giving me fits: improved detection of subtle abnormalities in epilepsy elliott friedman and maria...
TRANSCRIPT
Giving Me Fits: Improved Detection of Subtle Abnormalities in Epilepsy
Elliott Friedman and Maria Olga Patino
eEdE-07
No disclosures
Objectives• To improve accuracy of MRI interpretation in patients with epilepsy,
focusing on subtle epileptogenic lesions and MRI protocol optimization.
• All of the imaging cases in this presentation contain abnormalities that were not fully appreciated at the time of initial imaging interpretation.
• We will focus on these imaging pitfalls to improve diagnosis of epileptogenic lesions, allowing radiologists to generate more accurate and useful imaging reports, improving patient care.
Introduction
• Epilepsy is the fourth most common neurologic disorder in the United States and Europe. One in 26 people will develop epilepsy during their lifetime.
• Eligibility for resections of neocortical focal epilepsies are highly dependent on the identification of a lesion on imaging.
• Detection of an epileptogenic lesion on MRI improves the prognosis for long-term seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery.
• The most common reasons that detectable epileptogenic lesions are underreported on MRI is because the imaging does not adequately delineate the lesion, or an incomplete search pattern of the interpreting radiologist.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
1.5 T v 3 T
1.5 T3 T
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
1.5 T v 3 T
T1-weighted 3 Tesla images more clearly depict the bilateral occipital supependymal heterotopia (arrows), which is inconspicuous on the 1.5 Tesla scan.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
1.5 T v 3 T
1.5 T 3 T
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
1.5 T v 3 T
1.5 T 3 T
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
1.5 T v 3 T
1.5 T 3 T
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
1.5 T v 3 T
1.5 T 3 T
Extensive right hemispheric polymicrogyria which is more clearly delineated on the 3T scan.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
1.5 T v 3 T
• When patient safety allows, epilepsy imaging should be performed on a 3 Tesla scanner.
• Improved signal to noise ratio of 3T MRI provides better resolution and image quality, and has been shown to more effectively detect and characterize structural lesions.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
1.5 T v 3 T
• Image quality on 1.5T scanners can vary by scanner and technique.
• Both sets of T1-weighted images were obtained on 1.5T scanners, but gray-white distinction is not perceptible on the images to the left, and these images are not sufficient to evaluate for cortical abnormalities.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 3D T1
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
Diffuse posterior laminar heterotopia (arrows) is only conspicuous on the 3D T1 gradient echo sequence (MPRAGE, 3D SPGR) which optimizes contrast between the gray and white matter.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
Compare the resolution of the heterotopia on the 3D T1 sequence (Fig. 2) with the T1 SE sequence (Fig. 1) performed as part of the same
study.
• High resolution 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequence (MPRAGE, SPGR) optimizes T1 contrast and signal to noise ratio, providing high spatial resolution.
• Improves sensitivity for detection and delineation of white matter heterotopias and dysplasias.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
High resolution T1 sequence
T2 Flair
3D T1
Right frontal parasagittal focal cortical dysplasia (arrows). The 3D T1-weighted sequence more clearly delineates the subcortical extent of abnormality.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Sagittal flair cube sequence
Axial and coronal T2 Flair
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Sagittal flair cube sequence
Sagittal volumetric T2 Flair
The volumetric sagittal flair cube sequence demonstrates hyperintense subcortical signal wrapping around the affected gyrus and radiating to the lateral ventricle, which was much less conspicuous on the
routine axial and coronal T2 sequences. Pathologically proven Type IIB Focal cortical dysplasia
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Sagittal flair cube sequence
Coronal T2 Flair
Axial T2 Flair
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Sagittal flair cube sequence
Sagittal Flair cube
The bottom of sulcus dysplasia is obvious on the sagittal 3D flair sequence but less
conspicuous on the routine axial and coronal T2 flair sequences (arrows next
slide).
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Sagittal flair cube sequence
Coronal T2 Flair
Axial T2 Flair
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Sagittal flair cube sequence
• A volumetric sagittal T2 Flair (1 mm isotropic voxels) or a sagittal double inversion recovery sequence more clearly demonstrate some subtle focal cortical dysplasias, such as bottom of sulcus dysplasias.
• Bottom of sulcus dysplasias are important cortical developmental malformations to recognize because these lesions can be highly epileptogenic and prognosis for seizure freedom is excellent after resection; however they are often subtle on routine imaging due to their location and small size.
• Imaging features of bottom of sulcus dysplasia include: cortical thickening, gray-white matter blurring, and increased T2 signal in the subcortical white matter and cortex centered at the bottom of a sulcus, sometimes with associated gyral abnormality and sulcal widening, and a funnel-shaped tail of signal extending towards the ependymal surface.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Subtle cortical abnormalities
Axial and coronal T2 Flair
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Subtle cortical abnormalities
FDG PET obtained one hour following a seizure demonstrates focal increased activity in the left posterior insular cortex (arrow).
Review of T2 Flair images with narrow
windows (upper images) is critical to detect subtle white
matter abnormalities. Arrows point to a
subtle focus of subcortical T2 hyperintensity,
pathologically proven type IIA Focal Cortical
dysplasia.
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Subtle cortical abnormalities
Coronal T2
Axial T2
Coronal T2 Flair
Subtle focus of hypointense signal in the left temporal opercular cortex (yellow
arrows) and subtle focus of subcortical T2 hyperintensity (blue arrow). Pathology
revelealed meningiomatosis and cortical dysplasia in the superior temporal gyrus.
Anterior temporal lobe changes
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Axial T2
Anterior temporal lobe changes
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Coronal T2
Anterior temporal lobe changes
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
FDG PET
Anterior temporal lobe white matter changes include: anterior temporal lobe volume loss, increased T2 signal intensity in the white matter core, and loss of gray-white distinction. FDG PET
demonstrates diffusely decreased activity in the left anterior temporal lobe (blue arrows).
Anterior temporal lobe changes
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
• Morphologic changes of the anterior temporal lobe occur in persons with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy with or without hippocampal sclerosis.
• Frequently overlooked finding on MRI.
• Increased T2 signal in the white matter core in association with anterior temporal lobe atrophy.
• Signal changes may reflect increased water content, possibly due to myelin abnormality, but not believed to be related to gliosis.
Meningoencephalocele
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Left middle cranial fossa meningoencephalocele (yellow arrows).
Asymmetric decreased size and blurring in the left hippocampus, pathologically
proven Ammon’s horn sclerosis.
Meningoencephalocele
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Multiple small meningoencephaloceles in the
left middle cranial fossa (arrows)
Meningoencephalocele
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
• Many epilepsy protocols only include high resolution coronal images through the hippocampal formations.
• This effectively excludes the anterior aspect of the middle cranial fossa, a common location for encephaloceles.
63 yo woman with a 5 year history of medically refractory seizures, initially attributed to a prior stroke.
Initial image from the coronal oblique sequence of a prior MRI, interpreted as negative, because the abnormality was outside of the field of view.
Meningoencephalocele
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 6Case 5Case 4
Axial and coronal T2-weighted images obtained approximately one year later using a volumetric sequence through the whole brain clearly demonstrate the transalar meningoencephalocele and associated dysplastic brain.
High resolution coronal or coronal oblique T2-weighted imaging must be acquired through the whole brain as part of any epilepsy protocol.
Conclusions• You CANNOT report what you CANNOT see.
• Effective imaging evaluation of epilepsy requires a dedicated epilepsy protocol MRI optimized for detection of subtle lesions as well as an awareness of commonly overlooked lesions.
• Meticulous inspection and narrow display windows improve detection of subtle lesions.
• Detecting the epileptogenic lesion improves the prognosis for long-term seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery.
ReferencesGarbelli R, Milesi G, Medici V, et al. Blurring in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: clinical, high-field imaging and ultrastructural study. Brain. 2012; 135: 2337-2349.
Hesdorffer DC, Logroscino G, Benn EK, et al. Estimating risk for developing epilepsy. A population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota. Neurol 2011; 76:23-27.
Hofman PA, Fitt GJ, Harvey AS, et al. Bottom-of-sulcus Dysplasia: Imaging Features. AJR 2011; 196: 881-885.
Mitchell LA, Jackson GD, et al. Anterior temporal lobe abnormality in temporal lobe epilepsy: a quantitative MRI and histopathologic study. Neurol 1999; 52:327-336.
Phal P, Usmanov A, Nesbit G, et al. Quantitiative comparison of 3T and 1.5T MRI in evaluation of epilepsy. AJR. 2008; 191: 890-895.
Tellez-Zenteno J, Ronquillo L, Moein-Afshari F, et al. Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epil Res. 2010; 89: 310-318.