geology and structure of the rock lake granite ........... l m l •••illllllll 41ie7se0ee2...

- . .......... l m l •••Illllllll41ie7SE0ee2 2.14643 CHERRIMAN

010

GEOLOGY and STRUCTURE

of

THE ROCK LAKE GRANITE

- CHERRIMAN TOWNSHIP -

Prepared by:

Robert G. Komtrechkt P.Geol. January 30, 1992

for:

Robert G. Komarechka

CHERR i MAN "" ~" 010n

TABLE OF CONTENTS

page

INTRODUCTIOH.......................................................................................3

LOCATION and ACCESS.......................,,.....,........,.......,..............,^

PREVIOUS EXPLORATION WORK.............................,................,,.*

DESCRIPTION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES............................................-!LINE CUTTING.........................................................................^MAPPING.................................................................................^

PHYSIOGRAPHY.....................................................................................^

OVERBURDEN.........................................................................^VEGETATION..........................................................................^

GENERAL GEOLOGY..............................................................................?

LITHOLOGY......................................^BIOTITE AMPHIBOLE GNEISS...............................................?PORPHYRITIC AMPHIBOLE MONZONITE.............................8BIOTITE QUARTZ MONZONITE GNEISS................................9BIOTITE MONZONITE GNBISS.............................................9OLIVINE GABBR0..................................................................9MISCELLANEOUS ROOCS......................................................10

.................................................................................................10FRACTURES, GNEISSIC STREAKY LINEATIONS, PEGMATITIC DIKELETS and QUARTZ VEINS.................... l OMAFIC DIKES fc MAFIC BODIES......................................... 11INCLUSIONS..........................................................................11SHEBTING..............................................................................12

EVALUATION of SOUNDNESS.........................................................12

ECONOMIC POTENTIAL.....................................................................^

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,, 13

CERTIFICATE,.,,,.,,,,,.,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,, 16

APPENDICES.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,17 APPENDIX l - FIELD NOTES,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 18

List of MapsMap * l - Indei Map,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,J-i Map * 2 - O.G.S. Geological Local In d e i Map,,,,,,3-ii Map * 3 - Cherriman Twp Claims Map.,,,,,,,,,,,3-iii Map * 4 - Geology Map,.,.,.,,.,.,,,,,,..,,in back pocket

GEOLOGY and STRUCTURE

of


- TOWNSHIP OF CHERRIMAN -

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to map a large relatively structurally competent monzonite pluton to determine its suitability for the production of large sound blocks to be used for dimension stone purposes. This mapping involved noting: differences in mineral composition, variations in texture and their variety, orientation and spacing of fractures, sheeting, pegmatite veinlets. quartz veins, diabase dikes and inclusions.

Acknowledgement is given to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines and their Ontario Prospector's Assistance Program ( OPAP i for the funding of this work.

LOCATION fc ACCESS

The study area is located in the northwest corner of Cherriman township in the District of Sudbury. It is located at a latitude of 46* 16 and longitude of 80' 34'. The property consists of ten unpatented claims numbered: S 117688, S 1117689. S 1117690. S 1117691, S 1117692, S 1117693. S 1117694. S 1117695. S 1117696 and S 1117697. This area is also covered by an application for a quarry permit which extends further to the north.

Access to the area can be obtained by driving 30 kilometers south of Sudbury on Highway 69. just south of Estaire, then turning left on to the gravel Trout Lake road and driving 25 kilometers just past Judge Lake. The proposed area is located about 2 kilometers along a gravel road to the north

t - IKIDE.K MAP

— 00"

KitkU* UKe

WivJ

46*

CHANHCt

lliot LaVeE5PWJOL*

fto*

NORTH BNV

of the Trout Lake road. This road forks to the right and leads to a gravel pit. Logging activities in the area has created a network of roads which are still passable by two wheel drive later in the summer.

Alternative access can also be obtained via Highway "535 by turning about 11 kilometers north of Noelville and travelling 12.4 kilometers westward on the Trout Lake road to reach the gravel pit road mentioned earlier.

Map *1, *2 and *3 gives the general location of this site.

PREVIOUS EXPLORATION WORK

Previous unrecorded work in this area consisted of the following:

l J Examination of some late ultramafic post grenville intrusions near the south shore of Barlow Lake for their PGE potential by Bob Semeniuk, prospector. Some minor nickel was noted in assays - pers. communication.

2 1 Examination of late post grenville olivine gabbroic intrusives south of Sixbass Lake for their PGE potential and for their potential use for curling stone, This work was done by the author. No anomalous PGEs were encountered and the potential curling stone rock proved to be only fractured narrow dikes,

31 Preliminary prospecting and ASTM testing of the Rock Lake Pluton for its dimension stone potential (from unreleased 1990 OPAP report by the author).

DESCRIPTION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

LINECUTTING

Linecutting was performed by Joe Kowal of 22 Downing Street, Sudbury, during the periods from May 13 to 16. 1991 inclusive and July 8 to 13, 1991 inclusive. A 90' baseline extending from claim post "l of SI 117697 to claim post *2 of S 1117690 was picketed at 25 meter intervals using topofil. Each picket was labelled and flagged. A compass bearing (the

declination being set at 7.5') was taken with a silva ranger compass. Foresiting and backsiting maintained a straight baseline while compass bearings were used to confirm the bearing.

Lines east and west, at right angles from the baseline to the periphery of the claim group, were blazed, topofilled, flagged and labeled at 25 meter intervals.

MAPPING

Mapping was undertaken from July 9 to 15 inclusive, by the author. Robert G. Komarechka of Apt.** l, 537 Haig St. Sudbury, Ontario, along the 100 meter lines at right angles to the baseline and along the perimeter of the claim group. Previous mapping of the baseline had been done from May 16 to 17 1991 inclusive, while inspecting the cutting of the baseline.

Mapping of all structural features was not possible on a program such as this, however representative readings from all prominent features were attempted. Even in areas of sound rock, lichen was peeled back and even orientation of hairline fractures were accounted. As a result the number of readings taken at a particular outcrop may not be indicative of the soundness of the stone and as a result a rating of soundness was assigned to most outcrops.

Information from field mapping was collected in a field book. These notes have been photocopied and are contained in appendii #1. Information was then transferred to Map *4 in the back pocket. Unfortunately all the structural information would not show clearly on one map and time constraints did not permit the production of a separate structural map. For information such as joint spacing and thickness of dikes and fracture zones review the field notes in appendix * l.

PHYSIOGRAPHY

TOPOGRAPHY

The topography of the study area is generally high and flat with a mild depression in the east central area which drains to the south. The perimeter of the area is surrounded by lakes to the south, east and west.

The elevation drops abruptly as cliffs or steep hills 30 -20 meters in height near these lakes. To the north the elevation drops slightly into a swamp

OVERBURDEN

Outcrop exposure was generally quite good throughout the study area with overburden cover generally only inches to a few feet thick at most. The exceptions being the southeast portion of the claim group and some areas to the east of the north - south access road. Overburden depths were generally onlv a few feet in these areas at most, however, in the southeast area of the claim group thick overburden with lush large tree growth was noted along with some gravel. Some areas in the east central portions of the claim group were also covered by shallow swampy areas. These areas tended to dry up later during the summer. Overburden in these areas are generally only a few inches to occasionally more than a foot thick.

Old logging roads, now trails, still provide good access throughout the study area, especially in the north. The majority of these roads have been constructed directlv on the level surface of the rock in this area.

VEGETATION

Vegetation in the study area consists of stunted mixed second growth bush of birch, spruce and alders. An attempt to establish a red pine plantation in the area was unsuccessful and only minor patches of these trees were found growing in areas of thicker soil cover. Mature stands of sugar maple and white pine were observed along the unlogged lake shorelines and within an area of lush growth in the southeast portion of the claim group. I had been informed by the MNR that his area had been selectively logged.

Along line 900E near the lakeshore of Rock Lake in the biotite feldspathic gneiss there exists a narrow recessively weathered soil covered band concordant with the gneissosity that carried unusual vegetation for this area Within this 4-15 band were found poison ivy, tiger lilies and wild peas. As this type of vegetation is more typical of high calcium, high pH soil, it is suspected that a thin band of calcsilicate rocks or carbonate veins may underlie this area.

GENERAL GEOLOGY

Regionally, the study area is located within the northwestern region of the central gneiss belt of the Grenville Province and structurally within the Ottawa Bonnechere Graben. The surrounding rocks of the area consist, for the most part, of biotite feldspathic paragneiss having a north-northwest sinking gneissosity dipping toward the east. The study area is one of several monzonitic plutons found in the area, the largest being the Cosby batholith to the south.

The area of study is an area of approximately 144 hectares, of massive to slightly foliated pink porphyritic amphibole biotite monzonite rock located to the north of Sixbass Lake. This rock is generally competent with widely spaced jointing allowing for the production of large blocks m some areas. Examination of this rock indicates a relative homogeneous composition and texture throughput its extent. Gneissosity occurs along the perimeter of this intrusive near its contact with the surrounding feldspathic and biotitic paragneiss, More massive material is found toward the interior

LITHOLOGY

BIOTITE AMPHIBOLE GNEISS

Biotite amphibole gneiss represents the host rock of the Rock Lake Pluton This rock unit i? actually a heterogeneous unit consisting of alternating bands of biotite and feldspathic migmatic gneiss. A narrow possible calcsilicate band may also exist along the east shore of Rock Lake

The contact of the biotite amphibole gneiss unit with the Rock Lake Pluton occurs very abruptly along the east shoreline of Rock Lake. This contact is generally obscured by overburden while the adjacent pluton forms a high ridges or cliffs to the east.

Long narrow islands and peninsulas found in Rock Lake are frequently formed from the more competent feldspathic bands. On the west shore of Rock Lake an agmatitic gneiss composed of irregular non foliated amphibolite clasts were noted. It is quite possible that the eastern contact of the Rock Lake Pluton along Rock Lake may be along a NNW trending fault paralleling others in the area.

The gneissosity of this rock unit in the study area is generally 173 and dips varying from 40'-70' to the east, This corresponds to the gneissosity of the pluton in the immediate vicinity of the contact however within 100 meters eastward into the intrusive the gneissosity changes to a 145 ! strike

Along the contact of the pluton with the biotite amphibole gneiss rafting of metasedimetary slabs were observed as inclusions within the monzonite. These inclusions are discussed later under defects. In addition to this incorporation of material, there also appears to be a zonation of the monzonite towards a more quartz rich granitic composition along the contact, possibly due to assimilation of the surrounding paragneiss or metasediments,

In the northeast part of the study area numerous metasedimentary inclusions suggest proximity to a metasedimentary contact or perhaps an eroded roof pendant.

PORPHYRITIC AMPHIBOLE MONZONITB

This rock unit is the preferred dimension stone material investigated in this study. It generally consists of about 35* Kspar i occurring primarily as smaller interstitial crystals). 35% plagioclase (frequently as pinkish grev phenocrysts varying from 0,3 to l cm.) and about 25X mafic minerals, About 5* quartz makes up the remainder of the rock. The mafic constituents of this rock occur as black irregular wispy clots about 0.3 to O 6 cm across. These clots appear to be somewhat zoned with an outer zone of small randomly oriented tiny biotite crystals followed with an inner zone of amphiboles and frequently an interior of pinhead sized magnetite. The zonation of these mafic clots is variable, with some varieties having no biotite to varieties grading into a biotite monzonite gneiss with no amphiboles or magnetite.

The pink to red colouration of this syenite is due in large part to hematite from the mafic clots collecting in microfractures and along intercrvstalline boundaries of the feldspars. Darker red varieties of this rock have been found in close proximity to an amphibole gneiss at the east end of L1100E.

Generally this rock unit is massive with a slight gneissosity that becomes more predominant as the biotite content increases. It is felt that the more amphibolite massively textured varieties of this stone represent the deeper interior of the pluton

BTQTTTE QUARTS MONZONITIC GNEISS

Biotite quartz monzonitic i to granitic gneiss) occur in the map area in several areas. Interestingly, it appears that as the biotite content increases m the monzonite the amphibole content becomes reduced, the gneissosity becomes more prominent and the quartz content increases. This trend was observed as the western contact of the pluton was approached as well as in the northeast and east central areas (near CP *2 of claim S 1117693). Frequently associated with these rocks were numerous biotite rich inclusions.

BIOTITE MONZONITE GNEISS

Between the porphyritic amphibole monzonite and the biotite quartz monzonite gneiss we find a biotite monzonite gneiss. Often the gradation between the porphyritic amphibole monzonite and the biotite monzonite is almost imperceptible and the collective term porphyritic amphibole biotite monzonite has been used to describe these transition rocks. These rocks also display a faint to prominent gneissosity. In some areas these rocks can be quite sound and may suitable for quarrying

OLIVINE GABBRO

Post Grenville olivine gabbro has been observed in several areas around the Rock Lake Pluton. The occurrences of this rock all appear to be of an irregular dike-like nature and appear to occur most frequently around the south and east perimeter of the pluton. They generally have an east - west strike with a near vertical dip.

These rocks have fresh unmetamorphosed texture and contain significant magnetite which gives them a strong magnetic signature. A unique feature of these rocks is the unusual toughness of their plagioclase. The plagioclase of these gabbros contain minute opaque inclusions i possibly spinel or carbon - OGS lab analvsis of thin section) which gives the plagioclase a mauve gray colour and causes the plagioclase to break with a conchoidal fracture.

MISCELLANEOUS

Other minor rocks observed in the area include pegmatites and a dikelike amphibolite biotite rock referred to as a mafic dike or as amphibolite gneiss. The origins of this mafic rock are uncertain These rocks are further discussed under defects.

DEFECTS

This general encompassing term is used to group both structural and non homogeneous textured features related to variations in a solid massive competent granitic body. It includes fractures, streaky gneissic lineaments, pegmatitic dikelets, quartz veins, mafic dikes, inclusions and sheeting.

FRACTURES. GNEISSIC STREAKY L1NEATIONS. PEGMATITIC DIKLETS and QUARTZ VEINS

Fractures were found throughout lineations the Rock Lake Pluton with variable orientation and spacing. Two major type? of fracture? were noted. The first variety consists of fracture zones of several parallel striking vertically dipping fractures while the second variety consists of almost imperceptible hairline fractures. Fractures of the first type are shown on map ^ as two parallel fractures symbols. An example of these fractures can be seen from line 3+89 at 0+30 meters East, striking at 14V. to just north of line 7-85 at 2-60 meters East. This orientation was also paralleled by streaky gneissic lineaments having widths from 1/16" to about l wide. In the same area a second set of fractures strike at 167'. This second set of Iractures are generally hairline but can develop into thin pegmatitic dikelets.

Other areas have somewhat different fractures orientation, probably m part, affected by various in the orientation of the pre-existing gneissosity, conductive heat flow and external tectonic forces.

The prominence of fractures between these two sets varies in different areas. Generally the first set tend to form longer more pervasive Iractures that can i at about 100m intervals i form fractured and streaky zones up to several feet wide. The second set generally have a tighter spacing and tend to be hairline varieties which can develop into pegmatitic

dikelets up to 3". The centre of these pegmatitic dikelets can contain a l l i - \ wide quartz interiors.

It is possible that the first set of fractures relate to tectonic movements m the later stages of cooling while still somewhat plastic and the second set relate to a release of tensional stresses after solidification with the emplacement of volatiles forming pegmatitic dikelets in the larger open fractures.

In the northeast vicinity of the study area, erratic nonlinear gneissic patterns occur similar to that observed in the narrow linear trends observed elsewhere. Inclusions were also common in this area.

MAFIC DYKES fc MAFIC BODIES

Several large areas of mafic rock predominantly of biotite and amphibolite are found within the pluton. One of these areas occurs along the north shoreline of Sixbass Lake at line 11*53 while another occurs along the east side of the north-south access road between lines 10*00 and 11*00. In some of these areas these bodies appear to have dike like configuration with sharp parallel contacts while in others they appear as large irregular masses with assimilation of their margins with the granitic magma. It is postulated that these may be remnants of roof pendants of enclosing mafic bands of the earlier migmatized host rock..

INCLUSIONS

Inclusions of biotite amphibole clasts were observed in several areas as shown on map 5 and discussed earlier. These inclusions vary in size from almost imperceptible, fuzzy edged 1/4 X 1/2' clots to pieces several feet in size. Several areas of the mapped area are rendered useless due to their erratic presence and abundance despite the soundness of the rock in these areas. Examples of this can be found m some areas in the northeast portion of the study area.

Generally these inclusions are ellipsoidal in shape becoming more elongated along the gneissosity in the more gneissic zones. Occasionally a lineation of orientation is observed for groups of these inclusions, possibly due a stretched out boudinage fabric.

In the massive rock inclusions are less common and more smaller.

11

SHEETING

Subhorizontal sheeting paralleling the surface topography was observed on monzonitic cliffs on the east side of Rock Lake. This sheeting generally varied from l meter to 3 meters in height. As mapping progressed over the study area numerous ledges 2 - 6 high were encountered between relatively flat areas on either side. Along these ledges were numerous blocks having flat bottoms. Sometimes, tapping the adjacent bedrock ledge with a sledge gave a hollow sound of constant tone probably indicating an open underlying parallel crack.

Some of the edges of these sheets were mapped later in the mapping once it became apparent what they represented.

It is believe this sheeting is the result of the release of residual tensional stresses caused by the removal of the glacial ice sheet. The perseverance of this sheeting through the various lithologies of the Rock Lake Pluton support this view

It is felt in this area that the use of these subhorizontal fractures between sheets can allow lor a more economic extraction of blocks a? horizontal drilling could be minimized.

EVALUATION OP SOUNDNESS

Most outcrops, where observations allowed, were given a rating as to their soundness. These observations were based on spacings between t ractures and other lineations to estimate the maximum size block capable of being extracted. This was tedious work and involved removing moss and lichen and frequently viewing with the hand lens for hairline cracks. In the event of unremovable overburden covering the outcrop, estimates for soundness were occasionally given as indicated by the preceding word apparently (eg. apparently sound). Soundness at depth was qualitatively assessed if no hollow sound was heard on hammering the rock.

12

The outcrops were rated accordingly:

VERY SOUND areas of at least 8* i 8* lacking fractures or otherlineaments

SOUND areas of at least 4' z 8' lacking fractures orother lineaments

MOD SOUND areas of at least 4* i 6' lacking fractures or otherlineaments

BLOCKY areas of at least 4' i 2* lacking fractures or otherlineaments

POOR areas of less than 4* z 2* lacking fractures orother lineaments. Fractured and unsuitable for quarrying

Soundness evaluation was independent of textural variation or the presence of inclusions.

ECONOMIC POTENTIAL

An evaluation of a part of this property by independent consultants 1 Martinsen k Wingen) has indicated good potential for the production of large blocks. It was stated that under current market conditions rough undressed stone of this varietv could sell for 1800.00 /m3

CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of this mapping, several areas of generally sound massive granitic rock have been located which would justify the further expense of developing a quarry face and removing several sound blocks for testing and market promotion. Three locations are shown on map 5 but are

more clearly on Map 6

Of these areas, location A appears to offer the greatest potential. It isthe largest area covering about 275,000 m 2 and is located in the most massive of the monzonite. It is also located at the highest elevation which will ensure a dry quarry with minimal dewatering problems. In addition to this area, unproven potential may exist in adjacent overburden covered area? to the west and southeast.

13

Several proposed initial quarry face development sites have been selected in each of the above areas, The preferred site for location A would be site *1. A natural solid ledge (at least 4 foot high) at this location offer? a good access to sound material.

It should be mentioned that the above evaluation was made over many areas with limited outcrop exposure and at a rather large scale. Before production is contemplated it is highly recommended that an ongoing overburden stripping program be undertaken over the proposed quarry site.

1. Martinsen, Magne, and Wingen, P.T.,December 1991: Granite Dimension Stone Quarry Pre- Feasibiiity Study, report prepared for the Sudbury East Municipal Association t SEM A i.

2 Lumbers, S, B.,1975: Geology of the Burwash Area, Districts of Nipissing, Parry Sound, and Sudbury; Ontario Div. Mines. GR 116. 160p. Accompanied by Map 2271, scale l inch to 2 miles.

Z.fvomarechka R.1991: The Rock Lake Granite and The Sixbass Lake Intrusive. OPAP Grant.

15

CERTIFICATE

I. Robert G. Komarechka, of the City of Sudbury, in the Province of Ontario hereby certify as follows:

l That I am a consulting geologist currently residing m Sudbury.

2. That I am a graduate. BSc. Geology major, of Laurentian University of Sudbury, Ontario, a registered professional geologist in the Province of Alberta affiliated with the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers, and that I nave been practicing my profession for eight years.

3. That I do not have an interest in the properties at this time although I did have an interest at the time of field mapping.

4. That this report is based on field observations undertaken over the spring and summer of 1991.

Robert G. Komarechka P.Geol.

Dated at Sudbury, Ontario, this 30th day of January. 1992.

16

APPENDICES

17

APPENDIX* l

FIELD NOTES

IV, t rv .f/.. ...........Page

O/

No ..........Dale....

"7"

i

t"

4j--i-

~r

-i Arasr.fr1 : ! i l i j

l '

' i

! i

1

. '

.

;

1 i

i

"^

•-

H ^V

^

f

"^

*

'

1

t

1

"f

-

s-

\

1

b

'

r

1"

; :

1 i i

to

*

*

h*

)

:

^f

1

-

-- '

i

i

11K-

)

!-•w•a o-s

c cr.Dc c

"o

r .' r

41i

ii i

i ,

ii

i\

i——

^ r— i

'k^ii i1 — i

ii

l,

r

oO!

oc.

vi

i v:i

! *i

i ^i

l *^ :

o!Vi

•^

—i

^ ^

i

^

(Vi

B/r, D,0 /)

-i

Mo .

Mote. .PageNo Dote

PaZ^ ^T4^^........^j...........,.........,......,^,^. ,.e........ .......................................Page

^ •"

wt\''

ft

M

1 l l i

'I'd

IV'

#3, *..h.Zk.........,...L.L.M..

Ofcfl

o/C

fi h (r

72 y5iy^'i j

--

-

-~- -

-;"r

'

- -

v *( i

'

^ O

^9

f "S

- .

"•^

•*r'

--

; '-

'

X

f^'

T*

ATv

' T

——

S-

——

-.7

ffiS&^aiK

ffl?: ii.'td'.iiau

J&H

' --r

•--™

- " \-

*'-

* :

*-

r^A

: l

f

rNf) SJ........[).ito..^.L:v.Ui)^..(...........?...3.0..7}.^...........Page

t,...4S2,.........,:^

ji-

I. i

^ ^j

1 i f b

j™ . i .i '

w7;" " "

f'

T

j;

*!

f

';

1 - 401 C* -1' ?

ln

,/v^. ^j^/7/ 3j tJMft (l

tyo^s "/\tfib^^ - h

r7 fCAXJ ^ T; , i,

Ve,

//i~f j* J ~My ~ *c rV^vi

J,..

S-vr/A*. ( l

6V *H f .

4

l*i *V x/

't-f h . (d OM!

7 /*J^ t jl)

'ft 1

— f* f c ii* j. V.

|

'^/" ij.T~ ~~ ~*

; /7/tf' ^ JM.*,,;,^

^() Jy " l

f , "

^ J 1 ^ ;yj.'^,.r '

^ J v^l^C-

''y 'l\ ' '^ l ^i W 4 ^ ^^ ' - ' Pi l*

1

^

. :: r - . . . 1

1

\ '*. . V -5xC '

/ y v/././ ;\^

,.;0^ t 'H cvoo; -^^

,

^ A/C \ 1"A L'-

)

1 \?- -K ^f**

c^..7 i 7 -f

w^p-

— ....... —. /^ L............Z.:::!!,-^i4J.-I .-^-..,.^

....r V ' '1/1)0' "v"'*

i /2V 4^. ^ l

's V - -------..

) ^ 1 -

" ''4'"'"'

^'dc^j^S"~ ' " ' " ;

No..

Date. Page.

in

AF y^qc

F ^ ^ Vti /vi i^ppi1 *!....,. O 6y

No.... Dale.

tt-

1 '

- V

•PPWB****

Page.

/Q'.froA l

iiK.

s^

v;l

r-J3

T7 i

•*r^^^3E

4—4-

-! :

-H^-H

Z3

1—1-

3:-,—

rIt

i——

——

——

h-r

-H-

.--,.-. ,.,t-Li JL.U..L

——

-; l

ui i: .

TL

r-is*-)

CO

(D Q

.

z s ri

i i

V -u.-'u- 4

-- A *A- -

t- A-

nm—

—

Si!^l*Ci

No...

Date Page.

-l'/

l"

flA/K

17''t-1*

' No...

Date. Page

i i

O

Z

cc

oCD •o 0) ID A

-4-

f

-4—

*

-fe-J—

——

L

-f*

~o

: w to

:

CDl H.

' i

.9Bed..................lf..l.................aieo •••ON

No... Date.

—JLI/

M\

Evo b

1 ''V I* 0,

i/ '

No.. J

Date.'.4' ',.r^...J4........... 7(^....tt..(.^':.:....Page.•t,

J, Cf1

f*

"T

•^

\

w

'f |- /'O

i- / in-^ -w"?-l^-jjjj

- |"7W

C-srofa f4fe!3fefM

JMMJ

'2 *" v

1 " T

|JK

Y /'/AA'

^N

^N ——

^S ——

-h-

^"^

^^

,

,T ——

i i

.

'

'if,

—————— . ——————————— J ——

f

J(

W

t

-^-

•V

7

w

y

(

/;

-K

•p?

1rt

*,

fo

J

'f'

/*c

'":

rV

(^*-

1*

^

0'

U/

x,

7'

eM

(;

/l/i'.,

x

f i.

lU

~~~

p'0

•0'

'

/u

ft

^

^

^

-— ""

t*V

^

kl

rt

(

y\

t

— — i

^

^

i

.-

V-**

^

mffi— --

(

/w

—

At

Vi

^

sw

J'\l

d

^^i

^t

V

k\

f

i

y

c"

fV

-t

,-c

7~f\

0

^

6

^

L^/

^f

-

•^

F

i^

9

J

*;

Js

^

f

'

B^

^

M

-n,

f

"

0

X

)

^

',

f/q

r*97

,

(i

l!t'

\

M

01

'it ?

l/.-v

(.v

1

1

^

4

V

fli

^

i

(V

C

ftr QC

Op7cj

a

zt- rj

sVT1

,*

^

*

1

^

1

f

1

(

^

^

?

J

'^

7

u

H

-e

7

o

1

t

7

oc

•r-3

O

C-

o

-c

^

-

f

*

f \

-

-

r—*

1 R

: ••'

j

ij

'

p1

l

1K

k\i*

1k

k 11is•f*'1If

1i4114

f

:

Date.

No......Date......-.-

fV/Ot

A

H o '9-

7-4-t

1/W^ 0

V\

L

x:

•4^1

fn h!

rv

v

lw

r*

t-Ho

^^4

q^j

•^r

?!'m

i

rNe

Ha

lt*

1

r

tf i

ft

y *xvj. tor

1

1 —L ——l i c ri

rir~

jte

••O

*V1V

'4(C(

vw

-H

f

ft

.

o*w/

) '-y/ ^

-t 1^6-

^ hpSv

- \ir

1^4J

z''u'J(

," li, 1

1744 Cf

76,8ft

1^

1

(h

-

PH M

**\ 5

^ HM(t

,

~ Z Vo*di

*

Dana

r/' AT M/ /l

Sir/ ^

11. .........*.

^v-

TB

~\ —

t"

T~

^"^

^"

T—

~*"

——————————— T —

——————————— —

S ftft )? Off \/ \

T

x

1

l

/""^^l l~i i-,

i—

1vi

1

r4

K•^

?

(

r\

PN

NoVi53

•H

jl

T

mf'

Si^ /.J

t '

*l- C

Q-y

4

^

)0l

J

•4*'

t

f

^

P

a,*

>

y

l/

1

}

1

t37

k c

A'

M

,

t

r

\v

J

\

P**~-

l

^

H

^

^^

r 5

^

''

•*f.

jfc\

\-

^

S

(

^

•j

4r

)

(ki*l

e)

— ^

J-

*Z?

*l

V

^

-

\

r/s:

. iC -

^--

^ ^

c! ^

r

— ~ r^

G

7

^

yn

t

--a

1

5{' ^

0-

.

^^

d

it

5

r'r

i//l

J7I

P

J

(K

1*

^1-

X

ac;

A

J

^

V

o'i

e.

^

i

. .,

. ,,

..

.

__

(

..

—.

,.

—

1

1

J

..

7

-?

-(

^-(.

i '

^ ^

-

^

rtl

^

c

1H

Y

.^

K

!.5

*

J

F* /W

1S

0

C

^

-fi

*-

^

-G

'c

?

fft*

1

—

,,

"

.

1

1

r-R

i11tu

LiT

-lTs

— 8 *

r*!*j

-l

ft

*' "" f j*

-I

^'-

fo

[1SK'-i

^-•fu

4;f

AV

lJ

l,

f1

.

\41

\

aBed

ttfani w.."to.-

ONON

j

1 L i ! 1 i1

j ——

——

] 1

ra ) i i j t : i i i i -

•en

l l i 1 ^ i t t

1 j i j 1 J t i | l

1

1 l i i : i 1 j ! J

i 1 i -

1 t i 1 i i l *

' *

i ^ j i i i J— r-^*?

-:

1 1

- i j l -1— t i-.-"\

:t

1 1 H j l 1 1

X (l t * J

v-v'

'1

i

l 1 1 f- ]— l ^ •s "IS —

—

:- i t i

TJU

——

! J i | i •i —

oi | j 1 j i i

r- V

I^TTf--

\ *~j V a

j 1 -T

l T ——

i

t ^—

I.7S

1 1 ! j )

j ^ "t *-nr

- ^ ^-

i.

1 t t t ^

4

*

v*\ 1

j i i t

\ t

JL*

"1 *

*r j ——

——

4 ——

——

-

j j i j t

1 )

*-\

X

^ **(

^ *w 4^

[ O

'1 f-S

2— Cb x, n /

M r

fi ' J *~f

'vT

-^

*~

i"

W *

. J

71"

'

1 f^

V1 i i fl?

?!vP^ ir •^ •? ".i — s?

i A

^ •g — ^ — S; v ^ o ^ -i ^\

.A

7 ^f ^

J(Sr

^Y

^

"i \ Sw

•c ^. f— 1 t

\- 1 . _

J _ -

\ ^ tt TT^

-

j —

si S5

KG.

^

l

C2 i ^ -•^

j S

~

l S.

fr H-

i i i t t *HT

1

i Vr

i) j

fi

j t i j i i i\

i :*Jl l . i ..i

.* •^~- j T

——

l —s H ~^ 0^

*? t- t ~-

1 ^N i •b — fr ^

';L^

l

17

^ | -j 5. 2* /"x

0 e ^-i •^

—s

Y ^

^ ^ S.

S; •x. •^-

V

--1

C" ^'

J

^ \ ——

) ——

±~ *r-

t — }) i S

^i

, C

' )

y \ \ \ j ^

I S?

T?

1 i :

-f

— \

\ ——

—

\ \ t t^

fe^

S" " ^

1 ^ ^*

•b \ ^ss

!

^ J 1 i

\^ 4 d "4 —

——

4 M

i——

——

——

i i i i i

^i

"^

TJi

V^J

'..

T -•4 .- \ \ - v * x t — i. a — ^ h — , j \ ^vv*

4*UW

.-.V--;

1 i

_ J '~ \

' i i i ; r

j i j^ i t j : i— 4 ^**

^

a 2

2J.

0 ra

: 0

^0 ^

•D

Q) to

cc

—

W1

M0

Z

"

S.

oCB

. o "^ -

*^f

t.

UA^

.1 ^

_

_ —

J

H^

i*

CS

i

O

--S

\ i'^

1 "

i 1 J J

1 (Q

j

TO

, S

fr r "I-"

K v.-

'^'^

ti'T

^H

' J*

V' •

tli'iu

l.'".

-;.ii

rtS

lBfe

i!l^

i':J

j*:V

5?-O

^*e:

u,

Itfj: .-.i.

.

Isi

•'.'l

!fv

i~.:

8i

':'x W

-e

!ft

k

il

;^:

*MfllW,.

^7

*9

fi

frf

/"

•ON

'————.....j,

————. ..

' LI i bilON

No..

DateP3

^NO...

:cv t , IP/a; j *r Date

^.....................................x.....^

2.14643 CHERRIMAN OSO


and

THE SIXBASS LAKE INTRUSIVE

- CHERRIMAN TOWNSHIP -

Prepared by:

Robert G. Komarechka P.Geol. January 30, 1991

for:

Robert G. Ko m a re eh k a


and

THE SIXBASS INTRUSIVE

- TOWNSHIP OF CHERRIMAN -

INTRODUCTION

The original focus of this study was on an area of post grenville unmetamorphosed gabbro. This gabbro contains significant magnetite l ilmenite in some areas and gives a strong magnetic signature. This gabbro was also exceptionally tough to break. It was originally intended to assay these rocks for platinum potential and evaluate their curling stone potential.

In the course of examining the area a very large area of solid uniform granite, potentially suitable for dimension stone purposes, was located. Due to the significance of this new discovery, an additional study was undertaken to evaluate this granite.

Acknowledgement is given to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines and their Ontario Prospector's Assistance Program ( OPAP) for the funding of part of this work as well as assistance from the Ontario Mineral Incentives Program ( OMIP) for 30* funding of laboratory tests performed by Warnock Hersey Professional Services Ltd. of Toronto Ontario.

LOCATION ft ACCESS

The proposed study area is located in the northwest corner of Cherriman township in the District of Sudbury. It is located at a latitude of 46* 16'and longitude of 80* 34'.

Access to the area can be obtained by driving 30 kilometers south of Sudbury on Highway 69, just south of Estaire then turning left on to the gravel Trout Lake road and driving 25 kilometers just past Judge Lake. The proposed area is located about 2 kilometers along a gravel road to the north of the Trout Lake road. This road leads to a gravel pit operated by Fryer Forest Products.

Alternative access can also be obtained via Highway #535 by turning about 11 kilometers north of Noelville and travelling 12.35 kilometers westward on the Trout Lake road to reach the Fryer Forest Products gravel pit road mentioned earlier.

Map #1, #2 and #3 gives the general location of this site.

RESULTS OF THE SIXBASS INTRUSION STUDY

Examination of the Sixbass gabbroic intrusion has revealed that what originally appeared as several outcrops of a large body were, in fact, a series of relatively narrow vertically dipping dikes. The location of these dikes are shown on map #4. The orientation of these dikes suggest a radiating configuration about the magnetic high or a parallel orientation about the granitic syenite intrusion to the north.

Samples SB-1 and SB-2 were collected from two dikes as shown on map #4. The analysis of these particular samples revealed nothing unusual in the geochemistry of these rocks.

As a result of the lack of promising indications of any significant visible sulphide mineralization and the limited extent of these rocks, work was instead concentrated on the potential granitic dimension stone material of the Rock Lake Granite.

JENNINGS TOWNSHIP " ~

CHERRIMAN TOWNSHIP

EXISTING CONDITIONS

ROCK LAKE GRANITE

GENERAL GEOLOGY

A large area ( approximately 144 hectares) of massive to slightly foliated pink granitic rock occurs to the north of Sixbass Lake as shown on map #4. This rock is very competent with widely spaced jointing allowing for the production of large blocks. Examination of this rock indicates a very homogeneous composition and texture throughout its extent. A slight foliation occurs along the perimeter of this intrusive near its contact with the surrounding feldspathic and biotitic paragneiss while more massive material is found in the interior. A sample (SB-3 ) from a mafic band to the north of the granite was collected and assayed (see appendix l and map #3 X

Examination of thin sections of this rock has revealed the rock to consist of about 3551 plagioclase (occurring primarily as smaller interstitial crystals), 35* orthoclase (frequently as grey phenocrysts) and about 25* mafic minerals. About 5X quartz makes up the remainder of the rock. The mafic constituents of this rock occur as black irregular wispy clots about 1/8 -1 /4" across. These clots appear to be somewhat zoned with an outer zone of small randomly oriented tiny biotite crystals followed with an inner zone of amphiboles and frequently an interior of pinhead sized magnetite. This composition classifies this rock as a syenite.

The pink to red colouration of this syenite is due in large part to hematite from the mafic clots collecting in microfractures and along intercrystalline boundaries. It was noted that this colouration was leached out from surface boulders. These boulders were actually tan coloured 2' inside from the surface. Interestingly, from samples collected from sound bedrock only 6" below surface, the rock was a bright pinkish red.

As a result the beautiful texture and polish obtained from samples collected from the surface. It was felt that a program be initiated to further evaluate this stone.

DIMENSION STONE TESTING

Sample Preparation

In order to ascertain the quality of this stone it was necessary to extract a block for testing purposes. For this purpose a pionjor was rented Steel bits and plug and feathers were purchased as these were unavailable for rental. Foul weather, faulty drill steel and difficulty in establishing a face along an arcuate surface delayed extraction and limited the amount of material extracted. After 3 days work with an assistant a 2'-6" x l'-6" x 8" block was extracted. The location of this extraction is shown on map #4. Assay sample SB-4 was also collected from this location.

To insure adequate stone was available for testing and to access any variability over the area, extra material was collected from various large boulders eroded from the local bedrock. The location of these collected boulders are shown on map #4. A crane truck was hired for removal of material from the site. Material was delivered to Khouri granite in Sudbury for cutting into the required size for ASTM testing. These prepared samples were delivered to Warnock Mersey for testing. Appendix 2 gives the results of these tests.

Excellent recovery was obtained from the block extracted and only minor extra material was used from the boulder. This was desirable since leaching and microfracturing of the constituent crystals composing the rock was evident even 2' within the boulders. Interestingly even though the extracted block was taken from the surface to a maximum depth of one foot only minor leaching of hematite was observed.

Sample Descriptions

The table on the following page gives a brief description of samples removed from the site. The location of these samples are shown on map #3.

sample * dimensions volume weight

1 2-6"x T-6"x0'-8" .071 m3 .191 tonnes2 4-0"x2-0"x l'-6" .340 m3 .914 tonnes3 5'-0"x 5'-0" x 4-0" 2.832 m3 7.614 tonnes4 3-0"x2-6"x 1-6" .318 m3 .857tonnes5 5'-0" x 3'-6" x l '-O" .496 m3 l .333 tonnes

Total 10.909 tonnes

Sample l was the only sample quarried from bedrock. This sample was used to produce the majority of samples sent for testing. Although somewhat irregular in size, there was virtually no waste after cutting this block.

Sample 2 was a sound boulder from which several tiles were cut. Unfortunately, extensive leaching had occurred to this boulder and as a result the colour of these tiles were of a somewhat less attractive tan colour. In addition, on examination under a l Ox loupe, it was observed that there was numerous fine microfractures. These microfractures were much less abundant in the sample extracted from bedrock. A tile from this sample is available for viewing at the Sudbury Resident Geologist's Office.

Sample 3 was a very large boulder having a slight lineation. This boulder is currently located at the entrance to Khouri Granite and may be used at a later date for further samples.

Sample 4 was a boulder collected at the eastern perimeter of the granitic intrusion. Unfortunately this sample was rejected due to mafic inclusions of the adjacent host biotitic paragneiss.

Sample 5 was another boulder. It appeared to be quite sound and was collected for additional samples and is currently at Khouri Granite.

TEST RESULTS

All tests except for the 50 cycle freeze thaw cycle have been completed. The stone appears to adequately meet all ASTM fc CAN specifications except for the compressive strength. Since the stone samples were of an identical massive consistent homogeneous composition it is felt that the rather low and variable compressive strength maybe due to tiny

micro fractures within the constituent crystals as a result of the sample's proximity to the surface. Another reason may be that the surfaces of the cubes prepared for this test may not have been absolutely parallel or flat. Duplicate samples of these cubes retained by the author have slightly curved surfaces from polishing operations. Further compressive tests with carefully prepared samples, taken from a further depth, would confirm this hypothesis.

CONCLUSION

Very low fracture density, consistent attractive colour and fabric over a large area, the ability to take a good polish and the lack of brittle and abrasive quartz gives this rock ideal characteristics for dimension stone.

Further testing, mapping, diamond drilling (to determine horizontal fracturing and quality ) and removal of large test blocks are recommended for this very promising property.

fr:

CERTIFICATE

I, Robert G. Komarechka, of the City of Sudbury, in the Province of Ontario hereby certify as follows:

1. That I am a consulting geologist currently residing in Sudbury.

2. That I am a graduate, BSc. Geology major, of Laurentian University of Sudbury, Ontario, a registered professional geologist in the Province of Alberta affiliated with the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers, and that I have been practicing my profession for eight years.

3. That I have an interest in the properties.

4. That this report is based on field observations and technical analysis undertaken over the fall and winter of 1990.

Robert G. Komarechka P. Geol.

Dated at Sudbury, Ontario, this 30th day of January, 1991.

APPENDICIES

8

APPENDIX l

ASSAY RESULTS

8-i

Robert Komarechka FILE # 90-6401SAMPLE*

SB-1SB-2SB-3SB-4

Si02 A1203 fe203 HgO feadjKa20 K20 H02 P205 ix x x x x x x x

47.68 14.86 14.86 5.79 *Bi55j:3.45 1.06 2.59 .60 l47.79 14.39 15.65 6.01 ?7.69:3.20 1.20 2.89 .6645.59 16.64 11.16 7.33 13:06 2.69 1.15 1.14 .28 *58.22 17.97 6.11 2.51 v3;84j4.49 4.27 1.07 .54 J

Mri6jCr203Hxl x*t2tf .022''.22* .015^•21^ .029fi'lOl .006;. taf-

Bappra

627619272

2413

CuPpra

44403531

Inppra

111106

7570

®wSppra;

Sf62 :*::.75W6iww

Co SrPpra ppra

76 38473 43532 73421 1074

LaPpra

25291789

ZrPpra

10810833

284

feel y^ppra: ppra

)?201 26•;"5o; 22p35? 16v202:i 25W. '3

tibppm

20202020

TaPpm

?0202020

LOIX

,?

.6

.3

^fejki^fUx'i

100.0899.94

'loo; os100.06

CO

Robert Komarechka FILE f 90-6401SAMPLE* Ho Cu Pb

ppm ppm ppraZn 1/9; Ni Co

ppra ppra] ppra ppraHn

ppmFe

XU Au Th Sr

ppm ppm ppmSb B! Vppm ppm ppm

Au** Pt** Pd** Rh** ppb ppb ppb ppb

SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4

1 62 7 31 lil* 48 21 276 3.54 ;:4 5 m 1 241 38 4 32 1V5; 55 21 314 3.04 V 6l 5 NO 2 201 51 4 27 -J.3; 22 14 379 2.44 i-:3) 5 NO 1 621 14 2 61 :1i5j 13 9 349 2.58 ?K;4 5 NO 9 42

m.2- 2 3 110 .82 S183J 18 53 .79 183 S3ft.9 2 3 87 .70 i198; 17 39 .85 304 P?}fa 2 2 65 ^1.90 v086; 2 48 1.30 58 &1^2^ 2 2 43 .91 5175] 105 16 .94 172 S?

5 1.10 .11 .40 1M 13222 1.05 .05 .68 fi:' 3 3 2 23 1.43 .25 .19 itf; 2 1 2 22 .89 .11 .62 pi;i 1 1 2 2

APPENDIX 2

RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING OF GRANITE DIMENSION STONE

l

3-iii

Warnock Hersey

WARNOCK HERSEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ITO.January 7 1991 M IO AMERICAN DRIVE. MISSISSAUSA. ONTARIO. CANADA nvisa3 ' TEL: Hie) 671-7120- CABLE: WARNOCK MSGA

TELECOPIER: (416) 673-028}50244-C7-4308-00

Bedrock Consulting 396 Eva AVenue Suite #1Sudbury, Ontario P3C 4N3

Attention: Mr. Robert G. Komarechka

SUBJECT: Laboratory Testing of Granite Dimension Stone

REFERENCE 1) Absorption and Bulk Specific Gravity of Dimension StoneSTANDARDS: (ASTM C97-83)

2) Modulus of Rupture of Dimension Stone (ASTM C99-87)3) Compressive Strength of Dimension Stone (ASTM C170-87)4) Abrasion Resistance of Stone Subjected to Foot Traffic

(ASTM C241-85)5) Flexural Strength of Dimension Stone (ASTM C880-89)6) Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (ASTM C531-85)7) Resistance to Freeze and Thaw Testing (CAN3-A82.2)8) Standard Specification for Granite Dimension Stone (ASTM C615-85)

Dear Mr. Koraarechka:

On December 18, 1990, Warnock Hersey Professional Services Ltd. was commissioned by Bedrock Consulting to provide testing of granite dimension stone. The samples were delivered to our Mississauga laboratory as fully prepared specimens. The samples were oven dried before testing and all tests were performed in dry condition.

The following tests were performed:

a) Absorption and Densityb) Modulus of Rupturec) Compressive Strengthd) Flexural Strengthe) Abrasion Resistance to Foot Trafficf) Coefficient of Thermal Expansion

The freeze-thaw testing has commenced and results for this test will be forwarded when testing is completed. All other tests are listed in the appended Table Nos. l through 6,

Note that ASTM C615-85 specifications for granite dimension stone have been included with the results, for reference.

Cont'd.

VANCOUVER RE6INA WINNIPEG SAULT STE. MARIE HAMILTON TORONTO MONTREAL HALIFAX ANTIOCH IONO SEACH MADISON BUFFALO BALTIMORE

8-iv/

Warnock MerseyBedrock Consulting 50244-C7-4308-00 January 7, 1991

- 2

We trust that this will meet with your full report requirements. If further information is necessary please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Sincerely yours,

WARNOCK HERSEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LTD.

X

B. Wong, fi.E.Sc.SupervisorMaterials Engineering Services

BW:cc Encls.

2cc Client

B. D'Onofrio, P. Eng.ManagerMaterials Engineering Services

e-v


TABLE NO. l

ABSORPTION AND BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY (ASTM C97-83)

SampleNo.

A

fi

C

Oven Dry Weight

(gm)

876.39

877.61

876.21

SaturatedSurface Dry Weight

(gm)

878.29

879.57

878.17

Submerged Weight (gm)

554.40

552.64

551.60

Average

ASTM C615Specificat

X Absorption

(X)

0.22

0.22

0.22

0.22X

0.40Xions max.

BulkSpecific Gravity (kg/m')

2,681

2,684

2.683

2,683

2,560min.

8-vi


TABLE NO. 2

MODULUS OF RUPTURE fASTM C99-87)

:iroen No.

1A

2B

1C

ID

IE

Span (in.)

7.000

7.000

7.000

7.000

7.000

Breadth (in.)

4.047

4.070

4.050

4.054

4.050

Depth (in.)

2.365

2.383

2.381

2.368

2.365

Load to Failure

(Ibf.)

3,872

3,660

3,984

3,788

3,764

Average

ASTH C615Specifications

Modulus of Rupture

(MPa)

12.38

11.46

12.56

12.06

12.03

12.10 MPa

10.34 MPa(minimum)

6-viil i

Warnock HerseyBedrock Consulting 50244-C7-4308-00 January 7, 1991

TABLE NO, 3

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ASTM (C170-87)

Sample No.

A

B

C

D

E

^

Length (in.)

2.725

2.725

2.724

2.724

2.728

Width (in.)

2.642

2.627

2.657

2.656

2.645

Height (in.)

2.792

2.760

2.776

2.773

2.780

Loaded Area(in')

7.199

7.240

7.238

7.235

7.216.

Load to Failure (lb.)

105,000

90,000

110,000

125,000

132,000

Average

Compressive Strength(MPa)

100.6

85.7

104.8

119.1

126J.

107.3

ASTM C615-85 131 Specifications nin.

8-v/iii

Bedrock Consulting 50244-C7-4308-00 January 7, 1991

TABLE NO. 4

Warnock Mersey

FLEXURAL STRENGTH fASTM 0880-89)

:in)g

A

B

C

D

E

n No. PpeiL(in.)

10.000

10.000

10.000

10.000

10.000

Breadth. (in.)

1.498

1.505

1.500

1.499

1.511

Depth (in.)

0.991

0.989

1.005

1.000

1.005

Load to Failure

(Ibf.)

364

358

368

370

372

Flexural {Strength (MPa)

12.80

12.58

12.56

12.76

12.61

ASTM C615 Specifications n/a


TABLE

ABRASION RESISTANCE OF STONE SUBJECTED TO FOOT TRAFFIC fASTM C241-85)

Weight Weight BulkSample Original After Surface in Specific Abrasion-No. Weight Grinding Dry Weight Water Gravity Resistance

A 175.63 175.20 175.35 110.37

B 175.26 174.85 175.01 109.76

C 175.11 174.70 174.85 110.04

2.696 68.20

2.674 70.93

2.696 71.51

Average 70.21

ASTM C615 Specifications n/a


TABLE NO. 6

LINEAR COEFFICIENT OF THERMAL EXPANSION ( '(T1 ) (ASTM C531-85)

(-20'C to t22 e C) (22 e C to 115'C) Sample No. _____f "C"1 1 f'C'M

A 8.9467 x 10'* 6.0253 x 10"

B 6.6852 x 10" 5.1288 x 10"

G 8.0255 x 10" 5.5224 x 10"

D 5.7833 x 10" 9.4727 x 10"

Average 7.3602 x 10" 6.5373 x 10"

8~Xl

Warnock Hersey

WARNOCK HERSEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LTD.3210 AMERICAN DRIVE. MISSISSAU6A. ONTARIO. CANADA 14V1B3TEL: (416) 678-7820 - TELECOPIER: (416) 673-0282

March 8, 1991

50244-C7-4308-00

Bedrock Consulting 396 Eva Ave., Suite l Sudbury, Ont. P3C 4N3

Attention; Mr. Robert G. Komarechka, P. Geol.

SUBJECT: Freeze and Thaw Testing of Granite Dimension Stone

REFERENCESTANDARD: Methods of Sampling and Testing Brick (CAN3-A82.2-M78)

Dear Mr. Komarechka:

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On December 18, 1990, Warnock Hersey Professional Services Ltd. was commissioned by Bedrock Consulting to provide freeze and thaw testing of granite dimension stone. It was proposed .that the CSA brick testing standard be employed, as the service conditions for both these materials are similar.

2.0 PROCEDURE

The samples were initially trimmed with a diamond saw to obtain squarely-cut edges before oven-drying to constant weight. Freeze and thaw testing was then performed as follows with the polished surfaces oriented face-down in the trays:

One Cycle

1) Freeze @ -180C for 20 hours in 10 mm. of water.

2) Thaw @ room temperature for 4 hours immersed in water.

Steps 1) and 2) were repeated for 50 cycles. Samples were allowed to dry on the drying room floor on weekends.

.... continued

VANCOUVER REGINA WINNIPEG SAULT STE. MARIE LONDON HAMILTON TORONTO MONTREAL HALIFAX ANTIOCH LONG BEACH MADISON BUFFALO BALTIMORE

Warnock MerseyBedrock Consulting 50244-C7-4308-00 March 8, 1991

3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

- 2 -

The results shown in the appended Table No. l indicate an average weight loss of G.03% with no signs of spelling, breaking or any other apparent distress. Comparison of these results can be made to CAN/CSA-A82.1-M87 which indicates the acceptable standards for burned clay brick. Clause S.31 states that bricks subjected to 50 cycles of freezing and thawing shall exhibit: (a) No breakage and (b) not greater than Q.5% loss in dry mass of any individual brick.

4.0 CLOSURE

We trust that this will meet with your full report requirements. If additional information is necessary, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Sincerely yours,

WARNOCK HERSEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LTD.

B. Wong, ,tf.E. Se.SupervisorMaterials Engineering Services

BW:WD:mf

Encl.

2 cc: Client

W. Dang, B. Se. (Eng.)Assistant ManagerMaterials Engineering Services

Warnock MerseyBedrock Consulting 50244-C7-4308-00 March 8, 1991

Table No. 1: Freeze and Thaw Testing of Granite Dimension Stone (CAN3-A82.2-M78)

Sample No.

1

2

3

Initial DryWeight(g)

1577.6

1721.7

1605.4

1658.8

1507.4

Final DryWeight

(g)

1577.0

1720.7

1605.2

1658.7

1507.2

% WeightLoss

0.04

0.06

0.01

0.01

0.01

Average K Weight Loss 0.03

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand KMnes

OntarioitorWtlor.

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Ac

Transaction Number

Personal Information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, W Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

.U643 CHERRIMAN 900

Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate. rv - — -- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form In duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany thlswlffv^ft? 1992

Recorded Holders) , \Vj-^i\(A

, ,ckkoi

AddressrVT * b37 kAfu- S r

Telephone No,673-0073

Minng Division

PwS"*Performed

Township/Area

From: ; z i } /no

M or Q Plan No.G- -

m/Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only) * OC7

TypeWork Group

Geotechnical Survey

RehabilitationOther Authorized Work SKfl* ACTION

AssaysAssignment from Reserve

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded

holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

1 ^ li rv G-ertvJ APT! 53)WU

32/0 Wt&CAti

1 46"K

(attach a schedule If necessary)

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse sideTJatTl certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered In this work

report were recorded In the current holder's name or held under a beneficial Interest by the current recorded holder.______________________ 5 Ifti

Certification of Work Reportl certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth In this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after Its completion and annexed report is true.

Name and Address of Person Certifying

Telepone

673^73For Office Use Only

Total value cr. Recorded uaie rucoraea

jfTemedLApprovai Date

)ate Notice for Amendments Sent

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Aere di DeWloppen

i duament du Nord

et des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Creditfrat des coOts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Lol sur les mines

Transaction NO./N* de transaction

Personal Information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6AS, telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renselgnements personnels contenus dans la presente formule sont recueillis en vertu de la Lot sur le* mines et servlront a tenir a jour un registre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute quesiton sur la collece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains mlniers, ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159, rue Cedar, 4e etage, Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs

Type

WagesSalalres

Contractor's and Consultant's

Drolts ds ('entrepreneur •t de ('expert- eonsell

Supplies Used Foumltures utillsees

Equipment Rental Location de materiel

Description

Labour Maln-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type AiiaYS

csf l RiU**1 S M/'vC^

T^/N iteCWOWi

Type tA^ fZofl.

l)*tiC^.

5r^Bl?^c^s '

F/tKType

Amount Montant

5/2 c?s

2^00t? Of,,;

g 70. 00

664. DO

nts-oo2-^1

5^27^23. 87

3^1

M-60

Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs

Totals Total global

2*112-00•v\ -

mi 5 72 9fl

^20.87

283-50

7681.32

2. Indirect Costs/Coots Indlrects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les coOts indirects ne sont pas admlsslbles en tant que travaux devaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging Nourrlture et hebergementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation

Description

Type ftt'fffNb- (t f

r^ft^M

Hetts

Amount Montant

l LSI

lU.OO

.. ..l

6/^75

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partial des eoOts indirects

Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montant admissible (n'excMant pas 20 H das coOts directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur totale du credit (Total of Direct and Allowable devaluation Indirect eeitri fTetil dM eedti dinel*

Totals Total global

157.SI

frl-7,5

3/^.^'t

3/tZfc

8008.S8tt Mlrtcti idmlMlblet

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Filing Discounts

1. Work filed within two years of completion Is claimed at 10Qo/fa of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

Note : Le titulalre enregistrd sera tenu de verifier les depenses demandees dans le present etat des coOts dans les 30 jours sulvant une demande a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee, le mlnlstre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux devaluation presentes.

Remises pour depdt

1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achevement sont rembourses a 100 •Mi de la vateur totale susmentionnee du credit devaluation.

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SOW of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Tout Value ot Assessment Credit x 0.50 -

Total Assessment Claimed

2. Les travaux deposes trols, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement sont rembourses a 50 H de la valour totale du credit devaluation susmentionne. Voir les calculs ci-dessous.

Valour totale du credit devaluationx 0,50

Evaluation totale demandee

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that as{Recorded Holder, Agent, Position in Company)

to make this certification

Attestation de l'6tat des coOts

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces defenses ont 616 engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

l am authorized Et qu'a litre de je suis autoris6(titulalre enregisu*. reprtsentirtt, post* occupt dans la compagnie)

a faire cette attestation.

7^ ""r " "~* ""^ ~~Nota : Dans cetie formule, lorsqu'i! designe des personnes, le masculin est utilis* au sens neutre.

l

(T * (s\

s- r*

(T

VA

-O (T

v/*V

I

-J r*

L |m ttf III itt V o o O t o d

c* 8 p* CP

VA P b O* GO

O o O

O

VA O * - o a I o O

u^ p o of 8 O o

^ O 0 o i i 0

0

(A O O O S* 8 s O 0

Vn O o o OP

o 0 f o o

— 1 o y Cb 0 o o o

u 10 o o CD 0 o l o o

p*a

n

•d

^F

XJ

2 HK

o o CO 0 o o 0

Mv 1 CO

Co

o p o o

1"

f * A

t

c?

O'

i * di

Oa

O

1 C

redi

ts y

ou a

re c

laim

ing

in th

is re

port

may

be

cut b

ack.

In o

rder

to m

inim

ize th

e ad

vers

e ef

fect

s of

suc

h de

letio

ns, p

leas

e in

dica

te fr

om

which

cla

ims

you

wish

to p

noriz

e th

e de

letio

n of

cre

dits

. Pl

ease

mar

k (x

) on

e of

the

follo

wing

:

1. ~

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t ba

ck s

tarti

ng w

ith th

e cla

im li

sted

last,

wor

king

back

ward

s.;

2. d!

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t ba

ck e

qual

ly ov

er a

ll cla

ims

cont

aine

d in

this

repo

rt of

wor

k.3.

Z

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t bac

k as

prio

rized

on

the

atta

ched

app

endi

x.

; In

the

even

t tha

t you

hav

e no

t spe

cifie

d yo

ur c

hoice

of p

riorit

y, o

ptio

n on

e w

ill be

impl

emen

ted.

Not

e 1:

Ex

ampl

es o

f ben

efic

ial I

nter

est a

re u

nrec

orde

d tra

nsfe

rs, o

ptio

n ag

reem

ents

, mem

oran

dum

of a

gree

men

ts, e

tc.,

with

resp

ect

' to

the

min

ing

clai

ms.

t N

ote

2:

It w

ork

has

been

per

form

ed o

n pa

tent

ed o

r le

ased

land

, pl

ease

com

plet

e th

e fo

llow

ing:

l cer

tify th

at the

reco

'ced

holde

r had

a S

eria

l inte

rest

in the

pate

nted

Sign

atur

e or

leas

ed la

nd a

t the

tim

e the

wor

n wa

s pe

Date

fc

^ (T

'iA ~-

-J S" cr —

S r —

1^\

^*^

1

(T

-a —

Vi

-v*

Os

O —

vo ^*^

J

s^

C9 ~-

~ _ ,

i —

•-J r0 —

u ^w

j

^ o i —

in ^j^

i

|A —

I!| it Z

'

^

' m?^

j

L BtU nil

111 IE W Oo b o o i o d

c * i ci ^v Vo 5^*

(A O o CS 05 o o f O o

VA o o Cf 1 1 o o'

m Q o o' 8 O o

(A O 0 0 2O 8 i O

O

(/\

0 o o 8 \ o

0

VA 0 f O o 3* o o 1 o 0*

— ^ o ^ Ob o o o ex

u \ o o CD 0

0 4 o o

^~

lif

t!

b a CO o o o 0

\H*!

M('

WM CP

Co

o Q O O

1"

| 4N) 5 m

t III l(7

O

-K o

'd

c^c

n ci

5

Cred

its y

ou a

re c

laim

ing

in th

is re

port

may

be

cut b

ack.

In or

der t

o m

inim

ize th

e ad

vers

e ef

fects

of s

uch

delet

ions,

pleas

e in

dica

te fr

om

which

clai

ms

you

wish

to p

nonz

e th

e de

letio

n of

cre

dits.

Plea

se m

ark

(s)

one

of th

e fo

llowi

ng:

1. H

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t bac

k sta

rling

with

the

claim

liste

d las

t, wo

rkin

g ba

ckwa

rds.

2. d

1 Cre

dits

are

to be

cut

bac

k eq

ually

ove

r all

claim

s co

ntaine

d in

this

repo

rt of

wor

k.3.

Z C

redit

s ar

e to

be c

ut b

ack

as p

rioriz

ed o

n the

atta

ched

app

endix

.

In th

e ev

ent t

hat y

ou h

ave

not s

pecif

ied

your

cho

ice o

f prio

rity,

optio

n on

e wi

ll be

imple

men

ted.

V Vi h f l

Note

1:

Exam

ples

of b

enef

icia

l Int

eres

t are

unr

ecor

ded

trans

fers

, opt

ion

agre

emen

ts, m

emor

andu

m o

f agr

eem

ents

, etc

., w

ith re

spec

t to

the

min

ing

clai

ms.

Note

2:

If wo

rk h

as b

een

perfo

rmed

on

pate

nted

or l

ease

d la

nd, p

leas

e co

mpl

ete

the

follo

wing

:

l cer

tify th

at IK

* 'ec

o'sea

hold

er h

ad a

Oer

*fiC'

ai int

erest

m the

pate

nted

or lea

sed

Ond

at th

t tiT.

e the

wor

k wa

s pe

rform

ed

iOa

'.e'"t .i ''.,

TS

Ministry ofNorthern Development•and, Mines

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

OOP a cPersonal information collected on this form Is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Fpurth/loor^S Cedar Street, Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

development and Mines, Fourth Floor-15912. 14643Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.

- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining Recorder.

- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form In duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.

Recorded Holder(s) Client No./S 3/6

Address

Mining Divisionw? i sr

Township/Area

Telephone. No.(7^5

TToTQ-por O Plan No.6- -

99—— PerformedFrom: KAY /fr, ' To.

M,l*yV*.'VV*/ J Wb.t ,y./ . Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only) ' ' '

Work Group

Geotechnical SurveyPhysical Work, Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

dXMf C tf7wC \ &DI&/.C/91 M/Wx/iJ ^

-

RECEIVEDJUN#9 1992

MIMIMft 1 AMHC QBAMP.H

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs SNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded

holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

An f sit ktot- sr ne (C?f Sv)6ojCl

(attach a schedule If necessary)

Certification of Beneficial interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side

l certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.

Name and Address of Peison Certifying

For Office Use Onlyup STOMINING oiv.

R E Off , 0 E DDegrned Approval Dare

e 199?

l certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered In this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial Interest by the current recorded holder.______________________

Certification of Work Report

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

i VRoppement du Nord et des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Creditfctat des coOts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Lol sur tes mines

Transaction NoTN* de transaction

Personal Information collected on this form is obtained under the authority Of the Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente formule sont recueiliis en vertu de la Lol sur le* mines et serviront a tenlr a jour un registre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute queslton sur la collece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains minlers, mlnistere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159, rue Cedar, 4* etage, Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

1. Direct Costs/Couts directs

Type

WagesSalalres

Contractor's •od Consultant's Fee* Orolts de ('entrepreneur tt de ('expert- consell

Supplies Used Foumlturea utlllsees

Equipment Rental Location de materiel

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type UWCCoTr/fVCr

Type fiuWUWtfc/m-s/u-ss

wet) woToww6&C& Wfitfc

Type

Amount Montan!

3750.00

2o{0.00

A^S2.7S

Total Direct Costs Total des coOts directs *

Totals Total global

3750.60

20/0-00

57,34

;SI734

2. Indirect Costs/CoOts Indirects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment work. Pour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les coOts Indirects ne sont pas admisslbles en tant que travaux devaluation.

Type

Transportation Transport

Food and Lodging Nourrtture et hebergementMobilization and Demobilization Mobilisation et demobilisation

Description

Typo frAD 1*Au*fo0f 352k^

/CofO to/L&W* O-AtOCG^SS

Amount Montant

/OS. 46

7Uf

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partlel des coOts Indirects

Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montan! admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des coOts directs)Total Value of Assessment Credit Valeur totale du credit (Total of Direct and Allowable devaluationIndirect eettel (Total dn eadti dinel*

Totals Total global

/os. to

7/.OJ

m^(nutSW-15

M Indirect* edmltilW**

Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed In this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification Is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note: Le tilulaire enregistre' sera tenu de verifier tes depenses demandees dans le present etat des coCrts dans tes 30 jours sulvant une demande a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee, le mlnlstre peut rejeter tout ou une partle des travaux devaluation presentes.

Filing Discounts

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 100*16 of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

Remises pour depot

1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achevement sont rembourses a 100 % de la valeur totale susmentionnee du credit d'evakiation.

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SOU of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

(Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

l_ x 0.50

2. Les travaux deposes trois, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement sont rembourses a 50 tt de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentionne. Volr les calculs d-dessous.

Valeur totale du credit devaluationx 0,50

Evaluation totale demandee

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

that as(Recorded Holder, Agent, Position in Company)

to make this certification

Attestation de l'etat des cod t s

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiqu6s sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont et6 engagers pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.

l am authorized Et qu'6 litre de je suis autoris6(titulaire enregistrf. representing poste occop* dans la compagnie)

a faire cette attestation.

0212(04*1) Note : Dans cette formule. lorsqu'il desitfne des personnel, le masculin est utilise* au sens neutre.

r i •2 H i ir l1 ir ij r J^ O V\

-X 'l

l^

*

-fc I b 0

1

^ Xl (J\ vi ——

s/ **S

t*

*^ ^

~**

^ -^ 3*S ~-

^ •^ \A ~-

Vj 1*4,

**.0 s XI

CTs

-f —

^ XI X *-

^ (5V

N -

s " -

^ ^i 2i

0 ~-

^ XJ Oft ~-

~ ^ OD O* -

81! ?i if M

^

^

-V 7*^ u^ ^.a v\

O C,

S f*m

1 fm

\

r\ j* ex ^^

f 1 0 c

* -t

! ^

-4

\

t S

^ f i

A A

•OSN

-Q

A r c

-4

v\

t 8

"" ^

vAi "\ s.

-4 NA

O 1 0 o

VK *~ ^

' "^

v^

-!X

s\

C

,^ " ^^-

A *

"^5^

-A 1 Ci

,u t Xf

V 4

S"i

.v^\ o

lifr

w* iilr

*'n ( r

*y 'k -..

*-i v V/J ^\

^ ^

l ^? o^

^ i j

S

# r*

J

C^

^ l c c — j i** s

? s t 4 s 's* ^

t * og

"K ~H^

7^ ^^

c ( c c "x vj ^ t v/ V

i > s Jj

L

^ ^

,. j

o Ci

1 •^ ' N JX

.' ^ 1s

-r-

^~

^

NT

Cy H H *~ O

f ^

1 o ,^ -o ' \ \ A

Ji

Cy

(k

^

-* ~ ^

\ vg

i c ' O '"l

x -t*

* ^

4 c*

.''O

11 *.

-t*. "^

V,j ;^

;q:^

* rf

c ff

o x

llg

i^.t

*

" i "i ' x S ^ CV";i

Cred

its y

ou a

re c

laim

ing

in th

is re

port

may

be

cut b

ack.

In or

der t

o m

inim

ize th

e ad

vers

e ef

fects

of s

uch

delet

ions,

pleas

e in

dica

te fr

om

which

cla

ims

you

wish

to p

rioriz

e th

e de

letio

n of

cre

dits.

Plea

se m

ark

.x) o

ne o

f the

follo

wing

:

1. D

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t bac

k st

artin

g wi

th th

e cla

im li

sted

last,

work

ing b

ackw

ards

.2.

D C

redit

s ar

e to

be

cut b

ack

equa

lly o

ver a

ll cla

ims

cont

ained

in th

is re

port

of w

ork.

3. D

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t bac

k as

prio

rized

on

the

atta

ched

app

endix

.

In th

e ev

ent t

hat y

ou h

ave

not s

pecif

ied

your

cho

ice o

f prio

rity,

optio

n on

e wi

ll be

imple

men

ted.

f!?

e ;i?

* ''

^ f

,.'

V;.'

i..

Note

1 :

Exam

ples

of b

enef

icial

Inte

rest

are

unr

ecor

ded

trans

fers

, opt

ion

agre

emen

ts, m

emor

andu

m o

f agr

eem

ents

, etc

., w

ith re

spec

t to

the

min

ing

claim

s.

Note

2:

If w

ork

has

been

per

form

ed o

n pa

tent

ed o

r lea

sed

land

, ple

ase

com

plet

e th

e fo

llow

ing:

l cer

tify

that

the

reco

rded

hol

der

hxt a

ben

efic

ial i

nter

est i

n th

e pa

tent

ed

Of le

ased

land

at t

he ti

me

the

work

was

per

form

ed.

Sign

atur

ei D

ate

B l i!O i ir i ji ir i i * j i f

*

\P xj

xl —

1 ~-

S/ K^

•X X Q f~

i •^ •* J N

S!i

v\ -

5 ON —

XI *-

V -O -

0 Ch -

VP

-A O -

vn XJ ea ^

(fi

OD oa* -

ill! CWmNumt

(999 Not9 i ^* iH

y i b o

U —0

-ja o i O

0

-o o y 0 C

0\ -o i ^ \r i O o

V.,A -o

i r-Q ? C

V/,A

t —o

J S i1 8

VA i —a

Â t *

VA —ex

l V/3

N/X

O 1 o o

VA -Q -A C

VA t -t* t *

(^ -ES

f v/V

^ c^ Q)

Value

of

Assessment

Work

Done

on this

CWm

-l* l 5^3 (o,

-^ ~*4 *

t P ^ ^

-Si

^Q

^JO

^S

^L

^ i c (

f y ) '^ ^

VjsJ

.i 1 ( ( PN

^ i 'g ^-A ^-

Q JJ

f* c ( ; C C

N > ^ r cS ^

1

c C 1 f

>

•x. k i 'MV

^^ ^

•x

Cy (^ (^G^ ^

"N. r~^ ^

*> o6^ ^

^^^

-0

A* Cy

( k

4 ( .

v fi^\

A

vA 1

j C ' O

*\ ^

"' vi ^

x.

7"^ A

î /'O

C " ^

^ î f \Ut 5 a

) *Q

*3

Si- s. j Id

Cred

its y

ou a

re c

laim

ing

in th

is re

port

may

be

cut b

ack.

In or

der t

o m

inim

ize th

e ad

vers

e ef

fects

of s

uch

delet

ions,

pleas

e in

dica

te fr

om

which

cla

ims

you

wish

to p

rioriz

e th

e de

letio

n of

cre

dits.

Plea

se m

ark

(^)

one

of th

e fo

llowi

ng:

1 . D

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t bac

k St

artin

g wi

th th

e cla

im li

sted

last,

work

ing

back

ward

s.2.

D C

redit

s ar

e to

be

cut b

ack

equa

lly o

ver a

ll cla

ims

cont

ained

in th

is re

port

of wo

rk.

3, Q

Cre

dits

are

to b

e cu

t bac

k as

prio

rized

on

the

atta

ched

app

endix

.

In th

e ev

ent t

hat y

ou h

ave

not s

pecif

ied

your

cho

ice o

f prio

rity,

optio

n on

e wi

llbe

imple

men

ted.

Note

1 :

Exam

ples

of b

enef

icial

Inte

rest

are

unr

ecor

ded

trans

fers

, opt

ion

agre

emen

ts,

to th

e m

inin

g cla

ims.

Note

2:

If wo

rk h

as b

een

perfo

rmed

on

pate

nted

or l

ease

d la

nd,

l cer

tify

that

the

reco

rded

hol

der h

ad a

ben

efici

al in

tere

st in

the

pate

nted

or le

ased

land

at t

he ti

me

the

work

was

per

form

ed.

plea

se c

ompl

ete

, y li vi i )\ ,* . i

mem

oran

dum

of a

gree

men

ts, e

tc.,

with

resp

ect

' ?'i hi-^

.A.

the

follo

win

g:

Â

.

S gn

atur

eDa

te .

, ,

•i

ntario

Ministry of Ministere duNorthern Development D6veloppement du Nordand Mines et des Mines

September 2, 1992

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines159 Cedar Street, 2nd FloorSudbury, OntarioP3E 6A5

Dear Sir:

Geoscience Approvals SectionMining Lands Branch159 Cedar Street, 4th FloorSudbury, OntarioP3E 6A5

Telephone: (705) 670-7265 Fax: (705) 670-7262

Our File: 2. 14643 Transaction #: W9270. 00026

W9270.00025

RE: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK ON MINING CLAIMS S 1117688 ET AL. IN CHERRIMAN TOWNSHIP.

The assessment work credits listed on the above mentioned reports of work have been approved as of September l, 1992.

If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact Dale Messenger at (705) 670-7253.

Yours sincerely,

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands BranchMines and Minerals Division

DEM/j l Enclosures:

cc:..lAssessment Files Office Toronto, Ontario

Resident Geologist Sudbury, Ontario

*::*,y,v,'f.

Ontario

Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern DevelopmentResources and Mines

IN SERVICE OCT.3/89

tO LAND DISPOSITION

PLAN

TOWNSHIP

CHERRIMAN

M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT*-

SUDBURYMINING DIVISION

SUDBURYLAND TITLES/REGISTRY DIVISION

SUDBURY

Scale 1:20 000

Mvtm1000 2000

Urtrm

' 1000 FMt

1000 2000 3000 4000 9000 •000 7000 MOO MWO 10000

Contour Interval 10 Metres

BoundaryTownship, Meridian, Baseline...

Road allowance;

Lot/Concession;

SYMBOLSv

surveyed shoreline

surveyed, unsurveyed ..

Parcel; surveyedi.............unsurve^red.....

Right-of-way; roadrailway ..........jrtillly............

Reservation....!.........

Cliff, Pit, Pile......L........

ContourInterpolated.. Approximate .

l

Depression.....

Control point (horizontal)

Flooded land y,...,.............

Mine head frame

Pipeline (above ground)

Railway; single, Irac k.double tra 3k... abandonej....

4* Road; highway, county, township .. access .....|......V.......trap, bush

Shoreline (original).

Transmission line

Wooded area....................

A

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS'ION

PatentSurface A Mining Rights Surface Rights C nly.... Mining Rights Only.....

LeaseSurface A Mininci Rights Surface Rights Only- .. Mining Rights Only.....

Licence of Occupat on

Order-in-Council. ^........

Cancelled

Reservation

^and A Gravel.

.a

.e

.H

.B

..T

.OC

Map base and land dBranch, Ministry of K atural Resources

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITIONMRO - Mining Rights OnlySRO - Surface Rights OnlyM + S - Mining and Surface Rights

DMCftptton OrdtrNo.

PUBLIC ACCESS

DUMP SITE

ra*

MAR./82 S.R.O.

AUG./83 S.R.O.

fl-J

^/"''/v'.,1 '.;*'

DATE OF ISSUE

m 3 c*WDBunr

MMWQ MC08DWS OffKC

NOTES

SUBDIVISION OF THIS TOWNSHIP INTO LOTS AND CONCESSIONS WAS PARTIALLY ANNULLED ON JULY 50,1135

ALL ISLANDS IN T ROUT LAKE ARE RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE { SURFACE R IGHTS ONLY) FILE (63005 Nov. ia,!95B.

THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMWLED FROM VAftOMS SOURCES, AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED. THOSE VW6M+NG TO ***tWMIN- ING CLAIMS SHOUtD CON- SULT WITH THE WIWWG RECORDER MINISTRY OF NOflTHfRN OEVEi-OP- MENT AND MINES, FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THf LANDS SHOWN HEttEON.

oIN)

O Xm

H^ID

' -f..4. '

T^position drafting by Surveys and Mapping The disposition of land, location of tot f fork: i

this Index was compfled for administrative puJ

Q,l

A O

LEG

EN

D

LIT

HO

LOG

YBI

OTIT

E AM

PHIB

OLE-

GME

ISS

PORP

HYRI

TIC

AMPH

IBOL

E K

OM

IDN

HE

BIO

TIT

E

QU

f^R

TTL

NAO

K7LO

MIT

E G

-fOEl

SS

OU

VH

NL

FAB

BR

O

- PO

5T

GR

EM

VlL

Lf

BIOT

ITE,

AMP

HIBO

LE M

AFIC

SW

AK

P

CR

EE

K

OR

P

RQ

liOfi&

B

Of

SH

iEE

T

up ;

E

OF

CLA

ttt

LIM

E

; ^0

57

LINE

LOAO

O L

DEF

ECTS

SE

HE

RA

LLY

M

AlR

UN

E.

FR

AC

TU

RE

W

ITH

8T

0

PA

RA

LLE

L B

IFU

RC

AT

/K/G

- F

RA

CT

UR

ES

DIK

EL

ET

, f

rf W

E. R

ALLY

i

OF B

IOTI

T

2.VJ

C)

OR

AU

EU

R

.OA

P

POO

R

4 W

;D

RoA

D

OR

L u

oo

t

E IR

ATE

LY

SO

ON

P/

5 -

STO

CK

Y ,

A

S -A

PA

RE

NT

LY

G-M

R1S

SOS

/TY

M A

H C

? D

ltff

to A

A Q

HP

H/&

QL6

R*

'C//

Q U

A ft

7 ?

U^

/A/6

F7

K A

F/ C

QU

AR

RY

•-5I

U76

37

L S

iooE

7G94

-S

IH76

93

S 11

17 G

9Z6

/M

f 7

6 S

l

H7

6 8

8

l IC

MOO

E.

THE

GEO

LOG

Y cW

S

TRU

CTU

RE

T

HE

R

OC

K

LAK

E

PLU

TON

!L

\\VO

OE

TOW

NSH

\P

Ro

bei

-i

G. K

omar

ecU

kaL

tl^B

SE

Ja^u

avy

30,

13 3

\w

MA

P

SC

AL

E

41ie7SE8e02 2.14643 CHERRIMAN

geology and structure of the rock lake granite ........... l m l •••illllllll 41ie7se0ee2...

Documents