groundwater flow and transport over larger volumes of rock: cross-hole hydraulic and tracer testing...
TRANSCRIPT
Groundwater Flow and Transport over Larger Volumes of Rock:
Cross-Hole Hydraulicand Tracer Testing
USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock WorkshopEPA Region 2
14 January 2014
Claire Tiedeman and Allen Shapiro, USGS
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 2
Identify flow and transport pathways and barriers between boreholes.
Use of this info with geologic framework helps identify locations of connected high-K fractures and lower-K rocks.
This characterization data is important to developing the site conceptual model.
Quantitative analysis of test data yields estimates of K values.
Purpose of Cross-Hole Hydraulic Testing(also called aquifer testing, pump testing)
FastResponse
NoResponse
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 3
In fractured rocks, hydraulic responses can travel long distances in short times.
Drawdown will not necessarily decrease with distance from pumped well.
Expectations: Cross-Hole Hydraulic Tests
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 4
Well spacings and open intervals Because of high degree of heterogeneity, difficult to predict
distances over which permeable fractures are connected, prior to drilling wells.
Bedding-plane-parting fractures and karst features likely well-connected over longer distances than fractures in crystalline rocks.
Use multiple criteria when selecting locations of new wells – value for characterizing contamination as well as for hydraulic testing.
Multilevel wells important for understanding vertical connections. Testing
Monitor water levels in as many wells as possible. Pump & treat system provides excellent opportunity for using
remediation activities to further characterize hydrogeology.
Designing Hydraulic Tests
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 5
Procedure: Shut down pump in one well of the P&T
system. Monitor water-level rises in obs wells. Start with relatively short tests (run test
during the day, with overnight recovery) Repeat for all wells of system
Advantages No additional contaminated water
withdrawn Relatively short tests limit effect of
shutdown on offsite contaminant migration
Using Existing Pump & Treat System for Cross-Hole Hydraulic Testing
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 6
Well Shutdown Testing in Sedimentary Rocks: An Example
1st Day: Shut down 45BR
2nd Day: Shut down 56BR
3rd Day: Shut down 15BR
rain
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 7
24BR open to bed ‘301’
Well Shutdown Testing in Sedimentary Rocks: An Example
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 8
In heterogeneous fractured rock aquifers, analytical solutions for estimating K or T from hydraulic tests have limited applicability.
Need to use numerical model (e.g. MODFLOW) so that heterogeneity can be properly represented.
Analyzing Cross-Hole Hydraulic Test Data
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 9
Process of developing and calibrating gw flow model helps advance the 3D hydrogeologic conceptual model.
Enables consistent synthesis of site characterization data – geology, geophysics, hydraulics.
Provides a tool for understanding the 3D effects of changes to the flow system, such as increased pumping.
Can be updated as new data collected Starting point for transport modeling
Value of Modeling for Interpreting Hydraulic Test Data
Hydraulic Conductivity Representation
Simulated Drawdown
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 10
Valuable for identifying: Paths for relatively rapid contaminant transport Less permeable volumes of rock where slow advection and
diffusion likely dominate transport Interpreting hydraulic test data:
Incorporate heterogeneity! Use geology! Presence of permeable high-angle fractures might be inferred
from data, but can be difficult to identify their locations Tracer testing provides more definitive characterization
of transport processes
Cross-Hole Hydraulic Tests in Fractured Rocks: Final Thoughts
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 11
Application of Tracers Tests for Decision Making at Sites of
Groundwater Contamination Hydraulic testing monitors fluid pressure responses (hydraulic connections)
Groundwater velocity or processes affecting chemical residence times and chemicaldilution are difficult to infer from hydraulicinformation alone (especially in fractured rock)
If information on residence time and dilution is needed. . . conduct a test that provides a direct measure of these quantities
~ ~
Kv h
n
Groundwater velocity, v Estimates of fracture porosity (n) from mechanical considerations are unreliable Hydraulic conductivity (K) is usually an order of magnitude estimate What are the errors in estimating the hydraulic gradient (Dh) in highly heterogeneous aquifers ?
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 12
Characterizing Residence Time and DilutionDesigning the injection of remediation amendments
CVO
C Co
nc.
(mic
rogr
ams
per L
iter)
Continuous pumping
Feasibility of bioaugmentation in strata between 36BR and 15BR. . .
What is the travel time and dilution from 36BR to 15BR?
Hydraulic communication between monitoring locations is a prerequisite for conducting tracer studies. . .
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 13
135 feet
Bromide concentration - February 2008(7 months after injection)
Tracer injection Pumping
Characterizing Residence Time and DilutionDesigning the injection of remediation amendments
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
co
nc
(m
g/L
)
time (days)
simulated
observed
Simulations demonstrate slow advection (low K) is responsible for mass retention at greater depths in dipping beds
Naval Air Warfare CenterWest Trenton, NJ
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 14
Processes Affecting Chemical MigrationEstimating parameters governing matrix diffusionCharacteristics of breakthrough curves can be used to identify the significance of chemical processes
Simulations for different effective diffusion coefficients
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 15020
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160BRP-03 15BR
Fill
Regolith
FracturedBedrock
InjectWithdraw
AL
TIT
UD
E, I
N F
EE
T
DISTANCE, IN FEET
B B'
Storage of tracer solutions at land surface
BRP3
10-2
10-1
100
101
1 10 100 1000
Bro
mid
e C
once
ntr
atio
n (
mg/
L)
Elapsed Time from Start of Tracer Injection (hours)
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Fra
ctio
n of
Bro
mid
e M
ass
Rec
over
ed
Elapsed time from start of tracer injection (hours)
BRP3
15BR71BR 70BR
25BR
90 ft
TracerInjection Pumping
Bromide Concentration vs. Time at 15BR Bromide Recovery at 15BR
Naval Air Warfare CenterWest Trenton, NJ
Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing 15
Tracer Test Design Tracer tests can be conducted over various distances (provided hydraulic perturbations are observed
between locations)
Single-hole tracer tests can also be designed (point-dilution, push-pull, etc.) Tracer tests can be designed over hours, days, months or years Various types of tracers are available to quantify processes of interest (inert, reactive, varying free-water
diffusion coefficients, dissolved gases, bacteria, colloids, microspheres, etc.) Maintaining the geochemical signature of the ambient groundwater (oxic, anoxic, fluid density) How much tracer mass must be added to register and interpreted a response ? Preliminary estimates of
dilution and attenuation are difficult to derive in fractured rock (In some cases, tracer tests are not run; they are re-run!)
Effect of fluid density in structured media Designing injection apparatus at land surface, and apparatus in injection and monitoring boreholes–
maintaining geochemical conditions of ambient groundwater; volume of fluid in boreholes may be large relative to fracture volume; borehole volume may dilute tracer responses
Tracer arrival at monitoring wells (> 5 km from tracer injection) in the Madison
Limestone
Controls on Fate, Transport, and Remediation of VOCs 16
Final Thoughts
Tracer tests can provide a direct measure of fluid velocity, chemical dilution and attenuation processes
Tracer tests provide valuable information to (1) conceptualize processes affecting fate and transport of contaminants, (2) design and implement remediation strategies
Tracer tests in fractured rock are likely to be successful under hydraulically stressed conditions, provided the hydraulic perturbation can be monitored in cross-hole tests
Single-hole tracer tests are used primarily to estimate in situ process and identify local parameter values. . .less reliable in estimating groundwater velocity