gamma spectroscopy in the fermium region at ship · studies at ship since 2010 22. 6. 2013 padova,...
TRANSCRIPT
Gamma spectroscopy in the
fermium region at SHIP
Nuclear Structure Physics with Advanced Gamma-
Detector Arrays, Padova June 10-12, 2013
Stanislav Antalic
Comenius University, Bratislava
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 2
Collaboration
University of Jyväskylä
M. Leino
JAEA Tokai
K. Nishio
GSI Darmstadt
F. P. Heßberger
D. Ackermann
S. Hofmann
S. Heinz
B. Kindler
I. Kojouharov
B. Lommel
R. Mann
B. Sulignano
(presently in Saclay)
Comenius University
(Bratislava)
S. Antalic
Š. Šáro
Z. Kalaninová
B. Streicher
(presently in GSI Darmstadt)
Helmholtz Institut
Mainz
L.-L. Andersson
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 3
Transuranium nuclei
Desired region of
double magic nuclei
No chance to access it
with present technique
Desired region of
double magic nuclei
No chance to access it
with present technique
Region accesible by present technique
Production rate 1 event / week
Region accesible by present technique
Production rate 1 event / week
Region accessible for nuclear spectroscopy
10 – 1000 nuclei / hour
Rich source for the nuclear structure data
Region accessible for nuclear spectroscopy
10 – 1000 nuclei / hour
Rich source for the nuclear structure data
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 4
SHIP separator
Efficiency ~30 %
Flight time ~ 1-2 ms
Bi2O3, PbS target – 400 mg/cm2
Rotating wheel – 31 cm diameter
48Ca ~ 1200 pnA
B. Kindler et al. NIM A561,107 (2006)
Detectors: S. Hofmann and G. Münzenberg, RMP 72, 733 (2000)
Separator: G.,Munzenberg, et al., NIM 161, 65 (1979)
Back detector PSSD Ge-Clover
Esc. a, b Recoils
e a
CE , RTG
ff
+ high intensity beam
+ reliable setup
+ low background
- Low granularity
- Lack of beamtime
+ high intensity beam
+ reliable setup
+ low background
- Low granularity
- Lack of beamtime
Studies at SHIP since 2010
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 5
270Ds5.1 m s
10.97 α
180 µ s
10.95α
271Ds56 m s
10.68 α
1.1 m s
10.71α10.74
Ds267Ds
3 µ s
11.60 α
269Ds170 µ s
11.11 α
270Mt819 ms
10.03 α
268Mt70 ms
10.10 α10.24
266Mt1.7 ms
10.46 α
11.74...
265Hs1.7 m s
10.52 α
0.8 ms
10.37α10.3010.34
10.57
266Hs1.9 ms
10.17 α
267Hs59 ms
9.75 α9.839.88
269Hs20.9 s
9.18 α
264Hs0.26 ms
10.4350 α50 sf
Mt
Hs261Bh
11.8 ms
10.03 α10.1010.40
262Bh102 m s
10.24 α
8.0 ms
9.74α10.37
10.08
264Bh440 ms
9.48 α9.62
266Bh1 s ?
9.30 α
267Bh17 s
8.85 α
260Sg3.6 ms
9.72αsf
9.819.76
259Sg0.48 s
9.03 α9.369.62
262Sg6.1 ms
sf
258Sg2.9 ms
sf
261Sg0.23 s
9.47 α9.529.56
263Sg0.9 s
9.25 α
0.3 s
9.06α
265Sg7.4 s
9.69 α8.768.848.94
266Sg21 s
8.52α
? sf
255Db1.6 s
? αsf
256Db3.6 ms
8.89αe
9.079.01
9.12
258Db4.4 s
9.0167 α
33 e
9.179.08
257Db1.5 s
9.16
0.76 s
9.078.97
α?sf
α?sf
259Db0.5 s
9.47 α
260Db1.5 s
9.059.089.13
>90 α<10 sf ?
261Db1.8 s
8.93>50 α<50 sf
262Db34 s
8.4567 α33 sf
8.66
263Db27 s
8.36 57 sf
254Rf23 ms
sf
253Rf48 ms
sf
256Rf62 ms
8.790.6 α98 sf
258Rf13 ms
sf
260Rf20 ms
sf
262Rf2.1 s
sf
257Rf4.0 s
9.16
3.9 s
8.788.74α
α
?sfe
255Rf1.64 s
8.7748 α52 sf
8.72
261Rf78 s
8.28
67 α 33 e
<1 sf ?
259Rf3.1 s
8.77 sf
8.87
261Lr39 m
sf
262Lr3.6 h
e
260Lr3 m
8.03 25 e
259Lr0.36 s
8.45 23 sf
258Lr3.9 s
8.56 α8.598.628.65
257Lr0.65 s
8.80 α8.86
256Lr25.9 s
8.39 α8.438.52
252Lr0.36 s
α9.02
253Lr0.57 s
8.72
1.49 s
8.79αsf
αsf
260No160 ms
sf
262No5 ms
sf
259No58 m
7.52αe
7.587.55
258No1.2 ms
sf
256No2.91 s
8.40 0.53 sf
8.45
257No26 s
8.22 α8.278.32
255No3.1 m
7.9361 α
39 e sf
8.088.12
187...?;e
253No1.7 m
8.01
250No0.25 ms
sf
Sg
Db
Rf
Lr
260Md31.8 d
sf
259Md95 m
sf
258Md51 d57 m
6.72
e
85α
?15e
6.76
488...369
257Md5.52 h
7.01...85 e
?
7.07
371325...
256Md1.30 h
7.15... 91 e 7.22
255Md27 m
7.33... 92 e ?453;405
251Md4.0 m
7.55... 99 e
250Md52 s
7.75 93 e 7.82
252Md2.3 m
<50 αe
252Md2.3 m
<50 αe
249Md24 s
8.03αe
248Md7 s
8.32 20 αe8.36
247Md0.2 s1.12 s
α sfe
8.42
247Md0.2 s0.26 s
α sf8.42
Md0.9 ms0.35 s
α sf8.688.64
254Md28 m10 m
αe
αe
243Fm0.18 s
α
244Fm3 ms
sf
245Fm4.2 s
α
No
246Fm1.1 s
8.25α
6 sf
247Fm35 s
8.86
9.2 s
7.877.93α
αe
248Fm36 s
7.83 sf
7.87
249Fm2.6 m
85 e 7.53
250Fm30 m1.8 s
7.43I?α
sf
251Fm5.30 h
92 e 6.78
252Fm25.4 h
7.00sf7.04
?;e
253Fm3.0 d
6.67 88 e ?272...
6.94
255Fm20.1 h
6.96 sf
7.02
?;e81;58...
254Fm3.24 h
7.15 sf
7.19
?;e99;44...
257Fm100 d
6.52 0.21sf?242;180...
258Fm0.38 ms
sf
259Fm1.5 s
sf
256Fm2.63 s70 ns
488
I?8α
92sf?231
369... sf
6.92369
Fm
Md
Bh
254Lr13 s
8.46
22 e8.4142;209;305 ?
252No2.3 s
911
53 ms
8.37I?
75α25sf886
251No55 s2 sµ
8.58
I?
α
sf714783
8.82
?143...204
253Md6 m
<50 αe
353 ?
254No55 s
53
0.26 s
8.74I?
α
sfe842
943
246Md1.0 s4.4 s
8.56αsf e8.18
α8.74
255Lr25.9 s
8.46 α
2.6 s
8.37α8.31
Published data since 2010
Opened projects
Topic for this talk 253Fm – single particle isomer 253No – K isomer
253Fm – single particle isomer
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 6
S. Antalic et al. EPJ A47, 62 (2011)
CE-γ coincidences
γ – before CEs
γ – delayed after CEs
253Fm Produced via 45% beta decay of 253No
and beta decay of 253Md
First beta decay data in region Z>100
Electron - coincidences Electron - coincidences
Applied reaction 48Ca+207Pb → 253No + 2n
(1.8 x 106 nuclei)
Applied reaction 48Ca+207Pb → 253No + 2n
(1.8 x 106 nuclei)
a vs. b decay production of 253Fm
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 7
S. Antalic et al. EPJ A47, 62 (2011)
Opened problem:
How to connect upper part populated by beta decay of 253Md, with the lower
part populated by 257No alpha decay [M. Asai et al., PRL 95, 102502 (2005)]?
Opened problem:
How to connect upper part populated by beta decay of 253Md, with the lower
part populated by 257No alpha decay [M. Asai et al., PRL 95, 102502 (2005)]?
How is isomer connected to g.s.? How is isomer connected to g.s.?
M. Asai et al. PRL 95, 102502 (2005)
253Fm produced via a decay of 257No at JAERI
253Fm and N=153 isotones
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 8
S. Antalic et al. EPJ A47, 62 (2011)
Opened problem:
How to connect upper part populated by beta decay of 253Md, with the lower
part populated by 257No alpha decay [M. Asai et al., PRL 95, 102502 (2005)]?
Opened problem:
How to connect upper part populated by beta decay of 253Md, with the lower
part populated by 257No alpha decay [M. Asai et al., PRL 95, 102502 (2005)]?
How is isomer connected to g.s.? How is isomer connected to g.s.?
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 9
K isomers
Multi-quasiparticle states are located typically above 1 MeV. Very complex decay schemes
Rich source of data on the structure (chance to populate many low lying levels)
K-isomers might have additional hindrance against radioactive decay and might play a important role for enhanced stability of superheavy nuclei. In some cases lifetime of the isomer exceeds the g.s. lifetime. (see e.g. 270Ds or 250No.) [experiment: S. Hofmann et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 10, 5 (2001) and D. Peterson et al., (2006). Phys. Rev. C74 014316]
1 2 3
J
K
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 /18
254No – complex decay scheme
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250
0
20
40
60
80
250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500
0
5
10
15
20
25
500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700 725 750
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
No254m2_clo_einzel_r229_r2479.5.2007
E / keV
Ere
ign
isse
Ere
ign
isse
179.5
Ere
ign
isse
168.5
156.9
111.4
147.5
143.6
133.3
347.1
325.5
311.9
301.8
605.7
F.P. Hessberger et al., EPJ A43, 55 (2010)
JYFL: R.D. Herzberg et al. Nature 442, 896 (2006)
Argonne: S.K. Tandel et al_PRL97, 082502 (2006)
48Ca+208Pb→254No+2n
~ 270 000 nuclei
~ 6300 in K=16 isomer
48Ca+208Pb→254No+2n
~ 270 000 nuclei
~ 6300 in K=16 isomer
Known isomer since 1973 A. Ghiorso et al. PRC 7, 2032 (1973)
Known isomer since 1973 A. Ghiorso et al. PRC 7, 2032 (1973)
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 11
253No –K isomer
F.P. Hessberger , Phys. At. Nucl. 70, 1445 (2007)
Decay spectroscopy
S. Antalic et al. EPJ A47, 62 (2011)
Crucial requirement: We need low
background to see low-energy
electron- coincidences!
Crucial requirement: We need low
background to see low-energy
electron- coincidences!
E / keV
Ee
lectr
on / k
eV
Back to the 48Ca+207Pb → 253No + 2n Back to the 48Ca+207Pb → 253No + 2n
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 12
253No Produced in rection 48Ca+207Pb → 253No + 2n (1.8 x 106 nuclei)
Delayed e-- coincidences showed the presence of second isomer with many lines
F.P. Hessberger , Phys. At. Nucl. 70, 1445 (2007)
9/2-[734]: R.D. Herzberg et al., EPJ A42, 333 (2009)
Decay spectroscopy In-beam spectroscopy
7/2+[624]: P. Reiter. et al, PRL 95, 032501 (2005) 032501
S. Antalic et al. EPJ A47, 62 (2011)
Isomer helped to detect rotational band
and provide independent information about its assignment.
Isomer helped to detect rotational band
and provide independent information about its assignment.
Possible decay scheme
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 13
A. Lopez-Martens et al. NPA852 15 (2011)
Opened problem:
Despite of high statistics (1.8 x 106
nuclei) very weak - coincidences.
Opened problem:
Despite of high statistics (1.8 x 106
nuclei) very weak - coincidences.
Suggested decay scheme from
VASSILISSA@JINR Dubna
Suggested decay scheme from
VASSILISSA@JINR Dubna
Single-particle isomer Single-particle isomer
Multi-quasi
particle isomer
Multi-quasi
particle isomer
To confirm the decay scheme, more detailed
spectroscopy data are necessary.
To confirm the decay scheme, more detailed
spectroscopy data are necessary.
Geant simulations for present setup
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 14
Germanium clover: 60 x 60 x 140 mm Encapsulated in 1 mm Al 802
keV
188 keV
714 keV
209 keV
73 % 27 %
802 keV
89 keV
10% 9%
802 keV
209 keV
26%
140
60
60
142
122
Ge
Al
How important is the detector granularity? How important is the detector granularity?
20 crystals
714 802 keV keV
714 802 keV keV
209 keV 188 keV
209 keV 188 keV
30 counts 3 counts
28 counts
140 counts 140 counts
205 counts
coinc. to 802 keV
coinc. to 714 keV
coinc. to 802 keV
coinc. to 714 keV
single spectrum single spectrum
GEANT simulation (40 000 events)
Increase from one to 5 clovers brought significant
increase for Ga-Ga coincidences (factor of 5 - 6)
Increase from one to 5 clovers brought significant
increase for Ga-Ga coincidences (factor of 5 - 6)
single spectrum
4 crystals
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 15
Conclusion • Interesting new data are on the way (see examples 253No
and 253Fm)
• Present limit for spectroscopy is Sg (Z = 106), however
already for Rf (Z = 104) its challenging.
• Requirements for these measurements:
– High intense beam (1 pmA and more)
– low background (low energy electrons and gammas delayed after
ER implantation)
– high-sensitivity detectors (granularity is critical)
• Still lot of work is waiting for us and we need to do many
small steps to understand superheavy elements!
22. 6. 2013 Padova, 9th - 13th of June 2013 16
Thank you