JUDGMENT DATED:-30 October 2015CORAM:-SURESH KAIT .JBRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:-Ms.Shabnam lodgethe complaint against her husband concerningcertain matrimonial and domestic disputes having arisen between the parties. Husband hadalready filed Crl M C No.5311/2014 which was allowed vide order dated 21.11.2014 qua him only.The present petition has been filed by the parents and family members of husband of Ms. Shabnam.The matter has already been settled between the parties and payment of agreed amount has already been made.The marriage between the parties has also been dissolved by Talaqnama executed on 05.11.2014. Now, Ms. Shabnamstates thatno dispute with petitioners survives and so, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question may be brought to an end.Hence,The petition involves quashment of FIR filed forthe offences punishableunder sections 498A/406/34 IPCISSUE INVOLVED:-Whether Non-Compundable Offence can be quashed on the ground of settlement?LAWS INVOLVED:-Section 482, 320 of CrPC.ANALYSIS BY THE COURT:-The Court held thatthe subject matter of this FIR is essentially matrimonial, which now stands mutually and amicably settled between the parties and the complainant is no longer interested in supporting the prosecution because of which, its chances of success in the matter are now greatly diminished. Therefore,this matter deserves to be given a quietus as continuance of proceedings arising out of the FIR in question would be an exercise in futility.Basis of Analysis:-1.Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another (2012) 10 SCC 303 - (Para 58)"Certain offences which overwhelmingly and predominantly bear civil flavour having arisen out of civil, mercantile, commercial, financial, partnership or such like transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony, particularly relating to dowry, etc. orthe family dispute,where the wrong is basically to the victim and the offender and the victim have settled all disputes between them amicably, irrespective of the fact that such offences have not been made compoundable, the High Court may within the framework of its inherent power, quash the criminal proceeding or criminal complaint or FIR if it is satisfied that on the face of such settlement,there is hardly any likelihood of the offender being convicted and by not quashing the criminal proceedings, justice shall be casualty and ends of justice shall be defeated.2.Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2014 6 SCC 466- (Para 29.1 and 29.2)"Power conferred under Section 482 of the Code is to be distinguished from the power which lies in the Court to compound the offences under Section 320 of the Code. No doubt, under Section 482 of the Code, the High Court has inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, where the parties have settled the matter between themselves. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with caution.When the parties have reached the settlement and on that basis petition for quashing the criminal proceedings is filed, the guiding factor in such cases would be to secure: (i)ends of justice, or (ii)to prevent abuse of the process of any court.Those criminal cases having overwhelmingly and predominantly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or arising out of matrimonial relationship or family disputes should be quashed when the parties have resolved their entire disputes among themselves.(29.4)3.Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. Vs. Babita Raghuvanshi & Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58 - (Para -15)"It is the duty of the courts to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes, particularly, when the same are on considerable increase. Even if the offences are non-compoundable, if they relate to matrimonial disputes and the Court is satisfied that the parties have settled the same amicably and without any pressure, we hold that for the purpose of securing ends of justice, Section 320 of the Code would not be a bar to the exercise of power of quashing of FIR, complaint or the subsequent criminal proceedings.