green movement - wordpress.com · green movement a mcdonald’s sustainability project vin...
TRANSCRIPT
Green Movement
A McDonald’s
Sustainability Project
Vin Sathyamoorthy
Mitch Daar
Yousef Shaban
Sahand Sepehrnia
November 14, 2012
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Challenge Contents
Client and Context
Methodology
Step 1: Initial Observations
Step 2: Customer Segmentation
Step 3: Detailed Observations & Key Insights
Step 4: Concept
Business Case Analysis
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Problem Statement
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
• People want to get in and get out
quickly (“To go”)
• Fast & easy lots of prepackaged
goods (creates excess waste)
• Customers are accustomed to a certain
way of disposing waste – single dump
into trash, no sorting
Challenges with Sustainability
It appears as if there is a
fundamental disconnect
between what McDonald’s can
do well and what they can do sustainably.
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Challenge Contents
Client and Context
Methodology
Step 1: Initial Observations
Step 2: Customer Segmentation
Step 3: Detailed Observations & Key Insights
Step 4: Concept
Business Case Analysis
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Methodology
Step 1
Our team followed a four-step process in deriving a solution.
Step 2 Step 3 Step 4
Visit McDonald’s and observe
patrons
Identify & define
customer segments
Target a segment and observe them
further
Develop a solution to
address target’s needs
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Challenge Contents
Client and Context
Methodology
Step 1: Initial Observations
Step 2: Customer Segmentation
Step 3: Detailed Observations & Key Insights
Step 4: Concept
Business Case Analysis
Our team visited several McDonald’s
locations to observe customers.
From these initial observations and interviews, we identified
key customer segments who dine in at McDonald’s
regularly, and studied their habits.
From these initial observations and interviews, we identified
key customer segments who dine in at McDonald’s
regularly, and studied their habits.
Hourly Workers Wi-Fi
Users
Families
Retirees
Teenagers
Teenagers Hourly
Workers Families Wi-Fi Users Retirees
Description Teenagers on
their way to/from
school
Workers (typically
hourly) on their
lunch break
Parents and kids
sitting down for a
family meal,
typically after an
activity (e.g.
soccer game)
Customers who
come to McD’s to
use free Wi-Fi
service
60 and older
males who are
retired from work
Core
Attitude
Need inexpensive
consistent food
Need to escape
the office to relax
and eat an
affordable meal
Need an easy
place to get a
meal and sit
down between
activities
Need a substitute
for Starbucks;
customers come
alone to do work
Need a spot to
socialize with
friends, as well as
to casually read
the newspaper
Order Type Value menu Full meal (burger,
fries, soft drink)
Meal for parents;
happy meal for
kids
McCafe McCafe,
sometimes
accompanied
with salad
Time at
Restaurant
30-45 minutes 30-40 minutes 30-40 minutes 45 – 60 minutes 60+ minutes
What do these customers want out of McDonald’s?
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Key Takeaways
Waste Produced
• Waste common amongst all patrons –
cups (McCafes, Smoothies, Soft Drinks)
• Customers throw away their soda cups
with the liquid & ice (contaminates trash
bag)
• Everybody wants to throw away trash
quickly – even people who have spent a
large amount of time at McDonald’s
(applies to retirees, kids, etc.) 10-15% % of total restaurant
waste made up of plastic products
(polystyrene, polypropylene)
45-60% % of total restaurant
waste made up of paper products –
translates to about 2.5 tons/month
Cups are a major source of
waste across all customer
segments.
Children are more willing to
try new activities that
promote sustainability.
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Challenge Contents
Client and Context
Methodology
Step 1: Initial Observations
Step 2: Customer Segmentation
Step 3: Detailed Observations & Key Insights
Step 4: Concept
Business Case Analysis
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Observation Subjects
Anu Uzma
Ayana Age 7
Yuvan Age 5
Armaan Age 3
“Can I play with your iPhone?”
“I want to show you my new
toys!”
“I want to do a puzzle!”
“Use your imagination … pretend we have it!”
“George needs his shots … you can be
the doctor giving it to him.”
“I like to play tennis … and with my golf club.”
Key Insights
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Challenge Contents
Client and Context
Methodology
Step 1: Initial Observations
Step 2: Customer Segmentation
Step 3: Detailed Observation & Key Insights
Step 4: Concept
Business Case Analysis
We have the opportunity to
motivate kids to recycle, while
playing a game
Happy Meal Box • Instantly recognizable by kids
• Iconic house shaped box (roof comes together in point)
• Golden arches on top – “handle”
Our solution is a simple game that is designed to provide
high replay value by being easy to learn, but hard to
master.
“Wooosh!” Game • Shaped like a Happy Meal box; kids
immediately drawn to its presence
• Golden arches are actually tubes that carry cups
Cup gets sucked through pipe, traveling to top
Kid inserts cup here; it enters pneumatic tube, similar to those at bank drive-thru windows
Sucking motion removes liquid and dries out cup as it travels up
Cup bounces around Happy Meal toys, awarding points (like a pinball machine)
Cups Only, Please! Dump any remaining liquid here first
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Challenge Contents
Client and Context
Methodology
Step 1: Initial Observations
Step 2: Customer Segmentation
Step 3: Detailed Observations & Key Insights
Step 4: Concept
Business Case Analysis
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Analysis of “Wooosh!”
Considerations Solutions Benefits
Initial R&D and Machine Costs
Cross-promote with Hi-C brands and happy meal toy manufacturers
Break-even faster with constant revenue stream
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Analysis of “Wooosh!”
Considerations Solutions Benefits
Initial R&D and Machine Costs
Cross-promote with Hi-C brands and happy meal toy manufacturers
Break-even faster with constant revenue stream
Possibility of contamination
Target only cups, liquid separation, upward “woosh” to eliminate residue liquid
Reliable Recyclable Waste; Limit leakage of trash bags
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Analysis of “Wooosh!”
Considerations Solutions Benefits
Initial R&D and Machine Costs
Cross-promote with Hi-C brands and happy meal toy manufacturers
Break-even faster with constant revenue stream
Possibility of contamination
Target only cups, liquid separation, upward “woosh” to eliminate residue liquid
Reliable Recyclable Waste; Limit leakage of trash bags
Trash Volume Compact cups by up to 8x
Smaller trash volume = Fewer trips to empty trash; Reduce waste management pickups
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12
In-Store Revenues
Revenues from Beverages $21,408 $21,496 $21,584 $21,673 $21,761 $21,850 $21,939 $22,028 $22,117 $22,207 $22,296 $22,386
Revenues from Non-Beverages 43,815 43,833 43,851 43,869 43,887 43,905 43,923 43,941 43,959 43,977 43,995 44,014
Total In-Store Revenues 65,222 65,328 65,435 65,541 65,648 65,755 65,862 65,969 66,077 66,184 66,292 66,399
Incremental Revenue (Total - Original) - 106 213 319 426 533 640 747 854 962 1,069 1,177
Cross-Promotional Revenue with Coca-Cola 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Money from Recycled Paper 2 4 7 9 11 13 16 18 20 22 25 27
Total Incremental Revenue 1,002 1,111 1,219 1,328 1,437 1,546 1,655 1,765 1,874 1,984 2,094 2,204
Cumulative Incremental Revenue 1,002 2,113 3,332 4,660 6,097 7,644 9,299 11,064 12,938 14,922 17,016 19,220
Cumulative Incremental Revenue Excluding Sales Increase 1,002 2,007 3,013 4,022 5,033 6,047 7,063 8,080 9,100 10,123 11,147 12,174
Costs
Machine Costs $3,000 - - - - - - - - - - -
R&D: Machine 356 - - - - - - - - - - -
Cleaning Costs 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Incremental Utility Cost 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Reduction: in Waste Management Fees (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19) (19)
Reduction: Employee Wages (4) (8) (12) (15) (19) (23) (27) (31) (35) (38) (42) (46)
Total Costs 3,408 48 44 40 36 32 28 25 21 17 13 9
Cumulative Costs 3,408 3,455 3,499 3,539 3,575 3,607 3,636 3,660 3,681 3,698 3,711 3,720
Cumulative Gains (Revenues - Costs) (2,406) (1,342) (167) 1,121 2,522 4,036 5,663 7,404 9,257 11,225 13,306 15,501
Cumulative Gains Excluding Sales Increase (2,406) (1,449) (486) 483 1,458 2,440 3,427 4,420 5,420 6,425 7,437 8,454
Kellogg Design Challenge | Green Movement | November 14, 2012
Break-Even Analysis
Assumes: (1) Beverage Rev. incr. by 3.8%/annum & (2) Non-
Beverage Rev incr. 10% of Bev.
Break-Even: Assuming No Increased Sales Revenue
i’m lovin’ it