gas adsorption and wettability properties of coal surfaces · gas adsorption and wettability...

1

Click here to load reader

Upload: hanhan

Post on 24-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gas Adsorption and Wettability Properties of Coal Surfaces · Gas Adsorption and Wettability Properties of Coal Surfaces T. Chaturvedi , G. Tang, and A. R. Kovscek, Petroleum Engineering,

Gas Adsorption and Wettability Properties of Coal SurfacesT. Chaturvedi , G. Tang, and A. R. Kovscek, Petroleum Engineering, Stanford University

Adsorption Isotherm

Measurement and modeling

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 500 1000 1500

Pressure, psia

Ads

orbe

d, S

CF/

ton adsorption

desoprtion

CH4

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 200 400 600 800 1000

Pressure, psia

Adso

rptio

n, s

cf/t

adsoprtion-measurementmodeldesorption-measurementmodel

CO2

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200Pressure, psia

Ads

orpt

ion.

scf

/t adsorption-measurementmodeldesorption-measurementmodel

N2

Electronic balance

Coreholder

Pressure gauge

Pressure gauge

Reference cell

Gas Cylinder

Vacuum Pump

bPbPVV m

+=

1

mm bVVP

VP 1

+=

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0 500 1000 1500Pressure, psia

Ads

orbe

d, S

CF/

ton

adsorptiondesoprtion-0desorption-1desorption-2

CH4

Constants Vm b

CH4 714.8 0.0029

CO2 1666.7 0.0062

N2 263.2 0.0025

Langmuir ConstantsLangmuir Constants

Effect of Initial water saturation on gas adsorption

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

Pressure, psia

Adso

rbed

, SC

F/to

n

adsorption@Swi=0

adsorption@Swi=8.67%

CH4

V=gas adsorptionP=pressureVm=saturation adsorption constantb=constant

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 200 400 600 800 1000

Pressure, psia

Ads

orpt

ion,

scf

/t

adsoprtion@Swi=0adsoprtion @Swi=8.47%

CO2

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

Pressure, psia

Ads

orpt

ion.

scf

/t adsorption@Swi=0adsorption@Swi=8.54%

N2

Initial water saturation apparently affects gas adsorption/desorption behavior. Compared to dry coal, gas adsorption on wet coal surfaces decreases about 10-20%. This behavior is ascribed the coverage of coal surfaces by water phase.

Wettabilty of Coal Surfaces:

Variation with Structural Constant

02468

101214161820

0 5 10pH

Con

tact

Ang

le

Order 10Order 11Order 12

Young-Laplace Augmented Equation

Pc = σ*1r1

+1r2

⎝ ⎜ ⎞

⎠ ⎟ + h( )∏

Frumkin Derjaguin equation

( ) ( ) ⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+⎟

⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+= ∫

∞**

*

11cos hhdhhh

ππσ

θ

Relatively little is known about the wettability of coal surfaces with large volumes of carbon dioxide adsorbed. Wettability of solid surfaces determines the affinity of water for the surface and affects how easily coal beds are dewatered as well as the fate of water that may imbibe into a dewatered coal bed where CO2 has been sequestered. We measure wettability in terms of the contact angle that the liquid forms with the coal surface. The lesser the contact angle the more is the spread of the liquid and greater the wettability. To calculate numerically the contact angle, we use the formulation developed by Frumkin and Derjaguin that correlates the disjoining pressure with contact angle formed.

We are most interested in CBM systems in the presence of CO2. The major impact of CO2 at these pressures is that it changes the pH of the solution. We are therefore looking at the change in the wettability of the system with change in pH. We have tried to explain this phenomenon based on fundamental theory for the wettability of surfaces.

Impact of Electrostatic Pressure on Disjoining Pressure

Future Work•Perform experiments for pH values of 10,8,6,4,2 •Study the effect of initial water imbibition.•Study effects of CO2 injection on drainage and imbibition rates. •Comparison of supercritical CO2 behavior to low pressure gas.

Experiments & Results•To validate our suggested model, we are in the process of doing imbibition studies for different pH.•As suggested in literature the curves obtained have a linear relationship between the square root of time and mass imbibed.•pH 12 imbibes at a much faster rate as compared to pH 7 and pH 3. •However pH 3 also imbibes faster than pH 7 suggesting that wettability goes through a minimum.

Pore Level scenario for CO2 injection

Hysteresis

Coal surfaces have a strong affinity for carbon dioxide making them an attractive geological formation for sequestration. Typically, history matches to water and gas flow in CBM reservoirs indicate water wetness, despite the fact that coal macerals are organic and hydrophobic. It is postulated that mineral inclusions alter coalbed wettability by providing water wet pathways. Moreover, CBM production generally occurs in a depletion mode where adsorption/desorption hysteresis is not relevant. Replacement of methane with carbon dioxide on coal surfaces, however, may affect the physical nature of the coal surface. Certainly, aqueous solution pH decreases with the addition of carbon dioxide. Coal properties such as wettability and the degree of hysteresis displayed during adsorption and desorption are a function of the gas adsorbed, aqueous solution pH, and temperature. Establishing the fundamentals of coal adsorption/desorption hysteresis and coalbed wettability is thus important for understanding dewatering of coalbeds under pressure depletion conditions and as a response to carbon dioxide injection.

The experimental program has revealed significant hysteresis among adsorption and desorption on powdered coal for all gasses examined. The general trend is of significant retention of gas as pressure is reduced. There are several nonexclusive explanations for adsorption/desorption hysteresis (Adamason and Gast 1997):

• irreversible change of pore structure accompanying adsorption• contact angle hysteresis• micropores with width less than 200 nm• capillary condensation• heterogeneous surface geometry

Given our conditions of temperature, substrate, and gasses, the most likely explanation is a combination of capillary condensation and surface heterogeneity as explored by Seri-Levy and Avnir(1993) using Monte Carlo simulations :

P/P0 = 0.13 P/P0 = 0.13

P/P0 = 0.61 P/P0 = 0.61

Adsorption Desorption

Rough surface

red = adsorbed gas; blue = unadsorbedgas

P/P0 = 0.13 P/P0 = 0.61

Calculated and Measured Values of Contact angles

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 5 10pH

thet

a

No A variationLinearly varying HamakerExperimental wettability

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

0 500 1000 1500

Pressure, psia

Ads

orpt

ion,

scf

/t adsoprtion, CO2 desorption, CO2

desoprtion, CH4 adsorption, N2

desorption, N2 adsorption, CH4