gps-based optimization of phev power demands in a cold weather city
DESCRIPTION
GPS-based Optimization of PHEV Power Demands in a Cold Weather City. Ryan Smith; Matthew Morison; David Capelle ; Caleigh Christie ; Danny Blair, Ph.D. University of Winnipeg’s Department of Geography. Introduction. What is a PHEV?. http://www.eeh.ee.ethz.ch/. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
GPS-based Optimization of PHEV Power Demands in a Cold
Weather City
Ryan Smith; Matthew Morison; David Capelle; Caleigh Christie; Danny Blair, Ph.D.
University of Winnipeg’s Department of Geography
Introduction
http://www.eeh.ee.ethz.ch/
What is a PHEV?
Introduction
• Power Requirements depend on Distance, Speed, Acceleration and Duration
• Time available for Battery Recharging
• Opportunity (daytime) charging
• At-home (evening) charging
How do you design a PHEV?
Purpose
• Modeling power demands of PHEVs under a variety of temperature and recharging scenarios to understand the environmental and economic benefits of PHEV use
• Using a duty cycle previously created from a real-time GPS-based dataset collected by the University of Winnipeg’s AUTO21 research team (Smith et al., 2011)
Vehicle Power Demand – the Duty Cycle
• A representative, 24-hour profile• Duty Cycles indicate:
– Typical speed and acceleration demands– Hours of the day vehicle is in operation– Number of Trips / Day– Time available for Recharging
• Derived: Multiple vehicles, thousands of trips over long periods of time
Participants• Seventy-six volunteer drivers collecting
GPS data while driving, from Winnipeg & nearby communities.
• One year period• Recruitment:
– Local media– Word-of mouth – Sample bias towards higher-income
households… a good thing?
Equipment
• 76 GPS receivers (Otto Driving Companion)– Store 300 hours of data @ one-second intervals– Plug-in to vehicle lighter socket– Transfer data to PC via USB cable
• Accuracy:– Position: 10 metres– Speed: 1 km/h
myottomate.com/checkoutotto.asp
WPG03 Duty Cycle
Modeling PHEV Power Demands
• 3 different types of PHEVs• 4 temperatures• 2 charging scenarios
Governing Equations
WPG03
VariedInputs
Go to…Power Demand Model
Results
Table 8: modeled gasoline and electricity demands of various PHEV models with overnight charging only using the WPG03PHEVx Ambient
Temperature (°C)
Electric range (km)
Gasoline range (km)
Electricity (DC)
(kWh)
Gas consumed
(L)
Fuel Economy
(L/100 km)
Electricity consumption
(Wh/km)
Electricty (AC)
(kWh)
Cost of charge (CAD)
(6.5¢/kWh)
Cost of gasoline (CAD)
(96¢/L)
Annual cost (CAD)
(240
cycles)CV 0 0.0 25.4 0.0 3.8 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 866.9
PHEV5 15 7.9 17.4 1.4 2.7 10.8 55.3 1.8 0.1 2.6 659.2PHEV5 0 7.6 17.7 1.4 2.8 10.9 55.3 1.8 0.1 2.6 661.3PHEV5 -15 8.1 17.2 1.4 2.7 10.9 55.3 1.8 0.1 2.6 660.5PHEV5 -30 7.2 18.1 1.4 2.7 10.8 55.3 1.8 0.1 2.6 658.7
PHEV10 15 16.1 9.3 2.8 1.7 6.8 111.5 3.5 0.2 1.6 449.1PHEV10 0 17.2 8.2 2.8 1.7 6.8 111.7 3.5 0.2 1.6 450.2PHEV10 -15 17.1 8.2 2.8 1.7 6.8 111.4 3.5 0.2 1.6 448.9PHEV 10 -30 15.9 9.4 2.8 1.7 6.8 111.4 3.5 0.2 1.6 448.9
PHEV20 15 24.7 0.6 4.7 0.4 1.5 183.6 5.8 0.4 0.4 176.4PHEV20 0 22.9 2.4 4.2 0.7 2.9 165.2 5.2 0.3 0.7 253.1PHEV20 -15 20.8 4.5 3.7 1.1 4.5 146.8 4.7 0.3 1.1 333.8PHEV20 -30 17.5 7.8 3.3 1.5 6.0 128.3 4.1 0.3 1.5 412.0
Cost Comparison for Overnight Charging Only
Table 9: modeled gasoline and electricity demands of various PHEV models with overnight charging and 3.5 hours opportunity charging using the WPG03PHEVx Ambient
Temperature (°C)
Electric range (km)
Gasoline range (km)
Electricity (DC)
(kWh)
Gas consumed
(L)
Fuel Economy
(L/100 km)
Electricity consumption
(Wh/km)
Electricty (AC)
(kWh)
Cost of charge (CAD)
(6.5¢/kWh)
Cost of gasoline
(CAD) (96¢/L)
Annual cost (CAD)
(240
cycles)PHEV5 15 16.9 8.4 2.8 1.6 6.4 110.7 3.5 0.2 1.6 430.1PHEV5 0 17.3 8.0 2.8 1.6 6.4 110.7 3.5 0.2 1.6 430.4PHEV5 -15 16.8 8.4 2.7 1.7 6.6 108.2 3.4 0.2 1.6 440.5PHEV5 -30 15.0 10.3 2.6 1.8 7.0 103.4 3.3 0.2 1.7 459.4
PHEV10 15 24.5 0.8 4.4 0.4 1.5 175.1 5.6 0.4 0.4 176.2PHEV10 0 22.7 2.5 4.0 0.7 2.8 159.2 5.1 0.3 0.7 243.3PHEV10 -15 20.4 4.9 3.6 1.1 4.3 141.0 4.5 0.3 1.0 321.7PHEV 10 -30 17.0 8.3 3.1 1.5 5.9 122.1 3.9 0.3 1.4 402.5
PHEV20 15 24.7 0.6 4.7 0.4 1.5 183.6 5.8 0.4 0.4 176.4PHEV20 0 22.9 2.4 4.2 0.7 2.9 165.2 5.2 0.3 0.7 253.1PHEV20 -15 20.8 4.5 3.7 1.1 4.5 146.8 4.7 0.3 1.1 333.8PHEV20 -30 17.5 7.8 3.3 1.5 6.0 128.3 4.1 0.3 1.5 412.0
Cost Comparison for Opportunity and Overnight Charging
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Conclusion• Cold temperatures affect vehicle operation
energy costs• Daytime opportunity charging dramatically
reduces energy costs• Large battery PHEVs (PHEV20) are not
optimal for the WPG03 • From engineering and consumer points of
view, optimization (on a per duty cycle basis) is necessary to realize the full environmental and economic benefits of PHEV technology.• Goldilocks effect
Acknowledgments
• Frank Franczyk, Persen Technologies Inc.• Department of Geography, University of Winnipeg
Funding and Support