good science vs. bad science h. smith. terminology hypothesis: statement which predicts what will...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Good Science vs. Bad Science
H. Smith
![Page 2: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Terminology• Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will
happen– Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break.
• Theory/Fact: generally accepted fact due to much, repeated evidence***still open to scientific inquiry b/c it’s not an absolute truth.– Ex: Gravity exists
• Opinions: non-measurable and impossible to prove, cannot be addressed by science – Ex: Pizza Hut has the best pizza in the world.
![Page 4: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Characteristics of Good Science:
• Good Science:– Follows the scientific method (at least loosely)• Observation• Research• Experimentation• Results• Analysis• Conclusion• PUBLISH!!!
![Page 5: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Characteristics of Good Science:
• Good Science:– Does not investigate opinions, must have disprovable
hypothesis– Ethical reports & procedures– Methods must be replicated many times with same result
(you can’t make up data!)– Has many scientists working on similar projects, to validate
data– Peer reviewed BEFORE publication– Publication in a peer reviewed journal=legitimate– Changes with new facts
![Page 6: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Can Science Investigate?
• Are tomatoes or carrots more delicious?
![Page 7: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Can Science Investigate?
• At what age do chickens start laying eggs?
![Page 8: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Can Science Investigate?
• Does Vitamin C shorten the time a cold affects a person?
![Page 9: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Can Science Investigate?
• Is it morally wrong to kill someone?
![Page 10: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Can Science Investigate?
• Is cell phone use correlated with cancer?
![Page 11: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Examples of Bad Science
• Ex 1: MMR Vaccine Health Scare– 1998 Dr. Andrew Wakefield– Published in the Lancet– Claimed MMR vaccine caused autism– Highly publicized by former model Jenny McCarthy– Discrediting began in 1999– Formally discredited in 2010; lost medical license– Wakefield “fixed” information, only 12 children.
![Page 12: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Why everyone has to vaccinate
• Herd immunity• True/False? If you are immunized you cannot
get that disease?
![Page 13: Good Science vs. Bad Science H. Smith. Terminology Hypothesis: statement which predicts what will happen – Ex: If I drop this beaker, then it will break](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022081822/5697bf741a28abf838c7f934/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Examples of Bad Science:
• Multi-vitamin use: based on 1 math mistake• Essentially no health benefits from taking a
multi-vitamin• Expensive urine• Actually useful vitamin supplements: Folic acid,Vitamin D & Vitamin B12• Not proven to improve health, may be harmful• Use the money to buy healthy food!