guide to to engineering heritage recognition program prepared by engineering heritage australia a...

ENGINEERING HERITAGERECOGNITION PROGRAM

Guide to

2012

COVER PHOTOS

Clockwise from top:

Sydney Harbour Bridge, built 1932, - awarded NEL in 1988,

New (2012) Engineering Heritage Marker designs,

Grafton to Brisbane National Railway Link - NEHL 2009,

CSIRAC Computer 1949-64 -

The works depicted have been awarded markers under an earlier program. See Appendix J for a comparison of the award levels.

GUIDE TO ENGINEERING HERITAGE RECOGNITION PROGRAM

prepared by

ENGINEERING HERITAGE AUSTRALIA

a Special Interest Group of

the Institution of Engineers Australia (commonly known as Engineers Australia)

approved by EHA National Board November 2012

FOREWORD

Australians have always been an inventive bunch, and none more so than our engineering team. Australia’s history is full of engineering artifacts that were conceived, developed and commercialized in our own backyard. However, we have also tended to suffer from a bit of a “knock it down, and rebuild it modern like” culture particularly at a property development and government level. So many of our iconic buildings have vanished overnight with only photographic images left to remind us of great events and or amazing times past.

The maintenance of our history, and how we arrived at today’s “place” cannot simply be recorded in writing. We need to see, touch and feel our heritage, if we are to truly appreciate its meaning, and how it has contributed to our culture, and to our character as a nation.

This is the vital role that Engineering Heritage Australia, and our heritage groups around the Divisions play. Engineers Australia is committed to preserving our engineering heritage, but preservation must be undertaken within a structured framework that ensures a balance across disciplines, and times, and assesses items against rigorous criteria, reinforced by solid research.

Our Heritage Recognition Program is constantly tracking items that might meet the strict criteria set out in this guide, and through research and evaluation, carefully identifies those engineering artifacts, relics, works, and any other items that will add value to our understanding of Australia’s history. The marking program began in 1984 and, by the end of 2012, interpretative markers had been placed on 165 engineering heritage works.

Any person or any organisation can nominate works for a Heritage Award. I encourage all engineers, as well as the public to bring to the attention of Engineering Heritage Australia any items that you believe might contribute to our overall heritage.

Heritage Engineering is now a recognised and growing discipline in Australia, and I congratulate EHA for their efforts in ensuring that we value our past and that students can gain a better understanding of the evolution of engineering through the marking Program.

David A Hood FIEAust CPEng FIPENZ FISEAM MASCE

National President, 2012

CONTENTSINTRODUCTION 1

Background 1

Definitions and Scope 1

Objectives 2

Strategies 2

HERITAGE RECOGNITION COMMITTEE 2

THE HERITAGE RECOGNITION AWARDS 2Categories of Award 2

The Heritage Markers 3

Provision of an Accompanying Interpretation Panel 3

MAKING A HERITAGE AWARD NOMINATION 4Initial Proposal to Nominate a Work of Engineering for Heritage Recognition 4

Owner’s Agreement 4

Suggested Content of Formal Nomination for Heritage Recognition 4

Preparing a Formal Nomination 5

Submission of the Formal Nomination 5

Nomination of Heritage Collections 5

ASSESSING HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE 6Method for Assessment of Heritage Significance 6

The Statement of Significance 6

MARKERS AND INTERPRETATION PANELS 7Funding and Supply of Markers and Panels 7

Installation of Markers and Panels 7

Ownership of Markers and Panels 7

Replacement of Lost, Stolen or Damaged Markers and Panels 7

Procedure when an Awarded Work is Removed or Demolished 7

DESIGN OF THE INTERPRETATION PANEL 8Submission of an Interpretation Plan 8

EHA & EA Approval of Panel Design 9

Manufacture of the Interpretation Panel 9

HERITAGE RECOGNITION CEREMONY 9Organisation of the Ceremony 9

Unveiling of the Marker and Interpretation Panel 9

Ceremony Report 10

Archiving and Listing 10

Appendix A: Heritage Award Nomination Form 11

Appendix B: Defining & Scoping Engineering Heritage Works for Nomination 12

Appendix C: Heritage Assessment 13Criteria for Assessment of Significance 14

Appendix D: Guidelines for Assessment of Significance: 15Guidelines for INCLUSION 15

Guidelines for EXCLUSION 15

Acknowledgements 15

Appendix E: Example – “Interpretation Plan for The Grafton to Brisbane Railway” 16Interpretation Strategy 16

Structure of the Interpretation Panel for Grafton 16

Design Process for the Panel Content 17

Content of the Interpretation 17

Graphics: 17

Location of the Interpretation Panel and Heritage Marker 17

Appendix F: Professional References for Design of Interpretation Panels 19

Appendix G: Notes for Ceremony Organisers 21Ceremony Organising Committee 21

Ceremony organisation and location 21

Invitations 21

Ceremony brochure 21

Ceremony Proceedings 22

Publicity 22

Ceremony Report 22

Appendix H: Recognition of Heritage Collections 23

Appendix I: Engineering Heritage Australia - Contact Details 23

Appendix J: Markers - Fixing, Care, Ownership & Removal 24Fixing of Markers 24

Care of Markers 24

Ownership and Removal of Markers 24

Appendix K: Change in Terminology: 25

Appendix L: Drawings for interpretation panel mount 27

Guide to Engineering Heritage Recognition Program EHA – 2012

1

ENGINEERING HERITAGE AUSTRALIA

GUIDE TO ENGINEERING HERITAGE RECOGNITION PROGRAM

INTRODUCTION

BackgroundEngineers Australia (EA) established an Australian Historic Engineering “Plaquing” Program in 1984 as a means of bringing public recognition to engineering works of historic or heritage significance and to the engineers who created them. The purpose of the Program was to encourage conservation of Australian engineering heritage and to raise community awareness of engineering and the benefits it provides.

Two categories of awards were made; a ‘National Engineering Landmark’ (NEL) for works which are nationally significant and a ‘Historic Engineering Marker’ (HEM) for works of more local significance. A distinctive disk and a rectangular, explanatory plaque, both in cast bronze, were provided for a NEL. A single rectangular explanatory plaque was provided for the HEM.

In May 2009 the Program was revised, renamed the ‘Heritage Recognition Program’ and, whilst two categories of Award were continued, they were renamed ‘Engineering Heritage National Landmark’ (EHNL) and ‘Engineering Heritage Marker’ (EHM). Both awards are now identified by a more distinctive marker and an interpretation panel. The aim of this revised Program is to attract public attention to these engineering works more effectively and explain their engineering heritage values in terms easily understood by the public.

This 2012 revision introduces a third classification of award, the Engineering Heritage International Marker (EHIM) especially to recognise those engineering works which EHA deems to be of special significance on an international scale. For consistency, the term “landmark” was discontinued in recognition that many recognised works may not fit that physical description. The Guide now also defines the role of EHA’s Heritage Recognition Committee.

Definitions and ScopeThe term ‘work’, or ‘works’ is used to describe an engineering project that can be a design, an item, a place, or a distributed system. Works having engineering value can often be evidenced as earthworks, relic structures, machinery, moveable items, writings, plans, photography or oral histories. ‘Sites’ may include locations of former engineering works since demolished.

The Heritage Recognition Program shall take into consideration the recognition of Australian engineering works even if all engineering heritage relics have been completely cleared from the site.

Engineering heritage works recognised under this program are those judged to be valuable to a group of people, or to have contributed something of value to the nation, a region, or to the practice of engineering. They may include works derived from overseas.

The Heritage Recognition Program shall take into consideration the potential to recognise Australian engineering heritage stories which occur beyond the shores of Australia.

This document is a guide to help with the research, nomination, celebration and interpretation of engineering works for recognition under the Program.

A list of engineering works already recognised by a Heritage Recognition Award can be viewed on Engineering Heritage Australia’s website www.engineeringheritage.com.au. The Marker Register is a .pdf file on the >Activities >Engineering Heritage Recognition Program page.

www.engineeringheritage.com.au.


2

Objectives The objectives of EHA’s Heritage Recognition Program are to relate to the community in the following ways:

Society: Engage with the public in the awareness, enjoyment and conservation of engineering heritage,

Youth: Inspire our youth to consider engineering as a career choice by telling the stories of engineers, their industry, infrastructure and designs in the development of Australia,

Engineers: Develop a sense amongst the engineers of Australia of pride in and appreciation of the history of their profession. Encourage their continuing interest in the care and conservation of Australia’s engineering heritage,

History: Assist in the documentation of Australian engineering history, and foster an understanding of old technologies.

Strategies Divisional groups of Engineering Heritage Australia aim to achieve the above Objectives by:

• researching the history of engineering works, including recording oral histories, to determine their significance to Australian society;

• celebrating the most important works with a heritage award, with the agreement of the owner and/or community organisations having a bona fide interest;

• providing on-site and other interpretations (e.g. guided tours and documentary material) to achieve improved public understanding and appreciation of the heritage of engineering works;

• promoting the conservation of the works by identifying, publicising, recording and listing them on appropriate heritage registers and in relevant journals (Engineering heritage works ‘at risk’ may also be identified and a case made for their conservation.).

HERITAGE RECOGNITION COMMITTEEThe Heritage Recognition Committee is appointed by Engineering Heritage Australia and comprises the Convenor and two other members. The Chair of EHA is an ex-officio member.

The role of the Committee is to:

• consider proposals to nominate for an award (brief exploratory submissions) and provide an opinion as to whether a nomination would be likely to succeed;

• evaluate award nominations and ensure they satisfy the laid down criteria;

• consider proposed interpretation panels and negotiate acceptable wordings with Division groups, who may need to consult owners;

• consider matters relevant to the Heritage Recognition Program and make recommendations to EHA;

• provide advice and information on Heritage Recognition Program matters to Engineers Australia and its members and to others as required; and

• revise and up-date the Heritage Recognition Guide and procedures as required and recommend amendments to EHA.

In evaluating award nominations, members of the Heritage Recognition Committee may use their professional knowledge and will not necessarily rely solely on the information provided. However, it is not their responsibility to undertake further research. They thus may refer particular matters back to the proponent for further information, justification, clarification etc., or to experts in the field.

THE HERITAGE RECOGNITION AWARDS

Categories of AwardThe Program recognises the significance of engineering heritage works in three categories:

Engineering Heritage Marker (EHM),


3

Engineering Heritage National Marker (EHNM), and

Engineering Heritage International Marker (EHIM).

The Engineering Heritage Marker is the appropriate award for the majority of works that satisfy the objectives of this Heritage Recognition Program by demonstrating engineering significance of at least a local level, but may also have had substantial social significance during its lifetime or subsequently Assessing Heritage Significance.The recognition event may mark a major anniversary for the work, or be proposed as part of a broader community celebration recognising a city’s or region’s heritage milestone to which this work of engineering has made a valued contribution.

Engineering Heritage Australia will award the Engineering Heritage National Marker for works which clearly demonstrate outstanding engineering heritage significance at a national level. Such works must have contributed significantly to the development of Australia and would ordinarily represent a milestone or a benchmark by which engineering progress is measured. These works will be seen not only as part of Australia’s engineering heritage, but also as significant components of the national estate.

The Engineering Heritage International Marker is intended for those works which have engineering significance beyond Australia. There are examples in Australia of pre-20th century machinery which are very rare, if not unique, in the world. Other works (or sites) in Australia have played a significant role with international endeavours such as the first Moon landing. Providing these works meet the “inclusion” tests of the heritage significance criteria, they

should be considered for an EHIM award.

The engineering heritage works awarded these honours will be identified by a distinctive eye-catching marker securely fixed at a visible and prominent position on or at the works. The story of the works will be presented by the mounting of an interpretation panel placed as near as possible to the marker.

The Heritage MarkersThe markers are circular disks (approx. 300 mm diameter) bearing Engineers Australia’s stylised coat of arms and the words “Engineering Heritage Marker” (EHM) for the standard marker, “Engineering Heritage National Marker” (EHNM) for works of national significance, and “Engineering Heritage International Marker” (EHIM) for special works of international significance. The purpose of the marker is to advertise prominently and securely, and identify the work. It declares Engineers Australia’s recognition of it as an engineering work of heritage significance.

The marker designs are shown above. They are manufactured using a baked vitreous enamel surface coating on a corrosion-proofed steel disk which gives the most durable finish possible for this distinctive design in colour.

There may be particular circumstances where an alternative marker may be considered more appropriate. Such circumstances should be discussed with the Heritage Recognition Committee early in the development of a nomination for heritage recognition of the work.

Provision of an Accompanying Interpretation PanelEach heritage marker will be accompanied by an interpretation panel designed to engage and inform the public. The panel tells the story of the engineering heritage work. It states why the work is of significance to engineering and society. In doing so, the story may feature the engineers, technologies, organisations, or communities associated with the work.

The content and style of the interpretation panel will primarily target the general public. In doing so, it will also provide an opportunity to demonstrate the objectives of Engineering Heritage Australia, identify Engineers Australia and promote engineering as a profession.


4

There will be sites where interpretation is adequately covered by existing signage, but nominators should ensure that the engineering heritage content of this signage is checked for adequacy and supplemented if necessary.

The intent and wording of the accompanying interpretation panel should, as a minimum requirement: declare heritage recognition of the works by Engineers Australia; explain its relationship to the marker; include an image of the marker to assist in its identification; and show the year of the marking ceremony.

Suggestions for the design of interpretation panels are made in Design of Interpretation Panel

MAKING A HERITAGE AWARD NOMINATIONNominations may be made by any unit of Engineers Australia (EA), such as a Division, College, Society Branch, Panel, Regional Group or Conference Committee, or by any interested organisation or individual. However, all nominations should be submitted through the Divisional EHA group in whose area the work is located.

The Divisional EHA Group shall refer the submitted nomination to the Heritage Recognition Committee, with comments if so desired.

Initial Proposal to Nominate a Work of Engineering for Heritage RecognitionNominators are requested to prepare a brief, exploratory submission entitled “Proposal to Nominate for a Heritage Recognition Award”. This initial proposal, of about 250 words or a typed A4 page, is to be submitted to the Convenor of the Heritage Recognition Committee.

The Proposal should summarise the reasons for the nomination and ceremony and outline the heritage significance of the work. Based on this Proposal and subsequent communications, the Heritage Recognition Committee will provide an opinion on whether or not a nomination would be likely to succeed, and the most appropriate definition, title, scope and award for the works Appendix B . With the knowledge of suitable precedents, the Committee will give any guidance necessary to the nominators for the preparation of a formal nomination.

It is strongly recommended that proposers of an award nomination adopt this preliminary step. The Proposal should be forwarded through the relevant Divisional EHA group for encouragement and endorsement. Contact with these groups can be made via the Administrator of EHA (Appendix I).

Owner’s AgreementAt an early stage, the owners of the work shall be given a copy of the Heritage Recognition Guide (or the web address at which it can be found). When seeking permission to make a nomination, the nominator must obtain written permission from an appropriate level in the owner’s organisation and observe that organisation’s protocols (as applicable).

Suggested Content of Formal Nomination for Heritage RecognitionTo formally nominate a work of engineering for heritage recognition the following information should be identified and submitted to the Heritage Recognition Committee:

• formal nomination form signed by the Chair of the relevant EHA group (Appendix A);• letter of agreement from owner (where known) to EHA’s Heritage Recognition process;• introduction, including brief reason for the recognition process;• definition, scope and title for listing of the work (Appendix B); • Basic Data with location map (Appendix C);• historical review of the work. (For EHNM aspirations, it is usual to engage a competent historian)• a Heritage Assessment of the work, (see below & Assessment Guidelines Appendix D);• a Statement of Significance summarising the assessment result;• an interpretation plan (Appendix E) and initial proposals for the interpretation panel;• proposed budget and funding sources for the research, ceremony and interpretations;• opportunities or special conditions for access & inspection of the work;• responsibility for future care of the marker and interpretation panel;• appendices may also be added to provide documentary evidence sufficient to support the

significance assessment, including references, abstracts, photographs or drawings.


5

Preparing a Formal NominationNominations must be thoroughly and carefully researched with particular attention being paid to the accuracy of dates and statements about historical events. There is great value in using the services of a professional, or at least an experienced amateur, historian to research the history. Claims to uniqueness or superlative characteristics must be supported by adequate documentary evidence. Claims of being the “first”, “last” or “only example” etc. are difficult to establish absolutely and have, on occasions, subsequently been proven incorrect. Primary sources should be consulted as much as possible to avoid errors of fact which may appear in publications, even those by respected authors.

The task of researching and preparing the nomination is the responsibility of the nominating body. Consultation with the relevant Divisional EHA group prior to and during preparation of the nomination is strongly recommended. The basic purpose of preparing a document sufficient for an award nomination (and substantially for nomination to a government heritage register), will best be served by adopting the recommended format which has proven useful in facilitating assessment. All items in this format should be included.

It is also recognised that during the course of preparing the nomination, additional information may be assembled which could add value to the document and be of interest to others. Accordingly, authors may wish to include such information in their reports.

Irrespective of the format, the presentation of nominations should be suitable for deposit in a library or archive. Examples of successful nominations for various types of works are held by the Administrator of EHA. Copies of relevant examples will be supplied on request.

Submission of the Formal Nomination

A formal nomination must be submitted early enough to allow the Heritage Recognition Committee sufficient time to give it adequate consideration. The prior submission and approval of a Proposal to Nominate can assist rapid processing. If the nomination is approved, time must be allowed for an interpretation panel design to be finalised and approved, the panel manufactured and a commemoration ceremony organised. Except in exceptional circumstances, the timetable for submissions should allow six to 12 months before the proposed ceremony.

Nominators are encouraged to provide an early electronic copy of the Nomination, which will expedite the review process and facilitate archival and promotional opportunities.

All steps in the production of the nomination document should be carried out in accordance with current guidelines for the production of archival material. Techniques for recording and archiving photographic and text materials are changing rapidly and there have been many instances in recent years where electronically recorded materials from recent years has become inaccessible, whereas 19th century black and white negatives are still available for interpretation. If in doubt, nominators should consult professionals in the field or the Heritage authorities in their local State or Territory.

At the time of writing, the most appropriate and robust electronic document format is the Adobe “PDF” file type. Users of the software to produce these files should ensure that the full capability of the software is used to produce a file of the appropriate size and resolution. Photographs in the document should be printed at a resolution of no less than 300 dpi and text should be searchable. Even for scanned text, the “professional” edition of the software can be used to ensure this.

The Divisional EHA group should submit an electronic and at least two printed copies of the nomination to the Administrator of Engineering Heritage Australia at the EA National Office, in plenty of time before the proposed date of the heritage award ceremony as noted above.

Where nominators find difficulty in complying with the formal requirements of this Heritage Recognition Guide, they should seek assistance in the preparation of the documents from the Divisional EHA group.

Nomination of Heritage CollectionsSpecial considerations for heritage recognition of engineering heritage collections are suggested inAppendix H.


6

ASSESSING HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCEHeritage significance is not a quality that is easily evaluated. Essentially the Heritage Recognition Program is about recognising engineering works of heritage significance, as opposed to recognising works only of engineering heritage significance. The distinction is important, as engineering has a social purpose and even works that are not remarkable in engineering terms may have provided great social benefits. On the other hand, a work may be highly significant in engineering terms, yet have had little social impact.

It is also possible that an “engineering failure” may for a time have made a significant social contribution, or may have generated research, innovation or invention that has been of great subsequent benefit. In other words, the possible recognition of so-called engineering failures should be determined on the basis of their overall heritage significance and should not be ruled out arbitrarily.

Method for Assessment of Heritage Significance

Assessment should be made using the eight main criteria listed in Appendix C. These criteria are based principally on those used by the NSW Heritage Office in preparing its revised 2001 publication, ‘Assessing Heritage Significance’, which is part of the NSW Heritage Manual. Readers are referred to that publication for a list of contributors and sources. Their contribution is gratefully acknowledged. Other State publications and the Australian Heritage Council Guidelines have also been consulted in an attempt at an Australia-wide uniformity.

A method and guidelines for applying these criteria for heritage assessment are provided in Appendix D. All criteria should be addressed if possible, but the depth will depend on the characteristics and scope of the engineering work being nominated.

Note that age alone does not assure significance, nor need very significant works be old. A returned space probe may be significant at the completion of its brief mission. In most cases, however, heritage status implies high value over some lengthy time span.

The assessment criteria may be addressed to parts as well as the whole of the work and be answered from the point of view of all disciplines. Consultation with relevant specialists may thus be required.

The assessment will assist in nominating the work for listing with the appropriate local, state or national heritage authority as it identifies by and large the information required. However authors should not be concerned at omitting information where it is not readily available, or would require research not essential to the Award nomination.

The Statement of Significance

The Statement of Significance is a most important part of the nomination and summarises the essential information derived from the assessment of heritage significance. Apart from describing the work itself, it must clearly answer the basic question - “why is the work/object significant”? The Statement ensures that the nomination is justified and from it the themes for the interpretation panel are derived. It should not be a repetition of the assessment criteria, or merely a recital of the history of the work.

It is important that all the elements of the work that contribute to its significance are identified, in order that the Statement can be of use in later conservation activity. It is recommended that the Statement contain no more than 250 words.

If the nominator believes that the work(s) are worthy of an EHNM, then the Statement of Significance must demonstrate that the engineering work has outstanding heritage significance at a national level under at least one and preferably more of the assessment criteria listed in Appendix C. Rarity alone is not sufficient justification for an EHNM award.

There are rare occasions when a work is such that an EHIM award is appropriate in which case the significance statement should clearly show the international significance in accordance with the criteria.


7

MARKERS AND INTERPRETATION PANELS

Funding and Supply of Markers and Panels EHA will arrange for the manufacture and delivery of the Heritage Markers. The cost of supplying Markers (including replacements) will be met by Engineering Heritage Australia (EHA). This will also apply to multiple Markers when required to adequately cover the extent of the work; examples have been the Trans-Australian Railway and the Engineering Works of the River Murray. However, where the owner or other authority requests additional Markers beyond what would normally be required, they may be provided at cost to the relevant organisation.

It is expected that, in most cases, the cost of the interpretation panel will be borne by the owner of the engineering works, or the site of the work. This will be an opportunity for the owner to gain some publicity and it is expected that the owner will cooperate in the design of the panel.

Installation of Markers and PanelsThe installation of Markers and Panels, and the funding of any related costs, are to be arranged by the local organising committee. Markers and panels should be mounted in the most prominent, suitable place; accessible and clearly visible to the public.

In some heritage works the installation of a Marker may be inappropriate at, or on, the heritage work itself (for example; for machinery that is in operation and/or inaccessible to the public). In these cases the marker and its associated interpretation panel may be mounted at a nearby, more appropriate location accessible to the public. It will be determined with the agreement of the site or work owner.

Markers should be fixed to a substantial supporting structure such as a wall or piece of rock or the structure being recognised. As they contain no detailed information, they can be mounted at a height which attracts most attention and gives greatest security from possible vandalism.

The fixing of a marker to a heritage structure should be done in a manner that will not adversely affect its heritage value and, where the work is heritage listed, will require the consent of the owner and heritage regulator.

A marker should not be fixed to a heritage structure if it could adversely affect its heritage value. In such a case the marker should be fixed to a substantial support nearby. As the markers and panels are meant to complement one another, they should be mounted in close proximity. It is ideal for the marker to be mounted centrally above and near the Interpretation panel, with the marker out of reach, and the panel at a height allowing school-age children to read it easily. Where this is not possible, the marker may be mounted centrally to the left of the interpretation panel.

The local organising committee should agree with the owner on the location of the markers and panels and provide instructions on installation, method of attachment and care (Appendix J).

Ownership of Markers and Panels All heritage markers (and interpretation panels provided solely by Engineers Australia) will remain the property of Engineers Australia.

It is expected that, in most cases, the resources for funding and maintenance of the interpretation panels will be the responsibility of the owner of the site of the engineering heritage work. This is the preferred strategy of EHA. However any departure from this goal will need to be discussed with the owner, and could possibly involve the cooperation of local historical groups, sponsors, or other community organisations.

Replacement of Lost, Stolen or Damaged Markers and Panels When it is desired to replace a lost, stolen or damaged marker and/or panel, the replacements will be of the current design as described above. It shall have the inscription “(marker or panel) replaced (year as appropriate)” permanently marked on the lower edge of the surface (panel @ lower right hand corner, or marker - centre ). If errors have been corrected, then the inscription should be “(marker or panel) replaced (year) with corrections”.

Procedure when an Awarded Work is Removed or Demolished When an awarded heritage work is removed or demolished, it may be appropriate to retain the interpretation panel, (possibly in association with the marker) to describe the history of the engineering work formerly at the place, together with other relevant information as described above.


8

DESIGN OF THE INTERPRETATION PANELIt is not proposed to establish a standard design for EHA’s interpretation panels. However, Appendix F provides professional references to many on-line guidelines for interpretation that can be used in all stages of the panel’s production.

This eclectic approach recognises that interpretation benefits from the expression of individual styles. Its make-up may vary with the theme, the style preferred by the works owner, preferences and perceptions of the nominating committee, or the inputs from local community organisations, such as historical societies.

In most cases it is expected that the panel will address a number of themes, or stories. These could include: history of the works; personal stories of significant engineers; technical highlights, social impacts, etc. The inclusion of photographs, sketches, maps or design drawings is encouraged for clarity and visual appeal.

Features to watch include: an easily readable font style and size; choice (invention, perhaps) of engaging titles for both the panel, its sub themes and illustrations; simplicity of text, including short sentences and minimisation of jargon; and bite-sized chunks of information for each theme (ie approximately 150 words, say); generous allowance of white space, i.e. avoid crowding between elements.

However, all of the authoritative references on interpretation design will recommend the preparation of an Interpretation Plan, so that the requirements and understanding of all stakeholders to recognition of the heritage works are met, and satisfied.

Submission of an Interpretation PlanIt is expected that an interpretation plan be submitted by the nominators of the works in a section of the nomination documents for approval by the HR Committee on behalf of EHA/EA. The interpretation plan will set out the nominator’s (and / or owner’s) ideas by defining some or all of the following attributes of the proposed interpretation:

Interpretation Strategy - What are the basic mechanisms proposed for telling the story of this work of engineering? As well as interpretation panels, brochures, guided tours, website information, oral & video recordings, etc. are examples of other forms of interpret

Interpretation Panel Content - A summary description of the title, themes, text information and illustrations for the proposed panel.

Graphic Design Process - How will the proposed content be designed into an attractive and appealing panel?

Interpretation Panel Support - What is the proposed mounting structure, materials, finish, and vandal-proof security etc. proposed for the panel? A “standard” steel panel mount design is appended to this guide.

Interpretation Panel for the Grafton to Brisbane National Railway Link - NEHL 2009


9

Finance and Budget - What are the sources of finance and proposed budget allocations for design and manufacture of the panel?

Access and Ongoing Maintenance - The Plan will establish responsibility for the erection, access arrangements, replacement and future maintenance of the marker and interpretation panel.

A sample Interpretation Plan is attached as Appendix E

Acknowledgement of StakeholdersEngineering Heritage Australia and the names and/or logos of those of bona fide organisations involved in the Heritage Award decision (such as the owner), will be included on the interpretation panel, together with the date of the heritage award ceremony. The name of an organisation that has no relationship with the work, either past or present, should not appear. Mere funding of a ceremony, or provision of other financial support, would not necessarily constitute sufficient reason for inclusion of an organisation’s name on a Panel.

EHA & EA Approval of Panel DesignThe final designs for panel content will need the approval of the Heritage Recognition Committee, which acts on behalf of EHA and EA. It is important that the panel’s connection with its accompanying marker is made clear in the interpretation. Any interpretation panel associated with a heritage marker must carry the coat of arms of Engineers Australia as proof of EHA approval and Engineers Australia involvement.

Manufacture of the Interpretation PanelAgain, it is not considered appropriate to create a formal style, template, or structure for EHA’s interpretation panels. These may vary widely with individual circumstances. A panel of a size approximately 1200mm wide by 600 mm high has proven to provide enough space for information on several themes and adequate space (maybe 50 %?) for illustrations.

It is expected that the owner of the engineering work, or the owner of the heritage site, if co-operative, will assist in funding and providing information for the interpretation panel. If already at a heritage precinct, or part of an existing complex, the panel may be designed or styled to match an interpretation theme favoured by the owner.

Interpretation panels should be durable; i.e. constructed with a surface that is resistant to vandalism, corrosion and UV light (where outdoors), and able to be replaced at low cost if wear or damage occurs. They should be solidly and securely mounted on a wall, or on a self-supporting frame that is resistant to vandalism, and sited to avoid any risk of collision with plant or vehicles.

HERITAGE RECOGNITION CEREMONY

Organisation of the CeremonyThe nominating body has the responsibility for overseeing arrangements for organising and financing the award ceremony. To ensure nothing is overlooked and the needs of all stakeholders are met, a ceremony committee may be formed, as described in Appendix G

The owner generally makes the actual arrangements. Early planning is prudent, but no firm commitments should be made until receipt of formal advice that the nomination has been approved.

Once planning starts in earnest, a sense of an important local event can be created by co-opting local organisations and individuals, while keeping a firm hold on the overall organisation. People closely associated with the work, directly or through distant relatives and friends, will appreciate being included in the ceremony. The guidelines for ceremony organisers in Appendix G are based on experience gained from many successful ceremonies.

Unveiling of the Marker and Interpretation PanelThe unveiling of the Marker and/or the Interpretation Panel is usually performed by a senior office bearer of Engineers Australia assisted by a local dignitary (perhaps Governor, politician or mayor) and a representative of the owner.

For an EHNM or EHIM it is desirable that Engineers Australia’s senior representative be the National President, the Deputy President or a Vice President.

Bill

Sticky Note

Needs correction!


10

For an EHM Engineers Australia’s senior representative is usually the Division President, the Senior Vice President or a Vice President.

Ceremony ReportAs indicated at Appendix G a report should be prepared to establish an historical record of the award ceremony. Amongst other things it should include copies of the handout ceremony brochure and program, photographs and any publicity obtained. The production of this report is the responsibility of the relevant division of EHA.

Archiving and ListingThe research that has established the significance of the work has the potential benefits of providing both a reference source for future researchers and information suitable for listing the work with government heritage bodies and the National Trust. Such listing may provide some protection for the work against future demolition or unsympathetic alteration.

To meet these aims:

• documents relating to the award nomination and the award ceremony should be lodged with the relevant State library;

• an electronic copy of the ceremony report should be forwarded to the Administrator of EHA for archiving. This record should include an image of, or record of the contents of the information on the interpretation panel. (At the time of writing, the ‘Portable Document Format’ (e.g. Adobe .pdf) is the preferred format.);

copies of the award nomination, Statement of Significance, interpretation panel, newsletter articles and any other material relevant to the award should be posted on appropriate EA or EHA websites, and;

• subject to the concurrence of the owner, a copy of the Assessment Form should be forwarded to the relevant government heritage body and National Trust, with a request for inclusion of the engineering heritage works on the appropriate heritage register. The assessment form should be forwarded even if the work is already listed, as it will be a further reference and may provide additional relevant information.

• • End of main text - Appendices follow


11

APPENDIX A: HERITAGE AWARD NOMINATION FORM

The AdministratorEngineering Heritage AustraliaEngineers Australia Engineering House11 National CircuitBARTON ACT 2600

Name of work: ..........................................................................................................................................

This work is nominated for an award under the Heritage Recognition Program of Engineers Australia.

Location, including address and map grid reference if a fixed work:.................................................

....................................................................................................................................................................

....................................................................................................................................................................

Owner (name & address): ......................................................................................................................

....................................................................................................................................................................

The owner has been advised of this nomination and a letter of agreement is attached.

Access to site: ...........................................................................................................................................

....................................................................................................................................................................

Nominating Body: ....................................................................................................................................

...............................................

Chair of Nominating Body

Date:

...............................................

Chair of Divisional EHA Group

Date:


12

APPENDIX B: DEFINING & SCOPING ENGINEERING HERITAGE WORKS FOR NOMINATIONIt is important that engineering heritage works nominated for EHA’s heritage recognition be correctly defined, scoped and titled prior to the nomination and approval process commencing. It may be that only a particular part or location of a work was originally intended for recognition, but the outcomes from an EHA recognition process may be improved if the scope or identification of the recognised work is broadened, or in some cases, narrowed. There are several aspects to consider in this process:

What is the most unitary definition of the work in an engineering sense? Engineering heritage works are often difficult to define under government heritage guidelines, most of which have evolved for the conservation of buildings and monuments. For example, some engineering works may be most appropriately defined as a ‘system’, or a ‘network’ which will include multiple geographic locations.

What is the full engineering story represented by the work at the time of its planning & construction.

In terms of heritage significance, what is the scope of the work that has a special significance? (For example: The “Grafton to Brisbane National Railway Link”, rather than the much larger Sydney to Brisbane Railway, was defined for an award of National category because it was only this ‘Link’ which pioneered funding and construction, with the States and Commonwealth cooperating, in a national infrastructure program).

By what identification is the work known in National, State or Local Government heritage registers?

By what name or means of identification is the work best known to the public?

Is the work part of a broader group which is of greater heritage significance? (For example, the “Highway of Lights” (system of eastern coastal lightstations) was given an award in the National category, whereas individual lightstations having only local significance, and might only have attracted an EHM).

Is it possible that, by broadening the scope of the work, a greater number of engineering heritage items can be included in the one nomination, with little extra effort? EHA will encourage the grouping of works if it meets the Objectives of this Program (see example above).

Is there enough research material to support heritage recognition with the defined scope of the engineering heritage work?

Using the Proposal format described, nominators can ask their divisional committee of EHA, or the Heritage Recognition Committee to assist in this definition, scoping and titling at an early stage of the nomination process..


13

APPENDIX C: HERITAGE ASSESSMENT Assessment of the eligibility of the engineering work for a heritage award should address the following topics:

BASIC DATA

Item Name:

Other/Former Names:

Location (grid reference if possible):

Address:

Suburb/Nearest Town:

State:

Local Govt. Area:

Owner:

Current Use:

Former Use (if any):

Designer:

Maker/Builder:

Year Started: Year Completed:

Physical Description:

Physical Condition:

Modifications and Dates:

Historical Notes:

Heritage Listings (information for all listings)

Name:

Title:

Number:

Date:


14

Criteria for Assessment of Significance

Assessment criteria vary slightly among the various Australian jurisdictions, both in the numbering of the criteria and their description. Some criteria are missed from some lists, some combined and some added. Reference should be made to the individual jurisdictions for the criteria used.

The criteria used by Engineering Heritage Australia are an attempt to consider all the variously used criteria and make it possible to mould to criteria used into the listing of the Commonwealth or a particular State or Territory. Often the research done for Engineering Heritage recognition is the only heritage research ever undertaken for a significant work: it has always been the intention of the Engineering Heritage Recognition Program that the nomination document be able to be used with little or no modification for listing by a government authority or the modification or updating of a listing that was not adequate in the first place.

The criteria adopted, with a brief description of each follow. The criteria should be listed in the nomination with a description of the factors which either justify the significance under the criterion of detract from it.

(It should be noted that references to “culture” of “cultural” are made in the context of heritage significance where cultural significance is the sum of the individual significance criteria.)

a. Historical significance: A work is important in the course, or pattern, of cultural history.

b. Historic Individuals or Association: A work has strong or special association with the life or works of a person, or group of persons, of historical importance.

c. Creative or Technical Achievement: A work is important in demonstrating a high degree of creative or technical achievement.

d. Research Potential: A work has potential to yield information that will contribute to an understanding of cultural history.

e. Social: A work has strong or special association with a particular community or cultural group for social, cultural or spiritual reasons.

f. Rarity: A work possesses uncommon, rare or endangered aspects of cultural history.

g. Representativeness: A work is important in demonstrating the principal characteristics of a class of works.

h. Integrity/Intactness: A work is intact as built or has been modified, with a description of such repairs or modifications.

References:

Statement of Significance: (This is the summary of the above criteria assessments which best explains the cultural heritage significance of the work.)

Area of Significance (whether National, State or Local as defined by existing listings)

Image(s) with caption:


15

APPENDIX D: GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE:For each of the listed criteria, critical consideration should be given to whether the assessment can be justified by looking at the “pros” and “cons” of the assessments made.

For example, in the NSW Heritage Manual, there is a booklet on Assessing Heritage Significance1 which sets out guidelines for exclusion and inclusion. Under the Historical criterion (criterion a), is found:

Guidelines for INCLUSION• shows evidence of a significant human activity

• is associated with a significant activity or historical phase

• maintains or shows the continuity of a historical process or activity

Guidelines for EXCLUSION• has incidental or unsubstantiated connections with

• historically important activities or processes

• provides evidence of activities or processes that are of dubious historical importance

• has been so altered that it can no longer provide evidence of a particular association

Each of the criteria has a similar inclusion/exclusion list which can be found in the referenced publication.

In order to make the assessment rationally, good historical research is essential. If the work has the potential for recognition at national or international level it is important that the historical research be carried out professionally with reference to primary sources wherever possible

AcknowledgementsThe use made of the NSW Heritage Manual and the publication of other jurisdictions is gratefully acknowledged.

Readers are referred to that publication for a list of contributors and sources.

1 NSW Heritage Office, Assessing Heritage Significance, 2001.


16

APPENDIX E: EXAMPLE – “INTERPRETATION PLAN FOR THE GRAFTON TO BRISBANE RAILWAY”(The following example from Newcastle division was the first using the new interpretation panel. In the text EHA(N) refers to Engineering Heritage Australia (Newcastle) as the Heritage Branch of Newcastle Division is known.)

Interpretation StrategyStrategy for interpretation of the Engineering Heritage Works is laid out in EHA’s “Guide to the Engineering Heritage Recognition Program” (November 2008).

In an overall sense, interpretation will be by; marking the works with an appropriate category of heritage marker; a public ceremony to unveil that marker; and an interpretation panel which summarises the heritage and significant features of the works for the public.

It is proposed, in fact, to prepare interpretation panels at two locations. The first and most immediate requirement is for an interpretation at Grafton adjacent to the Clarence River Bridge.

This Interpretation Plan deals only with the interpretation panel proposed for the Grafton site (Another panel is proposed for the ‘Cougal Spiral’ lookout, also as part of this HR program, but will be addressed later.)

This Plan provides a summary of the proposals for design, content, location, manufacture and funding of the proposed Grafton panel.

Structure of the Interpretation Panel for GraftonIn accordance with the latest international designs, the panel will be a self-standing sign mounted at waist height, inclined at a 30 - 40 degree angle from the horizontal to facilitate viewing by a person standing facing the panel.

The size of the panel itself will be approx: w: 1200 mm x d: 600 mm.

The panel material could appropriately be one of a number of suitable materials that meets high standards of corrosion and vandal resistance.

Figure USS Constitution interpretation panel, (USA Parks Service, Boston USA)


17

The panel surface coating containing the image could also be provided by a number of modern interpretive products now marketed for this purpose; including vitreous enamel (on steel surface), or plasticised surface-coatings. It must meet high standards of image definition, colour-fastness and scratch resistance.

The panel will be mounted on a solid and strong stand that deters/resists attack from vandals, but on the other hand provides a pleasing and clean appearance.

A photograph of the latest, 2008 ‘standard’ interpretation panel currently used by the Parks Service of the USA is shown in the adjacent figure, and this design is highly recommended.

Design Process for the Panel ContentThe basic panel content will be proposed and an initial layout developed by Engineering Heritage Australia (Newcastle) [EHA(N)]. Both the consultant historian, Dr Robert Lee and EHA(N)’s partner and sponsor of the heritage recognition award, the ARTC, will be consulted in preparing the content.

When satisfactory design content has been achieved, it will be submitted for the approval of the EHA HR Committee., and ARTC. Following approval of the draft design and content, it will be submitted to the EA’s Marketing Manager in the Canberra office, who will finalise the graphical content and prepare an .eps (vector graphics) file required by the surface-coating manufacturer.

Content of the InterpretationA summary of the proposed content is provided below:

Title: The title of the interpretation is proposed to be “The Grafton to Brisbane National Railway Link”. This title, while not officially acknowledged during the history of the railway, has been chosen by the nominators both to define the physicality of the section submitted for nomination as a heritage works, and also to reflect the significant and broad ‘national’ qualities for which the railway link is being recognised. It also tries to avoid technical jargon in attracting the public’s attention to the issues being presented.

Layout: In accordance with good interpretation practice (Appendix F) the content of the panel will be divided into three themes for ease of understanding by the public.

Primary theme (historical): A body of text will be derived from the nomination document to summarise the railway link itself. It will briefly discuss each of; the route, the purpose of the railway, the major engineering features and its operational success.

Secondary theme (engineering): The Clarence River Bridge of 1932 is a major component of the proposed heritage works. As this panel will be mounted in view of the bridge, the secondary theme will be the bridge itself. Topics to be briefly addressed will be; the role of the bridge as the final link in completing the railway; significant engineering features of the bridge (derived from Statement of Significance) and the bridge as an icon for the community.

Tertiary theme (social/personal): It is always good to add a personal theme to a story addressed to the public. In the case of the building of the bridge, it is proposed to introduce the principal bridge designer, J. W. Roberts and his achievements. If possible, credits to the design and building teams may also be added.

Graphics: Map: It is proposed to include a map (possibly historical) showing the route of the Railway Link to illustrate the primary theme. This could be artistically added as a background to the panel.

Images: Ideally a diagram or photo(s) of significant aspect(s) of the bridge can be selected to illustrate the secondary theme. The historical research has uncovered many possible images for this theme.

Portraits: The historical research has uncovered a suitable photo of the bridge designer to add a personal touch to the tertiary theme. It is a family photo and permission will need to be obtained. In addition, several photos have come to light of the opening ceremony of the railway, at which Governor-General Sir Isaac Isaacs officiated.

Location of the Interpretation Panel and Heritage MarkerThe panel will be located in close proximity to the Clarence River Bridge at Grafton. Good interpretation policy suggests that the sign be placed at a view point for the heritage works; preferably allowing readers of the interpretation to be able to see the item, or the detail being described by looking up.


18

The HR Guide suggests that the heritage marker is, preferably, to be placed on the works, out of reach of damage. It should also be visible and as close as possible to the panel. If this is not possible, then an image of the heritage marker can be added to the interpretation content.

An initial study of the possibilities for placement of the heritage marker and the panel has already been carried out, and a suggested area for location is shown in the attached photos.

Manufacture

Quotations for the panel will be called from three manufacturers whom are known to have produced signs of the appropriate quality. A preferred tenderer will be selected from the responses on the basis of price, quality, service and estimate of the cost for replacement of damaged panel surface.

Funding

An estimate for the cost of the interpretation panel at Grafton is $2,000 – $2,500.

EHA(N) will provide volunteer and in-house design resources for the above processes and actions in order to reduce this cost to a minimum (of mainly manufacturing costs).

In his letter of acceptance of the invitation issued to the ARTC to support the HR event (copy attached), CEO David Marchant agreed to “…contribute towards the cost of the interpretation panels” in accordance with EHA’s HR Guide.

Chairman EHA(N)

March 2009

Proposed site under Grafton Bridge for HR Ceremony and Marker/Panel

Marker proposed to be located on pier marked, with the Panel opposite & left.


19

APPENDIX F: PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES FOR DESIGN OF INTERPRETATION PANELSNOTE: Web addresses correct as November 2012

Interpretation Australia Association – Guidelines for Interpretation

The professional association for interpretation in Australia. Contains many resources:

http://www.interpretationaustralia.asn.au/resources/guidelines

NSW Heritage Office

Guidelines: Interpreting Heritage Places and Items. Lawson, E. and Walker, M. (2005)

Online Interpretation media, including activities and events, signs, publications, audio, video, artworks and trails, can enhance understanding and enjoyment by appealing to different levels of experience and knowledge, as well as to different learning styles.

http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/heritagebranch/heritage/NSWHeritageOfficeGuidelinesinfointerpreting.pdf

ENAMELTEC Information for Designers: http://www.pgbell.com/Library/Information for Designers.pdf

Porcelain Enamel Signs: http://www.pgbell.com/etbenefits.html

NSW Heritage Office - Heritage Interpretation Policy

http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/heritagebranch/heritage/interpretationpolicy.pdf

Interpretation Australia Association (IAA) Document references for heritage interpretation

http://www.interpretationaustralia.asn.au/resources/sample-documents

Queensland Heritage Trails Network 2001

Interpretive Signage, Signage Guidelines, Print Applications: http://www.heritagetrails.qld.gov.au/pubs_style.html &

http://www.heritagetrails.qld.gov.au/pdfs/interpretive_signage.pdf

Scottish Tourism and Environment Initiative, Inverness (no ISBN Available)

Carter, J. (ed.) (1997) A Sense of Place – an interpretive planning handbook.

Section 7.4 advises how to design Outdoor Interpretation Panels

Download the manual in PDF form: http://www.greentourism.org.uk/SOFP.PDF.

Australian Heritage Commission and CRC for Sustainable Tourism (2001)

Successful Tourism at Heritage Places:

A guide for tourism operators, heritage managers and communities:

http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/ahc/publications/commission/books/pubs/successful-tourism.pdf

Scottish Natural Heritage Interpretation Resources offers guidelines for:

• interpretive planning;

• writing effective interpretation;






http://www.pgbell.com/Library/Information for Designers.pdf

http://www.pgbell.com/etspec8.html

http://www.pgbell.com/etspec8.html

http://www.pgbell.com/etbenefits.html



http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/heritagebranch/heritage/interpretationpolicy.pdf

http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/docs/interpretationpolicy.pdf

http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/docs/interpretationpolicy.pdf




http://www.heritagetrails.qld.gov.au/pubs_style.html






http://www.greentourism.org.uk/SOFP.PDF

http://www.scotinterpnet.org.uk/

http://www.scotinterpnet.org.uk/

http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/ahc/publications/commission/books/pubs/successful-tourism.pdf

http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/ahc/publications

http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/ahc/publications


20

• producing interpretive panels;

• making interpretation accessible for all;

• evaluating interpretation;

• good practice guidelines.

http://www.snh.gov.uk/policy-and-guidance/heritage-interpretation

Department of Conservation, NZ. Te Papa Atawahai. Interpretation Handbook and Standard:

Distilling the Essence:

http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/about-doc/role/policies-and-plans/interpretation-handbook-complete.pdf

US National Parks Service Interpretation Training Materials:

http://idp.eppley.org/

ANZECC Report National Park and Protected Area Management DNRE 1999.

Best Practice in Park Interpretation and Education:

http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/publications/best-practice/interpretation-education.html

Tourism Tasmania’s Guide to Interpretation practice, with emphasis given to the planning and use of themes; developed in May 2005:

“Tasmanian Thematic Interpretation Planning Manual”

Prepared by Professor Sam M Ham, Anna Housego & Professor Betty Weiler:

http://www.tourismtasmania.com.au/publications/thematic_interpretation_manual

List of Australian Vitreous Enamel signage manufacturers

http://www.glassmetal.com.au/http://www.vitrasignage.com.au/http://www.compacmarketing.com.au/

http://www.snh.gov.uk/policy-and-guidance/heritage-interpretation/

http://www.snh.org.uk/wwo/Interpretation/default.html







http://idp.eppley.org/

http://www.nps.gov/idp/interp/

http://www.nps.gov/idp/interp/


http://www.environment.gov.au/parks

http://www.environment.gov.au/parks




http://www.glassmetal.com.au/

http://www.glassmetal.com.au/

http://www.vitrasignage.com.au/

http://www.vitrasignage.com.au/

http://www.compacmarketing.com.au/




21

APPENDIX G: NOTES FOR CEREMONY ORGANISERS

Ceremony Organising Committee

Ceremonies are generally hosted by the owner of the work and organised by them in consultation with a nominated person from the relevant engineering heritage group. For larger ceremonies it is recommended that a special committee of stakeholders be set up. A specific person should be appointed as the owner’s representative. Consultation can generally be handled by telephone and email, supplemented by visitation if necessary.

Ceremony organisation and location

A mutually convenient date should be chosen having regard to availability of important participants and the ability to hold the ceremony in conjunction with a special event such as the Heritage Festival/Week, National Engineering Week, an anniversary or an Engineers Australia event such as a conference. Weekends are preferable as they allow increased participation by working people.

The ceremony should be held as near as practicable to the work receiving the Heritage Award. Where a Marker cannot be unveiled in its final position a suitable temporary stand may be used and the Marker later fixed in its permanent place.

Outdoor venues are appropriate for most occasions, but an alternative should be available in the event of inclement weather. Consideration should be given to:

• a platform for the speakers or the main party; • a lectern that can hold speech notes in place; • a good reliable PA system with operator; • an unveiling stand and its reliability of operation; • seating for the guests and speakers; and• the display of banners of Engineers Australia and the owner.

Note, it has been Engineers Australia’s long–standing practice that only the marker and its accompanying interpretation panel be unveiled at the ceremony. If the identities of the unveiling personnel are important in the history of the work, then it may be appropriate to include a name or names within the panel text. Requests for a separate plaque containing the name of an unveiling dignitary would not normally be considered.

Invitations

As appropriate and depending on the significance of the award, invitees might be selected from the following:

Engineers Australia: National President, Chief Executive and senior office bearers both national and divisional of Engineers Australia. Board of EHA and members of local and nearby Engineering Heritage groups;

Vice Regal: Governor General or State Governor (if they are performing the unveiling);

Politicians: Prime Minister, Premier and Minister (if they are performing the unveiling), and local Members both Federal and State;

Owner of work: Representatives;

Heritage & history organisations: Representatives of Australian Heritage Council, State Heritage Council, National Trust, local historical and museum societies etc;

Local schools & youth organisations: School children and staff, scouts, girl guides etc.

Media & Engineers Australia magazine

Matters of protocol and other sensitivities need to be considered as they may affect attendances and the make-up of the official party. There should be prior personal communication with dignitaries who will not be asked to speak or participate in the formalities.

Invitations are generally issued by the owner around one month ahead. The engineering heritage group should supply a list of its invitees to add to the owner’s list. A deadline for RSVPs should be set for catering purposes.

Ceremony brochure

A tastefully designed brochure, containing basic information about the work including material from the Interpretation Panel and explaining the significance of the event, should be provided. A folded A4 sheet of reasonable quality that could serve as a souvenir may be adequate. The owner’s representative should be encouraged to either produce the


22

brochure or play a major role in its production. Some owners have regarded the event as of such importance they have produced coloured booklets.

Ceremony Proceedings

A ceremony program should be provided and should include the names of important guests and those who are to officiate.

Guests should be welcomed and receive a copy of the program and ceremony brochure (often combined). The formal ceremony should not normally exceed 30-40 minutes.

A typical program could be:

Welcome to guests and purpose of event 5 minutesHistorical information about the work including a brief description of the award program

10 minutes

Presentation and unveiling of the marker 10 minutes

Owner receiving the marker

3 minutes

Closing remarks

2 minutes

Official photographs

5 minutes

The presentation of the marker is performed by the Engineers Australia’s representative. They will also perform the unveiling, with the owner’s representative and other VIPs usually invited to assist. However, when a VIP has been invited for the purpose (such as the Governor), the VIP will perform the unveiling.

Visual displays are appreciated and can provide additional information about the work.

Tours of the awarded work are welcomed and are often appropriate.

The owner usually provides refreshments such as a morning or afternoon tea.

Photography: The heritage group should ensure ceremony photographs are taken as a record and for later publicity purposes.

Publicity

The owner should be encouraged to seek media coverage. The heritage group should provide or assist with press releases. It should also provide articles for the Engineers Australia magazine and the EHA newsletter.

Ceremony Report

It is desirable to make a brief report of the event as evidence of EHA’s community involvement and as an example for first-time ceremony organisers. The report could include photographs, copies of programs, brochures and media articles, texts of the speeches and a list of dignitaries.

A statement confirming the responsibility for the future maintenance of the Interpretation Panel should be included.

One hard copy should be sent to the Divisional EHA group, one to the owner and one to the EA National Office. In addition, as much as possible of the report should be in electronic form, and an electronic copy should be sent to National Office for ease of distribution.


23

APPENDIX H: RECOGNITION OF HERITAGE COLLECTIONSMuseum or other collections containing significant engineering heritage items may be considered for awarding of either an EHNL or EHM.

The award may be made on the basis of a significant engineering collection in a museum, theme park, society collection, private collection or any other grouping of engineering heritage artefacts.

The collection:

• could consist of any number of items;• may include items derived from or manufactured overseas; • may be housed indoors or outdoors;• may be a group of artefacts on a single theme or multiple themes; • need not be housed in a heritage building;• may consist of only one item (or a small group of items) of engineering heritage significance

housed within a collection of non-engineering heritage items.In assessing an award, it must be recognised that individual items within a collection may change over time.

The procedures for nomination, assessment, selection of the of award category and the recognition ceremony are the same as for other EHNL and EHM Awards as described in this Guide, except that the word “collection” should preferably appear in the Statement of Significance, and the wording of the Statement of Significance should explain the “theme” of the collection recognised by the award. A further exception is the need to obtain formal agreement of the owner(s) of the collection that if some of the items are subsequently disposed of, then EHA may withdraw the Marker. This should occur earlier in the procedure rather than later.

The nomination should list at least the most significant engineering heritage items in the collection but need not list the items exhaustively. The documentation may provide information on the provenance of all or some of the items in the collection.

At the time of the Heritage Award Ceremony, a letter should be provided to the owners of the collection listing the main items in the collection and confirming the prior agreement regarding any disposal of the main items. Periodic inspections of awarded collections should be made to ensure they are still intact and generally in accordance with the text of the panel. Any significant changes to the collection should be recorded.

APPENDIX I: ENGINEERING HERITAGE AUSTRALIA - CONTACT DETAILSThe address for sending Proposals, Nominations or for enquiries about this program is:

Administrator

Engineering Heritage Australia

Engineers Australia

Engineering House

11 National Circuit

BARTON ACT 2600

Tel: (02) 6270 6584

Fax: (02) 6273 2358


24

APPENDIX J: MARKERS - FIXING, CARE, OWNERSHIP & REMOVAL

Fixing of Markers

Fixing should be as permanent as possible in order to prevent damage. The method of fixing will vary due to site differences, but the following experience may be of assistance.

Markers are provided with threaded rods on the rear surface which can be embedded in stone or concrete or bolted to a steel stand.

Markers should end up hard against the mounting surface to make them less vulnerable to being prised off.

Where Markers are to be mounted such that the heads of the screws or bolts are exposed, measures should be employed to ensure the screws/bolts cannot be undone and the plaque removed.

Where Markers are attached to stone or concrete a flat surface should be prepared. The best option is to rebate the surface so that the marker can be inset flush and tight with its surrounds.

Care of Markers

Treat and clean as you would for any vitreous enamelled plate or pot. The design is very resistant to moisture, sunlight, corrosion, chemicals and solvents, but the enamel surface may be damaged by forceful impact with a hard, sharp object.

Guidelines for the continuing care of the older bronze markers can be obtained for Engineering Heritage Australia.

Ownership and Removal of Markers

Markers remain the property of Engineers Australia unless agreed otherwise in writing. If the work or collection has materially changed and, as a consequence, the award is no longer valid, EHA reserves the right to withdraw the marker.


25

APPENDIX K: CHANGE IN TERMINOLOGY:

New Name (from 2011/12) Previous name

Heritage Recognition Program Australian Historic Engineering Plaquing Program

Heritage Recognition Committee Plaquing Committee

Guide to the Heritage Recognition Program Guide to the Australian Historic Engineering Plaquing Program

Engineering Heritage National Marker National Engineering Landmark, Engineering Heritage National landmark

Engineering Heritage Marker Historic Engineering Marker

Engineering Heritage International Marker (No equivalent)

Interpretation Panel Interpretive Sign

Heritage Award Nomination Plaque Nomination

Statement of Significance Statement of Significance

Heritage Award Plaque

Heritage Recognition Ceremony Plaquing Ceremony

Divisional EHA group Titles vary among Divisions

Register of Engineering Heritage Markers Register of Historic Engineering Plaques


26


27

APPENDIX L: DRAWINGS FOR INTERPRETATION PANEL MOUNT(Suitable for most situtaions where typical panel and disk are to be mounted on the ground)

guide to to engineering heritage recognition program prepared by engineering heritage australia a...

Documents