grand rapids community college academic governing council
DESCRIPTION
Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council. General Education Distribution Task Group Steve Abid M.A., Arts & Sciences, Interim Associate Dean and Social Sciences Ric Underhile, Ph.D., Instructional Support & Interdisciplinary Studies, Associate Dean September 2010. Issue. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Grand Rapids Community CollegeAcademic Governing Council
1
GRCC currently does not have a process to determine where a course fits into the General Education distribution system
GRCC lacks a process to determine if a course fits into the General Education distribution
The College does not articulate the learner outcomes it expects students to achieve as a result of satisfying the General Education distribution requirements
2
Handicaps the College from being programmatically responsive to students, faculty, and departments
Changes must be harmonious with the Michigan Association for College Registrars and Admissions Officers Agreement (MACRAO)
3
Establish a definition of each distribution area
Define the criteria that will be used in making decisions about inclusion of courses in the distribution areas
Articulate expectations for outcomes upon successful completion of the distribution areas
4
Group I: HumanitiesGroup II: Social SciencesGroup III: Natural Sciences and
Mathematics*Note: The next 3 slides are copied from Educational
Planning Guide for Associate in Arts Degree with MACRAO
MACROA
5
6
Architecture (AR) 111 Art (AT) 105, 106, 270, 271 Communications (COM) (formerly SC) 131, 135, 227, 228, 232, 235, 236, 240, 241, 250 English (EN) 233, 235, 237, 242, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252,261, 262, 270, 271, 272, 275, 278, 281, 282, 284, 291, 293 Foreign Language (ARA, CHI, FR, GR, SP) 101, 102, 231, 232, 294 Humanities (HU) 204, 205, 210, 240, 245, 270, 273, 274, 280, 281 Music (MU) 107, 109, 235, 236, 237 Philosophy (PL) 201, 202, 205, 206, 207, 209, 212 Photography (PO) 105 Sign Language (SL) 150, 155, 171, 172 Theater (TH) 248
Anthropology (AN) 201, 205, 210, 280, 285 Criminal Justice (CJ) 110, 111, 140, 235, 236, 237 Economics (EC) 251, 252, 290 Geography (GE) 132, 135, 140, 210, 253, 281 Gerontology (GO) 203, 261, 262, 263 History (HS) 101, 102, 120, 121, 215, 225, 230, 239, 240,
241, 242, 249, 250,251, 260, 276, 281, 290, 295 Political Science (PS) 110, 200, 201, 202, 215, 225, 230,
245, 250 Psychology (PY) 101, 106, 201, 203, 231, 232, 233, 234,
251, 260, 263, 281 Social Science (SS) 120, 293 Sociology (SO) 205, 251, 254, 260, 261, 262, 263, 265,
270, 295 Social Work (SW) 102, 103
7
Non-lab courses: Astronomy (AS) 102 Biology (BI) 125, 160, 171,
232 Business (BA) 150, 254 Computer (CO) 124, 127,
225, 227 Electronics (EL) 132 Mathematics (MA)
(except MA 003, 095, 096, 097), 104, 105, 107, 108, 110, 124, 127, 129, 131133, 134, 138, 210, 211, 215, 245, 255, 257
Psychology (PY) 281 Technology (TE) 103, 104
Lab Courses: Astronomy (AS) 103, 106, 108 Biology (BI) 101, 103, 104, 117,
121122, 126, 127, 151, 152, 204, 207, 215
Chemistry (CM) (except CM 100 and 102), 101, 103, 104, 109, 113, 114, 210, 212, 231,229+230, 236+237, 238+239, 241, 252, 282
Geography (GE) 132 (counts as lab fall 2004 or later)
Geology (GL) 101, 104, 105, 111 Physical Science (PC) 101, 111,
141, 151 Physics (PH) 115, 125, 126, 245,
2468
Technology Skills Communication
Skills Computation Skills Critical Thinking
and Problem Solving Skills
Information Management Skills
Interpersonal Skills Personal Skills Diversity Skills (Sustainability and
Community Engagement Skills [proposed])
9
The General Learner Outcomes are currently being revised for unity and clarity so that they express competencies, not merely content.
Additionally, it is likely that the General Learner Outcomes will evolve to Institutional Learning Outcomes.
Notably, there will be fewer, but each will be broad enough to embrace the skills and competencies expressed in many of the current GLOs.
10
Steve Abid (Co-chair)
Sandy Andrews Janice Balyeat Rebecca Brinks Glenn Gelderloos Bernie Manker
Fatima Nieves Deb Nordman Diane Patrick Ric Underhile (Co-
chair) Doug Wabeke
11
*Additional faculty & staff may be added as needed to serve in a resource capacity.
Three formal planning meetings that resulted in a review of how other institutions have addressed this common problem
The review of a complex rubric that illustrates a strategy for organizing general education
A kick-off meeting with the original team, many of whom have now retired
A repopulation of the committee A new kick-off and working meeting (Oct.
22nd)
12
Communicate your ideas to team members
Patience
Assistance in helping faculty make greater meaning of the significance of general education
Recognition that this work is separate, but inseparable from assessment of student learning efforts
13
14