grand renewable energy park - draft project description

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK

- DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION

REPORT – VERSION 2

File No. 160960577

June 2010

Prepared for:

Samsung Renewable Energy Inc.

55 Standish Court

Mississauga, ON L5R 4B2

Prepared by:

Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Suite 1 - 70 Southgate Drive

Guelph ON N1G 4P5

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK - DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORT – VERSION 2

i

Table of Contents

1.0 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................. 1.1

1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 1.1

1.2 CONTACTS.................................................................................................................. 1.2

1.3 AUTHORIZATIONS REQUIRED .................................................................................. 1.2

1.3.1 Provincial............................................................................................................ 1.2

1.3.2 Municipal ............................................................................................................ 1.3

1.3.3 Federal Involvement ........................................................................................... 1.4

2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 2.1

2.1 ENERGY SOURCES .................................................................................................... 2.1

2.2 LAND OWNERSHIP ..................................................................................................... 2.1

2.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS .......................................................................................... 2.1

2.3.1 Wind Turbine Generators ................................................................................... 2.1

2.3.2 Solar Panels ....................................................................................................... 2.1

2.3.3 Electrical Interconnection ................................................................................... 2.1

2.3.4 Access Laneways ............................................................................................... 2.2

2.3.5 Operations and Maintenance Building ................................................................ 2.2

2.4 PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................ 2.2

2.5 PROJECT ACTIVIES ................................................................................................... 2.3

2.5.1 Waste Generation and Emissions ...................................................................... 2.4

2.5.2 Hazardous Materials .......................................................................................... 2.4

2.5.3 Sewage and Stormwater Management ............................................................... 2.5

2.5.4 Water-taking Activities ........................................................................................ 2.5

3.0 DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ................................. 3.1

3.1 PROJECT RELATED SETBACKS ............................................................................... 3.1

4.0 CLOSURE .................................................................................................................... 4.1

List of Tables

Table 1.1 Project Description Report Contents ....................................................................... 1.1Table 1.2 Key Provincial Permits and Authorizations .............................................................. 1.3Table 1.3 Key Municipal Permits and Authorizations .............................................................. 1.3Table 1.4 Key Federal Permits and Authorizations ................................................................. 1.4Table 2.1 Project Schedule Overview ..................................................................................... 2.2Table 2.2 Key Project Activities .............................................................................................. 2.3


Table of Contents

ii

List of Appendices

Appendix A Project Location and Study Area

Appendix B Turbine Specifications

Appendix C Environmental Features Screening Checklist


1.1

1.0 Overview

This document provides a preliminary description of the proposed Grand Renewable Energy

Park (the Project). This Project Description Report has been written in accordance with Ontario

Regulation 359/09 (Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Act) under the

Environmental Protection Act. The information provided herein, and its location within the

document is as follows:

Table 1.1 Project Description Report Contents

Content Location within Project Description Report

1. Any energy sources to be used to generate electricity at the renewable energy generation facility.

Section 2.1

2. The facilities, equipment or technology that will be used to convert the renewable energy source or any other energy source to electricity.

Section 2.2

3. If applicable, the class of the renewable energy generation facility.

Section 2.3

4. The activities that will be engaged in as part of the renewable energy project.

Section 2.4

5. The name plate capacity of the renewable energy generation facility.

Section 2.5

6. The ownership of the land on which the project location is to be situated

Section 2.6

7. Any negative environmental effects that may result from engaging in the project.

Section 3.0 and Appendix C

8. An unbound, well marked, legible and reproducible map that is an appropriate size to fit on a 215 millimetre by 280 millimetre page, showing the project location and the land within 300 metres of the project location.

Appendix A

1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION

The Project is known as the Grand Renewable Energy Park and consists of a 140 MW

(nameplate capacity) wind project and a 100 MW (nameplate capacity) solar project. The

Project will be entirely located within Haldimand County in south-western Ontario. A map

showing the location of the project is provided in Appendix A.

The Project area consists of flat, gently rolling farmland. It is generally bounded by i) Haldimand

Concession 11 W-1 to the North; ii) Haldimand Road 55 to the West; iii) the Grand River to the

East; and iv) Lake Erie to the South. Settlements in the general vicinity of the Project include

Selkirk, Fisherville, South Cayuga, and Byng. Selkirk Provincial Park and James N. Allan

Provincial Park are also located in the general vicinity of the Project. The Canada Land

Inventory (CLI) classifications for the Project Location have also been identified within

Appendix A.

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK - DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORT – VERSION 2 Overview

June 2010

1.2

1.2 CONTACTS

The proponent for the Project is Samsung Renewable Energy Inc. (“Samsung”). Samsung’s

office and contact for the Project is:

Name: Adam Rosso

Title: Manager, Business Development

Company: Samsung Renewable Energy Inc.

Address: 55 Standish Court

Mississauga, ON L5R 4B2

The lead consultant for preparation of the Renewable Energy Approval (REA) application is

Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”). Stantec provides professional consulting services in

planning, engineering, architecture, interior design, landscape architecture, surveying,

environmental sciences, project management, and project economics for infrastructure and

facilities projects. The consultant’s office and Project contact is:

Name: Rob Nadolny

Title: Senior Project Manager

Company: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Address: Suite 1 - 70 Southgate Drive

Guelph, ON N1G 4P5

Project Email: [email protected]

Project Telephone: (877) 536-6050 or 519-836-6050 (collect)

1.3 AUTHORIZATIONS REQUIRED

1.3.1 Provincial

According to subsections 4.(3) and 6.(3) of the Regulation, the proposed solar project is a Class

3 Solar Facility and the wind project is a Class 4 Wind Facility. As agreed upon with the Ministry

of the Environment, one REA Application will be submitted for the Project consisting of

information related to both the wind and solar projects. In return, two separate Renewable

Energy Approvals are being sought, one for the wind project and one for the solar project.

At the provincial level there are multiple permits and approvals that may be required to facilitate

the development of the Project, in addition to the REA. Their ultimate applicability will be

determined during the REA process and based upon the Project’s detailed design. The following

is a list of key permits and approvals that may be required; however additional permits may also

be required.


June 2010

1.3

Table 1.2 Key Provincial Permits and Authorizations

Key Permit / Authorization

Administering Agency Rationale

Approval of Connection IESO Electrical interconnect with IESO regulated network

Connection Assessment IESO Integration of project with IESO-controlled transmission system

Customer Impact Assessment

Hydro One Networks Inc. (HONI) Integration of project with Hydro One and effects to customers

Connection Cost Recovery Agreement (CCRA)

HONI Recovery of costs to grid operator of changes to allow connection

System Impact Assessment IESO Integration of project with IESO-controlled transmission system

Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Permit

Grand River Conservation Authority and Long Point Conservation Authority

Work within floodplains, water crossings, river or stream valleys, hazardous lands and within or adjacent to wetlands. Projects requiring review, Fisheries Act authorization and/or assessment under the Canadian

Environmental Assessment Act are forwarded to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO)

Certificate of Inspection Electrical Safety Authority (ESA) A record that electrical work complies with the requirements of the Ontario Electrical Safety Code.

Generator’s License Ontario Energy Board (OEB) Generation of electrical power for sale to grid

Leave to Construct OEB Authorization to construct power transmission lines

Notice of Project Ministry of Labour Notify the Ministry of Labour before construction begins.

Special vehicle configuration permit

Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Use of non-standard vehicles to transport large components

Transportation Plan MTO Adherence to road safety and suitability

Highway Entrance Permit MTO Entrance permit for new or upgraded road entrances onto a provincial highway

Interference or obstruction of the highway

Change of Access and Heavy/Oversize Load Transportation Permit

MTO Compliance with provincial highway traffic and road safety regulations

Wide or excess load permit MTO Transportation of large or heavy items on provincial highways

1.3.2 Municipal

Several permits and authorizations may also be required from Haldimand County (Table 1.3).

Table 1.3 Key Municipal Permits and Authorizations

Key Permit / Authorization Rationale

Municipal Consent, Work with the R.O.W

Required for works in municipal road allowances

Consent/Severance Application Required if easements over private lands required

Road Cut Permit May be required for access roads off of county roads or works to county roads

Pre-Condition Survey Assessment of pre-construction conditions for engineering staff


June 2010

1.4

Table 1.3 Key Municipal Permits and Authorizations

Key Permit / Authorization Rationale

Building Permit Compliance with building codes

Entrance Permit Entrance from county roads

Transportation Plan Adherence to road safety and suitability

Additional Plans related to general engineering (e.g. siltation control, lot grading, plan of services, etc.), water, wastewater, storm water, transportation, and geotechnical

Required supporting information/plans required by Haldimand County

1.3.3 Federal Involvement

It is expected that a Federal Screening report will not be required for the Project, as it is not

anticipated that it will cause a ‘trigger’ under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act

(CEAA), such as a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction of fish habitat under the

Fisheries Act, or application for project funding under a future program similar to ecoEnergy for

Renewable Power. However, the agency consultation program for the Project will include all

federal departments and agencies typically interested in wind power projects (e.g., Department

of National Defense, Environmental Canada, Transport Canada, etc.). All required federal

permits and approvals required for the Project will be determined during the REA process, but

may include those listed in Table 1.4.

Table 1.4 Key Federal Permits and Authorizations

Permit / Authorization Administering Agency Rationale

Aeronautical Obstruction Clearance Transport Canada – Aviation Division Turbine lighting and marking

Land Use Clearance NavCanada Aeronautical safety mapping and designations

Navigational Clearance Transport Canada – Marine Division Crossing a navigable watercourse


2.1

2.0 Project Information

2.1 ENERGY SOURCES

The Grand Renewable Energy Park will utilize wind and sunlight as sources of energy for the

Project.

2.2 LAND OWNERSHIP

The Project will be located on privately owned and Ontario Realty Corporation (ORC) managed

lands within Haldimand County. The land that will be utilized by the Project is shown in the

Project map (Appendix A). The legal description of the parcels of land that will be used for

Project will be provided as part of the REA application.

2.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS

This section provides a general description of the major equipment and infrastructure

associated with operation of the Project. The preliminary project description provided in this

document will be refined and finalized as Samsung proceeds through the REA process.

2.3.1 Wind Turbine Generators

The specific make and model of wind turbines to be used as part of the wind component of the

Project are being finalized. They are expected to be approximately 2.2 to 2.3 MW each

(nameplate capacity) for a total of 140 MW (nameplate capacity) and comprising of

approximately 63 turbines. Hub height will be approximately 100 metres, with a rotor diameter of

approximately 101 metres.

A more detailed description of the turbines is provided in Appendix B.

2.3.2 Solar Panels

The panels to be used as part of the solar component of the solar component of the Project are

being finalized. They will consist of photovoltaic (PV) panels installed on fixed ground-mounted

racking structures. The solar portion of the Project will have a nameplate capacity of 100 MW.

A more detailed description of the panels will be provided at a later date once the solar

components are finalized.

2.3.3 Electrical Interconnection

Depending on the turbine model, a transformer (approximately 1.5 cubic metres) may be sited

within approximately 3 m of the base of each tower. The transformer will be connected to the

wind project’s collection system, which will transport electricity to the Project’s transformer

substation.

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK - DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORT – VERSION 2 Project Information

June 2010

2.2

Similar to the wind turbine generators, the electrical output of the solar panels will be

transformed to distribution voltage levels and connected to the Project’s substation via the solar

project’s collector system.

The substation will transform the distribution voltage of the Project’s collection system to 230 kV

such that it can be tied in to the provincial electricity grid operated by Hydro One Networks Inc.

The substation will be operated, monitored and controlled 24-hours a day via a

telecommunication system. To facilitate the Project’s connection to the provincial grid, a new 30

km long (approximate) 230 kV transmission line will be constructed as part of the project. The

configuration and route for the power line will be determined as part of the REA process.

2.3.4 Access Laneways

Existing provincial and municipal roads will be used to transport project-related components,

equipment and personnel to the project area. The Project will be installed on a combination of

private and ORC-managed lands. Access to these lands will be required for installation and

operation of the wind turbines and solar panels. Because of the current farming activity in the

area, numerous agricultural laneways are present in the vicinity of the Project. These existing

laneways will be utilized where possible. New laneways will be constructed as required to

provide access to the individual turbine sites and solar PV panels. Permanent access laneways

will be approximately 4 metres wide.

2.3.5 Operations and Maintenance Building

Associated with the Project will be an operations and maintenance building. This facility will

provide warehouse and workshop spaces, administrative office and telecommunications areas,

equipment storage and security facilities as required.

2.4 PROJECT SCHEDULE

The table below provides an overview of the projected dates associated with the Project.

Table 2.1 Project Schedule Overview

Milestone Approximate Date

Initiate Public REA Process June 2010

REA technical studies Ongoing through to December 2010

Public Open House #1 July 2010

Draft REA Reports to Public October 2010

Public Open House #2 December 2010

REA Approval April 2011

Start of Construction April 2011

Commercial Operation Date (COD) December 2012 – March 2013

Repowering/Decommissioning 2037 (approximately 25 years after COD)


June 2010

2.3

2.5 PROJECT ACTIVIES

A general overview of the activities during construction, operation, and decommissioning

phases of the Project are provided below.

Table 2.2 Key Project Activities

Project Phase Activities

Construction Turbine and Solar Sites

Delineation of temporary work areas

Access road construction

Completion of necessary site grading

Installation of tower and panel foundations

Installation of crane pads

Tower/turbine erection and panel installation

Installation of step-up transformer and required wiring

Installation of collector lines, usually parallel to access roads

Reclamation of temporary work areas

Site landscaping (final grading, topsoil replacement, etc.)

Substation Site

Preparation of laydown area

Installation of substation and connection with grid

Construction of operations and maintenance building

Reclamation of temporary work areas

Off-Site Activities

Installation of collector lines and transmission line in municipal road right of way

Operation Turbine and Solar Sites

Preventative maintenance

Unplanned maintenance

Meter calibrations

Grounds keeping

Substation Site

Preventative maintenance for substation

Unplanned maintenance for substation

Remote wind farm condition monitoring

Operations and maintenance building maintenance

Off-Site Activities

Electrical line maintenance

Decommissioning Turbine and Solar Sites

Removal of turbine and solar panel infrastructure

Removal of step-up transformer

Site grading (dependent upon new proposed use)

Possible removal of access roads dependent upon agreement with property owner

Possible excavation and removal of collector lines depending upon agreement with property owner

Off-Site Activities

Possible removal of collector system and transmission line in municipal right of way (remove wires


June 2010

2.4

Table 2.2 Key Project Activities

Project Phase Activities

and poles)

Disconnection of substation from provincial grid

Removal of substation

Removal of operation and maintenance building, dependent upon agreement with property owner

2.5.1 Waste Generation and Emissions

Waste Generation

During construction, waste material produced by the Project is expected to consist of

construction material (e.g., excess fill/soil, scrap lumber, banding, plastic wrap removed from

palletized goods, etc.) and a minor amount of domestic waste. Similar waste material may be

generated during decommissioning.

During operation, the Operation and Maintenance Building will produce waste materials typical

of an office setting, including recyclables and domestic waste. In addition, there will be waste

generated as a result of ongoing maintenance activities (e.g., used lubricants and oils).

All wastes will be handled and recycled or disposed of in accordance with regulatory

requirements. Further details on waste management and disposal will be developed during the

REA process.

Emissions

During construction, dust and acoustic emissions will be generated as a result of operating

heavy equipment and due to construction related traffic and various construction activities (e.g.,

excavation, grading, etc.). Similar emissions may be expected during decommissioning.

During operation, air emissions will be restricted to the operation of maintenance vehicles and

the heating of the operation and maintenance building. Acoustic emissions from the Project

(turbines, transformers and substation) will be assessed in detail during the REA process. All

emissions will be managed within the limits set by regulatory requirements.

2.5.2 Hazardous Materials

Hazardous materials on-site are limited to fuel, lubricating oils, and other fluids associated with

project construction, maintenance and operation. These materials are contained within Project

components and/or the maintenance/control building. Typical containment facilities and

emergency response materials will be maintained on-site as required. Disposal of any

hazardous materials will be in accordance with regulatory requirements. The process for final

disposal of any hazardous waste will be developed during the REA process.


June 2010

2.5

2.5.3 Sewage and Stormwater Management

Sanitary waste generated by the construction crew will be collected via portable toilets and

wash stations supplied by the construction contractor. Disposal of these wastes will be the

responsibility of the contracted party and will be done in accordance with regulatory

requirements.

To support the operations and maintenance building, a septic system and water well will likely

need to be installed. This system will be designed to the standard specifications for the area as

defined by the MOE and/or County. More detailed information on the water well and septic

system will be provided later in the REA process.

Stormwater management works may be required in association with the Operations and

Maintenance building and substation. The specific requirement for these works will be assessed

during the REA process.

2.5.4 Water-taking Activities

Depending on groundwater levels, some dewatering activities may be required during turbine

foundation excavation; however withdrawal amounts are anticipated to be below 50,000 l/d.

More information on water-taking activities will be provided later in the REA process.


3.1

3.0 Description of Potential Environmental Effects

The effects of constructing, operating, and maintaining a renewable energy facility is well

understood and can be typically mitigated through well known and accepted techniques and

practices. For example, siting infrastructure outside of wetlands and away from residential

(sound) receptors reduces the potential for negative environmental effects.

A screening of environmental features was undertaken on potential issues and effects relevant

to the Project (see Appendix C). Based upon the above screening of environmental features,

experience gained as part Project planning, and the requirements of the REA process, the

following Project-specific issues and potential effects have been identified and are expected to

be further analysed as part of the REA application process:

• Heritage and Archaeological Resources

• Natural Heritage Resources

• Water Bodies

• Air, Odour, Dust

• Environmental Noise

• Land Use and Resources

• Provincial and Local Infrastructure

• Public Health and Safety

Detailed descriptions of the potential effects, mitigation measures, and net effects to these

features during the construction, operation, and decommissioning phases of the Project will be

provided in the REA application and summarized in the final Project Description Report.

3.1 PROJECT RELATED SETBACKS

A key component of the REA process is the establishment of common setbacks for all

renewable energy facilities in the Province. Where Project related infrastructure will be located

within the setbacks, additional analysis (i.e., Environmental Impact Study) will be provided in the

REA application and summarized in the final Project Description Report. Based on information

available at the time of writing, setbacks to be utilized have been mapped on the Project

Location Map (Appendix A); however some of the setbacks (e.g., non-participating receptors,

significant wildlife habitat, etc.) have not yet been mapped as site investigations and other

analyses have not yet been completed to confirm the locations of the features.

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK - DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORT – VERSION 2 Description of Potential Environmental Effects

June 2010

3.2

Key setbacks which will be applied throughout the design of the Project are as follows:

Feature Setback Distance Study Alternative When Within Setback

Non-participating receptor 550 m (from turbine

base)

An Environmental Noise Impact Assessment will

be completed for the Project according to MOE

Noise Guidelines.

Public road right-of-way and

railway right-of-way

Turbine blade

length + 10 m (from

turbine base)

N/A

Property line Turbine height

(excluding blades)

(from turbine base)

Does not apply to parcels of land if the abutting

parcel of land is a participant in the Project or if it

is demonstrated that the wind turbine will not

result in adverse impacts on nearby business,

infrastructure, properties or land use activities.

Provincially significant southern

wetland

120 m Development not permitted within feature.

Development and site alteration may be possible

within setback area; EIS required.

Provincially significant ANSI

(Earth Science)

50 m Development and site alteration may be possible

within natural feature and setback area; EIS

required.

Provincially significant ANSI

(Life Science)

120 m Development and site alteration may be possible


required.

Significant valleyland 120 m Development and site alteration may be possible


required.

Significant woodland 120 m Development and site alteration may be possible


required.

Significant wildlife habitat 120 m Development and site alteration may be possible


required.

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK - DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORT – VERSION 2 Description of Potential Environmental Effects

June 2010

3.3

Feature Setback Distance Study Alternative When Within Setback

Lake 120 m from the

average annual

high water mark


within setback area; additional report required. No

turbine, solar panel or transformer located within a

lake or within 30 m of the average annual high

water mark.

Permanent or intermittent

stream

120 m from the

average annual

high water mark



turbine, solar panel or transformer located within a

permanent or intermittent stream or within 30 m of

the average annual high water mark.

Seepage area 120 m Development and site alteration may be possible


turbine, solar panel or transformer located within

30 m of a seepage area.


4.1

4.0 Closure

This report has been prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. for the sole benefit of Samsung, and

may not be used by any third party without the express written consent of Samsung and Stantec

Consulting Ltd. The data presented in this report are in accordance with Stantec’s

understanding of the Project as it was presented at the time of the Report.

STANTEC CONSULTING LTD.

Mark Kozak Rob Nadolny

Project Manager Senior Project Manager


Appendix A

Project Location and Study Area

Lake Erie

Cayuga

Fisherville

Jarvis

Hagersville

NellesCorners

Nanticoke

G r a n d R i v e r

TRANSMISSION LINESITING AREA

WIND AND SOLAR SITING AREA

Dunnville

HIGHWAY 3

RAINHAM ROAD

RIV

ER R

OAD

SA

ND

US

K R

OA

D

HALDIMAND ROAD 20

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

55

CH

EA

PS

IDE

RO

AD

KO

HL

ER

RO

AD

BAINS ROAD

CONCESSION 3 W-1

CONCESSION 6 W-1

CONCESSION 5 W-1

CONCESSION 3

CONCESSION 4 W-1

CONCESSION 9 W-1

CONCESSION 1

LAKES H ORE ROAD

HIG

HW

AY

6

CONCESSION 4

DIL

TZ

RO

AD

KINGS ROW

IRISH LINE

CONCESSION 2 W-1

1ST LINE

RO

BIN

SO

N R

OA

D

BIRD ROAD

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

53

CONCESSION 11 W-1

SU

TO

R R

OA

D

LINK ROAD

CONCESSION 6

CONCESSION 2

CONCESSION 8 W-1

HIN

ES

RO

AD1

ST

RO

W

2ND LINE

JU

NC

TIO

N R

OA

D

HALDIMAND ROAD 9

CONCESSION 12 W-1

MA

RS

HA

LL

RO

AD

JAMES ROAD

DR

Y L

AK

E R

OA

D

JO

HN

SO

N R

OA

D

CONCESSION 7

WIL

SO

N R

OA

D

HALDIMAND ROAD 17

SO

UT

H C

AY

UG

A R

OA

D

MEADOWS ROAD

ORTT ROAD

MO

OT

E R

OA

D

INDIAN LINE

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

32

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

70

AIK

EN

S R

OA

D

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

50

SOUTH COAST DRIVE

MELICK ROAD

NEW LA KESHORE ROAD

INDIANA ROAD WEST

CONCESSION 13 W-1

CONCESSION 8

WIN

DE

CK

ER

RO

AD

RIC

HE

RT

RO

AD

HA

LD

DU

NN

TO

WN

LIN

E R

OA

D

MC

KE

NZ

IE R

OA

D

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

49

BR

OO

KL

IN R

OA

D

BR

OO

KS

RO

AD

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

12

RE

ED

S R

OA

D

GR

AN

T R

OA

D

GIB

SON ROAD

WH

EE

LE

R R

OA

D

SW

EE

TS

CO

RN

ER

S R

OA

D

YA

RE

MY

RO

AD

CONCESSION 14 W-1

MCLAUGHLIN RO

AD

DU

XB

UR

Y R

OA

D

LIT

TL

E R

OA

D

MAIN STREET WEST

RE

ICH

EL

D R

OA

D

YU

LE

RO

AD

CONCESSION 10 W-1 JARD

EN R

OAD

MC

FA

RL

AN

E R

OA

D

ST JOHNS ROAD EAST

FIS

HE

RV

ILL

E R

OA

D

CARTER ROAD

BU

RK

E RO

AD

BR

OO

KE

RS

RO

AD

HALDIMAND TRACT ROAD

ER

IE S

TR

EE

T N

OR

TH

H

IGH

W

AY 3

CONCESSION 5

HIG

HW

AY

3

WIN

DE

CK

ER

RO

AD

HIG

HW

AY

6

CONCESSION 7 W-1

HALDIMAND ROAD 17

TOWNLINE ROAD

RAINHAM ROAD

HA

LD

DU

NN

TO

WN

LIN

E R

OA

D

570000

570000

580000

580000

590000

590000

600000

600000

610000

610000

47

40

00

0

47

40

00

0

47

50

00

0

47

50

00

0

Client/Project

Figure No.

Title

PROJECT LOCATION MAP

1.0

SAMSUNG C&TGRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK

May, 2010160960577

NotesLegend1.2.

3.

Coordinate System: UTM NAD 83 - Zone 17 (N).Data Sources: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources© Queens Printer Ontario, 2009; © GREP, 2010;© Samsung, 2010.Image Sources: © Google Earth Pro, 2010(© First Base Solutions, 2010; © TeleAtlas, 2010 -Imagery Date: April 7, 2006).

W:\a

ctive

\60

960

57

7\d

raw

ing\G

IS\M

XD

\RE

A_

Fig

ure

s\P

roje

ctD

escrip

tio

nR

ep

ort

\60

960

57

7_F

ig1

_0

_P

roje

ctL

oca

tio

nM

ap_

20

100

60

1_P

W.m

xd

- 6

/3/2

01

0 @

11

:36:5

9 A

M

Project Location

Airport Runway Area Point

Airport Runway Area Polyline

Airport Runway Area

Airport (OBM)

Spot Elevation Height (OBM)

Building Point (OBM)

Tower (OBM)

Wireless Communication Point

Contour (OBM)

Road

Railway (OBM)

Watercourse (OBM)

Transmission Line (OBM)

Transport Line (OBM)

Building Area (OBM)

Conservation Authority Boundary (OBM)

Provincial Park (OBM)

Tank (OBM)

Pit or Quarry (OBM)

Wireless Communication Corridor

Waterbody (OBM)

Wetland (OBM)

Wooded Area (OBM)

Study Area

ONTARIO

QUEBEC

Ottawa

Toronto

0 2 4km

1:120,000

Lake Erie

Hagersville

Nanticoke

G r a n d R i v e r

HIGHWAY 3

RAINHAM ROAD

SA

ND

US

K R

OA

D

HALDIMAND ROAD 20

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

55

CH

EA

PS

IDE

RO

AD

KO

HL

ER

RO

AD

CONCESSION 3 W-1

CONCESSION 6 W-1

CONCESSION 5 W-1

CONCESSION 3

CONCESSION 4 W-1

CONCESSION 9 W-1

LAKES H ORE ROAD

HIG

HW

AY

6

CONCESSION 4

IRISH LINE

CONCESSION 2 W-1

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

53

CONCESSION 11 W-1

SU

TO

R R

OA

D

LINK ROAD

CONCESSION 6

CONCESSION 8 W-1

CONCESSION 12 W-1

CONCESSION 7

WIL

SO

N R

OA

D

HALDIMAND ROAD 17

MEADOWS ROAD

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

70

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

50

CONCESSION 8

RIC

HE

RT

RO

AD

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

12

GIB

SON ROAD

WH

EE

LE

R R

OA

D

SW

EE

TS

CO

RN

ER

S R

OA

D

YA

RE

MY

RO

AD

DU

XB

UR

Y R

OA

D

LIT

TL

E R

OA

D

MAIN STREET WEST

RE

ICH

EL

D R

OA

D

YU

LE

RO

AD

CONCESSION 10 W-1

FIS

HE

RV

ILL

E R

OA

D

BR

OO

KE

RS

RO

AD

ER

IE S

TR

EE

T N

OR

TH

H

IGH

W

AY 3

CONCESSION 5

Cayuga

Fisherville

Jarvis

WIN

DE

CK

ER

RO

AD

NellesCorners

CONCESSION 7 W-1

RAINHAM ROAD

TRANSMISSION LINESITING AREA

WIND AND SOLAR SITING AREA

Dunnville

RIV

ER R

OAD

BAINS ROAD

CONCESSION 1

DIL

TZ R

OA

D

KINGS ROW

1ST LINE

RO

BIN

SO

N R

OA

D

BIRD ROAD

HIN

ES

RO

AD

1S

T R

OW

2ND LINE

HALDIMAND ROAD 9

MA

RS

HA

LL

RO

AD

JAMES ROAD

DR

Y L

AK

E R

OA

D

JO

HN

SO

N R

OA

D

SO

UT

H C

AY

UG

A R

OA

D

ORTT ROAD

MO

OT

E R

OA

D

INDIAN LINE

AIK

EN

S R

OA

D

SOUTH COAST DRIVE

MELICK ROAD

NEW LAKESHORE ROAD

INDIANA ROAD WEST

CONCESSION 13 W-1

WIN

DE

CK

ER

RO

AD

HA

LD

DU

NN

TO

WN

LIN

E R

OA

D

MC

KE

NZ

IE R

OA

D

HA

LD

IMA

ND

RO

AD

49

BR

OO

KL

IN R

OA

D

BR

OO

KS

RO

AD

RE

ED

S R

OA

D

GR

AN

T R

OA

D

CONCESSION 14 W-1

MCLAUGHLIN ROAD

JARDEN

RO

AD

MC

FA

RL

AN

E R

OA

D

ST JOHNS ROAD EAST

CARTER ROAD

BUR

KE RO

AD

HALDIMAND TRACT ROAD

HIG

HW

AY

3

HIG

HW

AY

6

HALDIMAND ROAD 17

TOWNLINE ROAD

HA

LD

DU

NN

TO

WN

LIN

E R

OA

D

580000

580000

590000

590000

600000

600000

610000

610000

47

40

00

0

47

40

00

0

47

50

00

0

47

50

00

0

47

60

00

0

47

60

00

0

Client/Project

Figure No.

Title

CANADA LANDINVENTORY REVIEW

3.0

SAMSUNG C&TGRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK

June, 2010160960577

NotesLegend1.2.

Coordinate System: UTM NAD 83 - Zone 17 (N).Data Sources: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources© Queens Printer Ontario, 2009; © Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2001; © Samsung, 2010.

W:\a

ctive

\60

96

05

77

\dra

win

g\G

IS\M

XD

\RE

A_F

igu

res\P

roje

ctD

escri

ption

Re

po

rt\6

09

60

577

_F

ig3

_0

_C

LIs

_20

10

06

16_

PW

.mxd -

6/1

6/2

01

0 @

1:5

0:2

0 P

M

Project Location

Road

Waterbody

Artificial Tile Drainage

Random

Systematic

CLI Values

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7Study Area

ONTARIO

QUEBEC

Ottawa

Toronto

0 1 2 3 4km

1:120,000


Appendix B

Turbine Specifications


Appendix C

Environmental Features Screening Checklist

GRAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK - DRAFT PROJECT DESCRIPTION REPORT – VERSION 2 Appendix C – Environmental Features Screening Checklist

June 2010

Page 1 of 8

Appendix C – Grand Renewable Energy Park Environmental Features Screening Checklist

1. Heritage and Archaeological Resources

1.1 Protected properties and heritage resources • These features may be located in the Study Area; there is potential for these features to be affected during construction of the Project.

• Project siting will avoid these areas to the greatest extent possible.

• A Protected Properties and Heritage Assessment will be undertaken for the Project, which will evaluate potential effects to these features, and propose measures to avoid, eliminate or mitigate these effects. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Culture prior to submission of the REA application.

1.2 Archaeological resources • There is potential for archaeological resources to be affected, if present, during construction. Potential effects would consist of direct disturbance (such as physical removal) of these resources from any subsurface works required during construction, including the installation of access roads, power lines, and foundations.

• Stage I and II (if recommended by the Stage I) Archaeological Assessments will be undertaken for the Project. These reports will identify and document these resources within the Project footprint and provide recommendations regarding additional work required prior to or during construction. These reports will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Culture prior to submission of the REA application.

2. Natural Heritage Resources

2.1 Wetlands • Wetlands (provincially significant and non-provincially significant) are located in the Study Area.

• Project siting will avoid these areas to the greatest extent possible.

• No Project related activities will occur within provincially significant wetlands.

• Wetlands may be affected during construction if installation of project infrastructure takes place within 120 m of wetlands. Potential effects may be related to sedimentation from earth moving activities or stockpiled material, accidental spills, or direct loss of non-provincially significant wetland areas if Project components are sited in these features.

• If Project infrastructure is located within 120 m of a provincially significant wetland, an Environmental Impact Study will be conducted to identify the potential effects and propose measures to avoid, eliminate, or mitigate these effects. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources prior to submission of the REA application.


June 2010

Page 2 of 8


2.2 Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSIs) • Provincially significant earth and life science ANSIs are located within the Study Area (predominantly covering areas of the Grand River). Additional information about these features will be collected as part of the records review for the Natural Heritage Assessment.

• Project siting will avoid these areas to the greatest extent possible. No effects are anticipated if infrastructure is not within 120 m of the ANSIs. If Project infrastructure is located within 120 m of an ANSI, an Environmental Impact Study will be conducted to identify the potential effects and propose measures to avoid, eliminate, or mitigate these effects. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources prior to submission of the REA application.

2.3 Valleylands and hazard lands • Valleylands and hazard lands are located within the Study Area; there is potential for these lands to be crossed with Project infrastructure, particularly watercourse crossings.

• Potential effects may be related to the installation of watercourse crossings and are related to erosion or an increase in instability of these slopes.

• Permit applications to local conservation authorities and/or the Department of Fisheries and Oceans for watercourse crossings will be included with the REA application, and will include standard mitigation measures for slope stabilization for each watercourse crossing.

• If Project infrastructure is located within 120 m of a significant valleyland, an Environmental Impact Study will be conducted to identify the potential effects and propose measures to avoid, eliminate, or mitigate these effects. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources prior to submission of the REA application.

2.4 Woodlands • Woodlots are located within the Study Area, and some are likely to be determined as significant.

• Potential effects may result from direct vegetation removal for project related infrastructure or damage to root systems from adjacent infrastructure.

• If Project infrastructure is located within 120 m of a significant woodland, an Environmental Impact Study will be conducted to identify the potential effects and propose measures to avoid, eliminate, or mitigate these effects. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources prior to submission of the REA application.

•

2.5 Provincial parks and conservation reserves • Two provincial parks (Selkirk and James N. Allan) are located within the Study Area. No project related activities will occur within the provincial parks.

• If Project infrastructure is located within 120 m of a provincial park, an Environmental Impact Study will be conducted to identify the potential effects and propose measures to avoid, eliminate, or mitigate these effects. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources prior to submission of the REA application.

• No conservation reserves are located within the Study Area.


June 2010

Page 3 of 8


2.6 Other designated natural areas • Ministry of Natural Resources identified deer yards are located within the Study Area and there is potential for these features to be affected during construction of the Project. Effects may result from vegetation removal or disturbance related effects.

2.7 Significant wildlife species and wildlife habitat • The Natural Heritage Information Centre and the Ministry of Natural Resources have identified historical sightings of species at risk within the general area of study for the Project.

• Area habitats may support such species and there is potential to affect these species directly, and indirectly (e.g. disruption/alteration of the habitat).

• Significant wildlife habitat may be present in the Study Area. If Project infrastructure is located within 120 m of significant wildlife habitat, an Environmental Impact Study will be conducted to identify the potential effects and propose measures to avoid, eliminate, or mitigate these effects. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources prior to submission of the REA application.

2.8 Other wildlife and wildlife habitat • Birds, mammals, amphibian and reptile species are known to use the Study Area. Construction and operation of the Project has the potential to disturb wildlife (including mortality from direct collisions with project infrastructure) and wildlife habitat.

• The majority of Project infrastructure will be located on lands that are already a source of disturbance to wildlife, including right-of-ways and agricultural lands.

2.9 Significant flora species and vegetation communities • The Natural Heritage Information Centre and the Ministry of Natural Resources have identified significant flora species within the general area of study for the Project.

• There is potential to affect these species during construction, however most of the Project will be located within areas already cleared for rural and agricultural use. Potential effects may result from direct removal of vegetation or from works within 120 m of the feature.

2.10 Other flora species and vegetation communities • The Project will be mostly located within areas already cleared for rural and agricultural land uses. Potential effects may result from direct removal of vegetation or introduction of non-native species to existing vegetation communities.

2.11 Fish and fish habitat • Project related works may be within areas of fish and fish habitat (watercourse crossings). Additional potential effects may be related to the installation of watercourse crossings (e.g. sedimentation). Where required, mitigation measures are available to reduce or eliminate potential effects.

• Permit applications to local conservation authorities and/or the Department of Fisheries and Oceans for watercourse crossings will be included with the REA application, and will include standard mitigation measures for protection of fish and fish habitat for each watercourse crossing.

• If Project infrastructure is located within 120 m, or within, an area of fish habitat, an Environmental Impact Study will be conducted to identify the potential effects and propose measures to avoid, eliminate, or mitigate these effects. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources prior to submission of the REA application.


June 2010

Page 4 of 8


3. Water Bodies

3.1 Surface water (watercourses) quality, quantities, or flow

• Watercourses are located throughout the project and the Study Area is bordered by Lake Erie to the south. There are no Lake Trout lakes that are at or above development capacity within the Study Area.

• Construction (e.g., culverts for access road crossings) may be proposed within surface water courses and limited works (e.g. stringing overhead power lines) may be proposed within 30 metres of a watercourse. Solar panels, turbines and transformers will not be located within 30 m of these features.

• The proposed development does not involve the storage or consumption of surface water.

• The proposed development will not require significant alteration of surface runoff patterns.

• Surface water quality could be affected by accidental spills/releases to the environment and sedimentation and/or erosion during construction of access roads.

• If Project infrastructure is located within 120 m of a water body, a Water Body report will be prepared that identifies and assesses potential effects and proposes measures to avoid, eliminate, or mitigate these effects.

3.2 Groundwater quality, quantity, or movement • It is possible that some dewatering activities may be required when installing Project infrastructure (e.g. tower foundations). Geotechnical investigations will gather information related to location and depth of groundwater in the Project area.

• Withdrawal quantities will be below 50,000 l/d and are unlikely to affect groundwater quality or quantity.

• There is potential to affect water quality of water wells in close proximity to the construction sites. Groundwater quality could be affected by accidental spills/releases to the environment.

4. Air Quality

4.1 Emissions of pollutants or greenhouse gases • Construction equipment will generate emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases; however this will be short in duration and limited in extent.

• Operation of the Project will not result in negative effects on air quality since no emissions of pollutants or greenhouse gases are generated by the wind turbines and solar panels.

4.2 Emission of dust or odour • During construction dust may be generated from earthmoving or vehicular activity – any emissions will be short in duration and limited to the lands surrounding the work areas.

• No odour emissions are expected to result from construction, operation, or decommissioning of the Project.


June 2010

Page 5 of 8


5. Environmental Noise

5.1 Emission of noise • There will be an increase in ambient environmental noise during construction related to increased traffic, the operation of construction equipment and construction activities.

• Mechanical and aerodynamic noise will be emitted from the wind turbines. Noise is emitted from transformers.

• There is potential for limited environmental noise effects at sensitive receptors.

• For the wind portion of the project, a detailed environmental noise impact assessment will be undertaken as per the MOE’s document Noise Guidelines for Wind Farms - Interpretation for Applying MOE NPC Publications to Wind Power Generation Facilities (October 2008). Noise assessments are also required by the MOE for transformer stations.

6. LandUse and Resources

6.1 Existing land uses • Project is located in a predominantly rural and agricultural area.

• Lands for project infrastructure will be required for the lease period.

• During the lease period these lands will be changed from their present land use. Potential effects are related to the change in land use (i.e., from agricultural use to Project related use).

6.2 Local businesses and facilities • Area businesses will benefit financially from spending associated with construction activities and fulfilling operational supplies.

6.3 Recreation areas • Construction activities will not directly affect recreation areas.

• Increased noise during construction may interfere with nearby recreational uses.

• No effects are anticipated during the operation phase.

6.4 Landfill sites and waste disposal • Construction wastes, such as excavated soils, equipment packaging and wrappings, and scraps, will be produced.

• The Project will generate waste associated with turbine construction, maintenance and operation, and decommissioning. A waste collection and disposal management plan will be developed for each phase of the Project.

• No negative effects are anticipated on local landfill sites.


June 2010

Page 6 of 8


6.5 Agricultural Lands • Project infrastructure will occupy areas of Class 3 agricultural land and potential effects are related to the change in use of the agricultural land.

• The operation of the project will not negatively affect the use of adjoining prime agricultural lands, field crop production, or livestock pasturing, all of which can occur in close proximity to the project.

• The 2005 PPS contains policies that support the establishment of renewable facilities in rural and agricultural areas.

6.6 Mineral, aggregate, or petroleum resources • There are known petroleum resources within the Study Area (i.e., gas wells).

• There is a designated aggregate resource license within the lands proposed for the Project.

• No potential effects are anticipated to existing mineral or aggregate resources.

• If Project infrastructure is located within 75 m of petroleum wells or works, it will be identified during the Natural Heritage Assessment. This report will be reviewed and commented on by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Additional consultations will be undertaken with the Petroleum Resources Centre to avoid potential effects to these features.

6.7 Forest resources • Construction of the project will not affect any merchantable forest resources.

6.8 Game and fishery resources, including creating access to previously inaccessible areas

• The area is largely cleared for agriculture and there are no areas that could be deemed inaccessible.

• There are potential fisheries resources that may be affected by the construction of the Project during work near/in water (see items 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, and 2.11).

6.9 Remediation of contaminated land • History of the area is rural and agricultural, therefore there is limited potential for contaminated sites, however the possibility of encountering such lands cannot be completely ruled out.


June 2010

Page 7 of 8


6.10 Telecommunications network • There is potential to interfere with telecommunications networks in the Study Area. Potential effects may be due to infrastructure being located within the “line of sight” of telecommunications networks, or due to interference with radar systems.

• Consultation with appropriate agencies regarding potential effects to these systems will be undertaken for the Project.

7. Provincial and Local Infrastructure

7.1 Provincial and other major infrastructure • Potential for an increase of traffic during construction on provincial roads due to commuting workforce and the transport of equipments and supplies. Potential effects are related to traffic congestion/safety and road damage from construction equipment and excess loads.

• Additional provincial infrastructure in the Study Area includes transmission lines and railways.

• Other provincial and major infrastructure in proximity to the Project location, when known, will be identified as part of the records reviews and site investigations completed for the REA process.

7.2 Local infrastructure and services • The transport of equipment and supplies during the construction phase will result in additional (temporary) road use and traffic to the Project sites.

• Excess loads and numerous truck trips may deteriorate local road conditions.

• Municipal consultations will include discussions regarding mitigation and potential compensation should municipal roads be affected by the Project.

•

• During operation supplies will be intermittently delivered to the Project as required.

• Other local infrastructure in proximity to the Project location will be identified in consultation with local municipalities. Discussions with local municipalities will include measures to avoid or mitigate potential effects to this infrastructure.

• The construction period will result in additional demand for local goods and services.

• A limited number of operating personnel may be required to maintain the facility; therefore there will be only a nominal demand on/for public services (e.g., housing, hospitals, and schools).


June 2010

Page 8 of 8


8. Public Health and Safety

8.1 Public health and safety • Potential effects during construction are generally associated with increased traffic in the Study Area and unauthorized access to the work areas. Health and safety protocols and procedures will be developed during the REA process and by the construction contractor.

• Potential exists for accidents and malfunctions during operation and thus there may be general public safety concerns with the new infrastructure. Health and safety protocols and procedures will be developed during the REA process and prior to Project commissioning.

• There is no scientific evidence, to date, to demonstrate a causal association between wind turbine noise and adverse health effects.

9. Areas Protected under Provincial Plans and Policies

9.1 Greenbelt (Protected Countryside and Natural Heritage System), Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Area, Niagara Escarpment Plan Area, Lake Simcoe Watershed Plan Area

• No areas protected under the specified Provincial Plans and Policies are located within the Study Area.

10. Aboriginal Interests

10.1 First Nations or other Aboriginal communities • Aboriginal communities identified by provincial and federal governments will be engaged as part of the REA process.

• Aboriginal communities have been and will continue to be engaged as part of project planning. Potential effects to aboriginal or treaty rights, and measures for mitigation, will be identified during engagement with the aboriginal communities.

11. Other

11.1 Aeronautical obstruction • Some of the wind turbines may require aviation safety lighting. Specific lighting requirements for the project will be determined by Transport Canada.

11.2 Interference with navigable waters • Project may cross or affect potentially navigable waterways. Confirmation of the presence of these features in the project area will be obtained from Transport Canada.

grand renewable energy park - draft project description

Documents