gm and bio fuels mary beth stanek october 2, 2006

17
GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Upload: moris-greer

Post on 11-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

GM and Bio Fuels

Mary Beth Stanek

October 2, 2006

Page 2: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 2

General Motors Commitment

Implement Propulsion Technologies that improve fuel efficiency and reduce environmental impact

Work to assure that new propulsion and fuel technologies are linked

Promote the use of alternative fuels that make sense economically and environmentally including biofuels and hydrogen

Page 3: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 3

HydrogenFuel Cell

Hybrid ElectricVehicles

Incremental Internal Combustion Engine and Transmission

Improvements

Near-Term Mid-Term Long-Term

ReducedEmissions

and IncreasedVehicle Fuel

Economy

ReducedPetroleum

Consumption

Cleaner HC Fuels,

Renewable Fuels

Hydrogen Infrastructure

Biofuels

Advanced Propulsion Technology Strategy

Page 4: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 4

GM Perspective on EthanolOpportunity Renewable. Reduce U.S. dependence on oil – “Grown in America” appeal. High octane consumer alternative to gasoline Potential to displace significant amounts of petroleum. Greenhouse gas benefit – depending on production methods and raw materials employed. Infrastructure issues much simpler and less costly than gaseous alternative fuels (CNG,

LPG, Hydrogen). U.S. Job Creation

Challenge Low concentration ethanol blends (E10, E6) present emission challenges. High concentration blend (E85) consumer availability is limited, infrastructure needed. Reduced volumetric fuel economy (miles per gallon) immediately observed by customer in

typical E85 Flex Fuel Vehicles (FFVs). Near term pricing

Page 5: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 5

U.S. Fuel Ethanol Growth

Sources: GM Internal and Jim Jordan and Associates, April 2006

Ethanol Capacity and Demand in the United States

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

(000

) B

arre

ls p

er D

ay

---4.0

---3.0

---2.0

--- 0

---5.0

---6.0

---7.0

---1.0

---8.0

Billio

ns o

f Gallo

ns p

er Year

CAPACITYEXISTING & ANNOUNCED

ENERGY

BILL

RFS

DEMAND

PRESENT USES

---9.0

--10.0

35 Building

55 "Probable"

64 "Uncertain"

95 Existing

ADD ALLRFG

AREAS

--11.0

--12.0

April, 2006

--13.0

(CORN ETHANOL PLANTS)

Page 6: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 6

61%35%

4%

GMR Practical Estimate of Potential U.S. Ethanol (Portion of U.S. Light-Duty Fuels - Year 2020)

All percentages are on an energy equivalent basisBased on University of Toronto data

Gasoline CellulosicEthanol

CropResidue

Forest/Mill

EnergyCrops

MSW

GrainEthanol 11%

15%

3%6%

Page 7: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 7

Page 8: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 8

Reductions in Per-Mile GHG Emissions by Ethanol Blend to Displace Gasoline

Source : Argonne National Laboratory - Wang

Ethanol Blends, Especially E85 Made from Cellulosic Ethanol, Can Significantly Reduce GHG Emissions

-2% -2%-6%

-23%-17%

-64%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

E10 GV: DM

E10 GV: WM

E10 GV: Cell.

E85 FFV: DM

E85 FFV: WM

E85 FFV: Cell.

Page 9: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 9

-120,000

-100,000

-80,000

-60,000

-40,000

-20,000

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Net

En

erg

y V

alu

e (B

tu/g

allo

n)

Ho

Marland&Turhollow

Pim ente l

Pim ente lKeeney&DeLuca

Lorenz&Morris

Shapouri e t al.

Wang et al.

Agri. Canada

Kim &DaleGraboski

Wang

Pim ente l

Shapouri e t al.

Pim ente l&Patzek

Weinblatt e t al.

NR Canada

Cham bers et al.

Patzek

DelucchiKim &Dale

Wan

g

GR

EE

T

w/P

imen

tel

Ass

um

pti

on

s

Energy balance here is defined as Btu content a gallon of ethanol minus fossil energy used to produce a gallon of ethanol

Most of the Recent Corn EtOH Studies Show a Positive Net Energy Balance

Source : Argonne National Laboratory - Wang

Page 10: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 10

2007 Model Year U.S. FFV offerings2007 E85 vehicles (16 Models):

Chevrolet Silverado 5.3L V-8 engine (LMG)

GMC Sierra 5.3L V-8 engine (LMG)

Chevrolet Avalanche 5.3L V-8 engine (LMG or LC9)

Chevrolet Tahoe 5.3L V-8 engine (LMG)

GMC Yukon 5.3L V-8 engine (LMG)

Chevrolet Suburban 5.3L V-8 engine (LMG or LC9)

GMC Yukon XL 5.3L V-8 engine (LMG or LC9)

Chevrolet Impala 3.5L V-6 engine (LZE)

Chevrolet Monte Carlo 3.5L V-6 engine (LZE)

Chevrolet Express 5.3L V-8 engine (L59)

GMC Savanna 5.3L V-8 engine (L59)

Chevrolet Silverado Classic 5.3L V-8 engine (L59)

GMC Sierra Classic 5.3L V-8 engine (L59)

Chevrolet Uplander 3.9L V-6 engine (LGD)

Pontiac Montana 3.9L V-6 engine (LGD) (Offered only in Canada and Mexico by special order)

Buick Terraza 3.9L V-6 engine (LGD)

Page 11: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 11

Yellow cap

Flex fuel badging

Introduced e85- TV, print and radio campaign “Live Green Go Yellow”

Educational Livegreengoyellow.com web site created

New e85 autoshow exhibit incorporated

LiveGreenGoYellow street marketing teams

Extensive dealer training and IDL broadcast

Chevy and GMC in-showroom point-of-sale materials

Earth day initiative

Celebrity placement of Chevy and GMC Flex Fuel vehicles

Owner direct mail e85 campaign

Extensive in-school (grades 5-8) education program

Marketing

Page 12: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 12

LiveGreenGoYellow.com Record 1,500,000 site visits in 2 weeks; 2/19 – nearly 100,000

visits/day; achieved 64% more visits in a 2-week period than all of 2005 for GM Ability

Exit rate of 20% vs. 35% average indicating high interest

Page 13: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 13

Chicago Auto Show

Page 14: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 14

West to East Partnership Advertising

Page 15: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Marketing, Communications, and

Partnering

Page 16: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 16

West to East PartnershipAgreements

GM & VeraSun May, 2005 SD GM, Chevron & State of CA Jan, 2006 CA GM & VeraSun, GM & Shell Feb, 2006 IL GM & VeraSun Mar, 2006 MN GM, Kroger, Abengoa & State of TX Mar, 2006 TX GM, Meijer, CleanFuelUSA & State of MI Apr, 2006 MI GM, Meijer & State of Indiana May, 2006 IN GM, Kroger & State of Ohio July 2006 OH GM, VeraSun & State of PA July 2006 PA GM, Inland Food & State of Florida Aug 2006 FL

Page 17: GM and Bio Fuels Mary Beth Stanek October 2, 2006

Page 17

2006 Ethanol ActivitiesGovernors Ethanol Coalition Implemented 28 vehicle E85

FFV demonstration fleet in 2005

RFA, NEVC, CFDC included in demonstration fleet deployment

Supported significant GEC vehicle media events in 10 states

Extension and refresh announced in Texas in March 2006