graduate thesis proposal - dalhousie...
TRANSCRIPT
2010 GRADUATE THESIS PROPOSAL
EARTH SCIENCES 6300
NAME (Last, First)
Walsh, Fred Dalhousie Student ID:
B00100887
DEGREE PROGRAMME: MSc FIELD(S) OF SPECIALIZATION: Micropaleontology
SUPERVISOR and COMMITTEE:
Supervisor:
Dr. David B. Scott, Dalhousie University, Centre for Environmental and Marine Geology, and the
Department of Earth Sciences
Committee:
Dr. Martin Gibling, Dalhousie University, Department of Earth Sciences
Dr. Lawrence Plug, Dalhousie University, Department of Earth Sciences
TITLE OF PROPOSAL:
Foraminifera as proxies for recent and paleo methane release in ocean floor sediments
Key words: (up to 10)
Beaufort Sea, proxies for methane, foraminifera, Ammotium cassis and Elphidiella hannai, radiocarbon
dating, Mackenzie delta, CASES
LIST INNOVATIONS or EXPECTED SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES (100 words total max):
(1) Foraminiferal as a proxy to detect methane which allow scientists and hydrocarbon exploration
teams to identify methane (biogenic or thermogenic) areas, regardless of whether there is
methane gas detected in the water column
(2) Identification of these foraminiferal proxies in the seafloor sediment record can be used to
recognize paleo-methane events. Once these events have been dated using the radiocarbon
method, they can be then added to information supporting time frames of climate studies
completed by other scientists.
STUDENT’S SIGNATURE: SUPERVISOR’S SIGNATURE:
DATE: DATE:
2
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RESEARCH (IN LAY TERMS):
In 2004, scientists and crew aboard the Canadian Coast Guard Ship Amundsen collected box and piston
core samples from the Mackenzie Delta, Beaufort Shelf, Beaufort Sea and Amundsen Gulf, in the
Canadian Arctic. This was initiated as a joint venture of the Canadian Arctic Shelf Exchange Study
(CASES) and Canadian Arctic Net, both designed to gather information on the Canadian Arctic. A.
Rochon, S. Blasco and P. Travaglini (2006) and C. Paull, W. Ussler III, S. Dallimore, S. Blasco, T.
Lorenson, H. Melling, B. Medioli, F. Nixon and F. McLaughlin (2007) completed papers revealing
certain areas on the Mackenzie Delta, Beaufort Slope and Beaufort Sea that regularly release methane.
Research by F. Walsh ( 2006), that analyzed foraminifera (very small, primitive, single cell animals),
from core samples on the Mackenzie delta, suggested that two foraminifera (Elphidiella hannai and
Ammotium cassis) may be proxies for methane. Further investigations in papers by D. Scott, T. Schell,
A. Rochon and S. Blasco (2008a) and D. Scott, T. Schell, A. Rochon and S. Blasco (2008b) show the
Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis have been found in these methane (biogenic or thermogenic)
areas; however, thus far, they have not been found outside these areas. Three core samples from inside
and outside the known methane areas on the Mackenzie Delta, Beaufort Shelf, and Beaufort Sea, will be
studied for Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis, along with any other foraminifera that follow the
same tendency. This information along with data from other cores already analyzed, (inside and outside
known methane areas on the Mackenzie Delta, Beaufort Shelf, and Beaufort Sea), should determine if
the Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis are proxies to methane. If this study concludes that there
are foraminifera proxies for methane, then a dependable way of detecting methane (a hazard for
hydrocarbon exploration) can be established and by dating the sections in the core that show these
foraminifera, ages of paleo(ancient)-methane occurrences (a contributor to past global climate changes)
will also be established.
TIMETABLE: (include work completed to date):
Activity Start Date End Date
Methane Research July 2008 Oct. 2011
Micropaleontological Analysis Nov. 2008 Sept. 2011
Radiocarbon Dating Sept. 2010 Oct. 2010
Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope Imagery Nov. 2010 Dec. 2010
Interpretation of data Oct. 2011 March 2012
Write thesis April 2012 July 2012
Thesis completed July 2012
Have all permissions for access to data or samples been acquired (briefly explain if NO):
Yes
Are there any risks to data acquisition? (if YES, explain risk and mitigation):
No
3
BUDGET: (salaries not included; do not index for inflation)
Item Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Field work N/A N/A N/A N/A
Laboratory expenses N/A N/A N/A N/A
Materials and supplies (other than lab) Photocopying
and printing
Travel N/A N/A N/A N/A
Other costs 14
C Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
Analyses 12 @ $700
Total
In-kind support:
NSERC research grant was awarded to Dr. D. B. Scott of the Centre for Environmental and Marine
Geology and the Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University. The Geological Survey of Canada
in Dartmouth, NS, Canada, has provided the core storage facility, as well as the splitting, photography
and Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (ESEM) equipment. Dr. D. B. Scott at Dalhousie
University acquired x-ray imagery (to denote internal structures), also the lab space and equipment
necessary for washing and sieving the sediment, as well as the tools for foraminiferal study. The
microscope was provided by John Batt (manager) at the Aquatron research facility in the Department of
Oceanography of Dalhousie University. Dr. D. B. Scott has also provided reference material and a
foraminiferal archive for species identification.
Budget justification:
In order for Elphidium hannai and Ammotium cassis to be used as paleo-indicators of methane seeps,
calcareous material from different layers of the sediment must be radiocarbon (14
C) dated. Six cores will
have 2 mg of CaCO3 foraminifera (from layers bearing the species of interest Elphidium hannai and
Ammotium cassis, or unusual changes in sedimentation) removed and dried for 14
C dating. Since each
core needs radiocarbon dating in at least two different places (to date areas of interest and to constrain
sedimentation rates), at least 12 analyses will be required at a cost of $8400. Radiocarbon ages will
allow the intervals bearing Elphidium hannai and Ammotium cassis to be linked to paleo climate records
and should identify the age of past methane seepages. The prepared samples will be sent to Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution for analysis.
Materials and supplies (Printer cartridges, paper and photocopying) are needed for completion of the
thesis.
4
Statement of Problem
Within the Beaufort Sea and Mackenzie Delta, Canadian Arctic, there are known sites of natural gas
emission at which methane concentrations are 3-5 times higher than in average seawater (Rochon et al.
2003; Paull et al. 2007). Methane stores significantly more organic carbon than conventional
hydrocarbons (e.g., oil, natural gas, Kvenvolden 1993) and is thus of potentially great economic value,
resulting in a recent expansion in methane exploration. However, due to its flammability, methane
exploration is also more hazardous than conventional hydrocarbon exploration. If methane gas is
detected or suspected during hydrocarbon exploration, procedures can be adapted accordingly to deal
with the additional hazard. If methane is present in seafloor sediments but not detected in the sea water,
exploration personnel may be at risk. Therefore, it is important to identify quick and inexpensive proxies
to methane in seafloor sediments, such as certain fauna of foraminifera, which could be used to identify
methane-rich areas and mitigate the corresponding risk to hydrocarbon exploration programs. Species of
foraminifera have been observed in several methane seep areas throughout the world, but none have
been specifically linked to the presence of methane thus far. Preliminary research on foraminifera in the
Beaufort Sea and Mackenzie Delta has suggested that the foraminifera Elphidiella hannai and
Ammotium cassis are potential proxies for methane (Walsh 2006), leading to the following hypothesis,
“Foraminifera in core and box samples may be used to identify the presence of methane, both present
and past, in seafloor sediments”.
Region of study
Box and piston cores 803 and 650, both on the Beaufort shelf, will be studied for all foraminifera
with an emphasis on Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis. The results of former research; (cores
805A, 805C, 609A, 850BX and PC, 750BX and PC and124PC), from inside known methane regions,
like mud volcanoes and pingo-like feature areas and outside known methane regions, will be referenced
5
for all foraminifera and presented as additional verification for this master’s thesis (locations shown on
Fig. 1).
←
Known pingo-like feature area
NStudy Area
Kopanoar mud volcano
Mackenzie Delta Beaufort sea
Amundsen Gulf
Figure 1. Diagram shows locations of box and piston cores utilized in this study. Insert upper left corner
with arrow showing area of the Beaufort Sea in the Canadian Arctic. Shaded area denotes the pingo-like
feature area (PLF). Box and piston core 803, 250 meters of water (an area of no known methane), along
with box and piston core 650, 245 meters of water (methane seeps present) on the Beaufort shelf have to
be researched for this thesis. The data collected from former research, box cores 805A, 36 meters of
water, 805C, 66 meters of water (Kopanoar mud volcano), 609, 44 meters of water (PLF area on the
Beaufort shelf). Box and piston core 850, 1071 meters of water, box and piston core 750, 1087 meters of
water, (Beaufort Slope) and core 124, 442 meters of water (Amundsen Gulf), all in an area of no known
methane, will be incorporated into this thesis (modified from Google Earth Feb. 2010).
Background
The amount of methane in the Canadian arctic has been estimated at 16 x 1012
m3 (Smith and
Judge 1995). As conventional hydrocarbon resources grow scarce, this methane reservoir has attracted
the attention of the hydrocarbon industry and has been discussed as a future energy resource in the
magazine Geotimes as the future energy resource. An understanding of the spatial and temporal
6
distribution of both past and present methane seeps is pertinent to this exploration. Mud volcanoes in the
Beaufort Sea (e.g., Fig.1) are sites of active methane release, as demonstrated by above average methane
concentrations in their vicinities (Rochon et al., 2003). Water above pingo-like-features (PLFs) on the
Beaufort Sea Shelf as well as cores from eight PLFs showed elevated methane concentrations (Fig. 1)
(Paull et al., 2007). A Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) has observed streams of gas bubbles coming
from the crests of the PLFs: the gas samples collected by the ROV were predominantly methane (Paull
et al., 2007). Exploration in such methane-rich areas poses a serious risk which could be mitigated if a
suitable proxy were identified.
Proxies for Methane
Methane is currently identified in seafloor sediments in a number of ways. Geophysical surveys
using Bottom Simulating Reflection (BSR), a distinctive seismic reflection, can indicate the presence of
methane gas hydrates trapped in seafloor sediments (Tréhu et al. 2006). If methane is being actively
released into the water column, it can be directly measured from water samples (e.g., Paull et al. 2007).
Preliminary research on foraminifera in the Mackenzie Delta has shown that the foraminifera Elphidiella
hannai and Ammotium cassis are potential proxies to methane (Walsh 2006). The advantage of a
foraminiferal proxy to methane over BSR is a higher spatial resolution. Furthermore, it can be also used
as a paleomethane indicator in seafloor sediments (making exploration more efficient). Paleomethane
information can be used to understand the role of methane in climate change. The proposed research will
analysis foraminifera from box and piston cores 803 and 650 from the Beaufort Shelf (Fig. 1) and
compare these results with existing data from the other locations, retrieved from both methane-present
and methane-absent seafloor sediments in the Mackenzie Delta, Beaufort Shelf and slope and the
Amundsen Gulf in the Canadian Arctic (Fig.1).
7
Potential Foraminifera Proxies
Previous studies (Panieri 2005, Heinz et al. 2005) have demonstrated associations between
various species of foraminifera and hydrocarbons; however, none have confirmed that foraminifera are
proxies to methane. Benthic foraminifera have been found associated with a hydrocarbon seep in the
Rockall Trough in the north east Atlantic. Although there were no species specifically restricted to the
seepage area, several species appeared to be more resilient to seepage areas (Panieri 2005). Research on
living benthic foraminifera in close proximity to gas hydrates at the Cascadia convergent margin in the
north east Pacific yielded one foraminifera species (Spiroplectammina biformis), that tolerated the seep
environment. However, because Spiroplectammina biformis was also found in non-seep environments, it
could not be used as an indicator for seep environments (Heinz et al. 2005). More recently
Spiroplectammina biformis was identified as a dominant species in methane-present areas of the
Beaufort Sea and Mackenzie Delta; 805A and 805C on the Kopanoar mud volcano and 609, a known
PLFs area (Fig. 1) (Walsh 2006). Two other species, Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis, were also
found in these areas (Walsh 2006). However, unlike Spiroplectammina biformis, they have yet to be
identified in methane-free areas. These data suggest that foraminiferal proxies for methane may be
limited to only a few species. Thus far, Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis are the most
prospective candidates: they are present in known methane areas (e.g. mud volcanoes and PLF’s) and
not observed outside methane areas. These two foraminiferal species are found in other areas of the
world, particularly in polluted areas that contain methane (Scott 1974, Wefer 1976, Scott et al. 1977,
Jones and Ross 1979, Scott et al. 1980; 2008a; 2008b). However, in these areas there are many other
contaminants (e.g., heavy metals and chemicals) that could affect the foraminifera, whereas the
Canadian Arctic is considered to be largely free of such contaminants. By extension, it is hypothesized
that methane exerts a primary control on their spatial distribution in the Beaufort Sea.
8
Objectives
Safe hydrocarbon exploration in Canada’s Arctic requires knowledge about the presence and
distribution of potentially hazardous methane seeps. The foraminifera Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium
cassis have been suggested as proxies for the presence of methane (present and past) in seafloor
sediments (Walsh 2006, Scott et al. 2008a; 2008b and Walsh and Scott 2010). I propose three objectives
for this thesis: (1) compile a detailed map on known methane areas on the Beaufort shelf, Canadian
Arctic using all present available data; (2) document foraminifera populations in core and box samples
inside and outside the known methane areas (e.g. mud volcanoes and PLFs) to analyze for all species of
foraminifera (particularly Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis) in the ocean sediments, thereby
investigating the spatial link between Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis and methane; and (3)
date material from particular layers of the sediment that contain Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium
cassis, by the radiocarbon (14
C) method, to determine when methane was present in the past.
My long term objective is to evaluate whether Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis can be linked
spatially and temporally with known methane seeps on the Beaufort Shelf in the Canadian Arctic,
thereby providing a proxy for both present methane seeps (a hazard for hydrocarbon exploration) and
past methane (a contributor to past global climate changes).
Methods
Collection of material The box and piston cores used in this study were collected during the 2004 Canadian Arctic
Shelf Exchange Study (CASES) (Leg 8) onboard the NGCC Amundsen. Box cores retrieve large,
undisturbed samples from the seafloor, and are subsampled with push cores. Piston cores were sampled
in an adjacent area to the box cores. The push and piston cores were refrigerated at 4˚ C to prevent
sample deterioration and later stored at the Bedford Institute of Oceanography (BIO). Photos, of the
seafloor, were also taken in the area at the time of sampling. Before sampling, the push cores and piston
cores were split and half was photographed. The working half was described by staff of BIO for texture,
9
color and grain size and later wrapped and sent to Dalhousie University. The other half was sealed up
and again refrigerated for archival purposes. The cores were then x-rayed (to illustrate internal
structures) at the dental x-ray unit at Dalhousie University, using high resolution mammography film.
Then, along their length at the Centre for Environmental and Marine Geology, Dalhousie University
Earth Sciences, the core were sampled at 1 cm intervals (push core), or 10 cm intervals (piston core).
Laboratory processing
10cc aliquots will be sampled from each push core and piston core sample and washed through
two sieves (>63µm and >45<63µm sieves). Samples will then be examined in liquid suspension under a
binocular microscope for foraminifera at magnifications of 20-40x. Samples with large numbers of
foraminifera (n = >500) will be split using a 6-way-wet-splitter (Scott and Hermelin 1993). The samples
will be poured into a column of turbulent water and left for at least 1 hour to settle into 6 equal chambers
at the bottom of the column. This method provides a uniform distribution with a 10% margin of error
and reduces the foraminifera abundance to a manageable count size. For sufficient quantitative
examination a minimum of 300 foraminifera should be counted from each sample (Phleger 1960 and
Patterson and Fishbien 1989). For example if the estimated abundance of the foraminifera is N =1000
and after the split, N =166 per chamber, then two chambers must be counted (n=332) to obtain the
desired abundance. The examined material will then be stored in containers with formaldehyde (a long
term preservative) and borax (to prevent dissolution of calcareous foraminifera) for later study.
Data sorting
The foraminiferal species are identified and abundances are noted. The number of species in a
sample has no bearing on the counts required to measure accurately the fractional abundance of a
species (Patterson and Fishbien 1989). However, details on species diversity are required to better
understand the environment in which these foraminifera grew. Abundances of individual foraminiferal
species will be converted into percentages.
10
Assuming that the foraminifera are normally distributed in the samples, the standard error (SE)
will be calculated using Eq.1 (Patterson and Fishbien 1989),
Eq. 1
where Xi is the percentage (as a decimal) of the total abundance of a foraminifera species, and N is the
total population of foraminifera counted.
The resultant standard error (SXi) provides a 95% confidence limit (2σ) for the abundance of each
foraminiferal species in a particular sample.
Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (ESEM)
Selected foraminifera will be imaged using the ESEM at the Bedford Institute of Oceanography.
Unlike the Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) which requires a conductive coating on samples, and
has a vacuum in the specimen chamber, the ESEM allows a gaseous environment to occupy the
specimen chamber, and a carbon coating or other treatments are not required. This allows for a more
cost effective means of obtaining high-resolution images (capturing the fine features on foraminifera),
which will contribute to a visual archive of foraminiferal species in the Canadian Arctic.
Radiocarbon dating
For Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis to be linked to the climate change record as paleo-
indicators of methane seeps, calcareous material from different layers of the sediment must be
radiocarbon (14
C) dated. Six cores will have 2 mg of CaCo3 foraminifera (from layers bearing the species
of interest Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis, or unusual changes in sedimentation) removed and
dried for 14
C dating. Since each core requires radiocarbon dating in at least two different places (to date
areas of interest and to constrain sedimentation rates), at least 12 analyses will be required. Radiocarbon
ages will allow the intervals bearing Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis to be linked to paleo
climate records and should assist in identifying the age of periods of past methane seepage. The
11
prepared samples will be sent to Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution for 14
C analysis. Core 850 (Fig.
1) from 1071 m water on the Beaufort Shelf has been dated, showing that the upper 16 cm yielded a
210Pb age of ~100 years, with a confidence limit (2sigma). This same core has been radiocarbon dated
and yielded 14
C ages that I calibrated (utilizing the computer program CALIB 6), for magnetic field
variations and marine reservoir effect (circulation), (Gosse 2010). The 100 cm level reveled a
calibrated age of 8089 + 70 yr BP, the 151 cm level was 12142 + 133 yr BP, and the 202 cm level was
7286 + 68 yr BP, all with a confidence limit (1 sigma) (Schell et al. 2008).
Interpretation
If the cores inside the known methane areas (mud volcanoes and PLF areas in Fig.1) have
foraminifera (at present only the Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis) that are not found in the
other cores outside the known methane areas then it should establish the Elphidiella hannai and
Ammotium cassis as proxies for methane. This being the case and foraminifera are found in deeper
sections of other cores, then those sections can be dated to obtain paleo-methane occurrences.
Anticipated Results and Significance
If Elphidiella hannai and Ammotium cassis are found to be reliable proxies for the presence of
methane, then two benefits will be developed from this thesis; (1) a dependable way of detecting
methane (a hazard for hydrocarbon exploration) can be established; thus mitigating the hazard,
especially if no methane was detected in the water column; and (2) the 14
C ages can be used to constrain
paleo-methane occurrences (a contributor to past global climate changes) and used to substantiate
previous research referring to past climate alterations.
References Gosse, J. 2010. Explanation of radiocarbon dating method for calibration of
14C dates, for magnetic field
variation and marine reservoir effect (circulation). By personal communication.
Heinz, P., Sommer, S., Pfannkuche, O., and Hemleben, C. 2005. Living benthic
foraminifera in sediments influenced by gas hydrates at the Cascadia convergent
margin, NE Pacific. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Vol. 304: pp. 77-89.
Jones, G. D., and Ross,C. A. 1979. Seasonal distribution of foraminifera in Samish Bay,
Washington. Journal of Paleontology 53, pp. 245-257.
12
Kvenvolden, K. A. 1993, Gas hydrates- geological perspective and global change. Reviews of
Geophysics, 31, pp. 173-187.
Panieri, G. 2005. Benthic foraminifera associated with a hydrocarbon seep in the
Rockall Trough (NE Atlantic). Geobios, 38, pp. 247-255.
Patterson, R. T., and Fishbien, E. 1989. Re-Examination of the Statistical Methods Used
to determine the Number of Point Counts Needed for Micropaleontological
Quantitative Research. Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 245-248.
Paull, C. K., Ussler III, W., Dallimore, S. R., Blasco, S. M., Lorenson, T. D., Milling, H.,
Medioli, B. E., Nixon, F. M., and McLaughlin, F.A. 2007. Origin of pingo-like- features on the
Beaufort Sea Shelf and their possible relationship to decomposing methane gas hydrates.
Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, LO1603, 5 pages.
Phleger, F. B. 1960. Ecology and Distribution of Recent Foraminifera. John Hopkins
Press, Baltimore, pp. 297.
Rochon, A., Blasco, S. and Travaglini P. 2003, Cruise MR02-K05 on board the RV Mirai: Joint western
Artic Climate Study (JWACS) 2002 Geoscience Program- LEG2 – Tuktoyaktuk (Northwest
Territories) to Dutch Harbor (Alaska) September 20 – October 10, 2003. Geological Survey of
Canada, Open File 1781. pp 15-16.
Schell, T. M. Scott, D. B., Rochon, A. and Blasco, S. M. 2008, Late Quaternary paleoceanography and
paleo-sea ice conditions in the Mackenzie Trough and Canyon, Beaufort Sea: Can. Journal of
Earth Sciences, v. 45, no. 11, pp. 1399-1415.
Scott, D. B. 1974. Recent benthonic foraminifera from Samish and Padilla Bays,
Washington. Northwest Science 48, pp. 1566-1587.
Scott, D. B., Medioli, F. S., and Schafer, C. T. 1977. Temporal changes in foraminiferal
distributions in Miramichi River Estuary, New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of
Earth Sciences 14, pp. 1560-1587.
Scott, D. B., Schafer, C. T., and Medioli, F. S. 1980. Eastern Canadian estuarine
foraminifera: a framework for comparison: Journal of Foraminiferal Research, V. 10, pp. 205-
234.
Scott, D. B., and Hermelin, J. O. R. 1993. A device for precision splitting of
micropaleontological samples in liquid suspension. Journal of paleontology, v. 67,
pp. 151-154.
Scott, D. B., Schell, T., Rochon, A., and Blasco, S. 2008a. Benthic foraminifera in the
surface sediments of the Beaufort Shelf and Slope, Beaufort Sea, Canada:
Applications and Implications for past sea-ice conditions. Journal of Marine
Systems, 74, pp. 840-863.
Scott, D. B., Schell, T., Rochon, A., and Blasco, S. 2008b. Modern benthic foraminifera
in the surface sediments of the Beaufort Shelf, Slope and Mackenzie Trough, Beaufort Sea,
Canada: Taxonomy and summary of surficial distributions. Journal of Foraminiferal Research,
V. 38, pp. 36-57.
Smith, S. L., and Judge, A. S. 1995. Estimates of methane hydrate volumes in the
Beaufort-Mackenzie region, Northwest Territories, in Current Research, 1995-B,
Geological Survey of Canada, 81-88 (also Geoligical Survey of Canada Open File
2746, 1993).
Tréhu, A. M., Ruppel, C., Holland, M., Dickens, G. R., Torres, M. E., Collett, T. S.,
Goldberg, D., Riedel, M., and Schultheiss, P. 2006. Gas Hydrates in Marine
Sediments; lessons From Scientific Ocean Drilling. Oceanography, Vol. 19, No.4,
pp. 124-142.
13
Walsh, F. B. 2006. The Kopanoar mud volcano on the Mackenzie shelf, Beaufort Sea;
Implications for Methane release on Arctic shelves. Honours Thesis, Department of Earth Sciences,
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, February 2006, 63 pages.
Walsh, F. B., and Scott, D. B. 2010. Foraminifera associated with the Kopanoar mud
Volcano and other “pingo-like” features on the Beaufort Shelf, Arctic Ocean:
Possible paleo-indicators of methane seeps. Paper in progress.
Wefer, G. 1976. Environmental effects on growth rates of benthic foraminifera (shallow
water, Baltic sea). 1st International Symposium on Benthonic Foraminifera of 0Continental
Margins, Part A. Ecology and Biology. Maritime Sediments, Special Publication, 1, pp. 39-50.