gen105 r9 appendix f

2
Appendix F GEN/105 Version 9 1 Associate Level Material Appendix F Academic Honesty Articles Worksheet Resource: University Library Find at least two articles on the subject of academic honesty in the University Library. Complete the chart below. Article 1 Article 2 What keyword search did you use to find the article? academic honesty academic honesty In which database did you locate the article? EBSCO Host EBSCO Host What is the title of the article? Honesty and Heroes: A Positive Psychology View of Heroism and Academic ACADEMIC DISHONESTY: A Zero Tolerance Professor and Student Registration Choices Who is the author or authors? Staats, Sara Hupp, Julie M. Hagley, Anna M Levy, Elliott S. Rakovski, Carter C. When was the article published? Jul2008 Sep2006 Was the article peer reviewed? No Yes Outline three major points the author made in the article. Academic honesty is under-researched in comparison to academic dishonesty. College and university faculty and administrators are responsible for

Upload: alastair-harris

Post on 08-Nov-2014

31 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Gen105 r9 Appendix f

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gen105 r9 Appendix f

Appendix FGEN/105 Version 9

1

Associate Level MaterialAppendix F

Academic Honesty Articles Worksheet

Resource: University LibraryFind at least two articles on the subject of academic honesty in the University Library. Complete the chart below.

Article 1 Article 2

What keyword search did you use to find the article? academic honesty academic honesty

In which database did you locate the article?

EBSCO Host EBSCO Host

What is the title of the article? Honesty and Heroes: A

Positive Psychology View ofHeroism and Academic

ACADEMIC DISHONESTY: A Zero Tolerance Professor and Student Registration Choices

Who is the author or authors?

Staats, SaraHupp, Julie M.Hagley, Anna M

Levy, Elliott S.Rakovski, Carter C.

When was the article published?

Jul2008 Sep2006

Was the article peer reviewed? No Yes

Outline three major points the author made in the article.

Academic honesty is under-researched in comparison to academic dishonesty.A low probability of punishment is reflected by few tried cases of academic misconduct.The authors consider heroes persons who are courageous, have empathic concern for others, and have a high degree of honesty.

College and university faculty and administrators are responsible for constructing academic honesty policies and communicating them to students. This is often attempted through institutional honesty policies and university-wide honor codes. While these approaches have been widely researched, less attention has been given to the role of individual faculty members.

What did the author conclude According to figure 4 The findings regarding

Page 2: Gen105 r9 Appendix f

Appendix FGEN/105 Version 9

2

in the article? What were the findings?

Heroes intended to cheat less in the future than did nonheroes. Others would cheat more than self, and there was a trend for nonheroes to see the greatest likelihood of others to cheat in the future.

different instructors’ approaches toward academic dishonesty indicate that an intolerant policy will keep dishonest students away, but at a price—it will also detract many honest students.

How does this article apply to your work as a student?

It simply tells me that I must have personal integrity when submitting my work.

It tells me that I must comply with the academic honesty policies. Not only do my instructors have to communicate the policies they have to enforce them as well.