigation:
A. Initiatingresearch
B. Communicatingfindings
C. Evaluatingtheinformationtorespondtothechosenresearchquestion.
Students must work individually to conduct this investigation but they should be encouraged to
discuss,insmallgroups,variousaspectsoftheirinvestigation.
A. Initiatingresearch
§ Choosethetopic
TheSSIrequiresstudentstoinvestigateascientifictopicorissueanditsimpact(positiveornegative)
on society and/or the environment. The chosen topic may be directly related to specific course
contentorstudentsmaydecidetostudyanissueofpersonalorlocalrelevance,provideditisrelated
totheareasoutlinedbelow.Itisimportantthatthetopicchosencanberesearched,hasasoundbase
ofscientificunderstandingandideas,andcanbeturnedintoaquestion.InmanySSIstheremaybe
twoormoreviewsofthetopicorissue,andstudentsshouldbeencouragedtoconsidermorethan
onepointofview.Appendix2includesmaterialtoassistintheevaluationofthesuitabilityofatopic
forinvestigation.
Thechosentopicsshouldrelatetothefollowingareas:
- Atechnologicalapplicationofscience
- Anapplicationofsciencethathasaneffectonhumanhealth
- Anapplicationofsciencethathasaneffectontheenvironment
- Anapplicationofsciencethathasaneffectonsociety.
GettingreadyCompletingtheCBA
• Generatingevidenceoflearning
• Reasonableassistance
Decidingonthelevelofachievement
Nextsteps
27
§ Decidethespecificresearchquestion
Researchshouldbefocusedonaresponsetoaclearly-definedresearchquestion.Itmaybeusefulto
dosomebackgroundreadingofthechosentopic.Theresearchquestionmayberevisedorchanged
asthestudentbeginsresearchingforinformationonthechosentopic.
Tohelpstudentsdeveloptheirresearchquestion,theycould:
- Decidewhattheywanttoknowaboutthechosentopic
- Turnwhattheywanttoknowintoaquestion
- Checktomakesurethatthequestioncanbeanswered–thatit’snottoobroadortoonarrow.
Itisadvisabletoavoidquestionswhich:
- Mightrelatetoagoodsciencetopic,butarenotissue-based,e.g.Whatisnuclearpower?,
Howdoelectronicpassportswork?
- Havelittleornoevidencefororagainsttheissue.
§ Gatherandrecordresearchinformation
Once students have sufficiently developed their research question, they begin to gather
data/information from the internet, newspapers, science journals/magazines, or any other
appropriate source e.g. a survey to support their research findings, or observations of
experiments/investigationsundertakenbythestudent.
Itisimportantforstudentstorecordthesourceofalltheinformationgatheredinordertoassessits
reliabilityandquality (relevance,accuracyandbias)andtoensurethat thesourcesof information
usedcanbereferencedinthereport.
B. Communicatingfindings
§ Selectrelevantinformationfromselectedsources
Studentswill select information (e.g.written text, audio/visual recording, interview notes, charts,
tables, survey responses, observations, diagrams) relevant todeveloping a response to the stated
researchquestion.Informationwillbeselectedto:
28
- Positionthetopicasscienceinsocietyanddiscusstheimpactofthetopiconsocietyand/or
theenvironment,and/oritspersonalorlocalrelevance
- Explain, inthestudent’sownwords,scientificknowledgeand ideasrelevanttothechosen
topic
- Explainintheirownwordsdifferentviewpointsandsidesoftheargument.
Informationshouldnotbe takenverbatim fromsources; it is important for students tobeable to
explain the information in their own words to demonstrate their personal understanding of the
knowledgeandideasrelevanttothechosentopic.
C. Evaluatingtheinformationtorespondtothechosenresearchquestion
Thefollowingstepscansupportstudentsindevelopingapersonalopinionthatisjustifiedonthebasis
oftheselectedinformation:
- Checkwhichsourcesagree/disagreewitheachother
- Considertheinformationfromdifferentpointsofview
- Make judgements about how the information supports, or does not support, a particular
responsetotheresearchquestion.
Studentsmustworkindividuallytocompilethereportoftheirinvestigation.
Evidenceoflearning
Thefollowingevidenceisrequired:
§ Areport
§ Studentresearchrecords.
Students will report their research and findings in a format of their choice. The report can be
completedattheendoftheinvestigationorattheendofeachmainareaofactivityasoutlinedabove.
Ifa typedorhand-writtenreport is the formatof theirchoice,thetotal lengthofawrittenreport
wouldtypicallybeinthe650-800wordsrange(excludingreferencelistandresearchnotes),butthis
shouldnotberegardedasarigidrequirement.SSIsmaybeeffectivelypresentedinotherformats(e.g.
posters,podcasts,ormultimedia),butcaremustbetakenthatalltheresearchcanbejudgedonthe
29
finalproductalone.Forexample,aposterpresentationmayallowstudents toshowthat theycan
selectandpresenthighlightsoftheirresearch,butitmaybeprudenttoincludeawrittenreportof
approximately400wordstoconveythedeeperresearchunderpinningit.Dependingonthechosen
format,somereportsmayinvolvefewerwords,butnonethelesstheywillpresentalltheresearchand
findingsusingothermedia.Whenplanningthecontentoftheirreport,studentsshouldbefamiliar
withtheFeaturesofQualityusedtojudgethelevelofachievementwhichwillbeawardedtotheir
work.
The teacher can review their own notes to checkwhether a student requiredmore thanwhat is
deemed ‘reasonablesupport’ (seepage8) inchoosinga topic for investigation,decidingaspecific
researchquestion,orfindingandrecordinginformation.
30
Decidingonthelevelofachievement
FeaturesofQuality
Key Features of Quality in support of student and teacher judgement for the Science in Society
Investigationaredescribedhere.TheFeaturesofQualityarethecriteriausedtoassessthestudent
workasbestfittingoneofthefourDescriptors.BeforeusingtheFeaturesofQualitybelowitmaybe
helpfultoreviewtheinformationon:
§ Making‘on-balance’judgements(page7)
§ Reasonablesupport(page15).
Gettingready CompletingtheCBADecidingonthelevelofachievement
• FeaturesofQuality
Nextsteps
31
FeaturesofQualityforTheScienceinSocietyInvestigation
Exceptional
Investigating
§ Choosesaninterestingornoveltopicandresearchquestion
§ Finds information about the topic from a large number of varied and balanced
sources,andgivesacompletereferencelist
§ Evaluatesthereliability(relevance,accuracyandbias)ofthesources
§ Considersthequalityoftheinformationcollectedfromthedifferentsources
Commun
icating
§ Clearlypositionsthetopicasscienceinsociety;explainstherelevantscienceand
theimpactofthetopiconsocietyand/ortheenvironment
§ Presentstheinvestigationinaverywell-structuredway(thatisclearandeasyto
read)usingrelevantscientificterminologyandinformativerepresentations;uses
aninnovativeapproachthattrulyenhancesthework
§ Explainsdifferentsidesoftheargumentindetail
Know
ledg
ean
dun
derstand
ing
§ Evaluates all the information; views on the chosen topic are considered and
discussedindepth
§ Linkstheinformationtothetopicunderinvestigation
§ Reviewsalltheinformationusingscienceexplanations
§ Givesapersonalopinionwhichisjustifiedbyreferringtotheinformationevaluated
Aboveexpectations
§ Choosesaninterestingornoveltopicandresearchquestion
§ Findsinformationaboutthetopicfromanumberofbalancedsources,andgives
acompletereferencelist
§ Discussesthereliabilityandquality(relevance,accuracyandbias)ofthesources
§ Positionsthetopicasscienceinsociety;explainstherelevantscienceandthe
impactofthetopiconsocietyand/ortheenvironment
32
§ Presentstheinvestigationinawell-structured(thatisclearandeasytoread),
usingrelevantscientificterminologyandinformativerepresentations
§ Explainsdifferentsidesoftheargument
§ Evaluatesmostoftheinformation,understandinghowparticularsourcesmight
biasscientificpracticesandknowledge
§ Linkstheinformationtothetopicunderinvestigation
§ Reviewsmostoftheinformationusingscienceexplanations
§ Givesapersonalopinionlinkingtheinformationtotheargument
Inlinewithexpectations
§ Choosesatopicandresearchquestionwithsometeacherguidance
§ Findssomeusefulsourcesofinformationaboutthetopicandgivesacomplete
referencelist
§ Givessomeconsiderationtothereliabilityorquality(relevance,accuracyand
bias)ofthesources
§ Mentionsinpassingtheimpactofthetopiconsocietyand/ortheenvironment.
§ Presentstheinvestigationinastructuredwayusingrelevantscientific
terminology
§ Explainsdifferentsidesoftheargument
§ Evaluatesmostoftheinformation,understandingthatparticularsourcesmight
biasscientificpractices
§ Givesapersonalopinionwithsomeexplanation
Yettomeetexpectations
§ Choosesatopicbutisgiventheresearchquestion
§ Isdirectedtosourcesofinformationaboutthetopic
§ Usesveryfewsourceswithlittleevidenceofwhatthesourcesare
§ Presentstheinvestigationusingsomescientificterminology
§ Presentstheinvestigationinawaythatissomewhatstructured
§ Evaluatessomeoftheinformation
§ Givesapersonalopinionwithoutexplanationoralinktotheoriginalquestion
33
Nextsteps
CompletingtheAssessmentTask
StudentsundertakeawrittenAssessmentTasktobesubmittedtotheStateExaminationsCommission
formarkingaspartofthestate-certifiedexaminationforScience. It will be allocated 10% of the marks
used to determine the grade awarded by the SEC. The Assessment Task links to the principal objective
of the SSI, which is to analyse the information/secondary data collected, evaluate the claims and
opinionsstudied,anddrawevidence-basedconclusionsabouttheissuesinvolved.Theknowledgeand
skills developed by students during this Classroom-Based Assessment emerge from their growing
awarenessofscientificinquiry.
TheAssessmentTaskwillcompriseofsomeorallofthefollowing:
§ Engagement with a short stimulus in written, audio, audio-visual or multi-modal format in
preparationforthewrittentask
§ Awrittentaskthatteststhestudentsin:
- theirabilitytoengagecriticallyinabalancedreviewofscientifictexts:evaluatereliability
of sources, analyse and evaluate data, information and evidence, and draw valid
conclusions
- theirabilitytoapplytheirlearningtounseencontextsandsenarios
- theircapacitytoreflectontheskillstheyhavedeveloped
TheAssessmentTaskisofferedataCommonLevelandthequestionsposedwilltakeintoaccountthe
broadcohortofstudentstakingtheassessment.Includingtheengagementwiththestimulusmaterial,
theAssessmentTasktakesapproximatelytwoclassperiods(aminimumof80minutes)tocomplete.
The student response iswritten into apro-formabooklet and the school forwards the completed
studentbookletsfortheAssessmentTaskinaccordancewitharrangementssetoutbytheSEC.The
markawardedfortheAssessmentTaskwillbeaggregatedbytheSECwiththemarkawardedforthe
examinationtodeterminetheoverallgradeforthestate-certifiedfinalexaminationinScience.
Gettingready CompletingtheCBA Decidingonthelevelofachievement
Nextsteps
• AssessmentTask(AT)• SLARmeeting• Feedback• Recordingandreporting
34
WhereastudentisabsentforthecompletionofallorpartoftheAssessmentTask,schoolsshould
makelocalarrangementsintheschooltoallowthestudenttocompletethetaskascloseaspossible
tothetimeframescheduledforcompletion.
ExamplesofAssessmentTasksandguidelinesonhowtoorganiseandmanagetheAssessmentTask
willbemadeavailableatwww.curriculumonline.ieandintheAssessmentToolkitinAutumn2018.
SubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewmeeting
Sharedunderstandingof standardswithin junior cyclewill arise throughprofessionaldiscussion in
SubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewmeetingswherestaffbringtheirownexamplesofstudent
workandcomparetheirjudgementswithothercolleagues,withannotatedexamplesofstudentwork
andwith specificationsprovidedby theNCCA.Over time, thisprocesswill helpdevelopa greater
understandingofstandardsandensureconsistencyofjudgementaboutstudentperformance.
Inpreparationforthismeeting,teachersselectexamplesofassessedworktopresentatthereview
meeting;oneexamplefromeachofthethreelevelsofachievement.Theexamplesshouldnotcarry
thestudent’sname.FurtherdetailsonmanagingtheSubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewprocess
canbeaccessedathttp://www.juniorcycle.ie/Assessment/Review-Meeting
Afterthemeeting,eachindividualteacherre-considersthejudgementoftheirstudent’sworkbased
ontheoutcomesofthemeetingandwherenecessarymakestheappropriateadjustmentstothelevel
ofachievementawardedtothework.
UsingFeedback
ProvidingeffectivefeedbackisacrucialstepinusingtheSSItosupportlearninginscience.Students
willbeinformedoftheDescriptortheyhavebeenawardedoncetheSLARmeetinghastakenplace
anditsoutcomeshavebeenprocessed.However,effectivefeedbackgoesbeyondthenamingofthe
Descriptorawarded.Feedbackonthestrengthsofthestudent’swork,andonareasforimprovement
canbeusedtosupporttheirfuturelearning.InformationgatheredduringthecompletionoftheSSI,
andfromtheSubjectLearningandAssessmentReviewmeetingcanbeusedtoinformplanningfor
futureteachingandlearning.
35
Appealingorqueryingaresult
Studentappeals regardingthestate-certifiedexaminationgrade, inclusiveof theAssessmentTask,
willbeprocessedasperthecurrentappealarrangements.QueriesinrelationtoSSI,wheretheyarise,
willbedealtwithbytheschool.
36
Appendix1
InvestigationPlanforClassroom-BasedAssessment1
Studentname: Date:
Class:
Researchquestion:
Equipmentandmaterialsrequest:
Proposedmethod:
Approvedby: Date:
37
Appendix2
Evaluatingthesuitabilityofatopicforinvestigationfor
Classroom-BasedAssessment2
Sampletopic1:Nuclearpowerplants
Isthistopiccourse-related,anissueof
personalinterest,oronewithlocal
relevance?
Course-related(ES6,PW8)andpossiblyanissueofpersonal
interest.
Canthetopicberesearched? Thereisenoughavailableinformationattheappropriate
levelofcognitivedemandforstudents.
Isthereasoundbaseofscientific
understandingandideas?
Yes
Aretheretwoormoresidestothestory? Therearemanyscientificandsocietalargumentsforand
againstnuclearpowerplants.
Canitturnedintoaspecificresearch
question?
Yes
Conclusion:
ThisisasuitabletopictochooseasabasisforCBA2.
Sampletopic2:Electronicpassports
Isthistopiccourse-related,anissue
personalinterest,oronewithlocal
relevance?
Studentsmayfindthroughresearchthattheelectronics
aspectsarebeyondthescopeofJuniorCycleScience,but
maypursueitasascience-relatedsocietalissueofpersonal
interest.
Canthetopicberesearched? Thereisenoughavailableinformationattheappropriate
levelofcognitivedemandforstudents.
Isthereasoundbaseofscientific
understandingandideas?
Yes
Aretheretwoormoresidestothestory? Onewouldexpectmainlysocietalargumentsforandagainst
electronicpassportstofeatureinthisSSI.
Canitturnedintoaspecificresearch
question?
Yes
Conclusion:
ThisisasuitabletopictochooseasabasisforCBA2.
38