growth prediction (amount, direction and spurt) with relevance to orthodontics by almuzian
TRANSCRIPT
Growth prediction (amount, spurt and direction)
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
Adolescence is the transitional period between the juvenile stage and adulthood, during which secondary sexual characteristics appear, the adolescent growth spurt takes place, fertility is attained, and profound physiologic changes occur.
Methods of prediction of the onset of the pubertal growth spurt
How can we determine growth in a population?
Longitudinal studies – take a long time
Cross sectional studies – measure boys and girls at one time and all ages
Mixed longitudinal and cross sectional follow groups over time i.e. 3-4 years
Timing of PGS varies between individuals, on average 2 years earlier in girls than boys
Tanner & Davies 1985. Average timing of onset of PGS is 14 +/- 2(boys) & 12 +/- 2 (girls)
Tanner 1976. PGS lasts 3½ years in boys & 2 years in girls, with PHV occurring in the
middle. While profit 2000 mentioned that the estimated the PHV to be 13.5 +/- 0.9 yrs for
boys and 11.5 +/- 0.9 yrs for girls. He states that puberty lasts about 5years in boys compared
to 3.5 years in girls. Considerable variation occurs due to:
1) Genetic factors - early/late maturing families, ethnic and racial variation.
2) Environmental factors - seasonal factors (spring, summer)
3) Cultural factors - City children
4) Seasonal factors
5) Juvenile acceleration - Occurs mainly in girls and growth starts 1-2 years before puberty.
This growth can equal or exceed that of puberty.
Methods prediction of growth timing and variability
A. Methods prediction of growth variability
1. Growth chart to assess growth variability:
An individual who stood exactly at the midpoint of the normal
distribution would fall along the 50%line of the graph. One who
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
was larger than 90%of the population would plot above the 90%line; one who was
smaller than 90%of the population would plot below the 10%line.
These charts can be used in two ways to determine whether growth is normal or
abnormal.
First, the location of an individual relative to the group can be established. A general
guideline is that a child who falls outside the range of 97%of the population should
receive special attention.
Second and perhaps more importantly, growth charts can be used to follow a child
over time to evaluate whether there is an unexpected change in growth pattern.
When is further growth assessment required? If any of the following apply:
I. Height, Weight or BMI is a 0.4th centile
II. Height centile > 3 centile spaces below the mid-parental centile
III. Drop in height centile position of more than 2 centile spaces
IV. Any other concerns about the child’s growth.
A. UK-WHO growth charts
Based on (WHO) Child Growth Standards
Describe the optimal growth for
healthy, breastfed children.
Combine UK90 4-18 yrs and WHO
data 2-4yrs
Therefore covers ages 2 to 18
Technique:
Tadiometer
Shoes off
Heels, bottom back of head
Frankfort Plane Horizontal
Breathe in & then out
Measure to nearest mm
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
Plot on chart which could be:
B. Tanner – Whitehouse:
Plot height directly but it is now considered as old since 1960 and there
is a Secular trend for increasing height.
B. Methods prediction of growth timing
2. Physical changes
3. Chronological age: Poor predictor as considerable variation in timing of adolesence.
However, Perinetti 2014 showed that this method is not worse than CVM in predicting the
growth and it could be reliable.
4. Dental Age: Poorly correlated with growth.
5. Secondary sexual characteristic features:
Adolescence in girl can be divided into three stages, based on the extent of sexual development. The first stage, which occurs at about the beginning of the physical growth spurt, is the appearance of breast buds and early stages of the development of pubic hair.The peak velocity for physical growth occurs about 1 year after the initiation of stage I, and coincides with stage II of development of sexual characteristics. At this time, there is noticeable breast development. Pubic hair is darker and more widespread, and hair appears in the armpits (axillary hair). The third stage in girls occurs 1 to years after stage II and is marked by the onset of menstruation. By this time, the growth spurt is all but complete. At this stage, there is noticeable broadening of the hips with more adult fat distribution, and development of the breasts is complete.In boys, four stages in development can be correlated with the curve of general body growth at adolescence. The initial sign of sexual maturation in boys usually is the “fat spurt.” The maturing boy gains weight and becomes almost chubby, with a somewhat feminine fat distribution. At stage II, about 1 year after stage I, the spurt in height is just beginning. At this stage, there is a redistribution and relative decrease in subcutaneous fat, pubic hair begins to appear, and growth of the penis begins. The third stage occurs 8 to 12 months after stage II and coincides with the peak velocity in gain in height. At this time, axillary hair appears and facial hair appears on the upper lip only. Stage IV for boys, which occurs anywhere from 15 to 24 months after stage III, is difficult to pinpoint. At this time, the spurt of growth in height ends. There is facial hair on the chin and the upper lip, adult distribution and color of pubic and axillary hair, and a further increase in muscular strength
C. Height/Weight ratios and height
Itself is not highly correlated with facial growth (Tanner and Whitehouse 1976).
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
D. Peak Height Velocity (PHV)
It came from the data of de Montbeillard (1720-
1785)
Developed by Tanner & Whitehouse 1966 who rely
on the data of Harpenden Growth Study 1950s that
involve measurements of height on 49 boys and 41
girls.
It involves Ploting change in height on a chart and it
is more useful but with Secular trend less
Growth spurt on average begins 1 year before PHV (probably the best available method).
It shows three general phases in the growth curve:
• A rapid rate of growth at birth, which progressively decelerates until around 3 years of age;
• A slowly decelerating phase, which persists until the adolescent growth spurt in the early
teenage years and is interrupted by a brief juvenile growth spurt at around 6 to 8 years; and
• An adolescent growth spurt, which is followed by a progressive deceleration in growth
velocity until adulthood.
Sullivan 1983 method based on standard growth velocity charts (Tanner 1966), measuring
standing height at 4 monthly intervals from age 9, transparent template to estimate when
growth is about to accelerate. Method found to be acceptably accurate, but more accurate in
boys than girls
6. Cephalometric standared like Bolton norms
7. Hand Wrist Radiographs:
Ossifying Events - these are correlated fairly well with PHV but variation is too wide to be of
predictive value (Gruelich and Pyle, 1959). It is more retrospective technique for growth
prediction. Grave & Brown 1979 described skeletal indicators (such as ossification of the
ulnar sesamoid) to assess maturity. Gruelich & Pyle 1959 method involving comparison of
films to standard atlas to assess bone staging.
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
Houston 1979 - single ossification events not sufficiently accurate to be useful for prediction
- based on this, Isaacson & Thom 2001 BOS guideline do not recommend the use of the
method.
However, Flores-Mir 2004 systematic review concluded that hand-wrist films are useful for
assessment of skeletal maturity in carefully selected cases, using method of Gruelich & Pyle
rather than single ossification event.
However, additional radiation exposure, limited accuracy. Indications in routine clinical
orthodontics very limited.
8. CVM
Appearance of cervical vertebrae on lateral ceph to assess skeletal maturation (Franchi
2000). First proposed – Lamparski 1972
However, Hunter 2007 has shown poor correlation between skeletal age and peak mandibular
velocity (PmdV), and therefore CVM (or hand-wrist films) may not be a useful predictor of
growth of jaws.
Simplified method described by Baccetti 2002. Bacetti et al. 2005 used longitudinal data and
related it to annual change in Co-Gn
- 5 stages of development, based on morphology of C2, C3 and C4. PHV between CVM II
and CVM III. Advantage - no additional x-ray exposure. Method useful in anticipating the
growth spurt, and establishing whether PHV has occurred.
CVMS 1: The lower borders of C2, C3 and C4 are flat. The bodies of both C3 and C4 are
trapezoid in shape. The peak in mandibular growth (PMnG) will occur on average
2yrs after this stage
CVMS 2: C2 lower border is now concave. C2 and C3 are still trapezoid in shape. The
PMnG will occur on average 1yr after this stageMohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
CVMS 3: The lower border of C2 and C3 are concave. The bodies of C3 and C4 may
be either trapezoid or rectangular horizontal in shape. The PMnG will occur during this
stage
CVMS 4: C2, C3 and C4 lower borders are concave. Both C3 and C4 are rectangular -
horizontal in shape. PMnG has occurred within 1 or 2yrs before this stage
CVMS 5: At least one of the bodies of C3 and C4 is squared in shape. The PMnG has
ended at least 1yr before this stage
CVMS 6: At least on of the bodies of C3 and C4 is rectangular - vertical is shape. PMnG
has ended at least 2yrs before this age
progression from one cervical vertebral stage to another does not occur annually
the time spent in each stage varies, on average, from 1.5 to 4.2yrs depending on the stage.
Peak mand growth:
I. 2 yrs after CVMS1
II. 1 yr after CVMS2
III. During this year – CVMS3
IV. Occurred within 1 to 2 yrs - CVMS4
V. Ended at least 1yr ago – CVMS5
VI. Ended 2 yrs ago – CVMS6
9. Scammon curve
During puberty the growth velocity curve rises to a maximum and then begins to fall again.
The maximum rate of growth is the peak height velocity (PHV).
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
Growth curves for the maxilla and mandible shown against Scammon's curves. The growth of
the jaws is intermediate between the neural and general body curves. Growth in height does
correlate with growth of the jaws.
Clinical relevance of growth in orthodontic
1. Growth rotations and its influence on malocclusion
a) Posterior rotation
Patient develop increase anterior vertical face height
Patient develop increase lower incisor crowding
Difficult to maintain a positive OB as OB reduces with growth - may progress to a Sk AOB
and progressively retrusive chin. So treatment should be delayed to adulthood
Bite opening mechanics should be avoided,
Lower incisors should not be proclined beyond normal values.
It may need for Xtns for arch levelling
b) Anterior rotation
OB deepens with growth rotation and is difficult to reduce, developing deep OB and CI 11/2
incisal relationship may need a bite plane to prevent the OB reduction. So treatment should
be started as early as possible
May mask any slight maxillary AP growth inhibition achieved with HG
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
May develop lower incisor crowding
Slower space closure
Avoid Xtns for arch levelling
2. Influence of growth on treatment
Orthodontic treatment proceeds more quickly if carried out during active growth. Therefore,
the most favourable time for treatment is during PGS. Stephens & Houston 1985 noted that
growth during treatment facilitates:
i. OB reduction
ii. distal movement of posterior teeth
iii. space closure
iv. occlusal settling
v. functional appliance treatment
vi. use of RME
vii. Unlocking the occlusion during the growth spurt allow the correction to be
expressed at dental level when the skeletal relationship change. As O Brien mentioned in 2003 the
controlled gp showed favourable growth of their mandible however their OJ stayed almost the
same and this because the occlusal interlocking prevent the correction to occur.
3. Growth modification
In a growing patient, some modification of growth pattern is possible. Treatment such as
functional appliances (Tulloch 1998), HG (Mills 1978), protraction (Ngan 1997) and RME
(Wertz 1977) are all most effective during rapid growth.
4. Prognosis
In skeletal II or III cases, subsequent growth may tend to either improve or worsen the skeletal
pattern. Prediction of growth pattern may allow accurate assessment of whether a CIII
malocclusion may be treated orthodontically, or if later surgical treatment will be necessary, or
whether growth is likely to facilitate correction of SkII or if ortho treatment should aim to
camouflage skeletal pattern.
5. Retention & stability.
Growth continuing after orthodontic treatment may contribute to relapse, particularly in cases
where the malocclusion resulted from the growth pattern (Nanda 1992).
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
If occlusion well interdigitated, dentoalveolar compensation maintains occlusion, but where
capacity exceeded, relapse may occur Houston 1972
Late lower incisor crowding may occur as a result of long-term growth changes.
6. Orthognathic surgery.
Where surgery is planned, it is nb to ensure facial growth is complete, to avoid relapse caused
by subsequent growth.
Methods for Studying Bone GrowthTypes of growth studies
Longitudinal Cross sectional Mixed
A. Quantitative method:1. Direct Craniometry Anthropometry1. Indierect method:
Skeletal maturation or Comparative Anatomy like hand wrist and cvm Cephalometric analysis 3-D imaging via computed tomography (CT) or MRI, but it still can be helpful to use
implants to provide landmarks for superimposition Study model Photograph B. Experimental study
Vital Staining
Radioactive tracers and Technium 99
Implant Radiography: This method of study was developed by Professor Arne Björk
and coworkers at the Royal Dental College in Copenhagen, Denmark, and was used
extensively by workers there (see Chapter 4). It provided important new information
about the growth pattern of the jaws. Before radiographic studies using implants, the
extent of remodeling changes in the contours of the jaw bones was underestimated, and
the rotational pattern of jaw growth described in Chapter 4 was not appreciated.
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow
Genetic study (Msx1 is the controlling gene for jaws)
The growth studies are Burlington (canada) , Broadbent (ohaio) and Iowa growth studie and it is consist of ceph and sm
These studies helped to understand the growth and develop slandered and template, growth direction , prediction of mandible growth peak growth by CVM and hand wrist
Mohammed Almuzian, 2014, University of Glasgow