go to… version.7 copyright © 2013 by guy & heidi burgess overview timeline parties: a.1....
TRANSCRIPT
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward PACS 4500
Senior Seminar in Peace and Conflict Studies
Death from Above:Drone Strikes by the United States in the Global War
on Terrorism
By John Wilson
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Overview of Principle Parties / Interest Groups
2. CiviliansEffected by
strikes
1. Anti – Western
Extremists
1. The United States
Government
4. Non-governmental organizations / Think Tanks
3. Governments of countries where drone strikes occur
2. Non-governmental organizations /
Think Tanks
3 . Allies of the United
States
Drone and Weapons
Manufacturers
3. Public Opinion of civilians in
countries where strikes occur
1. Western media
2. Public Opinion of American citizens
A: Pro- Drone Strikes B: Anti- Drone Strikes
Third Siders
Profiteers
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Timeline
Sept. 11th 2001 terrorist attacks prompt US invasion of Afghanistan
Taliban are quickly defeated and ousted from power Taliban fighters flee to neighboring Pakistan where the Federally
Administered Tribal Area (FATA) provide a safe refuge for Taliban fighters
The United States is faced with an insurgency where the enemy fighters have a safe refuge to fight from
The inability to decisively defeat the Taliban draw the U.S. into a war that increases Anti-Western radicalism around the world in countries such as: Somalia, Libya and Yemen.
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Timeline Continued
2004 – First drone strike in Pakistan successful kills enemy insurgents and drone strikes become an option for killing enemy across the legal border of Pakistan
2008 – President Obama loosens the targeting requirements for drone strikes from “known enemy combatants” to “suspected enemy combatants.” As a result, drone strikes in Pakistan increase dramatically
2013 – U.S. Air Force stops releasing public reports of drone strikes. Drone strikes continue to increase in Afghanistan and are
expected to continue to increase as U.S. forces withdraw
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
A. 1. The United State Government
It is the job of President Obama, as Commander and Chief of the U.S. Military, to defend the U.S. from terrorism
Drone strikes are used to eliminate individuals suspected as a threat to the USA
Drone strikes are used to eliminate terrorist threats that are in areas inaccessible to U.S. Military forces
The U.S. government views civilian casualties to be an unfortunate but acceptable side effect of the drone strikes
Data provided by the U.S. government regarding drone strikes shows a high degree of accuracy and civilian casualties to be very low
The attacks of September 11th targeted American civilians and the grievances caused from those attacks allow the U.S. government to be less sympathetic to civilian deaths caused by drone attacks
Drone Strikes are popular because they don’t require troop commitment and don’t directly endanger military personnel
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
A. 2. Non-Governmental Organizations and Think Tanks
Pro-drone strike think tanks provide data that supports the use of drone strikes• Data shows high enemy kill rates and very low civilian death rates
This conservative data is then used by members in the U.S. government and western media sources to garner support for drone strikes
Click here to go to Website
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
A. 3. Allies of the United States
The governments of Allies to the U.S. involved in the Global War on Terrorism are supportive of drone strikes
The United Kingdom is the primary ally of the United States and has also conducted drone strikes with Royal Air Force aircraft
The UK has had more terrorist attacks (although they have been much less deadly) on its soil by anti–Western extremists and therefore has a vested interest in fighting terrorism. The values, positions and interests of the UK are very similar (if not identical) to those of the United States
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
B. 1. Anti Western Extremists
Anti–Western extremists are the target of drone strikes by the United States
These extremists usually practice a radical version of Islam that calls on its followers to attack Western countries in the name of religion
The deep rooted religious aspect of the extremists makes negotiation and collaboration very difficult
The main interest of these extremists is to eradicate all western influences from their Holy Land, which generally means Middle Eastern countries
Grievances against the US have resulted mainly from the oil industry
Anti-US grievances have been exacerbated by U.S. involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts
Right: Abu Yahya al-Libi. Possible successor to Osama Bin Laden. Killed by a drone strike on June 4, 2012
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
B. 2. Civilians Effected by Strikes
Civilian can be affected directly by the strikes by injury, loss of loved ones, displacement and loss of infrastructure, psychological damage, and death
Civilians effected by the strikes create and reinforce anti-U.S. grievances and are counter-productive to a counterterrorism initiative.
Left: A protest in reaction to drone strikes killing civilians
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
B. 3. Governments of Countries Where Drone Strikes Occur Just like the U.S. government, governments in countries where strike
occur have a responsibility to protect their citizens and drone strikes challenge that responsibility
Drone strikes challenge the government’s sovereignty as they are conducted without the permission from the government in which they occur
The country most affected by drone strikes is Pakistan, where insurgents reside in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA)
The issue is not entirely clear cut for these governments: the Pakistani government is publicly against the attacks but is rumored to support the attacks in secret
Drone strikes often occur in areas where the government does not have regional control and although governments may speak out against the drone strikes they may reluctantly support them in secret due to the radical threat to their own country
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
B. 4. Non-Governmental Organizations and Think Tanks
Studies done by organizations not supported by the United States Government report high civilian death rates
A common figure for actual high value targets killed in drone strikes is less than 2%
These groups are usually focused on seeking the truth in conflict and seeking an end to violence against innocent civilians.
“Living Under Drones” is published by Stanford Law School and NYU school of Law
Click here to view the website
• For a report of every drone strike in Pakistan go to: drones.pitchinteractive.com
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
3rd Sider – 1. Western Media
Western media (the big six corporations that control about 90% of the media in the United States) tend to report on drone strikes in a manner that makes them seem effective in fighting the war on terror• Reports are inline with U.S. government reports
Full info graphic available at frugaldad.com
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
3rd Sider – 2. Public Opinion of American citizens
• The size and diversity of the U.S. citizenry cannot allow for a single analysis but lack of an opposition voice to drone strikes suggests that most people in the U.S. either support the drone strikes or are uninformed / apathetic to the issue
• Factors that contribute to American public support of drone strikes include:• Grievances resulting from the Sept. 11 attacks• Fear of another terrorist attack• Western media (both in portrayal of Anti U.S. radicals and
effectiveness of drone strikes)• Following Presidential leadership
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
3rd Sider - 3. Public Opinion of Civilians in Countries Where Strikes Occur
This group is separate from civilians effected by the strikes in that that there are not directly effected by drone strikes
Some civilians are in favor or drone strikes, especially if they are against extremists in their country
Overall, drone strikes decease public opinion of the United States A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center shows that
public opinion of the U.S. has decreased with the increase in drone strikes
74% of Pakistanis call America an enemy
Click here to see the full report
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Profiteers: Drone and Weapons Manufacturers
• General Atomic produces the Predator and Reaper drones, the main unmanned aerial vehicles that conduct these strikes. The Predator costs around $4 million and the Reaper about $30 million
• According to Opensecrets.org, General Atomics spent over $3 million on campaign contributions and lobbying in the U.S. in 2013. This influence can be seen as a reinforcement mechanism for drone attacks
Click here to go to website
• Weapons costs for the payloads of drones range from $25,000 to $150,000. The most common weapon is the Hellfire missile produced by Lockheed Martin, a known heavy hitter in U.S. lobbying. Lockheed spend over $15 million lobbing in 2012
Click here to go to website
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Legend
Friend
Ally
Adversary
Enemy
Neutral
Other (Mark, Client?)
Exacerbating Dynamic
Ameliorating Dynamic
Danger Point
Causality
Positive: an increase in A causes an increase in B
Negative: an increase in A causes a decrease in B
Party AGroup 1
Party BGroup 1
Negative feedback system (de-escalation)
orPositive feedback system (escalation)
This legend will assist in understanding the dynamics in the following slides
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Drone Strike Dynamics: Main Conflict
The United States
Government
Anti – Western Extremists
Increase in grievances
against the US
DRONE STRIKESDrone strikes create a reinforcing feedback
loop that increases the animosity between Anti-Western Extremists and
the U.S. Government
The increase in grievances against the U.S. by those effected by drone strikes
results in increased fear in the United States and thus
more drone strikes
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Drone Strike Dynamics: Pro-Drone Strike Side
Drone and Weapons
Manufacturers
Allies of the United States
Non-governmental organizations /
Think Tanks(Pro drone strikes)
Western media(Pro drone
strikes)
Public Opinion of American
citizens
The United States
Government
This map shows a reinforcement of support from drone strikes within the pro-drone strike side
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Drone Strike Dynamics: Anti- Drone Strike Side
Anti – Western
Extremists
CiviliansEffected by
strikes
Non-governmental organizations / Think
Tanks(Against drone Strikes)
Governments of countries where
drone strikes occur
Dynamic V
aries
Public Opinion of Civilians in
countries where strikes occur
This map shows a reinforcement of support
against drone strikes on the anti- drone strike side.
The relationship between governments and anti-western extremists varies between ally
and enemy.
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Drone Strike Dynamics Across Sides
Public Opinion of American citizens
The United States
Government
CiviliansEffected by
strikes
Non-governmental organizations / Think
Tanks(Against drone Strikes)
Dynamic
Varies
This map shows that civilian casualties can decrease support of drone strikes in the United States though reporting from non-governmental organizations and think tanks that are against drone strikes. However this dynamic must be stronger than the reinforcing dynamic seen on the pro-drone strike slide
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Arguments and Counterarguments for Drone Strikes
Drone strikes do not risk U.S. military personnel
• U.S. military personnel are killed in retribution attacks after drone strikes. The recent increase in “insider attacks” against U.S. military personnel are a clear example
Civilian casualty rates are misleading. Many “civilians” are enemy insurgents because bad guys tend to be surrounded by other bad guys
• While this is true, bad guys also surround themselves with innocent women and children
The blowback from civilian casualties is acceptable given the danger posed by the enemy killed
• There has not been another successful attack on U.S. soil since Sept.11th and drone strikes have likely stopped such an attack. However, this does not mean that the world is safer due to the high number of drone strikes
Drone strikes have unfortunate consequences, but they are the best solution to the problem of the FATA
• This is a popular argument but it is clearly flawed. One better solution would be to better support the Pakistani government in apprehending and prosecuting radicals who pose a threat to the United States
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Path Forward
Dealing with Drone Strikes can be categorized into three main areas:
1. Ending drone strikes that kill civilians
2. Establishing alternatives to dealing with anti-western extremists
3. Deal with the negative consequences of drone strikes
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Ending Drone Strikes That Kill Civilians
Targeting requirements for drone strikes must include only killing known enemy combatants
Military personnel on the ground must confirm the identity and location of enemy combatants before drone strike are authorized• This means drone strikes can only occur in countries where the
United States has committed troops
Drone strikes should only be used when piloted air support is not available
There needs to be an overall reduction in the reliance of air support by U.S. military personnel in theater
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Alternatives to Drone Strikes
Alternatives to dealing with anti-western extremism must take a system based approach that looks at the core issues of the problem. Some examples of core issues are:
• Inequality and poverty
• Inability for countries like Pakistan to secure tribal regions
• United States dependence on oil
Some possible ways to deal with the above core issues:
Humanitarian aid and economic development programs in areas that harbor anti-western extremists
Work with governments like Pakistan to secure lawless areas through internal support
Seek alternative sources of energy outside of the Middle East
Go To…
Version .7Copyright© 2013 by
Guy & HeidiBurgess
OverviewTimelineParties:
A.1.A.2.A.3.B.1B.2
B.3.B.4
3rd Siders:1.2.3.
ProfiteersLegend
Dynamics:Main ConflictPro-Drone StrikeAnti-Drone
StrikeAcross Sides
Arguments
Path Forward
Dealing With the Aftermath
Drone strikes have caused considerable damage in foreign relations of the United States and people who have been negatively effected by drone strikes
Action must be taken to prevent the spread of anti-western extremism as a result of drone strikes
Possible actions: Trauma healing initiatives Truth and reconciliation commissions Community dialogs