grand tetons reactive nitrogen deposition study (grandtrends) · 2 • satellite view of ammonia...
TRANSCRIPT
Grand Tetons Reactive Nitrogen Deposition Study (GrandTReNDS)
Field Study & Data Analysis: K.B. Benedict1, E.J.T. Levin1, D. Day2, A.P. Sullivan1, Y. Li1, X. Chen1, T. Lee1, Y. Desyaterik1, M. Schurman1, S.M.
Kreidenweis1, J.L. Collett Jr. 1 Data Analysis & Source Apportionment: B.A. Schichtel3, T. Thomson, M.
Barna3, K. Gebhart3, W.C. Malm2
Planning: E. Porter, T. Blett, Sue O’Ney, Targhee personnel and others
1CSU Atmospheric Chemistry Department; 2CIRA; 3NPS
Sources of Reduced and Oxidized Gases
Vegetation; Wildfire Feedlots, Prescribed fires Organic N
Wild animals – Ecosystem respiration; Wildfire
Feedlots; Fertilizer; Mobile Waste water treatment; Fire
NH3 NH4
Soil Release; Lightning; Wildfire
Fossil-Fuel Combustion (power plants; mobile; oil and gas) Fertilizer, Prescribed fire
NO2 NO3 Naturally Occurring Anthropogenic Compound
Nitrogen Sources NH3 Emissions
GRTE could be influenced by: Agricultural to the west Urban (Jackson, Salt Lake) Oil and gas to the southeast Fires Natural sources, e.g. soil and vegetation
Fire CO Emissions
NO Emissions
Satellite View of NH3 and NO2
• Satellite view of ammonia hotspots (Clarisse et al. 2009). Note the high NH3 in the Snake River Valley and northern Utah
Satellite view of August 2006 NO2 hotspots (Duncan et al., 2010). NOx Urban areas and large power plants are visible.
NH3 NO2
Nitrogen Deposition near GRTE Yellowstone: 2008-2010 Pinedale: 2008-2010
• Of the species measured, wet deposition of NO3- and NH4
+ dominates throughout the year.
• Wet NH4+ > NO3
- at Yellowstone (North of Tetons) Wet NH4+ ~ NO3
- at Pinedale (Southeast)
• Dry NH3 and wet and dry organic N is missing
Wet Reduced vs. Oxidized, NADP • Over the last 25 years have
moved from an oxidized N to Reduced N dominated wet N
• At Pinedale and Yellowstone oxidized ~ reduced
• Sources of interest are moving from fossil fuel combustion to agriculture
Percent Contribution from Wet NH4
NOx and NH3 U.S. Emissions: 2006 verse 2050 Projection
• It is projected that the U.S. will shift from oxidized dominated to reduced dominated RN emissions by 2050
Raluca Ellis et al., 2012
GrandTReNDS Primary Objectives Characterize the atmospheric concentrations and deposition levels
of reactive nitrogen species in gaseous, particulate and aqueous phases on the east and west of Grand Teton
Identify the relative contributions to reactive nitrogen deposition in
GRTE from within the states of Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana versus
other states, from west: Snake River Valley and northern Utah; southeast:
Sublette County, Wyoming; and within GRTE. from source categories: agricultural, mobile, wild and
prescribed fires, and large and small point sources.
Craters of the Moon NADP, AMoN
Yellowstone: NADP, CASTNet
Pinedale: NADP, CASTNet
Gypsum Creek: NADP
Driggs (DR)
Grand Teton Reactive Nitrogen Deposition Study Region
Study Period: April- September 2011 High elevation sites: Late July-September 2011 Grand Targee Core Site: August-September 2011 NOAA Climate Center Core Sites: May – September 2011
Daily URG Daily HiVol Precipitation Met Station Passive NH3
Precipitation Passive NH3
Passive NH3
Passive NH3 (2 week and 4 week)
Grand Targhee Resort Daily URG Daily HiVol Precipitation Met Station Passive PILS Gas Rack Sizing Rack AMS Driggs Daily URG Precipitation Passive NH3 Met. Station
Selected Sites
Precipitation Collection Met Station
URG
AMS, PILS, Gas Rack, Sizing Rack, MOUDI
HiVol
Weekly NH3 Passive
Grand Targhee Driggs, ID (west)
GTNP East: NOAA Climate Center
Atmospheric Concentrations
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0 N
H3
(µg/
m3 )
Driggs
Lower Grand Targhee NOAA Climate Center Upper Grand Targhee
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
HN
O3
(µg/
m3 )
HNO3
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
NH
4+ (µ
g/m
3 ) NH4
+
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
1-A
pr
15-A
pr
29-A
pr
3-M
ay
27-M
ay
10-J
un
24-J
un
8-Ju
l
22-J
ul
5-A
ug
19-A
ug
2-Se
p
16-S
ep
30-S
ep
NO
3-
(µg/
m3 )
NO3-
NH3
West-to-east NH3 gradient
GTNP Site Comparison
• The relative importance of N deposition pathways depends on the amount of precipitation (DR v GT).
• Dry deposition of ammonia is important in GTNP.
Dry NH4 2%
Dry NO3 0%
Dry HNO3
6%
Dry NH3 54%
Wet ON 4%
Wet NH4 20%
Wet NO3 14%
Driggs: July 27 - Sept. 21
Dry NH4 2%
Dry NO3 0%
Dry HNO3
7%
Dry NH3 26%
Wet ON 16%
Wet NH4 31%
Wet NO3 18%
GT: July 27 - Sept. 21 Dry NH4 2%
Dry NO3 0%
Dry HNO3
6%
Dry NH3 28%
Wet ON 16%
Wet NH4 29%
Wet NO3 19%
NC: July 27- Sept. 21
Summer Reactive Nitrogen Deposition at Rocky Mtn and Grand Teton
• Only includes periods when particle organic nitrogen was measured • Missing gas phase organic nitrogen
RMNP GTNP Dry
NH4 2%
Dry NO3 1%
Dry HNO3
5%
Wet NO3 20%
Wet NH4 37%
Wet ON 17%
Dry ON 1%
Dry NH3 17%
Dry NH4 2%
Dry NO3 0%
Dry HNO3
7%
Wet NO3 19%
Wet NH4 32% Wet ON
11%
Dry ON 1%
Dry NH3 28%
GrandTReNDS
Ongoing NH3 Measurements Much higher concentrations in 2012
Chemical Transport Modeling: CAMx • PM source apportionment
tool (PSAT) • Tags emissions from defined
source regions and tracks their transport, deposition and transformation through the atmosphere and to the receptor sites
• ROMANS II – Rocky Mountain NP reactive nitrogen assessment, Nov 2008 – Nov ’09 • PSAT was run for 22 source regions including boundary conditions • Apportioned ambient ammonia
Grand Teton: Grand Targhee %
Con
tribu
tion
to
Ambi
ent A
mm
onia
Grand Teton: NOAA Climate Center %
Con
tribu
tion
to
Ambi
ent A
mm
onia
Future Source Apportionment Work • Two air quality modeling efforts are underway
• WestJump Air Quality Modeling Study • Three State data warehouse/modeling study
• Emission and Meteorological input fields for 2011 should be ready in 3-6 months
• These inputs will be used to generate reactive nitrogen source attribution estimates for the GrandTReNDS projects using both forward and hybrid receptor models.