general meeting 2014 - france-ix€¦ · – taking into account short distance between pops and...
TRANSCRIPT
General Meeting 2014
Technical Overview By Simon Muyal
26th September 2014
Agenda
1/25
Agenda France-IX Technical update
Fibre infrastructure renewal Optical layer: DWDM solution
Issue of 18th of August : Some explanations
2/25
Fibre infrastructure renewal
3/25
Iliad - Vitry TeleCity Courbevoie
Interxion-5
Interxion-2
Telehouse-2 Telecity
Condorcet
Interxion-1
FranceIX PoP - Edge FranceIX PoP - Core nx10 Gbps
Fibre infrastructure renewal
4/25
• Redundancy – each Edge PoP connected to 2 core PoPs – Different paths to avoid SPOFs
• Quality of the fiber Important for 100G
– Short paths ( <20km) even if it is more expensive ( permit to save money for DWDM infrastructure)
– PMD reports
• New fiber infrastructure Makes deployment easier
Fibre infrastructure renewal Main goals
5/25
• Some links provided by DC • For the other links, 3 offers very competitive
Fibre infrastructure renewal Tender and Selection
Deployment: Done in June
3 links 3 links
6/25
Iliad - Vitry TeleCity Courbevoie
Interxion-5
Interxion-2
Telehouse-2 Telecity
Condorcet
Interxion-1
FranceIX PoP - Edge FranceIX PoP - Coeur
Fibre infrastructure renewal
6’/25
Optical layer DWDM solution
7/25
Comparison between
Optical layer: different solutions
100Gbps Active DWDM
(Adva, Alcatel, etc) Too expensive,
even with long term scenarios
40 channels passive MUX with nx10Gbps
100Gbps
Passive MUX + amplifiers Too expensive, even with
long term scenarios
100Gbps
BW (once per fiber) Not scalable,
difficult to maintain
8/25
• 40 channels passive MUX with nx10Gbps – Taking into account short distance between PoPs and the high
price for 100G line cards, this solution is the most appropriate – Starting with 10x10G (100G of capacity) for core backbone links – Up to 400G of capacity, just adding transceivers in the routers
easy to evolve
Optical layer: selected solution
selected for 40Ch-MUX selected for DWDM transceivers
9/25
Backbone infrastructure renewal
10/25
• Replace core switches (3 PoPs): – Support 100Gbps in the main PoPs – Increase 10Gbps density
• Replace edge switches (4 PoPs) by existing core switches (Brocade MLX): – Homogeneous configuration
(VPLS and L2 filtering in the edge) – Increase capacity
• Lease financing
Main goals Backbone infrastructure renewal
11/25
• ALCATEL/LUCENT • BROCADE • CISCO • EXTREME • JUNIPER
Short-list
Tender and selection Backbone infrastructure renewal
12/25
Juniper selected: EX9200, 14 slots
Tender and selection Backbone infrastructure renewal
13/25
Best note taking following criteria
Tender and selection Backbone infrastructure renewal
Price (leasing mandatory)
40%
Technical Installation delays 10% mandatory and
optional criteria
30% Vendor support
20%
POC to validate technical part
14/25
Tender and selection Backbone infrastructure renewal
One week to perform 31 tests: OK - 2 EX9200 - 1 MLX-16 - 1 IXIA - servers
March April
Done in
15/25
Test 1 IPv4 and IPv6 configuration OK Test 2 Jumboframes OK Test 3 ISIS configuration (Multi-Topology ISIS) OK Test 4 MPLS configuration OK Test 5 VPLS configuration OK Test 6 … OK … … …
Rollout schedule
POC
Fiber
DWDM
EX9214 (Core)
Brocade (Edge)
Deployment (October/Nov)
Staging (June/July) Deployment (end of July)
June
End of May/June
March/April
16/25
Iliad - Vitry TeleCity Courbevoie
Interxion-5
Interxion-2
Telehouse-2 Telecity
Condorcet
Interxion-1
Juniper EX 9214 Brocade MLX 16
Fibre infrastructure renewal
Brocade MLX 16 Force 10
16’/25
3 new PoPs available (or coming soon)
DC3 (Vitry)
17/25
Saint-Denis
Aubervilliers
18th of August issue
18/25
Two main issues
12:00 Some flooded traffic, around 300Mbps Some impact for members
15:00
Loop amplifying the 300Mbps of traffic reaching 2Gbps of flooded traffic on some interfaces Big impact for members, Route Servers impacted
19/25
• Flooded traffic appeared again during the week several times – Flow monitoring was disabled
Two main issues
17:00
18:00
Loop stopped
Flooding traffic stopped
20/25
Flooding issue investigation
Some sniffers installed in the backbone • Flooded traffic was unicast traffic (and not broadcast)
Bug detected on Juniper devices: • Root cause: Issue occurs randomly when an
interface is flapping. The issue didn’t appear during the POC.
• Control plane and forwarding plane are not coherent problem when the MAC address entries are replicated to the forwarding engines (PFE) • “Unknown unicast” policer didn’t work as
expected 21/25
Preventing the issue from occurs again
In the meantime, to prevent issue occurs again, we installed an event script to be proactive,
Unknown unicast traffic is checked every 5 seconds
If flooded traffic is not legitime, we clear VPLS entries
corresponding with the MAC addresses where flooded traffic
is observed.
22/25
A fix will be available soon
The fix should be available soon
A fix is currently tested by
in November
23/25
Improvements
On our side: - Route servers: Direct connection to core routers - Clearing abnormal traffic: proxy ARP, RA packets, STP, CDP/FDP, OSPF/ISIS, … FranceIX expects more reactivity from JUNIPER if an issue occurs: - JTAC more available when we open a case - We consider exchanges between Juniper Engineering team (US) and JTAC too slow
24/25
Thank you for your attention