georgia institute of technology sensitivity of future year results to boundary conditions jim...

32
Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Upload: buck-black

Post on 21-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary

Conditions

Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell

February 6, 2001

Page 2: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Overview• July 1995 Episode with 2040 BWC emissions

– Initial and Boundary Conditions reduced by the same ratio that domain-wide emissions were reduced

• NOx reduced 50%• SO2, SO4, and NH4 reduced 63%

• Comparison of Results– Basecase Results vs. 2040 BWC Results (original BCs)– 2040 BWC with Original BCs vs. 2040 BWC with Reduced BCs– Spatial and Station Plots

• Ozone• Sulfate, Nitrate, and Ammonium Aerosols• Sulfate, Nitrate, and Ammonium Wet Deposition

Page 3: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ozone on July 16, 2040 (1:00 PM)

Page 4: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ozone Change on July 16 (1:00 PM)

Page 5: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ozone on July 16, 2040 (9:00 PM)

Page 6: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ozone Change on July 16 (9:00 PM)

Page 7: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ozone at Great Smoky Mountains

Look Rock (TN) - July 1995

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

0.090

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Ozo

ne

(pp

m)

O3_base O3_2040_bwc O3_2040_bwc_scaled_BC

Page 8: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ozone at Shenandoah National Park

Big Meadows (VA) - July 1995

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

0.090

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Ozo

ne

(pp

m)

O3_base O3_2040_bwc O3_2040_bwc_scaled_BC

Page 9: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ozone at Atlanta

South DeKalb (GA) - July 1995

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

0.090

0.100

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Ozo

ne

(pp

m)

O3_base O3_2040_bwc O3_2040_bwc_scaled_BC

Page 10: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Average Sulfate on July 15, 2040

Page 11: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Average Sulfate Change on July 15

Page 12: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Sulfate at Great Smoky Mountains

Great Smoky Mountains (TN) - Average Sulfate (g/m3)(Basecase & BWC)

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

7/11/95 7/12/95 7/13/95 7/14/95 7/15/95 7/16/95 7/17/95 7/18/95 7/19/95

SULF_base SULF_2040 SULF_2040_scaled_BC

Page 13: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Sulfate at Shenandoah National Park

Shenandoah National Park (VA) - Average Sulfate (g/m3)(Basecase & BWC)

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

7/11/95 7/12/95 7/13/95 7/14/95 7/15/95 7/16/95 7/17/95 7/18/95 7/19/95

SULF_base SULF_2040 SULF_2040_scaled_BC

Page 14: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Average Nitrate on July 15, 2040

Page 15: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Average Nitrate Change on July 15

Page 16: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Nitrate at Great Smoky Mountains

Great Smoky Mountains (TN) - Average Nitrate (g/m3)(Basecase & 2040 BWC)

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

7/11/95 7/12/95 7/13/95 7/14/95 7/15/95 7/16/95 7/17/95 7/18/95 7/19/95

NITF_base NITF_2040 NITF_2040_scaled_BC

Page 17: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Nitrate at Shenandoah National Park

Shenandoah National Park (VA) - Average Nitrate (g/m3)(Basecase & 2040 BWC)

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

7/11/95 7/12/95 7/13/95 7/14/95 7/15/95 7/16/95 7/17/95 7/18/95 7/19/95

NITF_base NITF_2040 NITF_2040_scaled_BC

Page 18: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Average Ammonium on July 15, 2040

Page 19: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Average Ammonium Change on July 15

Page 20: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ammonium at Great Smoky Mountains

Great Smoky Mountains (TN) - Average Ammonium (g/m3)(Basecase & 2040 BWC)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

7/11/95 7/12/95 7/13/95 7/14/95 7/15/95 7/16/95 7/17/95 7/18/95 7/19/95

AMNF_base AMNF_2040 AMNF_2040_scaled_BC

Page 21: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Ammonium at Shenandoah National Park

Shenandoah National Park (VA) - Average Ammonium (g/m3)(Basecase & 2040 BWC)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

7/11/95 7/12/95 7/13/95 7/14/95 7/15/95 7/16/95 7/17/95 7/18/95 7/19/95

AMNF_base AMNF_2040 AMNF_2040_scaled_BC

Page 22: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Sulfate Deposition (2040)

Page 23: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Sulfate Deposition Change

Page 24: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Sulfate Deposition Change

Weekly Sulfate Wet Deposition(Basecase & 2040 BWC)

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Great Smoky Mountains Shenandoah National Park

Su

lfate

Flu

x (m

g/m

2)

SO4_base SO4_2040 SO4_2040_scaled_BC

Page 25: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Nitrate Deposition (2040)

Page 26: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Nitrate Deposition Change

Page 27: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Nitrate Deposition Change

Weekly Nitrate Wet Deposition(Basecase & 2040 BWC)

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Great Smoky Mountains Shenandoah National Park

Nitr

ate

Flu

x (m

g/m

2)

SO4_base SO4_2040 SO4_2040_scaled_BC

Page 28: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Ammonium Deposition (2040)

Page 29: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Ammonium Deposition Change

Page 30: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Weekly Ammonium Deposition Change

Weekly Ammonium Wet Deposition(Basecase & 2040 BWC)

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

Great Smoky Mountains Shenandoah National Park

NH

4 F

lux

(mg

/m2)

SO4_base SO4_2040 SO4_2040_scaled_BC

Page 31: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Summary of Reducing BCs

• Ozone– decrease 5 -8 ppb off daily maximum– additional 20 - 25% reduction from basecase

• Aerosols– Sulfate

• decrease 2 -3 g/m3 off daily average• additional 10 -15% reduction from basecase

– Nitrate• changed by less than 0.5 g/m3 (+ or -)

– Ammonium• decrease 0.5 - 1.0 g/m3 off daily average• additional 20 - 30% reduction from basecase

Page 32: Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001

Georgia Institute of Technology

Summary of Reducing BCs

• Wet Deposition– Sulfate

• additional 15% reduction from basecase

– Nitrate• little change

– Ammonium• additional 5 - 10% reduction from basecase