getting to goals: practical approach heart failure management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% ci:...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management
Presented by: Elizabeth Petrovitch, Pharm.D., BCPS
DMC Harper-Hutzel Hospital
![Page 2: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Course Speaker Disclosure Information
Elizabeth Petrovitch, Pharm.D., BCPS
Disclosures
None
2
![Page 3: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
You know the meds and the goals…but how to you get there once you start?
3
![Page 4: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Quick Review: Which medications and when?
Aldosterone Antagonist
Beta Blocker
ACEi/ARB/ ARNI
Vasodilators
Ivabradine
4
![Page 5: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
First & Second: ACEi/ARB and/or Beta Blockers
• For stable patients: Either or both
• If congested: ACEi
• If dry & adequate resting heart rate: beta blocker
• Consider BP, HR, and SCr
CIBIS III Trial Data
Circulation. 2005 Oct 18;112(16):2426-35. 5
![Page 6: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Third: Aldosterone Antagonist
• After ACEi/ARB and Beta blocker on board
• NOT necessary to achieve maximally tolerated doses of other drugs first!
N Engl J Med 2003;348:1309-21.N Engl J Med 1999:341:709-17.
EPHESUS Baseline Characteristics
RALES Baseline Characteristics
6
![Page 7: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Fourth: Additional meds PRN
• Consider these after other agents added, or if contraindication to other agents
Patient factor NYHA Class Additional agent
Persistent volume overload II-IV Diuretic
Persistently symptomatic African Americans III-IV Hydralazine + isosorbide dinitrate
Stable on ACEi/ARB II-III ARNI
Resting HR> 70 on max tolerated beta blocker II-III Ivabradine
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 7
![Page 8: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What about starting with ARNI de novo?
• 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update• Recommendations for
sacubitril/valsartan based on PARADIGM-HF only
• PIONEER-HF• Late 2018
• In hospital initiation of ARNI vs ACEi
N Engl J Med 2019;380:539-48. 8
![Page 9: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Initiating ARNI: Pioneer HF
N Engl J Med 2019;380:539-48. 9
![Page 10: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Audience Response: Getting to Goals
In most cases, how frequently should GDMT meds be titrated in stable patients?
a) Every week
b) Every 2-4 weeks
c) Every 4-6 weeks
d) Every 8 weeks
10
![Page 11: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
KEY concept
Titration should occur even if the patient appears “stable”!
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 11
![Page 12: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Recommended Titration FrequenciesClass Frequency of Titration Monitoring Parameters
(with initiation and each titration)
ACEi/ARB Q2 weeks BP, SCr, K+
Beta blocker Q2 weeks HR, BP, signs of congestion
Aldosterone antagonist Q2 weeks Electrolytes (K+), SCr
Diuretics Days to weeks BP, electrolytes, SCr
Hydralazine + isosorbide dinitrate Q2 weeks BP
ARNI Q2-4 weeks BP, electrolytes, SCr
Ivabradine Q2-4 weeks HR
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 12
![Page 13: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
GDMT Timeline to Target – Can it be done?
+ ACEi
+BB
↑ACEi
↑BB
+AA
↑ACEi
↑BB
↑AA
↑ACEi↑BBAA
ACEi
BB
AA
@ target
0 2 4 6 8Week:
13
![Page 14: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
GDMT Timeline to Target – Can it be done?
+Hydr/ ISDN
↑Hydr/ ISDN
Switch ACEi/
ARB to ARNI (36hr
washout)
↑ ARNI
+ivabr;↑ARNI
↑
ivabra
All @ target!
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26Week:
14
![Page 15: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
What keeps us from this goal?
• Medication side effects/adverse effects
• Medication cost/coverage
• Medication adherence
• Adherence to visit follow up
• Patient health literacy/education
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 15
![Page 16: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Barrier: Worsening renal function
• “Don’t mind the kidneys, treat the heart”• Renal dysfunction may be a > predictor of mortality than LVEF, NYHA Class
• Prescription rates for ACEi/BB in HF inversely related to renal function
• Agents to evaluate with impaired renal function:• ACEi/ARB/ARNI, diuretics, and aldosterone antagonists
• Remember : SCr ↑ 10-15% expected w ACEi due to inhibition of post-glomerular vasoconstriction
16
![Page 17: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Barrier: Worsening renal function
• When to evaluate:• ACEi/ARB/ARNI: Monitor SCr 1-2 weeks after initiation/adjustment • Aldosterone Antagonist: Monitor 2-3 days, then 7 days
• When to be concerned:• >30% decrease in eGFR or hyperkalemia
• Approach to management:• Dose reduction• Evaluate diuretic dose if hypovolemic• Lastly, turn to alternatives if possible
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 17
![Page 18: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• Identify “allergy” clearly
• Change to ARB when possible (i.e. ACEi cough)
• What about angioedema from ACEi?• Incidence:
• ACE-I: 0.1 – 1%• ARB: Unknown, but considered to be significantly lower than ACE-I
Barrier: ACEi Allergy
18
![Page 19: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Barrier: ACEi Allergy
• Risk Factors:• Female
• African American
• Previous history
• Previous drug rash
• Smoking
• Age > 65
• ACE-I induced cough
19
![Page 20: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Barrier: ACEi AllergyTrial Background Results Conclusion
Haymore BR et al
Meta-Analysis- 1 RCT- 2 retrospective cohorts- 71 patients totla
Angioedema while taking an ACE-I switched to an ARB
Risk of Angioedema: 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%)
Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%)
2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an ARB in patients intolerant to ACE-I due to cough or angioedema
On the basis of the CHARM-Alternative study, the meta-analysis conducted by Haymore and colleagues, and the retrospective study conducted by Malde and colleagues, cross-reactivity appears to be <10%
Based on the relatively low prevalence of cross-reactivity in the literature, and the mortality benefits of angiotensin II inhibition in HF, ARBs should be considered in patients with ACE-I-induced angioedema with close monitoring
Malde B et al
Retrospective
61 patients with a diagnosis of angioedema as a result of taking an ACE-I
8% of patients who experienced angioedema from ACE-I’s previously, developed angioedema with an ARB
CHARM-Alternative
Angioedema Subgroup
83 patients w prior ACE-I-induced angioedema or anaphylaxis - 39 patients received candesartan
38 Months of Follow-up:
Angioedema recurred in 3/39 patients (7.7%)
Only 1/39 (2.6%) patients required discontinuation of candesartan
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;101(5):495-9. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007;98(1):57-63.Lancet. 2003;362(9386):772-776 20
![Page 21: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Barrier: ACEi Allergy
• If ARB is NOT acceptable due to risk/tolerance• Consider hydralazine/nitrate
Trial Interventions Patients NYHA/EF Baseline Meds
Primary outcome
Results
V-HeFT I
RandomizedDouble-blindPlacebo-controlled
ISDN/hydralazine 300/160 mg daily
Prazosin 20 mg daily
Placebo
186
183
273
II-IV
<45% (~30%)
Diuretic
Digoxin
Mortality over entire follow-up
Mortality by two years
Lower in ISDN/hydralazine group compared to placebo (difference was borderline significant (P~0.05)
Risk reduction among pts treated with ISDN/hydralazine was 34% (P<0.028)
V-HeFT II
RandomizedDouble-blind
ISDN/hydralazine 300/160 mg daily
Enalapril 20 mg daily
401
403
I-IV
(II, III=~95%)
<45% (~30%)
Diuretic
Digoxin
Mortality by two years
Hospitalization
Morality was significantly lower in the enalapril group than in the ISDN/hydralazine group (18% vs. 25%; P=0.016)
No significant difference between the two groups
N Engl J Med. 1986;314(24):1547-52.N Engl J Med. 1991;325(5): 303-10. 21
![Page 22: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Barrier: Hyperkalemia
• Evaluate underlying reason• Meds
• ACEi/ARB/ARNI
• Aldosterone antagonist
• Changes to diuretic therapy
• Electrolyte replacement
• OTC and supplement use
• Worsening renal function
• Treatment approach• Dose reduction
• Medication withdrawal
• Potassium binding resins
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 22
![Page 23: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Barrier: Hyperkalemia
PEARL-HF
HARMONIZE-HF
European Heart Journal (2011) 32, 820–828.European Journal of Heart Failure (2015) 17, 1050–1056. 23
![Page 24: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Barrier: Symptomatic Hypotension
• Evaluate underlying reason• Other vasoactive meds• Overdiuresis• Autonomic dysfunction• Medication timing
• Treatment approach• Correct above issues if possible• Use best tolerated doses• Consider ACEi/ARB over ARNI• Remember AA targets used in HF are typically below that which may
impact BP
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 24
![Page 25: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Barrier: Cost/Coverage
• Sacubitril/valsartan, ivabradine, patiromer• Prior Authorization often needed• Copay/cost is higher• First line agents are less costly
• Prior Authorization paperwork• Include HF phenotype and NYHA functional class• Use evidence or guideline statements to support request• Address prior therapies• Address contraindications, adverse effects• Document when appropriate that delay or interruption may cause
harm
25
![Page 26: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Barrier: Cost/Coverage
• Manufacturer vouchers• Trial cards – limited time frame and CMS restrictions
• Co-pay cards – CMS restrictions• May need reissued annually
• Samples• Ok for short term or bridging gap while awaiting PA approval
• Not noted in pharmacy systems, could lead to • DDI
• Duplication of therapy
26
![Page 27: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Barrier: Adherence
• Patient education!• Motivational interviewing
• Simplify medication regimens• Combination products
• Once daily formulations
• Consider cost
• Use tools• Pill boxes
• Medication alarms
• Smart phone applications
• Anticipate problems• When to call for refills/problems
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 27
![Page 28: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Barrier: Can’t reach target
• May need to use less than target doses in some patients• Frail
• Elderly
• Medication intolerance
• Focus on having ACEi/ARB/ARNI and BB first and foremost
• Goal: • Beta blocker to target, reduce other agent doses if needed
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230 28
![Page 29: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Other Considerations: Digoxin
• Digoxin is often considered when hypotensive and other medications are contraindicated
• What does the data say?• PROVED and RADIANCE (1993): Taking away digoxin worsens HF• DIG Trial (1997): ↓ HF hospitalizations• Freeman, et al (2013): ↑death, ↔ hospitalization• Madelaire, et al (2016): ↑death, ↑ hospitalization
• Don’t add….but harmful to withdrawal?
JACC. 1993;22(4):955-62 NEJM. 1993;329(1):1-7 NEJM. 1997;336(8):525-533
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:525-533 International Journal of Cardiology. 2016;221:944–950 29
![Page 30: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Audience Response
What is the barrier to reaching goal doses you most often encounter?
a) Medication side effects/adverse effects
b) Patient adherence to medication regimen
c) Medication access/cost
d) Patient follow up
30
![Page 31: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Who will do this titration?
• Team based approach • Heart Failure Specialists
• Nursing
• Pharmacists
• Key elements• Coordination of care
• Monitoring
• Patient education
• “Brown Bag” Clinics –pharmacist managed
JACC 2017;71(2):201-230Curr Probl Cardiol 2019;00:114 31
![Page 32: Getting to Goals: Practical Approach Heart Failure Management · 2019. 11. 7. · 9.4% (95% CI: 1.6-17%) Confirmed Cases: 3.5% (95% CI: 0-9.2%) 2016 ACC/AHA HF update recommend an](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022052102/603cddd7e4d1886797348217/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Conclusions
• Focus on GDMT targets – if the patient can tolerate, titrate!
• Titrate even when HF is stable
• Multiple barriers exsist to reaching target, but some can be overcome
• A team approach involving medication therapy education, titration, and monitoring is key
32