giscience and cybergis

31
GIScience and CyberGIS Michael F. Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara

Upload: zelda

Post on 25-Feb-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

GIScience and CyberGIS. Michael F. Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara. The vision of CI-supported science. Teams studying complex questions distributed across disciplines with disparate practices distributed geographically with powerful communication links - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GIScience and CyberGIS

GIScience and CyberGIS

Michael F. GoodchildUniversity of California

Santa Barbara

Page 2: GIScience and CyberGIS

The vision of CI-supported science• Teams studying complex questions

– distributed across disciplines• with disparate practices

– distributed geographically• with powerful communication links• perhaps distributed temporally as well

• Access to vast repositories of data– possibly real-time– using powerful search tools– with comprehensive documentation

• metadata, provenance, etc.

Page 3: GIScience and CyberGIS

More on the vision• Access to powerful software tools

– manipulation, analysis, modeling– interoperable

• easy to match to data

• Powerful computation– supercomputers

• Well-connected communities– skilled in the use of CI– easy recruitment, team formation

• Efficient methods of knowledge sharing

Page 4: GIScience and CyberGIS

What’s special about spatial?• Vision is generic

– is there a specifically spatial perspective?• a specific case for cyberGIS?

• In some ways GIS is already ahead of the field– National Spatial Data Infrastructure 1993– metadata since 1992– geolibraries since 1993, geoportals– OGC standards (WMS, etc.)– a tradition of data sharing

• much in the public domain, Feist, etc.

Page 5: GIScience and CyberGIS

Community engagement• GIS functions available to all• People love maps• VGI• But in the scientific community

– generalizing away from space and time– variable takeup of GIS– a belief that it is intuitively obvious

• no widely recognized theory or principles• reluctance to see GIS as comparable to e.g. statistics

Page 6: GIScience and CyberGIS

Elements of a geospatial CI• Base mapping

– easy-to-use mapping tools• Google Maps API, ArcGIS Online• boundary files

• Gazetteers, point-of-interest databases– geonames.org, Google Maps API, etc.– interoperability of georeferencing styles

• Geocoding services• Powerful analysis packages

– GeoDa, ArcGIS, R, Matlab, etc.

Page 7: GIScience and CyberGIS

maps.google.com

Page 8: GIScience and CyberGIS

raconline.org

Page 9: GIScience and CyberGIS

www.csiss.org

Page 10: GIScience and CyberGIS

More elements• Geodemographics

– Census data mapping– PRIZM, Tapestry, etc.

• National Spatial Data Infrastructure– 7 base layers

Page 11: GIScience and CyberGIS

So why the interest in cyberGIS?• Speedup?

– how much effort is a speedup worth?• Scale

– being able to perform simulations and develop models on n = 106+ elements

– making scale explicit• and addressing the MAUP and ecological fallacy

Page 12: GIScience and CyberGIS

Because we can avoid shortcuts• No need for Pythagorean distances

– all analysis on a curved Earth– new methods needed

• No need to divide and conquer– small study areas

• difficult to generalize from

• No need to restrict to least squares– use nonlinear optimization

• No need for parametric inferential statistics– use simulation and randomization tests

Page 13: GIScience and CyberGIS

More reasons for interest• Because the Earth’s systems really are

parallel– humans and communities are semi-independent

agents making simultaneous decisions– but conventional computing is serial– the architecture of cyberGIS can be closer to the

architecture of the real world’s processes• Because today’s science problems really are

more complex– requiring multidisciplinary, distributed teams

Page 14: GIScience and CyberGIS

New kinds of data• Big Data• Closer to real-time• Vastly increased volume• Poor and diminishing quality control

– from disparate sources– no lengthy synthesis by experts– no metadata or provenance

• Need to automate quality control– and the production of metadata and provenance

Page 15: GIScience and CyberGIS

The characteristics of Big Data• Volume

– peta-, exabyte scale– zetta (1021)– yotta (1024)

• the mass of the Earth is 5,973.6 Yg

• Velocity– rapid change, speed of analysis

• Variety– many sources– varied quality

Page 16: GIScience and CyberGIS

New kinds of analysis• Of data with unknown or variable quality• More suited to hypothesis generation than

hypothesis testing– the softer end of science– exploration, sampling design– induction

• An increased role for machine learning

Page 17: GIScience and CyberGIS

Challenging the norms of science• Collective responsibility

– plagiarism• The black box

– impossible to know all details of a project• Replicability

– impossible to report in sufficient detail• Experimental design• Poor data

– and therefore poor results

Page 18: GIScience and CyberGIS

New concepts of knowledge• David Weinberger, Too Big to Know• A strong legacy

– academic advancement• No stop events

– publication• All knowledge is contested• All knowledge is uncertain

Page 19: GIScience and CyberGIS

Selling the vision• Why is cyberGIS important?

– because it enables new applications, new discoveries

– possibilities that were not realized before• Has the case been made?

– or is this a matter of faith?• We need a set of compelling examples

– of what could not be done without cyberGIS

Page 20: GIScience and CyberGIS
Page 21: GIScience and CyberGIS

Accessibility• CyberGIS must be more accessible than GIS

– to a larger user community– advanced technology tends to move initially in the

opposite direction– only then will users be motivated to adopt

• Shorter learning curve• More intuitive user interfaces• Interoperable across more knowledge

communities• How accessible is GIS?

Page 22: GIScience and CyberGIS

The user interface problem• To support CyberGIS, service-oriented

architectures, discovery of services, interdisciplinary research– we must formalize functionality– a common language to describe operations– interoperability across functions– a radically different user interface

• In 40 years of GIS development this has not been achieved– functionality is ad hoc, legacy, artifactual

Page 23: GIScience and CyberGIS

Title Count of functions

3D Analyst Tools 34Analysis Tools 19Cartography Tools 43Conversion Tools 46Data Interoperability Tools 2Data Management Tools 178Editing Tools 7Geocoding Tools 7Geostatistical Analyst Tools 22Linear Referencing Tools 7Multidimension Tools 7Network Analyst Tools 21Parcel Fabric Tools 4Schematics Tools 5Server Tools 14Spatial Analyst Tools 171Spatial Statistics Tools 26Tracking Analyst Tools 2Total 615

Page 24: GIScience and CyberGIS

Questions users want to ask• To answer Question A you need to use

Function B– or Function B1 followed by Function B2 followed

by Function B3…

Page 25: GIScience and CyberGIS
Page 26: GIScience and CyberGIS

The Andy Mitchell books• Mitchell A. The ESRI guide to GIS analysis. I.

Geographic patterns and relationships. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press; 1995.

• Mitchell A. The ESRI guide to GIS analysis. II. Spatial measurements and statistics. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press; 2005.

• Mitchell A. The ESRI guide to GIS analysis. III. Modeling suitability, movement, and interaction. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press; 2012.

Page 27: GIScience and CyberGIS

Topics of Volume I• Mapping Where Things Are• Mapping the Most and Least• Mapping Density• Finding What’s Inside• Finding What’s Nearby• Mapping Change

Page 28: GIScience and CyberGIS

If you had an infinite supply of computing power how would you

deploy it?• On bigger simulation models?• On synthesizing and analyzing larger

quantities of data?• On tools to allow researchers to collaborate

better?• On making the user interface more

accessible?

Page 29: GIScience and CyberGIS

Meet Dr Geo Analytics• Ask Geo

– Where are the counties with the highest percent uninsured?

– Do these tend to be rural counties?– How is x related to y?

• when x and y have different spatial support?

Page 30: GIScience and CyberGIS

Towards a successful CyberGIS• Think like a user

– as well as a technically expert GIScientist• Understand why CyberGIS is important

– and how to argue that• to an anthropologist or an ecologist• in 30 seconds

• Simplify– the product must be easy to learn and use

• as well as powerful and scientifically rigorous

• Think ahead– today’s technologies will evolve

Page 31: GIScience and CyberGIS

CyberGIS as a game-changer• Rethinking many aspects of GIS• Changing traditional practices• Asking new questions

– be willing to move beyond the old questions– Galileo’s telescope allowed him to ask new

questions• Creating new priorities• A powerful vision

– and a wealth of opportunity