Geometric Design Elements

Download Geometric Design Elements

Post on 21-Dec-2015




0 download

Embed Size (px)


Geometric Design Elements


<ul><li><p> 5C-2 </p><p>Design Manual </p><p>Chapter 5 - Roadway Design </p><p>5C - General Design Criteria </p><p> 1 Revised: 2013 Edition </p><p>Geometric Design Elements </p><p>A. Level of Service </p><p>Level of service (LOS) is a measure of the operating conditions of a roadway facility. LOS is based </p><p>upon traffic performance related to speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and </p><p>comfort and convenience. The LOS ranges from A (least congested) to F (most congested). Refer to </p><p>the Highway Capacity Manual for a more thorough discussion of the LOS concept. </p><p>Based upon the traffic capacity analysis, the number of lanes, turn lanes, and intersection controls </p><p>should be selected to provide a design with the desired LOS for the design year traffic. Design year </p><p>traffic is based upon a 20 year traffic projection. The current Highway Capacity Manual and the </p><p>current AASHTO Green Book should be used for traffic projections and to determine the number of lanes and intersection configuration at the desired LOS. </p><p>The LOS for the roadway overall is based upon Average Daily Traffic (ADT), while the LOS at </p><p>signalized intersections is based upon the peak hourly volume (PHV). </p><p>As a planning tool, the following tables are provided to indicate approximate capacities for two lane </p><p>and four lane streets and highways and intersection capacity for four way stop and signalized </p><p>intersections. These tables do not consider site specific details and should not be utilized for final </p><p>design purposes. </p><p>Table 5C-2.01: Maximum ADT vs. LOS and Type of Terrain for Two Lane Highways </p><p>Terrain LOS </p><p>B C D </p><p>Level 3,200 - 4,800 5,300 - 7,900 9,000 - 13,500 </p><p>Rolling 1,800 - 2,800 3,500 - 5,200 5,300 - 8,000 </p><p>Hilly 900 - 1,300 1,600 - 2,400 2,500 - 3,700 </p><p>Table 5C-2.02: Reduced Capacity of Narrow Lanes with Restricted Lateral Clearance </p><p>Usable Shoulder Width or </p><p>Clearance to Obstruction (feet) </p><p>Two Lane Roadway </p><p>(percent of capacity of 12 feet lane) </p><p>12 feet lanes 11 feet lanes 10 feet lanes </p><p>6 100 93 84 </p><p>4 92 85 77 </p><p>2 81 75 68 </p><p>0 70 65 58 </p></li><li><p>Chapter 5 - Roadway Design Section 5C-2 - Geometric Design Elements </p><p> 2 Revised: 2013 Edition </p><p>Table 5C-2.03: Planning Capacity at LOS C1, D, and E2 </p><p>Two Way Arterial Streets (Non-intersection) </p><p>Number </p><p>of Lanes Turn Lanes </p><p>Capacity, VPD at LOS D </p><p>Minimal </p><p>Side Friction </p><p>Light </p><p>(Residential) </p><p>Side Friction </p><p>Moderate </p><p>(Mixed Zoning) </p><p>Side Friction </p><p>Heavy </p><p>Side Friction </p><p>Two Lanes </p><p>Undivided </p><p>Without turn lanes 12,100 11,600 11,200 10,400 </p><p>With turn lanes 16,000 15,300 14,000 13,900 </p><p>Four Lanes </p><p>Undivided </p><p>Without turn lanes 24,300 23,400 23,400 21,900 </p><p>With left turn lanes or </p><p>5 lane with center TWLTL 32,100 30,900 30,900 29,100 </p><p>Four Lanes </p><p>Divided </p><p>Without turn lanes 27,100 26,200 26,100 23,300 </p><p>With left turn lanes 35,400 34,200 34,100 32,500 </p><p>With left and right turn lanes 37,500 36,200 34,400 34,400 </p><p> LOS - Level of Service </p><p> TWLTL - Two-Way Left-Turn Lane </p><p> VPD - Vehicles per Day 1 Capacity at LOS C may be determined by multiplying LOS D values above by 0.8. 2 Capacity at LOS E may be determined by multiplying LOS D values above by 1.2. </p><p>Source: Adapted from 2000 Des Moines Area Daily Directional Capacities At Level of Service D - Des Moines Area MPO </p><p>Table 5C-2.04: Approximate LOS C Service Volumes (VPH) for </p><p>Four Way Stop-controlled Intersections (Sum of all Four Legs) </p><p>Demand Split Two Lanes on </p><p>Each Street </p><p>Street 1: Two Lanes </p><p>Street 2: Four Lanes </p><p>Four Lanes on </p><p>Each Street </p><p>50/50 1,200 1,800 2,200 </p><p>55/45 1,140 1,720 2,070 </p><p>60/40 1,080 1,660 1,970 </p><p>65/35 1,010 1,630 1,880 </p><p>70/30 960 1,610 1,820 </p><p>B. Sight Distance </p><p>The following information is taken from the 2004 AASHTO Green Book. The Project Engineer should check the current edition of the AASHTO Green Book when specific information is needed to verify values provided. </p><p>1. Stopping Sight Distances: The minimum stopping sight distance is the distance required by the </p><p>driver of a vehicle traveling at the design speed to bring the vehicle to a stop after an object on the </p><p>road becomes visible. This distance directly affects the length and rate of curvature for vertical </p><p>curves. </p><p>The method for measuring stopping sight distance on vertical curves assumes a height for the </p><p>drivers eye and a height for an object in the road. For a crest vertical curve, the sight distance is the distance at which an object in the road appears to the driver over the crest of the curve. </p></li><li><p>Chapter 5 - Roadway Design Section 5C-2 - Geometric Design Elements </p><p> 3 Revised: 2013 Edition </p><p>Figure 5C-2.01: Vertical Sight Distance Determination </p><p>Stopping sight distance is calculated based upon an assumed height of the drivers eye and an assumed height of an object in the roadway. For all sight distance criteria, the height of the </p><p>drivers eye is assumed to be 3.5 feet above the surface of the road, as recommended by AASHTO. Tables 5C-1.01 and 5C-1.02 in Section 5C-1 assume two different values for the </p><p>height of the object in the roadway. The Acceptable values in Table 5C-1.02 use a 2 foot object height according to the current edition of the AASHTO Green Book. The Preferred values in Table 5C-1.01 assume an object height of only 6 inches. This lower object height was </p><p>the design value used in previous versions of the AASHTO Green Book. The results of assuming a smaller object height for the preferred values in Table 5C-1.01 are higher required K </p><p>values and longer vertical curves. </p><p>2. Sight Distance on Horizontal Curves: The horizontal alignment must provide at least the </p><p>minimum stopping distance for the design speed at all points. This includes visibility around </p><p>curves and roadside encroachments. </p><p>Where there are sight obstructions such as walls, cut slopes, buildings, fences, bridge structures, </p><p>or other longitudinal barriers on the inside of curves, an adjustment in the minimum radius of the </p><p>curve may be necessary. In no case should sight distance be less than the stopping sight distance </p><p>specified in Tables 5C-1.01 and 5C-1.02 in Section 5C-1. The sight distance design procedure </p><p>should assume a 6 foot fence (as measured from finished grade) exists along all property lines </p><p>except in the sight distance triangles required at all intersections. </p><p>Available sight distance around a horizontal curve can be determined graphically using the </p><p>method shown in Figures 5C-2.02 and 5C-2.03 below. From the center of the inside lane (Point </p><p>A), a line is projected through the point on the obstruction that is nearest to the curve (Point B). </p><p>The line is then extended until it intersects the centerline of the inside lane (Point C). </p></li><li><p>Chapter 5 - Roadway Design Section 5C-2 - Geometric Design Elements </p><p> 4 Revised: 2013 Edition </p><p>Figure 5C-2.02 and Figure 5C-2.03: Sight Distances for Horizontal Curves </p><p>Source: Adapted from AASHTO Green Book, 2004 Edition, Exhibits 3-53 and 3-54 </p></li><li><p>Chapter 5 - Roadway Design Section 5C-2 - Geometric Design Elements </p><p> 5 Revised: 2013 Edition </p><p>3. Passing Sight Distance: Passing sight distance is the minimum sight distance that must be </p><p>available to enable the driver of one vehicle to pass another safely and comfortably without </p><p>interfering with oncoming traffic traveling at the design speed. Two lane roads should provide </p><p>adequate passing zones at regular intervals. Minimum passing sight distances are shown in </p><p>Tables 5C-1.01 and 5C-1.02 in Section 5C-1. </p><p>Passing sight distance is measured between an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object height of 3.5 </p><p>feet. On straight sections of roadway, passing sight distance is determined primarily by the </p><p>vertical curvature of the roadway. On horizontal curves, obstructions adjacent to the roadway on </p><p>the inside of the curve can limit sight distance. This is most common in a cut section where the </p><p>adjacent terrain projects above the surface of the roadway. Passing sight distance should be </p><p>verified using the methods described in the current edition of the AASHTO Green Book. </p><p>4. Intersection Sight Distance: In addition to the stopping sight distance provided continuously in </p><p>the direction of travel on all roadways, adequate sight distance at intersections must be provided </p><p>to allow drivers to perceive the presence of potentially conflicting vehicles. Sight distance is also </p><p>required at intersections to allow drivers of stopped vehicles to decide when to enter or cross the </p><p>intersecting roadway. If the available sight distance for an entering or crossing vehicle is at least </p><p>equal to the appropriate stopping sight distance for the major road, then drivers have sufficient </p><p>sight distance to anticipate and avoid collisions. However, in some cases, this may require a </p><p>major road vehicle to slow or stop to accommodate the maneuver by a minor road vehicle. To </p><p>enhance traffic operations, intersection sight distances that exceed stopping sight distances are </p><p>desirable along the major road. </p><p>Each intersection has the potential for several different types of vehicular conflicts. The </p><p>possibility of these conflicts actually occurring can be greatly reduced by providing proper sight </p><p>distance and appropriate traffic controls. Each quadrant of an intersection should contain a </p><p>triangular area free of obstructions that might block an approaching drivers view of potentially conflicting vehicles. This clear area is known as the sight triangle. </p><p>a. Sight Triangles: Proper sight distance at intersections is determined through the </p><p>establishment and enforcement of sight triangles. The required dimensions of the legs of the </p><p>triangle depend on the design speed of the roadways and the type of traffic control provided </p><p>at the intersection. Two types of clear sight triangles are considered in intersection design: </p><p>approach sight triangles and departure sight triangles. </p><p>1) Approach Sight Triangles: Approach sight triangles allow the drivers at uncontrolled or yield controlled intersections to see a potentially conflicting vehicle in sufficient time </p><p>to slow or stop before colliding within the intersection. Although desirable at all </p><p>intersections, approach sight triangles are not needed for intersections approaches </p><p>controlled by stop signs or traffic signals. </p><p>2) Departure Sight Triangles: A second type of clear sight triangle provides sight distance sufficient for a stopped driver on a minor-road approach to depart from the intersection </p><p>and enter or cross the major road. Departure sight triangles should be provided in each </p><p>quadrant of each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign. </p><p>At signalized intersections, the first vehicle stopped on one approach should be visible to the </p><p>driver of the first vehicle stopped on each of the other approaches. Left turning vehicles </p><p>should have sufficient sight distance to select gaps in oncoming traffic. </p><p>The recommended dimensions of the sight triangles vary with the type of traffic control used </p><p>at an intersection because different types of controls impose different legal constraints on </p><p>drivers and, therefore, result in different driver behavior. The AASHTO Green Book </p></li><li><p>Chapter 5 - Roadway Design Section 5C-2 - Geometric Design Elements </p><p> 6 Revised: 2013 Edition </p><p>contains the required procedures, equations, and tables for determining the required sight </p><p>distance under various intersection and traffic control configurations. </p><p>b. Identification of Sight Obstructions within Sight Triangles: Within a sight triangle, any </p><p>object at a height above the elevation of the adjacent roadways that would obstruct the </p><p>drivers view should be removed or lowered if practical. Such objects may include buildings, parked vehicles, highway structures, roadside hardware, hedges, trees, bushes, unmowed </p><p>grass, tall crops, walls, fences, and the terrain itself. Particular attention should be given to </p><p>the evaluation of clear sight triangles at intersection ramp/crossroad intersections where </p><p>features such as bridge railings, piers, and abutments are potential sight obstructions. </p><p>The determination of whether an object constitutes a sight obstruction should consider both </p><p>the horizontal and vertical alignment of both intersecting roadways, as well as the height and </p><p>position of the object. In making this determination, it should be assumed that the drivers eye is 3.5 feet above the roadway surface and that the approaching vehicle to be seen is 3.5 </p><p>feet above the surface of the intersecting road. </p><p>C. Horizontal Alignment </p><p>1. Roadway Curvature and Superelevation: On urban streets where operating speed is relatively </p><p>low and variable, the use of superelevation for horizontal curves can be minimized. Although </p><p>superelevation is advantageous for traffic operation, in urban areas the combination of wide </p><p>pavements, the need to meet the grade of adjacent properties, the desire to maintain low speed </p><p>operation, the need to maintain pavement profiles for drainage, and the frequency of cross streets </p><p>and driveways and other urban features often combine to make the use of superelevation </p><p>impractical or undesirable. Generally, the absence of superelevation on low speed urban streets is </p><p>not detrimental to the motorist and superelevation is not typically provided on urban streets with a </p><p>design speed of 45 mph or less. </p><p>The preferred radii shown in Section 5C-1, Table 5C-1.01 assume that a normal crown is </p><p>maintained around a horizontal curve. With a standard 2% pavement cross-slope, this effectively </p><p>results in a negative 2% superelevation for the outside lane. For roadways with a cross-slope </p><p>other than 2%, including four lane and wider sections that utilize a steeper cross-slope for the </p><p>outside lanes, the required curve radius should be determined from the guidance provided in the </p><p>current AASHTO Green Book or from Figure 5C-2.04 below. </p><p>While superelevation on low speed urban roadways is not desirable, it may be necessary in </p><p>situations where site conditions require a horizontal curve that cannot sustain traffic with the </p><p>negative superelevation that results from maintaining the normal crown. For these situations, </p><p>superelevation equal to the normal cross-slope may be provided for the outside lane. Section 5C-</p><p>1, Table 5C-1.02 assumes the adverse crown in the outside lane of a curve is removed. For a </p><p>roadway with a normal 2% cross-slope, this results in a superelevation of 2% across the width of </p><p>the pavement. For roadways with cross-slopes other than 2%, the required radius and the </p><p>resulting superelevation should be determined from the guidance provided in current AASHTO </p><p>Green Book or from Figure 5C-2.04 below. The maximum superelevation for low speed urban roadways should not exceed the normal cross-slope or a maximum of 3%. </p><p>For roadways with design speeds of 50 mph or greater, superelevation of the roadway is </p><p>acceptable and expected by motorists. The radii provided in Section 5C-1, Tables 5C-1.01 and </p><p>5C-1.02 are based upon superelevation rates of 4% and 6% respectively. The maximum </p><p>superelevation rate in urban areas should not exceed 6%. </p></li><li><p>Chapter 5 -...</p></li></ul>