groundwater salinity within the mt. simon sandstone in ...simon. the elmhurst sandstone is...
TRANSCRIPT
Circular 582 2014
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prairie Research InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Groundwater Salinity Within the Mt. Simon Sandstone in Illinois and IndianaEdward Mehnert and Paula H. Weberling
© 2014 University of Illinois Board of Trustees. All rights reserved. For permissions information, contact the Illinois State Geological Survey.
Front Cover: Contour map of the data from the Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (2005) salinity map using point kriging with no search radius and a grid spacing of 250 m.
Circular 582 2014
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEYPrairie Research InstituteUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign615 E. Peabody DriveChampaign, Illinois 61820-6918http://www.isgs.illinois.edu
Groundwater Salinity Within the Mt. Simon Sandstone in Illinois and IndianaEdward Mehnert and Paula H. Weberling
CONTENTS
Abstract 1
Background 1
Compilation of Salinity Data 2
Contour Map Development 6
Acknowledgments 11
References 12
Appendix 13
A1 List of total dissolved solids (TDS) data used in this report 13
List of Tables 1 Distribution of the 329 compiled brine samples by location 6 2 Sources for brine samples by contributing institution 6
List of Figures 1 Map of potential waste disposal reservoirs (from Bergstrom 1968) 1 2 Salinity in the Elmhurst-Mt. Simon Sandstone in northern Illinois (from Visocky et al. 1985) 2 3 Map showing the 10,000 mg/L total dissolved solids (TDS) line in several formations, including the Elmhurst-Mt. Simon Sandstone (from Brower et al. 1989) 3 4 Salinity map for brine within the Mt. Simon Sandstone in northern Illinois (from Morse and Leetaru 2005) 4 5 Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) map of total dissolved solids (TDS, mg/L) in the groundwater from the Mt. Simon Sandstone (from MGSC 2005) 5 6 Histograms comparing the total dissolved solids (TDS) distributions for all 329 data points (top), for the 169 data points used for the contour map (middle), and for the original data set of the 2005 Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium map (bottom) 7 7 (a) Contour map of the updated data set using point kriging with no search radius and a grid spacing of 250 m. (b) New contour map of the data from the Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (2005) salinity map using point kriging with no search radius and a grid spacing of 250 m 8 8 Filled contour map of 169 data points (orange circles) for groundwater salinity in the Mt. Simon Sandstone, where salinity is quantified by total dissolved solids 9 9 Location of the 10,000 mg/L total dissolved solids (TDS) line for groundwater in the Mt. Simon Sandstone for this study and from four published maps 10 10 Bubble chart of the groundwater salinity in the Mt. Simon Sandstone based on 329 total dissolved solids (TDS) data points 11
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 1
AbstractIn the Cambrian-age Mt. Simon Sand-stone, salinity varies widely from less than 1,000 mg/L of total dissolved solids (TDS) in northern Illinois to more than 250,000 mg/L of TDS in southern Illi-nois. Salinity is an important character-istic of groundwater and is quantified by measuring the TDS. With recent interest in geologic carbon sequestration, new wells have been completed in the Mt. Simon and new TDS data have been col-lected. These new TDS data, along with other available data from Illinois and Indiana wells, were compiled and plot-ted to generate an updated map of salin-ity in the Mt. Simon Sandstone.
BackgroundThe Mt. Simon Sandstone is the basal sandstone in the Illinois Basin and is considered a saline reservoir well suited for geologic carbon sequestration (U.S. Department of Energy 2012). For geo-logic carbon sequestration, salinity is an important consideration because it pro-vides an indication of the brine density and it affects carbon dioxide solubility in brine (e.g., Pruess and Garcia 2002). Salinity data are also vital as input data for simulations that evaluate the poten-tial effects of geologic carbon sequestra-tion in the Mt. Simon (e.g., Zhou et al. 2010; Adams 2013; Mehnert et al. 2013). Thus, Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) researchers sought to improve on the available salinity maps for the Mt. Simon and develop a new map incor-porating data from new wells and over-looked available data.
Salinity is a measure of the saltiness of water or soil. For groundwater, salin-ity is typically quantified by measuring total dissolved solids (TDS). Several TDS values are significant. Total dis-solved solids values for fresh ground-water are less than 1,000 mg/L, whereas TDS values for saline groundwater exceed 1,000 mg/L (Barlow 2003). For comparison, seawater typically has a TDS value of 35,000 mg/L (Stumm and Morgan 1996). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) defines an underground source of drinking water as any water supply with less than 10,000 mg/L of TDS. Water supplies that exceed 10,000 mg/L of TDS are generally con-
sidered unsuitable for a drinking water source because treatment costs would be prohibitive. In this report, brine is used to define groundwater with TDS values exceeding 10,000 mg/L. Given the significance of the 10,000 mg/L TDS line for water supply purposes, this line is included in the new salinity map.
Meents et al. (1952) published brine data and produced contour maps of TDS in several oil-producing formations in the Illinois Basin. The deepest formation they studied was the Ordovician St. Peter Sandstone. Mapping water quality is also important for water supply and groundwater protection purposes. In
southern Wisconsin, the Cambrian-age Mt. Simon is considered a freshwater aquifer (SEWRPC 2002). While evaluat-ing the feasibility of industrial waste disposal, Bergstrom (1968) mapped the TDS in the Mt. Simon and the Cam-brian-age Ironton-Galesville Sandstones (Figure 1). For an assessment of ground-water resources, Visocky et al. (1985) mapped TDS in the Elmhurst-Mt. Simon aquifer in northern Illinois (Figure 2). The Elmhurst Sandstone is the basal member of the Cambrian-age Eau Claire Formation, which overlies the Mt. Simon. The Elmhurst Sandstone is dif-ficult to distinguish from the Mt. Simon,
Figure 1 Map of potential waste disposal reservoirs (from Bergstrom 1968). South of the Mt. Simon and Galesville lines, these reservoirs were found to contain brine with total dissolved minerals in excess of 10,000 parts per million, which is equiva-lent to total dissolved solids of 10,000 mg/L.
JO DAVIESS STEPHENSON WINNEBAGO BOONE MC HENRY
CARROLL OGLEDE KALB
LEEWHITESIDE
LAKE
KANE COOK
DU PAGE
KENDALL WILL
GRUNDY
LA SALLE
BUREAU
KANKAKEE
LIVINGSTONMARSHALL
PUTNAM
STARK
PEORIA IROQUOIS
FORD
MC LEAN
TAZEWELL
WOODFORD
MASON
DEWITT
CHAMPAIGN
PIATT
LOGAN
MACON
CHRISTIAN
SHELBY
MOULTRIE
DOUGLAS
COLES
CUMBERLAND
FAYETTEEFFINGHAM
BOND
CLINTON
MARION
CLAY
JASPER
RICHLAND
WAYNE
JEFFERSONWASHINGTON
MADISON
ST. CLAIR
MONROE
RANDOLPH PERRY
FRANKLIN
HAMILTON
JACKSON
WILLIAMSONSALINE
WHITE
GALLATIN
UNION JOHNSON POPE HARDIN
MASSACPULASKI
HENRY
KNOX
MERCER
WARREN
ROCK ISLAND
HANCOCK MC DONOUGHFULTON
SCHUYLERADAMS
BROWN
CASS
MORGAN SANGAMONPIKE
SCOTT
GREENE MACOUPIN
MONTGOMERY
JERSEY
VERMILION
EDGAR
CLARK
CRAWFORDLAWRENCE
MENARD
CALHO
UN
ALEXANDER
EDW
ARD
S WABASH
HEND
ERSO
N
Deeper Pennsylvanian and older rocks
Devonian-Silurian and older rocks
Cambrian rocks
Mt. Simon Sandstone
Disposal not feasible or limitedto lower Mt. Simon
POSSIBLE DISPOSAL RESERVOIRS
St. Peter
Ironton-Galesville
Mt. Simon U = Upper; L = Lower
Waste disposal well
Gas storage project
Other well
3
11
85
TOTAL DISSOLVED MINERALSIN DEEP SANDSTONES(to the nearest thousandparts per million)
0 40 mi
0 60 kmN
89–95L
102–128
67L
1.2U2U
.3
33
812 19
25
8
9
562L11
.6
1.53.8–6.6
1.4–3.3
10–25
1.7 47–51 2.21.6
2.2
1.8
1.3
388–175
3.5
205199
4
33 35
1.6–385
21
212
98
106
263
MT.
SIM
ON
GAL
ESVI
LLE
2 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
so the two units are considered a single hydrogeologic unit or aquifer. Visocky et al. (1985) noted that shale interbeds separated water higher in TDS in the deeper Mt. Simon from the lower TDS groundwater in the shallower Elmhurst-Mt. Simon. Brower et al. (1989) reviewed TDS in several formations, including the Elmhurst-Mt. Simon, and produced a statewide map showing the 10,000 mg/L TDS line in several formations (Figure
3). For northern Illinois, Morse and Leetaru (2005) published a map of the salinity in the Mt. Simon (Figure 4). The Midwest Geologic Sequestration Con-sortium (MGSC) published a map with an expanded geographic range showing the groundwater salinity within the Mt. Simon Sandstone in and near the Illi-nois Basin (Figure 5). Unlike most other maps, this map did not include a 10,000 mg/L contour.
Compilation of Salinity DataPublished salinity maps of the Mt. Simon Sandstone were developed with relatively few data points. For his state-wide map of the Mt. Simon, Bergstrom (1968) plotted 14 TDS values, whereas Visocky et al. (1985) apparently devel-oped their map of northern Illinois using fewer than 10 TDS samples. Brower et al.
JO DAVIESS STEPHENSON WINNEBAGO BOONE MC HENRY
CARROLL OGLEDE KALB
LEEWHITESIDE
LAKE
KANE COOK
DU PAGE
KENDALL WILL
GRUNDY
LA SALLE
BUREAU
KANKAKEE
LIVINGSTONMARSHALL
PUTNAM
STARK
PEORIA IROQUOIS
FORD
MC LEAN
TAZEWELL
WOODFORD
MASON
DEWITT
CHAMPAIGN
PIATT
LOGAN
MACON
CHRISTIAN
SHELBY
MOULTRIE
DOUGLAS
COLES
CUMBERLAND
FAYETTEEFFINGHAM
BOND
CLINTON
MARION
CLAY
JASPER
RICHLAND
WAYNE
JEFFERSONWASHINGTON
MADISON
ST. CLAIR
MONROE
RANDOLPH PERRY
FRANKLIN
HAMILTON
JACKSON
WILLIAMSONSALINE
WHITE
GALLATIN
UNION JOHNSON POPE HARDIN
MASSACPULASKI
HENRY
KNOX
MERCER
WARREN
ROCK ISLAND
HANCOCK MC DONOUGHFULTON
SCHUYLERADAMS
BROWN
CASS
MORGAN SANGAMONPIKE
SCOTT
GREENE MACOUPIN
MONTGOMERY
JERSEY
VERMILION
EDGAR
CLARK
CRAWFORDLAWRENCE
MENARD
CALHO
UN
ALEXANDER
EDW
ARD
S WABASH
HEND
ERSO
N
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
5,000
10,000
N0 20 40 60 mi
0 100 km50
Total dissolved solids isocon (mg/L)
Control point
500
Figure 2 Salinity in the Elmhurst-Mt. Simon Sandstone in northern Illinois (from Visocky et al. 1985). This map includes total dissolved solids values up to 10,000 mg/L.
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 3
(1989) did not document their TDS data. The MGSC (2005) map was developed using 57 TDS values from Illinois wells. For this study, 329 TDS values have been compiled from new and existing wells in Illinois and Indiana (Appendix Table A1). The TDS values are reported in units of milligrams per liter and are located using the Universal Transverse Merca-tor (UTM) coordinate system. The UTM coordinates were calculated using an ArcGIS algorithm based on well loca-
tions in the Public Land Survey System (section, township, range). Surfer ver-sion 11 (http://www.GoldenSoftware.com) was used to generate the grids and the contour maps.
Wells that penetrate the Mt. Simon, although rare in Illinois and Indiana, are drilled for structural tests, ground-water supply, natural gas storage, and liquid waste disposal. The majority of the compiled data were collected from
wells in Illinois (302 values), with Indi-ana data accounting for the remaining 27 entries (Table 1). The Illinois data come from 31 different counties and 159 different wells, whereas the Indiana data come from 7 counties and 10 wells. Multiple data points, with different TDS values, were obtained from 45 Illinois wells and 6 Indiana wells. Most of the entries (Table 2) were compiled from water samples collected by natural gas storage companies (e.g., Nicor, Ameren,
?
JO DAVIESS STEPHENSON WINNEBAGO BOONE MC HENRY
CARROLL OGLEDE KALB
LEEWHITESIDE
LAKE
KANE COOK
DU PAGE
KENDALL WILL
GRUNDY
LA SALLE
BUREAU
KANKAKEE
LIVINGSTONMARSHALL
PUTNAM
STARK
PEORIA IROQUOIS
FORD
MC LEAN
TAZEWELL
WOODFORD
MASON
DEWITT
CHAMPAIGN
PIATT
LOGAN
MACON
CHRISTIAN
SHELBY
MOULTRIE
DOUGLAS
COLES
CUMBERLAND
FAYETTEEFFINGHAM
BOND
CLINTON
MARION
CLAY
JASPER
RICHLAND
WAYNE
JEFFERSONWASHINGTON
MADISON
ST. CLAIR
MONROE
RANDOLPH PERRY
FRANKLIN
HAMILTON
JACKSON
WILLIAMSONSALINE
WHITE
GALLATIN
UNION JOHNSON POPE HARDIN
MASSACPULASKI
HENRY
KNOX
MERCER
WARREN
ROCK ISLAND
HANCOCK MC DONOUGHFULTON
SCHUYLERADAMS
BROWN
CASS
MORGAN SANGAMONPIKE
SCOTT
GREENE MACOUPIN
MONTGOMERY
JERSEY
VERMILION
EDGAR
CLARK
CRAWFORDLAWRENCE
MENARD
CALHO
UN
ALEXANDER
EDW
ARD
S WABASH
HEND
ERSO
N
0 20 40 60 mi
0 100 km50N
Potosi
Ironton-Galesville
Elmhurst-Mt. Simon
Isopach interval 100 ft
Southern boundaryof Ironton-Galesville
?
500
Approximate boundariesof 10,000 mg/L of TDS
400
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,00
0
200
300
Figure 3 Map showing the 10,000 mg/L total dissolved solids (TDS) line in several formations, including the Elmhurst-Mt. Simon Sandstone (dashed line; from Brower et al. 1989). Base map shows the thickness (isopach) of the Eau Claire Formation.
4 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.) and industries using Class I injection wells (Allied Chemical and steel com-panies). Illinois and Indiana state insti-tutions (ISGS, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Illinois State Water Survey, and Indiana Geological Survey) also accounted for a large portion of the TDS samples.
Developing a contour map is a two-step process—gridding and contouring. For the gridding process, TDS data from each well must be represented as a single data point. For our TDS data, most wells had a single TDS sample, but some wells had multiple samples. Multiple TDS data arose most commonly from samples being collected from the same
well at different times, but some wells had samples collected from multiple depths. For these wells with multiple TDS values, the well was represented using the median value. The median, rather than the mean, was selected to be the representative value because extreme values have less effect on the median, especially for small samples.
60,000
85,000
0 10
0 10
20 mi
20 kmN
35,0
00
35,000
10,000
10,000
35,0
00
35,0
00
60,0
00
TDS (ppm)
10,000 60,000 110,000
Figure 4 Salinity map for brine within the Mt. Simon Sandstone in northern Illinois (from Morse and Leetaru 2005), which includes total dissolved solids (TDS) contours marking 10,000, 35,000, 60,000, and 85,000 mg/L of TDS.
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 5
The median TDS value was computed using a spreadsheet because the Surfer algorithm for computing medians was incorrect for an even number of data points. For developing the new contour map, we had 169 TDS values.
Histograms show the distributions of all brine data (329 samples), the data used to create the final contour map (169 samples), and the MGSC (2005) map data (Figure 6). The histograms show that the data do not have a normal dis-
tribution and are better described by a log-normal or even multimodal distribu-tion. The histograms also show a wider range of TDS values for the data used in this report than for the 2005 data, but they also display the limited amount of data in the higher TDS ranges, with limited samples between 140,000 and 180,000 mg/L. The histograms also show a tendency for lower TDS values in the 2005 data than in the data used in this report, which is also reflected in the medians. The median TDS value for the
2005 data was 18,978 mg/L, whereas the median was 34,549 mg/L for all brine data and 38,002 mg/L for the brine data used for the contour map.
The TDS samples described in this report were not collected from a single sampling event. They are samples that were collected over a long span of time. Most samples were collected when the well was drilled, but the sampling dates in our database are incomplete. The ear-liest sample was collected in 1911, and
Woodford
Whitley
Webster
Wayne
Washington
Warren
Union
Trimble
Trigg
Todd
Taylor
Spencer
Simpson
Shelby
Scott
Russell
Rockcastle
Robertson
Pulaski
Powell
Pendleton
Owen
Oldham
Ohio
Nicholas
Nelson
Muhlenberg
Montgomery
Monroe
Metcalfe
Mercer
Meade
Mason
Marshall
Marion
Madison
McLean
McCreary
McCrackenLyon
Logan
Livingston
Lincoln
Lee
Laurel
Larue
Knox
Kenton
Jessamine
Jefferson
Jackson
Hopkins
Hickman
Henry
Henderson
Hart
Harrison
Hardin
Hancock
Green
Grayson
Graves
Grant
Garrard
Gallatin
Fulton
Franklin
Fleming
Fayette
Estill
Edmonson
Daviess
Cumberland
Crittenden
Clinton
Clay
Clark
Christian
Casey
Carroll
Carlisle
Campbell
Calloway
Caldwell
Butler
Bullitt
Breckinridge
Bracken
Boyle
Bourbon
Boone
Bell
Bath
Barren
Ballard
Anderson
Allen
Adair
Whitley
White Wells
Wayne
Washington
Warrick
Warren
Wabash
Vigo
Vermillion
Vanderburgh
Union
Tipton
Tippecanoe
Switzerland
Sullivan
Steuben
Starke
Spencer
Shelby
Scott
St. Joseph
Rush
Ripley
Randolph
Putnam
Pulaski
Posey
Porter
Pike
Perry
Parke
Owen
Orange
Ohio
Noble
Newton
Morgan
Montgomery
Monroe
Miami
Martin
Marshall
Marion
Madison
Lawrence
La Porte
Lake
Lagrange
Kosciusko
Knox
Johnson
Jennings
Jefferson
Jay
Jasper
Jackson
Huntington
Howard
Henry
Hendricks
Harrison
Hancock
Hamilton
Greene
Grant
Gibson
Fulton
Franklin
Fountain
Floyd
Fayette
Elkhart
Dubois
Delaware
De Kalb
Decatur
Dearborn
Daviess
Crawford
Clinton
Clay
Clark
Cass
Carroll
Brown
Boone
Blackford
Benton
Bartholomew
Allen
Adams
Woodford
Winnebago
Williamson
Will
Whiteside
White
WayneWashington
Warren
Wabash
Vermilion
Union
Tazewell
Stephenson
Stark
Shelby
Scott
Schuyler
Sangamon
Saline
St. Clair
Rock Island
Richland
Randolph
Putnam
Pulaski
Pope
Pike
Piatt
Perry
Peoria
Ogle
Moultrie
Morgan
Montgomery
Monroe
Mercer
Menard
Massac
Mason
Marshall
Marion
Madison
Macoupin
Macon
McLean
McHenry
McDonough
Logan
Livingston
Lee
Lawrence
La Salle
Lake
Knox
Kendall
Kankakee
Kane
Johnson
Jo Daviess
Jersey
Jefferson
Jasper
Jackson
Iroquois
Henry
Henderson
Hardin
Hancock
Hamilton
Grundy
Greene
Gallatin
Fulton
Franklin
Ford
Fayette
Effingham
Edwards
Edgar
Du Page
Douglas
De Witt
De Kalb
Cumberland
Crawford
Cook
Coles
Clinton
Clay
Clark
Christian
Champaign
Cass
Carroll
Calhoun
Bureau
Brown
Boone
Bond
Alexander
Adams
Illinois
Kentucky
Indiana
Total dissolved solids (ppm)<20,00020,000–60,00060,000–100,000100,000–140,000140,000–180,000Salinity data points
BaseIllinois Basin outline
0 40 mi
0 60 kmN
Figure 5 Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (MGSC) map of total dissolved solids (TDS, mg/L) in the groundwater from the Mt. Simon Sandstone (from MGSC 2005). The locations of the 57 TDS data points are shown by black dots.
6 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
Table 1 Distribution of the 329 compiled brine samplesby location
State Illinois Indiana Total
TDS1 samples 302 27 329Counties 31 7 38Wells with multiple samples 45 6 51Total wells 159 10 1691TDS, total dissolved solids
Table 2 Sources for brine samples by contributing institution
Institution Number
Government sources Illinois State Geological Survey 94 Illinois State Water Survey/Illinois State Geological Survey 33 Illinois State Water Survey 1 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 2 Indiana Geological Survey 17 U.S. Geological Survey 1 Subtotal 148
Industrial sources Allied Chemical 2 Ameren/CIPS 71 FutureGen Industrial Alliance 2 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. 5 Nicor 51 Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. 42 People’s Gas 4 Steel companies 4 Subtotal 181
Total 329
the most recent sample was collected in 2011. The majority of samples were col-lected during drilling for the natural gas storage fields, which occurred in the late 1950s through the early 1970s.
Contour Map DevelopmentIn developing a contour map, many choices regarding gridding and contour-ing methods must be made. We wanted to develop contour maps using the same gridding and contouring options for the MGSC (2005) and the new data sets, but the details of the MGSC (2005) map were unknown. For this study, all contour maps were developed using point kriging with no search radius (i.e., all data used), a 250-m grid spacing, and the UTM16N/NAD1983 coordinate system. Figure 7a shows the TDS map using the new data, whereas Figure 7b shows the TDS map based on the
MGSC (2005) data. For both data sets, the kriging method produced negative contours in the northwest portion of the grid, which are physically unrealistic. These negative contours were removed using Surfer’s Grid Math function by resetting negative values to zeros. There are significant differences between the MGSC (2005) contour map (Figure 5) and our map developed with the same data (Figure 7b). The MGSC (2005) con-tour map shows higher maximum TDS values, and the contour lines in the eastern half of that map trend in a north-west-southeast direction. The higher TDS values in Figure 5 do not appear to be supported by the data points used in that study.
The new TDS map (Figure 8) shows the TDS contours based on 169 TDS data points displayed on a base map with state and county boundaries. This map is similar to the MGSC (2005) map (Figure
5), but some differences still remain. The trend of the contour lines in the eastern portion of the maps is still different—predominantly southwest-northeast in Figure 8 versus northwest-southeast in Figure 5. In addition, the maximum con-centrations in Figure 8 are higher and are supported with data points. Both maps would benefit from more data in Indiana and southern Illinois. Unlike the previous maps, our contour map contains several bull’s-eyes in northern Illinois and Indiana. These bull’s-eyes reflect the variability of the TDS values observed in our larger data set. A com-parison of the 10,000 mg/L TDS lines on the various TDS maps (Figure 9) shows that our line has a shape similar to the line drawn by Brower et al. (1989) but is a minimum of 10 miles farther north in central Illinois and a maximum of 50 miles north in western Illinois. The line by Morse and Leetaru (2005) is consis-
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 7
0 40,000 80,000 120,000 160,000 200,000
TDS (mg/L)
0
10
20
30
0
Num
ber
10
20
30
0
Num
ber
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Num
ber
All TDS data (329 samples)
Contour map TDS data (169 samples)
2005 TDS data (57 samples)
Figure 6 Histograms comparing the total dissolved solids (TDS) distributions for all 329 data points (top), for the 169 data points used for the contour map (middle), and for the original data set of the 2005 Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium map (bottom). Note that the y axis for the top plot covers twice the range of the other two plots.
8 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
100,0004,100,000
4,150,000
4,200,000
4,250,000
4,300,000
4,350,000
4,400,000
4,450,000
4,500,000
4,550,000
4,600,000
4,650,000
4,700,000
4,750,000
200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000
10,000
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
0
Total dissolvedsolids (mg/L)
10,0
0025
,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
10,0
00
25,0
00
50,000
75,000
100,
000
150,
000
150,000
200,
000
200,000
250,000
Figure 7 (a) Contour map of the updated data set using point kriging with no search radius and a grid spacing of 250 m. (b) New contour map of the data from the Midwest Geologic Sequestration Consortium (2005) salinity map using point kriging with no search radius and a grid spacing of 250 m.
100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,0004,100,000
4,150,000
4,200,000
4,250,000
4,300,000
4,350,000
4,400,000
4,450,000
4,500,000
4,550,000
4,600,000
4,650,000
4,700,000
4,750,000
Total dissolvedsolids (mg/L)
10,000
0
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
10,0
00
100,000
10,000
25,0
00
25,000
50,0
00
50,000
75,0
00
75,0
00
75,000
a.
b.
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 9
tently the northernmost line, whereas the line by Visocky et al. (1985) is gener-ally the southernmost line. Three lines (Bergstrom 1968; Visocky et al. 1985; Morse and Leetaru 2005) do not trend southwest-northeast in western Illinois. In western Illinois, the Mt. Simon occurs at shallower depths, which is reflected in the groundwater salinity and is shown by Brower et al. (1989) and in Figure 8. In summary, the new TDS map has the greatest complexity, but this complex-ity is supported by the largest set of TDS values available to date.
As an alternative to a contour map, the TDS data can also be displayed using a bubble chart. The bubble chart does not project TDS values beyond the physical
100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,0004,000,000
4,100,000
4,200,000
4,300,000
4,400,000
4,500,000
4,600,000
4,700,0000
10,000
25,000
50,000
75,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Total dissolvedsolids (mg/L)
10,00
0
25,0
00
50,00
0
75,00
0
100,000
150,
000
200,
000 250,000
200,000
150,000
100,00075,000
25,0
00
Figure 8 Filled contour map of 169 data points (orange circles) for groundwater salinity in the Mt. Simon Sandstone, where salinity is quantified by total dissolved solids. The extent of the contours has been limited by the vertical and horizontal extents of Illinois and Indiana. The vertical and horizontal ranges are 4,100,000 to 4,750,000 m and 100,000 to 690,000 m, respectively.
extent of each sample. Extrapolation and interpolation are part of the contour mapping process and are inherently subject to error because they estimate values for areas without samples. In addition, a bubble chart does not require selecting a single value to represent a well, as required when developing a contour map. The bubble chart was developed using all 329 TDS data points (Figure 10) and shows the variability of TDS data. The variability seems to have two primary sources—temporal and vertical variability of the TDS samples. The TDS samples in this study were col-lected over a 100-year time span. Thus, hydrogeologic conditions may have changed over that time, particularly in northeastern Illinois, which has expe-
rienced significant groundwater with-drawals. The vertical variability arises from the fact that samples have been collected at different depths, sometimes from the same well. Limited data indi-cate that TDS in the Mt. Simon increases with depth at a given location. This vari-ability can be seen in Figure 10 by the overlapping symbols in northeastern Illinois, northwestern Indiana, and cen-tral Illinois.
In summary, a map showing the distri-bution of salinity within the Mt. Simon in Illinois and Indiana has been updated using a much larger data set. The distri-bution of TDS within the Mt. Simon is more complex than previously mapped. The map shows the data used to develop
10 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
JO DAVIESS STEPHENSON WINNEBAGO BOONE MC HENRY
CARROLL OGLEDE KALB
LEEWHITESIDE
LAKE
KANE COOK
DU PAGE
KENDALL WILL
GRUNDY
LA SALLE
BUREAU
KANKAKEE
LIVINGSTONMARSHALL
PUTNAM
STARK
PEORIA IROQUOIS
FORD
MC LEAN
TAZEWELL
WOODFORD
MASON
DEWITT
CHAMPAIGN
PIATT
LOGAN
MACON
CHRISTIAN
SHELBY
MOULTRIE
DOUGLAS
COLES
CUMBERLAND
FAYETTEEFFINGHAM
BOND
CLINTON
MARION
CLAY
JASPER
RICHLAND
WAYNE
JEFFERSONWASHINGTON
MADISON
ST. CLAIR
MONROE
RANDOLPH PERRY
FRANKLIN
HAMILTON
JACKSON
WILLIAMSONSALINE
WHITE
GALLATIN
UNION JOHNSON POPE HARDIN
MASSACPULASKI
HENRY
KNOX
MERCER
WARREN
ROCK ISLAND
HANCOCK MC DONOUGHFULTON
SCHUYLERADAMS
BROWN
CASS
MORGAN SANGAMONPIKE
SCOTT
GREENE MACOUPIN
MONTGOMERY
JERSEY
VERMILION
EDGAR
CLARK
CRAWFORDLAWRENCE
MENARD
CALHO
UN
ALEXANDER
EDW
ARD
S WABASH
HEND
ERSO
N
Bergstrom (1968)
Viscocky et al. (1985)
Brower et al. (1989)
Morse and Leetaru (2005)
This report
0 20 40 60 mi
0 100 km50N
Figure 9 Location of the 10,000 mg/L total dissolved solids (TDS) lines for ground-water in the Mt. Simon Sandstone for this study and from four published maps. Indiana is excluded from this map because the 10,000 mg/L line for this study (in red) did not extend into Indiana and the other four reports did not include Indiana on their TDS maps.
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 11
100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000
4,200,000
4,300,000
4,400,000
4,500,000
4,600,000
4,700,000
4,800,000TDS (mg/L)
>200K
175–200K
150–175K
125–150K
100–125K
75–100K
50–75K
25–50K
10–25K
TDS <10K
Figure 10 Bubble chart of the groundwater salinity in the Mt. Simon Sandstone based on 329 total dissolved solids (TDS) data points. Unlike the contour map, this chart demonstrates the range of TDS values at a given location. It also shows some locations with greatly varying TDS magnitudes, especially in northwest-ern Indiana, where values range from 10,000 to 150,000 mg/L. Note that the symbol size increases with the magnitude of TDS.
the TDS contours. The data density is highest in northern Illinois and declines toward the south and east. Hidden in the TDS data is some of its variability. Tem-poral and vertical variability in when and where the groundwater samples were collected are thought to be the major factors controlling this variability. Users of this TDS map should appreciate this variability.
AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the following people who provided assis-tance in the development and publish-ing of this report and its figures: Chris-topher P. Korose, ISGS, provided the GIS support necessary for mapping the TDS data. John A. Rupp, Indiana Geological Survey (Bloomington IN), provided TDS data for many wells in Indiana. Neeraj Gupta, Battelle Memorial Institute
(Columbus OH), provided informa-tion regarding TDS data for wells in Illinois and Indiana. Compilation of the TDS data was assisted by Damon Garner, ISGS, and by many ISGS student employees, including Daniel Beach, Sarah Buckley, Dean Ekberg, Alex Fleshman, Lauren Frendreis, Jessica Hinton, Torrey Loper, Madeline Schuh, and Laura Tan. C. Pius Weibel, Samuel V. Panno, and Donald A. Keefer, ISGS,
12 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
reviewed this report and provided com-ments to improve it. This research was partially supported with funds from the USEPA, Office of Research and Develop-ment, National Center for Environmen-tal Research, through USEPA Funding Opportunity EPA-G2008-STAR-H1 (EPA RD-83438201). Barbara Klieforth and Angela D. Page served as project officers for the USEPA.
ReferencesAdams, N., 2013, Coupling TOUGH2 and
SEAWAT variable-density models to understand potential geologic carbon sequestration impacts on groundwa-ter resources: University of Illinois, Department of Civil and Environ-mental Engineering, M.S. thesis, 97 p.
Barlow, P.M., 2003, Ground water in freshwater-saltwater environments of the Atlantic coast: U.S. Geological Survey, Circular 1262, 113 p.
Bergstrom, R.E., 1968, Feasibility of sub-surface disposal of industrial wastes in Illinois: Illinois State Geological Survey, Circular 426, 18 p.
Brower, R.D., A.P. Visocky, I.G. Krapac, B.R. Hensel, G.R. Peyton, J.S. Nealon, and M. Guthrie, 1989, Evaluation of underground injection of industrial waste in Illinois: Illinois Scientific Surveys, Joint Report 2, 89 p.
Meents, W.F., A.H. Bell, O.W. Rees, and W.G. Tilbury, 1952, Illinois oil-field brines: Their geologic occurrence and chemical composition: Illinois State Geological Survey, Illinois Petroleum 66, 38 p.
Mehnert, E., J. Damico, S. Frailey, H. Leetaru, Y.-F. Lin, R. Okwen, N. Adams, B. Storsved, and A. Valocchi, 2013, Development of a basin-scale model for CO
2 sequestration in the
basal sandstone reservoir of the Illi-nois Basin—Issues, approach and preliminary results: Energy Procedia, v. 37, p. 3850–3858.
Midwest Geological Sequestration Con-sortium (MGSC), 2005, Salinity of the Mt. Simon Sandstone in the Illinois Basin [map], 1:1,000,000, http://sequestration.org/resources/publish/saline_salinity_map_dec05.pdf.
Morse, D.G., and H.E. Leetaru, 2005, Reservoir characterization and three-dimensional models of Mt. Simon gas storage fields in the Illinois Basin: Illi-nois State Geological Survey, Circular 567, 72 p.
Pruess, K., and J. Garcia, 2002, Mul-tiphase flow dynamics during CO
2
disposal into saline aquifers: Envi-ronmental Geology, v. 42, no. 2–3, p. 282–295.
Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Plan-ning Commission and Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey (SEWRPC), 2002, Groundwa-ter resources of southeastern Wiscon-sin: Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, Technical Report 37, 203 p.
Stumm, W., and J.J. Morgan, 1996, Aquatic chemistry: Chemical equi-libria and rates in natural waters, third edition: New York, Wiley-Inter-science.
U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2012, The United States 2012 carbon utiliza-tion and storage atlas, fourth edition: U.S. Department of Energy, 129 p., http://www.netl.doe.gov/technolo-gies/carbon_seq/refshelf/atlasIV/.
Visocky, A.P., M.G. Sherrill, and K. Cart-wright, 1985, Geology, hydrology, and water quality of the Cambrian and Ordovician systems in northern Illi-nois: Illinois State Geological Survey and Illinois State Water Survey, Coop-erative Groundwater Report 10, 136 p.
Zhou, Q., J.T. Birkholzer, E. Mehnert, Y.-F. Lin, and K. Zhang, 2010, Model-ing basin- and plume-scale processes of CO
2 storage for full-scale deploy-
ment: Ground Water, v. 48, no. 4, p. 494–514.
Appe
ndix
Tab
le A
1 Li
st o
f tot
al d
isso
lved
sol
ids
(TD
S)
data
use
d in
this
rep
ort1
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1200
7002
9200
Bel
vide
re C
ity #
3IL
Boo
ne25
44N
3E34
8,50
44,
680,
127
1,80
029
6.87
yes
1200
7002
9200
Bel
vide
re C
ity #
3IL
Boo
ne25
44N
3E34
8,50
44,
680,
127
1,80
373
8no
1200
7003
4300
Bel
vide
re C
ity #
2IL
Boo
ne25
44N
3E34
8,91
54,
680,
528
1,86
168
4no
1201
5000
0200
Mt.
Car
roll
#3IL
Car
roll
1224
N4E
253,
332
4,66
4,49
71,
453
376
no
1201
9002
6700
Peo
ples
Gas
Lig
ht a
nd C
oke
#1IL
Cha
mpa
ign
921
N7E
379,
864
4,46
0,20
93,
931
82,6
00ye
s
1201
9002
8100
Hin
ton
Bro
ther
s #2
ILC
ham
paig
n21
21N
7E37
9,88
54,
458,
362
3,89
294
,800
yes
1201
9002
8500
Hun
t, A
.G. #
5 IL
Cha
mpa
ign
1621
N7E
380,
033
4,45
9,98
63,
942
90,0
00ye
s
1201
9007
5200
Haz
en, F
. #1
ILC
ham
paig
n20
21N
7E37
8,62
34,
457,
143
4,56
083
,700
no
1201
9011
8500
Buc
kles
#2
ILC
ham
paig
n21
21N
7E37
9,35
24,
457,
153
3,94
085
,700
yes
1201
9013
3700
Leis
chne
r, W
. #3
ILC
ham
paig
n10
21N
7E38
0,72
64,
460,
824
4,16
090
,400
no
1201
9014
2500
Wils
on #
1-33
ILC
ham
paig
n33
17N
8E38
9,07
74,
415,
541
4,02
678
,235
yes
1201
9014
2600
Woo
dwor
th #
1-33
ILC
ham
paig
n33
17N
8E38
7,84
84,
415,
241
4,68
211
5,22
2ye
s
1201
9014
2600
Woo
dwor
th #
1-33
ILC
ham
paig
n33
17N
8E38
7,84
84,
415,
241
4,55
911
5,31
6ye
s
1201
9014
2600
Woo
dwor
th #
1-33
ILC
ham
paig
n33
17N
8E38
7,84
84,
415,
241
4,68
211
7,51
5ye
s
1201
9014
2600
Woo
dwor
th #
1-33
ILC
ham
paig
n33
17N
8E38
7,84
84,
415,
241
4,55
911
9,41
5ye
s
1201
9014
2700
Boy
er #
1-34
ILC
ham
paig
n34
17N
8E39
0,66
14,
415,
158
4,23
210
6,12
3ye
s
1201
9014
2700
Boy
er #
1-34
ILC
ham
paig
n34
17N
8E39
0,66
14,
415,
158
4,09
311
6,51
6ye
s
1201
9014
2700
Boy
er #
1-34
ILC
ham
paig
n34
17N
8E39
0,66
14,
415,
158
4,55
912
4,58
8ye
s
1201
9216
1700
Haz
en, F
. #4
ILC
ham
paig
n27
21N
7E38
0,64
54,
455,
953
4,05
583
,300
yes
1201
9217
1400
Bid
ner,
O. #
2IL
Cha
mpa
ign
1521
N7E
381,
413
4,45
9,14
64,
265
83,6
00no
1201
9219
7200
Slo
an, V
. #1
ILC
ham
paig
n5
21N
7E37
8,33
94,
462,
408
4,21
882
,700
no
1201
9225
4700
Kam
erer
, F. #
3IL
Cha
mpa
ign
2621
N7E
381,
868
4,45
6,69
14,
254
85,5
00no
1201
9238
9600
Will
iam
s, J
. #4
ILC
ham
paig
n16
21N
7E38
0,12
14,
458,
399
3,89
895
,800
yes
1203
1003
7100
Wes
tern
Spr
ings
#4
ILC
ook
638
N12
E42
4,31
34,
628,
768
1,91
015
,500
yes
1203
1016
2300
Riv
ersi
de C
ity #
4IL
Coo
k25
39N
12E
432,
397
4,63
2,59
41,
980
670
yes
1203
1024
2200
Wes
tern
Spr
ings
City
#1
ILC
ook
638
N12
E42
4,66
74,
628,
540
2046
932
no
1203
1038
4500
Mt.
Pro
spec
t Vill
. #5
ILC
ook
3442
N11
E42
2,61
24,
658,
922
1,82
045
3no
1203
9003
9100
Lam
b, J
. #1
ILD
eWitt
120
N4E
355,
228
4,45
3,94
94,
570
107,
115
yes
1204
1007
9900
Sha
w, L
ewis
#1
ILD
ougl
as36
16N
8E39
2,72
04,
405,
467
4,15
110
2,70
0no
1204
1007
9900
Sha
w, L
ewis
#1
ILD
ougl
as36
16N
8E39
2,72
04,
405,
467
4,04
610
3,00
0ye
s
1204
1007
9900
Sha
w #
1IL
Dou
glas
3616
N8E
392,
720
4,40
5,46
74,
063
128,
312
yes
1204
1010
5000
Bris
tow
#1-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
389,
074
4,41
4,69
14,
135
78,0
90ye
s
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 13
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1204
1010
5000
Bris
tow
#1-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
389,
074
4,41
4,69
14,
081
92,1
33ye
s
1204
1010
5000
Bris
tow
#1-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
389,
074
4,41
4,69
14,
135
101,
477
yes
1204
1010
5000
Bris
tow
#1-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
389,
074
4,41
4,69
14,
038
112,
656
yes
1204
1010
5000
Bris
tow
#1-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
389,
074
4,41
4,69
14,
135
113,
144
yes
1204
1010
5000
Bris
tow
#1-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
389,
074
4,41
4,69
13,
995
113,
144
yes
1204
1010
5100
DeB
olt #
1-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,07
74,
414,
240
4,03
077
,703
yes
1204
1010
5100
DeB
olt #
1-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,07
74,
414,
240
4,03
112
3,05
6ye
s
1204
1010
5100
DeB
olt #
1-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,07
74,
414,
240
4,03
118
2,50
9ye
s
1204
1010
5200
DeB
olt #
2-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,69
94,
413,
866
4,03
787
,723
yes
1204
1010
5200
DeB
olt #
2-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,69
94,
413,
866
4,03
799
,727
yes
1204
1010
5200
DeB
olt #
2-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,69
94,
413,
866
4,03
711
9,02
0ye
s
1204
1010
5200
DeB
olt #
2-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,69
94,
413,
866
4,27
512
9,99
7ye
s
1204
1010
5200
DeB
olt #
2-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,69
94,
413,
866
4,24
013
8,21
9ye
s
1204
1010
5200
DeB
olt #
2-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,69
94,
413,
866
4,24
013
9,79
1ye
s
1204
1010
5200
DeB
olt #
2-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,69
94,
413,
866
4,03
718
6,02
5ye
s
1204
1010
5300
DeB
olt #
3-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,99
84,
414,
242
3,89
010
3,28
0ye
s
1204
1010
5300
DeB
olt #
3-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
8,99
84,
414,
242
3,89
013
1,55
0ye
s
1204
1011
2900
Bris
tow
#2-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
388,
658
4,41
4,34
54,
016
97,1
20ye
s
1204
1011
3000
Bris
tow
#3-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
388,
659
4,41
4,76
94,
026
96,7
03ye
s
1204
1011
3000
Bris
tow
#3-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
388,
659
4,41
4,76
94,
026
110,
025
yes
1204
1011
3000
Bris
tow
#3-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
388,
659
4,41
4,76
94,
026
118,
127
yes
1204
1011
3000
Bris
tow
#3-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
388,
659
4,41
4,76
94,
026
134,
476
yes
1204
1011
3000
Bris
tow
#3-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
388,
659
4,41
4,76
94,
026
137,
105
yes
1204
1011
3000
Bris
tow
#3-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
388,
659
4,41
4,76
94,
026
181,
622
yes
1204
1011
3100
Bris
tow
#4-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
388,
654
4,41
5,12
94,
030
125,
657
yes
1204
1011
3200
Bris
tow
#5-
4IL
Dou
glas
416
N8E
389,
059
4,41
5,12
84,
038
77,6
87ye
s
1204
1011
3300
DeB
olt #
4-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,08
04,
413,
859
4,02
973
,378
yes
1204
1011
3300
DeB
olt #
4-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,08
04,
413,
859
4,02
982
,498
yes
1204
1011
3300
DeB
olt #
4-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,08
04,
413,
859
4,02
911
3,21
0ye
s
1204
1011
3300
DeB
olt #
4-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,08
04,
413,
859
4,02
911
8,26
9ye
s
1204
1011
3300
DeB
olt #
4-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,08
04,
413,
859
4,02
913
5,10
2ye
s
1204
1011
3300
DeB
olt #
4-4
ILD
ougl
as4
16N
8E38
9,08
04,
413,
859
4,02
918
2,37
5ye
s
1204
1011
3400
Bun
dy #
3-9
ILD
ougl
as9
16N
8E38
9,10
94,
413,
049
4,05
710
2,29
7ye
s
14 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1204
1011
3500
Rah
n #1
-9IL
Dou
glas
916
N8E
388,
690
4,41
3,43
14,
058
103,
383
yes
1204
1011
3600
Hun
sake
r #1
-15
ILD
ougl
as9
16N
8E38
9,76
44,
410,
254
4,14
589
,309
yes
1204
1011
3600
Hun
sake
r #1
-15
ILD
ougl
as15
16N
8E38
9,76
44,
410,
254
4,03
411
4,57
0ye
s
1204
1011
3600
Hun
sake
r #1
-15
ILD
ougl
as10
16N
8E38
9,76
44,
410,
254
4,03
411
5,74
4ye
s
1204
1011
4100
Bun
dy #
2-9
ILD
ougl
as9
16N
8E38
9,44
64,
413,
416
4,06
712
6,06
0ye
s
1204
3010
1300
Am
eric
an P
otas
h &
Che
mic
al W
D-1
ILD
uPag
e9
39N
9E39
9,71
74,
636,
320
2,13
062
0no
1204
3010
1300
Am
eric
an P
otas
h &
Che
mic
al W
D-1
ILD
uPag
e9
39N
9E39
9,71
74,
636,
320
4,02
081
,780
yes
1204
3019
4700
C.M
. & S
t. P
aul R
R #
1IL
DuP
age
1340
N11
E42
3,22
74,
645,
183
2,29
043
0ye
s
1204
3241
4900
Bar
tlett
Vill
age
#4IL
DuP
age
1140
N9E
402,
481
4,64
7,46
91,
985
512
yes
1205
3000
0100
ER
P #
1IL
For
d19
24N
7E37
7,15
34,
486,
420
4,22
057
,600
yes
1207
1003
1400
Oliv
er, L
. #1
ILH
ende
rson
79N
4W17
0,99
44,
522,
654
2,74
012
,950
no
1207
1003
1700
Lilla
rd #
1IL
Hen
ders
on14
9N5W
167,
659
4,52
1,59
03,
138
14,7
90no
1207
1203
4900
Oliv
er, L
. #3
ILH
ende
rson
79N
4W17
1,39
44,
522,
639
2,05
418
,180
yes
1207
1203
5100
Bro
ok, J
. #1
ILH
ende
rson
189N
4W17
1,27
84,
519,
819
2,88
514
,620
no
1207
1203
6800
Hea
p, R
eva
#1IL
Hen
ders
on16
9N4W
175,
368
4,52
1,02
32,
940
14,2
75no
1207
3003
6000
Sou
th, E
.A. #
1IL
Hen
ry30
16N
1E21
2,70
44,
582,
471
2,63
55,
900
yes
1207
5009
1400
Ow
ings
#20
1IL
Iroq
uois
1826
N12
W43
6,50
74,
508,
945
3,74
693
,586
yes
1207
5009
1600
Hum
mel
#20
1IL
Iroq
uois
1626
N13
W43
0,41
34,
510,
407
3,70
496
,202
yes
1207
5009
1700
Tade
n #2
09IL
Iroq
uois
1126
N13
W43
3,59
54,
512,
096
3,46
786
,600
yes
1207
5009
2400
Hun
gess
#20
1IL
Iroq
uois
126
N13
W43
5,22
64,
512,
181
3,70
497
,834
yes
1207
5009
2600
Tade
n #2
10IL
Iroq
uois
1126
N13
W43
3,63
34,
511,
694
3,58
092
,340
yes
1208
5003
4600
Gal
ena
City
Wel
l #2
ILJo
Dav
iess
2428
N1W
217,
789
4,70
1,15
31,
491
235
no
1208
5003
4600
Gal
ena
City
Wel
l #2
ILJo
Dav
iess
2428
N1W
217,
789
4,70
1,15
31,
491
245
yes
1208
5003
4600
Gal
ena
City
Wel
l #2
ILJo
Dav
iess
2428
N1W
217,
789
4,70
1,15
31,
491
269
yes
1208
5003
4600
Gal
ena
City
Wel
l #2
ILJo
Dav
iess
2428
N1W
217,
789
4,70
1,15
31,
491
294
yes
1208
5003
4700
Gal
ena
ILJo
Dav
iess
2428
N1W
217,
896
4,70
1,24
798
123
5ye
s
1208
5004
1300
Eas
t Dub
uque
, City
Wel
l #1
ILJo
Dav
iess
2029
N2W
200,
513
4,71
0,92
71,
502
272
no
1208
9006
0500
Bat
avia
City
#3
ILK
ane
2238
N8E
391,
389
4,63
3,79
72,
200
459
no
1208
9006
4100
Wat
erw
ell #
2IL
Kan
e33
39N
8E38
9,47
34,
630,
416
2,30
01,
248
yes
1208
9006
6300
Aur
ora
City
#5
ILK
ane
1538
N8E
391,
161
4,62
6,08
22,
250
281.
6ye
s
1208
9006
6600
Aur
ora
City
#12
-AIL
Kan
e15
38N
8E39
1,15
64,
626,
272
2,25
178
0no
1208
9006
8600
Aur
ora
City
ILK
ane
2738
N8E
391,
041
4,62
1,61
32,
185
245.
2ye
s
1208
9006
8800
Aur
ora
City
#7
ILK
ane
2838
N8E
389,
388
4,62
2,40
42,
263
564.
1ye
s
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 15
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1208
9007
0100
Aur
ora
City
Par
kIL
Kan
e35
38N
8E39
2,40
44,
621,
556
2,75
92,
015.
4ye
s
1208
9007
0100
Aur
ora
City
Par
kIL
Kan
e35
38N
8E39
2,40
44,
621,
556
2,75
92,
992
yes
1208
9007
2100
Gen
eva
City
#3
ILK
ane
338
N8E
390,
514
4,63
9,07
42,
300
334
yes
1208
9007
8200
Shu
ler
Str
eet W
ell
ILK
ane
1441
N8E
392,
277
4,65
4,04
21,
940
395
no
1208
9007
8500
Elg
in S
tate
Hos
p. #
2IL
Kan
e23
41N
8E39
2,67
44,
652,
549
2,00
028
0ye
s
1208
9008
2500
St.
Cha
rles
#6IL
Kan
e34
40N
8E39
0,89
84,
640,
312
2,24
936
7ye
s
1208
9008
9300
Elg
in C
ity W
ell #
1IL
Kan
e11
41N
8E39
2,45
74,
655,
749
2,00
031
8ye
s
1209
1000
7300
Sch
war
k 1-
MIL
Kan
kake
e32
30N
10E
407,
156
4,54
3,21
82,
590
17,3
13no
1209
1000
7600
Bar
tlett
1-M
ILK
anka
kee
3330
N10
E40
7,98
24,
543,
325
2,66
517
,402
no
1209
1000
9700
Kni
ttel 1
-MIL
Kan
kake
e32
30N
10E
407,
544
4,54
3,22
02,
583
17,2
01no
1209
1001
4700
Kilp
atric
k M
-1IL
Kan
kake
e29
30N
10E
407,
136
4,54
4,11
12,
656
16,4
40no
1209
1001
5100
Kni
ttel M
-3IL
Kan
kake
e32
30N
10E
407,
953
4,54
2,44
32,
665
17,7
07no
1209
1002
5802
Hei
mbe
rger
#1
ILK
anka
kee
830
N10
E40
7,11
54,
549,
015
2,58
616
,793
yes
1209
1002
8500
Dic
kman
#1
ILK
anka
kee
2030
N10
E40
7,89
84,
546,
536
2,72
017
,863
yes
1209
1003
1800
Kar
cher
#6
ILK
anka
kee
3230
N10
E40
7,15
44,
543,
664
2,43
918
,940
yes
1209
1003
1800
Kar
cher
#6
ILK
anka
kee
3230
N10
E40
7,15
44,
543,
664
2,44
219
,055
yes
1209
1004
0000
Par
ish
#1IL
Kan
kake
e24
31N
13E
442,
787
4,55
6,38
95,
045
38,6
55no
1209
1004
6801
Coo
k, P
. #1
ILK
anka
kee
330
N9E
399,
920
4,55
1,68
82,
204
9,36
2ye
s
1209
1005
1400
San
ds, O
.M. #
1IL
Kan
kake
e3
29N
10E
410,
549
4,54
0,82
42,
586
19,9
40ye
s
1209
1005
1700
Sei
mer
ing,
M. #
1IL
Kan
kake
e8
29N
10E
407,
166
4,54
0,75
42,
689
20,1
45ye
s
Mom
ence
ILK
anka
kee
2431
N13
E44
3,53
44,
556,
404
2,80
038
,002
yes
1209
7017
7900
Am
eric
an S
teel
& W
ire W
orks
#1
ILLa
ke33
45N
12E
431,
598
4,68
7,75
12,
200
555
yes
1209
7023
7200
Lake
Blu
ff #3
ILLa
ke20
44N
12E
430,
089
4,68
1,04
11,
828
510
no
1209
7341
4200
IL B
each
Sta
te P
ark
#1IL
Lake
1446
N12
E43
4,29
04,
702,
068
1,77
51,
600
no
1209
7341
4200
IL B
each
Sta
te P
ark
#1IL
Lake
1446
N12
E43
4,29
04,
702,
068
1,77
52,
570
no
1209
7341
4200
IL B
each
Sta
te P
ark
#1IL
Lake
1446
N12
E43
4,29
04,
702,
068
1,93
255
,800
yes
1209
9003
3100
City
Wel
lIL
LaS
alle
2531
N3E
346,
246
4,55
4,21
02,
496
12,4
37.1
yes
1209
9008
2400
Mat
heiu
s #1
ILLa
Sal
le32
35N
1E32
1,89
04,
603,
990
1,42
12,
330
yes
1209
9010
2600
Sw
ense
n #1
ILLa
Sal
le1
36N
5E36
5,88
34,
609,
453
3,50
065
,022
yes
1209
9010
2600
Sw
ense
n #1
ILLa
Sal
le1
36N
5E36
5,88
34,
609,
453
3,46
467
,000
yes
1209
9010
2600
Sw
ense
n #1
ILLa
Sal
le1
36N
5E36
5,88
34,
609,
453
3,50
067
,068
yes
1209
9010
2600
Sw
ense
n #1
ILLa
Sal
le1
36N
5E36
5,88
34,
609,
453
3,50
067
,700
yes
1209
9016
4700
Kris
chel
#2
ILLa
Sal
le24
30N
2E33
6,49
34,
545,
533
2,50
817
,112
yes
16 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1209
9016
4700
Kris
chel
#2
ILLa
Sal
le24
30N
2E33
6,49
34,
545,
533
2,50
817
,574
yes
1209
9016
4700
Kris
chel
#2
ILLa
Sal
le24
30N
2E33
6,49
34,
545,
533
2,50
818
,448
yes
1209
9017
8100
Sch
euer
#1
ILLa
Sal
le14
30N
2E33
5,31
54,
547,
189
2,20
312
,852
yes
1209
9017
8100
Sch
euer
#1
ILLa
Sal
le14
30N
2E33
5,31
54,
547,
189
2,20
313
,174
yes
1209
9017
8200
Sch
euer
#4
ILLa
Sal
le14
30N
2E33
5,70
34,
547,
175
2,20
113
,706
yes
1209
9017
9400
Sch
euer
#5
ILLa
Sal
le14
30N
2E33
5,32
44,
547,
516
2,51
912
,886
yes
1209
9017
9400
Sch
euer
#5
ILLa
Sal
le14
30N
2E33
5,32
44,
547,
516
2,51
913
,496
yes
1209
9017
9600
Gra
nger
#1
ILLa
Sal
le14
30N
2E33
6,08
44,
547,
924
2,34
212
,768
yes
1209
9017
9600
Gra
nger
#1
ILLa
Sal
le14
30N
2E33
6,08
44,
547,
924
2,34
213
,424
yes
1209
9017
9700
Hea
ly #
1IL
LaS
alle
1530
N2E
332,
936
4,54
8,67
72,
358
10,3
68ye
s
1209
9017
9800
Bar
r #1
ILLa
Sal
le22
30N
2E33
4,08
84,
546,
342
2,37
012
,258
yes
1209
9017
9800
Bar
r #1
ILLa
Sal
le22
30N
2E33
4,08
84,
546,
342
2,37
013
,026
yes
1210
5002
6600
For
dyce
#1
ILLi
ving
ston
3330
N3E
342,
429
4,54
3,29
12,
178
17,9
01no
1210
5002
7200
Feh
r #1
ILLi
ving
ston
2730
N3E
342,
592
4,54
3,97
42,
685
25,8
00no
1210
5002
7500
Sm
ith #
1IL
Livi
ngst
on3
29N
3E34
3,49
44,
542,
272
2,48
822
,184
yes
1210
5002
7600
For
dyce
#4
ILLi
ving
ston
3330
N3E
342,
500
4,54
3,10
62,
396
19,8
04no
1210
5002
7600
For
dyce
#4
ILLi
ving
ston
3330
N3E
342,
500
4,54
3,10
62,
396
21,4
00no
1210
5002
7700
Mus
ser
#1IL
Livi
ngst
on32
30N
3E34
0,44
14,
542,
280
2,53
518
,416
yes
1210
5002
7800
For
dyce
#5
ILLi
ving
ston
3330
N3E
342,
131
4,54
3,10
22,
369
18,3
00ye
s
1210
5007
3900
Fie
nhol
d #1
ILLi
ving
ston
3328
N6E
370,
026
4,52
4,35
73,
008
50,8
00ye
s
1210
5007
4000
Mac
kins
on #
1IL
Livi
ngst
on22
28N
6E37
1,49
14,
526,
028
3,48
050
,200
no
1210
5007
4100
Fei
nhol
d #2
ILLi
ving
ston
2228
N6E
371,
262
4,52
7,57
23,
296
51,7
00no
1210
5007
4200
Dod
son
#1IL
Livi
ngst
on5
27N
6E36
9,57
14,
521,
108
3,45
453
,300
no
1210
5007
8300
Cle
veng
er #
1IL
Livi
ngst
on17
28N
6E36
9,59
44,
528,
776
3,37
540
,700
no
1210
5007
8900
Fie
nhol
d #5
ILLi
ving
ston
3328
N6E
369,
655
4,52
3,97
83,
271
47,1
00no
1211
5234
1500
AD
M C
CS
-1IL
Mac
on5
16N
3E33
8,08
14,
415,
813
5,77
216
4,50
0ye
s
1211
5234
1500
AD
M C
CS
-1IL
Mac
on5
16N
3E33
8,08
14,
415,
813
6,76
417
9,80
0ye
s
1211
5234
1500
AD
M C
CS
-1IL
Mac
on5
16N
3E33
8,08
14,
415,
813
6,84
018
2,30
0ye
s
1211
5234
1500
AD
M C
CS
-1IL
Mac
on5
16N
3E33
8,08
14,
415,
813
6,76
418
5,60
0ye
s
1211
5234
1500
AD
M C
CS
-1IL
Mac
on5
16N
3E33
8,08
14,
415,
813
7,04
520
1,50
0ye
s
1211
5234
1500
AD
M C
CS
-1IL
Mac
on5
16N
3E33
8,08
14,
415,
813
6,91
221
1,70
0ye
s
1211
5234
1500
AD
M C
CS
-1IL
Mac
on5
16N
3E33
8,08
14,
415,
813
6,84
021
9,80
0ye
s
1211
5234
1500
AD
M C
CS
-1IL
Mac
on5
16N
3E33
8,08
14,
415,
813
7,04
522
8,10
0ye
s
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 17
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1211
5234
6000
AD
M V
erifi
catio
n W
ell #
1IL
Mac
on32
17N
3E33
8,09
54,
416,
131
5,65
3.8
149,
728
yes
1211
5234
6000
AD
M V
erifi
catio
n W
ell #
1IL
Mac
on32
17N
3E33
8,09
54,
416,
131
5,84
0.4
162,
416
yes
1211
5234
6000
AD
M V
erifi
catio
n W
ell #
1IL
Mac
on32
17N
3E33
8,09
54,
416,
131
6,41
6.2
200,
816
yes
1211
5234
6000
AD
M V
erifi
catio
n W
ell #
1IL
Mac
on32
17N
3E33
8,09
54,
416,
131
6,72
0.3
200,
912
yes
1211
5234
6000
AD
M V
erifi
catio
n W
ell #
1IL
Mac
on32
17N
3E33
8,09
54,
416,
131
6,63
2.3
201,
944
yes
1211
5234
6000
AD
M V
erifi
catio
n W
ell #
1IL
Mac
on32
17N
3E33
8,09
54,
416,
131
6,94
5.6
205,
788
yes
1211
5234
6000
AD
M V
erifi
catio
n W
ell #
1IL
Mac
on32
17N
3E33
8,09
54,
416,
131
6,98
320
6,47
2ye
s
1211
5234
6000
AD
M V
erifi
catio
n W
ell #
1IL
Mac
on32
17N
3E33
8,09
54,
416,
131
6,83
7.1
206,
828
yes
1211
9008
7601
Kirc
heis
, E.F
. 1-S
ILM
adis
on27
3N6W
260,
640
4,28
3,94
14,
955
87,0
44ye
s
1211
9008
7601
Kirc
heis
, E.F
. 1-S
ILM
adis
on27
3N6W
260,
640
4,28
3,94
14,
955
95,4
24ye
s
1211
9008
7601
Kirc
heis
, E.F
. 1-S
ILM
adis
on27
3N6W
260,
640
4,28
3,94
15,
018
98,4
94ye
s
1212
1051
9800
John
son,
R.S
. #1
ILM
ario
n6
1N2E
323,
765
4,26
9,02
08,
908
262,
962
yes
1210
9007
1400
Tr. o
f Pro
ctor
End
owm
ent S
M-2
ILM
cDon
ough
307N
3W18
0,70
44,
497,
488
2,69
017
,963
.1ye
s
1210
9007
1400
Tr. o
f Pro
ctor
End
owm
ent S
M-2
ILM
cDon
ough
307N
3W18
0,70
44,
497,
488
2,69
018
,359
.4ye
s
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
663
2,41
2ye
s
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
663
16,9
93.2
yes
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
663
18,0
98.6
yes
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
663
18,3
93ye
s
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
663
18,8
08ye
s
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
663
20,1
52ye
s
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
663
20,6
83ye
s
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
663
20,8
64ye
s
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
812
22,7
03ye
s
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
764
22,7
10no
1210
9007
1600
Hai
nlin
e, S
ilas
S-3
4IL
McD
onou
gh31
7N3W
179,
986
4,49
5,50
22,
812
22,7
21ye
s
1210
9007
1700
Tr. o
f Pro
ctor
End
owm
ent S
M-3
ILM
cDon
ough
207N
3W18
1,65
04,
499,
066
2,84
220
,039
no
1210
9007
6500
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-5
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,49
04,
496,
354
2,63
612
,385
.3ye
s
1210
9007
6500
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-5
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,49
04,
496,
354
2,63
618
,937
yes
1210
9007
6500
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-5
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,49
04,
496,
354
2,80
018
,978
no
1210
9007
6500
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-5
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,49
04,
496,
354
2,63
620
,401
yes
1210
9007
6500
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-5
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,49
04,
496,
354
2,63
620
,739
yes
1210
9007
6500
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-5
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,49
04,
496,
354
2,63
620
,951
yes
1210
9007
6500
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-5
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,49
04,
496,
354
2,63
620
,993
yes
18 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1210
9208
0100
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-7
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,69
74,
495,
968
2,66
019
,022
.7ye
s
1210
9208
0100
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-7
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,69
74,
495,
968
2,66
019
,768
yes
1210
9208
0100
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-7
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,69
74,
495,
968
2,66
020
,413
yes
1210
9208
0100
Pro
ctor
, J.C
. End
owm
ent S
M-7
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,69
74,
495,
968
2,66
023
,154
yes
1210
9208
1500
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tt S
M-1
0IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
976
4,49
4,80
22,
691
19,1
48.7
yes
1210
9208
1500
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tt S
M-1
0IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
976
4,49
4,80
22,
691
19,1
77ye
s
1210
9208
1500
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tt S
M-1
0IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
976
4,49
4,80
22,
691
20,0
04ye
s
1210
9208
1500
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tt S
M-1
0IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
976
4,49
4,80
22,
691
20,2
71ye
s
1210
9208
1500
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tt S
M-1
0IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
976
4,49
4,80
22,
691
20,6
50ye
s
1210
9208
1500
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tt S
M-1
0IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
976
4,49
4,80
22,
691
2407
4ye
s
1210
9208
1600
Che
now
eth,
Har
ry S
M-9
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,32
64,
495,
394
2,68
517
,903
.6ye
s
1210
9208
1600
Che
now
eth,
Har
ry S
M-9
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,32
64,
495,
394
2,68
518
,002
yes
1210
9208
1600
Che
now
eth,
Har
ry S
M-9
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,32
64,
495,
394
2,68
518
,396
.5ye
s
1210
9208
1600
Che
now
eth,
Har
ry S
M-9
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,32
64,
495,
394
2,68
519
,656
yes
1210
9208
1600
Che
now
eth,
Har
ry S
M-9
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,32
64,
495,
394
2,68
520
,966
yes
1210
9208
1600
Che
now
eth,
Har
ry S
M-9
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,32
64,
495,
394
2,68
522
,122
yes
1210
9208
1600
Che
now
eth,
Har
ry S
M-9
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,32
64,
495,
394
2,68
522
,126
yes
1210
9208
1700
Hai
nlin
e, F
red
SM
-11
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,30
74,
496,
660
2,66
618
,351
.3ye
s
1210
9208
1700
Hai
nlin
e, F
red
SM
-11
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,30
74,
496,
660
2,66
618
,854
.1ye
s
1210
9208
1700
Hai
nlin
e, F
red
SM
-11
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,30
74,
496,
660
2,66
620
,146
yes
1210
9208
1700
Hai
nlin
e, F
red
SM
-11
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,30
74,
496,
660
2,66
620
,846
yes
1210
9208
1700
Hai
nlin
e, F
red
SM
-11
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W18
0,30
74,
496,
660
2,66
622
,312
yes
1210
9208
6400
Che
now
eth
SM
-12
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,39
04,
494,
445
2,69
218
,725
.7ye
s
1210
9208
6400
Che
now
eth
SM
-12
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,39
04,
494,
445
2,69
219
,330
yes
1210
9208
6400
Che
now
eth
SM
-12
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,39
04,
494,
445
2,69
219
,431
yes
1210
9208
6400
Che
now
eth
SM
-12
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,39
04,
494,
445
2,69
219
,662
yes
1210
9208
6400
Che
now
eth
SM
-12
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,39
04,
494,
445
2,69
220
,373
yes
1210
9208
6400
Che
now
eth
SM
-12
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,39
04,
494,
445
2,69
220
,577
yes
1210
9208
6400
Che
now
eth
SM
-12
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,39
04,
494,
445
2,69
234
,548
.9ye
s
1210
9208
6500
Che
now
eth
SM
-13
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,79
94,
494,
284
2,70
317
,619
.2ye
s
1210
9208
6500
Che
now
eth
SM
-13
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,79
94,
494,
284
2,70
318
,223
yes
1210
9208
6500
Che
now
eth
SM
-13
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,79
94,
494,
284
2,70
318
,959
yes
1210
9208
6500
Che
now
eth
SM
-13
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,79
94,
494,
284
2,70
319
,102
yes
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 19
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1210
9208
6500
Che
now
eth
SM
-13
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,79
94,
494,
284
2,70
319
,879
yes
1210
9208
6500
Che
now
eth
SM
-13
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,79
94,
494,
284
2,70
320
,457
yes
1210
9208
6500
Che
now
eth
SM
-13
ILM
cDon
ough
56N
3W18
1,79
94,
494,
284
2,70
331
,375
.1ye
s
1210
9209
7100
SM
-16
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,83
44,
496,
736
2,65
418
,702
.5ye
s
1210
9209
7100
SM
-16
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,83
44,
496,
736
2,65
420
,152
yes
1210
9209
7100
SM
-16
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,83
44,
496,
736
2,65
420
,507
yes
1210
9209
7100
SM
-16
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,83
44,
496,
736
2,65
420
,516
yes
1210
9209
7100
SM
-16
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,83
44,
496,
736
2,65
420
,807
yes
1210
9209
7100
SM
-16
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,83
44,
496,
736
2,65
420
,945
yes
1210
9209
7200
SM
-15
ILM
cDon
ough
327N
3W18
0,80
24,
496,
292
2,67
315
,670
yes
1210
9209
7200
SM
-15
ILM
cDon
ough
327N
3W18
0,80
24,
496,
292
2,67
318
,210
yes
1210
9209
7200
SM
-15
ILM
cDon
ough
327N
3W18
0,80
24,
496,
292
2,67
319
,679
yes
1210
9209
7200
SM
-15
ILM
cDon
ough
327N
3W18
0,80
24,
496,
292
2,67
320
,424
yes
1210
9209
7200
SM
-15
ILM
cDon
ough
327N
3W18
0,80
24,
496,
292
2,67
320
,640
yes
1210
9209
7200
SM
-15
ILM
cDon
ough
327N
3W18
0,80
24,
496,
292
2,67
322
,096
yes
1210
9209
7200
SM
-15
ILM
cDon
ough
327N
3W18
0,80
24,
496,
292
2,67
322
,349
yes
1210
9227
3700
Hai
nlin
e, F
red
SM
-17
ILM
cDon
ough
317N
3W17
9,74
24,
495,
293
2,65
619
,433
yes
1210
9227
3800
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tte S
M-1
8IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
568
4,49
4,69
12,
682
16,6
77ye
s
1210
9227
3800
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tte S
M-1
8IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
568
4,49
4,69
12,
682
16,7
07ye
s
1210
9227
3800
Kna
ppen
berg
er, B
urde
tte S
M-1
8IL
McD
onou
gh5
6N3W
180,
568
4,49
4,69
12,
682
21,2
45ye
s
1211
1007
8200
Cry
stal
Lak
e C
ity W
ell
ILM
cHen
ry5
43N
8E39
0,68
24,
677,
355
2,00
028
0no
1211
3005
2800
And
erso
n, J
. #1
ILM
cLea
n31
26N
3E33
7,51
44,
503,
492
3,60
859
,650
no
1211
3005
3300
Funk
#1
ILM
cLea
n19
26N
3E33
7,92
94,
508,
115
3,66
058
,700
yes
1211
3005
3400
Cle
ary,
R. #
1IL
McL
ean
1326
N2E
336,
257
4,50
9,55
83,
759
57,2
00ye
s
1211
3005
3500
Hou
ck #
1IL
McL
ean
1926
N3E
337,
874
4,50
7,64
73,
681
66,3
00ye
s
1211
3005
3600
Furr
ow #
1IL
McL
ean
3026
N3E
337,
511
4,50
5,47
93,
600
59,6
80ye
s
1211
3005
3600
Furr
ow #
1IL
McL
ean
3026
N3E
337,
511
4,50
5,47
93,
600
60,4
00ye
s
1211
3005
5900
And
erso
n, O
. #1
ILM
cLea
n6
25N
3E33
7,59
04,
501,
816
3,71
663
,250
yes
1211
3005
6100
Hitc
h #1
ILM
cLea
n35
26N
2E33
5,37
44,
505,
054
3,61
259
,100
yes
1211
3005
6200
Furr
ow #
2IL
McL
ean
3126
N3E
337,
459
4,50
4,69
43,
564
56,8
00ye
s
1211
3005
6200
Furr
ow #
2IL
McL
ean
3126
N3E
337,
459
4,50
4,69
43,
564
57,6
00ye
s
1211
3005
6200
Furr
ow #
2IL
McL
ean
3126
N3E
337,
459
4,50
4,69
44,
071
59,7
50no
1211
3005
6200
Furr
ow #
2IL
McL
ean
3126
N3E
337,
459
4,50
4,69
44,
071
59,9
20no
20 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1211
3005
6300
Furr
ow #
3IL
McL
ean
3126
N3E
337,
101
4,50
5,04
03,
538
61,1
00ye
s
1211
3005
6400
Pun
ke #
1IL
McL
ean
3226
N3E
339,
053
4,50
4,66
63,
726
60,4
00ye
s
1211
3006
1200
Sch
loss
er #
1IL
McL
ean
3225
N3E
338,
976
4,49
4,31
33,
956
74,4
50ye
s
1211
3006
1600
Car
den
#1IL
McL
ean
1524
N2E
333,
700
4,48
8,95
74,
278
81,6
50no
1211
3006
2600
Ste
phen
s #1
ILM
cLea
n34
25N
2E33
2,15
74,
494,
044
3,88
075
,700
yes
1211
3006
5600
Grim
es #
1IL
McL
ean
124
N2E
335,
420
4,49
3,12
24,
234
77,4
50no
1211
3007
0100
For
tner
#1
ILM
cLea
n36
25N
2E33
5,49
04,
495,
159
3,94
674
,175
yes
1211
3007
1500
Grim
es #
2IL
McL
ean
124
N2E
335,
822
4,49
2,75
43,
794
74,6
50ye
s
1211
3007
1700
Bat
es #
2IL
McL
ean
224
N2E
334,
557
4,49
3,18
14,
135
77,4
50no
1211
3007
1900
Hoo
pes
#1IL
McL
ean
724
N3E
337,
033
4,49
1,21
94,
275
76,2
00no
1211
3007
3800
Ber
enz
#1IL
McL
ean
425
N3E
341,
739
4,50
1,57
83,
796
68,4
80ye
s
1211
3007
4100
Coo
ke #
1IL
McL
ean
1425
N3E
345,
455
4,49
8,76
43,
726
65,4
60no
1211
3007
4200
Pyn
e #1
ILM
cLea
n14
25N
3E34
4,64
34,
498,
874
3,75
265
,220
yes
1211
3007
4200
Pyn
e #1
ILM
cLea
n14
25N
3E34
4,64
34,
498,
874
4,00
267
,790
no
1211
3007
4300
Coo
ke #
3IL
McL
ean
1425
N3E
345,
051
4,49
8,79
64,
231
66,0
00no
1211
3007
4600
Gilm
ore
#1IL
McL
ean
625
N4E
347,
804
4,50
2,78
33,
857
63,6
50ye
s
1211
3007
4700
Sm
ith #
1IL
McL
ean
2025
N4E
349,
575
4,49
6,56
73,
857
64,4
80ye
s
1211
3211
6600
Moo
re #
1IL
McL
ean
2225
N3E
343,
888
4,49
9,66
03,
908
68,4
60ye
s
1213
1000
8400
Ale
do C
ity #
1IL
Mer
cer
1714
N3W
185,
579
4,56
7,92
93,
113
1,67
3ye
s
1213
7003
4601
Whi
tlock
#7-
15IL
Mor
gan
1513
N8W
243,
853
4,38
4,94
34,
100
51,4
61ye
s
1213
7221
3200
Futu
reG
en A
llian
ce #
1IL
Mor
gan
2516
N9W
238,
645
4,41
0,69
34,
048
47,1
00ye
s
1213
7221
3200
Futu
reG
en A
llian
ce #
1IL
Mor
gan
2516
N9W
238,
645
4,41
0,69
34,
048
47,7
00ye
s
1214
1006
8400
Pol
o C
ity W
ell #
1IL
Ogl
e9
23N
8E28
6,43
34,
652,
309
2,10
033
7no
1214
1007
5900
Ore
gon
City
#2
ILO
gle
323
N10
E30
7,05
54,
654,
144
1,20
032
0ye
s
1215
5001
0400
Jone
s &
Lau
ghlin
Ste
el W
D-1
ILP
utna
m3
32N
2W30
4,52
04,
570,
859
4,50
060
,000
no
1215
5001
0400
Jone
s &
Lau
ghlin
Ste
el W
D-1
ILP
utna
m3
32N
2W30
4,52
04,
570,
859
3,10
961
,600
yes
1215
5001
0400
Jone
s &
Lau
ghlin
Ste
el W
D-1
ILP
utna
m3
32N
2W30
4,52
04,
570,
859
3,08
661
,628
yes
1218
3018
4800
Alli
ed C
hem
ical
Cor
p. #
1IL
Ver
mili
on12
19N
11W
452,
323
4,44
2,01
45,
144
172,
000
yes
1218
3018
4800
Alli
ed C
hem
ical
Cor
p. #
1IL
Ver
mili
on12
19N
11W
452,
323
4,44
2,01
44,
864
207,
800
yes
1218
3018
4800
Alli
ed C
hem
ical
Cor
p #1
ILV
erm
ilion
1219
N11
W45
2,32
34,
442,
014
6,00
022
0,00
0ye
s
1219
5001
0300
Fulto
n C
ity W
ell #
3IL
Whi
tesi
de28
22N
3E23
7,32
84,
639,
465
1,94
333
3ye
s
1219
7012
7400
Her
ren,
E.L
. #1
ILW
ill23
36N
9E40
2,99
64,
605,
289
1,95
81,
210
no
1220
1003
0400
City
of R
ockf
ord
#4IL
Win
neba
go34
44N
1E32
6,14
94,
679,
967
1,21
962
4no
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 21
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1220
1003
040
0C
ity o
f Roc
kfor
d #4
ILW
inne
bago
34
44N
1E32
6,14
94,
679,
967
1,21
96
46ye
s
1220
1003
040
0C
ity o
f Roc
kfor
d #4
ILW
inne
bago
34
44N
1E32
6,14
94,
679,
967
1,21
965
8ye
s
1220
1003
040
0C
ity o
f Roc
kfor
d #4
ILW
inne
bago
34
44N
1E32
6,14
94,
679,
967
1,21
966
5ye
s
1220
1003
040
0C
ity o
f Roc
kfor
d #4
ILW
inne
bago
34
44N
1E32
6,14
94,
679,
967
1,21
969
5ye
s
1220
1003
040
0C
ity o
f Roc
kfor
d #4
ILW
inne
bago
34
44N
1E32
6,14
94,
679,
967
1,21
970
6ye
s
1220
1003
920
0W
isc.
Pow
er &
Lig
ht #
3IL
Win
neba
go5
46N
2E33
2,85
64,
705,
698
1,20
031
1ye
s
Nor
ther
n In
dian
a P
ublic
Ser
vice
S-1
06IN
Cas
s14
28N
1W54
2,3
84
4,52
4,89
22,
770
68,
80
0ye
s
Nor
ther
n In
dian
a P
ublic
Ser
vice
S-1
06IN
Cas
s14
28N
1W54
2,3
84
4,52
4,89
22,
802
104,
400
yes
Nor
ther
n In
dian
a P
ublic
Ser
vice
S-1
06IN
Cas
s14
28N
1W54
2,3
84
4,52
4,89
23,
991
124,
200
yes
1174
07P
ensi
nger
#1
INC
lay
3210
N6W
492,
019
4,3
45,7
706,
670
208,
340
yes
1358
95H
oski
n M
fg. W
D-1
INE
lkha
rt21
35N
6E59
6,86
34,
591,
024
3,41
812
3,60
0ye
s
1420
97U
S S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
C-6
5-3
)IN
Lak
e29
37N
8W46
9,40
04,
60
8,11
02,
469
13,1
00
yes
1420
97U
S S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
H-1
91)
INL
ake
2937
N8W
469,
400
4,6
08,
110
2,4
4213
,20
0ye
s
1420
97U
S S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
H-1
88)
INL
ake
2937
N8W
469,
400
4,6
08,
110
2,3
84
91,9
00
yes
1420
97U
S S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
H-1
87)
INL
ake
2937
N8W
469,
400
4,6
08,
110
2,3
84
92,5
00
yes
1420
97U
S S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
H-1
92)
INL
ake
2937
N8W
469,
400
4,6
08,
110
3,28
997
,80
0ye
s
1420
97U
S S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
C-6
5-4
)IN
Lak
e29
37N
8W46
9,40
04,
60
8,11
03,
316
101,
30
0ye
s
1420
97U
S S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
H-1
86)
INL
ake
2937
N8W
469,
400
4,6
08,
110
3,76
612
4,0
00
yes
1420
97U
S S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
C-6
5-5
)IN
Lak
e29
37N
8W46
9,40
04,
60
8,11
03,
793
128,
200
yes
1420
98In
land
Ste
el C
o. W
D-1
(Sam
ple
H-1
95)
INL
ake
1437
N9W
464,
140
4,61
2,07
02,
582
20,1
00
yes
1420
98In
land
Ste
el C
o. W
D-1
(Sam
ple
H-1
96)
INL
ake
1437
N9W
464,
140
4,61
2,07
03,
870
123,
00
0ye
s
143
816
Nor
ther
n In
dian
a P
ublic
Ser
vice
LW
-88/
Am
es #
1IN
Mar
shal
l21
34N
3E56
8,22
74,
581,
707
2,98
23
4,0
00
yes
144
456
Bet
hleh
em S
teel
WP
L-1
INP
orte
r28
37N
6W49
0,0
654,
60
9,17
43,
210
68,1
00
yes
144
456
Bet
hleh
em S
teel
WD
-1 (
Sam
ple
C-6
4-1
INP
orte
r28
37N
6W49
0,0
654,
60
9,17
42,
222
68,3
00
yes
144
456
Bet
hleh
em S
teel
WD
-1IN
Por
ter
2837
N6W
490,
065
4,6
09,
174
2,21
071
,370
yes
144
456
Bet
hleh
em S
teel
WP
L-1
INP
orte
r28
37N
6W49
0,0
654,
60
9,17
43,
210
71,6
00
yes
144
458
Bet
hleh
em S
teel
WD
-2C
(S
ampl
e C
-68
-1)
INP
orte
r29
37N
6W48
8,14
04,
60
8,51
04,
250
98,0
00
yes
144
461
Mid
wes
t Ste
el W
D-1
(Sam
ple
C-6
4-13
)IN
Por
ter
2537
N7
W48
5,74
44,
60
8,6
00
2,16
057
,80
0ye
s
144
461
Mid
wes
t Ste
el W
PL-
1IN
Por
ter
2537
N7
W48
5,74
44,
60
8,6
00
3,50
074
,255
yes
1590
92M
idw
est/U
.S. S
teel
WP
L #2
INP
orte
r25
37N
7W48
5,77
94,
608,
660
2,48
569
,400
yes
22 Circular 582 Illinois State Geological Survey
Wel
l ID
Nam
eS
tate
Co
un
tyS
EC
TW
PR
NG
UT
M16
N
AD
83 X
(m
)U
TM
16
NA
D83
Y (
m)
Dep
th (
ft)
TD
S
(mg
/L)
New
d
ata?
1251
10N
ewpo
rt C
hem
ical
Pla
nt W
D-1
(S
ampl
e C
-60-
24)
INV
erm
illio
n9
16N
9W46
3,82
74,
411,
220
5,45
020
2,10
0ye
s
1251
10N
ewpo
rt C
hem
ical
Pla
nt W
D-1
INV
erm
illio
n9
16N
9W46
3,82
74,
411,
220
5,45
020
4,40
0ye
s
1251
10N
ewpo
rt C
hem
ical
Pla
nt W
D-1
INV
erm
illio
n9
16N
9W46
3,82
74,
411,
220
5,45
023
4,70
0ye
s
1 All
329
sam
ples
wer
e co
llect
ed fr
om w
ells
com
plet
ed in
the
Mt.
Sim
on S
ands
tone
. The
list
is o
rgan
ized
alp
habe
tical
ly b
y st
ate
and
coun
ty a
nd th
en n
umer
ical
ly b
y w
ell I
D. T
he la
st
colu
mn
indi
cate
s w
heth
er th
e T
DS
val
ue w
as n
ew d
ata
com
pile
d fo
r th
is s
tudy
. SE
C =
sec
tion;
TW
P =
tow
nshi
p; R
NG
= r
ange
; UT
M =
Uni
vers
al T
rans
vers
e M
erca
tor;
NA
D =
Nor
th
Am
eric
an D
atum
.
Illinois State Geological Survey Circular 582 23