gawad parangal for local government units – cooperative development
TRANSCRIPT
Best Performing Local Government Units –
Cooperative Development Offices
Theme: Exemplary Performance in Providing
Support Services to Cooperatives
BEST PERFORMING LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS- COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICES
A. Provincial
B. Municipal or Component City
C. Chartered City
Theme: EXEMPLARY PERFORMANCE IN PROVIDING SUPPORT SERVICES TO
COOPERATIVES
Eligibility/ Qualifying criteria• Must come from the following:
– Province
– Municipality
– Chartered City
• Formally organized/ established/created office
– With separate staff and budget
– With resolution, ordinance, EO
– With office/physical structure
• With Cooperative Development Officer duly appointed/ designated (full time)
• Must have cooperative development programs
• Must be endorsed by at least one cooperative in the area
Evaluation/ Judging Criteria:
Criteria Weight/Points
1. Organization, Management & Leadership
35
2. Program implementation 62
3. Awards and recognition 3
TOTAL 100
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
1. Office memorandum, Ordinance or Executive Number Order creating the CDO
2. List of the Officers and staff certified by LGU’s personnel officer including the status of appointment
3. Short (annual) and long-term (3-5 years)Development Plans and programs for co-op development
4. List of Policy/ local issuances affecting cooperatives
5. Approved Budget & Work and financial Plan of the Unit
6. Annual Accomplishment Reports attested by the Mayor/Governor
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS7. Detailed summary report of trainings, mentoring and
consultancy attested by the Mayor showing the ff:
A. Training
- Title of training
- No. of cooperative participants
- Amount spent
- Date of training
B. Mentoring
- Nature of mentoring
- Name of cooperative beneficiary
C. Consultancy
- Nature of consultancy
- Name of cooperative beneficiary
DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS8. List of cooperatives assisted in terms of compliance to legal
requirements (e.g. CTE, etc.)
9. Proof of marketing support to cooperatives- pictures, approved training design, activity report
10. List of cooperative organized
11. Proof for cooperative promotions
- Flyers, newsletter, primers, etc.
- Pictures of tarpaulin
- Website
- Evidence of radio and TV programs
12. Disbursement report of cooperative for financial assistance
13. Proof of CDA-LGU Partnership(i.e. MOA)
14. List of awards/ recognitions received by the cooperative including the sponsor of the awards and the year received (provincial/ city/ regional/national levels) for the past 3 years.
I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (35)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
1. Presence of the following:
Cooperative development office structure
5 5
Utilization of Funds for CDP operation and programs
5 5
With at least 3 personnel- all full time personnel- at least 2 full time personnel- at least 1 full time staff
531
5
2. No. of cooperatives with CGS over total number of operating cooperatives on the area
75% - 100%50% but below 75Below 50%
210
2
I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (35)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
3. no. of operating cooperatives over total no. of registered cooperatives (MOV: operating coops as of Dec. 2013)
80% - 100%60% but below 80%40% but below 60%Below 40%
5310
5
4. Presence of the following Plans and programs for the cooperativedevelopment
5 5
Policy initiatives/ local issuances for co-op development
- Above policy initiatives/local issuances
- 2 – 4 policy initiatives/ local issuances
- 1 policy initiative/ local issuances
5
3
1
5
I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (35)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
5. Accreditationform CDA as training providers
Accredited by the CDA as cooperative training provider
3 3
SUB- TOTAL 35
II. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION (62)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
1. Provisions of Technical Assistance to cooperative in terms of:
a. Training 10 and above technical assistance 7 – 9 technical assistance3 – 6 technical assistanceBelow 3 technical assistance
5310
5
b. Mentoring 10 and above activities7 – 9 activities3 – 6 activitiesBelow 3 activities
5310
5
c. Consultancy 10 and above activities7 – 9 activities3 – 6 activitiesBelow 3 activities
5310
5
II. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION (62)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
3. no. of cooperativesassisted in the application/ renewal of CGS, CTE other LGU legal requirements
No. of cooperatives assisted in the application ----------------- x 100%No. of operating cooperatives in the area90% - 100%75% but below 90%50% but below 75%Below 50%
5310
5
II. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION (62)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
4. Providing support to cooperatives such as establishment of trading centers, display of coop products, trade fairs, product development and packaging, cliquing, product linkaging, b2b system , etc.
5 and above activities3 – 4 activities1 – 2 activitiesNo activity
5310
5
II. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION (62)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
5. Promotion and Development of Coops / movement
Provision of Assistance in the organization of cooperativesPromotion of members in cooperatives (e.g. effort, strategies to promote coops, newsletter) Advocacy/ participation to local and international conferences, summits, conventions, etc.
3
3
33
12
II. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION (62)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
6. InformationDissemination of CDA issuances, circulars, guidelines and programs
10 and above activities7 – 9 activities3 – 6 activitiesBelow 3 activitiesNo activity
86420
8
7. Partnership/ linkaging with other organizations, local, and international
Local International
22
4
8. CDA- LGU partnership (MOV : LGU MOA)
Presence of MOA 3 3
II. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION (62)
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
8. Providing / facilitating assistance( financial and non – financial) for coops’ growth and enterprise/ livelihood development
10 and above coops assisted7 – 9 coops assisted3 – 6 coops assistedBelow 3 coops assisted
5310
5
9. Social responsibility to community( i.e. calamity assistance, medical mission, feeding program, environmental protection)
5 and above activities participated3 – 4 activities participated1 – 2 activities participatedNo activity participated
5310
5
SUB – TOTAL 62
III. AWARDS AND RECOGNITION
Criteria Formula Points Max rating
1. Recognition/citation received
Awards and recognition received for the past three yearsCitation for exemplary performance
3
International awards received (including ISO certification)Local Awards received
- national awards- regional award( provincial/ city/
municipality/ barangay/ purok)
1
11
SUB- TOTAL 3
GRAND TOTAL 100
For Information and Dissemination
Josefina B. BitonioOIC Director
Encoder
Eric Justine R. Ancheta OJT – University of Luzon
Summer 2014