gina o connor_rpi
TRANSCRIPT
Gina Colarelli O’ConnorAssociate Professor
Director, Radical Innovation Research Program
So what is a ‘culture of innovation,’anyway?
2
Radical Innovation Research Program, Phase II
• Objective: To understand how organizations can systematically develop, evolve and sustain their radical innovation competencies.– What firms are doing to develop and support radical innovation, as a
distinctive activity, requiring distinctive management techniques:• Leadership and Culture• Organizational Structure and Interfaces• Governance and Decision Making• Specific Processes and Tools• Skills• Metrics
• Mechanisms to enhance an organization’s RI capability. • Most effective implementation techniques for instituting
those mechanisms.
Corporate Capability Development for the Management of Radical Innovation
Management System
Elements
3
Companies in the Study
IBMGEAir ProductsDuPontAnalog DevicesPolaroidNortel NetworksOtis Elevator (UTC)TIGM
3MAlbany Int’lCorningShell ChemicalsKodakMead-WestvacoSealed AirJ&J Consumer
BoseDow CorningGuidantH-PIntelP&GPPGRohm&HaasXerox
Cohort I1995 to 2000
Cohort II2001-2005
Cohort III2004 to 2005
Phase I Phase II
246 interviews
4
Agenda
• Is a ‘culture of innovation’ enough?
• Cultural differences that really matter.
• Cultural differences that do not really matter.
• A systems approach and cultural challenges.
5
Is a Culture of Innovation Enough?
Clear Strategic Mandate Culture of Innovation
Organizational Approach
Local Approach Whole Systems Approach
RRadicalness
# of Firms
Whole Systems Mandate
CultureLocal Mandate
6
Cultural Differences that Matter
• Orientation to Talent – Only some people can be successful in innovation
space vs. most everyone can be and should be multi-dextrous.
• Network Richness (vs. Network sterility)– Many contacts and ability to tap expertise of internal
and external networks. • Resource Fluidity (vs. Rigidity)
– Flexibility to borrow and trade the right people.• Organizational Fluidity (vs. Rigidity)
– Ability to create new structures to accommodate new businesses that do not fit.
7
RI System Capabilities Emphasis:
4 ApproachesCompetency &
ReadinessModel
Competency &Readiness
Model
Strategy DrivenModel
Strategy DrivenModel
ExecutionDrivenModel
ExecutionDrivenModel
RationalModelRationalModel
Cultural Differences that Do Not Matter
Build Technical Competencies
and Sense Market
Opportunities
Define New Technology
Growth Areas and Commit ResourcesIdentify and Integrate
Growth Platforms in to New Businesses
Aligned with Current Businesses and Other
Structure for Unaligned
8
Discovery Creation, recognition, elaboration, articulation
of opportunities.
IncubationEvolving the
opportunity into a business proposition
AccelerationRamping
up the business to
stand on itsown
Oversee Transitions/Interfaces
•Basic Research•Internal Hunting•External Hunting /License/Purchase /Invest
•Technical•Market Learning•Market Creation•Strategic domains
•Focus•Respond•Invest
Exploration Experimentation Exploitation
DIA Systems Approach
9
Culture and Leadership Challenges
• In every case, Discovery is ‘owned,’ at senior leadership level…– But in most cases, I and A are not, so resource and
organization issues get in the way of success.• More important to remove disincentives than to
give incentives.– Individuals can get burned in this system.
• Incubation is about experimentation and generation of options.– Metrics frequently drive for targeting and financial
results.
10
• Early market participation and early harvesting may violate company culture.
• Aligned opportunities are strategically more comfortable, but tactically more difficult. – GE CEO program the exception.– Bully pulpit????
• Governance/decision making boards sometimes double as coaches….– Conflict of interest.– Different type of talent needed.– Time management troubles.
Culture and Leadership Challenges
11
Processes
Structures
Mandate/Scope
Portfolio Management
Metrics
System Resources
Leadership & Governance
Reward/PunishmentSystems
Skills/TalentDevelopment
Evolution Elements
Sustaining an Innovation Culture